Skip to main content

Full text of "Rhode Island Historical Society collections"

See other formats


iSBBBsM 


mm 


n 


•       <\  <V      -o.»*        Gv 

\^   -7-  °^  \0   -7*1  *    # 


A 


D^     o  • " c  -     **b 


•     A 


"^A.   Q^ 


r.  .Gv  *o  '\  <r.  .G%  *o  .'\ 


A 


^ 


1        *  <j>     » 


<v  .Gv  T*     A  ^.     'o.»"      .(5T 


'bV1 


Q^  6  «   "    •   #  ^O 


0V         0 


XI  C  XI 


o  V 


\o^'      \ 


v>  >.        v*v    .!io>^. 


^ 


**< 


'•*  ***** 

cf>*«         '^ImM?*         A>«*  oW^ttvf'  ^^ 


0 

^  Mew? «       ^ 


,ox 


^, 


.  0^  0   °   "    ° 

^V*V     'if;    ^V    ViSIF    *v^ 


++C? 


Rhode    Island 

Historical  Society 
Collections 


Vol.  XXVI. 


JANUARY,  1933 


No.  1 


METAL   TOKENS   USED    AS   CURRENCY 

Metal  tokens  issued  in  Providence  in  1844  and  1863  which  were  used 
as  money  on  account  of  the  lack  of  metal  fractional  currency. 

From  the  Society's  Museum 


Issued  Quarts 


.  JUH  -7  B33  j 


CA'. 


68  Waterman  Street,  Providence,  Rhode  Island 


CONTENTS 


1 


PAGE 

Tradesmen's  Tokens    .....  Cover 

Colonial  Newport  as  a  Summer  Resort, 

by  Carl  Bridenbaugh     .....  1 

New  Publications  of  Rhode  Island  Interest     .  .        24 

Notes 24 

Peace  Dale  Seals, 

Communicated  by  Caroline  Hazard        .  .        25 

Westconnaug  Purchase, 

Communicated  by  T.  G.  Foster       ...        26 


RHODE 
HISTORICAL 


ISLAND 

SOCIETY 


COLLECTIONS 


Vol.  XXVI. 


JANUARY,  1933 


No. 


William  Davis  Miller,  President   Gilbert  A.  Harrington,  Treasurer 
Howard  W.  Preston,  Secretary  Howard  M.  Chapin,  Librarian 


The  Society  assumes  no  responsibility  for  the  statements  or  the  opinions 
of  contributors. 


Colonial   Newport  as  a   Summer   Resort 

"y  Carl  Bridenbaugh 

At  the  southern  tip  of  the  island  of  Rhode  Island  lies 
Newport,  of  which  it  has  been  said,  "The  climate  is  the  most 
salubrious  of  any  part  of  his  Majesty's  possessions  in 
America.  ...  It  is  made  the  resort  every  summer  of  numer- 
ous wealthy  inhabitants  of  the  Southern  Colonies,  and  the 
West  Indies,  seeking  health  and  pleasure.  For  the  same 
reasons,  and  to  enjoy  the  refined  and  polished  Society  of 
Newport,  many  families  of  fortune  from  the  West  Indies 
and  Europe  have  taken  up  their  permanent  residence  there ; 
and  among  them  many  men  of  science  and  education  have 
.  .  .  made  it  their  abode.  .  .  .  There  are  upwards  of  nine 
thousand  inhabitants,  celebrated  for  their  hospitality  to 
strangers,  and  extremely  genteel  and  courtly  in  their 
manners."1 


2  RHODE  ISLAM)  HISTORICAL  SOCIETY 

This  is  not  modern  real  estate  promotion  "literature," 
but  an  excerpt  from  a  letter  written  in  the  year  1765  by 
Robert  Melville,  governor  of  His  Majesty's  Colony  of 
Grenada.  The  fame  which  Newport  enjoys  today  as  a 
summer  resort  of  wealth  and  fashion  dates  from  colonial 
days,  and  long  before  the  American  Revolution  it  had 
achieved  its  established  position  as  "Our  Social  Capital." 
The- climate  of  the  Narragansett  country  was  likened  by 
Bishop  Berkeley  to  that  of  Italy,2  and  Richard  Greenough, 
a  native  son,  heartily  echoed  his  sentiment  when  he  dubbed 
it  the  "American  Venice.""  The  Reverend  Mr.  Cal  lender 
quoted  with  pride  in  his  Century  Sermon  of  1  7.^8  the  words 
of  praise  uttered  by  "old  Neale":  "this  is  deservedly 
esteemed  the  Paradise  of  New-England  for  the  fruitful  - 
ness  of  the  Soil  and  the  temperateness  of  the  Climate."4 
In  1  798,  writing  of  the  scene  of  his  boyhood,  Arthur  Brown 
recalled  that  "the  Climate  of  Rhode  Island,  often  called  the 
garden  and  the  Montpelier  of  America,  induced  such  num- 
bers of  wealthy  persons  from  the  southward  to  reside  there 
in  the  summer,  that  it  was  ludicrously  called  the  Carolina 
hospital."'" 

The  earliest  visitors  to  Newport  were  planters  from  the 
West  Indies  who  came  there  to  enjoy  its  beneficial  climate. 
Several  invalid  Antiguans  arrived  at  Newport  as  early  as 
1729,  to  rebuild  their  health  which  had  been  impaired  by 
the  excessive  heat  of  that  tropical  island.1'  Many  of  these 
people  became  enamored  of  the  beautiful  Narragansett 
country  and  determined  to  settle  there.  When  Bishop 
Berkeley  landed,  in  1  729,  he  was  greeted  by  the  Redwoods 
of  Antigua,  the  DeCourcys  of  Ireland,  the  Bretts  of  Ger- 
many, and  the  Scotts  of  Scotland.  Newport  was  already 
famous  as  a  watering  place.' 

Before  long  the  South  Carolinians,  many  of  whom 
originally  came  from  Barbadoes  and  other  islands  of  the 
Caribbees,  began  to  sense  the  desirability  of  a  vacation  spent 
away  from  the  fever-infested  swamps  of  the  Carolina  tide- 
water/    Among    the    first   of    the   summer    visitors    from 


COLONIAL  NEWPORT  AS  A  SUMMER  RESORT  6 

Charles  Town,  was  Col.  Thomas  Pollock,  who  came  to 
"enjoy  the  advantages  of  the  Climate,"  and  "passed  much 
of  his  time  in  Newport."  Pollock  practically  became  a 
resident  of  Newport,  and  contributed,  through  one  of  his 
children,  to  the  greatest  romance  in  the  history  of  the 
town.9 

The  early  Newport  records  have  suffered  from  the  rav- 
ages of  time  and  war,  and  our  information  is  slim  indeed. 
But  we  may  infer  from  what  little  we  possess  that  the 
stream  of  visitors  grew  steadily  following  1730.  In  par- 
ticular, the  number  of  South  Carolinians  increased,  and  in 
this  period  it  began  to  be  fashionable  as  well  as  beneficial 
for  southern  planters  to  summer  on  Rhode  Island.  About 
this  time  also  Philadelphia's  growing  merchant  aristocracy 
discovered  the  charm  of  Newport. 

No  record  of  the  concourse  of  visitors  was  kept  until  after 
the  founding  of  the  Newport  Mercury  in  1758.  The  enter- 
prising Samuel  Hall  and  his  successor,  Solomon  South- 
wick,  took  a  forward  step  for  American  journalism  when, 
in  1  767,  in  addition  to  the  usual  shipping  news,  they  began 
to  print  lists  of  summer  arrivals.  It  was  doubtless  a  source 
of  considerable  satisfaction  for  the  shopkeepers  of  Newport 
to  read  in  the  Mercury  of  June  1/8,  1767,  that  "Last 
Thursday,  the  Sloop  Charlestown,  Capt.  Joseph  Durfee, 
arrived  here  from  Charlestown,  South-Carolina,  in  9  days, 
with  whom  came  Passengers,  the  Reverend  Winwood 
Serjant,  intended  for  the  Episcopal  Church  in  Cambridge, 
near  Boston,  together  with  his  Lady,  and  a  number  of  other 
Gentlemen  and  Ladies.  The  whole  Number  of  Passengers 
amounted  to  Eighteen."  From  1 767  down  to  the  outbreak 
of  hostilities  in  1 775  these  notices  became  a  regular  feature 
of  the  Newport  Mercury.  It  was  Southwick's  custom  in 
this  period  to  print  the  names  of  prominent  visitors  in  cap- 
itals, whereas  the  familiar  coming  and  going  of  the  mercan- 
tile group  was  restricted  to  ordinary  font.  The  activities  of 
the  world  of  fashion,  thus  early  in  our  colonial  society, 
became  better  headline  material  than  the  simpler  doings  of 


4  K  II  ( i|)l'   ISLAM)  HISTORICAL  SOCIKTY 

mere  men  of  affairs.  Here,  in  embryo,  is  our  modern  so- 
ciety column,  a  feature  unique  in  the  colonial  press.10 

The  lists  of  arrivals  grew  steadily  in  size,  and  in  the  eight 
years  before  the  Revolution  we  know  that  over  four  hun- 
dred people  visited  Newport  in  the  summer  season.11  It  is 
possible  that  the  unchronicled  arrivals  totalled  many  more. 
By  far  the  largest  number  came  from  South  Carolina,  al- 
though Philadelphia  and  Jamaica  contributed  their  share. 
A  striking  feature  of  these  lists  is  the  fact  that  although 
Newport  had  a  regular  packet  service  to  New  York,  as  well 
as  to  the  West  Indies  and  the  South,  and  probably  trans- 
acted more  business  with  that  town  than  any  other,  not  one 
New  York  name  is  to  be  found.  Perhaps  the  Knicker- 
bockers had  already  found  their  way  to  Long  Island  and 
the  Catskills.12 

Good  boat  service  was  absolutely  necessary  to  Newport's 
development  as  a  resort.  In  1767  there  was  no  continuous 
road  from  the  South  to  New  England,  and  even  had  there 
been  one,  the  distance  and  rigors  of  the  trip  would  have 
discouraged  all  but  the  most  hardy.  The  journey  could 
more  conveniently  be  made  by  sea.  In  this  period  Newport 
was  enjoying  the  "golden  era"  of  her  commerce  with  the 
West  Indies.  Packet  ships  from  Narragansett  Bay  were  to 
be  found  in  all  of  the  southern  ports  and  in  the  havens  of 
the  Caribbean.1"  Captains  sought  passengers  as  well  as 
cargoes,  and  probably  many  a  planter  was  lured  north  by 
highly  colored  "sales  talks"  expatiating  on  the  beauties  of 
Rhode  Island.  The  conclusion  is  inescapable  that  Newport 
could  not  have  become  a  resort  had  it  not  been  first  a  flour- 
ishing seaport. 

Comfort  and  convenience,  however,  were  merely  rela- 
tive, whatever  the  means  of  travel  in  colonial  days  and  the 
journey  by  sea  to  Rhode  Island  was  hazardous,  to  say  the 
least.  The  Atlantic  coastline  was  almost  uncharted  and 
lighthouses  were  few.  We  marvel  today  that  families 
would  ever  have  made  the  attempt  when  we  read  in  the 
Mercury  of  June  18,  1  770,  of  a  vessel  wrecked  near  New 


COLONIAL  NEWPORT  AS  A  SUMMER  RESORT  5 

London:14  "This  Vessel  was  chartered  by  Col.  Smith,  of 
Charlestown,  S.  Carolina,  in  which  himself,  his  Lady,  4 
Children  and  4  Servants,  and  several  other  Personages, 
were  coming  to  this  Place  to  Spend  the  Summer.  But  hap- 
pily there  was  no  Person  lost  except  the  Mate,  who  was 
drowned. — Col.  Smith  and  his  Family  arrived  safe  here 
yesterday."  Perhaps  some,  of  whom  we  have  no  record, 
were  not  so  fortunate,  but  it  seems  safe  to  assume  that  those 
who  were  not  so  opulent  as  Col.  Smith  and  chose  the  regular 
packet  boats  were  probably  favored  with  better  passages 
under  the  care  of  expert  pilots.  At  any  rate,  the  packet 
service  became  the  favorite  means  of  transportation.  It  was, 
however,  a  long  and  tedious  voyage  to  Newport,  requiring 
from  Jamaica  twenty-five  to  thirty-three  days,1"  from 
Charles  Town,  seven  to  sixteen  (ten  being  the  aver- 
age),10 and  from  Philadelphia,  four  to  six  days.1'  When 
the  packet  sloop  or  brig  slid  past  Beaver  Tail  Light  and  tied 
up  at  Long  Wharf,  Newport,  we  may  be  assured  that  the 
weary  travelers  sighed  with  relief  and  hurried  ashore  to 
meet  their  waiting  friends.  Newport  must  have  had  its 
attractions  to  cause  people  to  risk  both  comfort  and  safety 
to  enjoy  them. 

Who  were  the  people  who  summered  in  Newport?  From 
what  class  of  society  in  their  native  towns  did  they  come? 
Fortunately,  the  Newport  Mercury  affords  the  answers. 
That  they  could  bear  the  costs  of  traveling  indicates  that 
most  of  them  were  wealthy,  and  an  investigation  of  their 
backgrounds  proves  that  many  of  the  people  who  came 
from  the  southern  colonies  and  the  West  Indies  were  of  the 
British  official  class.  "On  Monday  last  came  to  Town,  from 
Boston,  His  Excellency  Lord  Charles  Greville  Montague, 
governor  of  South  Carolina  and  his  Lady,  ...  to  pass  a  few 
weeks."18  We  have  already  noted  the  arrival  of  Robert 
Melville,  governor  of  Grenada.1''1  In  September,  1772, 
"...  Lieut.  Gov.  Young  of  Tobago  being  in  Town,"  in- 
vited the  Reverend  Ezra  Stiles  to  call  on  him.  "I  waited 
upon  him  and  his  Lady,"  wrote  the  Congregational  Min- 


6  RHODE  ISLAND  HISTORICAL  SOCIETY 

ister,  "and  spent  three  hours  with  him."""  In  the  same  year 
Lord  William  Campbell,  last  royal  governor  of  South 
Carolina,  spent  some  time  in  Newport  with  "his  Lady,"  the 
former  Sarah  Izard  of  Charles  Town."1  Newport  was  par- 
ticularly attractive  to  the  "Hon.  Augustus  Johnston,  Esq; 
Judge  of  the  Court  of  Vice-Admiralty  for  South-Caro- 
lina ;"  he  and  his  "Consort"  passed  the  summers  of  1769 
and  1  770  there.2"  Those  minor  officials  in  the  colonial  and 
naval  service  who  could  afford  the  luxury  were  also  to  be 
found  summering  at  Newport." 

The  merchant  princes  of  Charles  Town  and  the  wealthy 
planters  of  South  Carolina  constitute  the  largest  group  to 
visit  Newport.  Fear  of  the  yellow  and  "country"  fevers 
had  for  years  driven  the  Carolina  planters  into  Charles 
Town  during  the  summer  months,  and  after  1  765  the  fame 
of  Rhode  Island  lured  them  northward.  A  glance  at  the 
"society  page"  of  the  Mercury,  June  26,  1769,  informs  us 
that:  "Last  Friday  Capt.  Joseph  Durfee,  in  the  Sloop 
Charles-Town,  arriv'd  here  in  7  Days  from  Charles-Town, 
with  whom  came  Passengers  the  Hon.  Augustus  Johnston, 
Esq;  Judge  of  the  Court  of  Vice-Admiralty  for  South- 
Carolina,  &c.  Henry  Middleton,  Esq;  and  Family."  The 
brig  Betsy,  in  July,  landed  another  group:  "Mr.  John 
Izard,  Esq;  and  Family,  Alexander  Wright,  Esq;  and 
Family,  and  Archibald  McNeil,  Esq;  and  Family,"  from 
Charles  Town  after  a  passage  of  twelve  days."4  Two  years 
later  a  flutter  was  caused  in  the  social  set  by  the  arrival  of 
"Lieut.  Gov.  Bull,  Mr.  William  Bull,  Mr.  Outerbridge, 
Miss  Katy  Beale,  Dr.  John  Farquharson,  Mr.  Gabriel 
Manigault,  Miss  Hazell,  Mr.  Philip  Mines,  Mr.  John 
Morgery,  Mr.  Isaac  Milehill ,  and  others.""" 

By  1768  the  blueboods  of  Philadelphia  began  that  an- 
nual pilgrimage  to  the  Narragansett  Bay  country  which 
continues  to  this  day.  On  August  15,  the  Mercury  an- 
nounced the  arrival  of  "Mr.  John  Wharton,  and  Sister, 
Mr.  Samuel  Nichols,  Mr.  Williams,  and  Sister,  Mr.  Benj. 
Razvles,  of  Philadelphia."    In  the  seven  year  period  cov- 


COLONIAL  NEWPORT  AS  A  SUMMER  RESORT  / 

ered  by  this  paper,  we  note  among  other  members  of 
Philadelphia  society  the  names  of  Mr.  Clement  Biddle, 
Mr.  Josiah  Hewes,  Mr.  Gilbert  Rodman,  Mr.  Christopher 
Marshall,  the  Lillibridge  family,  Thomas  Mifflin  and  fam- 
ily, the  Philadelphia  Redwoods,  and  Mr.  Lewis  Bon- 
nettee.20  From  Jamaica,  Georgia,  and  North  Carolina  came 
summer  visitors  whose  names  are  less  familiar  today,  but 
who  certainly  were  socially  important  in  the  eighteenth 
century. 

The  season  was  long,  for  the  Southerners  especially, 
commencing  as  early  as  the  first  week  in  May,  and  lasting 
till  October,  occasionally  into  November.  This  we  also 
learn  from  the  Mercury,  which  began  to  take  notice  of 
departures  in  its  issue  of  November  6,  1769:  "This  Day 
sail'd  the  Sloop  Charles-Town,  Capt.  Joseph  Durfee,  for 
Charles-Town,  South-Carolina,  with  whom  went  Passen- 
gers, Mrs.  Wells  and  Daughter,  Augustus  Johnston,  Esq; 
Mr.  Sanderson,  Mr.  Edwards,  and  Mr.  Nathaniel  Russel." 
The  Philadelphians,  being  mostly  merchants,  had  of  neces- 
sity to  yield  to  the  calls  of  business,  and  generally  left  early 
in  September.  On  September  6,  1773,27  "sailed  for  Phil- 
adelphia, the  Sloop  Peace  and  Plenty,  Capt.  Joseph  An- 
thony, with  whom  went  Passengers,  Thomas  Mifflin,  Esq; 
and  Lady;  Mr.  Thomas  Hopkins,  and  Lady,  Mr.  Charles 
Startin,  and  Lady,  Mrs.  Sheilds,  Miss  Nabby  Collins,  Mr. 
John  Gardner,  Capt.  George  Crump,  Mr.  William  Mc- 
Donald, Mr.  John  Grant,  Mr.  Samuel  G.  Fowler,  Mr. 
John  P.  Hicks,  and  several  others." 

A  summer  spent  in  Newport  was  an  expensive  affair  that 
only  the  well-to-do  could  afford.  The  cost  of  transporta- 
tion, alone,  for  a  family  and  retinue  was  great;  "genteel" 
folk  would  feel  it  necessary  to  hire  the  whole  cabin  on  the 
packet  sloop.  When  they  arrived  at  Newport,  the  wealthier 
families  took  houses  for  the  period  of  their  stay.  In  the 
spring  and  early  summer  the  Mercury  was  filled  with  ad- 
vertisements like  the  following:28 


or. 


RHODE  ISLAND  1!  [STORICAL  SOCIETY 

To  Be  Let,  A  Genteel  House  and  Furniture, 
with  a  Garden,  &c,  pleasantly  located.  .  .  . 

By  Caleb  Godfrey. 

TO  LET  |  two  Houses]  very  convenient  and  pleas- 
antly situated,  with  two  good  Stables,  Gardens,  and 
Wells  of  Water,  &c  .  .  .  .  Enquire  of  the  Printer 
hereof. 

Gabriel  Manigault,  of  Charles  Town,  who  was  reputed  the 
richest  gentleman  in  the  Colonies,1""'  would  probably  have 
taken  such  a  residence  when  he  arrived  for  the  season. 

Some  of  the  regular  summer  visitors  owned  estates  near 
Newport,  and  may  be  regarded  as  the  forerunners  of  the 
Van  Rensselaers  and  Belmonts.  Mr.  William  Rodman,  of 
Philadelphia,  owned  "The  Noted  Farm  on  New-Shore- 
ham,"  which  was  advertised  for  sale  by  William  Ellery  in 
1 772.""  Occasionally  one  of  the  high  provincial  officials  was 
invited  to  stay  with  a  prominent  family  of  Newport.  In 
1728  Lord  Charles  Greville  Montague  "went  to  the 
Country-Seat  of  Mr.  William  Redwood,  .  .  .  where,  we 
hear,  His  Lordship  proposes  to  pass  a  few  weeks."31  Here, 
too,  he  probably  found  the  Philadelphia  Redwoods,  who 
frequently  spent  the  summer  with  their  Newport  cousins. 

The  less  opulent  had  to  be  satisfied  with  simpler  accom- 
modations in  the  town  itself,  such  as  "Three  Genteel 
Rooms,  pleasantly  situated  in  Marlborough-Street,  with 
the  Priviledge  of  a  Garret,  Yard,  and  Cellar,"  or  "a  Gen- 
teel Parlour,  furnished  with  Two  Bed-Rooms,  with  a 
Priviledge  in  the  Kitchen,  and  Accomodations  for  a  Ser- 
vant, in  the  good,  clear  Air,  and  retired."  There  were  no 
real  estate  agents  in  those  days,  and  one  procured  lodgings 
by  consulting  the  printer  of  the  Newport  Mercury?'  Single 
men,  of  whom  there  were  many,  generally  lodged  at  tav- 
erns like  Mary  Cowley's,  in  Church  Street,  which  adver- 
tised "several  decent  rooms  and  beds  unoccupied,"  for 
"gentlemen."'3 


COLONIAL  NEWPORT  AS  A  SUMMER  RESORT  y 

The  arrival  of  the  summer  visitors  was  welcomed  by  the 
shopkeepers  and  taverners  of  the  town  as  a  good  chance  to 
"turn  an  honest  penny."  John  and  William  Tweedy, 
druggists,  and  their  competitors,  Reak  and  Okey,  adver- 
tised their  cure-alls  and  nostrums  with  an  almost  modern 
assurance:  "The  Golden  Medical  Cephalic  Snuff,"  to  cure 
all  disorders  of  the  head;  "British  tooth-powder,"  at  2/6 
per  box;  and  "The  True  Italian  Ointment,"  at  3/6.  The 
ladies  greatly  feared  injury  to  their  complexions  from  ex- 
posure to  the  sun,  and  for  this  Reak  and  Okey  prescribed 
"Queen's  pearl  wash  ball,"  guaranteed  to  remove  "freckles 
and  sunburn.  It  renders  the  skin  delicately  white,  smooth, 
and  soft.  .  .  .  ""4  What  modern  cosmetic  could  promise 
more?  In  1773,  "Poree,  Surgeon-Dentist"  from  New 
York,  made  a  short  trip  to  Newport  in  July,  "at  the  inter- 
cession of  some  worthy  gentlemen,"  no  doubt  hoping  to 
find  a  market  for  his  "artificial  teeth"  among  the  summer 
people,'"  for  he  put  up  at  Mrs.  Cowley's  "genteel"  board- 
ing house.  John  Escoffier,  "just  arrived  from  Paris,"  in- 
forms the  public  that  he  has  opened  a  "Hair-Dressing 
Business"  and  "makes  Hair  Cushions  for  Ladies.""''  John 
Goddard,  cabinet-maker,  who  copies  Chippendale's  pat- 
terns from  a  manual  recently  imported,  hastens  to  prepare 
new  styles  of  furniture  for  his  West  Indian  customers.3' 
Paris  fashions  being  all  the  rage,  the  modish  female  will  of 
course  wish  to  visit  the  shop  of  "mary  martin,  Mil- 
lener  and  Mantua-Maker,  Lately  arrived  from  Paris. 
N.  B.  She  dresses  ladies  heads,  for  half  a  dollar,  at  the 
Shop;  and  if  waited  on,  at  a  dollar.  .  .  ."'iS  The  South- 
erners and  West  Indians  had  a  reputation  as  free  spenders, 
and  these  Yankee  tradesmen  intended  to  operate  on  this 
assumption."" 

An  analysis  of  the  lists  published  in  the  Mercury  reveals 
certain  social  characteristics  common  to  nearly  all  of  the 
summer  colony.  West  Indians  and  Southerners  were  pre- 
dominantly members  of  the  Anglican  communion.  Of  the 
Philadelphians  the  majority  also  worshipped  at  the  Estab- 


10  RHODE  ISLAND  HISTORICAL  SOCIETY 

lished  Church,  although  there  was  a  strong  minority  be- 
longing to  the  Society  of  Friends.  These  travelers,  there- 
fore, would  find  in  Newport,  where  Quakers  and  Episco- 
palians formed  the  most  influential  sects,  a  society  especially 
congenial  in  the  sphere  of  religion.4"  Socially  the  members 
of  the  summer  group  came  almost  wholly  from  the  rising 
merchant  aristocracy  of  the  colonial  towns.  Most  of  the 
Charlestonians  were  members  of  St.  Philip's  and  St.  Mi- 
chael's parishes — a  sufficient  key  to  distinction.  In  addition, 
many  belonged  to  the  Charles  Town  Library  and  the  very 
fashionable  St.  Cecilia  Society  whose  brilliant  reception  to 
Lord  Greville  Montague  in  1773  so  dazzled  the  sober 
Josiah  Quincy  of  Boston.41  The  South  Carolinians  who 
came  to  Newport  brought  with  them  an  established  social 
position,  and  lent  to  the  island  resort  a  decided  English 
tone  borrowed  from  their  native  town. 

Of  the  group  from  Philadelphia,  nearly  all  enjoyed 
membership  in  the  exclusive  "Dancing  Assembly,"  in  itself 
the  badge  of  gentility.4"  Seven  of  the  gentlemen  mentioned 
in  Newport's  "social  register"  were  vassals  of  the  Governor 
of  the  Colony  in  Schuylkill,  the  most  select  men's  club  of 
colonial  days,  and  one  of  them,  Thomas  Mifflin,  subscribed 
to  the  purses  of  the  Jockey  Club  and  rode  to  hounds  over 
the  course  of  the  Gloucester  Hunt.1"  We  have  no  means  of 
knowing  much  about  the  Jamaicans  and  Antiguans,  but  the 
fact  that  they  traveled  in  the  favored  company  of  royal 
governors  and  were  accustomed  to  pass  much  of  their  time 
in  London  lends  strength  to  their  claim  for  social  distinc- 
tion. Newport,  even  in  the  "gay  nineties,"  would  have 
found  it  hard  to  eclipse  the  galaxy  of  social  lights  it  pre- 
sented in  1772-1773.  With  its  intellectual  attainment, 
culture,  refinement,  and  wealth,  Newport  was  becoming  the 
Bath  of  America. 

We  have  already  noticed  that  the  first  attraction  of 
Newport  was  its  salubrious  climate,  which  was  a  great  in- 
ducement to  visitors  from  the  South.  This  never  lost  its 
appeal,   but    Newport,    like    Bath,    included    many    other 


COLONIAL  NEWPORT  AS  A  SUMMER  RESORT  11 

charms  in  its  repertoire.  Boston,  New  York,  and  Phil- 
adelphia were  sober  and  business-like  seaports,  places  in 
which  the  "puritan"  way  of  living  was  dominant.  Not  so 
with  Newport.  Because  of  its  heterogeneous  religious 
makeup,  this  town  was  from  its  beginning  free  from  clerical 
control.  "No  opinion  was  prohibited  consistent  with  moral- 
ity," wrote  Arthur  Brown,  because  ".  .  .  the  multiplicity  of 
secretaries  [sic]  produced  more  genuine  religion,  morality 
and  piety  .  .  .  than  in  any  country  I  have  ever  seen."44  The 
puritan  sabbath,  as  practiced  in  Boston,  calling  for  half  of 
Saturday  to  be  used  in  preparation  was  ridiculed  in  the 
Newport  press: 

.  .  .  'tis  plainly  seen,  how  changed  indeed, 

That  sacred  law,  which  God  himself  decreed! 

In  this  one  Act,  they  think  to  merit  Heav'n, 

By  taking  half  a  day  from  six,  and  adding  it  to  seven. 

The  people  of  Newport  evidently  agreed  with  Berkeley's 
dictum:  "Give  the  devil  his  due,  John  Calvin  was  a  great 
man,"  but  they  wanted  none  of  his  religious  discipline.45 
As  compared  with  Boston,  Newport  was  "wide  open"  on 
Saturday  nights.  To  the  gay,  pleasure-loving  planter  it 
was  indeed  an  attractive  spot,  while  the  Philadelphia  Angli- 
can felt  a  sense  of  relief  from  Quaker  sobriety  and  moral 
compulsion. 

Judged  by  eighteenth  century  standards  the  island  of 
Rhode  Island  offered  something  to  everyone — culture, 
solitude,  gaiety,  entertainment,  and  health. 

Though  the  sea  air  and  even  climate  of  Rhode  Island 
were  claimed  to  be  most  beneficial,  there  were  some  who 
failed  to  find  the  cure  for  which  they  sought.  The  Newport 
Mercury  records  thus  a  simple  tragedy  that  must  have  been 
frequently  re-enacted:4'''  "July  18,  .  .  .  died  Miss  Elizabeth 
Hollybrush,  of  Charlestown,  South-Carolina,  from  whence 
she  lately  arrived  here,  for  the  Recovery  of  her  Health, 
aged  21  Years.  .  ."  On  July  11,  1774  "James  Crooke, 
Esq;  and  family"  arrived  from  Jamaica,  "to  recover  his 


12  RHODE  ISLAM)  BISTORICAL  SOCIETY 

health,1'  but  on  August  10  the  Mercury  gives  notice  of  his 
death  and  burial  in  Trinity  Church  yard.4'  More  pleasant 
is  the  item  that  in  the  summer  of  1770,  "Hon.  James 
OttSy  on  a  Tour  for  his  Health,  spent  one  or  two  Days  in 
this  Town."48  Thus,  we  see  that  many  invalids  sought  re- 
covery along  the  shores  of  the  Narragansett,  but  the  im- 
pression gained  from  reading  the  newspaper  is  that  the 
majority  of  the  visitors  were  more  interested  in  prevention 
than  in  cure. 

These  "idle  rich"  formed  our  first  leisure  class,  and  to 
the  lower  classes  of  Newport  and  the  surrounding  country 
may  well  have  seemed  as  heretics  rebelling  against  the 
traditional  doctrine  of  "six  days  shalt  thou  labor  and  do  all 
thy  work."  Lilies  of  the  field  had  hardly  as  yet  an  accepted 
position  in  the  pioneer  society.  That  a  class  feeling  was 
developing  is  mentioned  in  a  condescending  manner  by 
Arthur  Brown:4"  ".  .  .  the  richer  merchants  .  .  .  together 
with  the  clergy,  lawyers,  physicians  and  officers  of  the 
English  navy  who  had  occasionally  settled  there,  were 
considered  as  gentry  $  even  being  a  member  of  the  Church 
of  England  gave  a  kind  of  distinctive  fashion.  A  superior 
order  thus  formed  by  better  and  more  information  existed 
even  to  a  degree  sufficient  to  excite  jealousy  in  the  agri- 
cultural system,  and  to  be  a  gentleman  was  sufficient  ...  to 
expose  the  bearer  of  that  name  to  mockery  and  rudeness, 
a  specie  of  inconvenience  which  a  liberal  mind  pardoned  as 
compensated  by  the  comfort  and  independence  which  pro- 
duced it."  An  undercurrent  of  resentment  thus  flowed  in 
the  relationship  between  summer  guest  and  native  laborer, 
notwithstanding  the  business  advantage  the  situation 
brought  to  the  latter. 

During  the  period  under  review  Newport  was  a  bustling 
seaport  of  seven  to  nine  thousand  inhabitants.""  For  a 
community  of  its  size  it  presented  unusual  cultural  oppor- 
tunities both  for  its  own  citizens  and  for  visitors.  Its  chief 
pride  was  the  great  collection  of  books  housed  in  the  beau- 
tiful Redwood  Library.    Although  this  was  a  subscription 


COLONIAL  NEWPORT  AS  A  SUMMER  RESORT  13 

library,  non-members  could  borrow  books  by  depositing  a 
sum  against  the  value  of  the  book  and  paying  a  small  fee 
for  its  hire.  Books  withdrawn  could  be  kept  for  a  month.51 
For  those  who  wished  to  improve  their  leisure  by  reading 
this  library  was  unsurpassed  in  the  Colonies.  The  Diary 
and  Itineraries  of  Ezra  Stiles,  librarian  of  the  Redwood, 
give  ample  evidence  of  the  wide  use  of  the  collection  by 
visitors  as  well  as  by  townsfolk/'2  Solomon  Southwick, 
printer  of  the  Mercury,  conducted  a  book  store  in  connec- 
tion with  his  business.  The  striking  feature  of  the  book 
advertisements  in  his  paper  is  the  amount  of  secular  litera- 
ture, especially  novels,  announced  for  sale,  as  compared 
with  what  was  demanded  by  the  more  austere  tastes  of  Bos- 
ton, New  York  and  Philadelphia."'"  Probably  one  of  his  best 
customers  was  the  Vice-Admiralty  Judge  of  Charles  Town, 
who  advertised  on  September  18,  1769:  "Those  Persons 
who  may  be  possessed  of  any  Books  belonging  to  Augustus 
Johnston,  are  earnestly  requested  to  return  them  as  soon  as 
may  be."  Use  of  the  Redwood  Library  was  evidently  sup- 
plemented by  private  circulation. 

Life  on  isolated  plantations  made  it  difficult  for  southern 
and  insular  planters  to  further  their  own  and  their  chil- 
dren's educations,  but  a  summer  in  Newport  offered  advan- 
tages in  this  line.  Many  gentlemen,  no  doubt,  profited  by 
the  opportunity  to  improve  their  fencing  under  Monsieur 
Bontamps,  Mr.  William  Pope,  or  Monsieur  Delile  of  the 
University  of  Bordeaux.54  Others  could  join  with  their 
ladies  in  the  study  of  French  under  one  of  the  many  teach- 
ers who  advertised.  Lewis  Delile,  recommended  by  Rev. 
Mr.  Stiles,  who  was  also  his  pupil,  announced  that  by  his 
method  "a  Scholar  can  learn  to  speak  very  good  French 
...  in  two  Months."50  Numerous  private  schools  for  boys 
and  girls  are  noticed  in  the  Mercury  and  possibly  owed 
their  existence  to  the  presence  of  the  summer  colony.50  For 
those  of  a  more  gregarious  turn  excellent  conversation  was 
to  be  had;  few  cultured  people  visited  Newport  without 
discussing  the  problems  of  the  universe  with  the  learned 


14  RHODE  ISLAND  HISTORICAL  SOCIETY 

Ezra  Stiles.  Trade  and  politics  were  the  principal  topics  of 
debate  at  the  Royal  Exchange  Coffee  House,  where  among 
convivial  surroundings  could  be  had  "the  best  of  London 
Porter,  Madeira,  Teneriffe,  White  Li[s|bon,  and  Claret 
Wines,  and  every  other  liquor  and  Convenience  suitable  to 
accomodate  Gentlemen  with."  All  strangers  and  travelers 
could  "depend  upon  the  best  Entertainment  and  Attend- 
ance."" Or,  if  you  had  a  friend  who  belonged  to  the 
"Fryday  Night  Club"  you  might  be  introduced  as  a  guest 
to  one  of  Col.  Godfrey  Malbone's  famous  dinners.58  The 
freemason  from  Charles  Town,  the  West  Indies  or  Phil- 
adelphia was  sure  to  be  welcome  at  the  meetings  of  the 
Newport  lodge."'1. 

As  if  to  usher  in  the  season  of  1772  came  the  announce- 
ment that  on  May  5,  "A  Grand  Concert  of  Vocal  and  In- 
strumental Mustek,  By  a  Number  of  the  First  Per- 
formers from  Boston,  &c,"''"  would  be  given  at  the  Court 
House,  commencing  at  7  P.  M.  sharp.  The  number  and 
frequency  of  the  advertisements  for  these  concerts  appear- 
ing in  the  Mercury  suggests  that  they  were  well  patronized. 
In  1767,  Henry  Hymes  announced  an  "Entertainment  of 
Mustek,  every  Monday,  Tuesday,  Wednesday,  and  Thurs- 
day, and  the  Performances  will  be  given  gratis.  .  .  .  Any 
Gentlemen  or  Ladies  wishing  private  Concerts  may  have  it 
upon  4  hours  notice,"  for  which  a  charge  will  be  made.61 
Music  had  been  popular  in  Newport  ever  since  1 733,  when 
Bishop  Berkeley  presented  an  organ  to  Trinity  Church."" 
The  vestry  was  always  careful  to  secure  a  competent  organ- 
ist, and  in  1773,  "William  Selby,  Organist  of  Trinity 
Church,  Newport,  Just  arrived  from  London,"  informed 
the  public  that  he  would  "instruct  young  Gentlemen  and 
Ladies  to  play  upon  the  violin,  flute,  harpsichord,  guitar 
and  other  instruments,  now  in  use.  .  .  ."'"'  That  the  visitors 
from  Charles  Town  appreciated  the  Newport  talent  is  seen 
from  an  advertisement  in  the  Newport  Mercury,  April, 
1771,  for  musicians  to  play  at  a  concert  with  the  St.  Cecilia 
Society.    A  first  and  second  fiddle,  two  hautboys,  and  a 


COLONIAL  NEWPORT  AS  A  SUMMER  RESORT  15 

bassoon  were  wanted,  and  it  was  hinted  that  there  was  a 
possibility  of  a  two  to  three  years'  engagement."4.  If  the 
numerous  announcements  of  Elias  Gilbert's  singing  class 
at  Bradford's  School  House  and  the  many  singing  books 
and  "English  Songs  in  score"  advertised  in  Southwick's 
paper  are  any  index,  voice  culture  was  very  popular.05 
Mayhap  they  still  sang  the  song  that  some  years  earlier  was 
on  everyone's  lips:  "The  Glorious  Success  of  His  Majesty's 
Arms  in  the  Reduction  of  Havannah."h(> 

Although  the  Hallam-Douglass  Company  of  actors  had 
played  for  two  seasons  in  Newport,  in  1761-1762,  no  reg- 
ular plays  were  performed  as  in  New  York,  Philadelphia 
and  Charles  Town.0'  But  the  visitors,  especially  from 
Charles  Town,  furnished  both  the  demand  and  the  neces- 
sary patronage,  and  from  time  to  time  occasional  perform- 
ances were  given.  In  1771  the  town  granted  a  license  to  a 
group  "to  act  plays,"  but  we  do  not  know  that  this  privilege 
was  ever  utilized.1'8  In  the  absence  of  real  productions  the 
people  accepted  the  best  substitute,  and  we  learn  from  the 
Mercury  that  in  1  769,°° 

On  Tuesday  Evening, 

The  Fifth  of  September  Instant, 

At  Mrs,  Cowley's  Assembly-Room 

In  Church-Lane, 

Will  be  read 

An  Opera, 

Call'd  Love  in  a  Village: 

By  a  Person  who  has  Read  and  Sung  in 
Most  of  the  Great  Towns  in  America. 

In  all  ways  a  developed  seaside  resort,  colonial  Newport, 
like  its  later  rivals  and  imitators,  furnished  its  crop  of  sum- 
mer romances,  and  then  as  now  a  wedding  thrilled  the 
visitors  and  townspeople.  In  1773  "William  Gibbins,  of 
Savannah,  Esq;"  married  Miss  Vally  Richardson  of  New- 


16  RHODE  ISLAND  HISTORICAL  SOCIETY 

port.  The  wedding  was  celebrated  in  November,  too  late 
for  most  of  the  summer  colony,  but  they  at  least  had  the 
pleasure  of  seeing  the  romance  develop.'"  But  the  next 
year  those  who  returned  to  Newport  were  rewarded  with 
the  privilege  of  witnessing  the  brilliant  marriage  of  a 
daughter  of  the  town  to  a  distinguished  visitor.  On  August 
22,  the  Mercury  reported  that  "Last  Thursday  was  mar- 
ried, at  Bedford,  in  Dartmouth,  Mr.  Clemment  B'uldle,  of 
Philadelphia,  merchant,  to  the  aimiable  Miss  Becca  Cor- 
nell, daughter  of  Gideon  Cornell,  Esq;  late  of  this  town, 
deceased.'"1 

The  lighter  forms  of  amusement  were  many  and  varied. 
Among  the  gentry  the  giving  of  large,  formal  dinners  was, 
perhaps,  the  most  widespread  of  all  social  activities.  The 
favorite  dishes  on  these  occasions  were  Dun-fish,'1"'  and 
West  India  turtles.  After  dinner  the  ladies  retired  and  the 
gentlemen  remained  at  the  table  for  pipes,  punch  and 
Madeira.  Before  the  men  rejoined  the  ladies  in  the  draw- 
ing-room for  cards  and  dancing,"5  the  latter  regaled  them- 
selves with  the  latest  gossip.  In  September  of  1774  society 
was  pleasantly  horrified  by  the  notorious  Wanton  scandal. 
Such  affairs  were  not  at  all  unusual  in  the  families  of  arti- 
sans and  mechanics — but  the  Wantons  of  Newport!  The 
distraught  husband,  soon  angered  by  prevailing  rumors, 
vented  his  spleen  in  the  press:'4  "Whereas  Content  Wan- 
ton, the  wife  of  John  Wanton  (son  of  James)  hath  absented 
herself  from  my  bed  and  board,  without  any  cause  or  of- 
fence given  by  me,  but,  as  I  suppose,  by  the  advice  of  some 
persons  who  are  enemies  to  my  peace  and  happiness,  and  as 
their  wicked  counsel  may  extend  farther,  in  persuading  her 
to  run  me  into  debt,  to  accomplish  their  wicked  intent  of 
completing  my  ruin;"  this  is  to  give  notice  that  he  will 
assume  no  responsibility  for  debts  incurred  by  his  appar- 
ently well-named  wife. 

Dancing  was  a  favorite  form  of  amusement  in  Newport 
for  many  years  prior  to  the  Revolution.  An  Assembly  had 
been  formed  in  1745  by  thirteen  bachelors,  the  majority 


COLONIAL  NEWPORT  AS  A  SUMMER  RESORT  17 

members  of  Trinity  Church,  who  issued  invitations  to 
thirty-two  qualified  young  ladies.'5  We  can  find  no  records 
of  the  Assembly  after  1751,  but  there  exists  abundant  evi- 
dence that  the  habit  of  dancing  grew  with  time.  Dancing 
schools  increased  in  number,  and  French  dancing  masters 
began  to  advertise  frequently  in  the  newspaper."'  When- 
ever dinners  were  given  they  were  usually  followed  by 
dancing,  as  well  as  by  cards,  backgammon  and  billiards — 
always  accompanied  by  Madeira  for  the  ladies  and  rum 
punch  for  the  men."  Mary  Cowley  frequently  advertised 
her  Assembly-Rooms  which  opened  in  September,  one  to 
be  used  for  dancing,  "the  other  ...  a  separate  genteel 
Apartment  with  Card-Tables,  and  a  good  Fire.  Hours 
6-10  o'clock.'"8  Dancing,  for  the  most  part,  was  a  winter 
diversion  in  colonial  days,  although  Arthur  Brown  remem- 
bered that  "ki  warm  weather  parties  in  the  woods  and  din- 
ners, .  .  .  with  dances  afterwards  in  the  open  air  were  favor- 
ite amusements."  We  infer  that  most  people  liked  better 
the  customary  summer  "evening  promenades  .  .  .  when 
from  about  an  hour  after  sunset, .  .  .  the  country  resounded 
with  songs  and  serenades."79  This  is  truly  a  delightful  pic- 
ture of  an  idyllic  existence. 

It  must  never  be  forgotten  that  in  colonial  days  the 
church  was  the  central  social  agency.  In  the  two  decades 
preceding  the  American  Revolution  the  increasing  secular- 
ization of  life  in  the  towns  was  causing  the  church  to  lose 
much  of  its  influence,  but,  nevertheless,  it  still  played  the 
leading  role  on  the  provincial  stage.  The  social  events  of 
Newport  revolved  about  Trinity  Church.  To  be  an  Angli- 
can was  to  be  assured  of  a  superior  place  in  the  ranks  of 
society.so  Stiles  complained  bitterly  of  the  domination  of 
the  Redwood  Library  by  the  Church  of  England ;  "this  set 
out  as  a  Quaker  affair, . . .  [but]  the  Episcopalians  slyly  got 
into  &  obtained  a  Majority  wch  they  are  careful  to  keep."81 
Of  course  the  Congregational  parson  was  prejudiced,  but 
there  is  no  question  of  the  social  value  of  membership  in  the 
Anglican  Church.   The  royal  governors  and  lesser  officials 


18  RHODE  ISLAM)  HISTORICAL  SOCIETY 

who  set  the  tempo  of  provincial  life  were  generally  of  that 
communion,  and,  furthermore,  the  Church  was  far  more 
tolerant  and  lenient  in  its  attitude  toward  the  "frivolous" 
side  of  life  than  the  non-conforming  sects.  It  is  thus  no 
source  of  wonder  that  the  parish  register  of  Trinity  Church, 
Newport,  reads  like  the  bead  roll  of  early  Rhode  Island, 
and  on  a  pleasant  sabbath  in  the  summer  the  passerby  would 
see  large  numbers  of  the  visiting  gentry  escorting  their 
"consorts"  there  to  divine  service. 

Turtle  parties  enjoyed  a  great  popularity  as  a  summer 
entertainment.  Jahleel  Brenton's  negro  slave,  Cuffee 
Cockroach,  was  always  in  great  demand  as  a  turtle  cook. 
These  affairs  were  generally  held  on  Goat  Island  near  Ft. 
George.  Dinner  was  served  at  two  in  the  afternoon,  and 
was  followed  by  tea  at  five,  after  which  there  would  be 
dancing  while  the  musicians  played  "Pea  Straw,"  "Faithful 
Shepherd,"  and  "Arcadian  Nuptials."  The  parties  broke 
up  about  eleven  o'clock  with  a  final  hot  toddy,  and  the  gay 
revelers  were  ferried  back  to  town.82 

There  were  sporting  possibilities  in  the  neighborhood. 
The  summer  visitor  was  frequently  amused  by  horse  races 
on  the  beach  between  the  famous  Narragansett  pacers,  or 
by  exhibitions  of  horsemanship  by  "Mr.  Bates,  the  famous 
horseman,"  and  Christopher  Gardner,  the  local  boy,  whom 
the  townspeople  and  press  hailed  as  "the  original  American 
rider."*''  It  was  fashionable  to  take  an  afternoon's  drive  in 
a  chaise  about  the  Island,  and  stop  for  a  bite  to  eat  at  Abigail 
Stoneman's  tea  house  in  Middletown,  where  "large  enter- 
tainments .  .  .  will  be  prepared  on  the  shortest  notice."*4 
On  sunny  days  parties  were  made  up  to  hire  Samuel  Hay- 
wood's "new  pleasure-boat,  Liberty,"  and  explore  the 
coves  and  inlets  of  Narragansett  Bay,  or  to  make  a  run  to 
Providence  or  Bedford  on  the  packet  boats. s"  On  returning 
great  strength  of  mind  was  required  to  pass  the  Oyster 
House  on  Long  Wharf  without  sampling  a  dozen  salts 
or  so. 


COLONIAL  NEWPORT  AS  A  SUMMER  RESORT  19 

This,  then,  was  the  attractive  prospect  which  the  summer 
visitor  faced.  There  was  nothing  like  it  in  America,  a  sea- 
side town,  busily  attending  its  own  profitable  pursuits,  yet 
extending  its  hospitality  to  a  society  who  came  there  because 
of  its  charm,  and  who  generously  added  their  own  graces 
and  accomplishments.  The  life  was  simpler  than  today,  the 
display  of  wealth  less  great  perhaps,  the  social  stratification 
less  intense.  Newport"  was  more  of  a  flourishing  seaport 
then  than  now,  and  its  life  revolved  less  exclusively  around 
the  arrival  and  departure  of  its  summer  guests.  Yet  poten- 
tially Newport  was  in  the  eighteenth  century  as  in  the 
nineteenth,  the  health-restoring,  pleasure-giving  resort  of 
those  whose  loftier  birth,  accumulated  wealth  and  social 
accomplishments  afforded  them  opportunity  to  enjoy  in 
leisure  a  few  months  each  year  of  the  best  the  New  World 
could  offer.  This  happy,  gentle  society,  almost  unique  in 
the  pioneer  sternness  of  life  on  a  new  continent,  was 
abruptly,  though  not  permanently,  brought  to  a  close  by 
the  Outbreak  of  hostilities  in  1  775.  It  is  with  a  pang  of  re- 
gret that  we  read  the  last  "society  notice"  in  the  Mercury  :86 
"June  12,  arrived  here  the  Sloop  Friendship,  Capt.  Munro, 
in  14  days  from  Charles-Town,  with  whom  came  Passen- 
gers, Mr.  Isaac  McPherson,  Mr.  Jonathan  Clarke y  Mrs. 
Clarke^  and  Mr.  Nathan  Child}  all  of  South-Carolina.  This 
vessel  was  taken  under  the  protection  of  the  men  of  war." 

Massachusetts  Institute  of  Technology 
October  14,  1932 

Notes 

1Rhode  Island  Historical  Magazine,  (July,  1885),  VI,  45-46. 

2George  Berkeley,  Works,  (A.  Campbell,  ed.,  4  vol.,  Oxford,  1871), 
IV,  160.    Letter  of  April  24,  1729. 

HVilliam  B.  Weeden,  Early  Rhode  Island,  (New  York,   1910),  266. 

4Weeden,  Rhode  Island,  265. 

r'R.  I.  Hist.  Mag.,  (January,  1886),  VI,  165//. 

eMrs.  John  King  Van  Rensselaer,  Newport:  Our  Social  Capital,  (Phila- 
delphia,  1905),   19-20. 


20  RHODE  ISLAND  HISTORICAL  SOCIETY 

"G.  C.  Mason,  Reminiscences  of  Newport,  (Newport,   1884),  9. 

sFor  some  account  of  the  fevers,  see  Edward  McCrady,  The  History  of 
South  Carolina  under  the  Royal  Government,  (New  York,  1901), 
passim . 

''Mason,  Reminiscences,  160-165.  Col.  Pollock  was  sued  by  John 
Scollav  in  the  Rhode  Island  courts  and  ordered  to  pay  a  judgment  ol 
over  £500.  Walter  Chaloner,  sheriff  of  Newport,  went  bond  for  Pollock. 
The  latter  disappeared  and  never  returned,  and  Chaloner  was  thrown  into 
prison  to  satisfy  the  bond.  Thomas  Pollock,  Jr.  was  thus  left  to  bear 
the  shame  of  his  father's  crime.  The  Ferguson  family  would  not  permit 
the  lad  to  court  their  daughter  Ethel,  and  in  despair  he  signed  for  a 
merchantman  in  1799.  Returning  in  1813  with  a  privateersman,  Pol- 
lock learned  to  his  sorrow  that  the  Fergusons  had  moved  to  New  York. 
He  sought  out  Ethel  on  Long  Island  and  married  her.  They  removed  to 
Carolina  where  a  remnant  of  the  paternal  estate  afforded  them  a  refuge. 

'"Any  social  item  of  local  importance  was  reported  in  the  provincial 
press,  but  notices  of  this  special  type  are  not  to  be  found  in  the  other 
colonial  newspapers. 

''See  chart  accompanying  this  paper. 

l2Newport  Mercury,  August  10,  1761.  Benjamin  Blagg  of  New  York 
and  William  Richards  of  Newport  advertised  two  sloops  to  make  regular 
trips  between  the  towns. 

1:1  Bruce  M.  Bigelow,  The  Commerce  between  Rhode  Island  and  the 
West  Indies  in  the  Eighteenth  Century,  (Ms.,  John  Hay  Library),  is  the 
authority  on  this  important  subject.    Quoted  by  permission. 

^Newport  Mercury,  June  18,  1770.  A  page  of  this  issue  is  missing, 
consequently  we  do  not  know  the  name  of  the  vessel  or  exactly  where  it 
was  wrecked. 

^Newport  Mercury,  August  19,  1771  ;  June  24,  1771. 

^Newport  Mercury,  June  26,  1769;  June  18/25,  1768;  May  28, 
1770.    All  trips  were  made  by  the  sloop  Charlestown,  Capt.  Durfee. 

^Newport  Mercury,  July  5,  1773;  August  31,  1772.  The  trip  from 
Georgia  averaged  about  thirteen  days.  See  Newport  Mercury,  Julv  12, 
1773. 

18 Newport  Mercury,  August  1/8,  1768. 

'"A\  /.  Hist.  Mag.,  (July,   1885),  VI,  45-46. 

-"Literary  Diary  of  Ezra  Stiles,  (F.  B.  Dexter,  ed.,  2  vols.,  New 
York,  1901),  I,  281. 

21Newport  Mercury,  June  1  5,  1772. 

22Nezoport  Mercury,  June  26,  1769;  May  28,  1770. 

23Newport  Mercury,  August  7,   1769,  et  passim. 


COLONIAL  NEWPORT  AS  A  SUMMER  RESORT  21 

2i Newport  Mercury,  July  13,  1772. 

^Newport  Mercury,  June  6,  1774. 

26Newport  Mercury,  July  4/1  1,  1768;  September  2,  1771  ;  and  June 
28,  1773. 

2~Newport  Mercury,  September  6,  1773.  The  issue  of  October  9, 
1  769  notes  the  arrival  of  a  party  at  Charles  Town,  which  was  probably 
clipped  from  the  South-Carolina  Gazette.  This  may  indicate  that  social 
news  was  printed  in  that  paper. 

2&Newport  Mercury,  August  20,  1770;  March  5,  1770. 

2!)McCrady,  South  Carolina,  402. 

'M  Newport  Mercury,  May  1  1,  1772.  Col.  Pollock  had  a  place  in  New- 
port. 

31  Newport  Mercury,  August  1/8,  1768. 

32 Newport  Mercury,  August  5,  1765;  September  18,  1769. 

33Newport  Mercury,  July  2  5,  1774. 

34Mason,  Reminiscences,  9Sn;  Newport  Mercury,  June  6,  1774. 

35 Newport  -Mercury,  July  26,  1773. 

3C'Newport  Mercury,  October  2,  1775. 

37Mason,  Re??iiniscences,  49-50. 

^Newport  Mercury,  May  16,  1774. 

39See  Richard  Cumberland's  sentimental  comedy,  The  West  Indian, 
(London,  1771),  for  the  conception  of  the  free  and  easy  planter  that 
prevailed  at  the  time. 

40G.  C.  Mason,  Annals  of  Trinity  Church,  (Newport,  1890). 

41See  McCrady,  South  Carolina,  passim.,  and  index;  also  the  South 
Carolina  Historical  Society's  Collections,  (1857 — ). 

42Thomas  Willing  Balch,  The  Philadelphia  Assemblies,  (Philadelphia, 
1916),  has  lists  of  members,  many  of  whom  appear  in  the  Mercury's  lists. 

43Register  of  the  Jockey  Club,  (Ms.  in  Hist.  Soc.  of  Pa.);  also  the 
History  of  the  Schuylkill  Fishing  Company,  33;  and  History  of  the 
Gloucester  Hunting  Club,  67,  in  the  same  library. 

44^.  /.  Hist.  Mag.,  (January,  1886),  VI,  169. 

^Newport  Mercury,  May  19,  1761;  Berkeley,  Works,  IV,  160. 

^Newport  Mercury,  June  13/20,  1768. 

47 Newport  Mercury,  June  1  1,  July  18,  1774. 

48 Newport  Mercury,  August  13,  1770. 

4»R.  /.  Hist.  Mag.,  (January,  1886),  VI,  167-168. 

50In  1  774  the  population  was  9,209.  A  Century  of  Population  Growth, 
(Washington,  1909),  11. 


22  RHODE  ISLAND  HISTORICAL  SOCIETY 

r,,G.  C.  Mason,  Annals  of  the  Redwood  Library,  (Newport,   1881), 

40. 

"Ezra  Stiles,  Itineraries  and  other  Miscellanies,  .  .  .  with  a  Selection 
from  his  Correspondence,  (F.  B.  Dexter,  ed.,  New  Haven,  1916),  and 
Diary,  op.  cit. 

5ySee,  for  example,  the  list  in  the  Mercury,  June  6,  1774. 
^Newport  Mercury,  June  30,  1768;  June  12,  1769;  Stiles,  Diary,  I, 
184  (November  13,  1771). 

^Newport  Mercury,  November  2  5,  1771. 

^Newport  Mercury,  July  10,  1769;  July  4,  1768. 

"Newport  Mercury,  October  14,  1765. 

nsStiles,  Diary,  I,  31. 

^Newport  Mercury,  January  2,  1759. 

^Newport  Mercury,  May  4,  1772. 

tnNezi-port  Mercury,  August   17/24,  1767. 

i;-'Mason,  Trinity  Church,  5  8. 

^Newport  Mercury,  December  27,  1773. 

6 'Mason,  Reminiscences,  9-10. 

66 'New-port  Mercury,  June  4,  1770;  October  31,  1763. 

^Newport  Mercury,  September  14,  1762. 

"Newport  Mercury,  November  3,  1761. 

r"sMason,  Reininiscences,  123. 

^Newport  Mercury,  September  4,  1769;  September  1  1,  1769. 

""Nezcport  Mercury,  November  15,  1773. 

nNewport  Mercury,  August  22,  1774. 

7-Mason,  Reminiscences,  101-102.    Dun-fish  were  a  species  of  cod. 

~'R.  /.  Hist.  Mag.,  (January,  1886),  172. 

^Newport  Mercury,  September  19,  1774. 

Tr'Howard    M.   Chapin   in   Providence  Sunday   Journal,   October   22, 
1929. 

7aNewport  Mercury,  April  1  1,  1774. 

"R.  I.  Hist.  Mag.,  (January,  1886),  VI,  172-173. 

™NewpOfit  Mercury,  September  26,  1768;  November  2,  1772. 

79R.  /.  Hist.  Mag.,  (January,  1886),  VI,  172-173. 

B0Mason,  Trinity  Church,  passim. 

81Stiles,  Diary,  I,  166  (1771). 

s-Mason  describes  a  typical  party  in  Reminiscences,  10  1-102. 

s3Newport  Mercury,  May  6,  1  765 ;  October  25,1773;  May  23,  1  774. 


COLONIAL  NEWPORT  AS  A  SUMMER  RESORT  23 

**  New  fort  Mercury,  June  29,  1772. 

85Newfort  Mercury,  August  14,  1769;  February  22,  1773;  March  1, 
1773. 

iG Newport  Mercury,  June  12,  1775. 

SUMMER  VISITORS  AT  NEWPORT,  1 767-1 7751 


Town  or  Place 

1767 

17,68 

1769 

1770 

1771 

1772 

1773 

1774 

1775 

Total 

Charles  Town 

29 

12- 

292 

44 

33 

48 

14 

43- 

4 

266 

Philadelphia 

1 

15 

142 

202 

292 

13 

92 

Maryland 

1 

1 

North  Carolina 

2 

7 

9 

Georgia 

1 

20 

4 

25 

Boston 

1 

1 

West  Indies 

4 

4 

Jamaica 

1 

5 

20 

10 

18 

54 

Total 

30 

29 

29 

45 

553 

99 

73 

78 

4 

452 

1Compiled  from  files  of  the  Newport  Mercury,  1767-1775.    Where  a 
family  was  mentioned  its  size  was  assumed  to  be  six  in  number. 
-Others  came  but  names  not  known  by  printer. 
3Several  files  of  the  Mercury  are  missing  for  May  and  June,  1771. 


24  RHODE  ISLAND  HISTORICAL  SOCIETY 


New  Publications  of  Rhode  Island  Interest 

Original  Land  Grants  of  Portsmouth,  R.  I.,  compiled 
by  Edward  H.  West,  is  a  manuscript  atlas  of  ten  sheets 
showing  the  earliest  recorded  land  holdings  in  Portsmouth. 

1 1  ashingtonys  Headquarters ,  by   Mabel  Lorenz   Ives, 

contains  an  eleven-page  account  of  the  Stephen  Hopkins 
House  in  Providence. 

The  New  England  Historical  and  Genealogical  Register 
for  October,  1932,  contains  an  article  on  the  English  ances- 
try of  the  Fiske  family  by  G.  Andrews  Moriarty,  F.S.A. 

Frances,  the  Falconers  Daughter,  the  Mother  of  Gov- 
ernors, 1607-1 677 ,  by  Elizabeth  Nicholson  White,  is  an 
illustrated  volume  of  176  pages  dealing  with  Frances 
(Latham)  Dungan. 

Gilbert  Stuart,  by  William  T.  Whitley,  is  a  volume  of 
240  pages. 

Berkeley's  A  m  eric  an  Sojourn,  by  Benjamin  Rand,  a  book 
of  79  pages,  was  published  by  the  Harvard  University 
Press. 

A  History  of  the  Young  Ladies'  School,  1860-1898, 
and  Miss  Abbott's  School  Alumnae  Association,  1912-1930, 
written  and  compiled  by  Mary  B.  Anthony  and  Grace  P. 
Chapin,  Providence,  1932,  is  an  illustrated  book  of  57 
pages. 

Notes 

Mr.  Frederick  W.  York  has  been  elected  to  membership 
in  the  Society. 


Peace  Dale  Seals 

Communicated  by  Miss  Caroline  Hazard 


25 


The  seal  bearing  the  picture  of  a  dove  with  wings  ex- 
panded and  with  an  olive  branch  in  its  mouth,  surrounded 
by  the  words  PEACE  DALE,  R.  I.,  belonged  to  Rowland 
G.  Hazard,7  (1801-1888)  and  possibly  to  his  father, 
Rowland  Hazard,0  who  bought  a  house  on  the  Sauga- 
tucket  in  July  1805,  and  lived  there  with  his  family  for 
some  years.  Mary  Peace,  daughter  of  Isaac  Peace  of  Bris- 
tol, Pa.,  was  his  wife.  Hence  the  name  Peace  Dale  and 
the  dove. 


26 


KHODF.  ISLAND  HISTORICAL  SOCIETY 


The  Minutes  of  the  Westconnaug  Purchase 

Transcribed  by  Theodore  G.  Foster 

(Continued  from  Vol.  XXV,  page   128.) 

A  List  of  the  Persons' Sl  who  have  whole  Rights  in  West- 
quanaug  as  was  computed,  ordered,  and  allowed  at  a  Meet- 
ing of  the  Proprietors  of  Westquanauge  convened  at  the 
House  of  Joseph  Smith  in  Kingston  the  20th  of  February 
1706/7  /viz/ 


Col.  Samuel  Cranston 
Major  John  Greene 

20 
18 

39 

47 

23 

7 

Zachariah  Rhodes 

22 

53 

8 

Jeremiah  Clarke  .  . 

24 

36 

Jeremiah 

Clark 

10 

Clement  Weaver,  Senior 

5 

41 

28 

Clement  Weaver  Jun1"- 

4 

31 

Mr- 

Field 

s  Half  Share  on 

the 

South  Side 

of  Fourth 

Lot 

27 

Latham  Clarke 

27 

30 

13 

Nicholas  Carr 

14 

56 

18 

Weston  Clarke 

2 

52 

15 

Robert  Gardner 

26 

42 

19 

John  Fones 

13 

20 

William  Vaughn 

7 

33 

24 

Robert  Westcot 

29 

55 

3 

William  Fobes       ] 

28 

44 

4 

William  Pebody    \ 

1 

57 

12 

John  Rogers 

17 

46 

26 

sWest-Quanaug  or  The  West-Quanaug  Purchase. 

A  number  of  individuals  of  Newport  were  afterwards  associated  with 
the  first  purchasers,  among  whom  were  Gov.  John  Cranston,  Caleb  Carr, 
Thomas  Clark,  William  Foster,  Clement  Weaver,  Aaron  Davis,  John 
Jones  and  Latham  Clark,  most  or  all  of  whom  have  now  descendants  in 
the  town.  In  1707,  this  purchase  was  divided  by  lot  among  29  proprie- 
tors, but  the  first  settlement  was  not  commenced  until  1717.  The  first 
settler  was  Fzckiel  Hopkins,  whose  descendants  are  now  very  numerous  in 
the  town;  there  are  also  here  a  number  of  the  descendants  of  the  two 
Governors,  John  Cranston  and  Samuel  Cranston.  (A  Gazetteer  of  the 
States  of  Connecticut  and  Rhode  Island  by  John  C.  Pease  and  John  M. 
Niles,  1819,  p.  342.) 

The  spelling  Westenadgue  appears  in  Prov.  Town  Papers  (0623), 
printed  in  Prov.  Rec.  XVII,  199. 


WESTCONNAUG  PURCHASE  27 


John  Rhodes  23 

Malichy  Rhodes  .        6 

Simon  Smith  8 

Andrew  Harris  1 9 

Stephen  Arnold  21 

Peleg  Rhodes  1  1 

Benjamin  Carpenter  9 

Nathaniel  Waterman  *     25 

Hugh  Mosher  16 

Joseph  Case  ]2 

Aaron  Davis  3 
Lawrence  Springer  Half  Share    1  0 

Major  William  Wanton  1  5 


3  5    Drawn  by  Ellery  &  Davis 

2 

51 

16 

54 

21 

40 

6 

48 

14 

34 

1 

45 

11 

50 

22 

37 

9 

32 

5 

43 

25 

1  0    Half  of  a  whole  Share  -  - 

17 

To  the  Gentlemen  the  Proprietors  of  Providence  con- 
vened at  the  House  of  Mn  William  Turpin""  in  Providence 
in  the  Colony  of  Rhode  Island  &  Providence  Plantation  the 
22d  of  February  1  706/7 

Gentlemen  WE  whose  Names  are  hereunto  subscribed 
being  a  Committee  of  the  Proprietors  of  Westquanaug 
being  informed  that  Some  of  you  have  begun  to  lay  out 
Land  in  the  Southern  Side  of  the  Northern  Branch  of  Paw- 
tuxet  River  that  cometh  out  of  Ponhanganset  Pond  and 
lying  on  the  Northern  Side  of  Warwick  Northern  Bounds 
which  Land  is  the  Propriety  of  us  the  Subscribers  and  the 
Rest  of  our  Partners. 

WE  do  therefore  in  our  own  Behalf  and  also  on  Behalf  of 
the  Rest  of  our  Partners  forewarn  and  forbid  you  or  any  of 
you  to  make  any  Improvement  of  said  Land  as  having  no 
Right  thereunto  .  .  As  Witness  our  Hands  this  21st  of 
February  1706/7 

Samuel  Cranston 
Weston  Clark 
Robert  Gardner 
John  Rhodes 
Simon  Smith 

'A  copy  of  this  letter  appears  among  the  Providence  Town   Papers 
(0644)  and  is  printed  in  Prov.  Rec.  XVII,  223. 


28  RHODE  ISLAM)  EISTORICAL  SOCIETY 

March  31st  1  707.  The  Trustees  met  and  adjourned  to  the 
2(1  of  April   1707 

April  2'1  1702.  The  Proprietors  met  at  the  House  of 
Mr  William  Bright  in  Newport  and  according  to  the  Fore- 
going Agreement  These  underwritten  paid  in  their  Money 
to  John  Rhodes  the  Treasurer  chosen  /viz/  Major  Samuel 
Cranston  20  Major  John  Green  20/  Jeremiah  Clark  20/ 
Aron  Davis  20/  Robert  Gardner  20/  Nicholas  Carr  20/ 
Clement  Weaver  Sen'  20  Latham  Clark  20/  Joseph  Wil- 
bur paid  for  one  Half  Share  for  Lawrence  Springer  10/ 
Clement  Weaver  Jun  20/  Weston  Clark  20/  Simon  Smith 
20/  William  Lobes  20/  William  Pebody  20/  John  Rogers 
20  John  Rhodes  20/  Malichy  Rhodes  20/  Joseph  Case 
20.  Major  William  Wanton  20/ 

Ordered  That  Mr  John  Rhodes  Treasurer  of  the  Pro- 
prietors shall  forthwith  agree  with  Mr  John  Mumford 
Surveyor  to  go  forthwith  and  make  a  Map  and  Piatt' ll"  of 
said  Land  of  Westquanaug — and  said  Rhodes  Treasurer 
shall  appoint  such  and  so  many  to  assest  said  Surveyor  and 
shall  pay  both  Surveyor  and  his  Assestants  out  of  the 
Money  he  hath  in  his  Hands  paid  by  the  Company 
And  if  said  Treasurer  cannot  get  Mr.  Mumford  the  week 
the  other  Trustees  on  this  Main  may  appoint  as  they  shall 
think  fit  for  the  forwarding  the  said  Concern  and  We  do 
appoint  that  the  Trustees  as  this  Main  shall  upon  emmer- 
gent  occasion  act  and  do  all  things  needful  relating  or  con- 
cerning the  Premises 

Ordered  That  Zachariah  Rhodes  shall  have  a  Share  and 
a  Half  carried  on  at  free  Cost   .   .   .  This  was  ordered 

by  the  Trustees  on  the  Main  of  the  14th  of  of  April  1  707. 


10That  difficulties  were  encountered  in  the  attempt  to  make  this  survey 
is  shown  by  Providence  Town  Paper  0647  (printed  in  Prov.  Rec.  XVII, 
227);  a  warrant  dated  May  1,  1707  and  issued  by  Governor  Cranston, 
wherein  it  is  related  that  officials  of  the  Town  of  Providence  arrested  and 
imprisoned  the  Westconnaug  surveyors.  P.  T.  P.  (0651),  printed  XVII, 
233,  is  a  summons  in  this  case  dated  June  10,  1707  and  referring  the 
case  to  the  September  1  707  court. 


WESTCONNAUG  PURCHASE  29 

Memorandum  That  I  Zachariah  Rhodes  for  Consid- 
eration of  a  Right  and  Half  of  the  Lands  of  Westquanaug 
to  be  carried  on  without  any  charge  to  me  DO  Declare  that 
I  shall  in  no  way  impede  or  hinder  the  Proprietors  of  West- 
quanaug but  will  forward  and  help  them  as  much  as  I  may 
by  any  Deeds  or  Writings  that  are  in  my  Custody  Neither 
shall  I  help  any  that  shall  oppose  them  either  directly  or 
indirectly  .  .  Witness  my  Hand  the  14th  of  April  1707. 
Signed  in  the  Presence  of  Simon  Smith  Clerk 

Zachy  Rhodes 
At  a  Meeting  of  the  Proprietors  of  Westquanauge  at  the 
House  of  Mn  William  Bright  the  1 0th  of  June  1  708 

It  is  orderd  that  the  former  Committee  chosen  by  the 
Proprietors  for  managing  said  Purchase  is  still  continued: 
three  of  the  major  Part  of  them  to  meet  and  treat  with  the 
committee  chosen  by  the  Town  of  Providence111'  for  the 
Settlement  between  those  of  Providence  and  the  Proprie- 
tors aforesaid  and  what  the  Major  Part  shall  act  or  do  or. 
the  Premises  shall  be  taken  and  deemd  authoritative  to  all 
interests  and  Purposes — The  Names  of  the  Committee  are 
Col  Samuel  Cranston  Mr  Richard  Greene  Mr  Robert 
Gardner  Mr  Simon  Smith  Mr  John  Rhodes  Weston  Clark 
and  Malichy  Rhodes  who  have  hereby  full  Power  to  move 
from  Time  to  Time  and  Place  to  Place  while  the  Mater  be 
compleatd  if  possible  to  satisfaction — and  We  do  appoint 
the  First  Meeting  on  the  1  8th  Day  of  July  next  at  Warwick 
at  the  Hous  of  Mr  James  Carder  and  that  the  charge  of  the 
Treaty  be  borne  and  paid  by  the  Treasurer  of  the  Proprie- 
tors— John  Fones  is  chosen  Clerk  for  this  Meeting 

A  True  Copy 

John  Fones     Clerk 
This  is  treaty  entered  per  Mr  Simon  Smith  Clerk  of  the 
Proprietors 

"The  record  of  the  appointment  of  the  committee  of  the  Proprietors 
of  Providence  on  May  18,  1708  is  Prov.  Town  Paper  0664,  printed  in 
Prov.  Rec.  XVII,  239-240. 


30  RHODE  ISLAND  HISTORICAL  SOCIETY 


At  a  Meeting  of  the  Committee  of  the  Proprietors  of 
Westquanauge  this  Fifth  Day  of  September  1711  at 
Newport 

Present 
The  Honourable  Gov  Samuel  Cranston 
Mr  Weston  Clarke 
Mr  Robert  Gardner 
Mr  John  Rhodes 
Mr  Malichy  Rhodes  & 
Simon  Smith 
Ordered  that  whereas  Mr  Richard  Greene  who  was  one 
of  the  Committee  is  Dead   Mr  Job  Green  is  chosen  in 
his  Room  or  Stead 
And  Whereas  Mr  Robert  Gardner  one  of  the  Committee 
hath  sold  his  Right  to  Major  James  Brown  It  is  voted  by 
the  Committee  that  the  said  Gardner  shall  be  indemnified 
in  the  said  Sale  to  the  said  Brown  notwithstanding  the  In- 
junction in  the  Third  Article  of  our  Agreement  February 
20th  1706 

This  Meeting  is  adjournd  to  Tuesday  come  Sen  night 
the  1 8th  Instant  at  Warwick  and  if  that  be  foul  weather 
then  to  meet  the  next  convenient  Day 

At  a  Meeting  of  the  Proprietors  of  Providence  and  the 
Committee  of  the  Proprietors  of  Westquanauge  at  War- 
wick this  1  8th  of  September  1811"" 

Agreed  That  a  Petition  or  Exhitation  be  drawn  to  set 
forth  the  Claim  of  Providence  as  to  the  Title  within  the 
Jurisdiction  of  Connecticut  Colony  and  also  the  Title  of 
the  Proprietors  of  Westquanaug  which  lyeth  in  said  Colony 
which  Petition  is  to  be  presented  to  the  Court  of  assestants 
held  at  New  London  the  13th  of  October  next — And  the 
Men  to  draw  said  Petition  &c  are  Cap1  Thomas  Fenner  and 
Simon  Smith  and  Cap'  Thomas  Fenner  and  M'  Malichy 

l2Error  for  1711. 


WESTCONNAUG  PURCHASE  31 

Rhodes  are  to  carry  said  Petition  &c  and  the  charge  to  be 

borne  equally  by  both  Parties And  the  Persons  who 

draw  up  said  Petition  shall  have  full  Power  to  Sign  the 
same  on  Behalf  of  the  Proprietors  of  Providence  and  the 
Proprietors  of  Westquanaug' 13> 

_  And  it  is  farther  agreed  that  if  their  shall  be  any  Occa- 
sion to  go  to  Law  for  the  Lands  of  Providence  or  the  Lands 
of  Westquanaug  which'  lay  within  the  Jurisdiction  of  Con- 
necticut Then  the  Proprietors  of  Providence  and  the  Pro- 
prietors of  Westquanaug  shall  be  at  equal  Charge  for  carry- 
ing on  the  same  and  what  Title  we  pitch  upon  to  sue  we 
to  agree  to  at  next  October  Court 


To  the  Honourable  the  Governor  Deputy  Gover1' 
Assistants  and  Worshipful!  Representatives  sitting 
in  Court  at  New  Haven  in  the  County  of  New 
Haven  within  and  for  her  majestys  Colony 
of  Conicticut  the  1  1 th  of  October'  1711 
The  Exhibition  and  humble  Petetion  of  the  Comittee  of  the  Proprietors 
of  Providence  and  the  Comittee  of   the  Proprietors  of  Westquedniuke 
Namely  Colw  Samuel  Cranston  Esq1'-  Majr:    Joseph    fenckes  Esq1^  Capt: 
Thomas  Fenner  Esqr=  Maj  r=  James  Brown  Esqr  Capt:  Samuel  Wilkinson 
Mr-  Weston  Clark  Esqr:  Ltw:  Thomas  Harris  Mr:    John  Roades  Mr: 
Resolved  Waterman  Mr:  Job  Green  Esqr  M'=  Joseph  Brown  Mr:  Malachi 
Roades  -1':  Joshua  Winsor  and  Capt:   Simon   Smith   Esqr:— All  of  her 
Majestys  Colony  of   Road-Island   and   Providence   Plantations  Humbly 
Sheweth  and  Exhibiteth  to  your  Honours 

That  the  Proprietors  of  the  Anciant  Town  of  Providence  having 
upward  of  sixty  yeares  since  Purchased  of  the  Indian  Natives  the  Lands 
where  they  now  Live  Namely  all  the  Lands  Betwixt  Patucket  and 
Pautuxit  Rivers  And  so  to  Extend  from  a  Hill  Called  Fox-Hill  Twenty 
Miles  Westward  &c:  The  which  sd  Purchase  was  made  and  Granted  by 
one  of  the  most  Greatest  sachems  of  the  Narraganset  Countrev  and 
Confirmed  by  all  the  Chief  Princes  of  the  Natives  and  hath  had  a  good 
Sanchon  from  England  So  that  it  Cannot  be  thought  that  So  firme  a 
Title  should  be  Eclipsed  or  Deminished  under  any  Presents  Whatso- 
ever &c: 

_  Item  the  Proprietors  of  Westquodniuk  bv  anciant  Deeds  and  Con- 
firmations Upward  of  fifty  Yeares  since  Purchased  of  the  Indian  sachems 
a  Certain  Tract  of  Land  or  Part  of  the  Countrev  known  and  Called  bv 
the  Name  of  Westquodniuk  Bounded  Partly  on  the  Eastern  and  North 


32  RHODE  ISLAM)  HISTORICAL  SOCIETY 

Eastern  Parts  by  the  aforcsd  Lands  of  Providence  South  and  South 
westerly  by  the  Lands  of  Agans  west  and  north  westerly  by  Quinippoge 
Lands  and  northerly  by  the  Neppeneck  Lands  which  Lands  was  Con- 
firmed bv  Mosup  alias  Quissuckquans  the  Grand  Chief  sachem  of  the 
Narraganset  Countrev  Purchased  by  the  Assent,  and  so  well  approved  of 
by  the  Colony  of  Road-Island  that  they  Enacted  that  it  should  be  a 
Township  they  thinking  then  that  it  was  all  within  their  Own  Jurisdiction 

NOW  the  matter  is  that  since,  Commissioners  having  bin  Chosen  by 
Each  Colony  to  state  the  Boundarys  betwixt  them  as  to  Jurisdiction  of 
Goverment  And  they  having  Done  the  same  It  now  appeares  that  there 
is  neare  two  miles  of  the  Western  part  of  Providence  Purchase  the  whole 
Bredth  thereof  Lying  within  the  Jurisdiction  of  your  Colony  of 
Connicticut 

AND  also  a  Great  Part  of  the  Purchase  of  Westquodniuk  Lyeth  within 
your  Jurisdiction  Contrary  to  what  we  Imagined  before  the  Lines  were 
Run  So  that  we  think  it  Our  Duty  now  to  Lay  this  Exhibition  before 
vour  Honours  to  show  what  Title  we  have  within  your  Jurisdiction 
And  the  Rather  because  we  are  therunto  Incitted  by  a  Clause  in  yor 
Printed  Statutes  Pag  the  64: 

NOW  our  Huble  Petetion  to  vor  Honours  is  that  you  would  Give  us 
your  Leave  that  we  may  have  free  Accession  to  make  Improvement  and 
settle  those  Lands  so  Anciantly  Purchased  by  us  Now  Lying  within  your 
Jurisdiction  And  we  as  to  that  Part  shall  be  Obediant  and  submissive 
subjects  under  vour  Good  Goverment 

AND  this  we  are  the  more  Encouraged  to  Request  Considering  it  was 
a  special  Article  in  the  agreement  that  Propriety  should  be  maintained 
and  that  all  Anciant  Grants  Allowed  by  Each  Colony  should  stand  good 
Notwithstanding  the  agreement  Concerning  Jurisdiction  betwixt  sd 
Colonys  Upon  which  the  Colony  of  Road  Island  have  bin  Very  Carfull 
to  maintain  Proprictv  and  namely  upon  several  in  the  Western  Parts  of 
Westerly  who  after  the  Jurisdiction  line  was  Run  betwixt  the  Colonys 
they  fell  within  the  Jurisdiction  of  the  Colony  of  Road  Island  although 
their  Title  was  the  same  wth:  Conicticut  yet  the  Colony  of  Road  Island 
Maintained  their  Title  the  Jurisdiction  notwithstanding 

Wherefore  we  Pray  that  your  Honr:  will  Do  the  Like  and  grant  our 
Petetion  and  Give  to  Our  Messengers,  viz,  Majr:  Joseph  Jenckes  and 
Mr:  Malacky  Roades  the  Bearers  hereof  a  fovourable  admission  into  vour 
Hond:  Assembly  who  will  be  furnished  with  such  Deeds  &  manuscripts 
as  will  Evince  and  make  Probation  of  this  which  is  Laide  before  you 
(if  your  Honr:  Require  the  same)  And  we  Pray  that  vour  Honours 
would  give  them  Some  Answer  that  they  may  Return  the  same  to  LTs 
And  in  the  meane  time  We  Remain  yor:  Humble  Servt:  to  Command 


WESTCONNAUG  PURCHASE  33 

At  a  Meeting  of  the  committee  of  the  Proprietors  of 
Westquanaug  at  Warwick  Novemr  the  1 7th  1711 

Orderd  that  the  Treasurer  Mr  John  Rhodes  pay  unto 
Mr  Malichy  Rhodes  for  his  Services  and  Journey  to  the 
Assembly  at  Connecticut  at  New  Haven  the  Sum  of  Five 
Pounds  Two  Shillinds 

Orderd  that  Capt  Simon  Smith  in  Behalf  of  the  Com- 
mittee write  another  Letter  to  the  Assembly  of  Connecti- 
cut for  the  obtaining  their  possitive  Answer  stating  our 
Claim  within  their  Jurisdiction  as  is  agreed  upon  by  this 
Committee 

Orderd  that  when  the  season  of  the  Year  will  permit 
that  Malichy  Rhodes  be  appointed  Surveyor  with  the 
Assestance  of  M1'  John  Rhodes  to  Survey  and  lay  out  the 
Lands  of  Westquanauge  within  the  Colony  Line  according 
to  agreement  with  the  Town  of  Providence  and  to  propor- 
tions the  same  as  near  as  may  be  to  the  Right  of  each  Pro- 
prietor and  that  said  Rhodes  take  such  Assestance  as  the 
Work  will  require  so  far  as  relates  to  their  Part  .   .   . 

Ordered  that  this  Committee  be  adjourned  to  New- 
port the  last  Wednesday  in  February  next  or  any  of  the 
Three  Days  following'141 

At  a  Meeting  of  the  Committee  of  the  Proprietors  of 
Westquanaug  at  Newport  June  1 1th  1712. 

Providence  October  the  6th    1711    By  Order  of  Both  Comittes  Signed 
by  Us 

Thomas   Fenner 
Simo:   Smith 
(Connecticut  Archives,  Colonial  Boundaries,  I,  200  a  &  b.)    Courtesy 
of  the  Connecticut  State  Library. 

This  petition  was  considered  at  the  meeting  of  the  General  Assembly 
of  Connecticut  held  in  October,  1711,  but  no  action  was  taken  at  that 
time.    (Conn.  Col.  Rec.  V,  p.  277.) 

"On  March  22,  1711-12,  Nathaniel  Waterman  of  Providence  be- 
queathed to  "my  loveing  Grandsons  the  two  Zuriell  Watermans  all  my 
lands  in  the  Place  called  Wesquenoid".  His  will,  was  presented  for  pro- 
bate on  April  22,  1712.    (Prov.  Rec.  VII,  99.) 


34  K1K  IDE  ISLAND  HISTORICAL  SOCIETY 

Whereas  there  was  a  Meeting  of  the  Proprietors  of 
said  Westquanaug  appointed  at  the  House  of  Robert  Nich- 
ols of  Newport  the  10th  Instant  in  order  to  supply  the 
Treasurer  with  a  further  Stock  of  Money  to  carry  on  the 
Affairs  of  said  Purchase  and  to  defray  the  Charge  of  the 
Surveyor  &c  in  the  laying  out  said  Purchase  into  Farms  or 
Lots  and  the  said  Meeting  failing  for  want  or  through  the 
Neglect  of  the  Proprietors  making  their  Appearances  at 
said  Meeting:  The  Committee  considering  the  Premises 
and  the  Trust  and  Difficulty  of  getting  the  Proprietors  to 
meet  together  and  rinding  that  they  have  full  Power  and 
Authority  given  them  for  the  full  and  entire  Menagement 
and  finishing  all  Matters  and  Things  relating  said  Pur- 
chase  We  have  viewed  the  Treasurers  Accounts  and 

find  that  the  Money  already  deposited  is  all   paid   out 
towards  the  incident  charges  that  have  already  accrued  .... 

We  do  therefore  order  that  for  the  Defraying  and 
carrying  on  the  further  charge  that  Each  Proprietor  having 
a  Whole  Share  in  said  Purchase  shall  pay  or  cause  to  be 
paid  unto  Mr  John  Rhodes  of  Pawtuxet  Treasurer  or  to  his 
order  the  Sum  of  one  Pound  and  so  each  Proprietor  having 
more  or  less  than  a  whole  share  to  pay  according  to  that 
Proportion:  and  that  the  said  Sum  or  Sums  shall  be  paid  to 
Said  Treasurer  on  or  before  the  First  Tuesday  of  Septem- 
ber next 

Malachy  Rhodes  Clerk 

At  a  Meeting  of  the  Major  Part  of  the  committee  of 
Westquanaug  at  Newport  September  the  1 3th  1714 

Whereas  Mr  Malachy  Rhodes  of  Pawtuxet  Deceased 
was  appointed  and  constituted  Clerk  and  Surveyor  to  the 
Proprietors  of  the  said  Purchase  and  having  the  Register 
Book  in  his  custody  We  have  now  chosen  Job  Green  of 
Warwick  clerk  and  Register  to  said  Proprietors  in  the 
Room  and  Stead  of  Malachy  Rhodes  Deceased  and  that  he 
shall  go  forthwith  and  demand  and  receive  the  Register 
Book  at  the  Executrix  of  said  Rhodes  and  any  Writings  of 


WESTCONNAUG  PURCHASE  35 

said  Proprietors  and  give  a  Receipt  for  the  same  and  to 
[  r  account]  and  do  all  things  needful  on  the  Premises 

And  farther  that  he  the  said  Job  Greene  do  with  the 
Advice  and  concurrence  of  the  committee  on  the  Main  Land 
constitute  and  appoint  an  abel  and  well  qualified  Person  as 
Surveyor  or  Surveyors  in  the  Stead  &  Place  of  said  Rhodes 
deceased  so  as  the  said  Purchase  may  be  fully  Surveyed  and 
Plotted  and  all  other  Things  done  and  accomplished  with 
the  Town  of  Providence  according  to  Agreement  with  them 
and  to  make  Return  of  his  or  their  Proceedings  to  the  Com- 
mittee at  Providence  the  28th  Day  of  October  next  at  which 
Time  We  do  appoint  a  Meeting  then  to  to  do  all  things 
needful  therein Job  Greene  Clerk 

At  a  Meeting  of  part  of  the  Committee  with  some  of  the 
Proprietors  at  Providence  the  28th  of  October  1714 

Whereas  Job  Greene  presented  a  Map  of  his  Proced- 
ings  together  with  Major  William  Hopkins  with  the 
assestance  of  Major  Thomas  Fenner  in  that  affair  in  the 
North  Side  at  the  Dividing  Line  according  to  the  agree- 
ment with  the  Proprietors  of  Providence  but  there  appear- 
ing but  a  small  part  of  the  Proprietors  the  Meeting  was 
adjournd  to  Warwick  on  the  Sixteenth  Day  of  November 
following  for  a  more  full  Number  of  the  Company  But 
wind  and  weather  hindering  there  were  but  a  small  Appear- 
ance  But  those  that  met  agreed  as  followeth     That 

Job  Greene  should  proced  to  finish  the  Laying  out  the  First 
Division  with  the  Advice  of  Major  Thomas  Fenner  and 
Mr  John  Rhodes  and  to  finish  the  Division  by  the  last  of 
May  next  ensuing  in  order  to  come  to  a  Lotment  of  the 

same And  further  the  finding  that  there  hath  been  a 

failure  on  most  part  of  the  Proprietors  in  paying  of  Twenty 
Shillings  apiece  to  John  Rhodes  Treasurer  according  to  the 
order  of  the  Committee  at  Newport  June  1  1 th  1712  for  a 
further  Supply  to  defray  the  incident  Charges  of  said  Pur- 
chase Therefore  it  is  agreed  on  that  each  Proprietor  that 
is  behind  in  paying  do  forthwith  pay  said  Sum  to  the  Treas- 


36  RHODK  ISLAM)  HISTORICAL  SOCIETY 

urer  in  order  to  defray  the  Charge  of  Surveying  and  it  is 
further  proposed  that  Major  Penner  be  added  to  the  Com- 
mittee in  the  Room  and  Stead  of  Malichy  deceased 
Signed  per  Order     Job  Greene  Clerk" 

At  a  Meeting  of  the  Committee  at  Newport  May  the  9th 
1715 

It  is  agreed  on  That  Major  Thomas  Fenner  is  accepted 
to  he  one  of  the  Committee  according  to  the  Proposals  at 
Warwick  and  that  Capt.  Benjamin  Ellery  is  hereby  chosen 
and  added  to  the  Committee  in  the  Room  and  Stead  of 
Mr  Weston  Clark  he  having  sold  his  part  of  the  Propriety 
of  Westquanaug  to  Mr  Joseph  Whipple  of  Providence  by 
consent  of  the  Committee  and  it  is  further  agreed  on  that 
Job  Greene  do  proced  to  lay  out  the  Remanding  Part  of 
said  First  Division  as  soon  as  may  be  and  to  take  what 
Assestance  he  thinks  proper  in  order  to  come  to  Alotment 
but  said  Greene's  own  Business  hindering  him  from  pro- 
ceeding forthwith  it  is  consented  to  by  the  Major  Part  of 
the  Committee  that  M1  John  Rhodes  shall  agree  with 
Josiah  Westcoat  Surveyor  to  lay  out  the  remainding  Part 
of  said  First  Division  with  the  Expedition  in  order  to  Alot- 
ment and  said  Rhodes  is  to  provide  Assestants  to  the  Sur- 
veyor and  the  whole  Charge  of  the  Surveying  to  be  paid 
out  of  the  Proprietors  Treasury 

Job  Greene  Clerk 


15Georgc  Lawton  of  Portsmouth  and  wife  Rebecca.  On  January  3, 
171S,  sold  to  Job  Lawton  of  Newport  one  half  share  of  land  at  Wesh- 
quanoak  which  was  formerly  bought  by  his  father  George  Lawton  from 
John  Crandall  on  December  12,   1<>X2(R.  1.  Land  Ev.    Ill,  224). 


(  To  be  continued ) 


\r     i, 


Roger  Williams  I'm  sn         HJ^* 


t 


E.  A.  Joi i\mi\  Co. 


PROA  11)1  \<  I 


Rhode    Island 

Historical  Society 
Collections 


Vol.  XXVI 


APRIL,   1933 


No.  2 


PACKET  SHIP  "RISING  STATES"  ADVERTISES  FOR  BUSINESS 


"JOR  CHARLESTON,  (S.  C.) 

*.*_  THE  Packet  Ship  RISING 
^  STATES,  Elisha  Swift, 
Master,  will  sail  on  toe  14th 
instant.  For  Freight  or  Pas 
*»ge.  aPpty  lo  ^e  ^asler  0f«  board,  at 
Graves's  Wharf,  or  to 

EVERETT  &  STILLWELL. 
March  10,  1812. 


VVhi 
H 

men 
whi( 
be  p 

.im) 

of  L 

alio 

putr 

Ft 


ADVERTISEMENT  IN  RHODE  ISLAND  AMERICAN  OF  MARCH    13,    1812 


See  fage  3  7 


Issued  Quarterly 


68  Waterman  Street,  Providence,  Rhode  Island 


CONTENTS 


PACK 


The  Rising  States,  a  Providence  Packet  Ship 
of  1812, 

by  George  L.  Miner 


Cover 
Center  Supplement 
37 


History  of  Jamestown, 
by  W.  L.  Watson 


40 


Genealogical  Notes, 

by  Edward  H.  West 


59 


New  Publications  of  Rhode  Island  Interest 


61 


Notes 


63 


Survey  of  Old  Rhode  Island  Houses 


63 


Spelling  of  Glocester,  R.  I., 
by  Howard  M.  Chapin 


64 


Treasurer's  Report, 

by  Gilbert  A.  Harrington 


65 


RHODE 
HISTORICAL 


ISLAND 


SOCIETY 


COLLECTIONS 


Vol.  XXVI 


APRIL,   1933 


No.  2 


William  Davis  Miller,  President   Gilbert  A.  Harrington,  Treasurer 
Howard  W.  Preston,  Secretary  Howard  M.  Chapin,  Librarian 


The  Society  assumes  no  responsibility  for  the  statements  or  the  opinions 
of  contributors. 


A  Providence  Packet  Ship  of  1812 

By  George  L.  Miner 

The  center  illustration  in  this  issue  of  the  Collections 
shows  a  most  interesting  portrait  of  the  1 69  ton  ship  Rising 
States  of  Providence  in  the  year  1812.  The  drawing,  dated 
November  9,  1812,  was  made  by  Charles  Simmons,  and  is 
done  on  a  sheet  of  linen  rag  paper  with  india  ink  of 
brownish-black  tint.  The  sails,  flags,  water  and  sky  are 
washed  in  with  water  colors.  The  sails  are  a  deep  tan  and 
the  water  and  sky  a  pale  blue.  Bright  colors — red,  yellow 
and  blue — pick  out  the  flags  and  the  eagle  on  the  stern. 
Altogether,  this  old  ship  portrait,  somewhat  crude  in  work- 
manship and  detail,  has  a  great  deal  of  delicacy  and  charm. 

This  picture  is  owned  by  Mr.  C.  Prescott  Knight  of 
Providence,  and  is  one  of  a  number  of  family  heirlooms 
that  recently  came  to  him  from  a  relative  who  handed  on 
the  tradition  that  the  ship  picture  was  from  a  collection 
of  articles  once  belonging  to  Moses  Brown,  Providence 
merchant. 


38  RHODE  ISLAM)  HISTORICAL  SOCIETY 

A  few  interesting  facts  have  come  to  light  about  the  ship 
Rising  States.  She  was  a  packet  ship  voyaging  in  1812 
between  Providence  and  Charleston,  South  Carolina;  First 
notice  of  her  sailing  appears  in  the  Providence  Gazette  of 
Saturday,  March  14,  1812:  "Port  of  Providence.  Entered: 
Ship  .  .  .  Rising  States,  Swift,  from  Charleston." 

In  the  same  week,  on  the  front  page  of  the  Rhode  Island 
American,  appears  an  advertisement  to  the  effect  that  the 
Packet  Ship  Rising  States,  Elisha  Swift,  Master,  will  sail 
March  14  for  Charleston,  S.  C.  This  advertisement  is 
reproduced  on  the  front  cover  of  Collections.  The 
Packet's  return  is  reported  in  the  Gazette  of  April  1  1,  and 
her  clearance  for  Charleston  again  is  reported  April  25, 
1812.  A  little  later  in  the  year  the  Gazette  reported  the 
arrival  of  Ship  Rising  States,  Swift,  from  Charleston,  May 
23.  And  in  its  issue  of  May  30,  the  Gazette  reports  Rising 
States,  Swift,  Master,  cleared  for  Charleston. 

PACKET  SHIPS  COMPETE 

The  Rising  States  had  a  competitor  whose  sailing  was 
advertised  in  the  Gazette  of  March  7,  1812: 

"For  Charleston  (S.  C.)  the  regular  Packet  Ship  Morn- 
ing Star,  Samuel  Grafton,  Master,  will  sail  on  the  8th  of 
March  next,  Wind  and  Weather  permitting.  For  Freight 
or  Passage,  apply  to  Grafton  and  Hawkins,  or  the  Master 
on  board,  at  Moses  Eddy  and  Brothers'  Wharf." 

The  owners  of  the  Rising  States  appear  in  a  manuscript 
list  about  1818  in  the  Society's  archives  as  Humphrey  & 
Everett.  The  March  1812  advertisement  of  the  sailing  was 
signed  by  Everett  &  Stillwell. 

Two  1812  Cargoes 

Among  the  old  shipping  documents  in  the  riles  of  the 
Society,  Mr.  Chapin  found  the  two  manifests  of  the  first 
two  voyages  of  the  Rising  States  noted  in  the  port  entries 
and  clearances. 


A  PROVIDENCE  PACKET  SHIP  OF  1812  39 

The  first  manifest  is  dated  at  Charleston,  February  26, 
1812.  It  lists  16  entries: 

Thirty-five  Barrells  Rice  consigned  to  Giles  Luther,  Bristol. 

Eighteen  do. 

Forty-five  Hogs  heads  Molasses 

Twelve  Tierces  Cotton  machinery 

Fifteen  Bbls  Rice 

One  barrell  bacon,  two  "bbls  Harness 

Fourteen  boxes  Cotton  Machinery 

Twenty-six  hhds  Molasses 

Eight  barrells  Rice,  to  George  Graves,  Providence. 

Seven  Barrells  Do.      to  Seth  Thayer 

Five  hhds  &  One  Tierce  Cotton  Seeds,  to  E.  Swift,  Providence 

One  bag  Coffee-One  bale  sheepskins,  to  E.  Swift,  Providence 

Sundry  pieces  Cotton  Machinery,  to  Giles  Luther,  Bristol 

Seven  Bales  Cotton,  to  Giles  Luther  Bristol 

Twenty  one  Barrells  Rice,  to  Everett  &  Stillwell,  Providence 

Ten  Bales'Cotton,  to  Everett  &  Stillwell,  Providence 

The  manifest  of  the  voyage  from  Providence  to  Charles- 
ton lists  nine  items: 

1.  Two  Hundred  Bbls  Menhaden  Fish,  shipped  from  Sam'l  P.  Allen 
to  consignee  E.  Swift. 

2.  One  hundred  Bbls  Bread,  from  Wm.  Potter  to  E.  Swift. 

3.  One  Hundred  Bbls  Apples,  from  George  Evans  to  E.  Swift. 

4.  Forty  Bbls  Potatoes,  from  George  Graves  to  E.  Swift. 

5.  Four  Boxes  Cards,  from  Alex  Jones  to  A.  D.  Meurry. 

6.  Seven  Bbls  Pork,  from  Everett  &  Stillwell,  Providence,  to  Stillwell 
&  Everett,  Charleston. 

7.  Six  Box's  Cotton  goods,  ditto. 

8.  Four  Box's  Bonnets,  ditto. 

9.  One  Hundred  Reams  Wrapping  paper,  ditto. 

(Cards  and  Bonnets  are  names  of  cotton  machinery.) 

What  happened  to  Packet  Ship  Rising  States  has  not 
been  discovered.  Indication  of  change  of  owners  or  master 
appear  on  the  back  of  the  portrait  of  the  ship.  There  in  the 
same  handwriting  that  is  seen  on  the  face  and  which  states 
that  it  was  Drawed  by  Charles  Simmons,  the  following 
inscription  is  written:  "A  Present  for  Thomas  Jackson, 
Providence." 


40  RHODE  ISLAND  HISTORICAL  SOCIETY 

The  foregoing  fragmentary  facts  regarding  a  Providence 
ship  of  1812  open  up  a  glimpse  of  an  interesting  period  in 
the  maritime  history  of  Narragansett  Bay.  What  effect  had 
the  War  of  1812  on  the  Rising  States;  what  became  of  her 
and  her  rival,  the  Morning  Star?  We  do  know  that  Provi- 
dence commerce  went  flat  at  the  time  of  the  war,  and  that  it 
revived  and  flourished  again  in  181  5,  and  reached  its  high 
mark  in  1819. 

A  note  on  the  tonnage  of  Rhode  Island  ports  in  1810  is 
given  in  Staples'  Annals:  Providence,  15,864  tons;  New- 
port, 12,517;  Bristol,  777. 


A  Short  History  of  Jamestown,  on  the  Island 
of  Conanicut,  Rhode  Island 

By  W.  L.  Watson 

In  writing  an  historical  sketch  of  Jamestown  or,  in  fact, 
any  of  the  older  New  England  towns,  it  has  always  seemed 
to  me  that  the  actual  history  really  began  in  the  14th  and 
1  5th  centuries,  in  those  widely  separated  movements  which, 
with  the  great  aid  of  the  invention  of  printing,  led  up  to 
the  Reformation  of  the  1 6th  century.  While  the  Reforma- 
tion was  essentially  a  religious  and  moral  movement,  of 
necessity  it  developed  in  the  individual  the  feeling  of 
responsibility  and  independence  of  thought.  The  courage 
and  determination  of  the  Pilgrims  to  leave  home  and 
friends  and  seek  a  new  life  in  an  unknown  country  was  not 
born  over  night.  It  was,  instead,  the  culmination  of  many 
years  of  struggle,  privation  and  persecution,  but  always 
with  an  ever  increasing  elevation  of  the  soul,  clarification 
of  the  mind  and  the  development  of  conscience. 

From  the  beginning  of  the  Reformation,  about  1515, 
down  to  1607,  when  that  little  band  at  Scroby,  exiled  by 
the  English  government,  crossed  to  Holland  and  settled 


HISTORY  OF  JAMESTOWN  41 

in  Leyden,  this  idea  of  freedom  in  religious  thought  had 
spread  in  all  the  governments  of  the  old  world.  But  the 
little  colony  in  Leyden  became  convinced  that  they  could 
never  attain  their  ideals  amid  the  surroundings  of  Europe, 
and  we  have  that  epoch-making  voyage  of  the  Mayflower 
in  1  620.  The  reasons  for  this  voyage,  and  the  strength  of 
character  it  took  to  make  it,  should  be  the  first  considera- 
tion in  any  history  of  early  New  England. 

The  first  voyage  having  been  successfully  made,  others 
soon  followed  and  by  1644,  thirty-four  thousand  people 
had  settled  in  New  England.   The  Bay  Colony,  developed 
more  along  commercial  lines,  soon  attained  the  greater 
prominence.   The  government  was  started  as  a  democracy, 
the  governor  and  his  assistants  being  chosen  by  the  free- 
men. But  in  1631,  it  was  decreed  that  none  but  members  of 
the  church  could  be  freemen.  The  government  thus  became 
a  pure  theocracy,  controlled,  unfortunately,  by  a  few  nar- 
row   minded,    superstitious    religious    bigots.'  Into    these 
surroundings  came  Roger  Williams  in  1631.   He  was  soon 
(1635)  banished  from  the  colony  because  of  his  religious 
views.    Mrs.  Ann  Hutchinson  also  preached  a  gospel  that 
offended  the  church  government.  She,  too,  was  banished 
"out  of  our  jurisdiction  as  a  woman  not  fit  for  our  society." 
Before  and  during  the  trial  many  of  her  followers  and 
others  in  sympathy  with  her,  had  been  warned  to  leave  the 
colony  or  they  would  be  summoned  before  the  court  "to 
answer  such  things  as  shall  be  objected."   Realizing  what 
the  outcome  would  be,  this  band,  under  the  leadership  of 
Dr.  John  Clarke  and  William  Coddington,  chartered  a 
sailing  vessel  with  the  intention  of  founding   their  own 
colony  somewhere  on  Long  Island  or  the  shores  of  Dela- 
ware Bay. 

While  the  vessel  was  rounding  Cape  Cod  a  few  of 
them  went  overland  to  Providence  to  confer  with  Roger 
Williams.  Being  in  full  sympathy  with  them  and  desiring 
such  people  as  neighbors,  he  suggested  that  they  purchase 
the  Island  of  Acquidneck  from  the  Indians.    ( It  will  be 


42  RHODE  ISLAND  HISTORICAL  SOCIETY 

recalled  that  one  of  the  many  points  of  disagreement 
between  Williams  and  the  Boston  authorities  was  his  con- 
tention that  the  king  had  no  right  to  the  land  in  America, 
as  it  belonged  to  the  Indians.)  His  suggestion  met  with 
the  approval  of  the  company  and  after  several  meetings 
with  the  Indian  Chiefs  Connonicus  and  Miantanomu,  who 
were  very  friendly  with  Roger  Williams,  a  compact  of 
government  was  drawn  up  on  the  7th  day  of  the  first  month 
( March )  and  on  the  24th  day  of  the  same  month  title  to 
"the  great  island  of  Acquidneck  lyinge  from  hence  East- 
ward in  this  Bay,  as  also  the  marsh  or  grasse  upon  Quinuni- 
cutt  and  the  rest  of  the  islands  in  the  Bay  (excepting 
Prudence )",  passed  from  the  Narragansett  Indians  to  "Mr. 
Coddington  and  his  friends  under  him."  Here,  I  believe, 
we  have  the  first  mention  of  Conanicut  in  any  official 
record. 

The  settlement  was  established  at  Pocasset  (now  Ports- 
mouth ),  and  in  the  first  year  it  has  been  estimated  that  over 
one  hundred  families  joined  the  new  colony.  Then  came 
the  division  of  the  colony  and  the  more  substantial  mem- 
bers, under  the  leadership  of  Dr.  John  Clarke  and  William 
Coddington,  moved  to  the  southern  part  of  the  island  and 
established  themselves  at  what  is  now  Newport. 

In  the  records  of  the  first  town  meeting  at  Newport  we 
find  the  following  entry: 

"It  is  agreed  and  ordered,  that  the  Plantation  now  begun  at  this 
Southwest  end  of  the  island,  shall  be  called  Newport:  and  that  all  the 
landes  lying  Northward  and  Eastward  from  the  said  Towne  towards 
Pocasset,  for  the  space  of  live  miles,  so  across  from  sea  to  sea  with  all  ye 
landes  Southward  and  Westward,  bounded  with  the  main  sea,  together 
with  the  small  Islands  and  the  grass  of  Cunnunnegott,  is  appointed  for 
the  accommodation  of  ye  said  Towne." 

Here  we  have  the  second  mention  of  Conanicut,  but  this 
time  with  a  special  reference  which  has  a  major  bearing  on 
the  history  of  the  island. 

In  picturing  conditions  with  which  the  settlers  of  prac- 
tically every  town  in  New  England  had  to  contend,  it  must 


HISTORY  OF  JAMESTOWN  43 

be  remembered  that  all  the  country  was  a  virgin  forest.  It 
was  even  so  at  Newport.  But  for  many  years  the  Narra- 
gansett  Indians  had  used  Conanicut  for  a  summer  camping 
ground  and  here,  after  first  having  cleared  the  ground,  they 
raised  their  crops  of  corn  and  beans.  Their  method  of 
clearing  was  to  set  fire  to  the  forest  when  conditions  were 
favorable  and  let  it  burn.  As  a  result  large  areas  were 
cleared  and  had  grown*  up  to  "grasse."  This  was  a  most 
valuable  crop  for  the  settlers  at  Newport  who,  as  yet  had 
very  limited  pasture  for  their  cattle.  Hence  the  "grasse 
of  Cunnunnegott"  was  especially  set  apart  "for  the  acom- 
modation  of  ye  said  Towne." 

But  trouble  arose  over  this  same  "grasse"  and  in  the 
Land  Evidence  Book  we  find  the  following  entry  dated 
March  10,  1656. 

"For  as  much  as  it  is  frequently  declared  that  of  late  there  have  been 
endeavors  used  by  some  who  are  neither  inhabitants  of  this  Island  or  mem- 
bers of  this  Colony,  to  get  into  their  possession  and  power  of  disposal  the 
above  Island  Quononaqutt.  And  considering  how  commodiously  ye  said 
Island  lieth  for  the  enlarging  the  acomodations  of  some  of  us,  in  regard  to 
ye  nearness  of  it  to  our  dwellings  as  also  considering  the  great  straight  that 
many  of  us  are  in,  for  want  of  commonage  for  cattle,  Therefore  and  for 
the  preventing  any  forreigners  getting  into  their  possession  whereby 
inconvenience  and  disturbance  might  possibly,  yea  and  probably  arise  to 
ye  government  of  this  Colony. 

"We  whose  names  are  hereto  subscribed  do  as  above  said  for  ourselves 
or  heirs  etc.  agree  as  followeth:  Viz. 

"First,  That  for  the  procuring  the  aforesaid  Island  Quononaqutt  for  ye 
occasions  aforesaid  we  do  hereby  authorize  and  appoint  seven  of  our  num- 
ber (namely)  William  Coddington  Esq.  Benedict  Arnold,  Sen.  William 
Brenton  or  in  his  absence  William  Baulston  in  his  stead,  also  Richard 
Smith  of  Narragansett,  also  Capt.  John  Cranston,  Caleb  Carr  and  John 
Sanford  to  use  the  best  of  their  endeavors  to  make  a  full  and  firm  purchase 
of  the  aforsaid  Island  Quononaqutt  for  and  to  themselves  &for  the  rest  of 
us  who  are  in  this  present  writing  hereafter  in  order  mentioned  and  also 
here  unto  to  subscribe,  and  to  the  end  premised  the  persons  aforenamed 

are  hereby  fully  and  absolutelv  impowered  and  authorized, to  meet 

....  and  agree  upon  any  direction  ....  about  getting  the  assurance  from 
any  Sachem  and  of  the  Indians  .  .  .  concerning  said  Island  Quononaqutt,  as 
also  for  the  Island  called  Dutch  Island  to  the  intent  Above  said." 

To  this  agreement  there  are  98  signatures. 


44  RHODE  ISLAM)  HISTORICAL  SOCIETY 

Richard  Smith  Junr.  negotiated  with  the  Indian  sachems 
and  a  price  of  £100,  to  be  paid  in  wampum  and  peage,  was 
agreed  upon.  The  sachems,  with  their  braves,  and  the  pur- 
chasers assembled  at  the  house  of  William  Coddington  in 
Newport  where  the  deed  was  signed  and  witnessed,  after 
which  it  was  ratified  by  the  passing  of  turf  and  twig  from 
other  sachems  to  Caleb  Carr  and  Francis  Brinley.  Joshua 
Fisher  made  a  survey  and  computed  the  area  of  the  island, 
which  was  found  to  contain  about  6,000  acres.  It  was  agreed 
to  allot  4,800  acres  for  division  among  the  proprietors,  260 
for  a  township,  20  acres  of  which  were  to  be  used  for  an 
Artillery  Garden,  a  "place  for  buriel  of  ye  dead,"  a  prison 
house,  and  for  a  road  four  rods  wide  to  run  across  the 
island,  and  240  acres  were  reserved  for  a  townplot  to  be 
divided  in  the  proportion  of  one  acre  of  townplot  to  20  acres 
of  farm  land.  The  remaining  land  was  reserved  for  high- 
ways and  for  reallotment  to  those  whose  lands  proved  to 
be  undesirable. 

It  will  thus  be  seen  that  the  originators  of  the  purchase 
had  quite  an  elaborate  scheme.  The  farm  lands  were  to  be 
at  the  north  and  south  ends  of  the  island,  and  the  four  rod 
road,  which  is  now  Narragansett  Avenue,  formerly  Ferry 
Road,  was  to  be  the  main  road  for  the  townplot. 

It  was  further  agreed  that  the  land  was  to  be  divided  in 
the  same  proportion  as  the  amount  subscribed,  thus  we 
read: 

"William  Coddington  of  Newport  Esq.,  &  Benedict  Arnold,  Senr. 
shall  each  of  them  pay  one  twentieth  part  of  the  whole  charge  and  shall 
each  of  them  receive  one  twentieth  part  of  the  premised  purchase,  and 
William  Brenton,  Merchant  shall  pay  one  fortieth  part  and  one,  one  hun- 
dred and  eleventh  part  of  the  whole  charge  and  shall  receive  one  fortieth 
part  and  one,  one  hundred  and  eleventh  part  of  the  premised  purchase. 
And  Richard  Smith  Senr.,  Capt.  John  Cranston,  Richard  Smith  Junr. 
Robert  Carr,  Caleb  Carr,  Francis  Brinley,  fames  Barker,  [ames  Rogers, 
John  Sailes,  John  Green,  Valentine  Whitman,  and  John  Sanford  shall 
each  of  them  pay  one  fortieth  part  of  the  whole  charge  and  shall  receive 
one  fortieth  part  of  the  premised  purchase." 


HISTORY  OF  JAMESTOWN  45 

And  so  it  goes  through  the  whole  list  of  98  names  until 
the  last  which  reads: 

"Thomas  Case,  Anthony  Ravenscraft,  Thomas  Oliver,  and  John  Fones 
shall  each  of  them  pav  one  nine  hundreth  part  of  the  whole  charge  and 
shall  each  of  them  receive  one  nine  hundredth  part  of  the  premised 
purchase." 

A  letter  written  by  Francis  Brinley,  one  of  the  purchas- 
ers, states  that  "John  Green  .  .  .  was  the  first  person  that 
improved  his  land,  and  immediately  sowed  hay  seed  on  his 
land  where  about  he  intended  to  build  a  house."  A  descrip- 
tion of  this  house  will  be  taken  up  later. 

The  original  plan  of  the  purchasers  provided  for  town 
plots  as  well  as  farming  sections.  The  four  rod  road,  now 
Narragansett  Avenue,  connecting  the  ferries,  was  the  old 
Indian  trail  and  along  this  were  located  the  town  plots.  The 
farms  were 'at  the  north  and  south  ends  of  the  island  and 
every  20  acres  of  farm  land  carried  one  acre  of  town  plot. 
But  those  actively  interested  were  farmers  and  they  gen- 
erally sold  or  traded  the  town  plot  to  which  they  were 
entitled.  Then  again  the  purchase  of  the  island,  with  many, 
was  simply  a  speculation  in  land  and  they  sold  their  interest 
even  before  the  property  was  divided.  All  these  things 
resulted  in  great  confusion  and  in  1680  the  island  was 
resurveyed  by  Robert  Hazard  and  all  the  records  obtain- 
able were  ordered  presented  to  the  town  clerk  for  recording. 

All  this  would  seem  to  indicate  that  the  island  was  not 
gaining  many  permanent  residents,  and  for  lack  of  land 
evidence  records  we  must  turn  to  another  source  for  further 
information. 

Conanicut  is  an  island,  and  Newport  was  the  only  market 
for  products  grown  there.  Most  of  the  residents  must  have 
had  their  own  boats,  but  in  a  letter  written  in  1675,  Captain 
Church  stated  that,  at  the  time  of  the  Great  Swamp  fight, 
when  he  was  summoned  from  his  home  in  Rehoboth  to 
Warwick,  he  crossed  the  bay  by  way  of  the  ferries,  and 
there  seems  to  be  no  question  that  he  referred  to  ferries 
from  Newport  to  Conanicut  and  from  Conanicut  to  Narra- 


46  RHODE  ISLAM)  H  [STORICAL  SOCIETY 

gansett.  If  there  was  travel  enough  to  support  two  ferries, 
one  on  each  side  of  the  island,  it  is  quite  evident  that  many 
settlers  had  taken  up  a  permanent  residence  on  the  island. 

The  history'  of  these  ferries  is  most  unusual  and  intensely 
interesting.  The  establishing  of  some  regular  means  of  get- 
ting to  "market"  would  be  the  first  necessity  of  an  island 
population,  and  while  Captain  Church  mentions  such  fer- 
ries in  1675  it  is  evident  that  they  had  then  been  in  opera- 
tion several  years.  The  first  license  to  operate  a  ferry  was 
granted  in  1695  to  Caleb  Carr,  afterward  governor  of  the 
colony,  but  records  show  that  he  had  already  operated  the 
ferry  many  years.  The  landing  in  Newport  was  at  exactly 
the  same  spot  as  is  the  present  ferry  landing,  at  the  foot  of 
Mill  Street,  formerly  Carr's  Lane,  and  on  the  property  of 
Caleb  Carr.  The  landing  on  Conanicut  was  about  opposite 
the  south  end  of  Gould  Island,  at  the  east  end  of  North 
Ferry  Road,  now  Eldred  Avenue.  The  old  stone  wharf  is 
still  to  be  seen  and  is  sometimes  referred  to  as  Howland's 
Wharf.  North  Ferry  Road  extended  directly  west  to  the 
west  shore,  and  while  there  is  no  wharf  in  evidence  at  this 
point,  the  stones  along  the  shore  seem  to  be  the  remains  of 
what  once  was  a  stone  wharf.  The  landing  for  this  west 
ferry  on  the  mainland  was  at  Plum  Beach. 

It  is  hard  to  determine  just  how  long  the  ferries  were 
operated  at  these  points,  but  in  1  709  we  find  that  John 
Carr,  son  of  Caleb,  was  granted  a  petition  for  the  renewal 
of  his  license.  At  the  same  time  a  license  was  granted  to 
Robert  Barker  to  operate  a  ferry  from  Jamestown  to  New- 
port, thus  giving  two  ferries  between  Newport  and  James- 
town. On  the  west  side  a  license  was  granted  to  Capt.  Josiah 
Arnold  and  also  one  to  John  and  Jeremiah  Smith  to  oper- 
ate from  Boston  Neck.  This  seems  a  superabundance,  but  it 
must  be  remembered  that  these  "ferries"  were  simply  sail- 
boats, operating  at  the  mercy  of  wind  and  tide.  Dr.  McSpar- 


lRhode  Island  Ferries  by  Dr.  and  Mrs.  Charles  V.  Chapin,  also  R.  I. 
Hist.  Coll.  XIV,  III. 


HISTORY  OF  JAMESTOWN  47 

ron  tells  of  catching  a  ferry  just  before  a  storm  and  the 
ferry  did  not  sail  again  for  two  days,  and  on  the  east  side  a 
boat  once  left  Newport  in  the  afternoon,  got  caught  in  the 
ice  off  Rose  Island  and  was  carried  through  the  passage, 
beyond  Brenton's  Reef,  not  arriving  at  Jamestown  until 
late  the  next  morning. 

The  ferry  from  Newport  to  Jamestown  was  owned  by 
descendants  of  Caleb  Carr  until  1  873,  a  period  of  1 78  years. 
The  other  ferries  changed  hands  frequently.  At  one  time 
the  colony  undertook  to  operate  the  west  ferry,  but  soon 
gave  it  up  and  sold  all  the  equipment  and  rights  to  Abel 
Franklin  for  "the  sum  of  Three  Thousand  and  Five  Hun- 
dred Pounds  in  good  and  passable  bills  of  public  credit  of 
said  Colony  old  Tenor."  ( This  was  the  time  during  which 
the  Colony  was  experimenting  with  flat  money ;  the  amount 
paid  was  worth  less  than  £500  silver  money.) 

In  1873  the  Jamestown  and  Newport  Ferry  Company 
was  organized  and  the  Steamer  Jamestown  began  her  regu- 
lar trips.  But  at  the  northern  end  of  the  island  was  a  ferry, 
so  called,  which  operated  only  Saturdays,  the  day  the  farm- 
ers "went  to  town"  to  trade  their  produce.  The  boat  left 
from  the  foot  of  Carr's  Lane.  The  gathering  farmers  would 
sit  on  the  water  fence  awaiting  the  arrival  of  Sam  Wright, 
whose  "Goot  morning,  chentlemens,  if  such  ye  be"  was  the 
real  signal  for  departure.  But  the  newly  organized  ferry 
company  objected  to  even  this  competition.  The  boat  was 
purchased  and  the  last  sail  boat  ferry  to  Newport  disap- 
peared from  the  island. 

The  record  of  the  Carr  family  in  connection  with  the 
ferry  is  quite  remarkable.  Caleb  Carr  founded  the  first  ferry 
sometime  before  1695,  his  son  John  received  the  first 
license  to  operate  the  ferry  in  1  709.  Ownership  of  the  ferry 
was  handed  down  from  father  to  son  through  five  genera- 
tions of  Samuel  Carrs  to  1873.  George  C.  Carr  was  organ- 
izer and  first  president  (  1  8 73- 1902)  of  the  Jamestown  and 
Newport  Ferry  Company;  Thomas  G.  Carr  was  president, 
1902-1908,  and  his  son,  George  C.  Carr,  has  been  treasurer, 


48  RHODK  ISLAND  HISTORICAL  SOCIETY 

except  for  one  year,  since  1913.  So,  except  for  eleven  years, 
a  descendant  of  Caleb  Carr  has  owned  the  Newport  ferry 
or  been  an  officer  in  the  ferry  company  from  1675  to  the 
present  time — a  period  of  259  years. 

In  following  the  history  of  the  ferries  we  see  the  devel- 
opment of  the  island.  But  there  is  other  evidence.  Back  in 
1678,  when  there  were  but  two  sailboat  ferries  operating, 
we  find  a  petition  by  Caleb  Carr  and  Francis  Brinley  to 
the  General  Assembly  to  incorporate  the  town.  This  was 
granted  on  November  4th  the  same  year,  "the  inhabitants 
to  have  the  same  priviledges  and  libertyes  as  were  granted 
to  New  Shoreham."  The  new  town  was  named  James 
Towne,  in  honor  of  James  I  of  England. 

At  the  first  town  meeting  the  records  show  the  following 
officers  elected: 


TOWN   MEETING  FOR  THE  ELECTION  OF  OFFICERS 

April  1679 

John  Fones  chosen  Moderator  Engaged 

John  Fones  chosen  clerk  of  said  town  Engaged 

Mr.  Caleb  Carr,  Sen'r.,  Mr.  Francis  Brinley, 

Caleb  Carr,  Jun'r.,  and  Nicholas  Carr  chosen 
to  be  Town  Counsel  1  Engaged 

Ebenezer  Slocum  and  Michaell  Kally  chosen  to  be  the 
two  constables  of  the  said  town,  but  Michaell 
Kally  obstinately  Refusing  to  take  his  engage- 
ment to  said  office,  Caleb  Carr,  Jun'r.  chosen 
in  his  stead 
Ebene7.er  Slocum  and  Caleb  Carr,  Jun'r.  Engaged 
to  their  said  offices. 

Peter  Wells  chosen  town  sargeant  Engaged 

Nicholas  Carr  and  Caleb  Carr,  Jun'r.  chosen  to  be 
viewers  of  cattle,  sheeps  Swine  and  Horses 
wich  may  be  carried  or  transported  from  this 
Township. 


HISTORY  OF  JAMESTOWN  49 

John  Fones 

Ebenezer  Slocum     ye  two  deputies  for  ye  court. 

The  first  town  hall  was  on  the  North  Road  just  south  of 
North  Ferry  Road.  The  inhabitants  were  predominantly 
farmers  and  the  vision  of  a  settlement  on  the  town  plots, 
four  miles  south  of  North  Ferry  Road,  was  not  realized 
until  many  years  later.  The  only  part  of  the  town  plot  which 
was  used  was  the  Artillery  Garden.  It  was  evidently 
intended  to  have  this  for  a  village  green  but  it  was  early 
used  for  a  burial  ground  and  is  so  used  today.  There  are 
stones  standing  that  bear  dates  in  the  early  1700's. 

There  were  four  main  highways,  one  running  across  the 
island  on  the  old  Indian  trail  through  the  proposed  town 
plot.  One  ran  north  and  south  from  this  road  to  the  north 
end  of  the  island,  another  from  the  Indian  trail  south  to 
the  beach,  and  the  other,  North  Ferry  Road,  ran  east  and 
west  connecting  the  ferries.  But  many  of  the  farms  did  not 
touch  any  of  these  highways,  so  an  interminable  number  of 
roads  were  laid  out.  These  were  not  fenced  and  many  ran 
through  other  men's  property.  This  led  to  endless  trouble 
and  lasted  many  years.  There  is  a  story  told  about  the  pro- 
posal to  close  one  of  these  roads  because  it  was  not  used. 
This  was  opposed  by  Robert  Watson  and  to  prove  that  it 
was  used,  he  yoked  up  his  oxen  to  the  ox  cart  and  drove  up 
and  down  it  all  day  with  his  wife  contentedly  knitting, 
seated  in  a  chair  placed  in  the  cart.  That  night  the  opposi- 
tion felled  a  number  of  trees,  thus  closing  the  road,  but  old 
Robert  cleared  these  up  the  next  morning  and  resumed  his 
solemn  journey.  In  the  end,  however,  he  lost  out  and  the 
road  was  closed.  A  later  owner  of  the  property  deeded  that 
part  of  the  farm  back  to  the  town  to  be  used  for  a  road  if  it 
was  ever  thought  best  to  open  it  again.  This  happened  some 
seventy-five  years  ago  and  was  the  last  of  the  controversies 
regarding  roads. 

The  story  of  these  old  roads  naturally  leads  to  the  old 
houses.  It  will  be  recalled  that  Francis  Brinley  stated  that 
"John  Green  was  the  first  to  improve  his  land  etc."  As  near 


50  RHODE  ISLAND  HISTORICAL  SOCIETY 

as  can  be  determined  he  built  his  house  about  1672  on  what 
is  now  known  as  Shoreby  Hill.  The  house  still  stands  but 
has  been  so  rebuilt,  repaired  and  added  to  that  all  trace  of 
the  original  house  is  lost.  There  are  portions  of  the  eastern 
part  that  possibly  have  the  original  timbers.  Joseph  Greene, 
a  Quaker  and  a  descendant  of  John,  who  gave  this  farm  in 
trust  for  the  benefit  of  the  Friend's  Church,  described  it  as, 
"My  farm  on  the  Island  of  Conanicut  known  by  the  name 
of  the  Greene  Farm,  and  the  house  thereon  standing  in 
which  I  now  live  (  where  my  predecessors  of  the  same  name 
have  lived  for  generations  back,  if  not  from  the  first  settle- 
ment of  the  Island  by  English  Emigrants)."  Among  the 
stipulations  of  his  will,  he  ordered  that  his  clock  be  kept  in 
the  southeast  corner  of  the  east  front  room  and  that  the 
west  front  chamber  be  kept  in  constant  readiness  for  "Min- 
isters and  others  traveling  in  the  service  of  Truth."  The 
room  was  to  be  furnished  with  "two  good  bedsteads,  two 
beds,  two  bolsters,  two  pair  of  pillows,  and  other  necessary 
furniture."  This  will  was  contested,  and  was  in  court  many 
years  before  it  was  finally  broken. 

Another  of  the  old  houses  is  the  Samuel  Carr  House, 
located  on  the  North  Road  near  the  center  of  the  island 
about  four  miles  north  of  the  Green  farmhouse.  It  was  built 
about  1686  by  Governor  Caleb  Carr  for  his  son  Edward. 
Like  the  old  Bull  house  in  Newport,  it  was  built  partly  of 
wood  and  partly  of  stone.  The  stones  of  the  western  end  are 
different  from  any  found  on  Conanicut  and  are  laid  in  the 
same  kind  of  mortar  as  was  found  in  the  Bull  house  and  the 
Old  Stone  Mill.  The  walls  were  twenty  or  more  inches 
thick.  Like  the  Greene  farmhouse  it  has  been  rebuilt  and 
repaired.  The  immense  chimney,  which  was  in  the  outer 
wall  of  the  house,  fell  during  a  gale  and  the  eastern  half 
has  been  rebuilt.  It  was  occupied  up  to  two  years  ago  but  is 
now  deserted  and  uncared  for. 

About  three  miles  northeast  of  the  Edward  Carr  house 
is  the  house  built  by  Capt.  Thomas  Paine,  about  1680.  It  is 
now  the  summer  residence  of  Robert  Yose.  This  house,  also, 


HISTORY  OF  JAMESTOWN  51 

has  been  rebuilt  and  enlarged  but  still  retains  the  immense 
chimney  with  its  old-fashioned  fireplaces,  the  uncovered 
beams  in  the  ceiling,  and  a  quaint  china  closet  with  glass 
doors  built  in  the  corner  of  the  front  room.  Unlike  the 
other  old  houses  on  the  island,  this  one  has  its  front  door 
on  the  east  instead  of  the  south. 

Capt.  Paine  was  commander  of  one  of  the  first  privateer 
vessels  sailing  out  of  Narragansett  Bay.  In  1690  a  fleet  of 
seven  French  privateers  appeared  off  the  New  England 
coast,  capturing  Nantucket,  Martha's  Vineyard  and  Block 
Island.  Capt.  Paine  with  two  sloops  and  ninety  men  was 
sent  against  them.  Off  Block  Island  he  encountered  five  of 
them  and,  though  greatly  outnumbered,  engaged  the 
enemy  until  night  separated  them.  The  next  day  the  French 
put  to  sea,  but  Capt.  Paine  gave  chase  and  compelled  them 
to  sink  a  prize  loaded  with  wines  and  brandy. 

From  the  records  it  would  seem  that  Capt.  Paine  did  a 
little  privateering  on  his  own  account.  He  was  an  intimate 
friend  of  the  famous  Capt.  Kidd,  who  visited  him  at  James- 
town.1 Lord  Bellemont's  journal  for  Sept.  26,  1699,  reads: 
"I  also  examined  Capt'n  Thomas  Paine  ( formerly  a  pirate) 
upon  his  oath,  relating  to  goods  or  treasure,  imported  by 
Capt'n  William  Kidd,  and  reported  to  be  left  by  Kidd  with 
the  said  Paine."  This  same  year,  when  Capt.  Kidd  and  his 
wife  were  imprisoned  in  Boston,  Mrs.  Kidd  wrote  to  Capt. 
Paine  requesting  him  to  give  the  bearer  twenty-four  ounces 
of  gold  for  their  support  while  in  jail.  In  spite  of  the  fore- 
going, Capt.  Paine  was  a  captain  in  the  commissioned  offi- 
cers of  the  town  and  Dr.  McSparron  occasionally  held 
services  of  the  Church  of  England  at  his  house.  When 
John  J.  Watson  owned  this  farm,  he  started  the  "Social 
Library"  in  1870.  This  was  the  first  library  in  the  town, 
and  until  recent  years  the  list  of  books  was  still  pasted  on 
the  door  of  the  cupboard  where  the  books  were  kept. 

About  half  way  between  the  Greene  farmhouse  and  the 


JR.  I.  Hist.  Soc.  Coll.  XV,  97,  and  XXIII,  19. 


52  RHODE  ISLAM)  HISTORICAL  SOCIETY 

Edward  Carr  house  is  the  Carr  homestead,  built  in  1  776  by 
Nicholas  Carr,  grandson  of  Governor  Caleb  Carr.  This  is 
the  oldest  house  on  the  island  which  still  remains  as  it  was 
originally  built.  It  also  has  the  unique  distinction  of  always 
having  been  owned  and  inhabited  by  descendants  of  the 
builder.  The  house  is  built  around  a  huge  chimney  having 
six  fireplaces,  one  of  which  has  the  baking  oven,  the  great 
cranes  and  the  iron  cooking  kettles.  The  old  grandfather's 
clock,  which  Nicholas  bought  of  Thomas  Clagget  the  year 
he  built  the  house,  still  stands  in  the  southeast  corner  of  the 
east  front  room,  accurately  ticking  off  the  seconds,  and  its 
silvery  chime  is  but  an  echo  of  the  happiness  which  this  old 
house  has  seen.  Nicholas  must  have  had  faith  in  his  country 
for  he  built  his  house  in  troublous  times,  —  among  the 
objects  in  the  museum  ( formerly  the  glass  doored  china 
closet  in  the  parlor )  is  a  cannon  ball  which  was  shot  through 
the  southeast  corner  of  the  house  under  the  eaves  by  a 
British  man-of-war.  A  story  is  told  of  an  encounter  Nicholas 
had  with  the  captain  of  one  of  the  British  war  vessels.  He 
was  plowing  one  day  when  this  captain  appeared  and 
ordered  him  to  give  up  his  oxen.  No  attention  being  paid 
the  captain  drew  his  sword  and  struck  Nicholas  a  blow  on 
the  head.  Quaker  though  he  was,  Nicholas  started  in  to 
defend  his  rights  and  soon  a  much  battered  British  captain 
cried  for  quarter.  Later  in  the  day  a  file  of  marines  seized 
the  fighting  Quaker  and  took  him,  a  prisoner  in  irons,  on 
board  the  ship.  Each  morning,  for  three  days,  he  was 
brought  on  deck  with  a  rope  around  his  neck  and  given  his 
choice  of  getting  down  on  his  knees  and  kissing  the  hand  of 
a  loyal  subject  of  the  king,  or  of  being  hanged.  William 
Battey  and  another  Tory  named  Hull,  friends  and  neigh- 
bors of  Nicholas,  went  aboard  the  ship  and  pleaded  for  their 
friend,  who  was  finally  liberated.  This  "1776  House11  is 
mie  of  the  most  picturesque  places  on  the  island. 

Another  interesting  structure  is  the  lighthouse  at  Beaver 
Tail.  According  to  the  records  of  the  Department  of  Com- 
merce, the  first  lighthouse  on  the  continent  was  built  on 


CSi*d40 


%    /  /    / 


PACKET  SHIP  "RISING 

from  a  drawing  dan 


^l&nwoont. 


fMrna 


S/0     > 


OF  PROVIDENCE 

mber  9,  1812 


From  original  owned  by  C.  Prescott  Knight,  Esq. 


HISTORY  OF  JAMESTOWN  53 

Little  Brewster  Island,  at  the  entrance  to  Boston  Harbor, 
in  1  7 1 5- 1 6  by  the  order  and  at  the  expense  of  the  General 
Court  of  the  Province  of  Massachusetts  Bay,  being  first 
lighted  September  14,  1716,  old  style. 

The  first  real  lighthouse  on  Conanicut,  recognized  as 
such,  was  built  at  Beaver  Tail  in  1  749.  But  in  the  Proprie- 
tors Records  for  the  10th  day  of  the  second  month,  1705, 
it  was  ordered  "that  there  shall  be  a  chimney  built  to  the 
Watch  house  of  Beaver  Tail."  Again  on  the  9th  day  of 
June,  1712,  "At  a  meeting  of  the  Town  Counsell  called  by 
the  Governors  order  to  sett  a  watch  and  build  a  Beacon.  It 
is  ordered  that  John  Hull  grant  a  warrant  to  Gershom 
Remington  to  warn  the  Indians  to  build  a  beacon  as  soon  as 
possible.  It  is  further  ordered  that  John  Hull  grant  forth 
a  warrent  to  Benedict  Arnold  to  look  after  the  Watch  and 
see  that  it  be.  faithfully  kept."  In  those  days,  ship  building 
and  shipping  was  the  principal  industry  around  the  shores 
of  Narragansett  Bay,  and  while  undoubtedly  this  watch  and 
beacon  were  primarily  established  to  warn  against  attack 
from  the  sea,  it  seems  reasonable  to  believe  that  they  might 
have  been  used  for  the  benefit  of  outgoing  and  incoming 
vessels  also.  In  which  case  it  could  be  claimed  that  Beaver 
Tail  was  the  first  lighthouse. 

Another  of  the  interesting  old  land  marks  is  the  Wind 
Mill,  which  stands  on  Wind  Mill  Hill  near  the  center  of 
the  northern  half  of  the  island.  This  mil],  however,  is  the 
third  and  possibly  the  fourth  mill  that  was  built.  Corn  is 
native  to  this  country,  and  was  unknown  to  Europe  until 
after  America  had  become  settled.  It  was  the  first  gift  to  the 
white  men  by  the  Indians  and  immediately  became  the 
chief  article  of  diet.  To  be  usable  it  had  to  be  ground.  This 
the  Indians  did  by  hand,  but  the  inventive  genius  of  the 
white  man  early  developed  the  water  mill  and  later  the 
wind  mill,  the  one  in  Newport  being  built  in  1 663.  It  was  a 
long  journey  from  Jamestown  to  Newport  and  the  building 
of  a  mill  on  the  island  must  have  been  an  early  considera- 
tion, but  when  or  where  the  first  mill  was  built  is  still 


54  RHODE  ISLAM)  HISTORICAL  SOCIETY 

unknown.  On  North  Ferry  Road,  on  a  high  hill,  stands  an 
old  house  the  front  door  step  of  which  is  an  old  mill  stone, 
and  it  is  probable  that  the  first  mill  was  in  that  immediate 
vicinity.  However,  the  first  record  of  a  mill  is  in  1728, 
when  the  Town  Meeting  voted  that  "Richard  Tew  and 
David  Green  go  and  buy  stores  and  irons  for  the  building 
of  a  wind-mill  and  that  Richard  Tew  and  Thomas  Carr 
Provide  lumber  for  the  aforesaid  mill."  The  mill  was 
running  in  1730.  In  1738  it  was  voted  that  Nicholas  Can- 
have  the  mill  for  his  own  proper  estate,  but  in  1742  it  was 
voted  "that  Gershan  Remington  and  John  Martin  is 
apinted  to  talk  to  Nicholas  Carr  to  keep  the  mill  in 
Repare."  Nicholas  had  moved  to  Newport  and  what 
happened  to  the  mill  is  unknown.  It  is  thought  to  have 
stood  somewhat  north  of  the  present  mill. 

It  is  evident  that  the  town  was  without  a  mill  in  1 760  for 
a  vote  to  build  a  new  mill  was  passed  in  the  negative.  It 
was  again  before  the  town  meeting  in  1768  and  was  again 
voted  down.  Not  until  1787  was  the  matter  again  consid- 
ered, when  a  committee  was  appointed  to  investigate  the 
cost.  They  proved  themselves  thrifty  men  by  petitioning 
the  General  Assembly  for  the  grant  of  a  part  of  Col.  Joseph 
Wanton's  farm  which  had  been  confiscated.  Wanton  was  a 
Tory  and  had  left  the  island  when  the  British  evacuated 
Newport.  The  petition  was  granted  and  the  town  was  given 
half  an  acre  for  this  purpose.  If,  however,  the  mill  became 
useless  or  unused  for  a  period  of  two  years,  the  land  was  to 
revert  to  the  state.  The  mill  was  built  and  part  of  the  money 
was  raised  by  the  sale  of  the  highways  "running  between 
the  North  Point  Farm  and  Jonathan  Hopkins'  and  Tidde- 
man  Hull's,  and  the  highway  running  through  Joseph 
Martin's  Farm." 

Jethro  Briggs  was  the  first  miller  and  was  required  to 
give  bond  in  money  or  "as  much  corn  as  one  hundred  dol- 
lars will  purchase."  Briggs  moved  to  Newport  in  1  793  and 
the  mill  was  without  a  miller.  In  1  795  it  was  sold  at  public 
auction  to  Benjamin  Carr,  but  evidently  he  never  took  pos- 


HISTORY  OF  JAMESTOWN  55 

session,  for  the  next  year  Briggs  sold  it  to  Nathan  Munroe 
for  301  Spanish  milled  dollars.  The  record  is  now  complete 
down  to  1893,  having  been  owned  by  ten  persons  in  that 
period.  The  highest  price,  $3,000,  was  paid  by  Isaac  W. 
Potter  in  1  874.  Thomas  A.  H.  Tefft  was  the  last  operating 
owner  and  his  brother  Jesse,  the  last  miller  (  1  896  ). 

The  mill  remained  idle  for  many  years  and  was  fast  fall- 
ing to  decay.  In  1904,  through  the  instrumentality  of  Mrs. 
Frank  H.  Rosengarten  and  a  number  of  the  summer  resi- 
dents and  the  residents  of  the  Carr  Homestead,  money  was 
raised  and  an  informal  Wind  Mill  Society  was  formed.  The 
deed  was  retained  by  Mrs.  Rosengarten  until  1912,  when 
the  Historical  Society,  first  proposed  by  Mrs.  Elizabeth 
Carr  Locke  of  Los  Angeles,  was  formed.  The  two  societies 
combined  under  the  name  of  the  Jamestown  Historical 
Society,  with  Miss  Lena  H.  Clarke  as  the  first  president. 
The  old  mill  is  now  in  almost  complete  repair,  although  is 
not  as  yet  in  such  mechanical  condition  as  to  be  in  actual 
operation. 

Turning  from  the  commercial  to  the  spiritual,  we  have 
the  Quaker  Meeting  House.  Here  again  we  must  go  back 
many  years  before  the  present  building.  When  the  compact 
of  government  was  drawn  up  for  the  settlement  at  Pocasset, 
it  read  in  part:  "It  is  ordered  that  none  shall  be  accounted 
a  delinquent  for  doctrine,"  and  so  well  was  this  observed 
that  Cotton  Mather  said,  "I  believe  there  never  was  held 
such  a  variety  of  religions  together  on  such  a  small  spot  of 
ground — if  a  man  had  lost  his  religion  he  might  find  it  at 
the  general  muster  of  the  opinionists."  About  1 648,  George 
Fox  founded  the  Society  of  Friends  in  England  and,  in 
spite  of  persecution  and  imprisonment,  the  society  grew  in 
numbers  and  were  zealous  in  spreading  their  belief.  In  this 
country  the  only  welcoming  hand  was  extended  by  New- 
port; even  Roger  Williams  was  active  against  them.  As 
early  as  1656,  Quakers  had  become  settled  in  Newport. 
Fox  himself  preached  there  in  1 672,  and  by  1  700  Quaker- 
ism had  affected  the  entire  population  of  the  island.  The 


56  RHODE  [SLAND  HISTORICAL  SOCIETY 

leading  citizens  were  active  members  of  the  society.  As  a 
natural  consequence  the  large  majority  of  the  settlers  of 
Jamestown  were  Quakers.  The  attendance  at  the  Newport 
Meetings  was  infrequent  and  meetings  were  soon  held  at 
members'  houses.  An  entry  in  the  Newport  Meeting  rec- 
ords reads,  "At  a  man  and  womens  meeting  at  ye  house  of 
Mathew  Borden  the  24th  Day  12  mo,  1684  this  meeting 
has  thought  fit  with  the  approbation  of  Jamestown  alias 
Quononoquott  to  sett  a  quarterly  meeting  at  Nicholas  Carrs 
in  said  town  to  begin  the  second  day  after  our  monthly 
meeting  in  the  first  month  next."  In  1693  Thomas  Chalk- 
ley  preached  on  Jamestown.  For  the  "14th  of  4th  mo  1  709" 
the  Newport  records  read,  "it  was  proposed  at  this  meeting 
by  Representatives  of  Jamestown  yt  there  is  necessity  of 
building  a  meeting  house  at  Jamestown  which  is  referred 
to  next  monthly  meeting."  The  records  for  the  meeting 
read,  "ye  9th  day  e  6  mo.  1709.  This  meeting  doth  give 
leave  for  the  friends  of  Jamestown  to  build  a  meeting 
house  on  their  island." 

In  the  Land  Evidence  records  for  1  7 1  0  there  is  recorded 
a  deed  of  the  "land  on  which  a  meeting  house  stands  in 
which  the  people  called  Quakers  usually  meet."  This  defi- 
nitely establishes  that  the  first  meeting  house  was  built 
1709-10.  Also  by  this  deed  the  location  is  established  on 
the  north  side  of  North  Ferry  Road,  now  Cemetery  Lane, 
in  what  is  now  known  as  the  old  cemetery.  A  few  years  ago 
funds  were  raised  to  clear  up  this  old  cemetery,  which  was 
al  1  overgrown  with  brush  and  trees.  After  this  was  done  and 
the  old  grave  stones  set  up  and  repaired,  there,  in  the  south 
east  corner,  directly  in  front  of  the  entrance,  was  a  clear 
space,  entirely  free  from  graves,  where,  undoubtedly,  stood 
this  first  meeting  house. 

The  next  twenty-three  years  passed  without  anything  of 
particular  interest  except  the  general  growth  of  the  settle- 
ment. It  has  been  previously  noted  that,  as  the  numbers  on 
the  island  increased,  the  center  of  population  crept  towards 


HISTORY  OF  JAMESTOWN  57 

the  south.  This  brought  about  the  next  change  which  is  best 
told  by  the  records  themselves. 

25  of  the  10  mo  1733 

"This  meeting  having  had  futher  conference  concerning  Jamestown 
meeting  house,  it  is  desired  that  the  friends  of  that  town  do  consider 
among  themselves  whether  it  may  not  be  for  the  General  Service  and 
Benefit  to  Remove  s'd  meeting  house  or  dispose  of  that  and  build  another 
at  some  other  more  convenient  place  and  make  a  full  return  of  their  minds 
in  that  matter  to  our  next  Mo  meeting  and  David  Green  is  desired  to 
acquaint  the  friends  of  Jamestown  accordingly." 

Newport  29th  ye  1  1th  mo  1733 

"This  meeting  being  informed  that  the  persons  that  the  deed  of  James- 
town meeting  house  was  made  to,  are  all  deceased  excepting  David  Green 
therefore  this  meeting  doth  desire  David  Green  to  make  a  deed  of  Con- 
veyance of  s'd  house  &  the  land  belonging  thereto  to  Daniel  Weeden, 
John  Hull,  Tho  Carr  and  David  Green  Jr.  and  make  report  to  next 
monthly  meeting. 

"Whereas  Jamestown  friends  are  desirous  to  build  a  new  meeting 
house  on  their  Island  and  Nicholas  Carr  signified  that  he  is  willing  to 
give  as  much  land  as  is  needful  for  that  purpose  and  this  meeting  desires 
said  Nicholas  Carr  to  pass  a  deed  of  conveyance  for  the  s'd  purpose  to 
Sam'l  Clarke,  Daniel  Weeden,  Tho  Carr  and  John  Hull  and  make  report 
to  next  Mo  meeting." 

Newport  26th  da  1  mo  1734 

"Sam'l  Clarke  makes  report  that  Nicholas  Carr  hath'  passed  a  deed  of 
conveyance  of  a  quarter  of  an  acre  at  Jamestown  to  set  a  new  meeting 
house  on,  to  the  Persons  nominated  at  a  former  Mo.  meeting." 

Portsmouth  27th  ve  6  mo  1734 

"This  meeting  doth  desire  Sam'l  Clarke  and  Nicholas  Carr  to  Remove 
the  old  meeting  house  at  Jamestown  to  the  place  where  is  appointed  to 
build  the  new  meeting  house  and  to  build  an  addition  or  1  8  foot  leantew 
fashion  with  a  chimney  at  the  end  and  see  what  subscription  they  can  get 
and  make  report  to  our  next  Mo.  meeting." 

Newport  26th  of  the  9th  mo.   1734 

"Nicholas  Carr  and  Sam'l  Clarke  brought  an  acc't  of  charge  for  moving 
&  building  their  meeting  house  amounting  to  £114  -  4  -  10  which  is 
allowed  and  ordered  to  be  paid  by  John  Casey  out  of  the  meeting  stock." 


58  RHODE  ISLAM)  HISTORICAL  SOCIETY 

The  deed  of  Nicholas  Carr  appears  in  the  Land  Evidence 
Records  for  March  31,1  734,  and  by  the  boundaries  given, 
we  find  the  land  is  that  on  which  the  present  meeting  house 
stands.  Peace  and  contentment  reigned  for  many  years.  But 
in  1775  the  British  fleet  sailed  into  the  harbor  and  took 
possession  of  Newport  and  the  fortified  parts  of  Jamestown. 
This  critical  period  in  the  history  of  the  island  will  be  taken 
up  later.  The  effect  of  this  occupation  on  the  meeting  house 
is  again  best  told  by  the  records. 

Newport  26th.  3  mo  1  776 

"This  meeting  being  informed  that  Friends  have  mostly  moved  from 
Jamestown  therefore  this  meeting  doth  appoint  Gould  Marsh  &  Thomas 
Gould  Jun.  to  inquire  into  circumstances  of  S'd  Friends  &  the  meeting 
there  &  report  to  next  monthly  meeting." 

Newport  28th  5  mo  1776 

"The  Friends  who  had  the  care  of  the  matter  respecting  friends  at 
Jamestown  made  return  which  is  accepted  as  followetli: 

Newport  5  of  the  5  mo  1776 

"Agreeable  to  appointment  we  have  made  some  inquiry  respecting  the 
Meeting  &  Meeting  House  of  Friends  at  Jamestown  and  were  informed 
that  some  time  in  the  tenth  month  that  most  friends  belonging  thereto 
left  the  Island  whereby  the  meeting  ceased  and  that  the  soldiers  possessed 
themselves  of  the  House  which  suffered  considerably  from  them  in  which 
condition  it  still  remains  and  but  one  family  of  friends  as  vet  returned  and 
settled  on  the  Island." 

Newport  25  of  7  mo  1776 

"The  Preparative  Meeting  of  Newport  informed  that  Friends  at 
Jamestown  had  represented  to  them  that  they  have  for  some  time  past 
laboured  under  some  disadvantage  in  regard  to  holding  their  Meeting  at 
Private  Houses  and  proposed  for  Friends  approbation  for  their  better 
accommodation  whereupon  we  appoint  Robert  Dennis,  Isaac  Lawton, 
Richard  Mitchell,  Gould  Marsh  and  William  Almv  to  confer  with 
Friends  at  Jamestown  aforesaid,  respecting  the  above." 

Newport  26th  of  9th  mo  1  786 
The   committee    appointed    to   confer   with    friends   at 


HISTORY  OF  JAMESTOWN  59 

James  Town  respecting  the  Building  a  Meeting  House 
reported  as  follows,  viz, 

"According  to  our  appointment,  we  have  conferred  with  the  Friends 
of  Jamestown  respecting  building  a  Meeting  house  at  that  place,  and  it  is 
our  Judgement  that  it  may  be  well  that  there  be  one  built,  provided  that 
it  can  be  accomplished  in  the  way  by  them  proposed  viz  to  procure 
Mon'ies  by  subscription  to  purchase  the  material  and  to  do  the  Labour  at 
their  own  expense  And  thin^;  that  a  building  26  ft.  by  20  of  one  story 
high,  sufficiently  capacious  to  accommodate  them." 
(To  be  continued) 


Genealogical  Notes 

By  Edward  H.  West 

DANIEL  WILCOX 

Who  was  the  first  wife  of  Daniel  Wilcox?  Elizabeth 
Cook  must  have  been  his  second  wife,  for  in  the  deed  to 
Edward  Lay  in  1661,  he  reserved  a  rod  of  land  for  the 
grave  of  his  buried  wife. 

In  a  corner  of  a  jog  of  land  just  north  of  this  land  are 
three  unmarked  grave  stones.  I  do  not  think  that  they  are 
Wilcox  stones,  but  in  the  wall,  where  they  have  been  moved 
from  the  middle  of  the  lot,  are  three  fragments  of  stones. 
On  one  of  them  is  the  inscription 

"Samwell  Wilcock  1689." 

I  think  it  possible  that  Daniel  Wilcox  (2)  was  the  son 
of  the  first  wife.* 

THOMAS  COOK  OF   PORTSMOUTH 

This  article  is  to  show  that  the  names  of  the  wives  of 
Thomas  Cook,  Sr.,  and  of  his  son,  Capt.  Thomas  Cook,  as 


*The  same  conclusion  is  reached  by  G.  Andrews  Moriarty  in  the 
N.  E.  H.&G.  Reg.,  Jan.  1933,  p.  74,  wherein  he  quotes  from  R.  I.  H.  S. 
Collections  of  July  1932. 


60  RHODE  ISLAND  HISTORICAL  SOCIETY 

given  by  Austin  and  other  Cook  lists  are  not  correct;  also, 
there  is  to  be  a  change  in  the  children. 

Thomas  Cook,  Sr.,  in  his  will,  left  the  daughters  of  his 
dec.  son,  Thomas  Cook,  14  pounds  apiece,  his  Exx.  to  be 
wife  Mary  (his  2nd  wife). 

In  1693  (L.  E.  I. -307)  Oliver  Arnold  gave  receipt  to 
Jeremiah  Brown  of  Newport,  now  husband  of  Mary,  late 
widow  of  the  dec.  Thomas  Cook,  for  the  sum  of  1  5  pounds, 
the  legacy  left  said  Arnold's  wife,  Phebe,  by  the  will  of  her 
g-father,  Thomas  Cook. 

Thomas  Cook,  Sr.,  must  have  been  at  least  64  years  of 
age  at  the  time  of  his  death,  going  by  the  birth  date  of  his 
son  John  (  163  1  ). 

His  2nd  wife,  Mary,  must  have  been  much  younger,  as 
she  married  again  after  his  death  in  1674,  and  was  living 
in  1692. 

The  will  of  William  Havens  mentions  his  daughter, 
Mary  Cook.  She  must  have  been  born  about  1655,  as  her 
older  brother,  George,  was  born  in  1653.  This  would  make 
her  age  compare  with  the  above  condition,  and  what  follows 
shows  that  she  was  not  the  wife  of  Capt.  Thomas,  as  he  had 
wife  Thomasin  and  not  Mary. 

12  Oct.  1670,  "Whereas  Capt.  Thomas  Cook  of  Ports- 
mouth late  deceased  and  left  a  verbal  will leaving 

his  wife  Exx.  and  she  in  her  lifetime  time  not  aplying  her 
self  according  to  law  to  prove  sayd  will  was  thereby  incap- 
sitated  to  make  a  will  for  the  Disposal  of  her  sayd  Husbands 
Estate  -  -  whereupon  the  eldist  son  and  Heir    of 

the  dec.  Capt.  Thomas  Cook  having  aplyed  himself  unto 
us  the  Counsell  of  the  Town  of  Portsmouth,  for  our  assist- 
ance in  the  setling  of  his  dec.  fathers  Estate  -  Wee 
have  and  do  hereby  apoynt  Thomas  Cook,  eldist  son  of  the 
afore  named  Capt.  Thomas  Cook,  to  be  the  whole  and  sole 
Exicutor  unto  the  whole  Estate  of  the  Sayd  Capt.  Thomas 
Cook  and  the  late  Deceased  widow  Thomasin  Cook." 


GENEALOGICAL  NOTES  61 

"Said  Thomas  to  have  the  whole  estate,  he  paying  all 
debts  of  his  deceased  parents  as  well  as  the  following 
legacies. 

" shall  pay  unto  his  brothers  namely  John,  George, 

Steven  and  Ebenezer  Cook  to  each  of  them at  the 

age  of  20  years  10  s. 

"We  also  order  that  the  said  Thomas  Cook  shall  pay 
unto  his  sisters,  namely  Sarah,  the  wife  of  Peter  Parker, 
Mary  the  wife  of  Thomas  Langford,  Elizabeth,  Phebe, 
and  Martha  Cook,  to  each  5  s  apiece." 

This  shows  that  Sarah  was  not  the  daughter  of 
Thomas,  Sr. 

Also  it  gives  another  Cook  daughter,  Mary  Langford. 

In  a  deposition  of  Thomas  Cook  taken  in  Newport, 
22  July  1719,  about  the  estates  of  Isaac  and  Thomas  Law- 
ton,  he  calls  himself  62  years  or  thereabouts,  which  would 
make  his  birth  about  1657. 

(  Loose  Paper,  State  House. ) 

Mary  Langford's  will  mentions  her  husband's  child  and 
gives  its  some  clothes  that  were  its  own  mother's.  She  also 
mentions  sister  Sarah  Parker  and  her  brother  Thomas. 
(Scrap  Book,  Portsmouth. ) 

The  will  of  Thomas  Langford  makes  wife  Mary  sole 
Exx.,  and  he  also  "gives  my  whole  estate  with  the 
power  and  taking  care  of  my  son  Thomas."  (Scrap  Book) 
He  does  not  mention  the  son  John  that  Austin  gives  him. 

Inventory  of  the  goods  of  Mary  Langford  "who 
departed  this  life  on  the  1 7  day  of  feb  1 670."  (  Scrap  Book) 


New  Publications  of  Rhode  Island  Interest 

Notes  on  the  Rhode  Island  Admiralty ,  1727-1790,  by 
Frederick  Bernays  Wiener,  is  a  pamphlet  reprinted  from 
The  Harvard  Law  Review,  1932,  vol.  XLVI,  No.  1. 


62  RHODE  ISLAND  HISTORICAL  SOCIETY 

The  June  1932  Bulletin  of  the  Jamestown  Historical 
Society  contains  an  article  on  Old  Jamestown  by  Maria  A. 
Carr. 

A  Spaniard's  Visit  to  Newport  in  1784,  a  translation 
by  Don  Juan  de  Riano  of  Francisco  Miranda's  diary,  is 
printed  in  the  October  1932  Bulletin  of  the  Newport  His- 
torical Society. 

The  Auchmuty  Family  of  Scotland  and  America  by 
Annette  Townsend  contains  a  biographical  sketch  and  por- 
trait of  Judge  Robert  Auchmuty. 

Carrie  Tower,  a  poem  by  Harry  Paul  Taylor,  illustrated 
by  Stacy  Tolman,  East  Providence,  1932,  was  printed  as  a 
pamphlet. 

A  Map  of  the  Acquidnesset  or  North  Purchase  of  the 
Atherton  Partners  is  the  title  of  a  pamphlet  issued  in 
December  by  the  Society  of  Colonial  Wars  in  the  State  of 
Rhode  Island. 

Sheffield,  Daggett  and  Allied  Families  is  an  illustrated 
volume  of  273  pages,  issued  by  the  American  Historical 
Society. 

A  biography  of  John  Underhill  by  Henry  C.  Shelley 
contains  several  references  to  colonial  Rhode  Island. 

The  Journal  of  American  History  for  1932  contains  an 
article  on  The  Rock-Inscriptions  of  New  England  — 
Miguel  Cortereal  in  Massachusetts,  1511,  by  Edmund 
Burke  Delabarre. 

Kingston  Congregational  Church,  History,  By-Laws, 
Membership  is  a  pamphlet  of  20  pages  issued  in  Novem- 
ber 1932. 

Volume  III  of  Documents  Illustrative  of  the  History  of 
the  Slave  Trade  in  America  by  Elizabeth  Donnan,  which 
has  just  been  published  by  the  Carnegie  Institution,  contains 
553  pages,  of  which  296  pages  relate  to  the  Rhode  Island 
slave  trade. 


NEW  PUBLICATIONS  OF  R.  I.  INTEREST  63 

The  Official  Gazetteer  of  Rhode  Island  is  a  pamphlet  of 
95  pages  recently  issued  by  the  United  States  Geographic 
Board. 

Supplement  to  Ralph  Earle  and  His  Descendants  is  a 
pamphlet  of  12  pages  by  Amos  Earle  Voorhies,  printed  at 
Grants  Pass,  Oregon. 

House  and  Garden  for  December  1932  contains  an 
article  by  Walter  A.  Dyer  on  Old  Tavern  Signs,  illustrated 
with  pictures  of  signs  exhibited  some  years  ago  at  the  loan 
exhibition  held  by  the  Rhode  Island  Historical  Society. 

The  New  England  Historical  and  Genealogical  Register 
for  January  1933  contains  several  important  genealogical 
articles  relating  to  several  Rhode  Island  families,  viz: 
Cranston,  Fiske,  Chase,  Ginnedo  and  Mowry. 

Notes 

Mrs.  Murray  S.  Danforth  presented  to  the  Society  a 
manuscript  music  book  containing  compositions  by  Oliver 
Shaw,  the  Rhode  Island  composer,  in  his  own  hand  writing. 

Miss  Theodora  Wilbour  of  New  York  presented  to  the 
Society  a  collection  of  one  hundred  and  eighty-nine  pieces 
of  early  glassware  as  a  memorial  in  honor  of  her  sister, 
Zoe  Wilbour. 

The  following  persons  have  been  elected  to  membership 
in  the  Society: 

Prof.  Will  S.  Taylor  Rev.  William  Worthington 

Mrs.  Earl  C.  Hart  Miss  Anna  Jones  Dyer 

Survey  of  Old  Rhode  Island  Houses 

Old  Houses  in  the  South  County  of  Rhode  Island,  Part  I, 
compiled  by  the  Society  of  Colonial  Dames  in  the  State  of 
Rhode  Island  and  Providence  Plantations,  and  printed  by 
the  Merrymount  Press,  contains  93  photographs,  with  de- 
scriptive and  historic  notes,  of  the  exterior  and  the  interior 


64  RHODE  ISLAND  HISTORICAL  SOCIETY 

of  53  houses  built  prior  to  1830,  situated  in  the  southern 
portion  of  the  present  Washington  County ;  together  with 
an  introduction  by  William  Davis  Miller,  South  County 
Notes  by  Mrs.  William  B.  Weeden,  a  map  of  the  Petta- 
quamscutt  Purchase  and  two  maps  by  Norman  M.  Isham 
showing  the  location  of  the  houses  described,  together  with 
the  sites  of  houses  long  demolished. 

This  pictorial  and  written  record  of  social  conditions  and 
architectural  development  of  the  early  days  of  this  portion 
of  the  State  is  of  inestimable  value  both  to  the  student  and 
to  those  interested  in  the  colonial  period  of  Rhode  Island. 
It  is  to  be  hoped  that  the  subsequent  volumes,  covering  the 
remainder  of  the  South  County  and  other  portions  of  the 
State,  will  be  published  in  the  not  far  distant  future,  so  that 
an  authoritative  and  comprehensive  record  of  our  early 
houses  may  be  accessible  to  future  generations,  when  land 
marks  of  today  will  be  but  historic  record.  The  Society  of 
Colonial  Dames  is  to  be  congratulated  for  this  book,  the 
first  published  evidence  of  the  exhaustive  survey  it  has 
undertaken. 

Glocester,  R.  I. 

By  Howard  M.  Chapin 

The  question  is  often  asked  why  Glocester,  R.  I.,  is 
spelled  without  the  "u,"  while  Gloucester,  in  England  and 
in  Massachusetts,  is  spelled  with  the  "u."  In  the  seven- 
teenth and  eighteenth  centuries  spelling  was  not  as  crystal- 
lized in  form  as  it  is  today,  and  it  was  not  only  customary 
but  proper  to  spell  many  proper  names  in  more  than  one 
way. 

In  the  Index  V Maris  written  by  Mr.  Adams  of  the  Inner- 
Temple  and  printed  in  London  in  1680  the  County  of 
Glocester,  the  city  of  Glocester,  Glocester  Hall  in  Oxford 
and  Glocester  in  Northumberland,  all  in  England,  were 
spelled  without  the  "u." 


GLOCESTER,  R.  I.  65 

Five  pamphlets  written  by  Josiah  Tucker,  Dean  of 
Glocester  and  printed  at  Glocester,  England,  between  1775 
and  1 783  give  the  spelling  without  the  "u." 

In  a  pamphlet  printed  in  London  in  1 740  Gloucester  is 
spelled  with  the  "u,"  but  in  a  book  printed  in  Glocester, 
England,  in  1 764,  the  name  is  spelled  without  the  "u." 

William  Dugdale,  Norroy  King  of  Arms,  in  his  monu- 
mental work,  The  Baronage  of  England,  printed  in  1675, 
spelled  Glocester  without  the  "u"  in  his  account  of  the 
earldom. 

In  the  first  quarto  edition  of  Shakespeare's  Richard  III, 
which  was  printed  in  1597,  Glocester  is  spelled  without 
the  "u." 

It  will  thus  be  seen  that  the  spelling  without  the  "u" 
was  the  preferable  spelling  in  the  sixteenth  and  seventeenth 
centuries  in  England,  and  that  when  the  spelling  with  the 
"u"  became  fashionable  in  eighteenth  century  London,  the 
other  spelling  persisted  for  a  long  time  in  local  usage. 
When  Glocester,  R.  I.,  was  named  in  1730,  the  spelling 
without  the  "u"  which  was  adopted  would  seem  to  have 
had  in  its  favor  the  weight  of  the  precedence  of  historical 
and  literary  usage  and  authority. 

Rhode  Island  Historical  Society 
Treasurer's  Report 

INCOME  ACCOUNT  FOR  YEAR   1932 


Receipts 

Annual  Dues $2,725.00 

Dividends  and  Interest 4  196.29 

Newspaper  Account   31.50 

Rental  of  Rooms 105.00 

State  Appropriation 1,500.00 

Surplus  Income  Account ]  30.00 

$8,687.79 


66  RHODE  ISLAND  HISTORICAL  SOCIETY 

Expenditures 

Binding    $     384.63 

Books   629.70 

Electric  Light  and  Gas 44.95 

Exhibitions  104.92 

Expense    1  85.62 

Grounds  and  Building 43.45 

Heating    700.00 

Insurance    225.00 

Publication  460.28 

Salaries  5,580.00 

Supplies    251.49 

Telephone    69.75 

Water     8.00 


$8,687.79 
STATEMENT  OF  CONDITION,  DECEMBER   31,    1932 


Assets 

Grounds  and  Building $    2  5,000.00 

Investments: 

Bonds 

$4,(100.   Cedars  Rapids  M.  &  P.  Co.,  5s,  195  3    $3,228.88 

3,000.   Central    Mfg.   District 3,000.00 

3,000.   Cleveland  Elec.  Ilium.  Co.,  5s,  1939 ...    2,565.42 

4,000.   Dominion  of  Canada,  5s,  1952 4,003.91 

1,000.   Western  Electric  Co.,  5s,   1944 998.17 

4,000.   61   Broadway  Bldg.,  1st  Mtge.,  5>^s, 

1950    ' 4,000.00 

4,000.  Minnesota  P.  &  Lt.  Co.,  1st  5s,  1955 ...  3,930.00 
4,000.    Monongahela  Valley  Traction  Co.,  1st 

5s,  1942  ' 3,685.00 

2,000.   Ohio  Power  Co.,  1st  &  Ref.  5s,  1952  .    1,974.00 

2,000.   Narragansett  Elec.  Co.,  5s,  1947 1,980.00 

2,000.   Shell  Union  Oil  Corp.,  5s,  1947 1,979.00 

2,000.   Koppers  Gas  &  Coke  Co.,  5s,  1947  1,962.50 

1,000.  Indianapolis  Power  &  Lt.,  1st  5s,  1957  994.50 
1,000.  Texas  Pwr.  &  Lt.,  1st  Ref.  5s,  1956  1,021.2  5 
1,000.   Pennsylvania  R.  R.,  Deb.  4>^s,  1970  922.5  0 

1,000.    Pennsylvania  Water  &  Power  Co.,   1st 

5s,    1940    1,005.42 


TREASURER  S  REPORT  67 


Stoc 


KS 


54  shs.  New  York  Central  Railroad  Co $3,766.47 

125  shs.  Pennsylvania  Railroad  Co 7,638.35 

30  shs.  Lehigh  Valley  Railroad  Co 2,1  12.50 

7  shs.  Lehigh  Valley  Coal  Sales  Co. 23  5.39 

40  shs.  Milwaukee  Elec.  Ry.  &  Lt.  Co.,  Pfd. ...    3,900.00 
64  shs.  American  Telephone  &  Telegraph  Co.    5,960.05 

3  50  shs.  Providence  Gas  Cq 5,755.68 

1  5  shs.  Providence  National  Bank  ) 

30  shs.  Merchants'  National  Bank  Bldg.} MOO. 00 

45  shs.  Blackstone  Canal  National  Bank 1,050.00 

52  shs.  Atchison,  Topeka  &  S.F.  Ry.  Co.,  Com.   6,247.85 

20  shs.  American  Power  &  Light 1,696.50 

30  shs.  Standard  Gas  &  Electric,  4s,  Pfd 1,906.50 

3  5  shs.  Public  Service  of  N.  J.,  5s,  Pfd. 3,327.63 

1  0  shs.  Public  Service  of  N.  J.,  5s,  Cum.  Pfd. ...       990.00 
10  shs.  Electric  Bond  and  Share,  5s,  Pfd 922.00 

84,5  59.47 

Cash  on  hand  4.  ^Qg  ^5 


$113,968.12 


Liabilities 

Equipment  Fund  $   25,000.00 

Permanent  Endowment  Fund: 

Samuel  M.  Noyes $ \ 2,000.00 

Henry  J.  Steere 10,000.00 

James  H.  Bugbee 6,000.00 

Charles  H.  Smith 5  000.00 

William  H.  Potter 3,000.00 

Charles  W.   Parsons 4,000.00 

•     Esek  A.  Jillson 2,000.00 

John  Wilson  Smith 1  000.00 

William  G.  Weld 1,000.00 

Charles  C.  Hoskins 1 ,000.00 

Charles  H.  Atwood 1,000.00 

Edwin  P.  Anthony 4,000.00 

John  F.  Street 1,000.00 

George  L.  Shepley 5,000.00 

Franklin  Lyceum  Memorial 734.52 

56,734.52 


68  RHODK  ISLAM)  HISTORICAL  SOCIETY 

Publication  Fund: 

Robert  P.   Brown $    2,000.00 

Ira  P.  Peck 1 ,000.00 

William  Gammell  1 ,000.00 

Albert  |.  Jones 1,000.00 

William  Ely  1,000.00 

Julia  Bullock  500.00 

Charles  H.  Smith  100.00 

6,600.00 

Life  Membership  5,600.00 

Book  Fund  3,0  1  2.41 

Reserve  Fund  1 ,098.3  7 

Revolving  Publication  Fund 378.27 

Surplus  13,900.87 

Surplus  Income  Account 1 ,643.68 


$113,968.12 
PRINCIPAL  ACCOUNT  FOR  THE  YEAR   1932 


Receipts 


Commonwealth  Edison  Company  (Paid) $1,099.50 

Reserve  Fund  1  88.25 

Revolving  Publication  Fund 3  1  2.00 

Life  Membership  50.00 


$1,649.75 

Balance   January  1,  1932 2,765.89 


$4,415.64 


Payments 


Penn.  Water  &  Power  Co.,  1st,  5s,  1940  (Purchased) $1,00  5.42 

Reserve  Fund  1  05.25 

Revolving  Publication  Fund 540.00 

$1,650.67 
Balance  December  31,    1932 2,764.97 

$4,415.64 
Respectfully  submitted, 

G.  A.  Harrington, 

Treasurer 


Form  of  Legacy 


"/  give  and  bequeath  to  the  Rhode  Island 

Historical  Society  the  sum  of       

dollars. " 


Roger  Williams  Prlss         ^1}* 


E.  A.  Johnson  Co. 


providence 


Rhode  Island 

Historic aI  ^c i e t y 
Collections 


Vol.  XXVI 


JULY,  1933 


No.  3 


Issued  Quarterly 


68  Waterman  Street,  Providence,  Rhode  Island 


CONTENTS 


PAGE 

Rhode  Island  Historical  Society  Building  .  .       Cover 

The  Touch-Mark  of  Josiah  Keene 

by  Madelaine  R.  Brown,  M.D.     ...  69 

Biscuit  City 

by  William  Davis  Miller      ....  72 

New  Publications  of  Rhode  Island  Interest     .  .  78 

Notes 79 

A  Short  History  of  Jamestown 

by  W.L.Watson 79 

The  King  Tom  House  .  .  .  .  .  91 

Genealogical  Notes,  (Potter) 

by  Edward  H.  West 92 

The  Westconnaug  Purchase 

by  Theodore  G.  Foster  ....  94 

Heraldic  Note^ 

Illustrated  by  Harold  Bowditch     ...  98 


,,„FV;' '"*£..: 


RHODE 
HISTORICAL 


ISLAND 

SOCIETY 


COLLECTIONS 


Vol.  XXVI 


JULY,   1933 


No.  3 


William  Davis  Miller,  President   Gilbert  A.  Harrington,  Treasurer 
Howard  W.  Preston,  Secretary  Howard  M.  Chapin,  Librarian 


The  Society  assumes  no  responsibility  for  the  statements  or  the  opinions 
of  contributors. 


The  Touch-Mark  of  Josiah   Keenc, 
Rhode  Island  Pewterer,  1778  or  9-1868 

By  Madelaine  R.  Brown,  M.D. 

Until  the  plate  described  below  was  located  in  the 
autumn  of  1932,  no  example  of  Josiah  Keene's  larger 
touch-mark  was  known  to  collectors  of  American  pewter. 
A  pint  porringer  of  the  Rhode  Island  type,  marked 
"I.  K.,"  described  and  attributed  to  him  in  Mr.  Myer's 
"Notes,"  is  now  in  the  Yale  University  Museum.  From 
Mr.  Calder's  exhaustive  study  of  Rhode  Island  pewterers 
published  in  1924  by  this  quarterly,  we  know  that  Keene 
advertised  as  pewterer,  coppersmith  and  founder  in  the 
Providence  Gazette,  October  2,  1802.  The  same  author  has 
also  reproduced  a  receipt  given  William  Calder,  pewterer, 
by  Josiah  Keene  in  1817  for  seven  varieties  of  moulds, 
including  one  for  an  eight-inch  plate  and  one  for  a  pint 
porringer. 


THE  TOUCH-MARK  OF  JOSIAH    KEEXE  71 

This  SJ/i  inch  plate,  bearing  part  of  Keene's  touch,  is 
in  such  excellent  condition  that  it  could  have  been  used 
very  little.  It  is  evident,  therefore,  that  originally  this 
mark  was  only  partially  struck.  The  touch  is  similar  to 
that  of  Samuel  Hamlin,  and  from  the  accompanying  illus- 
tration it  will  be  seen  that  the  S}i  inch  plate  by  Gershom 
Jones  was  cast  in  an  indentical  mould,  and  that  by  William 
Calder  probably  in  the  same  mould. 


TOUCH-MARK    OF 
JOSIAH    KEENE 


The  scarcity  of  known  examples  of  Keene's  pewter 
to-day  may  possibly  be  explained  by  two  facts.  First,  his 
touch-mark  may  have  been  incompletely  struck  on  much 
of  his  ware.  Second,  as  Mr.  Laughlin  points  out  in  the 
article  on  Keene  from  the  manuscript  of  his  projected  book 
on  American  pewter,  which  he  has  kindly  sent  me,  Josiah 
Keene  was  essentially  a  coppersmith  and  brass  founder, 
making  pewter  only  in  the  first  few  years  of  his  business 
life,  and  finally  selling  his  moulds  in  1817. 


72  RHODE  ISLAND  HISTORICAL  SOCIETY 

Biscuit  City 

By  William  Davis  Miller 

Biscuit  City,  or  Harley's  Mill  as  it  is  sometimes  more 
accurately  but  less  picturesquely  called,  has  the  probable 
distinction  of  being  the  smallest  city  in  the  country.  The 
little  cluster  of  houses,  never  appearing  to  have  exceeded 
more  than  six  in  number  exclusive  of  the  mill,  grouped 
about  the  "Great  Spring"  and  the  stream  and  mill  pond 
fed  by  its  unfailing  flow,  lies  about  a  mile  to  the  southwest 
of  the  village  of  Kingston. 

The  origin  of  the  name  of  this  small  hamlet  is  obscure 
but  by  tradition,  and  as  recorded  by  Shepard  Tom  in  his 
Jonny  Cake  Papers,  it  sprang  from  the  imagination  of  an 
itinerant  vendor,  who,  upon  a  visit  to  the  little  community, 
was  so  impressed  by  the  remarkable  number  of  biscuits 
being  made  by  the  housewives,  that  he  dubbed  it  by  the 
name  it  has  ever  since  borne,  and  by  which  it  is  familiarly 
alluded  to  by  the  people  of  South  Kingstown. 

The  lands  upon  which  Biscuit  City  stood  were  in  the 
central  portion  of  that  great  tract  purchased  from  the  Nar- 
ragansett  Sachems  by  the  Pettaquamscutt  Purchasers  in 
1657.  They  in  turn  deeded  to  William  Knowles,  in  1671, 
five  hundred  acres  of  this  Purchase,  which  included  the 
lands  under  consideration.  The  Knowles  family  retained 
possession  until  12  April  1738  when  Henry  Knowles  sold 
two  hundred  acres  to  Col.  Elisha  Reynolds,  merchant  of 
Little  Rest.  The  following  year  Reynolds  purchased  an 
additional  four  hundred  acres  from  Henry  Knowles, 
apparently  the  remainder  of  Knowles  lands  in  that  vicinity. 
It  would  appear  that  this  last  purchase,  made  12  March 
1  739,  included  the  spring  and  stream.  In  this  deed  there  is 
mention  of  a  house  but  no  mention  of  a  mill,  the  house  being 
probably  that,  the  ruins  of  which  still  remain,  situated  a 
short  distance  to  the  northwest  of  the  mill  site. 


BISCUIT  CITY  73 

On  18  August  1788  Elisha  Reynolds  sold  sixteen  acres 
and  twenty-eight  rods  to  John  Larkin.  This  would  seem  to 
be  the  beginning  of  the  mercantile  era  of  the  "City,"  for 
while  the  deed  mentions  "a  dwelling  house  there  on  stand- 
ing," mentions  the  "Great  Spring  at  the  head  of  the  Mill 
Pond,"  and  gives  to  Larkin  right  to  "open  the  brook  that 
comes  from  Samuel  Tefts  land  across  sd  grantors  land" 
no  direct  mention  is  made  of  a  mill.  However  when,  on 
25  May  1795,  Larkin  sold  these  lands  to  John  Taylor 
Nichols,  the  saddler  of  Little  Rest,  whose  shop  adjoined  the 
old  Bank  in  the  village,  the  land  is  described  as  "with  a 
dwelling  house  and  a  Grist  Mill  thereon  standing."  Larkin 
bought  an  additional  four  acres  adjoining  his  land  on  the 
east  from  Elisha  Reynolds  in  1 79 1 . 

Nichols  operated  the  mill  less  than  two  years  selling  out 
to  Jonathan  .Babcock,  "Schoolmaster  alias  Yoeman,"  on 
21  February  1797.  Nichols,  however,  retained  the  upper 
portion  of  the  mill  pond  and  the  "Great  Spring"  but  bound 
himself  "Not  to  alter  the  course  or  Stop  the  water  which 
Runs  from  the  great  Spring  into  the  Mill  Pond  and  all 
other  water  Courses  which  Vent  it  Selfe  into  Said  Pond  and 
to  Drownd  as  much  of  the  land  which  Belongs  to  Said 
Nichols  as  May  happen  at  any  Uncommon  Rise  of  Water 
in  Said  Mill  Pond  from  Freshets  or  otherwise."  This 
upper  portion  of  the  land,  ten  acres,  Nichols  sold  to  Elisha 
Reynolds  Potter  in  1801  who  in  turn,  six  years  later,  sold 
two  acres  to  Babcock. 

In  1808,  Biscuit  City  reached  the  height  of  its  activity 
and  was  to  achieve  additional  distinction.  On  the  sixteenth 
of  March  of  that  year,  Jonathan  Babcock,  having  laid  aside 
his  title  of  "School  Master"  and  styling  himself  "Miller," 
sold  four  and  one-half  acres  and  twenty-five  rods  of  his 
land,  excluding  his  home,  the  old  house  mentioned  in  the 
earlier  deeds,  to  "The  President,  Directors  and  Company 
of  South  Kingstown  Cotton  Manufactury,"  said  to  be  the 
first  company  to  be  organized  in  the  United  States  for  the 
manufacture  of  cotton  cloth.    The  deed  recites  the  officers 


< 


I 

— 

w     Yi 

-* 

.  '  r 

"5 

!  ^ 

i  h  - 

_~ 

'  ' 

*  '- 

«P.. 

BISCUIT  CITY  75 

as  follows:  "James  Helme  President,  Rowland  Hazard, 
James  Shearman,  Cyrus  French,  William  Peckham." 

The  old  approach  to  Biscuit  City  and  the  mill  was  by  a 
right  of  way  across  the  lands  of  Elisha  Reynolds,  later  in 
possession  of  Elisha  Reynolds  Potter,  at  the  western  foot 
of  Little  Rest  Hill,  leaving  the  road  to  the  present  West 
Kingston  at  a  point  adjacent  to  where  that  road  crosses 
Whitehorn  Brook.  In  "1809,  Potter  deeded  "the  copart- 
ners &  proprietors  of  the  Cotton  Factory"  a  piece  of  land 
to  be  "used  and  occupied  as  a  road  or  public  highway  across 
the  lands  of  the  grantor"  the  consideration  being  that  the 
Company  release  the  old  right  of  way  to  Potter.  This  road 
was  laid  out  and  is  the  present  approach  to  Biscuit  City. 
This  deed  is  of  interest  as  it  gives  a  more  complete  list  of 
those  interested  in  the  South  Kingstown  Cotton  Manu- 
factury  ( alias  The  Cotton  Factory,  alias  the  Narragansett 
Cotton  Manufacturing  Company):  "Levi  Bradford, 
Hezekial  Babcock,  Jonathan  Babcock,  John  G.  Clarke, 
Cyrus  French,  Elisha  R.  Gardner,  Benjn  Greene,  Row- 
land Hazard,  James  Helme,  Joseph  M.  Knowles,  Robert 
Knowles,  Geo  Hazard,  John  T.  Nichols,  Wm.  Nichols, 
Wm.  Peckham,  Wm.  Peckham,  Jr.,  James  Sherman,  John 
R.  Sherman,  John  Segar,  Chr.  Robinson,  Borden  Rathbun, 
Benj"  Wright,  Elisha  Watson,  Jr.,  Jos.  Reynolds,  Benjn 
Congdon  &  John  C.  Helme  being  the  copartners  & 
proprietors — " 

For  eleven  years  the  Cotton  Factory,  to  use  the  shortest 
of  the  several  names,  would  appear  to  have  continued 
operation  with  diminishing  success,  and  then  sold,  on  2 
January  1819,  the  land  it  had  received  from  Babcock  to 
Rouse  C.  Clarke,  Jr.,  of  Richmond  "with  a  large  building 
thereon  with  water  wheels  &  other  wheels  &  gear  viz:  all 
the  geer  that  is  immediately  connected  with  the  wheels,  two 
dwelling  homes  &  other  out  buildings."  The  consideration 
the  Company  received  would  seem  indicative  of  their 
financial  condition.    It  was  "the  sum  of  two  thousand  dol- 


76 


RHODE  ISLAND  HISTORICAL  SOCIETY 


^ 


biscuit  city  yy 

lars  paid  the  cashier  of  the  Narragansett  Bank  to  our  use 
being  part  of  the  debt  due  to  sd  Bank  from  sd  Company." 
After  the  sale  to  Clarke  the  land  transfers  became  com- 
plicated and  the  lands  were  divided  into  small  holdings, 
causing  one  amusing  situation  wherein  Clarke  in  1820 
owned  the  door  yeard  of  the  old  house  still  occupied, 
apparently,  by  Jonathan  Babcock.  This  was  restored  to 
Babcock,  however,  in  1^24  by  formal  deed  duly  recorded. 
Clarke  operated  the  old  mill  not  for  textiles  but  for  the 
manufacture  of  carriages  and  wagons.  He  sold  out  to  Asa 
Potter  on  10  June  1  829,  having  previously  sold  some  of  the 
land  to  Elisha  Reynolds  Potter,  who  owned  the  land  sur- 
rounding the  "City."  Clarke  deeded  "lock,  stock  and 
barrel"  for  the  deed  lists  a  remarkable  number  of  car- 
nages and  wagons,  completed  and  unfinished,  together  with 
the  tools  and  gear  necessary  to  their  manufacture. 

On  1 1  November  1830  Asa  Potter  sold  the  Mill  prop- 
erty by  auction,  the  successful  bidders  being  Solomon  S. 
Harley  and  George  C.  Clarke.  Harley  operated  the  mill 
as  a  grist  mill  for  many  years  and  on  23  May  1866  the 
land,  "with  a  grist  mill — formerly  known  as  the  Narragan- 
sett Factory,"  having  come  to  John  Henry  Wells  and  his 
wife,  partly  by  inheritance,  partly  by  purchase  and  partly 
by  exchange,  was  conveyed  to  Judge  Elisha  Reynolds 
Potter,  great  grandson  of  Elisha  Reynolds,  who  had  pur- 
chased it  over  a  hundred  years  before.  It  remained  in  the 
Potter  family  until  recently  when  the  "Great  Spring"  was 
utilized  as  an  auxiliary  source  to  the  water  supply  for  the 
village  of  Kingston  and  the  lands  immediately  adjacent 
were  acquired  by  a  Company  formed  for  this  purpose. 

With  the  old  mill  and  the  Jonathan  Babcock  house  in 
ruins,  with  only  two  of  the  other  houses  standing  and  with 
the  "Great  Spring"  diverted  to  other  uses,  Biscuit  City  is 
now  but  a  name  and  a  memory. 


78  RHODE  ISLAND  H  ISTORICAL  SOCIETY 


New  Publications  of  Rhode  Island  Interest 

History  and  Genealogy  of  the  Ancestors  and  Some 
Descendants  of  Stukely  Westcott  by  Roscoe  L.  Whitman 
is  a  volume  of  435  pages,  published  by  the  Otsego  Pub.  Co., 
Oneonta,  N.  V. 

The  Bulletin  of  the  Newport  Historical  Society  for 
April  1933,  contains  the  translation  of  several  letters  and 
papers  relating  to  the  French  forces  in  Rhode  Island  during 
the  Revolution  and  also  an  account  of  P.  F.  Little,  the 
Little  Compton  printer. 

Negroes  on  the  Island  of  Rhode  Island  by  Charles  A. 
Battle  is  a  pamphlet  of  38  pages  published  at  Newport, 
in  1932. 

Obadiali  Holmes,  Ancestor  and  Prototype  of  Abraham 
Lincoln  by  Rev.  Wilbur  Nelson  is  a  pamphlet  of  20  pages 
printed  at  Newport,  in  1932. 

Letter  of  Instructions  to  the  Captain  and  the  Supercargo 
of  the  Brig  "Agenoria"  Engaged  in  a  Trading  Voyage  to 
Africa,  in  1  832  and  1  833,  with  other  papers  connected  with 
the  voyage,  is  a  pamphlet  of  46  pages  privately  printed  for 
Howard  Greene  of  Milwaukee,  and  Arnold  G.  Talbot  of 
Philadelphia.    The  Agenoria  was  a  Providence  vessel. 

The  Mariner  for  January  1933,  contains  the  articles  of 
agreement  for  the  building  of  a  ship  at  Warren,  R.  I., 
in  1747. 

The  Letters  of  Eleazar  IV  heel  or/As  Indians}  published 
by  Dartmouth  College,  contains  over  thirty  pages  of  letters 
written  by  Narragansett  Indians  from  1765  to  1778. 

Antiques  for  April  1933,  contains  an  illustrated  article 
by  Ruel  P.  Tolman  on  Other  Malhone  Miniatures. 

Historic  Newport  is  an  attractive  and  interesting  illus- 
trated booklet  recently  issued  by  the  Newport  Chamber  of 
Commerce. 


NEW  PUBLICATIONS  OF  R.  I.  INTEREST  79 

Volume  1  of  Richmond  Family  Records  by  Henry  I. 
Richmond,  M.A.,  Sc.B.,  of  Little  Compton,  R.  I.,  has  just 
been  published  by  Adlard  &  Son,  London.  It  is  a  volume  of 
232  pages  dealing  in  exhaustive  detail  with  the  Richmonds 
of  Maryland,  Virginia,  New  England,  Ireland,  and  Somer- 
set, England.  Mr.  Richmond  has  devoted  many  years  to 
research  relating  to  the  Richmond  family. 

The  May  1933  Bulletin  of  the  Business  Historical  So- 
ciety contains  some  letters  of  Samuel  Slater,  and  a  letter  to 
Moses  Lopez  of  Newport  in  regard  to  the  manufacture  of 
potash. 

Notes 

The  following  persons  have  been  elected  to  member- 
ship in  the  Society: 

Mrs!  A.  L.  Grant  Mrs.  George  E.  Downing 

Capt.  Ernest  H.  Brownell  Mrs.  Alden  L.  Littlefleld 

Mr.  Horace  M.  Peck 


A  Short  History  of  Jamestown 
By  W.  L.  Watson 

{Continued  front  page  59) 

In  the  records  of  the  Newport  Meeting  for  the  24th  of 
the  6th  month  1  788,  it  is  stated  that  the  money  raised  for 
building  a  new  meeting  house  was  not  sufficient  and  it  was 
voted  that  £7-1  1-5  pence  be  paid  out  of  the  general  treas- 
ury. It  is  thus  conclusive  that  the  new  meeting  house,  which 
is  the  one  now  standing,  was  built  in  1786  or  1787.  And  so 
we  have  the  records  of  the  building  which  is  now  standing 
and  which,  during  the  summer  months,  is  still  opened  for 
"Quaker  Meeting." 


80  RHODE  [SLAND  HISTORICAL  SOCIETY 

So  firmly  was  Quakerism  established  on  the  island  that, 
for  a  period  of  132  years  after  the  first  meeting  house  was 
built,  no  other  religious  sect  had  a  place  of  worship,  al- 
though Dr.  McSparron  made  frequent  visits  and  held 
services  of  the  Church  of  England  in  private  residences, 
particularly  those  of  Capt.  Paine,  Bro.  Arnold  and  Mr. 
Martin. 

After  holding  services  in  the  old  North  School  House 
for  some  time  the  first  Baptist  Society  built  their  meeting- 
house in  1  841  -2,  and  an  agreement  appears  on  their  records 
whereby  they  allowed  the  Seventh  Day  Baptists  to  use  it. 
This  little  meeting  house  still  stands  on  the  North  Road 
just  south  of  Carr's  Lane.  The  church  on  Narragansett 
Avenue,  which  is  now  used,  was  built  in  1891,  by  the 
Central  Baptist  Society. 

In  1836  there  was  only  "one  person  on  the  island  in 
communication  with  the  F,piscopal  Church."  In  1837  the 
parish  was  admitted  to  the  Fpiscopal  Union.  The  Rev. 
Edward  Way  land  was  the  first  minister.  In  1878  Rev.  Dr. 
Magill  of  Trinity  Church,  Newport,  took  it  as  a  mission 
and  in  1896  it  became  an  independent  congregation. 

In  1890  the  Roman  Catholic  Church  celebrated  its  first 
mass  at  the  Thorndyke  Hotel.  For  fourteen  years  the  parish 
was  continued  as  a  mission  of  St.  Mary's  Church,  Newport. 
In  1  900  it  was  established  as  a  permanent  parish. 

But  now  we  must  retrace  our  steps  somewhat.  In  sketch- 
ing the  various  activities  and  growth  of  the  town,  it  has 
undoubted]}"  been  noticed  that  every  one  of  them  suffered 
by  the  Revolutionary  War.  This  was  the  most  critical  as 
well  as  the  most  disastrous  period  in  the  town's  history. 

From  1730  to  just  before  the  war,  it  must  be  remem- 
bered, Newport  was  at  the  height  of  its  prosperity,  sur- 
passing New  York  as  a  commercial  center.  Over  200  vessels 
were  engaged  in  foreign  trade  and  over  400  coasting  vessels 
sailed  from  this  harbor  as  well  as  a  regular  line  of  packets 
to  London.  Thousands  of  seamen  thronged  the  docks, 
warehouses  were  overflowing,  there  were  1  7  manufacturers 


A  SHORT   HISTORY  OF  JAMESTOWN  81 

alone  of  sperm  oil  and  candles,  vast  fortunes  were  made  in 
the  slave  trade  and  the  distilling  of  rum,  and  ship  yards 
were  scattered  all  along  the  shores  of  the  bay.  Wealth  was 
abundant  and  prosperity  every  man's  portion.  Jamestown 
could  not  help  but  share  in  this  general  condition  and  was 
alert  to  better  her  condition,  as  is  shown  in  the  following 
vote  of  the  town  meeting  of  December  26,  1767. 

"It  is  voted  that  the  Hon.  Josiah  Arnold  Esq.  William  Hazard  Esq. 
Oliver  Hull  Esq.  Mr.  Daniel  Weeden,  Mr.  John  Weeden,  Capt.  John 
Eldred,  Capt  John  Gardner,  &  Mr.  John  Remington  or  the  major  part 
of  them,  be,  &  they  hereby  are  apointed  a  committee  to  consider  of  the 
most  Salutary  measures  to  be  Recommended  to  this  town,  for  incouraging 
Industry,  frugality,  &  the  Manufactures  of  this  colony,  as  well  to  Discour- 
age the  use  of  British  &  foreign  Manufactures  and  Superfluities  imported 
from  abroad;  &  that  they  make  Report  of  their  procedings  to  this  meeting 
which  stands  adjourned  to  the  third  Tuesday  of  January  next." 

Here  we  also  have  a  public  expression  of  dissatisfaction 
over  British  authority.  Jamestown  was  surrounded  by  ship- 
ping.- High  import  taxes,  particularly  on  molasses,  had 
made  smuggling  a  common  practice.  Encounters  between 
trading  vessels  and  British  excise  vessels  were  frequent. 
Respect  for  British  enforcement  of  law  was  at  a  low  ebb. 
Slowly  but  surely  the  undercurrents  of  resistance  were  con- 
verging into  a  mighty  stream. 

On  February  10,  1774,  the  records  read: 

"Considering  the  Greate  importance  in  Preserving  to  ourselves  &  Pos- 
terity our  Indubitable  &  Inherent  Rights  do  Vote  and  it  is  Voted  and 
Resolved  by  this  Meeting  that  for  preventing  any  tea  subject  to  a  duty 
sent  out  by  the  East  India  Company  being  Landed  in  this  town,  we  do 
Willingly  and  heartily  Join  in  the  s'd  Resolves  Containing  N.N.  nine,  and 
to  the  utmost  of  our  power  will  stand  by  and  Support  our  Brethren  in  this 
and  the  sister  Colony's  in  all  such  Just  and  Laudable  Measures  as  may 
preserve  to  us  our  Just  Rights  and  priveledges  as  Englishmen." 

Then  on  October  16,  1775,  it  was  voted: 

"That  a  Watch  be  set  and  kept  in  this  town  till  further  Orders  fron 
the  town  from  Six  O'Clock  in  the  evening  till  Sun  rise  the  Next  morning 
that  the  watch  be  set  and  kept  from  Eldreds  Northward  Round  the  Point 
&  if  necessarv  to  keep  also  a  strict  On  the  Western  Shore  from  the  Point 
as  far  down  as  Opposite  s'd  Eldgedges  Shore." 


82  RHODE  ISLAM)  HISTORICAL  SOCIETY 

Then  again,  fearing  serious  disaster,  it  was  voted  on 
October  21,  1775,  "that  the  Records  of  this  town  be  kept 
in  North  Kingstown  where  they  now  are  or  in  some  Other 
Secure  place  as  the  Town  Clerk  or  Council  Clerk  Shall 
Think  Proper,  untill  further  Order  from  the  town." 

Narragansett  Bay,  with  its  large  amount  of  shipping,  had 
always  been  a  focal  point  for  the  British  Revenue  ships. 
In  1769  the  armed  sloop  Liberty  was  sent  to  Newport 
from  Boston,  to  enforce  the  revenue  laws.  She  seized  a 
Connecticut  brig  and  a  sloop  and  brought  them  into  New- 
port. The  indignant  citizens  managed,  by  a  subterfuge,  to 
get  all  the  Liberty's  men  ashore  and  then  someone  went 
out  and  cut  her  cable.  She  drifted  ashore  and  was  later 
struck  by  lightning  and  consumed  by  fire.  In  1772  the 
Gaspee  was  destroyed.  These  revenue  vessels  were  a  fa- 
miliar sight  from  Jamestown  and  were  the  reason  for 
establishing  the  night  patrol.  The  men  of  the  patrol  did 
not  always  use  discretion  and  occasionally  took  pot  shots  at 
these  vessels.  So,  also,  did  Capt.  John  Eldred.  The  story- 
is  told  by  Field  in  "Revolutionerv  Defences  of  Rhode 
Island." 

"During  the  Revolution,  there  lived,  on  the  Eldred  Farm,  on  the  east 
side  of  Conanicut,  Captain  John  Eldred,  a  patriot  of  the  purest  type.  On 
his  land  there  were  two  great  rocks  overlooking  the  water  from  a  com- 
manding position.  Here  Captain  Eldred  planted  one  of  the  guns  taken 
from  the  fort  on  the  island  (the  battery  where  Fort  Dumpling  later  stood) . 
From  time  to  time,  the  patriotic  old  farmer  would  amuse  himself  by  firing 
a  shot  at  the  British  vessels  as  they  passed  up  and  down  the  East  Passage. 
One  day,  he  was  fortunate  enough  to  put  a  shot  through  the  mainsail  of 
one  of  the  enemy's  ships.  This  little  pleasantry  on  the  part  of  Farmer 
Eldred  was  not  relished  by  the  Britisher.  A  boat  was  lowered  and  a  force 
sent  ashore  to  dislodge  the  company,  which,  it  was  supposed,  occupied  the 
station,  and  spike  the  gun.  Upon  seeing  the  boat  lowered,  Mr.  Eldred 
quicklv  hid  himself  in  the  swamp  at  the  far  end  of  his  farm,  and  when  the 
boat's  party  arrived  on  the  spot,  nothing  was  found  but  the  gun  mounted 
between  the  rocks.  This  they  spiked,  and  the  company  they  expected  to 
capture  had  vanished  as  completely  as  though  swallowed  up  In  the  earth. 
This  was  Eldred's  one  gun  battery." 


A  SHORT  HISTORY  OF  JAMESTOWN  83 

(The  Jamestown  Chapter  of  the  D.  A.  R.  is  named  the 
"John  Eldred  Chapter,"  and  a  few  years  ago  placed  a 
tablet  on  one  of  the  rocks. ) 

Whether  it  was  because  of  this  or  out  of  pure  wanton- 
ness, on  December  1 1,  1775,  the  British  landed  200  men 
on  the  island  and  proceeded  to  destroy  the  village.  The 
account  is  given  in  the  diary  of  Ezra  Stiles,  a  minister  of 
Newport. 

"Dec.  10,  1775.  This  morning  we  were  awakened  with  the  conflagra- 
tion of  Jamestown  on  Conanicut.  An  awful  sight!  .  The  bomb  brigg  and 
several  Tenders  full  of  marines  went  over  last  night,  and  about  v  o'clock 
or  a  little  before  day  landed  and  set  fire  to  the  Houses.  The  men  continued 
ravaging  and  burning  'till  about  Noon  and  returned. 

"Dec.  11,  1775.  About  1  o'clock  vesterday  morning  a  Bomb  Brig, 
1  schooner,  &  2  or  3  armed  sloops  went  to  Conanicott  &  landed  upward  of 
Two  hundred  Marines  Sailors  &Negroes  at  the  E.  Ferrv  and  marched  in 
three  divisions  over  to  the  W.  Ferry,  &  set  the  several  houses  on  fire  there, 
then  retreated  back  sett  fire  to  almost  every  house  on  each  side  of  the  road, 
&  several  Houses  and  Barns  some  distance  on  the  N.  &  S.  side  of  the  Rode, 
driving  out  Women  &  Children  etc. 

Houses  Burnt  &  Lost 
Widow  Hull 1  house 

Jos.  Clarke,  Esq. 2  houses  &  1  Barn 

Thos.  Fowler 1  house&  1  Crib 

Ben.  Ellery 2houses  &  1  Store 

Benj.  Remington 2  houses 

Jno.  Gardiner --2  houses  &  1  Tanvard 

Gov.  Hutchinson 1  house 

Wm.  Franklin 2  houses 

Abel  Franklin 1  house 

Bend.  Robinson 1  house 


1  5  Dwellings 

A  Company  of  Minute  Men  had  left  Conanicut  the  Aft.  before  so 
that  there  were  but  40  or  50  soldiers  on  the  Island,  of  which  22  were  well 
equipped.  At  the  Cross  Rodes  there  was  a  Skirmish  our  pple  killed  one 
Officer  of  Marines  and  wounded  7  or  8.  Not  one  Colonist  was  killed  or 
hurt  in  the  Skirmish.  The  Kings  forces  fired  on  Mr.  Jno.  Martin  aet  80 
standing  at  his  Door  and  wounded  him  Badly.  Mr.  Fowler  had  about  30 
Head  Cattle:  these  the  Regulars  carried  off  and  perhaps  a  dozen  Head 
more,  about  30  Sheep  &  as  many  Turkevs,  &  some  Hogs,  Beds,  Furniture 


84  RHODE  ISLAND  HISTORICAL  SOCIETY 

and  other  plunder.  They  returned  on  hoard  at  X  or  XI  o'clock  &  came  to 
this  Harbor  aboul  Noon. 

'The  Alarm  spread,&  1  an  told  there  are  this  day  Three  hundred  Men 
on  Conanicutt  l\  Eight  hundred  upon  the  Island.  The  Town  in  great 
Consternation. 

An  account  also  appeared  in  the  Providence  Gazette, 
December  16,  1775,  under  the  heading  "The  Burning  of 
Jamestown,"  as  follows: 

"Sunday  morning  last,  the  bomb  brig,  a  schooner,  and  two  or  three 
armed  sloops  left  the  harbor  of  Newport  and  landed  about  two  hundred 
marines,  sailors  and  Negroes  on  the  Ferry  on  the  east  side  of  Conanicut, 
from  whence  they  immediately  marched  across  in  three  divisions  to  the 
West  Ferrv,  and  after  burning  all  the  houses  near  the  Ferry-Place,  re- 
turned towards  their  vessels,  setting  tire  to  almost  every  house  on  each 
side  of  the  road,  from  the  West  to  the  Fast  Ferry,  and  several  houses  and 
hams  some  distance  on  the  North  and  South  side  of  the  road,  driving  out 
the  women  and  children,  swearing  they  should  be  burnt  in  the  houses,  if 
they  did  not  instantly  turn  out.  Captain  Wallace  commanded.  Mr.  John 
Martin,  standing  unarmed  in  his  own  door,  was  shot.  Fifty  cows  and  six 
oxen,  a  few  sheep  and  hogs  were  taken.  All  were  plundered  of  beds,  wear- 
ing apparel  and  household  furniture.  They  left  Conanicut  the  same  morn- 
ing and  got  back  to  Newport  at  Noon." 

Every  house  in  the  village  was  destroyed.  They  confined 
themselves  to  the  village,  however,  so  the  farm  houses  at 
the  north  were  saved.  General  Washington,  in  a  letter 
written  at  Cambridge,  speaks  of  "the  barbarity  of  Capt. 
Wallace  on  Conanicut  Island." 

In  the  spring  of  1  776  Capt.  Wallace  and  his  fleet  with- 
drew from  the  bay.  But  for  only  a  short  period  was  this 
territory  to  be  unmolested.  On  December  7,  1776,  Job 
Watson,  from  his  watch  tower  on  Tower  Hill,  saw  a  large 
squadron  of  war  vessels  coming  toward  the  entrance  of 
Narragansett  Bay.  They  sailed  up  the  west  passage,  around 
the  north  end  of  the  island  and  anchored  along  the  shores 
of  the  Island  of  Rhode  Island,  from  Portsmouth  to  New- 
port Harbor.  Eight  to  ten  thousand  British  and  Hessian 
troops  landed  and  took  possession  of  Newport,  and,  once 
again,  this  little  colony  on  Jamestown  was  in  a  desperate 


A  SHORT   HISTORY  OF  JAMESTOWN  85 

plight.  Out  of  a  population  of  over  600  in  1 774,  but  a  little 
over  three  hundred  remained. 

But  now  there  was  a  demand  for  men  for  the  army.  On 
September  24,  1776,  two  men  were  sent  from  the  island. 
On  November  21,  1776,  the  General  Assembly  made  a 
levy  of  6  men  out  of  every  100  male  inhabitants.  The 
following  entry  in  the  town  records,  December  3,  1776, 
gives  a  vivid  picture  of  their  condition: 

"This  Meeting  being  Conven'd  in  Obedience  to  an  Act  of  the  Genera] 
Assembly  held  at  East  Greenwich  21  of  Nov.  1776,  for  Raising  Six  men 
out  of  every  Hundred  of  the  Male  Inhabitants  as  last  Estimated  in  this 
town  to  be  sent  to  the  Island  of  Rhode  Island  in  ten  days  after  the  Rising 
of  s'd  Assembly  to  assist  in  Defending  the  s'd  Island  against  the  Minis- 
terial fleets  and  armies  now  at  war  against  the  free  and  Independent  States 
of  America.  This  town  Meeting  as  freemen  being  Met  &  Considering 
their  Depopulated  Distressed  and  Defenceless  condition  toward  the  Rais- 
ing Equiping  and  sending  forward  s'd  men  agreeable  to  said  act  do  at  this 
time  Most  sensebly  regret  and  find  that  'tis  out  of  the  power  of  the  town 
to  Raise  the  Men  Required  by  s'd  Act  but  at  the  same  time  are  Willing  & 
Desirous  to  be  aiding  &  assisting  in  the  Defence  of  Rhode  Island,  for  that 
Purpose  will  endeavour  to  Inlist  the  six  men  Required  of  this  town  by  s'd 
act  equip  &  send  then  forward  for  the  Common  Defence  Speedily  as  mav 
be  agreeable  to  said  act.  but  if  the  town  in  their  Now  most  Calammitous 
&  Distressed  Situation  find  it  out  of  their  power  to  raise  s'd  men  they 
humbly  hope  the  fine  for  not  Raising  Equiping  &  sending  them  forward 
agreeable  to  s'd  act  may  not  be  Exacted  on  the  Inhabitants  of  the  town." 

As  soon  as  the  British  started  to  plan  their  intrenchments 
in  and  around  Newport,  it  was  seen  it  would  be  necessary  to 
occupy  Conanicut  so  that  adequate  protection  might  be 
obtained  on  the  west.  The  American  forces  could  assemble 
in  Narragansett  on  the  main  land  and  cross  over  to  Conani- 
cut unmolested.  From  there  they  would  command  the  east 
as  well  as  the  west  passage  to  Narragansett  Bay  and  it  would 
be  but  a  short  distance  to  Newport.  To  prevent  this  possibil- 
ity the  54th  British  Regiment  was  detailed  to  occupy  the 
redoubt  on  the  west  side  of  the  island  (Fox  Hill)  about 
two  miles  north  of  the  light-house  (Beaver  Tail),  which 
they  noted  upon  entering  the  bay,  had  been  abandoned  by 
the  Americans.  War  vessels  were  anchored  along  the  west 


86  RHODE  ISLAM)  HISTORICAL  SOCIETY 

coast  of  the  island  and  also  between  Conanicut  and  Prudence 
Island. 

As  a  further  protection  a  redoubt  was  erected  north  east 
of  the  narrow  beach  between  Mackerel  Cove  and  Sheffield's 
Pond.  At  this  redoubt  barracks  to  accommodate  50  men  and 
officers  were  built.  Still  another  redoubt  or  fort  was  erected 
later  at  the  Dumplings  which  commanded  the  east  passage. 
These  fortifications  were  fully  equipped  with  cannon,  and  a 
detachment  of  troops,  frequently  Hessians,  were  stationed 
there.  At  one  time  two  battalions  were  stationed  on  the 
south  end  of  the  island  at  Beaver  Tail,  but  no  evidence  has 
been  found  that  any  fortifications  were  ever  erected  there. 

On  December  9,  1  777,  a  detachment  of  50  men  was  sta- 
tioned on  the  island  to  cut  wood  for  the  troops  in  Newport. 
A  transport  was  anchored  near  the  ferry.  Here  the  troops 
slept  and  when  landing  in  the  morning  they  were  ordered 
to  take  their  arms  with  them.  This  work  continued  until 
every  tree  available  for  fire  wood  had  been  cut  down. 

In  July,  1778,  word  was  received  that  the  French  fleet 
had  set  out  for  Newport  to  join  the  American  forces  in  an 
attack  on  the  British  Army  entrenched  at  Newport.  All  the 
fortifications  on  Conanicut  were  strengthened  and  more 
men  stationed  there.  On  July  29th,  the  French  fleet  ap- 
peared off  the  entrance  to  the  bay.  Had  they  immediately 
landed  forces  on  Conanicut  they  could  have  captured  the 
entire  British  force  stationed  there,  but  instead,  they  re- 
mained at  anchor  off  Beaver  Tail  for  several  days.  In  the 
meantime  the  British  withdrew  their  troops  and  the  evacua- 
tion was  so  precipitate  that  they  spiked  the  cannon  at  Fox 
Hill  and  those  at  the  Dumplings,  two  24  pounders,  were 
thrown  down  the  rocks  into  the  sea. 

The  delay  of  the  French  was  fatal.  While  they  were 
still  anchored  off  shore  word  was  received  that  a  British 
fleet  had  sailed  from  New  York.  They  soon  appeared  and 
the  French  fleet  immediately  set  all  sail  after  them.  Both 
fleets  quickly  passed  out  of  sight  beyond  the  horizon.  A 
severe  storm  arose  and  the  vessels  became  separated,  all 


A  SHORT  HISTORY  OF  JAMESTOWN  87 

being  badly  damaged  by  the  wind  and  waves.  No  decisive 
encounter  occurred,  and  after  several  days  a  badly  crippled 
French  fleet  appeared  in  the  harbor,  but  they  soon  set  sail 
for  Boston  to  repair  the  damage  done  by  the  storm.  In  the 
meantime  the  attack  on  Newport  from  the  north  by  the 
Americans  failed  and  the  British  again  were  in  unchal- 
lenged possession  of  the  town.  Troops  were  again  stationed 
at  the  fortifications  on  Conanicut. 

To  give  a  comprehensive  account  of  the  part  Jamestown 
took  in  this  period  it  would  be  necessary  to  follow  the  move- 
ments of  the  American  British  and  French  forces.  This 
space  forbids,  but  the  foregoing  gives  an  idea  of  the  strate- 
gic position  of  the  island. 

After  having  occupied  the  island  for  four  years  the  Brit- 
ish departed  in  1779.  The  following  winter  was  the  most 
severe  ever  experienced.  So  impoverished  were  the  inhabi- 
tants, they  were  compelled  to  call  for  outside  assistance. 

In  July  of  the  following  year  the  French  fleet,  under 
Admiral  de  Ternay  came  to  Newport.  The  poverty- 
stricken  people  did  their  best  to  make  their  stay  pleasant, 
but  even  with  them  there  was  source  of  complaint,  as  is 
shown  in  the  following  entry  in  the  town  records  for 
August  19,  1780: 

"It  is  Voted  that  Messrs.  Benjamin  Underwood,  John  Gardner,  John 
Weeden,  Benjamin  Remington,  George  Tew,  &  John  Howland  be  a 
committee  and  Prepare  an  Address  to  their  Excellencies  the  Count  de 
Rochambeau  and  the  Chavilier  de  Ternev  commander  of  his  most  Chris- 
tian majesties  fleet  in  the  harbour  of  Newport.  Praying  that  the  people 
under  his  command  might  not  be  Permitted  to  come  on  shore  without 
some  Good  and  Known  officer  over  them  in  order  to  Restrain  them  from 
Committing  Damage  or  offering  any  injury  or  insult  to  the  Good  and 
Peaceable  People  of  this  town." 

And  on  June  29,  1  78 1 ,  it  was  necessary  to  make  another 
complaint  as  follows: 

Jamestown   at   a   town    Meeting   called   and   held    in    the   said    town. 

June  29,  A.  D.  1781 
"Whereas  it  is  represented  to  this  meeting  that  the  Sailors  belonging  to 
his  most  Christian  Majesties  fleet  in  the  harbor  of  Newport,  and  those  in 


88  RHODE  ISLAM)  HISTORICAL  SOCIETY 

the  hospitals  in  this  town,  frequently  pass  through  the  Meadows  and  fields 
of  Grain  in  the  daytime,  &  in  the  Night  Season  are  Patroling  the  town 
throwing  their  fences  &  Walls  down  by  which  some  of  the  Inhabitants  has 
received  Greate  Damage  &  more  is  likely  to  insue  if  not  speedily 
prevented. 

It  is  Therefore  Voted  that  Benjamin  Underwood  ix  John  Weeden  be 
appointed  to  prepare  a  Remonstrance  petition  or  address  to  the  Admiral 
&  General  of  the  french  Troop  in  the  Land  and  Sea  Service  in  behalf  of 
the  town  Praving  that  their  Troops  may  be  Restrained  and  Prevented 
from  passing  through  the  lands  and  fields  of  Grain,  throwing  their  Walls 
and  fences  down  or  Doing  Damage  to  the  Good  and  Wholesome  People 
of  the  town:  and  that  Aaron  Sheffield  be  desired  to  Present  the  address  to 
the  Admiral  and  General  of  the  French  Army  and  Navy." 

After  seven  years  of  conflict  the  war  was  drawing  to  a 
close.  The  French  forces  were  to  leave  Newport  and 
co-operate  with  Lafayette  in  the  south.  General  Washing- 
ton desired  to  confer  with  the  French  Admiral  and  also  to 
witness  the  departure.  He  left  his  camp  near  New  York 
City,  came  up  the  old  Indian  trail  through  Connecticut  to 
South  Ferry  where  he  took  the  old  sailboat  ferry  to  James- 
town, landing  on  the  west  shore  of  the  island  at  about  the 
same  place  as  the  ferry  now  lands,  in  the  early  afternoon  of 
March  sixth.  Crossing  the  island  he  was  met  by  the  French 
officers  at  the  East  Ferry,  where  the  admiral's  barge  was 
awaiting  to  convey  him  to  the  French  war  vessel  "Due  de 
Bourgoyne,"  where  he  was  received  by  Count  Rochambeau. 

In  commemoration  of  this  visit  of  our  greatest  citizen, 
the  local  chapter  of  the  I).  A.  R.,  during  the  Washington 
Celebration  last  summer,  placed  a  marker  on  the  road, 
which  will  be  a  reminder  to  all  those  now  driving  from 
ferry  to  ferry  that  they  are  traveling  the  same  road  that 
General  Washington  took  when  he  crossed  the  island. 

On  October  19,  1781,  Cornwallis  surrendered  at  York- 
town,  and  the  war  was  over.  During  these  years  of  conflict 
there  was  a  common  purpose  which  bound  the  people 
together,  and  there  were  few  indeed  who,  either  directly  or 
indirectly,  had  not  taken  a  part  in  this  struggle.  But  now 
each  person,  each  family,  each  community  began  to  think 
of  their  own  condition.  The  spirit  of  nationalism  disap- 


A  SHORT   HISTORY  OF  JAMESTOWN  89 

peared  with  the  British  armies.  The  immediate  struggle  for 
a  livelihood  was  the  great  concern  of  all.  There  were  the 
few  years  of  prosperous  activity  which  always  follow  a 
great  war,  but  these  were  followed  by  a  great  financial 
panic.  Taxes  were  exorbitant  and  general  conditions  so  bad 
that  thousands  of  farmers  deserted  their  farms  to  start  over 
again  in  a  new  locality.  The  great  movement  to  "go  west" 
had  started.  * 

But  no  matter  what  the  conditions  were  throughout  the 
country,  Jamestown  could  have  been  no  worse  off  than  it 
was,  for  Jamestown  was  not  only  ruined,  it  was  practically 
depopulated.  Those  who  remained  were  farmers  and  their 
only  hope  for  a  living  was  to  get  it  out  of  the  ground.  This 
they  resolutely  set  out  to  do.  Sheep  provided  meat  and 
wool,  spinning  wheels  were  always  humming  making  yarn, 
the  hand  looms  wove  blankets  and  the  cloth  which  was  cut 
up  and  made  into  clothes.  They  also  grew  flax  and  wove 
their  own  linens.  Pigs  provided  hams,  which  were  smoked 
with  corn-cobs  and  cured  by  hand,  sausage,  lard  and  mince 
pies  j  apples  were  cut  up  and  dried  and  also  made  into  cider ; 
geese  provided  meat  and  feathers  for  feather  beds.  The 
milk  house  of  an  average  farm  in  early  winter  would  reveal 
a  side  or  two  of  beef  and  mutton,  many  bags  of  sausage, 
tubs  of  butter  and  lard,  bags  of  dried  apples  and  a  hundred 
or  more  mince  pies  which,  with  the  potatoes,  turnips,  car- 
rots, cabbages  and  the  barrel  of  cider  in  the  cellar,  had  to 
carry  them  through  the  winter.  All  the  cooking  was  done  in 
an  open  fireplace  or  the  brick  oven,  and  sweeping  was  done 
with  turkey  wings.  The  men  spent  their  days  cultivating 
the  fields,  raising  and  harvesting  the  crops,  tending  the 
cattle  and  chopping  wood.  The  women  prepared  the  meals, 
tended  the  house,  wove  cloth,  knitted  stockings,  made 
clothes  and  found  time  to  make  samplers  and  do  embroid- 
ery. The  evenings  were  illuminated  by  candles  dipped  or 
moulded  of  mutton  fat. 

The  farm  seemed  to  provide  everything  except  boots  and 
shoes.  The  itinerant  shoe  maker  made  his  yearly  visits  and 


90  RHODE  ISLAM)  HISTORICAL  SOCIETY 

stayed  at  the  house  while  making  the  shoes.  The  following 
bill  covering  one  such  visit  is  worthy  of  preservation: 

To  making  your  boots  $2.00 

To  soling  Mary  .34 

To  making  your  youngest  .29 

To  mending  black  girl  .  1 6 

To  mending  your  son  .2  1 

To  mending  your  wife  .06 

Such  was  the  life  on  the  average  Jamestown  farm  for 
four  generations  after  the  Revolutionary  War.  The  only 
market  for  farm  produce  was  Newport,  so  as  Newport 
prospered,  Jamestown  had  a  little  more  real  money  with 
which  to  buy  things. 

The  next  activity  came  with  the  Civil  War.  At  this  time 
the  3rd  Rhode  Island  Cavalry  was  encamped  on  the  island 
and  barracks  were  built.  After  the  war  these  were  sold,  and 
A.  Crawford  Greene,  of  Providence,  purchased  one  which 
he  used  for  a  summer  residence.  In  this  humble  way  did 
Jamestown  start  as  a  summer  resort.  Gradually  others 
came.  Among  the  first  from  afar  were  several  Quaker  fam- 
ilies from  Philadelphia.  Today,  aside  from  a  few  farms  at 
the  north  and  south  ends  of  the  island,  Jamestown  is  a 
summer  resort.  There  are  several  hotels  which  provide  for 
those  who  prefer  hotel  life;  cottages,  large  or  small,  can  be 
rented  for  the  season;  and  there  are  many  beautiful  resi- 
dences which  have  been  built  by  those  who  are  permanent 
summer  residents. 

In  the  main  the  history  of  Jamestown  follows  the  history 
of  New  England,  but  it  is  the  little  things  in  life  that  make 
for  individuality,  and  so  we  find  the  intimate  history  of 
Jamestown  possessing  an  allurement  all  of  its  own. 

(In  printing  this  article,  I  wish  to  express  my  indebtedness  to  Miss 
Lena  Clarke,  of  famestown,  for  her  untiring  efforts  in  searching  and 
copying  the  original  records.) 


THE   KING  TOM    HOUSE 

Courtesy  of  Mr.  J.  H.  Richardson 

When  the  Society  of  the  Colonial  Dames  published 
Old  Houses  in  the  South  County  of  Rhode  Island, 
no  photograph  of  the  King  Tom  house  was  located. 
Since  then  Mr.  Richardson  has  kindly  contributed  the 
photograph  which  is  printed  above. 


92  RHODE  ISLAND  HISTORICAL  SOCIETY 

Genealogical  Notes 

By  Edward  H.  West 
{Continued  from  page  6)  ) 

WILLIAM    POTTER 

Since  my  discovery  of  Ann  (Talman)  Brayton's  mar- 
riage to  William  Potter,  I  have  been  searching  out  facts 
about  William  Potter  and  find  that  the  Durfee  book  and 
Austin  are  both  wrong,  as  there  was  but  one  William 
Potter. 

Austin  gives  two  William  Potters,  one  the  husband  of 

Talman,  the  other  the  husband  of  Ann  Durfee.  He 

presumes  that  Ann  Potter  was  the  daughter  of  Thomas 
Durfee,  as  he  left  her  a  legacy. 

In  the  will  of  Thomas  Durfee,  he  calls  his  children  either 
son  or  daughter,  but  does  not  call  Ann  Potter  daughter. 
One  must  not  forget  that  Thomas  Durfee  and  Ann  Talman, 
the  mother  of  Ann  Durfee,  were  at  least  very  great  friends, 
so  he  probably  remembered  Ann  Potter  as  a  favorite  of  his. 

Austin  also  says  that  William  and  Ann  (  Durfee  )  Potter 
sold  land  in  1697  to  William  Burrington  and  in  1720  he 
deeded  to  William  Potter,  Jr.,  all  his  land  in  Portsmouth. 

Let  us  see  what  the  Land  Evidence  Book  really  says. 

The  first  deed  will  not  tell  us  anything  as  it  was  some 
land  that  was  granted  to  William  Potter  in  1694.  In 
March  1703-4  William  and  Ann  Potter  mortgaged  to 
Isaac  Lawton  the  land  that  had  belonged  to  Stephen  Bray- 
ton,  dec,  the  first  husband  of  Ann  Talman.  In  1713-4 
William  and  Ann  Potter  quitclaimed  to  their  son  and  son- 
in-law,  Stephen  Brayton,  the  above  mentioned  land. 

In  1707,  Preserved  Brayton  sold  to  William  Potter  the 
land  that  had  been  granted  to  Ann  Potter,  his  mother,  for 
him,  then  a  minor,  in  1694.  This  was  the  12  acres  that 
William  Potter  sold  to  William  Potter,  fr.,  in  1  720. 


GENEALOGICAL  NOTES  93 

In  1721,  William  Potter,  mariner,  and  wife,  Prudence 
Potter,  mortgaged  this  same  12  acres  to  the  Colony.  In 
1727,  William  Potter,  mariner,  and  wife,  Prudence,  sold 
this  same  land  to  William  Earl. 

In  the  original  vital  records,  not  the  printed  ones,  is 
^written:  "Nathaniel  Potter  ( the  son  of  William  Potter  and 
Ann  his  wife )  was  married  to  Ruth  Manchester  ( the 
daughter  of  Stephen  Manchester  and  Elizabeth  his  wife) 
by  William  Coggeshall  Ass't.     1712." 

"The  births  of  the  children  of  the  above  said  Nathaniel 
Potter  and  Ruth  his  wife: — Elizabeth  Potter  born  2  May 
1 713  j  Ruth  Potter  born  1 4  October  1715." 

"William  Potter  ( son  of  the  above  said  William  Potter 
and  Ann  his  wife  )  was  born  1  1  March  1 696." 

The  Durfee  Book  mentions  the  wills  of  John  Fish  and 
his  wife  Joanna,  recorded  in  1 742  and  1  744,  in  which  men- 
tion is  made  of  their  daughter,  Mary,  the  wife  of  William 
Potter.  These  wills  are  not  recorded  in  Portsmouth. 

The  marriage  of  William  Potter  and  Prudence is 

not  recorded  either.  As  he  was  a  mariner,  he  may  have 
married  her  in  some  port  at  which  he  touched  and  brought 
her  to  Portsmouth. 

Who  the  Prudence  Potter  was  that  married  John 
Williams  of  Stonington,  Conn.,  (Original  Record)  I  have 
not  yet  been  able  to  discover. 

An  Unrecorded  Marriage. 

"William  Hall  &  Benjamin  Hall  of  Portsmouth 

Testifyeth that  at  or  about  the  20th  Day  of  August 

1748,  they were  Present  at  the  house  of  the  sd 

William  Hall  at  Portsmouth,  when  Benjamin  Turner,  then 
a  Resident  of  Newport  and  a  native  of  Great  Britain,  was 
married unto  Rebecca  Tallman  of  Tiverton  by  Ben- 
jamin Tucker  Esq.  then  an  Assistant . 

The  above  Deposition  was  Sworn  too  before  me  this  5 
Day  of  August  1  783."  John  Thurston,  J.P. 

(Town  Council  Records,  VII  -  55.) 


(>4  RHODE  ISLAM)  HISTORICAL  SOCIETY 


The  Minutes  of  the  Westconnaug  Purchase 

Transcribed  by  Theodore  G.  Foster 
{Continued  from  fage  36) 

At  a  Meeting  of  the  Committee  and  Proprietors  at  War- 
wick July  1 4th  1715  Whereas  Thomas  Field  was  admitted 
a  Share  in  Westquanaug  at  a  Proprietors  Meeting  at 
Kingston  the  20th  of  February  1706/7  but  he  not  then 
accepting  the  said  Admittance  and  not  paying  his  proportion 
of  the  Charge  that  hath  accrued  We  declare  the  said  Grant 
to  be  void  .  .  .  Notwithstanding  for  some  particular  Serv- 
ice he  hath  done  the  Proprietors  We  do  now  grant  him  half 
a  Lot  joining  upon  N"  4  he  paying  his  proportionable  part 
of  the  Charge  that  hath  accrued  ...  It  is  agreed  forth- 
with to  draw  Lots  for  the  First  Division  from  N"  1.  to  29 
according  to  the  Plat  laid  before  us  by  Josiah  Westcoat 
Surveyor  and  the  Lot  that  any  Person  shall  draw  the  Divi- 
sion on  the  Plat  being  of  the  same  Number  with  his  said  Lot 
shall  be  his  Right  and  Property  to  improve  as  his  Real 

Estate  to  him  and  his  Heirs  forever — 

And  it  is  further  Ordered  that  Such  Person  as  shall 
draw  any  of  the  Numbers  1  to  8  shall  have  their  first  choice 
of  the  next  Division  of  Lands  in  Westquanaug  the  Lot  N" 
12  to  be  included:  Zachariah  Rhodes  Lot  N"  29  is  allowed 
him  as  his  Fathers  share  without  drawing  his  Lot  all  the 
Rest  of  the  Lands  not  now  called  for  shall  be  further 
Divided  among  the  Proprietors  ....  ordered  by  their 
Trustees 

At  a  Meeting  of  the  Committee  &  Proprietors  of  West 
quanaug  at  Warwick  at  the  House  of  Mary  Carder  July 
the  14th  1715 

Ordered  that  the  Proprietors  come  to  a  New  Choice 
of  a  Committee  and  Clerk  and  Treasurer  who  are  Chosen 
as  followeth 
/Viz/ 


THE  WESTCONNAUG  PURCHASE  95 

COL  SAMUEL  CRANSTON 

Major  James  Brown 
Capt  Benjamin  Ellery 

Job  Greene  Committee 

Mayor  Joseph  Whipple 
Mr  Richard  Waterman 
Major  Thomas  Fenner 
Job  Greene  Clerk  and  engaged 

Major  Thomas  Fenner  Treasurer 
Voted  that  the  committee  shall  have  full  Power  to  make 
choice  of  a  Surveyor  to  lay  out  the  Remaining  part  of  the 
Purchase  of  Westquanauge  and  to  proceed  in  that  Affair  as 
soon  as  may  be  with  convenience  and  to  act  and  do  any  other 
Business  that  they  shall  think  needful  for  the  Proprietors 
Interest  in  the  said  Purchase 

Voted  That  each  whole  Share  Man  shall  pay  unto  Major 
Thomas  Fenner  Treasurer  Twenty  Shillings  apiece  forth- 
with towards  paying  the  Charge  of  Surveying  and  other 
incident  Charges  that  may  arise  about  the  Premises  and 
each  Man  claiming  a  Smaller  Share  shall  pay  a  proportion- 
able Part  accordingly 

Whereas  Thomas  Weaver  of  Newport  has  sold  half  a 
Share  of  Westquanaug  without  acquainting  the  Proprietors 
or  Trustees  thereof  and  neglecting  to  pay  his  Proportion  of 
the  incidental  Charges  he  is  directed  to  pay  his  Proportion 
into  the  Hands  of  some  one  of  the  Trustees  before  the  next 
Meeting  and  then  make  his  Acknowledgment  and  show 
good  Reason  for  his  Breach  of  Covenant  or  else  his  Half 
Share  so  Sold  is  to  be  forfeited  to  the  Proprietors. 

Signed  per  order       Job  Greene     Clerk1"'" 


At  a  Meeting  of  the  committee  of  Westquanauge  at  the 
House  of  Mrs.  Mary  Carder  in  Warwick  October  29th 
1717 

Ordered  That  Mr  Resolved  Waterman  is  chosen  a 
committee  Man  in  the  Room  and  Place  of  Mr  Joseph 


96  RHODE  ISLAND  HISTORICAL  SOCIETY 

Whipple  he  having  sold  all  his  Interest  in  said  Purchase 
and  Waterman  having  bought  a  Share  in  said  Purchase 


Providence  May  28.  1718  Ordered  that  Capt  Richard 
Waterman  shall  be  Treasurer  in  the  Room  of  Major 
Thomas  Fenner  Deceased  and  that  he  demand  and  receive 
the  Treasurer  Money  into  his  Hand  of  the  Executor  for  the 

Use  of  the  Proprietors 

Ordered  That  Capt  Thomas  Harris  shall  be  a  com- 
mittee Man  in  the  Place  and  Room  of  Major  Fenner  De- 
ceased he  having  purchased  Land  in  said  Purchase 


At  a  Meeting  of  the   Committee  of  Westquanaug  at 
Providence  May  the  28th  1718. 

Having  received  a  Return  of  the  Running  and  Re- 
vising of  the  Lines  between  Between  Providence  and  West- 
quanaug and  the  Colony  Line  and  Warwick  Line  by  the 
Persons  appointed  for  that  Purpose  they  having  made 
many  Remarks  in  said  Lines  |  illegible]  in  order  for  a  fur- 
ther Division  whereupon  it  is  jointly  agreed  on  by  the  com- 
mittee of  the  Main  Land  that  there  be  a  Second  Division  of 
one  Hundred  and  Fifty  Acres  at  the  least  to  |  illegible  \ 
whole  share  Man  and  Addition  where  the  Land  is  mean  to 
make  them  equal  with  the  best  Land The  Second  Divi- 
sion to  be  laid  out  to  the  Eastward  of  the  colony  Line  and 
it  is  ordered  that  Major  Job  Greene  Capt  Thomas  Harris 
and  Ensign  Resolved  Waterman  shall  be  overseers  to  see 
the  Work  done  and  to  agree  with  Josiah  Westcoat  Sur- 
veyor to  be  the  principal  Surveyor  in  the  Work  and  to 
make  a  Map  of  it.  Also  the  Trustees  are  to  him  sufficient 
Help  to  compleat  the  Work  and  the  whole  Charge  to  be 
paid  by  the  Proprietors  at  the  Drawing  the  Lots — And  it 
is  further  ordered  that  the  Trustees  may  lay  out  a  Third 
Division  to  the  Westward  of  the  Colon)  Line  if  they  see 
cause  so  to  do  adjoining  to  said  Line 


THE  WESTCONNAUG  PURCHASE  97 


Committee 


Job  Greene 

Thomas  Harris 

Richard  Waterman 

Resolved  Waterman 
Joshua  Winsor  is  chosen  a  committee  Man  in  the  Room  and 
Stead  of  Resolved  Waterman  Deceased 

pr  Job  Greene  Clerk16a 

At  a  Meeting  of  the  Proprietors  of  Westquanaug  at  the 
House  of  Mrs  Mary  Carder  in  Warwick  November  the 
fourth  1718    .   . 

There  being  a  Map  presented  by  the  Committee  of 
said  Westquanaug  of  a  Second  Division  within  the  Colony 
Lines  and  one  Division  to  the  Westward  of  said  Colony 
Line  to  each  Proprietor: — Ordered  to  draw  Lots  of  said 
Second  Division  according  to  former  Order  and  also  Unan- 
imously agreed  on  to  draw  Lot  for  to  the  westward  of  the 
Colony  Line  also  both  said  Divisions  were  drawn  accord- 
ingly But  there  arising  some  Dispute  between  Nicholas 
Carr  and  the  Rest  of  the  Grand  Children  of  Gov1'  Caleb 
Carr  of  Newport  Deceased  about  Carr's  Right  said  Grand 
Children  claiming  equal  Right  with  said  Nicholas  Carr: 
The  Proprietors  taking  the  Matter  into  Consideration  have 
ordered  that  Carr's  Alotments  shall  be  placed  to  the 
original  Right  of  said  Gov1'  Carr  deceased 

And  it  is  also  ordered  that  Fones's  Lotments  be  placed 
in  the  original  Right  of  capt  John  Fones  Deceased  by  the 
free  Consent  of  his  Son  John  Fones — there  having  been 
some  dispute  before  the  Proprietors  about  the  same  by 
Fones's  Son  and  Grand  Children 16b 

Ordered  Whereas  there  was  a  Mistake  in  Greene's 
Right  in  the  Second  Division  That  Lotment  having  no 
orderly  Draft  with  the  Rest  notwithstanding  N°-  47  was 
left  undrawn  for  by  Reason  of  the  Said  Mistake  Therefore 
It  is  Ordered  that  Major  Job  Green  may  take  up  the  same 
Number  of  Acres  that  is  in  N°-  47  in  any  part  of  the  undi- 
vided Land  by  Consent  of  the  Committee  off  the  Main 
Land  for  himself  and  Brothers  and  Richards  Daughters  if 


98  RHODE  ISLAM)  HISTORICAL  SOCIETY 

he  do  not  like  Number  4-7  and  Number  47  to  be  laid  down 

to  the  Proprietors  again  

p  Job  Greene  Clerk 


Advertisement 
These  are  to  give  Notice  to  all  the  Proprietors  of  the  Land 
known  by  the  Name  of  Westquanaug  within  the  Jurisdic- 
tion of  Scituate""  in  the  County  of  Providence  in  the  Col- 
on)- of  Rhode  Island  &c  to  meet  together  on  the  First  Tues- 
day of  July  next  which  will  be  the  second  Day  of  said 
Month  at  the  House  of  Mrs  Mary  Carder  in  Warwick  in 
said  County  in  order  to  hear  the  Proceedings  of  the  Com- 
mittee in  Laying  out  said  Land  and  to  receive  from  the 
Surveyor  the  PLAT  of  the  Several  Divisions  of  said  Land 
and  to  pay  the  Several  incidental  Charges  which  have  ac- 
crued from  the  Last  Meeting  of  said  Proprietors  and  to  act 
and  Do  any  other  Business  that  the  said  Proprietors  shall 
think  needful  about  the  Premises 

Warwick  June  the  7th  1  734  By  order  of  the  Committee 
per  Mr  Job  Greene  Clerk  of  said  Proprietors 


"Joseph  Fry  of  Newport  sold  to  Stephen  Eastern  of  Newport  the  half 
part  of  a  share  or  sixtieth  part  of  the  Westquanoag  Purchase,  May  31, 
1716.    (R.  I.  Land  Ev.  Ill,  243.) 

";a()n  lime  9,  1718,  John  Rhodes  of  Warwick  sold  to  John  Turner  a 
half  share  of  the  "Westquodnaig11  purchase  which  was  half  of  a  partner- 
ship "with  my  uncle  Peleg  Rhodes."     (Prov.   Deeds,  IV,   72.) 

l0bCapt.  John  Fones  in  his  will  Feb.  14,  1703,  left  one  half  of  his 
Westconnaug  purchase  to  his  son  John,  and  divided  the  other  half  between 
his  son  Samuel  and  his  grandson  Fones  Greene.  (N.  Ki.  Wills.) 

11  On  Feb.  20,  1730-1  the  Town  of  Scituate  was  incorporated.  All  of 
the  Westconnaug  Purchase  that  was  within  Rhode  Island  was  included 
in  Scituate. 


Heraldic  Notes 

MALBONE 

Antiques  for  February  1933,  contains  an  illustration  of 
a  si  her  mug  engraved  with  a  coat-of-arms  and  the  words 
Godfrey  Malbone,  1742.    This  mug  is  now  owned  by  the 


HERALDIC  NOTES 


99 


Reverend  Malbone  H.  Birckhead  of  Wynnewood,  Penna. 
The  arms  are  an  impaled  coat,  or  two  bendlets  corn-pony 
gules  and  ermine  for  Malbone  impaling  argent  on  a  jess 
between  three  Catherine  wheels  as  many  lambs  passant, 
for  Scott.  The  color  of  the  wheels  and  lambs  is  not  dis- 
cernible in  the  illustration. 


Silver  mug  which  belonged  to  Godfrey  Malbone  of  Newport. 
It  is  owned  by  the  Rev.  Malbone  H.  Birckhead. 

Courtesy  of  "Antiques" 

E.  Alfred  Jones  in  Antiques  describes  the  Malbone  arms 
as  Or  two  bendlets  gobony  ermine  and  gules  and  adds  that 
"The  arms  of  Malbone  were  granted  in  1683  to  George 
Malbon  of  Bradley  in  the  county  of  Chester."  Burke  does 
not  give  this  coat  but  gives  Or  two  bends  gobonated  argent 
and  gules.  Ormerod  in  his  History  of  Chester,  III,  318, 
states  that  the  ancient  arms  of  the  Malbons  of  Bradeley 
Hall,  Or  two  bendlets  componi  argent  and  gules  "were  dis- 


100 


KHODK  ISLAM)   H  I STORICAL  SOCIETY 


allowed  by  Dugdale  in  the  visitation  of  1663-4."  The 
change  from  argent  to  ermine  may  have  been  for  difference 
or  more  probably  someone  mistook  diapering  for  ermine  and 
so  accidently  made  a  differenced  coat.  The  impaled  arms 
are  those  of  Scott  and  as  Godfrey  Malbone  married 
Catherine  Scott  in  1719,  the  arms  clearly  represent  this 
marriage  and  are  the  arms  of  Malbone  impaling  Scott, 
which  would  of  course  be  the  arms  of  Godfrey  Malbone, 
Senior. 


SCOTT 


The  arms  of  Scott,  as  engraved  on  the  silver  mug,  are 
the  same  as  those  of  Thomas  Scott  of  Great  Barr,  in  Staf- 
fordshire, as  illustrated  on  page  299  of  the  1  724  edition'1 
of  Guillim's  Display  of  Heraldry.  In  the  text  these  arms 
are  given  as  Argent  on  a  fess  gules,  cottised  azure,  three 
lambs  of  the  first,  bet-ween  as  many  katherine-wheels  sable, 
but  in  the  illustration  the  cottises  are  omitted.  Dr.  Bow- 
ditch  suggests  that  the  engraver  may  have  merely  turned 
to  Guillim  for  a  Scott  coat,  found  that  of  Scott  of  Great 
Barr,  Staffordshire,  and  then,  overlooking  the  cottises  in 
the  description,  copied  Guillim's  wood-cut.  He  may  have 
shaded  the  fess  for  artistic  effect. 

The  Catharine  Scott  who  was  married  to  Godfrey  Mal- 
bone in  1719,  was  the  daughter  of  John  Scott  and  Eliza- 
beth Wanton,'"'  and  so  granddaughter'"  of  John  Scott  and 
great-granddaughter  of  Richard  Scott  of  Providence. 

Mm.  In  edition  of  1679.  '-'#.  /.  Hist.  Tracts  3,  pages  1+  and  17. 
^Austin  Gen.  Diet,  of  R.  /..  pjwjes  21  5,  372  and  373. 


Form  of  Legacy 


"/  give  and  bequeath  to  the  Rhode  Island 
Historical  Society  the  sum  of 
dollars. " 


Kix.i-r  Williams  Press        rVJL^ 


E.  A.  Johnson  Co. 


PKOVIDI   N<   I 


Rhode    Island 

Historical  Society 
Collections 


Vol.  XXVI 


OCTOBER,   1933 


No.  4 


,'  Oct 


'***■ 


COLONEL   WILLIAM    BARTON  S  SWORDS 

The  upper  one  is  the  dress  sword  presented  by  Congress  to  Colonel  Barton, 
and  the  lower  one  is  Colonel  Barton's  service  sword. 

These  swords  were  recently  f resented  to  the 
Society  by  James  A.  Barton  and  George  C.  Barton, 
great-great-grandsons  of  Colonel  Barton, 


Issued  Quarterly 


68  Waterman  Street,  Providence,  Rhode  Island 


CONTENTS 


PAGE 

Colonel  Barton's  Swords   .....  Cover 

Roger  Williams 

by  Michael  Freund 

translated  by  James  Ernst  .          .          .          .  101 

Queen's  Fort    .          .          .          .          .          .          .  133 

Notes 133 

New  Publications  of  Rhode  Island  Interest .          .  134 

Bark  Newport           .          .          .          .          .          .  135 

Fort  Flags       .         .         .         .          .          .         .  136 


RHODE 
HISTORICAL 


ISLAND 


SOCIETY 


COLLECTIONS 


Vol.  XXVI 


OCTOBER,  1933 


No.  4 


William  Davis  Miller,  President   Gilbert  A.  Harrington,  Treasurer 
Howard  W.  Preston,  Secretary  Howard  M.  Chapin,  Librarian 


The  Society  assumes  no  responsibility  for  the  statements  or  the  opinions 
of  contributors. 


Roger  Williams,   Apostle  of  Complete 
Religious  Liberty 

By  Michael  Freund 
Translated  by  James  Ernst 

With  special  'permission  of  the  copyright  owner 


Translator's  Note 

In  Der  Idee  Der  Toleranz  Im  England  Der  Gross  en 
Revolution,  published  in  1927,  Michael  Freund  presents 
a  painstaking  study  of  the  historical  development  of  the 
idea  of  toleration  in  England,  and  especially  its  many- 
sided  expressions  during  the  Civil  War  from  1 642  to  1 648. 
The  study  was  prepared  under  the  direction  of  the  Faculty 
of  Philosophy  of  the  University  of  Munich,  after  a  year  of 
research  in  the  British  Museum,  London,  and  deserves, 
therefore,  more  than  a  passing  notice  from  those  interested 


102  RHODE  ISLAND  HISTORICAL  SOCIETY 

in  Roger  Williams  and  his  ideas.  Freund  gives  Williams 
a  place  of  importance  second  to  none  of  the  twenty-four 
Englishmen,  from  Sir  Thomas  More  to  Sir  Henry  Vane, 
whose  writings  are  analyzed  and  whose  philosophy  of 
toleration  is  critically  examined.  Only  the  poet  John 
Milton  is  given  a  greater  number  of  pages  in  a  discussion 
of  his  ideas  of  toleration,  than  are  given  to  Williams ;  while 
such  famous  political  thinkers  as  John  Goodwin,  Dr.  Owen, 
James  Harrington  and  Sir  Henry  Vane  are  accorded  fewer 
pages  each  than  are  devoted  to  him. 

This  original  and  highly  provocative  analysis  of  the 
ideas  of  Williams  on  toleration  and  religious  liberty  must, 
however,  be  read  with  caution,  for  Freund  was  misled 
when  he  trusted  so  implicitly  the  biographies  of  Williams 
then  available.  I  shall  suggest  only  a  few  of  the  corrections 
necessary.  (  1  )  Williams  is  wrongly  grouped  with  the 
Anabaptist  thinkers.  His  contemporaries  in  England  and 
New  England  recognized  him  as  an  Independent,  and 
Freund  should  have  grouped  Williams  with  Dr.  Owen, 
John  Goodwin  and  the  poet  Milton.  (  2  )  His  religious  views 
were  not  of  "baptisticher  natur"  at  any  time.  Williams 
had  become  a  Seeker  in  August,  1635.  It  was  customary 
in  the  1 7th  century  to  call  all  who  dissented  from  the 
established  religions,  "Anabaptists",  in  the  same  way  as 
today  in  America  all  social  radicals  and  political  dissenters 
are  called  "Reds"  and  "Communists."  (  3  )  He  agreed  that 
the  "reason  of  the  law"  is  more  important  than  the  "will 
of  the  law."  (4)  He  rejected  the  contemporary  view  of 
toleration  and  demanded  "absolute  soul-liberty"  in  reli- 
gious matters.  (  5  )  Within  fixed  constitutional  limits,  Wil- 
liams held  that  the  power  of  the  state,  as  representative 
of  the  majority  of  the  people,  ought  to  be  absolute  in  civil 
things.  Legal  and  just  punishment  of  offenders  against 
the  civil  laws  he  designated  as  "prosecution"  as  distinct 
from  "persecution."  (  6  )  He  held  the  state  ought  to  give 
permission  and  protection  to  the  "bodies  and  goods"  of  the 
churches  and  church-members,  whether  true  or  false,  in 


ROGER  WILLIAMS  103 

their  civil  relations,  and  that  the  churches  ought  to  obey 
the  civil  laws  and  pray  for  the  safety  and  welfare  of  the 
state,  though  pagan.  (7)  He  was  a  Biblicist  and  not  a 
Calvinist,  after  1630.  And  although  he  took  some  of  his 
ideas  from  John  Calvin  and  Martin  Luther,  he  never 
hesitated  to  disagree  with  each  of  them  in  certain  matters. 
For  example,  he  held  to  Luther's  doctrines  of  Free-Grace 
and  of  conditional  Election  because  he  believed  they  were 
Pauline  and  Biblical.'  (8)  Freund  does  not  attempt  to 
develop  fully  Williams'  doctrines  of  government  by  the 
"free  consent  of  the  People"  and  the  Rights  of  Man.  These 
he  discusses  only  as  they  relate  to  the  idea  of  absolute 
toleration.  (9 )  Nor  does  Freund  bring  out  the  close  rela- 
tion of  Seekerism  and  the  scientific  movement  of  the  1 7th 
century  with  Williams'  doctrine  of  religious  liberty. 

With  these  preliminary  remarks  as  a  guide,  we  are  ready 
to  begin  the  essay  by  Michael  Freund:  {Der  Idee  Der 
Toleranz.  Halle,  1927.  Pp.  241-268.) 

Translation 

The  ripest  fruit  of  the  Baptist  literature  of  Toleration 
is  the  work  on  Tolerance  by  Roger  Williams.  The  tolera- 
tion-idea of  Williams  found  its  most  significant  expression 
in  his  work  entitled  The  Bloudy  Tenent  of  Persecution, 
but  received,  to  be  sure,  further  elucidation  and  exposition 
m  his  other  writings.  (  Queries  of  Highest  Consideration, 
(1664).  Edited  by  R.  A.  Guild,  N.  C,  P.,  Vol.  II.  The 
Bloody  Tenent  Yet  More  Bloody,  (1652).  Edited  by 
S.  L.  Caldwell,  N.  C.  P.,  Vol.  IV.  A  well-rounded  portrait 
of  his  mind  and  character  is  given  in  the  collected  letters 
which  J.  R.  Bartlett  arranged  and  entitled  The  Letters 
of  Roger  Williams,  N.  C.  P.,  Vol.  VI.)  W7illiams  suffered 
persecution  upon  his  own  person.  In  1631  he  had  come 
to  New  England,  and  soon  thereafter  was  called  to  be  the 
Teacher  at  Salem.  His  opinions  brought  him  into  sharp 
opposition  to  the  church  and  state  in  New  England,  and 


104  RHODE  ISLAND  HISTORICAL  SOCIETY 

finally  caused  his  banishment  out  of  the  colonies.  (The 
exact  causes  of  his  banishment  are  in  controversy:  his 
opinions  about  tolerance  —  as  the  customary  view  main- 
tains— indeed  scarcely  stand  in  the  foreground.  His  doubt  of 
the  legality  of  the  Patent  of  the  colony,  which  according  to 
his  conception  gave  over  illegally  to  foreign  ownership 
the  land  of  the  Indian  and  his  demand  for  a  radical  separa- 
tion from  the  Anglican  church  stirred  up  a  more  vehement 
opposition  than  his  conception  of  the  relation  of  the  state 
and  church.  The  entire  question  is  fully  discussed  by 
J.  L.  Diman  in  his  introduction  to  John  Cotton's  Answer  to 
Roger  Williams,  N.  C.  P.,  Vol.  II.  This  discussion  centers 
chiefly  on  the  question  of  "rigid  separation"  and  contributes 
also  to  clarify  their  controversy. )  In  the  midst  of  a  winter 
snowstorm — as  he  himself  has  often  pathetically  described 
— he  was  forced  to  seek  for  himself  a  new  homestead.  In 
1636  he  founded  Providence,  a  new  colony,  upon  his  own 
land  which  he  purchased  from  the  Indian  tribe.  The  mem- 
bers of  the  new  colony  promised  to  submit  themselves  to 
the  majority  in  all  matters:  but  only  in  civil  things.  Vane 
helped  him  to  procure  the  charter  for  the  colony.  In  1 643, 
because  of  disputes  among  the  [New  England]  colonies, 
Williams  went  to  London  in  order  to  obtain  the  authority 
for  the  settling  of  some  of  these  disputes.  The  religious- 
political  war  then  going  on  in  England  stimulated  him 
into  carrying  forward  a  definitive  discussion  of  his  con- 
troversy with  Cotton,  his  Puritan  antagonist  in  New  Eng- 
land. In  this  way  originated,  in  1644,  The  Bloudy  Tenent, 
to  which  later  on  there  was  connected  a  lively  controversy. 
The  deliberations  of  the  Westminster  Assembly,  ( Trans- 
lator's Note:  The  Westminster  Assembly,  composed  of  120 
Puritan  and  Scotch  Presbyterian  clergymen,  was  created  in 
the  summer  of  1  643  to  assist  Parliament  in  preparing  a  uni- 
form system  of  church  Order  and  polity.  It  was  continu- 
ously in  session  without  accomplishing  any  important  matter 
until  dismissed  by  Cromwell  through  Parliament  in  1  649  ) 
and  in  connection  with  it  the  joint  publication  of  a  pamphlet 


ROGER  WILLIAMS  105 

by  the  Independent  members,  (  Transl.  Note:  Apologeticall 
Narration,  (  1644)  by  The  Five  Dissenting  Brethren. 
British  Museum )  called  forth  his  Queries  of  Highest  Con- 
sideration. His  religious  views  were  of  "baptisticher 
Natur",  but  he  finally  separated  himself  from  every  reli- 
gious association  and  passed  his  last  days  as  a  solitary 
"Seeker".  America  honors  in  him  one  of  her  greatest 
minds.  „ 

As  previously  stated,  TheBloudy  Tenent  of  Persecutions 
a  discussion  with  Cotton,  who  defended  a  relative-toleration 
position  and  whose  opinions  were  in  need  of  a  clearer  repre- 
sentation, wherewith  Williams  sets  forth  the  historical  sig- 
nificance of  the  idea  in  its  true  light.  (  Of  course,  Williams 
presents  to  Cotton  also  his  opinions  concerning  "The  Model 
of  Church  and  Civil  Power"  of  the  New  England  churches, 
of  which  Cotton  later  on  denies  his  co-authorship. )  Cotton, 
as  we  shall  see,  also  divided  the  spheres  of  state  and  church 
rather  strictly:  both  have  their  own  End,  their  own  duties, 
and  their  own  functions.  Over  the  church  stands  God  as 
the  only  Law-giver.  The  members  of  the  church,  as  such, 
have  no  right  to  challenge  the  state-authority  by  offering 
any  resistance  against  it.  Insofar  as  opposition  to  the  civil 
power  is  permitted,  it  is  exercised  by  the  church-members 
as  members  of  the  state  and  not  as  members  of  the  church. 
Man  does  not  live  in  society  and  the  state  as  a  religious 
being.  Although  both  authorities  are  clearly  separated 
from  one  another,  they  are  not  independent  of  one  another: 
they  are  inseparably  intangled  one  with  the  other;  they 
grow  and  blossom  together,  and  perish  together.  The 
decline  of  the  state,  says  Cotton,  has  always  been  a  sequel 
to  the  decay  of  the  church.  {Bloudy  Tenent  of  Persecu- 
tion, p.  191.  Freund  uses  the  edition  of  the  Hanserd 
Knollys  Society  edited  by  Edward  Bean  Underhill. 
London,  1  848. )  The  church  educates  the  people  to  become 
good  subjects  and  perfect  members  of  society.  State  and 
church  are  mutually  bound  to  govern  and  support  each 
other.    When  the  church  disintegrates  the  state  must  re- 


106  RHODE  ISLAM)  H  ISTORICAL  SOCIETY 

form  it j  and  when  the  state  strays  from  the  path  of  justice, 
the  church  must  lead  it  back  onto  the  right  course:  therefore, 
one  state,  one  church.  Just  as  tolerant  as  the  church  ought 
to  be  to  those  within  her  own  bosom,  so  little  is  an  organized 
community  able  to  tolerate  different  churches  and  sects 
side  by  side.  "For  our  tolerating  many  religions  in  a  state 
in  several  churches,  besides  the  provoking  of  God,  may  in 
time  not  only  corrupt,  leaven,  divide,  and  so  destroy  the 
peace  of  the  churches,  but  also  dissolve  the  continuity  of 
the  state,  especially  ours,  whose  walls  are  made  of  the 
stones  of  the  churches,  it  being  also  contrary  to  the  end  of 
our  planting  in  this  part  of  the  world,  which  was  not  only 
to  enjoy  the  pure  ordinances,  but  to  enjoy  them  all  in 
purity."  ( Bloudy  Tenent,  p.  240. )  The  church  must, 
however,  practice  toleration  in  things  not  fundamental. 
Even  in  the  sphere  of  the  liturgy,  she  ought  and  must 
grant  diversity  and  variety  of  forms.  The  principle  must 
be  one  of  unity  and  not  uniformity.  In  things  fundamental, 
however,  which  are  so  public  and  clear  that  only  base  desire 
opposes  them,  no  tolerance  dare  be  shown.  After  proper 
admonition,  the  church  hands  the  heretic  over  to  the  state 
which  may  then  deliver  him  to  the  executioner.  Cotton 
also  reiterates  here  in  essentials  the  toleration-program  of 
the  sons  of  the  Renaissance:  that  ideal  of  "Comprehen- 
sion" which  influenced  Taylor  (Transl.  Note:  Taylor, 
Jeremy,  (  1613-1667)  Liberty  of  Prophesying,  1 649  )  and 
Chillingworth  (Transl.  Note:  Chillingworth,  William, 
(1602-1644),  The  Religon  of  Protestants  a  Safe  Way  of 
Salvation,  1638)  to  foster  the  idea  of  tolerance,  also  in- 
fluenced Williams'  The  Bloudy  Tenent. 

Sovereignty — which  brings  the  opinions  of  Cotton  in 
repeated  collision  with  the  idea  of  toleration  and  especially 
with  the  theory  of  the  Rights  of  Man — is  placed  by  Cotton 
under  absolutely  fixed  limits  and  rules.  The  state  has  no 
authority  to  consider  private  morals.  It  has,  moreover,  no 
authority  to  judge  in  disputes  between  children  and  par- 
ents, and  servants  and  masters.   Matters  of  private  morals 


ROGER  WILLIAMS  107 

come  under  the  competence  of  the  church  which  settles 
disputes  between  members  of  the  family  and  between  serv- 
ants and  masters:  "Domestic  evils  are  best  healed  in  a 
domestic  way."  {Bloody  Tenent  Yet  More  Bloody, 
p.  284.)  Only  upon  a  request  from  the  church  may  the 
state  interpose  its  authority  in  this  sphere  of  social  life. 
More  serious,  however,  is  the  limitation  on  the  principle 
of  the  state's  authority.  The  power  of  the  state  originates 
through  the  transfer  or  the  rights  and  power  of  individuals 
to  the  highest  civil  authority ;  the  people  are,  moreover,  on 
this  earth  only  the  stewards  of  God  and  may  not  transfer 
this  right  and  authority  as  they  please.  "And  because  the 
Word  is  a  perfect  rule,  as  well  of  righteousness  as  of  holi- 
ness, it  will  be  therefore  necessary  that  neither  the  people 
give  consent,  nor  that  the  magistrate  takes  power  to  dis- 
pose of  the  bodies,  goods,  lands,  liberties  of  the  people, 
but  according  to  the  laws  and  rules  of  the  Word  of  God." 
{Bloudy  Tenent,  p.  219. )  The  civil  authority  may  impose 
nothing  by  virtue  of  its  authority  alone ;  it  is  obliged,  "to 
show  the  reason,  not  only  the  will."  {Ibid.  p.  220.)  Nor 
may  the  state  control  and  regulate  "indifferent"  matters, 
unless  it  has  cogent  reasons  to  give  for  such  action.  Not 
the  state  but  divine  truth  creates  the  social  right.  This 
divine  truth  is  indeed  a  "perfect  rule,"  compulsory  and 
unequivocal,  and  can  therefore  dispense  with  the  interpret- 
ing power.  Cotton  recognizes  the  viewpoint  of  Hobbes. 
(Transl.  Note:  Hobbes,  Thomas,  ( 1588-1679 )  see  Works) 
as  the  hostile  principle  opposed  to  his  world  of  ideas  which 
he  restates  in  similar  words  and  vigorously  attacks:  "Au- 
toritas,  non  Veritas  facit  legem."  "He  hath  no  power  to 
make  any  such  laws  about  indifferent  things,  wherein  noth- 
ing good  or  evil  is  shown  to  the  people,  but  only  on  prin- 
cipally the  mere  authority  or  will  of  the  imposer  for  the 
observance  of  them."  {Ibid.  p.  220.)  "The  will  of  no 
man  is  regula  recti,  unless  it  be  regula  recta."  {Ibid. 
p.  220)  Not  the  will  of  the  law-giver  but  the  reason  of  the 
law  must  be  the  plumbline  of  the  human  conscience.    Not 


108  RHODK  ISLAND  HISTORICAL  SOCIETY 

the  authority  of  the  supreme  power,  but  the  "Reason"  of 
the  law  hinds:  "Ratio  est  rex  legis  et  lex  rex  regis."  (Ibid. 
p.  221.)    .    .    . 

Williams  carries  out  the  division  between  worldly  and 
religious  affairs  much  more  sharply,  consistently  and  radi- 
cally than  does  Cotton.  The  separation  is  so  thoroughly 
carried  out  that  no  bridges  may  lead  across  to  reunite  the 
two  worlds.  The  two  worlds,  the  spiritual  and  the  civil, 
can  no  longer  lay  claims  to  each  other.  With  this  con- 
ception it  is  not  possible  to  stretch  a  connecting-line  across 
(from  the  spiritual  world)  to  the  Rights  of  Man  .  .  . 
According  to  the  conception  of  Williams,  in  contrast  to 
that  of  Cotton,  the  two  worlds  are  in  themselves  sovereign 
and  do  not  mutually  limit  each  other,  since  they  exist  on 
two  such  entirely  different  levels  that  they  are  completely 
separated. 

For  this  reason  Williams  lays  the  stress  upon  it  to  indi- 
cate his  intrinsic  conclusion — the  real  self-sufficiency  of  the 
civil  and  social  world.  State  and  society  are  natural  powers, 
forms  and  creations  of  nature.  ( Just  for  that  reason,  they 
are  not  comprehensible  and  conceivable  through  the  doc- 
trine of  rights,  because  they  in  fact  discard  the  spiritual 
"Existenz"  to  which  rights  alone  are  able  to  appeal. )  In 
the  blood  relationship  of  families  exists  the  prototype  of 
states  and,  as  people  increase  and  propagate  themselves 
independently  and  beyond  religion  of  all  kinds,  so  they  in 
time  also  agree  to  form  social  combinations.  "If  none  but 
true  Christians,  members  of  Christ  Jesus,  might  be  civil 
magistrates,  and  publicly  entrusted  with  civil  affairs,  then 
none  but  members  of  churches,  Christians,  should  be  hus- 
bands of  wives,  fathers  of  children,  masters  of  servants.  But 
against  this  doctrine  the  whole  creation,  the  whole  world, 
may  justly  rise  up  in  arms,  as  not  only  contrary  to  true 
piety,  but  common  humanity  itself."  (Bloudy  Tenent, 
p.  285. )  "Magistracy  is  of  God,  but  yet  no  otherwise  than 
marriage  is,  being  an  estate  merely  civil  and  humane  and 
lawful  to  all  nations  of  the  world."    (Bloody  Tenent  Yet 


ROGER  WILLIAMS  109 

More  Bloody,  p.  282. )  Each  state  is  legitimate  just  as  life 
and  nature  are  legitimate.  Man  is  by  nature  a  social  crea- 
ture, and  enters  social  relationships  long  before  he  awakens 
to  religion.  "We  shall  find  lawful  civil  states,  both  before 
and  since  Christ,  in  which  we  find  not  any  tidings  of  the 
true  God  or  Christ."  (Bloudy  Tenent,  p.  247.)  There 
is  "a  civil  ministry,  or  office,  merely  human  and  civil,  which 
men  agree  to  constitute,  called  therefore  a  human  creation, 
and  is  true  and  lawful  in  those  nations,  cities,  kingdoms, 
etc.,  which  never  heard  of  the  true  God,  nor  his  holy  Son 
Jesus,  as  in  any  part  of  the  world  besides,  where  the  name 
of  Jesus  is  most  taken  up."   {Ibid.  p.  132. ) 

Society  and  state  are  integral  wherever  religious-liberty 
prevails  in  the  entire  state.    The  civil  state  is  in  itself  entire 
and  competent,  "which  compactness  may  be  found  in  many 
towns  and  cities  of  the  world  where  yet  has  not  shined  any 
spiritual  or" supernatural  goodness."    (Ibid.  p.  211.)    All 
over  the  world  with  its  thousand-fold  religious  differences, 
the  object,  nature  and  origin  of  the  civil  authority  is  always 
the  same.    The  origin  is  everywhere  the  choice  and  free 
consent  of  the  people,  and  the  object,  the  well  being  of  the 
members  or  the  safety  of  the  people  in  property  and  life. 
The  state  transcends  religion.    It  receives  from  religion 
no  enhancement  of  its  authority,  no  more  than  is  added  to 
our  animal  life  by  our  Christian  confession.    There  is  no 
longer  any  Christian  state,  but  only  purely  a  civil  state. 
The  state  having  developed  into  a  pure  "Existence  form" 
and  into  a  perfect  abstraction  has  freed  itself  of  all  foreign 
accretions.    "The  civil  nature  of  the  magistrate  we  have 
proved  to  receive  no  addition  of  power  from  the  magis- 
trate being  a  Christian,  no  more  than  it  receives  diminution 
from  his  not  being  a  Christian,  even  as  the  commonweal  is 
a  true  commonweal,  although  it  have  not  heard  of  Chris- 
tianity." (Ibid.p.304-.) 

If  the  Christian  state  had  the  right  of  persecution,  then 
this  right  would  not  be  merely  peculiar  to  the  Christian 
state  but  to  the  state  in  the  abstract.    When  the  Christian 


110  RHODE  ISLAND  HISTORICAL  SOCIETY 

state  also  imputes  to  itself  the  right  of  persecution,  then  it 
approves  this  right  to  all  the  states  of  the  world.  That 
would  have  a  rather  ominous  effect  upon  the  Christian 
religion;  for  of  thirty  parts  of  the  world,  twenty-five  are 
non-Christian.  {Bloody  Tenent  Yet  Mors  Bloody,  p.  161.  ) 
"And  if  so — that  the  magistrates  receive  their  power  of 
g  erning  the  church  from  the  people — undeniably  it 
follows,  that  a  people,  as  a  people,  naturally  considered  of 
what  nature  or  nation  soever  in  Europe,  Asia,  Africa,  or 
America,  have  fundamentally  and  originally  as  men,  a 
power  to  govern  the  church,  to  see  her  do  her  duty,  to 
correct  her,  to  redress,  reform,  establish,  etc."  (  Bloudy 
Tenent,  p.  215.  ) 

Interestingly,  the  idea  of  the  essential  equality  of  all 
states  and  the  identity  of  the  efficacy  of  all  states  re-enforces 
the  democratic  woof  in  the  thought  of  Williams.  For 
Williams,  the  state  is  not  an  independent  principle,  but  a 
function  of  society  and  an  organ  of  the  "Nation",  insofar 
as  Williams  understands  it.  Before  the  states  there  were 
the  "Nations'1 — "Nations"  which  as  phenomena  of  the 
natural  world  are  essentially  alike.  "If  the  magistrate  has 
received  any  such  charge  or  commission  from  God  in 
spiritual  things,  doubtless,  as  before,  the  people  have  re- 
ceived it  originally  and  fundamentally  as  they  are  a  peo- 
ple. (  Bloody  Tenent  Yet  More  Bloody,  p.  1  89.  )  There  is 
no  right  and  no  essence  in  the  state  which  does  not  rest  in 
the  people.  No  group  of  people  have,  however,  more  rights 
than  any  other,  as  Williams  viewed  the  people  in  a  nature - 
rightly,  unhistorical  being.  "Primarily  and  fundamentally 
they  are  the  civil  magistrate."  [Ibid.  p.  210.  The  sover- 
eignty of  the  "Nations"  implies,  however,  the  sovereignty 
of  the  world.  In  the  state  the  many  govern  inseparably; 
only  a  few  are,  however,  elected.  The  state  which  Williams 
alone  recognizes,  the  democratic  state,  can  neither  be  the 
sovereignty  of  the  Saints  nor  supply  the  place  of  religious 
authority.  The  sovereignty  of  the  state  over  religion  must, 
moreover,  always  imply  anti-religious  sovereignty,  at  least 


ROGEK  WILLIAMS  HI 

a-religious  force  over  religious  matters,  always  a  foreign- 
authority  over  the  church  of  God   .    .   .) 

The  internal  detachment  of  the  state  from  religion  signi- 
fies especially  for  Williams  the  self-sufficiency  of  the  state, 
the  organization  of  the  phenomenon  "state"  in  its  "ideal- 
typichen"  purity.  The  mingling  of  state  and  church  implies 
as  well  the  negation  of  Christendom,  as  of  the  state:  "It 
denies  the  principle  of  Christianity  and  civility."  '  ( Bloudy 
Tenent,  p.  2.)  The  state  burdened  with  religious  duties 
and  compassed  with  religious  regulations  is  not  a  perfect 
state:  (With  this  one  may  compare  Karl  Marx:  "The  so- 
called  Christian  state  is  an  imperfect  state  and  the  Chris- 
tian religion  is  permitted  by  the  state  as  a  complement  and 
as  a  sanctification  of  its  civil  imperfection.  The  state  is  in 
this  instance  "Theologe  ex  professo",  not  yet  state  as  a 
"state."  Zur  Judenjrage. )  Persecution,  therefore,  is  an 
inimical  state  principle:  a  "body-killing,  soul-killing,  state- 
killing  doctrine."  (  Bloudy  Tenent,  p.  378. )  It  unites  the 
legitimate  civil  relations  which  have  at  least  according  to 
Williams  their  origin  in  natural  circumstances,  on  the  condi- 
tion of  fixed  religious  qualifications,  and  denies  them  at  the 
same  time  as  their  own  rights.  (Williams  perceived  in  the 
principle  of  persecution  not  merely  the  negation  of  the  state, 
but  according  to  his  state-theory  a  denial  of  the  natural 
existence  of  mankind,  of  "nature,"  and  the  "world."  Per- 
secution demands  of  the  "world"  the  religious  proof  of  the 
"right  to  life,"  and  denies  thereby  its  right  to  existence  in 
itself.  For  Williams,  therefore,  intolerance  is  the  all-de- 
stroying power. )  And  so  the  taking-over  of  the  function  by 
the  state  is  "a  breach  of  civility."  (Bloudy  Tenent,  p.  49.) 
It  adds  a  foreign  element  to  the  state,  turns  it  into  a  "six- 
fingered  monster,"  {Bloody  Tenent  Yet  More  Bloody,  p. 
454)  and  cripples  it  thereby.  Intolerance  is  therefore 
"opposite  to  the  very  essentials  and  fundamentals  of  the 
nature  of  a  civil  magistrate."  {Queries  of  Highest  Con- 
sideration, p.  35.)  By  means  of  it  is  "civil  society  plucked 
up  by  the  roots."    (Bloody   Tenent  Yet  More  Bloody, 


112  RHODE  ISLAND  HISTORICAL  SOCIETY 

p.  207.)  Persecution  is  "dangerously  destructive  to  the 
verv  roots  ...  of  any  civil  being  of  the  world  itself." 
{Ibid.  p.  238.) 

Thus  the  state  exists  in  itself  and  is  set  free  in  every 
way  from  all  fixed  duties  concerning  religious  matters.  It 
exists  instead  as  a  civil  state,  and  only  as  a  civil  state.  I  Ipon 
it  God's  people  have  no  claims.  "It  is  plausible,  but  not 
reasonable,  that  God's  people  should,  considering  the  drift 
of  these  positions,  expect  more  liberty  under  a  Christian 
than  under  a  heathen  magistrate."  (Bloudy  Tenent, 
p.  340. )  The  state  may  deliver  none  of  its  essence  or  its 
functions  over  to  religion.  "Peace"  says  to  "Truth,"  this 
pamphlet  is  in  the  form  of  a  dialogue  between  Peace  and 
Truth:  "I  know  you  would  not  take  from  Caesar  ought, 
although  it  were  to  give  to  God."  (Ibid.,  p.  294. )  The 
state  is  entirely  withdrawn  from  any  religious  authority. 
As  a  "Stuck  Natur,"  according  to  its  inner  essence,  the  state 
is  incapable  of  responding  in  general  to  the  claims  of  re- 
ligion; for  that  purpose  it  is  without  an  "organ."  It  is  a 
dead  thing,  soulless,  unspiritual:  "Spiritual  cannot  reach  to 
artificial  or  civil."  {Ibid.  p.  247.)  Cotton  had  made  it 
clear  that  the  walls  of  the  New  England  states  were  built 
out  of  the  stones  of  the  church,  to  which  Williams  replied: 
"The  walls  of  earth  or  stone  about  a  city,  are  the  natural 
or  artificial  wall  or  defence  of  it."  ( Ibid.  p.  246. )  Only 
the  "natural"  can  protect  the  "natural."  Only  the  natural 
can  operate  upon  the  state  which  is  without  an  "organ" 
for  the  commands  and  claims  of  religious  matters.  Christ 
has  never  made  any  promises  to  the  state.  "It  pleased  not 
the  Lord  Jesus  to  give  by  himself  or  his  apostles  to  the 
civil  magistrates,  king  or  governor,  any  particular  rules 
or  directions  concerning  their  behaviour  or  carriage  in  civil 
magistracy,  as  they  have  done  expressly  concerning  the 
duty  of  fathers,  mothers,  children,  masters,  servants,  yea, 
and  of  subjects  toward  magistrates."  (Ibid.  p.  85.)  The 
words  to  Peter  to  put  his  sword  into  the  sheath  are  directed 
to  the  church  of  Christ  and  not  to  the  state  which  for  that 


ROGER  WILLIAMS  113 

reason  retains  the  power  over  life  and  death.  The  sword  is 
also  not  to  be  drawn  in  defence  of  religion,  especially  when 
it  is  endangered.   {Ibid.  p.  360.) 

The  need  of  releasing  the  states  from  religious  rule  is 
especially  manifest  in  the  impetuous  slaughtering  of  the 
religious  wars.  Williams  speaks  sorrowfully  "of  the 
nations  and  peoples  slaughtering  each  other  for  their 
several  respective  religions  and  consciences."  (Ibid.  p.  37.) 
The  decline  of  the  religious  wars  is  largely  owing  to  the 
more  temperate  adherents  of  the  idea  of  toleration.  The 
"Politisierung  of  Politik"  had  indeed  already  made  such 
advances  that  it  was  possible  even  to  subordinate  foreign- 
politics  to  the  End  of  religious  propaganda.  Especially  is 
this  true  of  Cromwell's  very  Protestant-tinged  foreign 
politics  which  is,  to  be  sure,  always  only  a  device  to  interfere 
for  tolerance  and  the  protection  of  the  menaced  Protestant 
interests,  and  only  set  up  as  his  aim  in  the  conquest  of  Ireland 
(according  to  his  idealogy )  an  extension  of  the  Protestant 
religion  by  force  of  arms.  Milton  had  expressly  restricted 
the  hindrance  of  the  Catholic  faith,  which  he  promoted, 
to  national  boundaries.  The  extension  of  Catholics,  he 
held,  must  be  obstructed:  "I  mean  in  our  natives  and  not 
foreigners,  privileged  by  the  laws  of  nations."  (  Of  True 
Religion,  Heresy ,  and  Schism,  p.  1 42. )  Cotton  also  refuses 
to  permit  his  relative-tolerance  to  reach  beyond  the  state: 
"It  becomes  not  the  spirit  of  the  gospel  to  convert  aliens 
to  the  faith  .  .  .  with  fire  and  brimstone."  {Bloudy  Tenent, 
p.   106.) 

Williams  viewed  the  religious  wars,  however,  as  the  in- 
evitable consequence  of  the  "bloodie  tenent."  Seldom  does 
persecution  halt  at  the  national  boundaries.  And  why  should 
it?  The  duty  to  root  out  the  heretic  extends  out  beyond 
national  borders.  And  whoever  believes  in  this  duty,  "must 
needs  force  on  and  press  after  an  universal  conquest  of  all 
consciences,  and  under  that  ( like  those  bloody  Spaniards, 
Turkes  and  Popes )  lay  under  their  fair  cloak,  the  rule  and 
dominion  over  all   the   nations  of   the  earth."     {Bloody 


114  RHODE    ISLAND    HISTORICAL    SOCIETY 

Tenent  Yet  More  Bloody,  p.  337. )  Characteristic  of  Wil- 
liams is  his  repeated  warning  and  fear  of  it  that  intolerance 
in  this  religious  conquest  may  in  turn  consider  itself  as  a  sov- 
ereign power  of  a  world  kingdom.  What  slaughter  must 
then  follow  after  this  principle  of  intolerance  if  all  the  mil- 
lions of  heretics  should  be  put  to  death?  ( Ibid.  pp.  288,337. 
Queries  of  Highest  Consideration,  p.  27.)  Williams 
always  kept  the  world  situation  of  religion  constantly  in 
view.  Intolerance  must  involve  the  Christian  state  in  a  mad 
war  against  the  whole  world,  and  by  it  constantly  threaten 
mankind  by  plunging  all  the  nations  in  a  war  among  one 
another.  Back  of  intolerance  lurks  continually  a  world  con- 
flagration. The  intolerance  of  Queen  Elizabeth  had  almost 
set  the  whole  world  in  flames.  ( Bloody  Tenent  Yet  More 
Bloody,  p.  350.) 

From  the  basic  concept  of  W7illiams,  moreover,  there 
follows  not  only  peace  for  the  "Christian"  states  with  the 
heathen  world  around  them,  but  also  the  inner  justifica- 
tion of  the  heathen  states  as  the  proving  ground  and  as  the 
rulers  of  the  Saints.  All  spiritual  restraints  are  cleared  away 
from  economic  and  civil-social  associations.  The  children 
of  God  may  turn  to  the  pagan  states  to  obtain  from  them 
justice  in  social-civil  matters.  As  members  of  society  they 
may  have  traffic  with  pagans,  Jews  and  Turks.  Paul — 
Williams  maintains — shows  by  his  appeal  to  Caesar  the 
legality  of  having  civil  intercourse  with  such  persons  ( idol- 
ators),  with  whom  it  is  not  permitted  to  have  any  inter- 
course in  spiritual  matters:  "secretly  foretelling  that  mag- 
istrates and  people,  whole  states  and  kingdoms,  should  be 
idolatrous  and  anti-Christian,  yet  with  whom,  notwith- 
standing, the  Saints  and  churches  of  God  might  lawfully 
cohabit,  and  hold  civil  commerce  and  conversation." 
(  Bloudy  Tenent ,  p.  88. )  "And,  in  that  sense,  who  doubts 
but  God's  people  may  appeal  to  the  Roman  Caesar,  an 
Egyptian  Pharaoh,  a  Philistian  Abimelech,  an  Assyrian 
Nebuchadnezzar,  the  great  Mogul,  Prester  John,  the  great 
Turk,  or  an  Indian  Sachemr"    ( Ibid.  p.  130.  )    The  expan- 


ROGER  WILLIAMS  115 

sion  of  the  geographical  horizon  has  perhaps  influenced  the 
conception  of  this  idea;  the  public  inclusion  of  non-Chris- 
tian powers  in  the  play  of  politics,  and  the  requirement  of  a 
pacific  English-colonial  penetration  made  possible  later  on 
to  draw  from  it  its  "Legitimierung."  With  it  colonial 
politics  could  throw  many  an  ideological  ballast  overboard. 

As  a  natural  structure,  the  state  stands  also  beyond  good 
and  evil.  It  can  do  e.vil  in  order  to  prevent  greater  evils, 
"as  for  instance,  in  the  civil  state,  usuary,  for  the  prevent- 
ing of  a  greater  evil  in  the  civil  body,  as  stealing,  robbing, 
murdering,  perishing  of  the  poor,  and  the  hindrance,  or 
stop,  of  commerce  and  dealings  in  the  Commonwealth." 
(Bloudy  Tenentyp.  139.) 

The  questions  of  conscience  are  generally  separated  from 
the  social  life  in  a  moral  sense.  The  people  have  indeed  no 
longer  any  relation  in  and  to  the  state  as  religious  beings; 
their  action  in  the  civil  state  is  also  no  longer  a  question  of 
spiritual  judgment  of  conscience.  Therefore  the  social  ac- 
tion may  not  be  involved  in  the  sphere  of  those  actions 
which  flow  out  of  human  conscience.  As  soon  as  the  state 
appears  in  religious  drapery,  then  either  one  must  subscribe 
to  the  state  unfailingly,  "or  else  there  are  no  lawful  king- 
doms, cities,  or  towns  in  the  world,  in  which  a  man  may 
live,  and  unto  whose  civil  government  he  may  submit; 
and  then,  as  I  said  before,  there  must  be  no  world,  nor  is 
it  lawful  to  live  in  it,  because  it  hath  not  a  true  discern- 
ing spirit  to  judge  them  that  fear  or  not  fear  God."  (Ibid. 
p.  1  84. )  From  it  results  the  penetrating  power  of  the  civil 
order,  so  that  all  scruples  of  conscience  are  taken  over  by 
it  from  the  subjects  of  the  state. 

However,  Williams  also  eliminates  the  question  of  con- 
science in  another  sense:  in  social  life  there  dare  be  no  pos- 
sibility of  appealing  upon  restraint  of  conscience  as  the  basis 
for  disobeying  any  civil  laws;  in  the  state  those  actions  will 
be  punished,  which  result  from  the  impulse  of  conscience, 
if  they  affect  the  civil  peace  and  order.  ( Bloody  Tenent 
Yet  More  Bloody ',  p.  88.)  Williams  could  say  with  Selden, 


116  RHODE    ISLAND    HISTORICAL    SOCIETY 

(Transl.  Note:  Selden,  John,  (  1584-1654)  Puritan,  mem- 
ber of  Parliament,  jurist  and  publicist)  man  may  not  be 
permitted  "to  pretend  conscience  against  law."  Because 
Society  is  changed  by  spiritual  crises  of  liberated  relation- 
ships an  externally  regulated  "Komplex"  —  "Soulless," 
"Conscienceless"  —  for  that  reason  the  development  of 
liberty  of  conscience  into  common  Rights  of  Man  has 
hitherto  been  frustrated.  However,  the  theory  of  the  Rights 
of  Man  proceeds  on  the  basis  of  the  acknowledgment  of  a 
"social  conscience."  Of  it  Williams  like  Selden  feared  that 
the  revolt  against  all  social  order  would  borrow  thereby  a 
protecting-shield.  In  opposition  to  the  conscience  of  the 
individual,  he  postulates  a  higher  right,  "The  Conscience 
of  the  State":  "The  conscience  of  the  magistrate  must 
incite  him  to  civil  punishment,  as  a  Lord  Mayor  of  London 
once  answered,  that  he  was  born  to  be  a  judge  when  a  thief 
pleaded  that  he  was  born  to  be  a  thief."    ( Ibid.  p.  143. ) 

The  position  of  Williams  on  the  question  of  the  perse- 
cuting state  seems  at  first  glance  a  wavering  one.  On  the 
one  hand,  there  is  held  forth  the  idea  of  absolute  subjection. 
The  persecuting  state  exists  as  a  civil  state  in  its  unshaken 
right  whenever  it  deals  with  civil  and  social  matters.  Perse- 
cution is  only  to  be  kept  off  from  interference  with  the  soul 
(Bloudy  Tenent,p.  304.)  (Transl.  Note:  Williams  made 
this  distinction:  to  punish  for  religious  opinions  is  persecu- 
tion; but  the  civil  state  may  punish  for  civil  offences  which 
he  calls  prosecution. )  On  the  other  hand,  persecution 
appears  as  much  the  dissolving  factor  of  social  relations  as 
the  enemy  of  society,  so  that  this  right  to  take  steps  for  its 
own  preservation  should  not  be  granted  to  society.  Thus 
Williams  justifies  the  English  Revolution  as  a  rebellion 
against  persecution.  Indeed,  at  the  very  outset  Williams 
takes  up  the  right  of  the  "civil  magistrate"  to  execute  ven- 
geance on  tyranny.  (  Queries  of  Highest  Consideration, 
p.  26.)  The  same  "civil  magistrate"  who  under  circum- 
stances is  able  to  be  the  revolutionary  "magistrate"  of  rank, 
has  the  right  to  draw  the  sword  against  the  persecutor.  (  The 


ROGER  WILLIAMS  117 

Bloody  Tenent  Yet  More  Bloody,  pp.  1 95,  204,  320.)  "All 
persecutors  of  all  sorts  ought  by  the  civil  sword  to  be  re- 
strainted  and  punished  as  the  destroyers  of  mankind  and 
all  civil  and  peaceable  beings  in  the  world  according  to  the 
light  of  their  cruel  and  murderous  oppressions."  {Ibid.  p. 
481.)    So  in  this  also  quietistic  resignation  is  condemned. 

Through  the  separation  of  the   church  from  the  civil 
state,  Williams  hopes  to  arrive  at  an  emphasis  of  the  proper 
civil  functions,  and,  as  it  were,  to  direct  for  its  social  pur- 
pose the  surplus  power  which  becomes  free  for  the  state 
through  the  abandonment  of  its  religious  duties.    Cotton 
had  taken  the  matters  of  dispute  between  members  of  the 
family  and  masters  and  servants  away  from  the  judgment 
and  sentence  of  the  state:  and  the  existing  patriarchal  order 
of  society  placed,  in  fact,  even  the  workingman  under  the 
family-discipline  and  family-right.    The  withdrawing  of 
authority  to  judge  over  disputes  within  the  family  had  to 
receive  a  tremendously  significant  place  in  the  regulation 
of  the  state  in  the  social  development.   And  Williams  re- 
proaches Cotton:  "I  observe,  furthermore,  how  they  (the 
doctrines  of  Cotton)  take  away  from  the  magistrate  that 
which  is  his  proper  cognizance,  as  the  complaints  of  serv- 
ants, children,  wives,  against  their  parents,  masters,  hus- 
bands, etc.   Families  as  families,  being  as  stones  which  make 
up  the  common  building,  and  are  properly  the  object  of 
the  magistrate's  care  in  respect  of  civil  government,  civil 
order,  and  obedience."    (Bloudy  Tenent,  p.    134.)     "To 
whom  should  the  servant  or  child  or  wife  petition  or  com- 
plain against  oppression  unless  to  the  public  father,  master 
and  husband  of  the  Commonweal."    (Bloody  Tenent  Yet 
More  Bloody,  p.  284.)    In  this  the  civil  order  of  Williams 
is  more  nearly  like  a  patriarchal  civil-being,  than  the  civil 
"laisser  faire,  laisser  aller"  of  the  Rights  of  Man.    Cotton 
mentions  in  addition  to  the  "Komprehension"  within  the 
church,  also  a  word  for  the  toleration  of  lesser  evils  within 
the  state.    Williams  excludes  toleration  in  the  latter  as 
well  as  in  the  former.   {Ibid.  pp.  108,  138. )   His  civil  state 


118  RHODK    ISLAM)    HISTORICAL    SOlTKTY 

plunges — freed  from  impeding  admixtures — with  unceas- 
ing aggression  into  its  duties  and  labors.  Williams  com- 
plains vigorously  that  the  "Model  of  Church  and  Civil 
Power"  which  the  New  England  churches  worked  out, 
even  in  the  spirit  of  confining  civil  authority,  prohibits  the 
civil  state  from  punishing  expressed  evils:  "so  they  take 
away  and  disrobe  him  of  that  authority,  which  God  has 
clothed  him  with."  {Ibid.  p.  284.  At  the  same  time  he 
refers  to  the  indications  of  prosperity  which  the  economic 
life  of  the  nations  experiences  because  of  toleration.  Wil- 
liams repeatedly  applies  the  example  of  Holland  to  this 
thesis:  the  weakening  of  the  economic  power  of  countries  is 
emphasized  by  their  persecutions. ) 

"Heathen"  states  are  not  only  legitimate  and  lawful,  but 
their  civil  efficacy,  the  success  of  their  commonweales, 
suffers  no  diminution  through  the  heathen  nature.  The 
Christian  religion  can  not  claim  any  right  over  the  well- 
being  of  the  commonweale:  according  to  the  nature  of  re- 
ligion any  influence  upon  the  affairs  of  Nature  is  forbidden 
her.  States  with  corrupt  religions  enjoy  prosperity  and 
well-being.  Williams  declares  that  he  could  not  well  be- 
lieve it  when  Cotton  says,  "that  outward  civil  peace  cannot 
stand  where  religion  is  corrupt.  When  so  many  stately 
kingdoms  and  governments  in  the  world  have  long  and 
long  enjoyed  civil  peace  and  quiet,  notwithstanding  that 
religion  is  so  corrupt,  as  that  there  is  not  the  very  name  of 
Jesus  Christ  among  them."  (Bloudy  Tenenty  p.  216.)  It 
were  an  exceedingly  dangerous  opinion,  namely,  that  the 
social  and  spiritual  beings,  the  state  and  the  church,  "are 
like  Hypocrates  twins,  they  are  born  together,  grow  up  to- 
gether, laugh  together,  weep  together,  sicken  and  die 
together."    (Ibid.  p.  286.) 

The  intrinsic  justification  which  Williams  in  all  these 
ways  allows  to  be  assigned  to  the  civil  and  social  life,  he  also 
extends  to  the  "particularity"  and  "self-hood"  of  the  civil 
world.  He  affirms  the  latter  in  the  fulness  of  its  forms  and 
meanings,  and   fights  angrily  against  Cotton  who  might 


ROGER  WILLIAMS  119 

thereby  squeeze  all  civil  matters  into  one  scheme  since  he 
(Cotton)  declares  the  essences  of  the  Mosaic  order  of  so- 
ciety as  eternal  and  unchangeable.  Williams  acknowledges 
instead  of  a  free  historical  movement,  the  historical  evolu- 
tion of  the  civil  world.  The  order  of  nature  is  unchangeable 
throughout  all  time:  "Civil  alters  according  to  the  consti- 
tutions of  peoples  and  nations."  (  Bloody  Tenent  Yet  More 
Bloody,  p.  80.)  Indeed,  certain  moral  principles  in  the 
laws  of  Moses  are  eternal ;  but  only  in  the  substance,  not 
in  the  material  circumstances.  Whatever  remains  in  them 
that  is  timeless  must  also  work  itself  out  "according  to 
the  nature  and  constitutions  of  the  several  nations  and 
peoples  of  the  world."  {Ibid.  p.  485.)  Williams  fights 
through  with  Cotton  particularly  this  question  about  the 
problem  of  the  punishment  for  adultery  which  Cotton 
wishes  to  adapt  to  Mosaic  law:  for  it  Christ  has  established 
no  fixed  punishment,  but  "leaves  the  several  nations  of  the 
world  to  their  own  several  laws  and  agreements,  .  .  . 
according  to  their  several  natures,  dispositions,  and  their 
common  peace  and  welfare."  ( Ibid.  p.  487. )  Thus  Christ 
approved  "the  several  human  ordinances  or  creations." 
( Ibid.  p.  48  8. )  Cotton's  intolerance  must  deny  the  legality 
of  the  several  and  heterogeneous  governments  and  forms  of 
government,  and  force  them  all  "to  one  common  law." 
{Ibid.  p.  488. )  One  dare  not,  however,  overrate  the  inner 
affirmation  of  the  different  nature  of  the  world  in  space  and 
time.  Plainly  it  is  the  historical  change  which  Williams 
calls  forth  to  draw  on  the  eternal  and  timeless  lawful  re- 
ligion from  its  influence  over  the  changeable  state.  He  em- 
phasizes the  historical  change  so  much  in  order  to  be  able 
to  defend  the  religious  matter  before  them,  and  affirms  it 
in  favor  of  the  civil-social  sphere,  because  he  has  withdrawn 
religion  out  of  this  sphere.  Like  many  other  theorists  of 
tolerance,  he  enters  into  the  revolutionary  change  of  re- 
ligious opinions  of  the  English  nation,  how  they  changed 
with  their  sovereigns  from  Roman  Catholic  to  Anglican, 
from  Anglican  to  Protestant,  and  so  forth,  "as  the  longest 


120  RHODE    ISLAND    HISTORICAL    SOCIETY 

sword  and  strongest  arm  of  flesh  carries  it."  {Letters, 
p.  219.  "Letter  to  Endicott.")  "The  fathers  have  made 
their  sons  heretics,  and  the  sons  their  fathers."  (  Queries  of 
Highest  Consideration,  p.  20. )  The  historical  change  is  to 
Williams,  indeed,  very  frequently  an  indication  of  the 
transitoriness  of  the  creature:  "Vain  uncertain  and  change- 
able mutations  of  the  present  evil  world."  {Queries  of 
Highest  Consideration,  p.  20.)  "Certain  uncertainties  of 
friends,  treasures,  revenues,  armies,  forts,  magazines, 
castles,  ships,  and  navies,  crowns  and  lives."  {Bloody 
Tenent  Yet  More  Bloody,  p.  16.)  This  charge  plainly 
makes  the  civil  world  of  inferior  merit  and  dignity.  With 
this  corresponds  also  Williams'  view  of  history:  prevail- 
ing, undeceived  princes  (  Karl  V ;  Philip  II )  and  the  decep- 
tion of  the  English  nation  by  the  usurper  Warbeck:  transi- 
toriness and  deception  of  earthly  beings. 

The  affirmation  of  the  individual  rights  of  states  is  so 
frequently  united  by  Williams  to  the  discussion  of  the  right 
of  resistance  against  heretical  princes.  Intolerance  seems 
to  him  to  embrace  in  itself  the  doctrine  of  the  dethronement 
of  heretical  princes.  He  who  objects  to  the  social  right  of 
existence  of  the  subjects  because  of  a  religious  disqualifica- 
tion, will  also  not  permit  the  heretical  princes  to  have 
authority  in  his  civil  life.  He  who  believes  in  his  duty  to 
have  to  eradicate  the  heretic  from  the  face  of  the  earth, 
will  also  not  make  a  stop  before  heretical  princes:  "such 
kings  and  magistrates  ought  as  well  as  thousands  of  his 
subjects  in  like  case  to  be  put  to  death."  {Bloody  Tenent 
Yet  More  Bloody,  p.  420.  Likewise,  Ibid.  pp.  86,  205.) 
"All  persecutors  hold  the  Pope's  traiterous  doctrine  of 
deposing  heretical  princes."  {Ibid.  p.  302.)  Persecution  is 
synonymous  with  the  "Popish  bloody  doctrine  of  depos- 
ing heretical  kings."  {Ibid.  p.  28  1. )  It  is  the  "Theory  of 
the  Powder  Plot."    ( Ibid.  p.  497. ) 

Under  such  presentations,  Williams  therefore  has  cer- 
tain difficulties  about  the  toleration  of  the  Catholics,  whose 
Popes  explicitly  defended  and  practised  this  right.  ( Against 


ROGER  WTLLIAMS  121 

it,  the  toleration  of  the  Jews  is  urged  with  unreserved 
energy. )  The  Catholic  religion  seemed,  nevertheless,  so 
loaded  with  doctrines  hostile  to  civility  that  in  Williams' 
time  very  few  had  ventured  to  speak  of  tolerating  Catho- 
lics. In  favor  of  it,  Williams  goes  about  to  explain  that 
doctrine  about  the  deposing  of  heretical  princes  as  alien 
to  the  true  basic  dogma  of  the  Catholics.  The  Catholics 
had  given  proof  of  their  loyalty  in  many  Protestant  coun- 
tries 3  many  in  England  had  taken  the  Oath  of  allegiance. 
One  entire  Catholic  kingdom  ( France )  had  spoken  out 
in  1610  against  the  disloyal  book  of  the  Jesuit  Mariana 
and  thereby  shown  how  even  the  Catholic  religion  can  be 
reconciled  with  civil  matters,  and  how  unjust  Cotton  is  "to 
chain  up  all  Papists  in  an  impossibility  of  yielding  civil  obe- 
dience." {Bloody  Tenent  Yet  More  Bloody ,  p.  31 1. )  Wil- 
liams however  held  the  toleration  of  Catholics  to  fixed 
stipulations":  the  state  may  require  them  to  take  the  Oath 
of  civil  engagement  and  to  yield  up  their  arms,  and  the 
state  may  also  mark  them  "as  the  Jews  are  in  some  parts 
by  some  distinction  of  or  on  their  garments."  {Ibid.  p.  314. ) 
That  it  was  possible  for  Williams,  from  his  broadly 
laid-out  rejection  of  the  deposing  of  heretical  princes  to 
infer  a  reciprocal  duty  of  the  princes  and  to  guard  the 
civil-social  rights  of  his  heretical  subjects,  is  due  to  the 
peculiar  social-civil  conception  of  Williams.  This  con- 
ception rests  in  the  identity  of  the  civil  and  social  rights 
and  relations.  The  state  leads  no  independent  life  without 
society  and,  that  which  makes  it  lawful,  makes  legitimate 
also  the  whole  body  of  social  relationships,  and  to  dispute 
its  self-designed  immanent  legitimacy  signifies  an  abolition 
and  a  negation  of  all  social  relations.  One  may  compare, 
for  example,  the  following  utterance  of  Williams:  "And 
hence  it  is  true,  that  a  Christian  captain,  Christian  mer- 
chant, physician,  lawyer,  pilot,  father,  master,  and  so  con- 
sequently magistrate,  etc.,  is  no  more  a  captain,  merchant, 
physician,  lawyer,  pilot,  father,  master,  magistrate,  etc., 
than  a  captain,  merchant,  etc.,  of  any  other  conscience  or 


122  RHODE  ISLAND  HISTORICAL  SOCIETY 

religion."  (Bloudy  Tenerit,  p.  341.)  The  state  appears 
here  as  the  product  of  the  social  division  of  labor:  the 
essence  of  the  state  resting  entirely  on  the  existence  of  a 
portion  of  the  governing  classes.  This  portion  has  an 
occupation  among  other  occupations,  as  a  special  social 
group  among  other  groups.  The  civil  being  is  also  dissolved 
into  the  social  being.  One  can  also  say  Williams  robs,  as 
it  were,  the  state  of  its  public  nature,  in  that,  he  identifies  it 
with  the  remaining  social  relations  and  constituents.  The 
legitimacy  of  the  state  becomes  the  legitimacy  of  a  social 
vocational-group j  its  immanent  "legitimacy"  differs  not  at 
all  in  principle  from  the  "authorization"  of  the  business  of 
a  merchant  and  the  legality  of  a  mercantile  business. 
( Transl.  Note:  See  Ernst:  Roger  Williams,  Part  III, 
Chapt.  12.  The  state  is  a  public  service  corporation.  See 
also,  The  Political  Thought  of  Roger  Williams.)  A 
"Christian"  state  would  in  the  conception  of  Williams  pre- 
suppose a  "Christian"  banking  business,  a  "Christian" 
fishery,  a  "Christian"  medical  science,  and  so  forth.  Thus 
Williams  is  able  to  defend  the  biblical  phrase  to  give  Caesar 
what  is  Caesar's  into  making  legitimate  the  "Totalitat"  of 
social  relationships  and  to  place  the  affirmation  of  the  state 
beyond  all  religious  presumptions  on  a  parity  with  the 
claims  of  all  citizens,  like  that  religious  qualification,  on  all 
social  right  to  property  and  life.  "Although  that  a  man  is 
not  godly,  a  Christian,  sincere,  a  church  member,  yet  to 
deprive  him  of  any  civil  right  or  privilege  due  to  him  as  a 
Man,  a  Subject,  a  Citizen,  is  to  take  from  Caesar  that  which 
is  Caesar's,  which  God  endures  not  though  it  be  given  to 
himself."  {Bloody  T enent  Yet  More  Bloody,  p.  414.) 
Thus  whilst  Williams  deprives  religion  of  any  connection 
with  the  state,  he  also  disestablishes  the  state. 

As  Williams  has  justified  the  non-religious  state  as  a 
civil  state  in  the  fulness  of  its  essence  and  being,  he  in  addi- 
tion proceeds  to  defend  on  the  basis  of  this  legitimacy  the 
full -rights  of  non-religious  citizens  as  unassailable.  Just 
as  each  state  is  "complete"  as  a  state  beyond  its  religious 


ROGER  WILLIAMS  123 

creeds,  so  is  also  each  citizen  as  a  citizen.  The  social  func- 
tions of  the  subject  are  not  able,  because  of  his  religious 
creed,  to  possess  the  least  enhancement,  improvement, 
influence,  not  even  a  coloring  or  a  toning  down.  "And  I 
ask  whether  or  not  such  as  hold  forth  other  worships  or 
religions  Jews,  Turks,  or  anti-Christians,  may  not  be  peace- 
able and  quiet  subjects,  loving  and  helpful  neighbors, 
fair  and  just  dealers,  true  and  loyal  to  the  civil  govern- 
ment." (  Bloudy  Tenertt,  p.  112.)  The  society  moves  by  its 
own  impulsive  power.  Social  and  religious  morals  are  two 
different  forces.  The  social  moral  is  something  natural,  and 
grows  inevitably  out  of  the  social,  immanent  and  natural 
necessities.  There  is  a  social  moral  which  needs  no  religi- 
ous impulse:  "There  is  a  moral  virtue,  a  moral  fidelity  and 
honesty,  which  other  men  besides  churchmembers  are  by 
good  nature  and  education,  by  good  laws  and  good 
examples  nourished  and  trained  up  in."  ( Bloody  Tenent 
Yet  More  Bloody ,  p.  365. )  There  is  a  "civil  faithfulness, 
obedience,  honesty,  chastity."  {Ibid.  p.  207.)  These 
differentiate  themselves  naturally  from  religious  obedi- 
ence, religious  faithfulness  and  religious  virtue.  It  is 
dangerous  "to  confound  the  nature  of  civil  and  moral 
goodness  with  religious."  ( Ibid.  p.  406. )  On  that  account 
it  is  an  error  to  assume  that  "religious"  sins  are  able  to 
menace  the  civil  state.  Individual  sins  indeed  may  affect 
and  trouble  the  social  life.  "But  blindness  of  the  soul, 
hardening  of  the  heart,  the  inclination  to  choose  this  or 
that  God,  this  or  that  Christ  besides  the  true  one,  these 
injure  not  even  remotely  the  commonwealth,  since  they 
do  not  affect  it,  but  only  the  spiritual  kingdom."  {Bloudy 
Tenent,  p.  328.)  Even  persons  without  any  religion 
can  be  put  into  possession  of  that  social  morality,  which 
makes  them  suitable  members  of  society. 

Thus  the  social  being  experiences  no  suggestion  or 
pressure  because  of  religious  powers.  Neither  the  society 
as  a  whole  nor  the  individual  social  trade  groups  suffer 
a  declension  through  the  religious  changes.    "Yea,  though 


124  RHODE  ISLAND  HISTORICAL  SOCIETY 

the  whole  worship  of  the  city  of  Ephesus  should  be  altered, 
yet  if  men  be  true  and  honestly  ingenuous  the  city  cove- 
nants, combinations  and  principles,  all  this  might  be  with- 
out the  least  impeachment  or  infringement  of  the  peace 
of  the  city  of  Ephesus."  (Bloudy  Tenent,  p.  47.)  The 
change  in  religion  becomes  the  more  significant,  if  within 
the  society  there  is  established  a  religious  congregation 
which  represents  itself  as  a  process  of  continual  organ- 
izing and  dissolving  of  the  religious  union  in  which  persons 
assemble  spontaneously  to  disunite  and  again  break  up 
when  its  purpose  is  accomplished.  Such  a  voluntary  union 
is  the  religious  congregation,  in  fact  one  of  the  "companies 
and  societies  voluntarily  entering  into  combinations  which 
are  distinct  from  the  city."  {Bloody  Tenent  Yet  More 
Bloody >  p.  69.)  No  political  and  social  theorist,  not  even 
Locke,  (Locke,  John,  (1632-1704)  Toleration,  (1685), 
and  Two  Treatises  of  Government.  (  1690  )  has  so  ruggedly 
worked  out  the  idea  that  the  church  is  an  "association,"  a 
corporation  with  private  rights:  "The  church,  or  company 
of  worshippers,  whether  true  or  false,  is  like  unto  a  body  or 
college  of  physicians  in  a  city — like  unto  a  corporation,  so- 
ciety, or  company  of  East  India  or  Turkey  merchants,  or  any 
other  society  or  company  of  London ;  which  companies 
may  hold  their  courts,  keep  their  records,  hold  disputations, 
and  in  matters  concerning  their  society  may  dissent,  divide, 
break  into  schisms  and  factions,  sue  and  implead  each 
other  at  the  Jaw,  yea,  wholly  break  up  and  dissolve  into 
pieces  and  nothing,  and  yet  the  peace  of  the  city  not  be 
in  the  least  measure  impaired  or  disturbed;  because  the 
essence  of  the  city,  and  so  the  well-being  and  peace  thereof, 
is  essentially  distinct  from  those  particular  societies;  the 
city  courts,  city  laws,  city  punishments  distinct  from  them. 
The  city  was  before  them,  and  stands  absolute  and  entire 
when  such  a  corporation  or  society  is  taken  down."  (  Bloudy 
Tenent ,  p.  46. ) 

Christianity  and  religion  have  lost  entirely  their  social 
effectiveness.    Religion  has  nowhere  become  flesh,  and  has 


ROGER  WILLIAMS  125 

nowhere  assumed  a  characteristic  form.  Christianity  is 
without  any  formative  power  for  the  things  of  this  earth. 
There  are  no  "Christian  states";  there  is  no  "Christian 
world."  Christianity,  as  Williams  conceives  it,  loses  its 
outward  form  and  its  visibility.  It  would  be  deprived  of 
its  original  essence,  if  it  entered  into  a  combination  with 
the  things  of  this  world.  It  is  not  able  to  impress  its 
stamp  on  the  earthly  things,  and  there  are  in  this  world 
no  longer  any  sacred  things.  The  idea  which  we  have  so 
frequently  come  upon,  that  Christ  removed  the  distinction 
between  holy  and  unholy,  pure  and  impure,  Williams 
modifies  in  many  different  ways.  Upon  this  earth  no  longer 
lies  the  shadow  of  Holiness;  the  holy  nowhere  any  longer 
becomes  characteristic  form.  Williams  falls  upon  this 
idea  in  order  particularly  to  destroy  essentially  the  supe- 
riority of  the  Christian  world  over  the  non-Christian.  The 
nations  are-all  alike  pure  and  impure.  None  can  thereby 
exalt  itself  above  the  others,  in  that  it  boasts  of  its  religi- 
ous perfection,  and  because  it  claims  for  itself  a  peculiar 
Holiness.  All  nations  stand  equal  before  God.  Since  the 
New  Testament  times  there  is  no  longer  any  "holy  nation": 
the  Israel  of  the  Old  Testament  was  a  prototype  of  the 
holy  nation  of  Christ,  which  is  chosen  out  of  the  few  Elect 
whom  Christ  has  called  out  of  the  nations  of  the  earth. 
No  nation  is  called  unanimously.  Even  the  "Christian" 
nations  are  equal  to  the  others  before  God.  Williams  offers 
vehement  objections  against  "this  sanctifying  of  a  new  land 
of  Canaan."  (Queries  of  Highest  Consideration,  p.  19.) 
"Are  not  all  the  nations  of  the  earth  alike  clean  unto  God? 
Or  rather,  alike  unclean  until  it  pleaseth  the  Father  of 
mercies  to  call  some  out  to  the  knowledge  and  grace  of 
his  Son,  making  them  to  wash  in  the  blood  of  the  Lamb  of 
God?"  (Bloudy  Tenent,  p.  281.)  "But  now  the  partition- 
wall  is  broken  down,  and  in  respect  of  the  Lord's  special 
propriety  to  one  country  more  than  another,  what  differ- 
ence between  Asia  and  Africa,  between  Europe  and 
America,  between  England  and  Turkey,  London  and  Con- 


lid  RHODE  ISLAND  HISTORICAL  SOCIETY 

stantinople?"  {Ibid.  p.  275.)  For  Williams  also  made 
war  on  the  colonial  policy  of  annexation  by  force  which 
makes  an  appeal  to  the  inner  spiritual  "religious"  pre- 
eminence of  Christian  nations.  Out  of  this  sanctification 
and  religious  glorification  of  Christian  nations  follows  "the 
sin  of  the  patents,  wherein  Christian  kings,  so-called-(  !  ) 
are  invested  with  the  right  by  virtue  of  their  Christianity 
to  take  away  and  give  away  the  lands  and  countries  of 
other  men,"  who  are  not  Christian.  (  Bloody  Tenent  Yet 
More  Bloody,  p.  461.)  In  a  more  interesting  way  this 
interpretation  provides  Williams  also  with  a  means  to 
rebuke  the  overbearing  manner  of  the  colonies  towards 
Mother  England.  In  Cotton's  mind  there  had  arisen  on 
American  soil  a  land  of  God  and  a  kingdom  of  Christ, 
which  was  exalted  spiritually  far  above  religious-corrupt 
England.  Against  this  notion,  Williams  says:  "I  for  my- 
self acknowledge  the  land  of  England  not  to  be  inferior 
to  any  under  heaven."  {Bloudy  Tenent,p.  4-07.)  Through 
this  denial  of  the  spiritual  superiority  of  New  England, 
he  hopes  also  to  be  able  to  break  the  persecution  of  New 
England,  "stopping  New  England's  persecutions  by  the 
mercy  of  Old  England,  the  mother  of  dissenting  con- 
sciences."   (Bloody  Tenent  Yet  More  Bloody,  p.  463.) 

Christianity,  as  Williams  understands  it,  ceases  there- 
fore to  compromise  with  the  Forms  of  this  earth,  because 
it  itself  remains  with  fixed  Form  as  a  permanent  Pattern. 
Every  established  pattern  in  religious  things  signifies  for 
our  logician,  —  to  neglect  religion  and  the  godly  matters 
with  a  "Kreatural  Bildhaftigkeit,"  to  run  counter  to  the 
command  of  God  not  to  make  an  image  of  Him.  This 
begins  even  with  the  earliest  religious  experience  of  the 
individual.  Even  here  Williams  struggles  against  a  fixed, 
bound  and  rigid  pattern.  The  religious  belief  ought  to  be 
a  constant  spiritual  struggle,  a  continual  flowing,  becoming 
and  bubbling  of  the  spirit.  (Naturally  it  ought  not  be 
denied  that,  with  the  belief  in  predestination,  in  Williams 
who  accepted  the  belief  of  individual  "Election,"  that  is, 


ROGER  WILLIAMS 


127 


security  and  irrevocability,  there  are  also  other  heterogene- 
ous motives  operative. )  Perseverance  in  the  once  attained 
Truth,  lethargy  in  religious  truth,  is  sinful  confidence  in 
natural  insight.  The  belief  in  the  insecurity  of  human 
knowledge  could  become  a  natural  motive  in  favor  of 
tolerance.  In  fact,  Williams  constructs  in  part  his  ideas 
of  tolerance  upon  the  insecurity  of  human  knowledge ; 
(Transl.  Note:  Williams  was  closely  associated  with  the 
scientific  movement  of  the  seventeenth  century,  and  so 
emphasized  experience,  experiment  and  inquiry  in  life  and 
thought.)  No  one  can  know  whether  he  follow  in  a  heresy 
and  not  the  Lord:  "It  is  a  dangerous  thing  to  put  this  to 
the  may-be,  to  the  venture  or  hazard,  to  the  possibility." 
{Letters,  "To  Endicott,"  August  1651,  p.  225.)  "May 
not  the  most  High  be  pleased  to  hide  from  his  (the  perse- 
cutor's) as  well  as  from  the  eyes  of  his  fellow  servants, 
fellow  mankind,  fellow  English:  And  if  God  hide  from 
his,  from  any,  who  can  discover? "  ( Ibid.  p.  2 1 6. )  It  was  a 
"holy  purpose"  of  God  to  permit  all  the  duplicity  of 
religious  knowledge  in  which  the  individual,  thrown  about 
erring  and  reeling,  is  placed,  "as  it  displays  Himself  only 
perfect  and  excellent  and  all  the  rest  of  men  in  all  ages 
but  farthing  candles,  yea,  smoking  firebrands."  {Bloody 
Tenent  Yet  More  Bloody ',  p.  39.)  Thus  are  the  people: 
"poor  dust  and  ashes,  like  stones  once  rolling  down  the 
Alps,  like  Indian  canoes  or  English  boats  loose  and  adrift, 
where  stop  we  until  infinite  mercy  stop  us,  especially, 
when  a  false  fire  of  zeal  and  confidence  drives  us." 
{Letters,  "To  Endicott,"  p.  226. ) 

Neither  does  Williams  hold  to  the  belief  in  a  true 
church  now  existing  in  the  world.  Nor  does  religious 
essence  here  take  on  form;  nor  ought  it  here  become  an 
earthly  image.  The  children  of  God  are  obscured,  and 
divided  in  opinions.  They  are  not  able  to  be  reconciled 
since  they  live  entirely  ignorant  of  themselves  and  the 
world.  "The  rich  mines  of  golden  truth  lie  hid  under 
barren  hills,  and  in  obscure  holes  and  corners."  {Bloudy 


128  RHODE  ISLAND  HISTORICAL  SOCIETY 

Tenent,  p.  150.)  Thousand  of  God's  Elect  live  in  the 
national,  diocesan  and  parish  churches  and  go  about  among 
the  mass  of  "Idolaters."  "God's  people  in  their  persons  are 
His,  most  dear  and  precious,  yet  in  respect  of  the  Christian 
worship,  they  are  mingled  amongst  the  Babylonians." 
(Ibid.  p.  40. )  They  are  nearest  to  God,  "that  separate 
both  from  one  and  the  other,  yet  are  divided  also  among 
themselves  into  several  professions."  (Ibid.  p.  302. )  "But 
as  the  lily  is  among  the  thorns,  so  is  Christ's  love  among  the 
daughters j  and  as  the  apple-tree  among  the  trees  of  the 
forest,  so  is  her  beloved  among  the  sons."  {Ibid.  p.  65. ) 
"What  are  two  or  three  or  more  of  regenerate  or  godly 
persons  in  such  communions,  but  as  two  or  three  roses  or 
lilies  in  a  wilderness?  A  few  grains  of  good  corn  in  a  heap 
of  chaff  :  A  few  sheep  among  herds  of  wolves  or  swine, 
or  (if  more  civil)  flocks  of  goats:  A  little  good  dough 
swallowed  up  with  a  whole  bushel  of  leaven:  Or  a  little 
precious  gold  confounded  and  mingled  with  a  whole  heap 
of  dross:"    (Ibid.  p.  421.) 

The  religious  opinion  of  Williams  is  therefore  repre- 
sented variously  as  a  religion  of  escape — as  an  escape  from 
the  business  and  evil  ways  of  the  world.  The  flower  of  re- 
ligion blossoms  in  hidden  places,  and  the  church — Williams 
returns  frequently  to  this  comparison  —  is  like  an  enclosed 
and  hedged  in  garden  into  which  penetrates  no  "breath 
from  the  agitated  world."  Separation  from  the  world,  iso- 
lation, is  the  mark  of  the  religious  adjustment  of  Williams. 
"A  false  religion  out  of  the  church  will  not  hurt  the  church, 
no  more  than  weeds  in  a  wilderness  hurt  the  enclosed 
garden  or  poison  hurts  the  body  when  it  is  not  touched 
or  taken,  yea,  and  antidotes  are  received  against  it."  ( Ibid. 
p.  167.)  "If  the  weeds  be  kept  out  of  the  garden  of  the 
church,  the  roses  and  lilies  therein  will  nourish,  notwith- 
standing, that  weeds  abound  in  the  held  of  the  civil  state." 
(Ibid.  p.  156.)  He  charges  the  adherents  of  the  state- 
church,  that  they  wish  to  make  the  garden  and  the  wilder- 


ROGER  WILLIAMS 


129 


ness  a  unity.  {Ibid.  p.  170.)  Cotton  wishes  to  make  the 
dung-heaps  of  the  world  the  blossoming  gardens  of  Christ. 
In  all  this  sticks  at  bottom  a  goodly  piece  of  hardheaded 
religious  egoism.  Without  the  weeds  may  nourish,  if  only 
in  my  garden  the  roses  blossom;  and  without  the  storm 
may  howl  and  the  ships  be  shattered  to  pieces,  if  only  my 
ships  lie  safely  at  anchor.  Williams  is  filled  with  the  fear 
that  the  purity  of  his  soul  and  his  religion  might  suffer 
alarm  and  dangers  of  the  world;  but  the  world  may  be 
destroyed  if  only  my  soul  suffers  no  harm!  He  speaks  of 
"the  lamentable  ship-wreck  of  mankind"  ( Bloudy  Tenent, 
p.  3  )  from  which  it  is  worthwhile  to  save  oneself.  He  longs 
to  be  of  the  true  church:  "also  separated  from  the  rubbish 
of  anti-Christian  confessions  and  desolations."  (Ibid.  p.  41 . ) 
"Having  bought  truth  dear,  we  must  not  sell  it  cheap,  not 
the  least  grain  of  it,  for  the  whole  world;  no,  not  for  the 
saving  of  souls."    (Ibid.  p.  9.)    He  reminds  Parliament: 

Therein  is  contained  also  the  analysis  of  the  tolerance-scheme  of 
Cotton.  Here  contend  not  merely  tolerance  and  intolerance,  but  also  one 
idea  of  tolerance  with  another.  Within  the  church  (Cotton  admits 
certain  toleration  even  without  the  church  —  even  if  hemmed  in  by 
reservations  and  disqualifications.)  Cotton  desires  to  tolerate  every- 
thing which  is  at  one  with  things  fundamental.  Williams  throws  out 
headlong  the  idea  of  toleration  within  the  church.  Cotton  wishes  to 
transplant  the  stinking  weeds  into  the  garden  of  God.  (Bloody  Tenent 
Yet  More  Bloody,  p.  142.)  "Komprehension"  Williams  holds  is  a  dis- 
grace to  the  church  of  God.  Everything,  even  the  smallest  tares  must  be 
weeded  out  of  the  garden  of  Christ.  Williams  conceives  the  notion  of 
heretics  more  strictly  than  does  Cotton:  the  opposition  to  God  even  in 
the  smallest  matters 'makes  one  an  heretic.  {Ibid.  p.  99.)  The  question 
which  has  been  presented  to  all  plans  of  Comprehension:  Where  is  the 
borderline?  What  belongs  to  fundamental  truths?  is  also  raised  by  Wil- 
liams, {Ibid.  p.  117.)  In  addition  Williams  is  radically  opposed  to  every 
presentation  of  a  Christian  unified-front  which  at  best  brings  such 
plans  to  naught;  his  more  sublime  religious  standpoint  removes  all 
current  Christianity  at  so  great  a  distance  that  the  removal  of  it  from 
non-Christian  religion  diminishes  to  a  vanishing  point.  The  "Christiani 
omnes  sumus"  has  in  him  an  embittered  opponent.  His  tolerance  is  a 
tolerance  of  ultimate  intolerance;  a  tolerance  of  spiritual  abandonment 
and  of  spiritual  resignation  of  "the  world"). 


130  RHODE  ISLAND  HISTORICAL  SOCIETY 

"Be  not  so  busy  about  the  earthly  state,  no  nor  the  heavenly 
estate  of  others,  as  to  forget  to  make  sure  you  own  voca- 
tion and  election."  [Bloody  Tenent  Yet  More  Bloody , 
p.  15.)  We  dare  not  expose  ourselves  to  the  dangers  of 
the  world,  not  even  to  save  a  soul.  Each  for  himself,  and 
God  for  all  of  us.  "Christ  commands  his  disciples  to  let 
the  blind  man  go  until  he  falls  into  the  grave."  [Bloudy 
Tenent,  p.  19. ) 

One  pulse  of  the  heart  is  indistinguishable  from  the 
others.  Williams  is  a  strict  adherent  of  Calvinistic  pre- 
destination, (Transl.  Note:  Freund  fails  to  distinguish 
between  "unconditional"  and  "conditional"  election.  Wil- 
liams held  the  Lutheran  position  of  "conditional  election." 
Or  in  other  words  Williams  took  the  idea  of  "predestina- 
tion" more  nearly  in  the  sense  in  which  Paul  presents  the 
idea  in  the  New  Testament.  See  Ernst:  Roger  Williams, 
Part  IV,  Chapter  2,  "The  Seeker  Religion"),  and  con- 
structs in  part  his  idea  of  tolerance  upon  it.  About  con- 
demnation and  sanctification  God  alone  has  the  determina- 
tion and  him  whom  he  has  chosen  for  eternal  peace,  no 
errors  can  trouble.  (Transl.  Note:  Freund  is  in  error  here, 
for  Williams  admits  that  even  the  elect  are  uncertain  of 
their  election.  See  Ernst:  Roger  Williams,  "The  Seeker 
Religion.")  The  Elect  need  no  protection:  God's  sheep 
are  safe  in  his  eternal  hand.  "Dead  men  cannot  be  infected. 
The  civil  state,  the  world,  being  in  a  natural  state,  dead 
in  sin,  whatever  be  the  state-religion  unto  which  persons 
are  forced,  it  is  impossible  it  should  be  infected.  Indeed, 
the  living,  the  believing,  the  church  and  spiritual  state, 
that  and  that  only  is  capable  of  infection;  for  whose  help 
we  shall  presently  see  what  preservatives  and  remedies 
the  Lord  Jesus  hath  appointed.  Moreover,  as  we  see  in 
a  common  plague  or  infection,  the  names  are  taken,  how 
many  are  to  die,  and  not  one  more  shall  be  struck  than  the 
destroying  angel  hath  names  of:  so  here  whatever  be  the 
soul-infection  breathed  out  from  the  lying  lips  of  a  plague- 
stricken  Pharisee,  yet  the  names  are  taken,  not  one  elect 


ROGER  WILLIAMS  131 

or  chosen  of  God  shall  perish.  God's  sheep  are  safe  in 
his  eternal  hand  and  counsel,  and  he  knows  his  material, 
knows  also  his  mystical  stars,  their  numbers,  and  calls 
them  every  one  by  name.  None  fall  into  the  ditch  on  the 
blind  Pharisee's  back,  but  such  as  were  ordained  to  that 
condemnation,  both  guide  and  followers.  The  vessels  of 
wrath  shall  break  and  split,  and  only  they,  to  the  praise 
of  God's  eternal  justice.  (Bloudy  Tenent,  p.  97.)  "Who 
can  pluck  these  sheep,  "the  elect,  out  of  his  hand."  (Ibid. 
p.  115.)  Intolerance  builds  upon  the  Popish  doctrine  of 
free  will,  as  if  "it  lay  in  their  own  power  and  ability  to 
believe  upon  the  magistrate's  command."    (Ibid.  p.  222.) 

A  religious  positiveness  flows  through  the  entire  think- 
ing of  Williams.  He  does  not  let  the  seducer  of  men  in 
religious  matters  get  away  without  combat,  and  of  a  spirit- 
ual toleration  of  these  whom  he  wrests  away  from  the 
gallows  of  the  state  there  is  no  word:  in  the  state  the  law 
demands — an  eye  for  an  eye,  a  tooth  for  a  tooth,  a  life  for 
a  life;  and  in  the  kingdom  of  the  church  the  law  —  a  soul 
for  a  soul.    (Ibid.  p.  96.) 

At  the  bottom  of  every  religious  theory  of  Williams, 
reposes  the  refusal  of  any  spiritual  conquest  of  the  world. 
This  has  been  denied  because  it  would  presuppose  secular 
"sovereignty."  To  Williams,  moreover,  each  "domina- 
tion" represents  a  menace  to  true  religiousness.  The  divine 
illumination  is  vouchsafed  only  to  the  lower  classes  of 
people,  for  the  most  part  in  their  wholeness  of  religious 
sensibility.  A  profound  spiritual  aversion  of  the  demon  of 
power  and  authority  overcomes  our  thinker,  and  a  vehe- 
ment mistrust  of  the  upper  classes  of  society.  In  the  dedi- 
cation (to  the  Parliament)  of  the  Bloody  Tenent  Yet  More 
Bloody  and  in  a  "Letter  to  Endicott"  (Letters,  p.  214)  he 
speaks  of  a  particular  seduction  for  which  the  rulers  are 
censured.  Their  spiritual  welfare  is  more  powerfully 
exposed  to  danger  than  that  of  all  the  others;  therefore, 
true  Christianity  shines  very  seldom  upon  the  leaders  of 
social  and  civil  life.    To  let  the  rulers  decide  upon  the 


132  RHODE  ISLAND  HISTORICAL  SOCIETY 

religion  of  the  state  signifies  from  thence  always  the  sover- 
eignity of  the  unreligious  persons  over  the  church.  God  is 
"Maximus  in  minimis."  (  Bloudy  Tenent ,  p.  4. )  Even  cul- 
ture and  knowledge  through  which  the  great  world  shines, 
does  not  guarantee  the  religious  truth  which  is  the  grace  and 
gift  of  God.  "God  delights  to  befool  the  wise  and  high." 
(Bloody  Tenent  Yet  More  Bloody,  p.  209.)  "The  Most 
High  and  glorious  God  hath  chosen  the  poor  of  the  world 
and  the  witnesses  of  truth  are  clothed  in  sackcloth,  not  in 
silk  and  satin."  [Bloudy  Tenent,  p.  151.)  This  so-called 
poverty  is  however  not  the  poverty  of  the  proletarian 
suffering,  but  the  "plainness"  of  the  middle  class.  The 
kings  of  the  earth  seldom  enter  into  heavenly  glory:  Wil- 
liams trembles  approvingly  as  he  tells  how  Buchanan  on 
his  deathbed  directed  these  words  to  King  James  —  "Re- 
member my  humble  service  to  his  majesty,  and  tell  him 
Buchanan  is  going  to  a  place  where  few  kings  come."  ( Ibid. 
p.  151.)  "Not  many  wise  and  good  are  called  but  the  poor 
receive  the  Gospel,  as  God  hath  chosen  the  poor  of  the 
world  to  be  rich  in  faith."  ( Ibid.  p.  355. )  Thus  Williams 
can  express  the  conviction  that  persecution  oppresses  pre- 
dominately those  saints  of  God  who  indeed  never  share  in 
that  civil  power  which  does  the  persecuting.  It  is  only  a 
"seeming  impartiality,"  if  among  the  heaps  of  slaughtered 
an  anti-Christian  is  found  here  and  there.  ( Bloody  Tenent 
Yet  Adore  Bloody,  p.  34.  ) 

From  hence  it  is  not  much  further  to  a  spiritual  depre- 
ciation of  the  order  of  tolerance  which  makes  light  the  cross 
for  the  Saints  of  Christ.  Williams  has  at  the  bottom  of  his 
soul  very  little  faith  in  the  universal  realization  of  tolera- 
tion. Oppression  will  forever  be  the  distinctive  mark  of 
the  people  of  God,  and  will  remain  so.  The  Saints  have 
flourished  the  most  in  grace  and  piety  under  persecution. 
Constantine  was  more  fatal  to  the  church  of  God  than 
Nero.  ( Ibid.  p.  334. )  Thus  the  idea  of  toleration  will  not 
be  in  the  form  of  a  universal  world  order,  but  merely  a 
criterion  of  the  Saints  and  a  means  of  spiritual  justification. 


ROGER  WILLIAMS  133 

The  papists  ought  to  be  tolerated,  so  that  this  forbearance 
may  witness  against  them  and  their  persecution,  and  crush 
them  under  their  disgrace.  {Ibid.  p.  27.)  The  idea  of 
toleration  is,  as  a  whole,  not  to  be  considered  favorable  to 
the  liberation  of  mankind  in  general  from  guilt  and  evil, 
but  a  part  of  that  scheme  of  salvation  of  the  privileged  of 
God  out  of  the  universal  "lamentable  ship-wreck  of 
mankind." 


Queen's  Fort 

Mr.  Norman  M.  Isham  calls  attention  to  the  mention  of 
"The  Queen's  Fort,  so  called"  as  early  as  December  1724 
in  the  R.  I.  Colonial  Records  IV,  p.  349.  This  establishes 
the  fact  that  the  Queen's  Fort  was  called  by  that  name 
within  the  lifetime  of  persons  who  had  lived  through  King 
Philip's  War.  For  an  account  of  Queen's  Fort  see  R.I. Hist. 
Soc.  Collections  for  October,  1931. 


Notes 

The  following  persons  have  been  admitted  to  member- 
ship in  the  Society: 

Rev.  Paul  C.  Burhoe  Mrs.  John  R.  Freeman 

Mrs.  C.  H.  Horton 


134  RHODE  ISLAND  HISTORICAL  SOCIETY 


New  Publications  of  Rhode  Island  Interest 

A  History  and  Church  Directory  of  Holy  Trinity  Parish, 
Tiverton,  R.  I.,  1933,  by  Rev.  Herbert  B.  Gwyn,  is  a 
pamphlet  of  24  pages. 

The  John's  Island  Stud,  presented  to  the  Society  by  the 
author,  Fairfax  Harrison,  Esq.,  contains  an  important 
eight-page  account  of  early  Narragansett  pacers. 

An  historical  Map  of  South  Kingstown  by  Carder  H. 
Whaley  and  Alfred  T.  Taylor,  1933,  shows  the  original 
layouts  of  the  land  of  the  early  settlers. 

Antiques  for  July  1933  contains  several  items  of  Rhode 
Island  interest:  an  illustrated  editorial  on  Goddard's  clock 
cases  and  a  Goddard  table;  an  illustrated  account  of  Ethan 
Still  man,  gunsmith,  and  his  work,  by  Charles  D.  Cookj 
and  a  critical  study  of  a  Pawtucket  eagle  tavern  sign  by 
Homer  Eaton  Keyes. 

Some  Unpublished  Berkeley  Letters  with  some  new 
Berkeleiana  by  A.  A.  Luce,  is  a  reprint  of  20  pages  from  the 
April  1 933  Proceedings  of  the  Royal  Irish  Academy. 

The  July  issue  of  the  New  England  Historical  and 
Genealogical  Register  contains  an  article  on  the  early  gen- 
erations of  the  Knight  family  of  Rhode  Island  by  G.  An- 
drews Moriarty,  A.M.,  F.S.A. 

The  Mount  Hope  Bridge  Corporation  has  issued  an 
interesting  map  of  Newport  and  southeastern  Rhode 
Island. 


Form  of  Legacy 


"/  give  and  bequeath  to  the  Rhode  Island 
Historical  Society  the  sum  of 
dollars." 


Roger  Williams  Press        h\Jli^ 


t 


E.  A.  Johnson  Co. 


providence 


Rhode    Island 

Historical  Society 

Collections 


Vol.  XXVII 


JANUARY,   1934 


THE  CHINESE  JUNK  KE  YING  WHICH  VISITED 
PROVIDENCE  IN    1847.    (See  page  5) 


Issued  Quarterly 


68  Waterman  Street,  Providence,  Rhode  Island 


CONTENTS 


PAGE 

A  German  Regiment  at  Newport 

by  Hilmar  H.  Weber,  Ph.D.         ...  1 

The  Chinese  Junk  Ke  Ying 

by  Howard  M.  Chapin         ....  5 

Adam  and  Eve  at  Providence 

by  Solon  J.  Buck,  Ph.D 13 

Notes 14 

New  Publications 14 

Review  of  Sale)}/  in  the  Seventeenth  Century 

by  G.  Andrews  Moriarty,  F.S.A.   .  .  .  15 

List  of  Members 18 

The  Westconnaug  Purchase 

by  Theodore  G.  Foster         ....  24 


RHODE 
HISTORICAL 


ISLAND 

SOCIETY 


COLLECTIONS 


Vol.  XXVII      JANUARY,  1934 


No.  1 


William  Davis  Miller,  President   Gilbert  A.  Harrington,  Treasurer 
Howard  W.  Preston,  Secretary  Howard  M.  Chapin,  Librarian 


The  Society  assumes  no  responsibility  for  the  statements  or  the  opinions 
of  contributors. 


On  a  German  Regiment  Stationed 
at  Newport 

By  Hilmar  H.  Weber,  Ph.D. 

The  troops  of  the  German  allies  of  Great  Britain,  during 
the  American  War  of  Independence,  which  are  persistently 
misnamed  the  Hessian  Mercenaries  (being  neither  mercen- 
aries, nor  all  Hessians ),  have  been  unkindly  treated  by  fate. 
They  were  listed  in  the  Declaration  of  Independence 
among  the  grievances  of  the  Colonies ;  they  were  denounced 
in  scathing  terms  by  Schiller  j  and  they  have  finally  suffered 
from  the  altered  attitude  of  mind  that  accompanied  the 
change  in  the  whole  military  system  a  few  decades  after 
their  activity. 

Soldiering  in  the  seventeenth  and  eighteenth  century  was 
so  wholly  a  paid  profession,  that  it  mattered  little  to  the 
private  soldier,  and  scarcely  any  more  to  an  officer,  in  the 


2  RHODE  ISLAND  HISTORICAL  SOCIETY 

army  of  what  country  he  served.  Rulers  were  especially 
eager  to  nil  up  the  ranks  of  their  forces  with  foreigners,  and 
thereby  conserve  the  human  resources  of  their  own  state. 
Under  these  conditions  it  was  not  expected  that  a  man 
should  enter  upon  a  campaign  out  of  motives  of  patriotism 
or  devotion  to  his  native  soil.  He  fought  for  a  given  state 
because  he  had  voluntarily  entered  its  army,  and  he  was  as 
little  concerned  with  the  reasons  that  caused  this  state  to 
take  up  arms,  as  he  was  with  the  motives  of  the  opponent. 

Armies  in  the  eighteenth  century  were  small  and  costly, 
and  on  the  outbreak  of  a  war,  there  was  a  general  seeking  of 
allies  who  might  be  willing  to  put  a  few  carefully  trained 
regiments  at  ones  disposal.  Often  the  only  return  that  could 
be  given  was  subsidies,  since  a  share  of  conquered  territory 
would  have  had  no  value  to  a  small  state.  There  is  one  addi- 
tional feature  that  made  the  use  of  auxiliary,  or  as  they 
were  called  "subsidy",  troops  very  natural  in  the  case  of  the 
American  War  of  Independence:  it  was  regarded  in  Europe 
as  a  rebellion,  and  no  stigma  attaches  in  suppressing  it. 

It  is  interesting,  to  the  historian,  to  find  in  the  army 
registers  of  the  different  states  involved,  mention  of  service 
in  North  America.  The  Prussian  Army  Register  for  1806 
records  such  service  for  one  of  the  regiments.  As  Prussia  did 
not  furnish  any  troops  to  England  and,  in  fact,  Frederick 
the  Great  was  a  firm  friend  of  the  Colonies,  we  might  be 
surprised  at  this  mention  of  service  in  America,  till  we  saw 
that  it  was  only  in  1 792  that  the  Regiment  became  Prussian, 
it  having  previously  been  in  the  service  of  the  Margrave  of 
Ansbach-Bayreuth. 

The  history  of  Ansbach  and  Bayreuth  is  extremely  com- 
plicated. In  brief,  these  two  principalities  formed  the 
domains  of  the  Hohenzollern  family  before  they  became 
Margraves  and  Electors  of  Brandenburg.  These  two  prin- 
cipalities, situated  in  Southern  Germany  remained  separate 
practically  all  the  time,  and  were  ruled  by  the  cadet 
branches.  In  1761  Friedrich  Christian,  the  last  Margrave 
of  Bayreuth,  died,  and  the  Margrave  of  Ansbach  now  ruled 


GERMAN  REGIMENT 


over  both  principalities.  In  1791  he  abdicated  in  favor  of  his 
kinsman,  the  Elector  of  Brandenburg,  King  of  Prussia.  It 
was  on  this  occasion  that  the  two  regiments,  known  to  stu- 
dents of  the  American  Revolution  as  the  Ansbach  Regiment 
and  the  Bayreuth  Regiment  (which  names  show  that  the 
dominions  of  the  Margrave  of  Ansbach  consisted  of  two 
parts  recently  joined)  were  taken  over,  combined  into  a 
single  regiment,  into  tihe  Prussian  service. 

With  these  facts  in  mind,  we  can  now  turn  to  the  entry 
itself  which  is  to  be  found  on  pages  145  and  146  of : 
Stammliste  aller  Regimenter  und  Corps  der  Koniglich- 
Preussischen  Armee.  Fur  das  Jahr  1806.  Berlin,  1806.  Zum 
Besten  der  Militar-Erziehungs-Anstalten.  In  Commission 
der  Himburgschen  Buchhandlung. 

In  translation  it  reads  as  follows: 

No.  56  Regiment  Graf  Tauentzien 
(Franconian  Inspection) 

Garrison:  Neuenkirchen  near  Baireuth;  Culmbach  (Grena- 
diers )  j  Crailsheim  (third  battalion). 

Uniform:  Scarlet  cuff-facings,  revers,  and  collars.  Officers 
have  narrow  silver  lace  around  the  rims  of  the  hat,  con- 
vex silver  buttons,  and  silver  aguilettes. 

Recruiting  District:  Formerly  the  entire  principality  of 
Ansbach,  with  all  cities  situated  therein,  amounting  to 
36262  hearths,  constituted  the  recruiting  district,  and 
furnished  the  recruits  of  four  squadrons  of  the  Hussar 
Battalion  von  Bila.  The  dispositions  for  the  new  district 
are  still  to  be  made. 

Origin:  This  regiment  was  formed  in  1  794,  in  Mainz,  out  of 
the  former  Margravial  regiment:  Voit  von  Salzburg1, 
von  Reizenstein,  and  the  Grenadier  Battalion  von  Beust". 

1Voit  von  Salzburg  was  colonel  of  the  Regiment  Bayreuth  at  the  time 
of  the  surrender  at  Yorktown. 

2von  Beust  was  major  in  the  Regiment  Ansbach  at  the  same  time. 


4  kllOlM'.  ISLAND  HISTORICAL  SOCIETY 

Campaigns:  In  the  service  of  the  Margrave  of  Ansbach, 
the  Regiments  von  Voit  and  von  Reizenstein  took  part 
in  the  American  war  as  subsidy  troops  of  England,  from 
1  777  to  1783.  In  1777  they  took  part  in  the  expedition  of 
General  Clinton  on  the  North  River,  and  the  Grenadiers 
participated  in  the  storming  of  Fort  Montgomery.  Fur- 
ther they  helped  effect  the  opening  of  the  Delaware. 
In  1778  they  were  in  Newport,  and  after  the  relieving  of 
the  siege,  they  took  part  in  the  pursuit  of  the  enemy  and 
in  the  action  of  Turkey-Hill.  In  1  780  they  fought  in  the 
action  at  Springfield  on  the  Jersey.  In  1781  they  were 
under  Lord  Cornwall  is  in  the  fortified  and  besieged  camp 
at  Yorktown,  sharing  the  fate  of  the  Corps,  and  remained 
as  prisoners  of  war  in  Virginia. 

In  1788  the  Grenadier  Battalion  von  Beust  and  the 
Regiment  von  Reizenstein  served  as  garrison  of  Nim- 
wegen  as  Dutch  subsidy  troops.  In  1  792  they  entered  the 
Royal''  service,  and  participated  in  the  campaign  of  1793 
with  the  Dutch  Army.  They  were  present  at  the  blockade 
of  Breda,  participated  in  the  attack  of  Muschin,  during 
the  battle  of  Famars,  as  vanguard  of  the  Dutch  Corps ; 
they  defended  Lanoy  in  Flanders  for  twelve  weeks 
against  many  threatened  attacks  and  aformal  assault  with 
heavy  artillery.  They  were  present  at  the  blockade  of 
Maubeuge,  and  shared  notably  in  the  defence  of  the  Bois 
de  Tilleul.  In  1  794  they  were  transferred  to  the  Army  of 
the  Rhine,  where  they  remained  as  defence  for  the  Line 
of  Demarcation  till  November  1795,  and  then  returned 
to  their  garrison4. 

Commanders: 

1 794  Major  General  von  Reizenstein,  died. 

1795  Colonel  von  Laurens,  died  a  major  general  in  1803. 
1  804  Major  General  Count  von  Tauentzien. 

''This  means,  of  course,  Prussian  service. 

4The  regiment  was  disbanded  in   1  S06  or  1S07. 


CHINESE  JUNK 


The  Chinese  Junk  Ke  Ying  at  Providence 

By  Howard  M.  Chapin 

Miss  Caroline  Hazard  recently  presented  to  the  Society 
an  undated  broadside  bearing  the  picture  of  a  Chinese  junk. 
This  junk  has  been  identified  as  the  Keying.  According  to 
information  supplied  by  the  Peabody  Museum  of  Salem: 
"She  sailed  from  Hong  Kong,  Dec.  6,  1846,  and  was  off 
the  Cape  of  Good  Hope  1  14  days  out.  Seventeen  days  later 
she  arrived  at  St.  Helena,  where  she  remained  for  some 
time.  From  there  she  went  to  New  York  and  then  around 
to  Boston.  She  sailed  from  Boston  for  London  on  Feb.  17, 
1848." 

A  search  through  Rhode  Island  newspapers  disclosed 
several  items  showing  that  she  arrived  at  Newport  October 
24,  reached  Providence  on  Nov.  2,  sailed  for  Fall  River  on 
Nov.  1 2,  and  reached  Boston  Nov.  20. 

The  Keying  was  in  New  York  in  September  1 847  and  the 
following  item  appeared  in  the  Providence  Journal1  of  Sep- 
tember 6,  1  847. 

"the  junketing  of  the  junketeers. — 

"The  seven  Chinamen,  of  the  crew  of  the  Keying,  Capt.  Kel- 
lett,  were  examined  at  the  Special  Sessions  yesterday,  and 
discharged.  So  far  as  the  reports  in  the  morning  papers  are 
to  be  relied  upon,  it  would  seem  that  the  crew  had  become 
dissatisfied  with  their  long  detention  from  their  'own,  then- 
native  land,'  and  sought  by  force  to  induce  the  captain  to 
fulfill  a  contract  made  with  them,  to  the  effect  that  the 
voyage  was  to  be  limited  to  eight  months,  at  eight  dollars 
per  month  wages. 

1Also  in  The  Mariujaeturers  and  Farmers  Journal  of  the  same  date. 


RHODE  ISLAND  HISTORICAL  SOCIETY 

CHINESE 
JUNK. 


The  greatest  curiosity  ever  exhibited  in  this  city,  may 

now  be  seen  at 
FOX  POINT   WHARF,  FOR  A  FEW  DAYS. 


This  is,  probably,  the  only  opportunity  (hat  will  ever 
be  offered  to  our  citizens  of  viewing  this  great  wonder 
of  the  Western  World. 

The  Junk  is  a  perfect  model  of  Chinese  ship  build- 
ing 2000  years  since.     [Q= Admission  25  cents. 
Open  for  exhibition,  from  9  o'clock,  A.  M.  to  6  P.  M. 


From  original  recently  presented  to  (his  Society  by  Miss  Caroline  Hazard. 


CHINESE  JUNK  / 

"The  men  complained  that  they  rarely  saw  the  captain, 
but  at  length  finding  him  with  the  mate  in  Castle  Garden, 
they  gathered  around  the  two,  disputes  arose,  and  blows 
followed.  The  prisoners  allege  that  the  mate  struck  the  first 
blow,  whereas  the  mate  and  captain  both  testified  that  the 
assault  commenced  on  the  part  of  the  prisoners.  That  the 
crew  had  beaten  the  mate  and  otherwise  acted  riotously,  ap- 
pears plainly  enough  j  but  probably  there  was  much  diffi- 
culty in  clearly  comprehending  the  whole  case,  and  the 
Court  inclining  to  a  merciful  view  of  their  conduct,  dis- 
charged the  offenders.  How  far  this  decision  will  affect  the 
contract  with  the  entire  crew  is  a  question  in  which  the  cap- 
tain, we  presume,  will  be  somewhat  interested.  The  agree- 
ment, as  translated  by  Mr.  Williams,  is  as  follows.  It  was 
about  six  inches  long  and  four  wide,  and  written  in  Chinese 
on  pink  rice  paper. 

"  'This'is  to  be  a  true  testimony  about  going  on  a  foreign 
seas.  This  man  is  from  Chow  Chow.  There  is  now  an  Eng- 
lish country's  captain,  who  has  set  up  a  voyage  in  a  vessel 
called  the  Keying.  This  is  to  request  men  to  go  on  a  foreign 
ocean  from  Hong  Kong.  The  limit  of  the  voyage  is  eight 
months,  at  $8  per  month. 

"  'That  when  they  get  to  the  end  of  the  voyage  if  they 
wish  they  can  return  home — the  captain  shall  provide  them 
with  a  good  ship  and  pay  all  expenses.  As  they  can't  give 
security,  they  form  themselves  into  a  brethern  25  in  all. 
They  are  not  to  run  away  or  steal  anything  from  the  vessel. 
The  contract  is  understood  in  the  shop  Meekin;  and  is 
clearly  and  fully  understood  by  the  captain,  and  he  take  this 
to  be  our  contract.  Dated  on  the  26th  of  the  year  of  the 
Emperor  Taou-Kwang,  (August,  18262,  of  our  year).'  N. 
Y.  Com.  Adv." 

The  Newport  Mercury  of  October  30  contains  these  two 
items: 

"Arrived.  Sunday,  Oct.  24.  Chinese  Junk,  fm  New  York 
for  Boston." 

JMisprint  in  newspaper  for  1  846. 


8  RHODE  ISLAND  HISTORICAL  SOCIETY 

"The  Chinese  Junk — This  outlandish  craft  arrived  in 
our  harbor  on  Sunday  last  from  New  York,  on  her  way  to 
Boston.  Since  her  arrival  she  has  been  exhibited  for  several 
days  to  the  public  at  25  cents  each,  but  does  not  appear  to 
have  excited  much  curiosity,  and  the  number  of  visitors  are 
said  to  be  small." 

The  Manufacturers  and  Farmers  Journal  (  Providence  ), 
in  its  issue  of  October  28,  quoting  from  the  Newport  News, 
said: 

"The  Junk — Ten  of  the  hands  belonging  on  board  the 
Junk,  who  had  received  about  a  month's  wages  in  advance, 
took  a  boat  from  her  yesterday  morning  and  came  ashore, 
landing  at  Long  Wharf,  and  immediately  made  tracks  out 
of  town.  Officer  Smith  was  put  on  track  of  them,  and  suc- 
ceeded in  arresting  two  of  them,  who  are  now  locked  up. 
The  others  took  'leg  bail  for  security,'  and  their  where- 
abouts has  not  as  yet  been  ascertained." 

The  Providence  Journal'''  of  October  28,  reports: 

"The  Chinese  Junk — We  understand  that  the  Junk  has 

cleared  at  Newport  for  Providence,"  but  in  the  Nov.    1 

issue: 

"The  Junk — We  were  misinformed  when  we  supposed 

the  Junk  had  cleared  at  Newport  for  Providence." 

The  Providence  Journal  of  Nov.  2,  informs  us: 
"The  Junk  is  coming  to  Providence  after  all.  She  is  ex- 
pected to  be  at  Fox  Point  Wharf,  ready  for  exhibition,  to 
morrow  morning.  The  Perry  is  to  tow  her  up  to-day." 

The  Newport  Mercury  of  November  6  tells  us: 
"The  Junk  was  towed  to  Providence  on  Monday  night 
last  by  the  steamer  Perry." 

The  Republican  Herald  of  Providence  in  the  issue  of 
November  6,  records  the  arrival  on  Tuesday,  Nov.  2,  of 
"Chinese  Junk  Keying,  Kellett,  from  Newport,  in  tow  of 


;.\lso  in  The  Manufacturers  and  Farmer.*  Journal. 


CHINESE  JUNK  9 

the  steamer  Perry"  and  also  contains  the  following  news 
item: 

"Chinese  junk  —  This  specimen  of  oriental  naval 
architecture  is  attracting  crowds  of  visitors,  and  it  is  indeed 
worthy  of  a  minute  examination.  To  view  the  exterior  of 
this  misshapen  ship  is  worth  more  than  a  journey  to  Fox 
Point,  and  that  gratification  may  be  had  for  the  mere  walk, 
"without  money  and  without  price."  But  it  becomes  a  much 
greater  curiosity  to  examine  the  interior,  with  the  advantage 
of  the  explanations  which  will  be  given  by  the  Captain  or 
some  of  his  intelligent  officers  and  assistants.  We  enjoyed 
that  treat  last  Wednesday,  and  recommend  to  all  our  read- 
ers not  to  suffer  this  opportunity  to  pass  of  examining  this 
very  extraordinary  vessel,  it  is  probably  constructed  on  the 
model  of  marine  craft  used  thousands  of  years  ago,  as  far 
back  perhaps  as  the  Trojan  war,  and  not  unlike  the  one  in 
which  Aeneas  visited  Carthage  to  make  love  to  and  desert 
the  widow  Dido." 

The  Providence  Journal  of  November  3  contains  three 
items  in  regard  to  the  arrival  of  the  much  heralded  Junk. 

The  Marine  Intelligence  records  her  arrival  on  Novem- 
ber 2  and  an  advertisement  and  news  item4  appear  on  the 
same  page. 

The  advertisement  reads: 


"CHINESE  JUNK 


"The  Wonder  of  the  Western  World  is  now  exhibiting 
at  Fox  Point  wharf,  where  she  will  remain  for  three  days 
only.  We  would  advise  those  who  wish  to  see  this  great 
curiosity — for  they  will  never  have  the  chance  of  seeing  an- 
other in  these  waters — to  proceed  on  board  at  once. 

"Hours  of  exhibition  from  9  a.  m.  till  6  p.  m. 

"Admission  25  cts." 

The  news  item  reads: 


'Also  in  The  Manufacturers  and  Farmers  Journal  of  Nov.  4. 


10  RHODE  ISLAND  HISTORICAL  SOCIETY 

"The  Junk  will  be  open  for  exhibition  this  morning  at  9 
o'clock.  We  cannot  add  any  thing  to  the  description  that  has 
already  been  published.  She  is  a  wonder  of  this  Western 
World ;  and  this  is  the  only  opportunity  our  citizens  will 
ever  have  of  seeing  her.  There  are  three  native  Chinaman 
on  board  of  her, — a  mandarin",  an  artist,  (  several  specimens 
of  whose  paintings  may  be  seen  on  board, )  and  a  young  lad. 
The  Junk  lies  at  Fox  Point  Wharf." 

The  Daily  Evening  Transcript  contained  three  news 
items  in  regard  to  the  junk. 

On  November  2  "The  Chinese  Junk  has  arrived  and  will 
be  open  for  exhibition,  to-morrow,  at  Fox  Point  Wharf.  She 
is  a  queer  looking  craft  and  no  mistake.  We  heard  one  of  the 
"outside  barbarians"  who  was  looking  at  her  this  morning, 
say,  "well  she's  a  curious  curiosity,  anyway".  The  captain 
assures  us  that  there  is  not  the  slightest  occasion  for  tying  up 
favorite  dogs  during  the  stay  of  the  Junk,  for  the  dog-eaters 
have  been  sent  home." 

On  November  5,  "Yesterday  we  visited  this  truly  won- 
derful wonder  of  the  world,  and  to  our  astonishment  found 
a  Museum  on  board.  Indeed  it  would  well  repay  our  war- 
fare genius  if  only  to  see  the  arms  used  during  the  late  war 
with  the  English.  To  those  fond  of  music  their  singular 
instruments  all  can  be  seen; — in  fact  a  little  of  everything 
contained  in  that  magnificent  country.  The  vessel  herself 
is  to  the  beholder  a  great  wonder — being  totally  different 
from  any  of  our  ships.  Instead  of  iron  cables  and  anchors, 
wood  is  substituted. — 

"A  curious  Chinese  dog  is  also  on  board,  which  opens  its 
mouth  to  allow  visitors  to  see  that  the  inside  of  the  mouth 
and  tongue  is  of  the  same  color  as  its  coat".  Go  every  person 

r'Mr.  W.  H.  Everest  contributes  two  notes  on  this  mandarin.  According 
to  the  Edinburgh  Review  the  mandarin  was  "Hesing,  a  mandarin  of  the 
fifth  class,  whose  distinctive  mark  is  a  crystal  button  on  top  of  his  cap." 
The  New  York  Morning  Courier  of  |ulv  13  says  that  he  was  Eesing,  a 
mandarin  of  the  second  class  "who  at  home  ranks  as  Earls  do  in  England." 

''Probably  a  black  chow. 


CHINESE  JUNK  11 

must,  for  we  are  assured  they  will  never  regret  paying  25 
cents. 

"The  Junk  will  remain  open  a  few  days  more  to  allow 
our  citizens  a  fair  chance  of  seeing  her." 

On  November  12,  "The  Chinese  dog,  belonging  to  the 
Junk,  ran  away  on  Tuesday,  and  wandered  over  into  See- 
konk.  Mrs.  Smith  was  on  board  at  the  time  and  hearing  the 
loss,  exclaimed  "he's  a  misfortunate  and  foolish  creeter  to 
wander  away  from  his  friends.  What  in  airth  he'll  do  I  don't 
see,  for  he  don't  understand  a  word  of  English."  And  the 
old  lady  offered  the  mandarin  a  punch  of  snuff." 

The  Transcript  of  Nov.  9  tells  us: 

"The  Chinese  Junk  stays  here  until  Thursday  next.7 
About  6000  persons  have  visited  her  during  the  short  time 
she  has  been  opened  for  exhibition." 

The  Transcript's  Marine  Intelligence  on  Nov.  12 
records : 

"Cleared — Chinese  Junk,  Lane,  Fall  River,  and  dropped 
below,  she  is  to  be  towed  by  the  steamer  Perry,"  and  the 
Journal  of  Nov.  13,  in  its  Marine  Intelligence  under  date 
of  Friday  Nov.  12  says  "Sailed — Chinese  Junk  Keying, 
Fall  River,  ( in  tow  of  steamer  Perry )." 

The  Transcript  of  November  17,  reported: 

"The  Chinese  Junk — The  Holmes'  Hole  correspondent 
of  the  Merchant's  Exchange,  under  date  of  Monday*  after- 
noon, says:  'Passed  by  Chinese  Junk  Keying,  in  tow  of  the 
steamer  R.  B.  Forbes'.  So  she  will  probablv  reach  Boston  to- 
day." 

A  similar  item  appears  in  the  Journal  of  Nov.  1  7 : 

"Holmes'  Hole.  Passed  by  1  5th  Chinese  Junk  Keying, 
last  from  Fall  River  for  Boston  in  tow  of  the  R.  B.  Forbes." 


7Nov.  11. 
sNov.  15. 


12  RHODE    ISLAND    HISTORICAL    SOCIETY 

The  Manufacturers  and  Farmers  Journal  of  November 
22,  records:  "The  Chinese  Junk  has  arrived  at  Boston." 

The  Newport  Mercury  of  November  27,  quotes  from  the 
Boston  Advertiser: 

"The  Keying — The  proprietors  of  this  vessel  were  un- 
able to  reach  her  proposed  destination  on  Saturday  night'. 
The  consequence  was  that  she  lay  through  Sunday,  between 
Charlestown  and  Warren  bridges,  exposed  to  the  view  of  a 
great  number  of  people,  who  took  advantage  of  the  occasion, 
and  got  a  pretty  fair  sight  of  her  gratis" 

Mr.  W.  H.  Everest  of  New  Haven  contributes  some  in- 
teresting items  from  New  York  and  European  papers,  in 
regard  to  the  Keying.  According  to  the  New  York  Morning 
Courier,  the  Keying  arrived  at  New  York  on  July  1 2,  1  847, 
2 1 2  days  from  Canton,  with  sixty  persons  on  board  of  whom 
forty  were  Chinamen. 

John  Bully  a  London  weekly  newspaper,  in  March  1  848, 
stated  that  the  Keying  left  Canton  on  Oct.  19,  1846,  was 
off  the  Cape  of  Good  Hope  on  March  30,  1  847,  arrived  at 
St.  Helena  April  1  7,  sailed  April  23,  arrived  at  New  York 
on  July  9,  left  Boston  on  Feb.  17,  1848,  touched  at  the 
island  of  Jersey  on  March  15  and  reached  London  on 
March  28.* 

The  New  York  Evening  Post  of  July  1 2,  1  847  said  that 
the  Keying  was  originally  built  as  a  war  vessel  and  that  "she 
was  an  excellent  sea  boat  of  about  700  tons,  being  150  feet 
long,  25  feet  beam  and  12  feet  hold."  She  was  built  of  teak 
wood,  had  three  masts  with  lateen  sails  and  was  painted 
white  striped  with  black,  with  an  eye  painted  on  either  side 
of  her  bow  and  a  spread  eagle  on  her  stern.  She  cost 
$75,000. 

9Nov.  20. 


ADAM   AND   EVE 


13 


Adam  and  Eve  at  Providence 

Extract  from  the  diary  of  Lucius  C.  Boynton 
Communicated  by  Solon  J.  Buck,  Ph.D. 

November  20,  [1850].  Yesterday  I  went  on  an  Excur- 
sion to  Providence,  to  see  Pratt's  picture  of  the  garden  of 
Eden,  from  Milton.  A  great  crowd  of  persons  were  along. 
Mrs.  Cole  and  Mr.  Judson,  Miss  Day  and  a  Miss  Georgia 
Williams,  who  has  been  here  at  school,  were  of  our  com- 
pany. It  was  a  beautiful  day,  and  with  the  crowd  and  the 
excitement  and  the  good  humor  of  the  company,  we  had  a 
charming  trip. 

The  picture  was  much  more  beautiful  than  I  expected. 
The  landscape  scenes  were  charming,  and  the  trees  and 
flowers  were  natural,  and  beautiful  beyond  description. 
Adam  and  Eve  appeared  in  three  places,  in  a  state  of  perfect 
nudity,  their  skins  white  and  fair  as  that  of  persons  who  wear 
clothing  in  our  day. 

Their  appearance  was  a  little  stiff  and  unnatural.  They 
did  not  seem  to  be  in  the  enjoyment  of  that  easy,  quiet, 
charmed  life,  which  one  would  expect  such  persons  would 
lead,  amidst  so  much  beauty  and  magnificence.  The  botan- 
ical part  was  interesting,  exhibiting  some  of  the  most  beauti- 
ful plants  of  the  Tropical  regions". 

^ucien  Cyrus  Boynton  was  born  in  Vermont  about  1810.  He  was 
graduated  from  Andover  Theological  Seminary  in  1838,  after  which  he 
taught  school  for  about  two  years  in  New  Jersey  and  some  four  years  in 
Virginia.  He  then  returned  to  New  England,  where  he  read  law,  and  in 
1846  he  was  admitted  to  the  bar  in  Woodstock,  Vermont.  After  some 
vicissitudes,  he  settled  down  in  Uxbridge,  Mass.,  to  practice,  and  he  was 
living  there  at  the  time  of  his  trip  to  Providence,  recounted  in  the  extract. 
Later  he  moved  to  Springfield,  Illinois,  where  he  died.  His  journal,  a 
voluminous  affair,  runs  from  183  5  to  185  3  and  not  only  recounts  his 
activities  but  also  records  his  reactions  to  various  problems,  both  theologi- 
cal and  secular,  and  discloses  a  character  of  unusual  interest. 

2This  diarv  is  to  be  printed  in  The  American  Antiquarian  Society 
Proceedings. 


14  RHODE  ISLAND  HISTORICAL  SOCIETY 

The  following  advertisement  in  regard  to  Pratt's  picture 
appeared  in  the  Providence  Journal  in  November,  1850.  : 

SPLENDID   WORK   OF   ART 

Is  now  on  exhibition  at  Franklin  Hall,  Pratt's  great  Botan- 
ical and  Poetical  Panorama  of  the  Garden  of  Eden,  as 
described  in  Milton's  Paradise,  an  immense  moving  mirror 
of  nature,  presenting  a  vast  range  of  gorgeous  scenery,  with 
the  most  remarkable  and  beautiful  animals,  birds,  rare  and 
splendid  trees,  fruits  and  flowers  of  every  clime.  Also,  three 
groups  of  Adam  and  Eve,  of  the  natural  size,  painted  in  oil 
colors  and  highly  finished.  Doors  open  every  evening  at 
6l/2 — commence  moving  at  7^  o'clock.  Admittance  25 
cents ;  children  half  price.  There  will  be  an  exhibition  every 
Wednesday  and  Saturday  afternoon,  at  3  o'clock,  tf  o22 

Notes 

The  following  persons  have  been  elected  to  membership 
in  the  Society: 

Prof.  James  B.  Hedges  Mr.  Zenas  H.  Ellis 

Eliot  A.  Shaw,  M.D. 

New  Publications  of  Rhode  Island  Interest 

Rhode  Island  Banks  During  the  Bank  Holidays  of 
Marc/?  1 933 y  compiled  by  the  Rhode  Island  Hospital  Trust 
Company,  is  a  volume  of  64  pages  with  a  frontispiece  illus- 
tration of  a  "one  dollar  scrip". 

The  American  Genealogist  for  October  1933  contains 
some  English  records  relating  to  Thomas  Olney  and  iden- 
tifying his  wife  as  Mary,  daughter  of  James  Ashton  of  St. 
Albans,  Herts. 

Chester  Willard  Barrows,  a  memorial  address  by  James 
C.  Collins,  Esq.  was  issued  as  an  illustrated  booklet  of 
1  8  pages. 

Sergeant  John  Smith's  Diary  of  1776,  edited  by  Louise 
Rau,  is  a  pamphlet  of  21  pages  reprinted  from  the  Mississ- 


NEW  PUBLICATIONS  15 

ippi  Valley  Historical  Review.    Sergeant  Smith  was  a  resi- 
dent of  Bristol,  R.  I. 

The  Evening  Bulletin  of  September  26,  1933  contained 
an  account  of  Russell  Warren,  the  architect,  and  his  work. 

Our  Earliest  Colonial  Settlements  by  Charles  M.  An- 
drews contains  a  25  page  chapter  on  Rhode  Island,  the 
Troubled  Home  of  Soul  Liberty. 

The  Correspondence  of  Esek  Hopkins,  has  just  been 
published  by  the  Rhode  Island  Historical  Society  from  the 
original  manuscripts  in  its  library,  as  a  volume  of  1 0 1  pages 
with  an  introduction  by  William  Davis  Miller.  It  is  a  com- 
panion volume  to  the  Letter  Book  of  Esek  Hopkins  which 
was  published  by  the  Society  in  1 932. 

Book  Review 

Salem  in  the  Seventeenth  Century 
by  James  Duncan  Phillips,  Riverside  Press 

The  principal  interest  to  Rhode  Islanders  in  Mr.  Phil- 
lips' excellent  history  of  the  social  and  economic  life  of  Salem 
is  the  part  dealing  with  the  general  history  of  the  Massa- 
chusetts Bay  Colony  and  its  heretics.  Mr.  Phillips,  a  "dyed 
in  the  wool"  Massachusetts  man,  is  a  historian  of  the  old 
school,  after  the  manner  of  Palfrey  or  Ellis.  The  Massa- 
chusetts magistrates  could  do  no  wrong.  He  deals  with 
Roger  Williams,  the  Quakers,  Dr.  Child  and  Randolph  at 
length  and  vigorously  belabours  all  of  them.. 

With  regard  to  Williams,  his  stand  is  very  simple.  The 
Massachusetts  Puritans  came  to  establish  their  own  form 
of  government  and  so  were  perfectly  justified  in  driving 
out  all  who  differed  from  them.  Roger  Williams  did  differ 
from  them,  was  a  trouble  maker  and  so  he  was  exiled.  Now 
there  is  no  doubt  but  that  Williams  was  a  troublesome  fel- 
low and  inclined  to  make  mountains  out  of  mole  hills,  and 
granting  Mr.  Phillips'  premise,  the  Theocracy  was  per- 


16  RHODE  ISLAND  HISTORICAL  SOCIETY 

fectly  justified.  But  Williams  was  one  of  the  earliest  found- 
ers of  the  Bay  Colony  (he  came  in  1631)  and  was  certainly 
as  much  entitled  to  have  a  voice  in  the  principles  upon  which 
the  Colony  was  founded  as  anyone  else.  He  was  unhappily 
in  the  minority  and,  according  to  Mr.  Phillips'  view,  had 
no  right  to  express  his  opinions  upon  religious  matters, 
which  differed  from  those  of  the  majority,  not  necessarily 
of  the  settlers,  but  of  the  magistrates.  Let  us  grant  this  and 
admit  that  the  majority  of  the  magistrates  could  banish 
those  who  differed  from  them.  Then  certainly  Massachu- 
setts was  not  a  free  Colony  nor  did  its  rulers  differ  in  any 
degree  from  Archbishop  Laud.  If  Mr.  Phillips'  premise  is 
sound  then  the  Anglicans  of  the  dominant  party  in  the 
.Church  at  home  were  fully  justified  in  their  stand  regard- 
ing the  Puritans.  But  this  logical  conclusion  is  one  that  Mr. 
Phillips  is  somewhat  loath  to  admit.  He  cannot  help  feeling 
that  Laud's  conduct  towards  his  beloved  rulers  of  Massa- 
chusetts was  not  to  be  justified  and  savoured  of  tyranny. 

Upon  a  broader  basis,  Williams  was  contending  for  t he- 
great  principle,  which  the  world  has  since  recognized,  that 
the  civil  authorities  must  not  punish  a  man  for  his  religious 
beliefs.  The  great  principle  of  toleration  is  one  that  Mr. 
Phillips  fails  totally  to  comprehend.  He  is  blind  to  the 
wide  humanitarian  views  of  Williams  or  to  the  singular 
kindliness  of  his  spirit  that  enabled  him  to  return,  as  in  the 
Pequot  War,  good  for  evil,  and  enabled  him  to  retain  the 
personal  friendship  of  his  opponents,  who  have  described 
him  as  a  "man  of  a  very  lovely  carriage."  Upon  a  narrow 
view  of  the  situation,  Mr.  Phillips  may  justify  his  stand  but 
to  the  broader  and  more  humane  view  of  the  situation  he  is 
strangely  blind.  As  the  London  Times  recently  put  it  in  its 
able  review  of  Dr.  Ernst's  recent  Life  of  Williams,  perhaps 
the  Massachusetts  authorities  were  legally  justified  in  his 
banishment  but  "along  that  way  persecution  lies."  Mr. 
Phillips'  statement  covers  only  one  side  of  the  question;  to 
the  other  aspects  of  the  Williams  episode  he  is  strangely 
ignorant  or  intentionally  silent. 


BOOK  REVIEW  17 

With  respect  to  the  Quakers  he  has  a  better  case.  The 
Quakers  were  fanatics  and  disturbers  of  the  public  peace 
and  the  Bay  magistrates  were  justified  in  restraining  them; 
but  the  extreme  harshness,  extending  to  the  death  penalty, 
outran  the  offence.  Certainly  the  picture  of  Endicott  throw- 
ing his  skull  cap  on  the  Council  table  and  threatening  to  go 
back  to  England  if  he  could  not  hang  Quakers  is  not  a 
pretty  one,  nor  is  that  of  Norton,  tormenting  the  last 
moments  of  Mary  Dyer,  as  she  went  to  execution,  an  edify- 
ing one.  Mr.  Phillips  wisely  is  silent  regarding  these  little 
incidents  in  his  defense  of  the  Theocracy. 

In  his  treatment  of  the  Randolph  controversy  Mr.  Phil- 
lips turns  about  face  and  rejoices  in  the  resistance  of  the 
Puritans  to  the  "oppression"  of  the  Crown.  The  picture  of 
the  Theocracy  in  the  role  of  the  champion  of  liberty  is  a 
startling  transformation.  As  a  matter  of  fact  it  was  Charles 
II,  who  curbed  the  insolence  of  the  Bay  magistrates  and 
compelled  them  to  show  some  sort  of  toleration  and  mercy. 
Randolph  was  no  angel,  he  was  a  corrupt  Restoration  poli- 
tician, but  the  manner  in  which  he  was  treated,  unwise  and 
stupid  to  say  the  least,  turned  him  into  a  bitter  and  vindic- 
tive enemy  of  Massachusetts  and  brought  about  the  final 
overthrow  of  the  Theocratic  tyranny  that  had  lorded  it  in 
the  Bay  Colony  for  over  fifty  years. 

It  is  a  well  known  fact  that  the  rulers  of  Massachusetts 
by  restricting  the  franchise  to  church  members  prevented 
the  great  body  of  people  from  making  their  views  felt  in 
their  government  and  created  anything  but  a  free  state.  Mr. 
Phillips'  excuse  that  probably  the  people  did  not  care  any- 
thing about  the  franchise  is  naive  and  somewhat  amusing. 
However,  when  all  is  said  and  done  it  is  stimulating  to  find 
so  one  sided  a  defender  of  the  Bay  magistrates  at  this  late 
date.  Mr.  Phillips  has  presented  us  with  an  able  and 
ingenious  piece  of  special  pleading  and  has  skillfully  sup- 
pressed the  other  side  of  the  question.  It  makes  a  fine  argu- 
ment but  this  is  not  history. 

G.  Andrews  Moriarty. 


RHODI-:    ISLAND     HISTORICAL    SOC1KTY 


List  of  Active  Members  of  the  Rhode  Island 
Historical  Society. 

December  1,  1933 


Mr.  David  C  Adelman 

Mr.  Frederick  W.  Aldred 

Mr.  Edward  K.  Aldrich,  Jr. 

Miss  Lucy  T.  Aldrich 

Hon.  Richard  S.  Aldrich 

Mr.  Stuart  M.  Aldrich 

Mr.  Philip  Allen 

Miss  Ada  Almy 

Mr.  Walter  F.  Angell 

Mrs.  Everard  Appleton 

Mr.  John  B.  Archer 

Mr.  Arthur  H.  Armington 

Miss  Maude  E.  Armstrong 

Mrs.  Edward  E.  Arnold 

Mr.  Frederick  W.  Arnold 

Miss  Mittie  Arnold 

Mr.  James  H.  Arthur 

Mr.  Donald  S.  Babcock 

Mr.  Albert  A.  Baker 

Mrs.  Charles  K.  Baker 

Mr.  Harvey  A.  Baker 

Mr.  J.  Willard  Baker 

Miss  Mary  H.  Balch 

Mrs.  Walter  S.  Ball 

Rev.  Clarence  A.  Barbour,  D.D. 

Mrs.  Sarah  Minchin  Barker 

Harry  Lee  Barnes,  M.D. 

Miss  Sarah  Dyer  Barnes 

Miss  Hattie  B.  Barns 

Mr.  Fred  H.  Barrows 

Mr.  Earl  G.  Batty 

Mrs.  Daniel  Beckwith 

Mrs.  Herbert  G.  Beede 

Mr.  Horace  G.  Belcher 

Mr.  Horatio  E.  Bellows 

Mr.  Bruce  M.  Bigelow 

Mr.  George  E.  Bixby 


Mr.  Zenas  W.  Bliss 
Mrs.  Edward  W.  Blodgett 
G.  Alder  Blumer,  M.D. 
Mr.  J.  J.  Bodell 
Mrs.  Theodore  P.  Bogert 
Harold  Bowditch,  M.D. 
Mr.  Richard  LeB.  Bowen 
Mr.  Claude  R.  Branch 
Mrs.  William  C.  H.  Brand 
Miss  Alice  Bray  ton 
Miss  Elizabeth  H.  Brayton 
Miss  Ida  F.  Bridgham 
Mr.  Herbert  O.  Brigham 
Mr.  William  E.  Brigham 
Mrs.  William  E.  Brigham 
Miss  Eva  St.  C.  Brightman 
Mrs.  Clarence  A.  Brouwer 
Mr.  Clarence  Irving  Brown 
Mr.  Cyrus  P.  Brown 
Mr.  Frank  Hail  Brown 
Mrs.  Frank  Hail  Brown 
Miss  Isabel  R.  Brown 
Mr.  John  Nicholas  Brown 
Madelaine  R.  Brown,  M.D. 
Mr.  Wilbur  D.  Brown 
Mr.  Alfred  S.  Brownell 
Capt.  Ernest  H.  Brownell 
Mr.  Edward  C.  Bucklin 
Mr.  Harris  H.  Bucklin 
Miss  Clara  Buffum 
Mr.  Frederick  H.  Buffum 
Mr.  Edward  J.  C.  Bullock 
Mrs.  Edward'  J.  C.  Bullock 
Rev.  Paul  E.  Burhoe 
Mr.  Edwin  A.  Burlingame 
Mr.  Raymond  Buss 
Mr.  Alfred  T.  Butler 


LIST   OF    MEMBERS 


19 


Miss  Irene  B.  Butler 
Mr.  G.  Edward  Buxton 
Mrs.  S.  H.  Cabot 
Mrs.  Edwin  A.  Cady 
Mr.  John  H.  Cady 
Mrs.  Charles  A.  Calder 
Miss  Helen  G.  Calder 
Frank  T.  Calef,  M.D. 
Mr.  Herbert  C.  Calef 
Mrs.  Walter  R.  Callender    H 
Mrs.  Wallace  Campbell 
Mr.  Emilio  N.  Cappelli 
Mr.  Thomas  B.  Card 
Mrs.  George  W.  Carr 
Mr.  Edward  Carrington 
Mrs.  Marion  P.  Carter 
Miss  Anna  H.  Chace 
Mr.  Malcolm  G.  Chace 
Mr.  Henry  S.  Chafee 
Mrs.  Everitte-S.  Chaffee 
Prof.  Robert  F.  Chambers 
Mr.  Arthur  D.  Champlin 
Mr.  George  B.  Champlin 
Mr.  George  Allen  Chandler 
Miss  Anna  Chapin 
Charles  V.  Chapin,  M.D. 
Mrs.  Charles  V.  Chapin 
Mr.  Howard  M.  Chapin 
Mrs.  Howard  M.  Chapin 
Mr.  William  P.  Chapin 
Mr.  Frederic  L.  Chase 
Julian  A.  Chase,  M.D. 
Edmund  D.  Chesebro,  M.D. 
Mr.  Albert  W.  Clanin 
Mrs.  Edward  S.  Clark 
Mr.  Prescott  O.  Clarke 
Mr.  J.  Earl  Clauson 
Mr.  Eugene  A.  Clauss 
Prof.  Theodore  Collier 
Mrs.  Clarkson  A.  Collins,  Jr. 
Mr.  James  C.  Collins 
Mr.  Edward  L.  Coman 
Mr.  Jonathan  F.  Comstock 
Mrs.  Mabel  B.  Comstock 
Mrs.  W.  A.  H.  Comstock 


Mr.  Walter  J.  Comstock 

Mr.  William  P.  Comstock 

Mr.  Charles  D.  Cook 

Mrs.  Charles  D.  Cook 

Mr.  Albert  B.  Coulters 

Prof.  Verner  W.  Crane 

Mr.  Frank  H.  Cranston 

George  H.  Crooker,  M.D. 

Mr.  Harry  Parsons  Cross 

Frank  Anthony  Cummings,  M.D. 

Mrs.  Frank  Anthony  Cummings 

Prof.  S.  Foster  Damon 

Murray  S.  Danforth,  M.D. 

Mrs.  Murray  S.  Danforth 

Mr.  William  C.  Dart 

Mr.  Foster  B.  Davis 

Miss  Mary  Elliott  Davis 

Mrs.  R.  C.  Davis 

Mr.  Charles  J.  Davol 

Mr.  Herbert  R.  Dean 

Mrs.  Thomas  Hart  deCoudres 

Prof.  Edmund  B.  Delabarre 

Mr.  Paul  C.  DeWolf 

Miss  Alice  S.  Dexter 

Miss  Eunice  W.  Dexter 

Mr.  Henry  C.  Dexter 

Mr.  Walter  Frederick  Dickinson 

Miss  Louise  Diman 

Mrs.  Harriet  M.  F.  Dixon 

John  E.  Donley,  M.D. 

Mr.  Michael  F.  Dooley 

Mr.  Louis  W.  Downes 

Mrs.  Louis  W.  Downes 

Mrs.  George  E.  Downing 

Mr.  Robert  T.  Downs 

Mr.  Charles  L.  Drown 

Mr.  David  Duncan 

Mr.  Henry  A.  DuVillard 

Miss  Margarethe  L.  Dwight 

Miss  Anna  Jones  Dyer 

Mr.  H.  Anthony  Dyer 

Mr.  William  Allan  Dyer 

Mr.  Charles  G.  Easton 

Mr.  Frederick  W.  Easton 

Mr.  Alfred  U.  Eddy 


20 


KHOOK    ISLAND   HISTORICAL   SOCIETY 


Mr.  Cyrus  T.  Eddy 
Miss  Isabel  Eddy 
Mr.  William  Holden  Eddy 
Miss  Harriet  C.  Edmonds 
Miss  Edith  Edwards 
Mrs.  Seeber  Edwards 
Mr.  Walter  Angell  Edwards 
Mr.  James  Elgar 
Mr.  Zenas  H.  Ellis 
Mr.  William  Ely 
Mr.  Frank  W.  Emerson 
Mr.  Robert  S.  Emerson 
Mr.  Ralph  C.  Estcs 
Mr.  William  Wood  Estes 
Mrs.  William  Wood  Estes 
Mr.  Charles  Owen  Ethier 
Mr.  Royal  Bailey  Farnum 
Mr.  Walter  F.  Farrell 
Mrs.  Irving  Fisher 
Mr.  Augustus  H.  Fiske 
Mrs.  Charles  Fletcher 
Mr.  Elliot  Flint 
Hon.  William  S.  Flynn 
Mrs.  Lawrence  B.  Fogarty 
Mr.  Allan  Forbes 
Mrs.  George  H.  Fowler 
Mr.  Hovey  T.  Freeman 
Mrs.  John  R.  Freeman 
Mr.  Joseph  W.  Freeman 
Hon.  G.  Frederick  Frost 
Mr.  William  Congdon  Fry 
Mr.  Frederick  H.  Fuller 
Mr.  R.  Clinton  Fuller 
Frank  T.  Fulton,  M.D. 
Mmc.  Annita  Gaburri 
Hon.  Joseph  H.  Gainer 
Mrs.  Robert  Ives  Gammell 
Mr.  William  Gammell 
Mr.  William  Gammell,  Jr. 
Miss  Abbie  P.  Gardner 
George  W.  Gardner,  M.D. 
Prof.  Henry  B.  Gardner 
Mrs.  John  T.  Gardner 
Mr.  Preston  H.  Gardner 
Mr.  Daniel  F.  George 


Mrs.  Louis  C.  Gerry 

Hon.  Peter  G.  Gerry 

Mrs.  Peter  G.  Gerry 

Mrs.  Alice  C.  Gleeson 

Mr.  Robert  H.  I.  Goddard 

Rabbi  Israel  M.  Goldman 

Mr.  George  T.  Gorton 

Mr.  Harry  Hale  Goss 

Mrs.  Richard  Rathborne  Graham 

Mrs.  A.  L.  Grant 

Mr.  Eugene  S.  Graves 

Mrs.  Eugene  S.  Graves 

Miss  Eleanor  B.  Green 

Gov.  Theodore  Francis  Green 

Mr.  Edward  Aborn  Greene 

Miss  Esther  F.  Greene 

Mr.  Thomas  C.  Greene 

Mr.  Ralph  M.  Greenlaw 

Mr.  William  B.  Greenough 

Mr.  Russell  Grinnell 

Mr.  E.  Tudor  Gross 

Mrs.  Harold  J.  Gross 

Mr.  R.  F.  Haffenreffer 

Hon.  J.  Jerome  Hahn 

Mr.  John  W.  Haley 

Miss  Annette  Mason  Ham 

Mrs.  Livingston  Ham 

Mrs.  Albert  G.  Harkness 

Mr.  Gilbert  A.  Harrington 

Mr.  Benjamin  P.  Harris 

Miss  Mary  A.  Harris 

Mr.  Stephen  C.  Harris 

Mrs.  Earl  C.  Hart 

Mr.  Everett  S.  Hartwell 

N.  Darrell  Harvey,  M.D. 

Prof.  William  T.  Hastings 

Mr.  William  A.  Hathaway 

Miss  Caroline  Hazard 

Mr.  Rowland  Hazard 

Mr.  Thomas  G.  Hazard,  Jr. 

Mr.  Charles  F.  Heartman 

Mrs.  W.  E.  Heathcote 

Prof.  James  B.  Hedges 

Mr.  Bcrnon  E.  Helme 

Mr.  John  Hcnshaw 


LIST   OF    MEMBERS 


21 


Mr.  Joseph  G.  Henshaw 
Mr.  Robert  W.  Herrick 
Mr.  G.  Burton  Hibbert 
Mr.  William  A.  Hill 
Mr.  Frank  L.  Hinckley 
Mr.  William  L.  Hodgman 
Mrs.  William  L.  Hodgman 
Mrs.  William  H.  Hoffman 
Mrs.  John  S.  Holbrook 
Mr.  George  J.  Holden  * 

Mrs.  John  W.  Holton 
Mr.  Charles  A.  Horton 
Mrs.  C.  H.  Horton 
Mr.  Frederic  W.  Howe 
Mr.  M.  A.  DeWolfe  Howe 
Mr.  Wallis  E.  Howe 
Mrs.  Richard  G.  Howland 
Mrs.  William  Erwin  Hoy 
Mrs.  George  H.  Huddy,  Jr. 
Mr.  Sidney  D.  Humphrey 
Mr.  Horatio  A.  Hunt 
Mr.  S.  Foster  Hunt 
Mrs.  Duncan  Hunter 
Mr.  George  Hurley 
Mr.  Richard  A.  Hurley 
Mr.  James  Hazen  Hyde 
Mrs.  C.  Oliver  Iselin 
Mr.  Norman  M.  Isham 
Miss  Mary  A.  Jack 
Mr.  Benjamin  A.  Jackson 
Mrs.  Donald  E.  Jackson 
Mr.  Thomas  A.  Jenckes 
Mr.  George  A.  Jepherson 
Mrs.  Edward  L.  Johnson 
George  F.  Johnson,  M.D. 
Mr.  William  C.  Johnson 
Dr.  Lewis  H.  Kalloch 
Mr.  Francis  B.  Keeney 
Mrs.  Ellsworth  L.  Kelley 
Mr.  Howard  R.  Kent 
Mr.  Charles  H.  Keyes 
Mr.  H.  Earle  Kimball 
Eugene  P.  King,  M.D. 
Mrs.  Eugene  P.  King 
Lucius  C.  Kingman,  M.D. 


Mrs.  C.  Prescott  Knight 
Mr.  C.  Prescott  Knight,  Jr. 
Mrs.  C.  Prescott  Knight,  Jr. 
Mr.  Robert  L.  Knight 
Mrs.  Robert  L.  Knight 
Mr.  Russell  W.  Knight 
Mrs.  Webster  Knight 
Prof.  Harry  L.  Koopman 
Mr.  John  Krawczuk 
Mrs.  Henry  S.  Lanpher 
Mrs.  Dana  Lawrence 
Mr.  George  R.  Lawton 
Charles  H.  Leonard,  M.D. 
Miss  Grace  F.  Leonard 
Mrs.  Austin  T.  Levy 
Mr.  Dexter  L.  Lewis 
Mr.  Joseph  W.  Lewis 
Mr.  Ferdinand  A.  Lincoln 
Mrs.  Charles  Warren  Lippitt 
Mr.  Charles  Warren  Lippitt 
Mrs.  Frances  Pomeroy  Lippitt 
Mr.  Gorton  T.  Lippitt 
Hon.  Henry  F.  Lippitt 
Mr.  Arthur  B.  Lisle 
Mrs.  Arthur  B.  Lisle 
Mr.  Alden  L.  Littlefield 
Mrs.  Alden  L.  Littlefield 
Mr.  Charles  W.  Littlefield 
Mr.  Ivory  Littlefield 
Rev.  Augustus  M.  Lord,  D.D. 
Mr.  T.  Robley  Louttit 
Mr.  W.  Easton  Louttit,  Jr. 
Mr.  David  B.  Lovell,  Jr. 
Mr.  Albert  E.  Lownes 
Mr.  Harold  C.  Lyman 
Mr.  Richard  E.  Lyman 
Mr.  William  A.  McAuslan 
Mrs.  William  A.  McAuslan 
Mr.  Kenneth  D.  MacColl 
Mr.  Norman  A.  MacColl 
Mr.  William  B.  MacColl 
Mr.  Arthur  M.  McCrillis 
Miss  Grace  E.  Macdonald 
Mr.  Benjamin  M.  MacDougall 
Mr.  Charles  B.  Mackinney 


22 


RHODE    ISLAND    HISTORICAL    SOCIETY 


Mrs.  Herbert  E.  Maine 
Mrs.  William  L.  Manchester 
Mr.  Charles  C.  Marshall 
Mr.  Edgar  W.  Martin 
Mrs.  John  F.  Marvel 
Mr.  Fletcher  S.  Mason 
Mr.  Harold  Mason 
Mr.  John  H.  Mason 
Mrs.  William  B.  Mason 
Mrs.  George  S.  Mathews 
Mr.  Archibald  C.  Matteson 
Mr.  William  L.  Mauran 
Mrs.  William  L.  Mauran 
Mrs.  Frank  Everitt  Maxwell 
Mr.  Harry  V.  Mayo 
Rev.  Charles  A.  Meader 
Mr.  W.  Granville  Meader 
Mrs.  Charles  H.  Merriman 
Mrs.  E.  Bruce  Merriman 
Mr.  Harold  T.  Merriman 
Mr.  I.  B.  Merriman 
Mrs.  I.  B.  Merriman 
Mrs.  E.  T.  H.  Metcalf 
Mr.  G.  Pierce  Metcalf 
Mr.  Houghton  P.  Metcalf 
Mrs.  I.  Harris  Metcalf 
Hon.  Jesse  H.  Metcalf 
Mrs.  Jesse  H.  Metcalf 
Mr.  Stephen  O.  Metcalf 
Mr.  William  Davis  Miller 
Mrs.  William  Davis  Miller 
Mr.  George  L.  Miner 
Hon.  Louis  Monast 
Mr.  G.  A.  Moriarty,  Jr. 
Mrs.  William  Robert  Morrison 
Mrs.  Bentley  W.  Morse 
Mr.  Jarvis  M.  Morse 
Mr.  Edward  S.  Moulton 
Mrs.  Edward  S.  Moulton 
William  M.  Muncy,  M.D. 
Walter  L.  Munro,  M.D. 
Prof.  Wilfred  H.  Munro 
Mr.  Addison  P.  Munroe 
Mrs.  Addison  P.  Munroe 
Mr.  Walter  M.  Murdie 


Mrs.  James  A.  Nealey 

Mr.  George  P.  Newell 

Mr.  Louis  C.  Newman 

Mrs.  Louis  C.  Newman 

Miss  Eliza  Taft  Newton 

Mr.  Roger  Hale  Newton 

Mr.  Paul  C.  Nicholson 

Mr.  Samuel  M.  Nicholson 

Mr.  Elmer  D.  Nickerson 

Ira  Hart  Noyes,  M.D. 

Miss  Mary  Olcott 

Mrs.  Frank  F.  Olney 

Mr.  Harald  W.  Ost'by 

Mr.  Harry  C.  Owen 

Rev.  Anthony  R.  Parshley 

Mr.  Edmund  H.  Parsons 

Mr.  G.  Richmond  Parsons 

Mrs.  G.  Richmond  Parsons 

Miss  Mary  H.  Parsons 

Mr.  Frederick  S.  Peck 

Mrs.  Frederick  S.  Peck 

Mr.  Horace  M.  Peck 

Mr.  Stephen  I.  Peck 

Mr.  William  H.  Peck 

Mr.  William  T.  Peck 

Mrs.  F.  H.  Peckham 

Katherine  F.  Peckham,  M.D. 

Mr.  Augustus  R.  Peirce 

Mr.  Clarence  E.  Peirce 

Mr.  George  E.  Peirce 

Mrs.  George  E.  Peirce 

Mr.  John  P.  B.  Peirce 

Mr.  Charles  M.  Perry 

Mr.  Howard  B.  Perry 

Rt.  Rev.  James  DeWolf  Perry,  D.D. 

Mr.  Marsden  J.  Perry 

John  M.  Peters,  M.I). 

Mr.  Arthur  L.  Philbrick 

Mr.  Charles  H.  Philbrick 

Mr.  Arthur  S.  Phillips 

Mrs.  Frank  N.  Phillips 

Mr.  Kmi!  G.  Pieper 

Mr.  Byron  A.  Pierce 

Mr.  Thomas  L.  Pierce 

Mr.  Albert  H.  Poland 


LIST  OF  MEMBERS 


23 


Prof.  Albert  K.  Potter 
Dr.  Arthur  M.  Potter 
Mr.  B.  Thomas  Potter 
Mrs.  Dexter  B.  Potter 
Mrs.  T.  I.  Hare  Powel 
Mr.  Howard  W.  Preston 
Mrs.  Howard  W.  Preston 
Mr.  Robert  S.  Preston 
Miss  Evelyn  M.  Purdy 
Helen  C.  Putnam,  M.D. 
Mr.  Patrick  H.  Quinn 
Mrs.  George  R.  Ramsbottom 
Mr.  Walter  E.  Ranger 
Mrs.  C.  K.  Rathbone 
Hon.  Elmer  J.  Rathbun 
Mrs.  Irving  E.  Raymond 
Mrs.  Joseph  H.  Regester 
Mr.  Charles  C.  Remington 
Rhode  Island  State  College 
Mr.  Dana  Rice 
Mr.  Herbert  W.  Rice 
Mr.  John  B.  Richards 
Gen.  John  J.  Richards 
Miss  Louise  Richardson 
Mr.  Henry  Isaac  Richmond 
Mrs.  George  W.  H.  Ritchie 
Mr.  Leonard  M.  Robinson 
Mr.  Louis  E.  Robinson 
Mr.  Robert  Rodman 
Rev.  Arthur  Rogers 
Mr.  Henry  W.  Sackett 
Mr.  Kenneth  Shaw  Safe 
Mrs.  Harold  P.  Salisburv 
Mr.  Henry  Salomon 
Mrs.  G.  Coburn  Sanctuary 
Mrs.  George  C.  Scott 
Mrs.  David  S.  Seaman 
Mr.  Henry  M.  Sessions 
Miss  Ellen  D.  Sharpe 
Mr.  Henry  D.  Sharpe 
Eliot  A.  Shaw,  M.D. 
Mrs.  Frederick  E.  Shaw 
Mrs.  George  St.  J.  Sheffield 
Mr.  Charles  Shepard 
Mr.  Clarence  E.  Sherman 


Mr.  Edward  A.  Sherman 
Mr.  Harry  B.  Sherman 
Mrs.  Arthur  F.  Short 
Mrs.  Philip  B.  Simonds 
Mrs.  Charles  Sisson 
Mrs.  Byron  N.  H.  Smith 
Mrs.  Charles  H.  Smith 
Edgar  B.  Smith,  M.D. 
Mrs.  Edwin  C.  Smith 
Joseph  Smith,  M.D. 
Mr.  Nathaniel  W.  Smith 
R.  Morton  Smith,  M.D. 
Mr.  Walter  B.  Smith 
Mr.  Ward  E.  Smith 
Mrs.  Whitney  Smith 
Mr.  Sylvester  M.  Snow 
Mr.  William  A.  Spicer 
Hon.  Ernest  L.  Sprague 
Mrs.  James  G.  Staton 
Hon.  Charles  F.  Stearns 
Mr.  Thomas  E.  Steere 
Mr.  Oscar  Frank  Stetson 
Mr.  Frederick  A.  Stevens 
Miss  Maud  Lyman  Stevens 
Mr.  Edward  Clinton  St;ness 
Mr.  Henry  Y.  Stites 
Mrs.  Charles  C.  Stover 
Mr.  Charles  T.  Straight 
Mr.  H.  Nelson  Street 
Mr.  Henry  A.  Street 
Mr.  Rush  Sturges 
Hon.  Arthur  P.  Sumner 
Mr.  Frank  H.  Swan 
Hon.  John  W.  Sweeney 
Miss  Louisa  A.  Sweetlanci 
Mr.  Robert  W.  Taft 
Mr.  Royal-  C.  Taft 
Prof.  Will  S.  Taylor 
Benjamin  F.  Tefft,  M.D. 
Mrs.  J.  P.  Thorndike 
Mr.  John  A.  Tillinghast 
Louisa  Paine  Tingley,  M.D. 
Mr.  F.  L.  Titsworth 
Mrs.  William  O.  Todd 
Mrs.  Stacy  Tolman 


24 


RHODE    ISLAND    HISTORICAL    SOCIETY 


Mr.  Frederick  E.  Tripp 

Mr.  William  J.  Tully 

Mrs.  Albert  C.  Tyler 

Mr.  D.  Berkeley  Updike 

Mr.  William  H.  Vanderbilt 

Mr.  William  A.  Viall 

Mrs.  Arthur  M.  Walker 

Mr.  A.  Tingley  Wall 

Mrs.  Maurice  K.  Washburn 

Mr.  Frederick  V.  Waterman 

Mrs.  Lewis  A.  Waterman 

Prof.  Arthur  E.  Watson 

Mr.  Byron  S.  Watson 

Mr.  Edward  L.  Watson 

Mr.  John  J.  Watson 

Mr.  W.  L.  Watson 

Mrs.  William  B.  Weeden 

Mr.  Edward  H.  Weeks 

Mrs.  Edward  H.  Weeks 

Mr.  Richard  Ward  Greene  Welling 

Mr.  John  H.  Wells 


Mr.  Edward  H.  West 

Mr.  Thomas  H.  West,  Jr. 

Mrs.  Elizabeth  Nicholson  White 

Mr.  Willis  H.  White 

Mrs.  Henry  A.  Whitmarsh 

Mr.  Roy  F.  Whitney 

Mr.  Frederick  Bernays  Wiener 

Mr.  Frank  J.  Wilder' 

Mrs.  Elizabeth  K.  Wilkinson 

Mr.  Daniel  L.  Willmarth,  Jr. 

Miss  Amey  L.  Wilson 

Mr.  Percy  J.  Wilson 

Mr.  William  A.  Wing 

Mr.  Wilson  G.  Wing 

Mrs.  George  P.  Winship 

Mrs.  C.  Howard  Wood 

Rev.  William  Worthington 

Mr.  Carlos  G.  Wright 

Mr.  Nathan  M.  Wright 

Mr.  Lawrence  C.  Wroth 

Mr.  Frederick  W.  York 


The  Minutes  of  the  Westconnaug  Purchase 

Transcribed  by  THEODORE  G.  FOSTER 

{Continued  fro/;/  vol.  XXVI,  fage  98) 

By  Virtue  of  the  above  Precept  the  Proprietors  whose 
Names  are  underwritten  met  and  Chose Capt.  Ben- 
jamin Ellery  Moderator  And  appointed  Col  Sylvester 
Richmond  Zuriel  Waterman  and  William  Wanton  a  Com- 
mittee to  inspect  the  Plat"si  that  Col  Daniel  Abbot  pre- 
sented and  adjourned  to  July  3d  at  Eight  in  the  Morning 

July  the  3d  1734  According  to  Adjournment  the 

Proprietors  underwritten  met Voted  that  Capt 

Thomas  Harris  have  a  piece  of  Land  about  Thirteen  Acres 
adjoining  on  Nicholas  Harris  and  Samuel  Winsor  it  being 
in  Line  of  Lawrince  Springer 

Half  Share  Head  Lot  not  laid  out  to  him  said  Springer  on 
the  Colony  Line 

l8The  original  of  this  plat  is  in  the  office  of  the  Town  Clerk  of  Foster. 
There  is  .i  copj   in  the  R.  I.  H.  S.  Library,  R.  1.  .Atlas  XI 11,  pages  1-4. 


WESTCONNAUG  25 

The  Committee  then  returned  with  the  Plat  and  re- 
ported that  there  was  little  or  no  Difference  between  this 
and  that  of  the  First  Division  Second  Division  as  to  Quan- 
tity of  Land 

Voted  that  said  Plat  is  received,  which  Plat  bears 
Date  July  the  Second  1 734  and  is  called  Col  Abbots  Second 
Plat 

Voted  that  Col.  Abbdts  Ace*  of  £3 1  .  .  0  .  be 

allowed  -    £31  .  .  10 

Voted  that  Capt.  Thomas  Harris  Ace*  of 

£10  .  .  10  be  allowed  10  .  .  10 

Voted  that  Thomas  Parkers  Ace1  of  £9  .  .  6  .  . 

be  allowed    ------------9. .6 

Voted  that  Thos  Angell  Ace'  of  £8  ..  14  be 

allowed  8  .  .  14 

Voted  that  Ishmall  Spinks  Ac'  of  £12  ..  0  be 

allowed  12 

Voted  that  James  Shertons  Ace'    be      allowed  6 

The  Account  brought  from  the  other  Side  £72  .  .  6 
Voted  that  Joseph  Knight  Account  be  allowed  .  .  .  8  .  .  9 
Voted  that  Zachariah  Rhodes  Ace'  of  Seventeen 

Pounds  Ten  Shillings  be  allowed  deducting 

Six  Pounds  11  .  .  10 

Voted  that  Major  James  Brown  Ace'  be  allowed  6 
Voted  that  Cap4  Benja  Ellerys  Ace'  be  allowed  .  .  4 
Voted  that  Major  Job  Greenes  Account  be 

allowed  for  Service  6 

Voted  that  Ishmall  Spinks  Ace'  of  Twenty  one  be 

allowed  deducting  Six  Pounds  Ten  Shillings   1 5 


£123.5 


Voted  that  Zuriel  Waterman  demand  the  original  Agree- 
ment between  Providence  and  Westquanaug  and  forthwith 
to  put  the  same  on  Record  in  the  Town  Clerks  office  in 


26  RHODE  ISLAND  HISTORICAL  SOCIETY 

Providence  and  also  to  put  it  on  Record  in  Scituate  in  the 
Town  Clerks  office  and  that  said  Waterman  be  allowed 
Twenty  Shillings  for  his  Trouble. 

Voted  that  the  Four  Parcels  of  Land  that  appear  to  be 
undivided  in  Col0,  Abbots  Plat  dated  July  2d  1  734  Quan- 
tity /viz/  451  Acres  263  D°  62  D°  284  D°  to  be  sold 
forthwith  to  the  highest  bidder  there 

And  that  the  Clerk  of  the  Proprietors  Major  Greene 
give  Deeds  for  the  same  taking  Bonds  in  his  own  Name  for 
the  use  of  the  Proprietors 

Voted  that  William  Wanton  Junr  Sell  the  undivided 
Land  above  to  the  highest  Bidder  forthwith  among  the 
Proprietors  and  their  Representatives  now  convened  which 
accordingly  was  done  and 
Joseph  Rhodes  bought  263 

Nicholas  Carr  bought  284  said  Rhodes  to  give  one  Hun- 
dred and  Three  pounds  and  said  Carr  to  give  One  Hundred 
and  Ten  pounds  Major  Job  Greene  bought  451  .  for  one 
Hundred  and  Sixty  Nine  pounds Col°  Sylvester  Rich- 
mond 62  for  Twenty  Two  pounds 

For  as  much  as  Major  Job  Greene  has  purchased  451. 
It  is  Voted  that  Capt  Benjamin  Ellery  Give  a  Deed  to  said 
Greene  of  said  Purchase  taking  a  Bond  in  his  own  Name  for 
the  use  of  the  Proprietors  .   .   . 

Voted  that  there  be  Two  Plats  drawn  by  Zuriel  Water- 
man from  Col0-  Abbots  Plat  date  July  2'L  1734  and  one  of 
them  to  be  lodged  at  Newport  and  one  in  Providence  and 
the  Original  in  Scituate  and  all  to  be  recorded  in  each  Town 
Clerks  office  ....  Mr  Zuriel  Waterman  to  see  the  orig- 
inal Recorded  in  Scituate  That  at  Newport  by  Benjamin 
Ellery  and  That  at  Providence  by  said  Waterman  and  the 
whole  to  be  paid  by  the  Clerk  of  the  Proprietors  as  soon  as 
he  shall  receive  the  Money  for  the  undivided  Land  sold  to 
Joseph  Rhodes  Nicholas  Carr  Major  Job  Greene  Col0  Syl- 
vester Richmond 


WESTCONNAUG                                                   27 

Dr  The  Proprietors  of  Westquanaug   .   .   .          Contra  Credit 

To  Sundry  Accounts      £123  .     5  . 

Bv  Lands  Sold  Joseph 

To  Zuriel  Waterman             1  .  .  0 

Rhodes                                £103.0 

To  Zuriel  Waterman  for 

By  D°  to  Nich.  Carr  .  .        110.0 

Platts                                     5  .  . 

By  D°  Major  Job  Green       169. 

To       Deeds  at                               16 

By  D°  Col°  Richmond    .          22 

130  ..  1 

£404 

Due  to  the  Proprietors     273  .  .  19 

£404*.  .  0 
Voted  that  Zuriel  Waterman  be  paid  by  the  Clerk  Five 
pounds  for  the  Drawing  and  Compleating  the  Two  Plats 
Voted  that  the  Clerk  pay  to  all  whole  Share  man  in  pro- 
portionable part  of  the  Money  which  the  undivided  Land 
sold  for  as  soon  as  the  Money  comes  into  his  Hands  others 
in  in  Proportion 

Voted  that  there  be  a  Book  bought  at  the  Charge  of  the 
Proprietors -to  transcribe  these  Records  as  the  Clerk  shall 
think  proper 

Voted  that  what  has  passed  shall  be  binding  to  all  the 
Proprietors  their  Heirs  and  Assigns  forever 

Voted  that  the  former  Committee  be  still  a  Committee 
till  further  orders  also  the  clerk 

Voted  that  this  Meeting  be  dissolved  and  it  is  hereby 
pr  Order  Job  Greene  Clerk 

At  a  Meeting  of  the  Proprietors  of  the  Westquanaug 
Purchase  held  by  Adjournment  at  the  House  of  Jeremish 
Angell  Esq  in  Scituate  on  the  First  Monday  in  April  which 
is  on  the  Second  Day  of  said  Month  AD  1770 
Thomas  Hill  Moderator 

Whereas  at  a  Meeting  of  the  above  said  Proprietors  held 
at  the  House  of  Mr.  Peter  Cooke  in  Scituate  on  the  First 
Tuesday  of  November  last  it  was  votd  and  orderd  that  the 
Clerk  should  make  a  New  Book  and  transcribe  in  the 
Original  Records  of  the  Westquanaug  Purchase  - 
They   being    of    long    Standing   and    some    what    worne 


28  RHODE  ISLAM)  HISTORICAL  SOCIETY 

Therefor  the  Clerk  according:  to  order   hath   trans- 


cribed the  same  and  they  being  read  and  examined  at  the 
aforesaid  Meeting  on  the  Second  Day  of  April  A  D  177Q 
and  found  to  be  a  true  Transcript  of  the  Original  Records 
of  the  aforesaid  Purchase 

Therefore  Voted  that  the  aforesaid  Transcript  Records 
is  Received  and  accepted  of  by  the  aforesaid  Proprietors  to 
be  valid  and  of  equal  force  with  the  original.  -  And  this  is 
the  same  transcribed  Book  as  aforesaid 

Test  Thomas  Brown  Proprietors  Clerk 

The  above  preceeding  Eleven  Pages  contain  a  true  Copy 
from  Mr  Thomas  Browns  Transcript  of  the  Records  of  the 
Proprietors  of  the  Westquanaug  Purchase  as  certified  by 
him  ....  Copied  by  Me  into  this  Book  Since  Sat- 
urday Morning  Last  when  I  began  this  Copy  and  finished 
it  on  Monday  Afternoon  November  8th  A  D  1813  .  . 
Mr  Fleet  Brown  Son  of  the  above  namd  Thomas  Brown 
who  is  now  the  Clerk  of  the  Proprietors  Lent  the  said 

Records  to  Me Said  Fleet  Brown  being 

Grandson  of  Major  James  Brown  Who  was  appointed  one 
of  the  New  Committee  July  14th  1715  .  .  .  Mr  Fleet 
Brown  informs  that  his  Grand  Father  married  Three  Times 
to  Judith  Fleet  to  Katherine  Greene  and  " 
Mr  Fleet  Brown  passed  a  considerable  part  of  this  after- 
noon with  Me,  at  my  House,  in  Foster  .  .  .  being 
present  when  Mr  James  Durfey  called  and  informed  of 
the  Death  of  Mr  Amos  Hammond  in  the  78th  Year  of  his 
Age  one  of  my  Neighbours  who  died  yesterday  a  worthy 
Industrious  Man  .  .  .  This  is  Written  a  Little  before 
the  Setting  of  the  Sun  Monday  Afternoon  November  8th 
1813 
pr  Theodore  Foster 

At  a  Meeting  of  the  Proprietors  and  Owners  of  the 
Lands  in  the  Westquanaug  Purchase  so  called  at  the  House 

'''The  third  name  was  left  out  hv  Mr.  Foster. 


WESTCONNAUG  29 

of  Peter  Cooke  Innholder  in  Scituate  within  said  Purchase 
on  the  24th  Day  of  October  A  D  1 768  .  .  By  Virtue  of  a 
Warrant  at  the  Request  of  Sundry  of  the  Proprietors  of  the 
Purchase  aforesaid  Signed  by  Thomas  Hill  of  Scituate 
abovesaid  Esq  .  .  said  Warrant  is  Dated  Oct0.  4.  1768 
Thomas  Hill  Chosen  Moderator  of  this  Meeting 
Thomas  Brown  chosen  Proprietors  Clerk  and  engaged 

Voted  that  the  Clerk  keep  the  Original  Records  of  said 
Proprietors  and  is  hereby  empowered  to  give  authenticate 
copies  thereof  under  his  Hand 

Voted  that  the  Clerk  give  Notes  in  the  Providence 
Gazette' "'  '  Three  Weeks  before  the  First  Monday  in  April 
next.  .  .  That  the  Proprietors  choose  a  Committee  & 
Surveyor  for  said  Purchase  and  to  transact  any  other  neces- 
sary Matters  relative  to  said  Purchase 

Voted  that  the  aforesaid  Meeting  be  adjourned  to  the 
First  Monday  in  April  next  at  the  House  of  Jeremiah 
Angell  Esq  in  said  Scituate  at  Ten  °Clock  on  said  Day 
Thomas  Brown  Proprietors  Clerk 

At  a  Meeting  of  the  Proprietors  of  the  Westquanaug 
Purchase  held  by  Adjournment  at  the  Hous  of  Jeremiah 
Angell  Esq  on  the  First  Monday  of  April  A  D  1769 

Thomas  Hill  chosen  Moderator 
Voted  that  Capt  Andrew  Angell  be  a  Surveyor  for  said 
Purchase 

Voted  that  Capt  Christopher  Relp  Thomas  Hill  Esq  and 
Mr  Peter  Cook  be  a  committee  for  said  Purchase 
Voted  that  the  original  Warrant  for  having  a  Proprietors 
Meeting  be  put  upon  Record  in  the  Proprietors  Clerks 
Office 

Voted  by  this  Meeting  that  as  the  original  Plat  of  the 
Westquanaug  Purchase  was  not  accepted  by  the  original 
Proprietors  to  allow  any  of  the  Original  Bounds  made  by 
the  Surveyors  and  Committee  of  said  Purchase But 

20This  advertisement  appeared  in  the  Providence  Gazette  of  March 
11,  18,  and  25,  1769. 


30  RHODE  ISLAM)  HISTORICAL  SOCIETY 

the  true  intent  and  Meaning  of  the  Original  Plat  was  and 
is  to  establish  the  Original  Bounds  made  in  said  Pur- 
chase      

Voted  that  this  Meeting  do  and  has  acepted  of  the  Plat 
aforesaid  in  the  Manner  and  Form  above  described 

Test  Thomas  Brown  Proprietors  Clerk 

Voted  that  the  original  Plat  be  requested  out  of  the 
Possession  of  Gidion  Harris  Esq  and  delivered  to  Capt 
Thomas  Relph  and  Mr  Peter  Cooke  who  are  chosen  a 
Committee  to  receive  the  same  and  deliver  in  to  Thomas 
Brown  Clerk  of  Said  Purchase 

By  a  Vote  of  this  Meeting  the  said  Meeting  adjourned 
to  the  First  Tuesday  in  Nov:  next  at  the  Hous  of  Mr  Peter 
Cook  Innholder  in  Scituate  in  said  Purchase  at  Twelve 
°Clock  in  said  Day 

Test  Thomas  Brown  Proprietors 

Clerk 

Whereas  a  Request  hath  been  made  to  Me  the 

L  S.     Subscriber  by  William  Rhodes  Benjamin  Wright 

Thomas  Relph  Robert  Potter  James  Thornton 

and  Sundry  others  of  the  Proprietors  and  owners 

of  the  Westquanaug  Purchase  (so  called)  that  a  Warrant 

be  issued  to  Notify  the  Proprietors  and  Owners  of  said 

Purchase  to  meet  together  at  the  Dwelling  House  of  Mr 

Peter  Cook  Innholder  at  Ten  "Clock  in  the  Forenoon  of 

Said  Day: 

Providence  to  wit  To  the  Town  Serjeant  or  others 
of  the  Constables  in  the  Town  of  Scituate  in  the  County 
of  Providence    .... 

Greeting 

You  are  hereby  in  his  Majesty's  Name  George  the 

Third  King  of  Great  Britain  &c  required  to  warn  and  give 

timely  Notice  to  all  the  Proprietors  and  owners  of  the 

Westquanaug  Purchase  (so  called)  That  they  meet  at  the 


WESTCONNAUG  31 

Dwelling  House  of  Mr  Peter  Cook  Innholder  in  Scituate 
in  said  Purchase  abovesaid  on  Monday  this  Twenty  fourth 
Day  of  this  Instant  October  at  Ten  of  the  Clock  in  the 
Forenoon  in  said  Day  then  and  there  to  make  Choice  of  a 
Clerk  for  the  Proprietors  and  Owners  of  the  Purchase  of 
abovesaid  and  also  to  take  into  Consideration  the  Dispute 
and  Disagreement  there  is  between  the  Bounds  of  the  Lots 
and  the  Plat  of  the  Purchase  abovesaid  and  like  wise  to  act 
and  transact  such  other  Business  as  shall  be  by  them  thought 
needful  Hereof  fail  not  but  true  Return  make  with  your 
Doings  there  or  given  at  the  time  &  place  abovesaid  Given 
under  my  Hand  &  Seal  at  Scituate  aforesaid  the  Fourth 
Day  of  October  in  the  Eighth  Year  of  the  Said  Majestys 
Reign  AD  1768 

Thomas  Hill  Justice  of  the  Peace 

Pursuant  to  the  above  Warrant  I  have  give  timely  Notice 
to  the  above  Proprietors  as  Witness  my  Hand  this  24th 
Day  of  October  A  D  1768 

pr       Josiah  Herrinton  Constable 

Officer  Fees  [illegible]  at  Seven  Shillings 

May  the  24th  1 769  The  above  and  foregoing  Warrant  is  a 

true  copy  of  the  Original 

Test  Thomas  Brown  Proprietors  Clerk 

At  a  Meeting  of  the  Proprietors  of  the  Westquanaug  Pur- 
chase held  by  adjournment  at  the  House  of  Peter  Cook 
Innholder  in  Scituate  in  said  Purchase  on  the  First  Tuesday 
of  November  A  D  1769    .     . 

Thomas  Hill  Moderator 

Charles  Harris  Esq  is  chosen  Surveyor  in  said  Purchase  in 
the  Room  of  Capt  Andrew  Angell  who  refused  and  also 
the  former  Committee  are  continued 

Voted  that  the  Clerk  transcribe  the  original  Records 
in  said  Purchase  in  a  Book  suitable  for  the  same  which  he 
is  to  deliver  to  the  next  Proprietors  Meeting  for  their 
Approbation     . 


32  RHODE    ISLAM)    HISTORICAL    SOCIETY 

This  Meeting  is  adjournd  to  Jeremiah  Angells 
Esq  in  Scituate  on  the  First  Monday  in  April  next 
at   12  "Clock  in  said  Day 

per  Order  Thomas  Brown  Proprietors  clerk 

At  a  Meeting  of  the  Proprietors  of  the  Westquanaug  Pur- 
chase held  by  adjournment  at  the  House  of  Jeremiah 
Angell  Esq  in  Scituate  on  the  First  Monday  in  April  on 
the  Second  Day  of  said  Month  A  D  1770.' 

Thomas  Hill  Moderator 

Whereas  at  a  Meeting  of  said  Proprietors  held  at  the 
House  of  Peter  Cooke  in  Scituate  on  the  First  Tuesday  in 
November  it  was  votd  and  orderd  that  the  Clerk  should 
make  a  New  Book  and  transcribe  the  original  Records  of 
the  Westquanaug  Purchase  they  being  of  a  long  Standing 
and  Some  worn  therefore  the  Clerk  according  to  order 
hath  transcribed  the  same  and  they  being  read  and  exam- 
ined at  the  above  said  Meeting  on  the  Second  Day  of  April 
A  D  1  770  are  found  to  be  a  true  Transcript  of  the  original 
Records  of  said  Purchase  Therefore  Voted  that  the  afore- 
said Transcribed  Record  is  received  and  accepted  by  the 
aforesaid  Proprietors  to  be  valid  and  of  equal  Form  with 
the  Original 

Voted  that  Mr  William  West  and  Thomas  Hill  Esq 
or  either  of  them  be  a  Committee  to  enquire  after  the 
Thirteen  Papers  mentiond  in  the  Original  Records  of  said 
Purchase  and  receive  the  same  and  deliver  them  to  the 
Proprietors  of  the  aforesaid  Purchase 

This  Meeting  is  adjourned  to  the  First  Monday  in 
October  next  which  is  on  the  First  Day  of  said  Month  at 
1  0  °Clock  in  the  Forenoon  in  said  Day  at  the  House  of 
Capt  Peter  Cook  in  Scituate  in  said  Purchase 

Test  Thos  Brown  Proprietors  Clerk 


Just issued ,  1933 

The  CORRESPONDENCE 
of  ESEK  HOPKINS 

First  Commander-in-Chief  of  the  United  States  Navy 


'  I  VHE  correspondence  of  the  first  commander-in-chief  of  the 
■*■    United  States  Navy  throws  much  light  on  the  very  beginning 
of  our  navy,  and  contains  letters  from  many  persons  prominent  in 
public  life  in  those  times. 

Ever>'  student  of  naval  affairs,  and  every  person  interested  in 
the  United  States  Navy  will  find  much  of  interest  and  value  in 
this  volume.  As  a  source  reference  book  on  American  history, 
and  on  the  development  of  our  navy,  this  book  deserves  a  place 
on  the  shelves  of  all  American  historical  libraries. 

It  is  published  by  the  Rhode  Island  Historical  Society  from 
the  original  manuscripts  in  its  library,  as  a  volume  of  101  pages 
with  an  introduction  by  William  Davis  Miller,  in  a  limited  edition 
of  200  copies.  The  price  is  $2.50  post  paid.  This  volume  completes 
the  series. 

Special  Price  to  Members  $2.00 


Roger  Williams  Press         HA»  E-  a-  Johnson  Co 


providence 


Rhode    Island 

Historical  Society 

Collections 


Vol.  XXVII 


APRIL,   1934 


•'^.. 


No.  2 


r                                                       } 

::..:■::■■.  ^^ 

SADDLE  AND  PILLION  ON  WHICH   LAFAYETTE  RODE  IN   COMPANY 

WITH   MISS  ABIGAIL  HAZARD  WHEN  ON  A  VISIT  TO  THE  HOME  OF 

HER  FAMILY  IN  THE  SOUTH   COUNTY. 

Now  in  the  Society's  Museum. 


Issued  Quarterly 


68  Waterman  Street,  Providence,  Rhode  Island 


CONTENTS 


PAGE 

Lafayette's  Saddle  Cover 

Fox  Hunting  in  Colonial  Rhode  Island 

by  William  Davis  Miller      ....  33 

Goddard  Clock  .  .  .  .  .  .  37 

The  Dee  River  of  1583 

by  William  B.  Goodwin        .  .  .  .  38 

Indian  beads      .......  45 

Counterfeiting  in  Colonial  Days 

by  Edward  H.  West 50 

Roger  Williams'  Funeral  ....  54 

New  Publications  of  Rhode  Island  Interest  .  54 

Lafayette's  overshoes  and  a  Lafayette  medal  .  .  55 

New  Members  .  .  .  .  .  .  56 

Lafayette  Centenary  .  .  .  •  •  •  56 

The  Westconnaug  Purchase 

by  Theodore  G.  Foster         ....  57 

Treasurer's  report       .  .  .  .  .  •  61 


RHODE 
HISTORICAL 


ISLAND 

SOCIETY 


COLLECTIONS 


Vol.  XXVII 


APRIL,   1934 


No.  2 


H.  Anthony  Dyer,  President         Gilbert  A.  Harrington,  Treasurer 
Howard  W.  Preston,  Secretary  Howard  M.  Chapin,  Librarian 


The  Society  assumes  no  responsibility  for  the  statements  or  the  opinions 
of  contributors. 


Fox  Hunting  in  Colonial  Rhode  Island 

By  William  Davis  Miller 

In  a  paper  recently  read  before  the  American  Antiquarian 
Society,1  I  considered  at  some  length  the  lack  of  historical 
evidence  in  support  of  the  tradition  that  the  fox  was  hunted 
with  "hound  and  horn"  in  the  Narragansett  Country  and 
upon  the  island  of  Rhode  Island  in  Colonial  days.  Since 
then,  the  tradition  having  again  been  presented  as  a  fact,2  it 
seems  proper  that  reasons  against  the  acceptance  of  this 
legend  as  a  fact  should  once  more  be  recited. 

In  the  Narragansett  Country  this  legend  is  based  wholly 
upon  tradition,  and  a  careful  survey  of  contemporary  rec- 
ords, diaries  and  letters  produce  not  the  slightest  indication 
that  fox  hunting  in  the  approved  British  manner  was  ever 

xAt  the  meeting  held  in  Boston  in  April,  1933. 

-New fort,  the  Cradle  of  American  S forts,  a  paper  read  by  Maud  Howe 
Elliott,  printed  in  the  Bulletin  of  the  Newport  Historical  Society,  Octo- 
ber, 1933. 


34  RHODE    ISLAND    HISTORICAL    SOCIETY 

enjoyed  by  the  Planters  of  that  district.  There  are  but  few 
references  to  dogs  in  the  inventories,  and  not  a  word  of  such 
a  valuable  asset  as  a  pack  is  mentioned  in  any  document. 
There  is,  furthermore,  not  a  single  mention  of  an  organized 
hunt,  nor  of  a  hunt  in  any  form,  in  letters  or  in  diaries  of  the 
period.  That  the  fox  was  hunted  is  not  to  be  questioned,  for 
the  depredations  made  upon  the  barnyard  fowls  of  the 
landholders  could  not  have  been  allowed  to  pass  without 
reprisals,  but  such  hunting  would  appear  to  have  been  car- 
ried on  in  the  modern  South  County  method  with  dog 
and  gun. 

The  present  belief  that  fox  hunting  as  a  sport  was  a  pas- 
time of  the  Narragansett  Planters  may  have  had  its  origin 
in  two  known  references  accepted  without  due  examination 
or  consideration,  and  from  which  it  might  appear  that  the 
hunt  was  enjoyed  on  the  island  of  Rhode  Island.  Dean 
Berkeley,  later  to  be  Bishop  of  Cloyne,  came  to  the 
island  in  the  year  1728.  There  at  his  house  Whitehall,  he- 
wrote  a  series  of  philosophical  dialogues  which  he  entitled 
Mciphron;  or  The  Minute  Philosopher.  In  the  opening 
portion  of  the  Fifth  Dialogue'  occur  these  sentences  upon 
which  the  fox  hunting  legend  is  mainly  based:  "But  we  had 
hardly  seated  ourselves  and  looked  about  us  when  we  saw  a 
fox  by  the  foot  of  our  mount  run  into  an  adjecent  thicket.  A 
few  minutes  after,  we  heard  a  confused  noise  of  the  opening 
of  hounds,  and  winding  of  horns,  and  the  roaring  of  country 
squires."  As  the  description  of  "our  mount"  given  by  Berke- 
ley and  the  view  to  be  seen  from  its  place  is  without  question 
Honeyman's  Hill,  it  is  understandable  to  suppose  that  a 
hunt  was  actually  in  progress  in  the  immediate  vicinity. 
Unfortunately  for  those  who  would  desire  to  produce  this  as 
evidence  of  their  contention  that  this  was  what  Berkeley 
himself  saw,  a  further  and  careful  examination  of  Alciphron 

''The  Works  of  George  Berkeley,  etc.,  Alexander  Campbell  Fraser, 
Oxford,  1901,  vol.  II,  p.  194.  Recently  this  reference  to  fox  hunting  was 
quoted  as  from  a  letter  from  Berkeley  to  a  friend.  If  this  was  true  it  would 
have  turned  the  tables,  but  as  it  is,  it  is  a  serious  error. 


FOX   HUNTING  35 

discloses  the  fact  that  while  Berkeley  made  use  of  the  lovely 
scenery  adjacent  to  Whitehall  as  the  setting  for  the  philo- 
sophical meditations  of  Crito  and  his  friends,  their  conserva- 
tion and  mental  attitude  show  clearly  that  they  considered 
themselves  in  England  and  not  a  great  distance  from 
London  and  further  that  their  actions  and  the  actions  of 
those  about  them  were  those  of  Englishmen  at  home.4  Un- 
fortunately, apparently  to  substantiate  this  mistaken  belief 
that  the  hunt  actually  occurred  near  Newport,  a  belief 
which  Fraser  himself  would  seem  to  have  shared,  a  footnote 
is  appended  to  this  colorful  account  stating:  "This  spirited 
picture  of  a  fox  chase  is  characteristic  of  Rhode  Island  when 
Berkeley  lived  there.  See  my  Life  and  Letters  of  Berkeley 
(1871  ),  p.  159.""  On  examination  the  passage  referred  to 
in  this  note  discloses  simply  these  words:  "And  the  fox 
chase,  with  hounds  and  horns,  as  well  as  fishing  and  fowling, 
were  favorite  sports  in  Narragansett."  Fraser,  from  his  own 
account,  apparently  secured  his  description  of  the  country- 
side and  life  in  Narragansett  and  the  island  of  Rhode  Island 
by  correspondence,  and  his  informant  in  Narragansett  was 
one  who  upheld  the  fox  hunting  legend  simply  by  statement 
and  not  with  proof. 

There  is,  however,  further  evidence  to  be  examined.  A 
later  account  of  life  in  Newport,  during  the  Revolutionary 
period,  contains,  mainly  because  of  erroneous  juxtaposition 
in  the  text,  added  fuel  to  the  fire  which,  fortunately,  can  be 
effectively  extinguished.  In  the  second  volume  of  France 
and  New  England*  the  memoirs  or  journal  of  Louis,  Baron 
de  Closen,  or  Von  Closen,  one  of  Rochambeau's  aides  and  a 
Captain  in  the  Royal  Deux  Ponts  regiment,  is  quoted  with 
reference  to  his  impressions  while  in  Newport.  Among  other 


4This  conclusion  is  upheld  by  Canon  Luce  of  Trinity  College,  Dublin, 
a  recent  visitor  to  Rhode  Island  in  connection  with  his  studies  relative  to 
Bishop  Berkeley. 

5Further,  and  similar,  mention  is  made  on  p.  169. 

''Allen  Forbes  and  Paul  F.  Cadman,  State  Street  Trust  Co.,  Boston, 
1927,  p.  45. 


36  RHODE  ISLAND  HISTORICAL  SOCIETY 

excerpts  from  the  journal  with  reference  to  the  beauty  of 
the  ladies,  and  the  customs  of  the  residents  is  found  the  fol- 
lowing: "through  the  woods,  accompanied  by  twenty  horse- 
men. We  have  forced  more  than  thirty  foxes;  the  packs  of 
hounds  owned  by  these  sportsmen  are  perfect." 

From  the  context  it  is  quite  natural  to  believe  that  de 
Closen  was  referring  to  his  visit  in  Newport  and  the  numer- 
ous pleasures  he  enjoyed,  but  because  of  a  strong  conviction 
that  the  chase  was  not  a  sport  near  Newport,  a  suspicion 
arose  that  this  reference  was  from  a  different  portion  of  his 
journal,  which  led  to  the  request  that  an  examination  be 
made  of  the  manuscript  copy  in  the  Library  of  Congress.7 
Through  the  courtesy  of  J.  F.  Jameson,  Chief  of  the  Divi- 
sion of  Manuscripts,  this  was  done  and  it  was  found  that, 
while  the  sentences  quoted  in  France  and  New  England 
were  accurately  translated,  the  quotation,  had  it  been  con- 
tinued two  sentences  further,  would  have  thrown  an  entirely 
different  light  on  the  question.  After  a  long  sentence  with 
reference  to  the  type  of  fox  and  its  seeming  lack  of  stamina, 
the  next  sentence  begins:  "Les  environs  de  Williamsburg 
favorisent  bien  cette  maniere  de  chasser  ..."  So  that  it  was 
not  in  the  neighborhood  of  Newport,  but  of  Williamsburg, 
Virginia,  where  fox  hunting  had  long  been  enjoyed,  that 
Rochambeau  and  his  aide  followed  the  hounds8  and  found 
the  packs  perfect  though  the  fox  was  weak. 

Therefore,  until  a  contemporary  diary,  letter  or  record 
comes  to  light  and  in  which  definite  mention  is  made  of  the 
sport  in  the  Colony  of  Rhode  Island,  the  pleasing  tradition 
of  a  pastime  of  the  Squires  of  Newport  and  the  Planters  of 
Narragansett  must  reluctantly  be  believed  a  myth.  This 


"This  manuscript  copy  was  made  by  Worthington  C.  Ford,  Esqr.,  but 
unfortunately,  due  to  the  restrictions  imposed  by  the  owners  of  the  orig- 
inal, it  cannot  be  published.  The  quotation  under  discussion  appears  on 
page  29  of  the  second  volume  of  the  manuscript  in  the  Library  of  Congress. 

8J.  J.  Jusserand,  in  his  With  Americans  of  Past  and  Present  Days,  p.  99, 
also  refers  to  de  Closcn's  mention  of  the  fox  hunt  and  he  also  omits  the 
reference  to  Williamsburg. 


Goddard  Clock 

Bequeathed  to  the  Society  by  C.  Pre'scott  Knight. 


38  RHODE  ISLAM)  HISTORICAL  SOCIETY 

reluctance  was  recently  expressed  by  an  antiquarian,  a  New 
Englander  living  in  Virginia,  when  after  careful  research 
being  unable  to  prove  what  he  wished,  he  wrote:  "They 
must  have  used  guns  after  all !  " 


The  Dec  River  of  1583 

(  Now  called  Narragansett  Bay  ) 
and  Its  Relation  to  Nornmbega 

By  William  B.  Goodwin 

In  a  paper  read  before  the  December  12,  1933,  meeting 
of  the  Rhode  Island  Historical  Society  entitled  "The  Truth 
Concerning  Norumbega"  as  to  both  its  meaning  and  its 
actual  location,  a  part  of  the  proof  as  to  where  the  river,  the 
cape,  the  country  and  the  Indian  trading  town  were  all 
actually  located  is  taken  from  a  document  preserved  in  the 
British  Record  Office,  excerpts  from  which  follow  here- 
after. This  document  is  a  grant  by  indenture  from  Sir 
Humphrey  Gilbert  to  Sir  George  Peckham  and  his  son, 
George  Peckham,  dated  the  last  day  of  February  1583, 
and  acknowledged  before  Queen  Elizabeth,  March  1,  of 
the  same  year  and  enrolled  July  1st. 

There  is  a  still  further  agreement1  between  Sir  Hum- 
phrey Gilbert  and  Sir  Thomas  Gerrard  and  Sir  George 
Peckham,  excerpts  from  which  follow.  In  these  two  docu- 
ments there  is  a  definite  description  of  land,  of  a  river,  of 
islands  within  that  river,  and  a  section  of  land  amounting 
to  fifteen  hundred  thousand  acres,  lying  next  west  to  the 
five  islands  within  the  bay  and  river  along  the  sea  coast. 


'Through  the  courtesy  of  Mr.  Goodwin,  a  copy  of  this  document  is  on 
file  in  the  library  of  the  Rhode  Island  Historical  Society. 


THE  DEE  RIVER  OF   1583  39 

Inasmuch  as  there  has  been  no  attempt  to  properly  locate 
the  River  of  Norumbega — although  there  have  been  some 
writers  who  have  suggested  that  the  Cape  of  Norumbega  is 
no  other  than  Cape  Cod — the  casual  reader  of  these  two 
documents  had  no  means  of  knowing  where  this  distinct 
allotment  of  land  to  Sir  George  Peckham,  his  son  George 
and  to  Sir  Thomas  Gerrard  actually  lay  along  our  sea  coast. 
However,  all  the  information  that  Sir  Humphrey  and  his 
fellow  adventurers  or"in  fact  anybody  in  England  knew  in 
the  year  1583  concerning  our  coast  between  Cape  Breton 
and  Spanish  Florida,  was  obtained  for  them  at  the  behest  of 
Queen  Elizabeth  and  at  her  expense  through  Dr.  John  Dee 
who  went  to  Europe  for  that  purpose,  travelling  exten- 
sively, and  who  also  was  to  himself  receive  a  very  broad 
grant  above  a  certain  parallel  of  latitude  in  payment  for  his 
services. 

In  these'documents  there  are  references  which  give  us  the 
key  as  to  where  this  land  actually  was  to  be  set  off  to  the 
backers  of  Sir  Humphrey  Gilbert  for  their  money  in  ad- 
vance to  fit  out  his  expeditions,  for  it  distinctly  speaks  of 
the  John  Dee  Bay  and  River  with  five  islands  in  it.  John 
Dee  made  two  maps — one  of  them  for  Queen  Elizabeth, 
and  one  of  them  for  Sir  Humphrey  Gilbert — and  his  map 
of  North  America  does  not  contain  on  it  any  reference  to  the 
John  Dee  Bay  and  River,  nor  to  the  five  islands,  but  the 
scribe  who  wrote  this  indenture  between  Sir  Humphrey 
Gilbert  and  his  backers  shows  that  Sir  Humphrey  grants — 
"all  that  ryver  or  porte  called,  by  Master  John  Dee,  Dee 
Ryver  which  Ryver  by  the  discripcon  of  John  Verarzanus, 
a  Florentyne,  lyeth  in  Septontrionall  latitude  about  fortye 
twoo  degrees  and  has  his  mouth  lyinge  open  to  the  south 
halfe  a  league  broade  .  .  .  conteyneth  in  it  selfe  five  small 
Islandes  newlie  named  the  Cinque  Isles." 

By  means  of  this  description  we  know  that  Narragansett 
Bay  containing  its  five  islands  is  intended,  for  we  know  that 
Verrazano  described  but  two  rivers  in  all  his  journey  from 
South  Carolina  to  Labrador- — the  one  the  Hudson  and  the 


40  RHODE    ISLAND    HISTORICAL    SOCIETY 

other  the  Bay  of  Refuge,  where  he  had  refitted  his  ships 
and  made  friends  with  the  natives  and  which  Bay  of  Refuge 
lay  a  little  to  the  North  and  East  of  the  triangular  island  of 
Louisa  or  Claudia,  named  for  the  Queen  Mother  and 
Queen  of  Francis  1  of  France,  Verrazano's  patron. 

In  addition,  moreover,  we  have  another  proof  that  the 
John  Dee  Bay  and  River  is  actually  Narragansett  Bay  be- 
cause the  articles  of  indenture  go  on  to  grant,  in  addition 
to  the  river  and  bay,  "Fyftene  hundred  thousande  acres  of 
ground  extende  next  alongst  the  sea  coaste  Westwarde  to- 
wardes  the  ryver  of  Norumbeage". 

The  description  of  this  amount  of  land  from  Point  Judith 
carries  us  60  miles  along  the  coast  and  38  miles  inland  and 
is  equal  to  2356  square  miles  and  would  extend  about  16 
miles  west  of  the  Connecticut  River,  namely  to  the  present 
Guilford  Harbor.  This  is  the  first  grant  of  land  in  North 
America. 

Immediately  following  these  indentures,  Sir  Humphrey 
sailed  from  England  and  in  due  course  reached  St.  John's, 
Newfoundland,  and  there  started  to  found  a  colony  among 
the  fishing  vessels,  twenty-six  of  which  were  in  the  harbor 
when  he  arrived. 

In  the  end,  after  a  turbulent  stay,  Sir  Humphrey  put 
to  sea  and  lost  still  another  ship,  making  his  way  towards 
the  John  Dee  Bay  and  River,  and  the  Cape  and  the  River 
of  Norumbega,  which  had  been  described  by  Verrazano. 
Eight  days  out  of  St.  John's  he  lost  another  ship  and  he 
turned  back  with  two  remaining  vessels.  Sir  Humphrey  in 
the  little  "Squirrel",  but  eight  tons,  went  down,  off  within 
striking  distance  of  the  Azores,  and  the  "Golden  Hind", 
the  last  of  a  fine  fleet,  struggled  home  to  tell  the  story  of 
misadventure  and  defeat.  So  thus  the  great  intended  settle- 
ment of  part  of  what  is  now  Rhode  Island  and  Connecticut, 
granted  with  definite  bounds,  never  came  to  consummation. 


THE  DEE  RIVER  OF  1583  41 

The  Deed  of  1583 

Writing  between  Gilbert  knt.  &  Peckham  Knt. 

Articles  Indented  of  agreemente  made  concluded  and 
agreed  upon  the  laste  days  of  Februarie  in  the  fyve  and 
twentieth  yere  of  the  raigne  of  oure  soveraigne  ladye  Eliza- 
bethe  by  the  grace  of  god  Queene  of  Englande  Fraunce 
and  Irelande  defendor  of  the  faithe  &c.  Betwene  Syr 
Humfrey  Gilbert  of  Compton  in  the  Countie  of  Devon 
knighte  on  the  one  partie  and  Sir  George  Peckham  of  Den- 
ham  in  the  Countie  of  Bucks  knighte  and  George  Peckham 
his  second  sonne  on  the  other  partie  as  followeth  viz. 
Imprimis  Whereas  oure  saide  Soveraigne  ladye  the 
Queenes  majestie  by  her  graces  lettres  Patents  under  the 
greate  seale  of  England  bearing  date  at  Westminster  the 
eleventh  daye  of  June  in  the  twentieth  yere  of  her  majesties 
raigne  hath  geven  and  granted  unto  the  said  Syr  Humfrey 
Gilberte  his  heires  and  assignes  for  ever  free  libertye  from 
tyme  to  tyme  and  at  all  tymes  hereafter  forever  to  discover 
searche  finde  owte  and  vewe  such  remote  heathen  and  bar- 
borous  landes  countries  and  territories  not  actuallie  pos- 
sessed of  any  Christian  Prince  or  people  as  to  him  his  heires 
or  assignes  and  to  every  or  any  of  them  shall  seme  good  and 
the  same  to  have  holde  occupie  and  enjoye  to  him  and  his 
heires  forever  with  all  commodities  Jurisdicions  and  rialties 
both  by  sea  and  lande  and  did  likwise  by  the  said  lettres 
patents  for  her  majestie  her  heires  and  Successors  geve  full 
power  and  authoritie  to  the  saide  Sir  Humfrey  his  heires 
and  assignes  and  every  of  them  that  he  and  they  and  every 
or  any  of  them  shall  or  maye  at  every  time  and  tymes  here- 
after have  take  and  leade  in  the  said  voyage  to  travel  thith- 
erwardes  or  to  inhabit  there  with  him  or  them  and  every  or 
any  of  them  suche  and  so  many  of  her  majestyes  subjectes 
as  shall  willinglie  accompanye  him  and  them  and  every  or 
any  of  them  with  sumciente  shippinge  and  furniture  for 


4.2  RHODE    ISLAND    HISTORICAL    SOCIETY 

their  transportacions  so  that  none  of  the  saide  persons  or 
any  of  them  be  suche  as  after  the  makinge  of  the  said  lettres 
patents  shoulde  he  speciallie  restrayned  by  our  saide  sov- 
eraigne  her  heires  or  successors  the  statutes  or  actes  of  Par- 
liamente  made  againste  fugitives  or  against  such  as  shall 
departe  remaine  or  contynue  oute  of  her  majesties  realme 
of  Englande  withoute  licence  or  any  other  acte  statute  lawe 
or  matter  whatsoever  to  the  contrarie  in  anywise  notwith- 
standinge  as  by  the  saide  lettres  patentes  amongeste  other 
grauntes  articles  and  libertyes  therein  conteyned  more  at 
large  appeareth.  Nowe  the  saide  Sir  Humfrey  Gilberte  as 
well  for  the  more  spedye  execucion  of  her  majesties  saide 
grauntes  and  then  largmente  of  her  majesties  Domynions 
and  govermente  and  also  for  the  better  encouragemente 
of  the  saide  Sir  George  Peckham  and  George  hys  sonne  and 
their  associates  in  so  vvorthie  and  comendable  an  enterprise 
as  also  for  his  and  their  sure  warrante  to  prosecute  the  same 
orderlie  accordinge  to  the  lawes  and  statutes  of  this  realme. 
And  in  consideracon  that  the  saide  Sir  George  hath  dis- 
bursed diverse  sommes  of  money  and  adventured  the  same 
as  a  principall  adventurer  with  the  saide  Sir  Humfrey  as 
also  for  divers  other  weightie  and  good  consideracions  him 
the  saide  Sir  Humfrey  speciallie  movinge  for  hym  his  heires 
executors  administrators  and  assignes  and  every  of  them 
doth  covenante  premise  and  graunte  to  and  with  the  saide 
George  Peckham  knighte  and  George  hys  sonne  their  heires 
executors  administrators  and  assignes  by  theis  presentes 
that  the  said  Sir  George  Peckham  and  George  his  sonne 
his  and  their  assignes  and  associates  adventurers  and  people 
and  every  of  them  shall  and  may  at  all  tymes  hereafter 
and  from  tyme  to  tyme  forever  have  and  enjoy  full  power 
and  free  libertie  and  authoritie  by  vertue  of  the  saide  lettres 
patentes  to  discover  searche  fynde  oute  and  vewe  any  landes 
Countries  or  Islandes  heretofore  not  discovered  searched 
and  inhabited  by  any  Christian  Prince  or  people  by  the 
assignemente  of  the  saide  Sir  Humfrye  his  heires  and  suc- 
cessors and  allso  to  enjoye  to  his  and  their  owne  use  all 


THE  DEE  RIVER  OF   1583  43 

that  ryver  or  porte  called,  by  Master  John  Dee,  Dee  Ryver 
which  Ryver  by  the  discripcion  of  John  Verarzanus  a  Flor- 
entyne  lyeth  in  Septontrionall  latitude  about  fortye  twoo 
degrees  and  has  his  mouth  lyinge  open  to  the  South  halfe 
a  league  brode  or  there  aboute  and  enteringe  Within  the 
saide  Baye  betweene  the  Easte  and  the  Northe  encreaseth 
his  breadith  and  contynueth  twelve  leagues  or  there  abouts 
and  then  maketh  a  gulfe  of  twentie  leagues  compasse  or 
thereabouts  and  conteyneth  in  it  selfe  five  small  Islandes 
newlie  named  the  Cinque  Isles.  And  the  saide  gulfe  and 
the  fyve  Isles  therein  and  all  other  Isles  lyinge  within  the 
saide  Ryver  or  gulfe  together  with  fyfteene  hundred  thou- 
sande  acres  or  grounde  within  the  supposed  contynent  ly- 
inge nexte  adjoininge  upon  the  saide  ryver  gulfe  and  fyve 
Isles  at  the  choyce  of  the  saide  Sir  George  and  George  his 
yongeste  sonne  their  heires  deputies  or  assignes  or  any  of 
them.  To  have  holde  and  enjoye  the  saide  Isle  and  Islande 
together  with  the  saide  fyfteene  hundred  thousande  acres 
of  landes.  [blank  to  end  of  line] 

to  the  saide  Sir  George  Peckham  and  George  Peckham  their 
heires  and  assignes  to  hys  and  their  onlie  uses  forever  by 
Soccage  tenure  of  the  same  Sir  Humfrye  his  heyres  and 
assignes  so  as  the  uttermoste  parts  or  lymytts  of  the  saide 
Fyftene  hundred  thousande  acres  of  grounde  extende  next 
alongst  the  sea  coaste  Westwarde  towardes  the  ryver  of 
Norumbeage*  above  threescore  englishe  myles  in  length  at 
the  moste  with  full  powre  and  aucthoritie  to  inhabite  people 
and  manure  the  said  Islandes  landes  countries  and  terri- 
tories with  all  Jurisdiccions  priviledges  liberties  and  roy- 
allties  both  by  lande  and  by  sea  alongest  all  the  costes  of 
the  saide  countries  and  territories  as  is  aforesaid  yeldinge 
and  payinge  unto  the  saide  Sir  Humfrye  his  heires  succes- 


*In  Norumbeage,  the  "u"  is  written  "v,"  as  is  common  through  the 
document.  It  is  followed  by  four  minims,  instead  of  three,  and  these  could 
read  "un"  or  "im,"  though  none  are  dotted.  It  is,  however,  probably  an 
error  on  the  part  of  the  scribe. 


44  RHODE  ISLAND  HISTORICAL  SOCIETY 

sors  or  assignes  for  every  thousande  acres  of  grounde  of  the 

saide  fiftene  hundred  thousande  acres  of  grounde  after  the 
firste  seaven  yeres  proporcianallie  which  the  same  shalbe 
actuallie  possessed  and  manured  by  the  said  Sir  George 
Peckham  or  George  his  sonne  their  heires  or  assignes  five 
shillinges  and  twoo  fyfte  partes  of  all  the  golde  silver 
pearl e  and  precious  stones  there  growinge  founde  had  and 
gotten  oute  of  the  which  twoo  fyfte  partes  the  Queenes 
majesties  parte  reserved  by  the  lettres  patentes  ys  to  be 
allowed  and  deduced.  Item  that  they  the  saide  Sir  George 
nor  George  his  sonne  their  heires  nor  assignes  shalbe 
charged  with  any  contribucion  towards  any  Warres  other 
then  defends  and  that  onlie  by  acte  of  Parliamente  of 
whiche  assemblie  the  saide  Sir  George  and  all  those  which 
shall  beare  the  name  of  an  Associate  with  hym  shalbe  as 
principall  members  in  every  suche  Sessions  and  assemblie. 
Item  the  saide  Sir  Humfrye  for  the  consideracions  afore - 
saide  doth  covenante  and  graunte  for  him  selfe  his  heires 
successors  and  assignes  and  every  of  them  to  and  with  the 
saide  Sir  George  Peckham  and  George  his  sonne  their  heires 
and  assignes  and  every  of  them  by  theis  presentes  that  he 
the  saide  Sir  George  and  George  his  sonne  their  heires 
assignes  and  people  and  every  of  them  shall  and  maye  have 
and  enjoye  free  liberties  to  trade  and  traffique  into  all  suche 
Countries  Islandes  Isles  and  territories  and  into  every  and 
any  parte  of  them  which  the  saide  Sir  Humfrye  his  heires 
successors  or  assignes  shall  possesse  by  vertue  of  the  Queene 
majesties  saide  lettres  patents  and  his  graunte  thereof  and 
also  that  he  the  saide  Sir  George  and  George  hys  sonne  their 
heires  and  assignes  and  every  of  them  shall  have  thexecu 
cion  of  all  lawes  Ecclesiasticall  temporall  politique  marshall 
and  Civill  both  marine  and  others  and  every  of  them  aswell 
within  the  precincte  of  the  said  fyfteene  hundred  thousande 
acres  of  grounde  as  also  uppon  the  sea  coste  thereof  so  fan- 
as  the  saide  landes  shall  extende  it  selfe  as  aforesaide  Item 
the  saide  Sir  Humfrye  Gilberte  for  him  his  heires  succes- 
sors and  assignes  doth  covenante  from  tyme  to  tyme  upon 


5C 


2  > 
P  7 


nq 


<  O 


46  RHODE  ISLAND  HISTORICAL  SOCIETY 

performance  of  the  covenantes  in  this  booke  conteyned  to 
exonerate  discharge  and  sufficient] ie  to  save  harmeles  the 
saide  Sir  George  and  George  his  sonne  theire  heires  and 
assignes  and  everie  of  them  of  and  from  the  Queues  majes- 
tie  her  heyres  successors  and  assignes  for  and  concernynge 
the  payment  of  the  Ewer  of  golde  and  silver  and  other 
duties  services  and  demaundes  to  her  majestie  her  heires 
and  successors  by  the  saide  lettres  patents  payeble  and  re- 
served and  likewise  shall  and  will  fynishe  suche  further  and 
better  assuraunce  and  assuraunce  of  the  premysses  unto  the 
saide  Sir  George  and  George  hys  sonne  their  heyres  and 
assignes  forever.  Within  three  monethes  nexte  after  the 
hrste  and  nexte  retorne  of  the  saide  Sir  Humfrye  or  hys 
assignes  consortes  adventurers  or  associates  from  the  saide 
voyage  of  discoverye  by  the  saide  Sir  Humfrye  nowe  in- 
tended in  suche  manner  and  sorte  as  by  the  saide  Sir  George 
and  George  hys  sonne  their  heyres  or  assignes  or  any  of  them 
or  the  learned  counsell  of  them  or  any  of  them  shalbe  rea- 
sonablie  and  lawful  lye  devised  and  required  And  the  same 
Sir  George  and  George  hys  sonne  for  them  selfs  their  heires 
and  assignes  and  every  of  them  doe  covenant  premyse  and 
graunt  to  and  with  the  saide  Sir  Humfrey  his  heires  suc- 
cessors and  assignes  and  every  of  them  by  theise  presents 
that  they  the  said  Sir  George  and  George  hys  sonne  shall 
doe  their  best  indevor  to  procure  and  obteyne  her  majesties 
leave  and  good  lykeinge  that  all  those  whoe  have  or  shall 
adventure  with  the  saide  Sir  Humfrye  Sir  George  or 
George  hys  sonne  or  eyther  of  them  into  the  saide  Coun- 
tries and  whose  names  shalbe  entered  into  a  register  booke 
for  that  purpose  to  be  made  and  kepte  and  shalbe  Willinge 
to  travaile  into  anye  of  the  saide  remote  Countries  maye 
freelye  passe  into  those  Countries  there  to  remayne  or  to 
retorne,  backe  at  hys  or  their,  or  any  of  their  Will  and 
Pleasure.  And  the  said  Sir  George  Peckham  and  George 
hys  sonne  doe  further  covenant  and  graunte  for  them  sel\  es 
their  heires  executors  and  assignes  to  and  with  the  said  Sir 
Humfrey  Gilbert  hys  heyres  successors  and  assignes  by 


THE  DEE  RIVER  OF  1583  47 

theis  presents  that  he  nor  they  nor  any  of  them  their  heires 
or  assignes  shall  deferre  thexecucon  of  Justice  within  their 
liberties  beinge  thereunto  required  by  the  saide  Sir  Hum- 
frye  hys  heyres  successors  or  assignes  against  any  suche  as 
shall  conspire  against  the  person  of  the  saide  Sir  Humfrey 
hys  heyres  successors  or  principall  assignee  or  commytt  any 
capitall  offence  or  shall  deteyne  or  protecte  from  Justice 
any  person  hys  landes  or  goodes  contrarie  to  the  lawes  to 
be  established  in  therefore  mencioned  remote  countries  and 
territories  nowe  ment  to  be  discovered  Which  the  saide 
Sir  Humfrye  Gilbert  hys  heyres  successors  or  assignes  shall 
have  holde  occupie  or  enjoye  by  right  or  tytle  under  or  by 
vertue  of  the  Quenes  majesties  lettres  patents  to  hym 
graunted  as  before  is  mencioned  provided  allwaies  and 
nevertheles  yt  is  concluded  condiscended  and  agreed  by  and 
betwene  the  saide  proties  that  yf  the  saide  Sir  George  or 
George  hys  sonne  their  heyres  or  assignes  shall  at  any  tyme 
or  tymes  hereafter  Willinglye  Wittinglye  and  maliciouslye 
pretend  doe  or  goe  about  to  doe  or  willinglye  suffer  to  be 
done  any  manner  of  acte  thinge  or  things  Whatsoever 
tendinge  to  the  distruccion  or  subvercion  of  the  said  Sir 
Humfrey  hys  heyres  successors  or  chief  assigne  or  principall 
governor  or  doe  or  willinglye  commytt  any  acte  Whereby 
the  saide  Sir  Humfrye  hys  heyres  successors  or  assignes 
shall  lose  the  benefitt  of  the  graunt  of  the  said  lettres  pat- 
ents or  he  or  hys  heyres  successors  or  assignes  to  be  by  the 
Quenes  Majestie  or  her  or  her  successors  dissavowed  for- 
ever or  yf  he  or  they  doe  publiquelye  or  notoriouslye  mayn- 
teyne  any  suche  person  or  persones  as  shall  publiquely  or 
openlye  goe  about  to  distroye  or  overthrowe  the  right  tytle 
or  person  of  the  said  Sir  Humfrye  hys  heyres  successors  or 
hys  chief  and  principall  assigne  in  princypall  governement 
or  the  subversion  of  the  common  wealth  of  the  said  Sir 
Humfrey  hys  heyres  or  successors  their  Countreys  or  Ter- 
rytoryes  that  then  and  from  thensfourth  this  present 
graunte  and  all  covenants  therein  conteyned  to  be  come 
voide  and  of  none  effecte  to  all  entents  and  purposes  as  yf 


MAP  SHOWING    IK  U    I    OF   I  .AN! 


>ITIONED   IN   DEED   OF    15  83 


50  RHODE  ISLAND  HISTORICAL  SOCIETY 

the  same  hadd  never  hen  had  nor  made  any  thinge  in  these 
presents  conteyned  to  the  contrarye  hereof  in  any  wise  not- 
withstandinge 

In  wittnes  whereof  the  parties  abovesaid  to  theise  present 
articles  Indented  Interchaungablie  have  hereunto  putt  then- 
hands  and  seals  yeoven  the  daye  and  yere  first  above  written 

|  At  the  foot  in  Latin  |  And  know  ye  that  the  first  day  of 
March  the  year  abovesaid  the  said  Humfrey  Gylberte, 
knight,  came  before  the  said  Lady  the  Queen  in  her 
chancery  and  acknowledged  the  writing  aforesaid  and  all 
and  singular  in  the  same  contained  and  specified  in  form 
abovesaid. 

Enrolled  the  first  day  of  July  the  year  abovesaid. 
(Close  Roll  1154) 


Counterfeiting  in  Colonial  Days 

Communicated  by  Edward  H.  West 

The  Examination  of  Nicholas  Camp  of  Rehoboth 
taken  at  Newport  14  August  1  723. 

Being  at  John  Butterworths  house  in  Rehoboth  on  or 
about  two  yeras  Past  &  Said  Butterworths  wife  Lett  me 
have  one  three  Pound  bill  which  was  a  counterfitt  bill  of  ye 
Provence  of  the  Massochusets  Bay  She  Showed  me  the 
bill  when  it  was  about  halfe  made  &  She  told  me  She  would 
(  rive  me  one  ten  Pound  for  rise  Pounds  if  I  would  take 
Such  bills  &  Pass  them  which  was  the  Cause  of  my  Being- 
Concerned  in  the  uttering  or  Passing  of  a  considerable  Sum 
of  Counterfitt  Bills  which  1  had  of  Said  Butterworths  Wife 
which  three  Pound  Bill  my  wife  passed  to  James  Dexter  at 
Providence  &  1  never  heard  of  itt  Since  butt  according  to 


COUNTERFEITING  51 

our  agreement  I  Returned  thirty  Shillings  in  good  bills 
afterward  in  Lue  of  the  three  Pound  bill  the  Second  bill 
I  Received  of  Sd  Butterworths  wife  was  a  five  Pound 
Counterfitt  bill  of  the  Collony  of  Rhoad  Island  I  Re- 
ceived itt  about  a  month  after  I  Received  Said  three  Pound 
Bill  &  I  gott  one  John  Stevens  to  pass  the  five  Pound  bill 
unto  William  Turpin  of  Providence  &  he  gave  him  in  Lue 
thereof  two  forty  Shilling  bills  &  Some  Small  bills  &  I 
Returned  in  Lue  thereof  unto  Sd  Butterworths  wife  fifty- 
Shillings  or  thereabouts  but  Said  Stevens  Did  not  know 
that  itt  was  a  bad  bill  for  I  told  him  I  owed  Some  money 
to  Sd  Turpin  and  could  not  well  Pay  him  that  therefore 
would  Desire  him  to  change  itt,  I  passed  away  at  John 
Hawses  an  other  five  Pound  bill  to  a  Providence  man  & 
another  five  Pound  bill  to  Thomas  Rolton  and  had  a  three 
Pound  bill  &  a  ten  Shilling  and  Some  oather  Small  bills  in 
Change  and  the  "two  Last  bills  was  of  the  Collony  of  Rhoad 
Island  and  I  received  them  of  John  Butterworths  wife  and 
Gave  one  halfe  the  Sume  when  Changed  according  to  our 
agreement  unto  her  the  Said  Butterworths  wife  I  having 
some  Discous  with  Sd  Butterworths  wife  I  asked  her  how 
She  Made  the  bills  which  She  Gave  me  She  told  me  She 
Layed  a  peas  of  fine  watter  starched  musoline  upon  them 
&  So  Pucked  out  the  Letters  upon  Said  musoline  &  then 
Layed  the  musoline  upon  a  clean  Peas  of  Paper  and  so 
made  ye  Impresion  of  the  Letters  by  the  Letters  Pucked  out 
on  the  musoline  with  a  fine  Pen  She  afterward  went  over 
the  Letters  again  as  She  told  me  to  finish  them  and  I  Saw 
Israel  Peck  make  a  pair  of  Crows  quill  and  understood  itt 
was  for  that  Service  and  Sea  the  musoline  att  the  Same 
time  and  itt  was  Pricked  out  Said  Butterworths  wife  told 
me  that  Daniel  Hunt  of  Rehoboth  was  Concerned  in  Pass- 
ing Sd  Counterfitt  bills  of  her  making  and  that  Her  brother 
Israel  Peck  came  unto  her  about  the  time  Sd  Hunt  was 
Carryed  to  Bristall  and  Examined  by  Coll  Byfiield  about 
Passing  a  counterfitt  bill  and  he  the  Sd  Israel  Peck  then 
Desired  her  to  Lett  him  have  what  Good  bills  she  had  in 


52  RHODE  ISLAND  HISTORICAL  SOCIETY 

the  house  that  Hunt  might  make  a  Great  as  appearance  as 
he  Could  before  Coll  Byffield  but  She  would  not  Let  Sd 
Israel  have  themLeast  Hunt  Should  would  Leave  of  and 
then  She  Should  not  Gett  her  money  againe  I  then  asked 
her  whether  Hunt  Knowed  She  had  any  money  &  She  told 
mee  he  Did  for  her  had  Changed  a  pretty  deal  for  her 
about  that  time  &  She  told  me  that  Her  Brothers  Israel 
Peck  &  Nicholas  Peck  Lett  him  have  what  Good  bills  they 
had  to  make  his  appearance  before  Sd  Coll  Byffield  Said 
Butterworths  wife  told  me  that  the  first  bills  that  She  began 
to  make  was  of  the  Collony  of  Rhoad  Island  &  She  likewise 
told  me  that  She  had  Kightean  or  twenty  five  Pound  bills 
by  her  when  her  brother  Nicholas  Peck  was  in  Prison  att 
Newport  for  Passing  a  counterfitt  bill  and  they  all  Passed 
Cleen  that  She  maid  only  that  which  was  taken  with  Said 
Nicholas  Peck  &  She  told  me  that  they  durstnot  Pass  any  of 
them  five  Pound  bills  att  Boston  for  they  ware  better 
Known  at  Boston  than  they  ware  att  Rhoad  Island  &  the 
Said  Israel  Peck  helped  make  the  body  of  the  bills  him 
Selfe  but  Could  not  finesh  any  with  out  her  assistance  and 
Israel  Peck  told  me  the  Same  him  Selfe  She  Likewise  told 
my  wife  that  her  brother  Steven  Peck  had  made  two  bills 
one  of  five  Pounds  &  one  twenty  Shilling  bill  and  She  Said 
they  would  not  do  and  therefore  She  would  burn  them  and 
my  wife  told  me  of  that  My  wife  told  me  Likewise  that 
She  went  into  Butterworths  hous  &  Said  Butterworths  wife 
was  making  a  bill  &  there  Lay  by  her  the  musoline  while 
She  was  making  the  bill  that  was  Peicked  out  for  that 
Service  &  She  Said  to  my  wife  that  if  She  would  come  to 
her  house  She  would  Learn  her  &  that  she  had  Larnt  Nich- 
olas Pecks  wife  to  make  them  &  She  could  make  them  as 
well  as  her  Selfe  &  She  told  me  that  Joseph  Carpender 
Received  a  bill  of  twenty  Shillings  of  her  which  was  a 
counterfitt  bill  but  he  returned  itt  againe  unto  her  and  She 
gave  him  an  oather  in  Lue  thereof  I  put  away  about  fifty 
Pounds  worth  of  Counterfitt  bills  of  ye  Collony  of  Con- 
necticut which  I  had  of  Said  Butterworths  wife  and  all  of 


COUNTERFEITING  53 

them  ware  five  Pound  bills  and  I  lett  her  have  one  halfe 
the  Sum  when  Changed  I  had  about  two  hundred  &  fifty 
Pounds  in  Counterfitt  bills  of  the  Collony  of  Rhoad  Island 
&  the  Provence  of  Massachusets  bay  of  Said  Butterworths 
wife  which  1  Passed  away  I  passed  Divis  of  sd  five  Pound 
Counterfitt  bills  of  the  Collony  of  Connecticut  with  the 
persons  hereafter  mentioned  one  to  John  Bishop  one  to 
Madam  Mackintosh  one  to  Philip  Tilinghast  att  Provi- 
dence and  one  to  a  Connecticut  man  one  to  Pratt  of  Sail- 
ham  I  passed  unto  James  Dexter  of  Providence  a  fourty 
Shilling  bill  and  my  wife  passed  a  five  Pound  bill  unto  him 
both  of  them  was  of  the  Provence  of  Massachusetts  Bay 
I  had  them  of  Sd  Butterworths  wife  She  gave  me  two  of 
these  five  Pound  Bills  for  one  Good  one  and  She  made 
them  boath  as  She  told  me  by  the  Good  bill  I  Lett  her  have 
I  putt  one  Hobots  name  on  the  back  Side  of  one  of  them 
and  that  I  sent  to  Josiah  Carpendor  by  my  Sister  &  he  re- 
ceived itt  I  passed  one  twenty  Shilling  bill  of  the  Collony 
of  Rhoad  Island  unto  John  Frenches  wife  &  her  husband 
Sent  itt  to  Boston  but  itt  was  Returned  againe  &  is  now  in 
the  hands  of  Justice  Smith  of  Rehoboth  &  Said  bill  I  had  of 
Said  Butterworths  wife  I  passed  three  bills  that  was 
Counterfitt  I  had  two  of  them  of  Sd  Butterworths  wife 
unto  Nicholas  Pulin  and  he  Paid  them  away  unto  Ebenezer 
Lyon  of  the  Collony  of  Connecticut  But  Sd  Pullen  did 
not  Know  that  they  ware  Good  bills  Two  of  them  ware 
of  ye  Collony  of  Rhoad  Island  &  one  of  the  Provence  of 
the  Massachusets  bay  the  other  one  I  had  of  Israel  Peck 

Taken  upon  Solem  oath  Nicholas  Camp 

in  Newport  above  Sd 

before  me 

Sam  Cranston  Gov 

John  Coddington     Just  of  Peace 


54  RHODE  ISLAM)  HISTORICAL  SOCIETY 

Roger  Williams'  Funeral* 

Memorandum  of  Historical  Farts  by  B.  C.  //. 

Jany  22,  1822  John  Howland  this  day  informed  me  that 
Roger  Williams  was  hurried  near  Patience  Ashtons  grave 
in  land  now  used  and  ocupied  by  Sullivan  Dorr  as  a  garden 
said  P.  Ashtons  Grave  stones  I  have  seen  &  they  have  not 
been  removed  until  within  5  or  10  years.  Howlands  infor- 
mation was  reed  from  Governour  Bowen  who  received  it 
from  Justice  Brown  so  called  (at  that  time)  from  his  being 
a  Justice  of  the  peace  Brown  stated  that  he  recollected  the 
funeral  of  Roger  Williams  very  well,  that  there  was  a  con- 
siderable parade  at  the  time  &  that  guns  were  hred  over 
his  grave,  and  further  stated  that  he  was  in  the  habit  of 
crossing  the  Jots  in  his  way  to  and  from  the  Neck  (where 
he  lived )  &  not  unfrequently  directly  by  the  grave  of 
R W which  he  stated  generally  lead  to  some  ob- 
servations respecting  him  the  said  Williams. 

Copied  from  a  ledger  of  Benjamin  Cushing  Harris, 
owned  by  Benjamin  Pierce  Harris. 

New  Publieations  of  Rhode  Island  Interest 

Moif  unpublished  Berkeley  Letters  and  Nezv  Berke- 
leiana  is  the  title  of  a  nineteen  page  pamphlet  by  Canon 
A.  A.  Luce  which  is  reprinted  from  volume  23  of  ller- 
matJiena,  1933.  Among  the  letters  included  in  this  article 
are  the  two  Berkeley  letters  which  are  in  the  Society's 
library. 

The  Trading  Post  of  Roger  Will 'nuns  with  tliose  of 
John  Wilcox  and  Richard  Smith  by  Howard  M.  Chapin 
is  a  pamphlet  of  26  pages  issued  in  December  by  the  Society 
of  Colonial  Wars  in  Rhode  Island. 


*A  briei  reference  to  the  funeral  oi  Roger  Williams  appears  on  page  12 
ol  the  Report  ufon  the  Burial  Place  oj  Roger  Williams,  which  was  pub- 
lished by  the  Rhode  Island  Historical  Society  in  191  S. 


■    »—>*; 


PAIR  OF  OVERSHOES  WORN  BY  LAFAYETTE   AND  PRESENTED 

BY  HIM   TO  GEORGE  W.  GREENE  WHO  GAVE  THEM   TO  THE 

RHODE  ISLAND  HISTORICAL  SOCIETY. 


Now  in  the  Society's  Museum. 


A  MEDAL  STRUCK  IN   PROVIDENCE  IN   183  5  INOBSERVANCE 
OF    THE    DEATH    OF    LAFAYETTE    THE    PRECEDING    YEAR. 

In  the  Society's  Museum. 


56  RHODE   ISLAM)   HISTORICAL  SOCIETY 

The  Bulletin  of  the  Newport  Historical  Society  for 
January  1934  contains  a  paper  on  Steamboats  on  Narra- 
gansett  Bay  by  William  King  Co  veil. 

Volume  2  of  the  Collections  of  the  New  London  County 
Historical  Society,  entitled  Connecticut's  Naval  Office  at 
Nerdc  London  During  the  War  of  the  American  Revolution 
by  Ernest  E.  Rogers,  contains  some  letters  written  by  Esek 
Hopkins. 

Antiques  for  March  1934  contains  an  article  on  the  date 
of  Gilbert  Stuart's  death,  the  place  of  his  burial  and  the  in- 
ventory of  his  estate,  by  John  Hill  Morgan. 

The  Records  of  the  Suffolk  County  Court,  1 67 1-1 680, 
which  are  published  as  volumes  29  and  30  of  the  Publica- 
tions of  the  Colonial  Society  of  Massachusetts,  contain 
many  items  of  Rhode  Island  interest,  and  an  interesting 
and  useful  introduction  by  Zechariah  Chafee,  Jr. 


New  Members 

The  following  persons  have  been  elected  to  membership 
in  the  Society: 

Mr.  J.  Earle  Bacon  Mrs.  Benjamin  B.  Manchester 

Mr.  Charles  C.  Stover  Mr.  Gardner  T.  Swarts,  Jr. 

Mr.  William  G.  Braude 


Lafayette  Centenary* 

Lafayette  died  on  May  20,  1834,  and  this  year,  1934, 
the  centenary  of  his  death  is  being  observed  throughout  the 
United  States  with  appropriate  ceremonies. 


*For  an  account  of  Lafayette's  visits  to  Rhode  Island,  sec  the  Rhode 
Island  Historical  Society  Collections  for  January  1926,  vol.  xix, 
P.  1. 


WESTCONNAUG  57 

The  Minutes  of  the  Westconnaug  Purchase 

Transcribed  by  Theodore  G.  Foster 
{Continued  from  page  32) 

At  a  Meeting  of  the  Proprietors  of  the  Westquanaug 
Purchase  held  by  Adjournment  at  the  House  of  Capt  Peter 
Cook  in  Scituate  in  said  Purchase  on  Monday  the  First  Day 
of  October  Ad  1770.  Thomas  Hill  continued  Moderator — 

Voted  that  Mr  William  West  be  a  Committee  Man  to 
go  to  the  Town  Clerks  offices  at  Newport  and  Providence 
and  at  Scituate  to  get  from  each  of  their  Hands  whatever 
in  Plats  of  the  Westquanaug  Purchase  are  recorded  in 
either  of  their  offices  agreeable  to  the  former  Proprietors 
order  and  make  a  Report  thereof  to  the  next  Proprietors 
Meeting 

This  Meeting  is  adjournd  to  the  First  Monday  in 
March  which  will  be  the  Fourth  Day  of  the  Month  A  D. 
1771.       at  1 0  °Clock  Forenoon  at  the  House  of  Capt  Peter 
Cook  Aforesaid 
Test  Thos  Brown  Proprietors  Clerk 

At  a  Meeting  of  the  Proprietors  of  the  Westquanaug  Pur- 
chase held  by  Adjournment  at  the  House  of  Capt  Peter 
Cooke  in  Scituate  on  Monday  the  Fourth  Day  of  March 
AD  1771 

Peter  Cook  Moderator  for  this  Meeting 
This  Meeting  is  adjournd  to  Saturday  the  16th  Day  of  this 
Instant  March  at  10  °Clock  in  the  Forenoon  at  the  House 
of  Capt  Peter  Cook  in  Scituate 
Test  Thos  Brown  Proprietors  Clerk 

At  a  Meeting  of  the  Proprietors  of  the  Westquanaug  Pur- 
chase held  by  Adjournment  at  the  House  of  Capt  Peter 
Cook  in  said  Purchase  on  Saturday  the  1 6th  Day  of  March 
AD  1771 


58  RHODE  ISLAND  HISTORICAL  SOCIETY 

Thomas  Hill  continued  Moderator 
Having  heared  the  Report  of  Mr  William  West  who  was 
chosen  a  Committee  Man  to  enquire  whether  the  Original 
Plats  at  the  Westquanaug  Purchase  were  recorded  in  New- 
port or  Providence  or  Scituate  agreeable  to  the  Original 
Proprietors  order 

And  the  said  West  made  Report  to  this  Meeting  That 
he  has  examined  the  Several  Town  Clerks  Offices  and  can- 
not find  any  Records  of  the  Original  Plats  or  said  Purchase 
on  Record  in  them  or  either  of  their  Offices 

This  Meeting  is  Adjourned  to  Saturday  the  First  Day 
of  June  next  at  1 2  °Clock  at  Noon  at  the  House  of  Jeremiah 
Angell  Esq  in  Scituate  March  the  16th  1771 

Test  Thos  Brown  Proprietors  Clerk 

At  a  Meeting  of  the  Proprietors  of  the  Westquanaug  Pur- 
chase held  by  Adjournment  at  the  House  of  Jeremiah 
Angell  Esq  in  Scituate  on  Saturday  the  First  Day  of  June 
AD.   1771       Thomas  Hill  continued  Moderator 

Whereas  there  is  a  Petition  exhibitted  to  this  Meeting- 
relating  to  the  Bounds  of  the  Lands  of  the  Westquanuag 
Purchase  which  Petition  is  referred  to  the  next  Meeting 

This  Meeting  is  adjourned  to  the  Third  Saturday  in 
September  next  at  the  House  of  Jeremiah  Angell  Esq  in 
Scituate  at  Twelve  °Clock  at  Noon 

Test  Thos  Brown  Proprietors  Clerk 

At  a  Meeting  of  the  Proprietors  of  the  Westquanaug  Pur- 
chase held  by  Adjournment  at  the  House  of  Jeremiah 
Angel  Esq  in  Scituate  on  Saturday  the  21st  Day  of  Sep- 
tember AD  1771  Thomas  Hill  Chosen  Moderator 
Whereas  there  was  a  Petition  at  the  Former  Meeting- 
exhibited  for  Revising  and  Regulating  the  Bounds  of  the 
Lands  in  the  Westquanaug  Purchase  where  the  Persons 
concernd  shall  think  proper  they  paying  the  Charge  that 
shall  accrue  upon  the  same 


WESTCONNAUG  59 

It  is  therefore  Voted  that  said  Petition  be  received 
and  it  is  hereby  received 

This  Meeting  is  adjourned  to  the  First  Monday  in 
Novemr  at  1 2  °clock  at  Noon  at  the  House  of  Capt  Peter 

Cooke  in  Scituate  in  said  Purchase 

Test  Thos  Brown  Proprietors  Clerk 

At  a  Meeting  of  the  Proprietors  of  the  Westquanaug 
Purchase  held  by  adjournment  at  the  House  of  Capt  Peter 
Cooke  in  said  Scituate  in  said  Purchase  on  Monday  the  4th 
Day  of  Nov1"  AD  1771  Thomas  Hill  Chosen  Mod- 

erator of  this  Meeting 

Benjamin  Wite  Jun  is  chosen  a  Committee  Man  in 
the  Room  of  Capt  Chris1  Relph This  Meeting  is  ad- 
journed to  the  Second  Saturday  of  April  next  at  12  °Clock 
at  Noon  at  the  House  of  Capt  Peter  Cooke  in  Scituate  in 
said  Purchase  which  will  be  in  the  year  1772 
Test  Thos  Brown  Proprietors  Clerk 

At  a  Meeting  of  the  Proprietors  of  the  Westquanaug 
Purchase  at  the  House  of  Peter  Cooke  in  Scituate  in  said 
Purchase  on  Saturday  the  1 1th  Day  of  April  AD  1  772 

Thomas  Hill  continued  Moderator  of  this  Meeting 
Voted  that  the  Clerk  procure  a  Book  suitable  for  the 
Recording  the  Returns  that  shall  be  made  by  the  Com- 
mittee and  Surveyor  in  said  Purchase  for  the  Revising  and 
maintaining  the  original  Boundarys  in  said  Purchase 

This  Meeting  is  adjourned  to  the  House  of  Thomas 
Brown  in  Scituate  in  said  Purchase  to  Monday  the  14th  Day 
of  September  next  A  D  1772 

This  Meeting  is  adjourned  to  the  House  of  Mi- 
George  Taylor  Innholder  in  Said  Scituate  in  said  Purchase 

to  Three  of  the  Clock  this  present  Afternoon 

Test  Thos  Brown  Proprietors  Clerk 


At  the  Time  and  Place  last  mentioned  the  Proprietors 
met  and  Continued 


()()  RHODE  ISLAND  HISTORICAL  SOCIETY 

Thomas  Hill  Moderator  of  this  Meeting 
This  Meeting  is  adjournd  to  Saturday  the  Tenth  Day  of 
April  next  at  12  "Clock  at  Noon  at  the  House  of  Stephen 

Sheldon  Innholder  in  Scituate  in  said  Purchase 

Test  Thos  Brown  Proprietor  Clerk 

At  a  Meeting  of  the  Proprietors  of  the  Westquanaug  Pur- 
chase held  by  Adjournment  at  the  House  of  Stephen 
Sheldon  Junr  in  Scituate  in  said  Purchase  on  the  Tenth  of 
April  A  D  1773       Thomas  Hill  continued  Moderator 

This  Meeting  adjourned  to  the  Second  Saturday  of 
September  next  which  is  on  the  Eleventh  Day  of  said 
Month  A  D  1  773  at  the  House  of  Stephen  Sheldon  Jun  in 
Scituate  in  said  Purchase  at  Twelve  "Clock  at  Noon 

At  a  Meeting  of  the  Proprietors  of  the  Westquanaug  Pur- 
chase held  by  adjournment  at  the  House  of  Stephen  Shel- 
don Jun  Innholder  in  Scituate  in  said  Purchase  on  Saturday 
the  1  1th  Day  of  Septem1'  A  D  1773  Thomas  Hill  con- 
tinued Moderator  of  this  Meeting 

This  Meeting  is  adjournd  to  Saturday  the  16th  Day  of 
October  next  at  2  "Clock  in  the  Afternoon  at  the  House  of 
Stephen  Sheldon  Jun  Innholder  in  Scituate  in  said  Purchase 
Test  Thomas  Brown  Proprietors  Clerk 

At  a  Meeting  held  by  Adjournment  at  the  House  of 
Stephen  Sheldon  Jun  in  Scituate  in  said  Purchase  on  Sat- 
urday the  1 6th  Day  of  October  A  I)  1  773 

Thomas  Hill  continued  Moderator 
This  Meeting  is  adjourned  to  the  First  Saturday  in  April 
next  at  the  House  of  Stephen  Sheldon  Jun  Innholder  in 
Scituate  in  said  Province  at  1 2  "Clock  at  Noon 

Test  Thos  Brown  Proprietors  Clerk 

At  a  Meeting  of  the  Proprietors  of  the  Westquanaug  Pur- 
chase held  by  adjournment  at  the  House  of  Stephen  Shel- 
don Jun  Innholder  in  Scituate  in  said  Purchase  on  Saturday 
the  Second  Day  of  April  AD  1  774 


WESTCONNAUG  61 

Thomas  Hill  continued  Moderator  of  this  Meeting 
This  Meeting  adjourned  to  the  First  Saturday  in  October 
next  which  will  be  the  First  Day  of  said  Month  at  the 
House  of  Stephen  Sheldon  Jun  Innholder  in  Scituate  in 
said  Purchase  at  1 2  "Clock  at  Noon 

Test  Thos  Brown  Proprietors  Clerk 


Rhode  Island  Historical  Society 
Treasurer's  Report 

INCOME  ACCOUNT  FOR  THE  YEAR    1933 


Receipts 

Annual  Dues    $2,495.00 

Dividends  and  Interest  3,916.82 

Rental  of  Rooms 75.00 

State  Appropriation   1,500.00 


$7,986.82 


Expenditures 

Binding    $       47.37 

Books   562.86 

Electric  Light  and  Gas 3  5.19 

Exhibitions  1  1 9.0 1 

Expense    1  3  1 .61 

Grounds  93.78 

Heating    700.00 

Newspaper    27.67 

Publications    5  50.16 

Salaries  5,325.00 

Supplies    302.42 

Telephone    59.75 

Water  8.00 


$7,962.82 
Surplus  Income  Account 24.00 

$7,986.82 


62  RHODE  ISLAND  HISTORICAL  SOCIETY 

STATEMENT  OF  CONDITION,  DECEMBER   31,   193  3 


Assets 

Grounds  and   Building     $    25,000.00 

Investments:  Bonds 

$4,000.   Cedars  Rapids  M.  &  P.  Co.,  5s,  195  3    $3,228.88 

3,000.   Central  Mfg.  District 3,000.00 

3,000.   Cleveland  Elec.  Ilium.  Co.,  5s,   1939      2,565.42 

4,000.    Dominion  of  Canada,  5s,  1952 4,003.91 

1,000.    Western  Electric  Co.,  5s,  1944 998.17 

4,000.    61    Broadwav  Bldg.,    1st   Mtge.,   5>^s, 

1950    ' 4,000.00 

4,000.  Minnesota  P.  &  Lt.  Co.,  1st  5s,  195  5  3,930.00 
4,000.    Monongahela  Valley  Traction  Co.,  1st 

5s,  1942 3,685.00 

2,000.   Ohio  Power  Co.,  1st  &  Ref.  5s,  195  2      1,974.00 

2,000.    Narragansett  Elec.  Co.,  5s,  1947  1,980.00 

2,000.   Shell  Union  Oil  Corp.,  5s,  1947 1,979.00 

2,000.    Koppers  Gas  &  Coke  Co.,  5s,  1947  1,962.50 

1,000.  Indianapolis  Power  &  Lt.,  1st  5s,  1957  994.50 
1,000.  Texas  Pwr.  &  Lt.,  1st  Ref.  5s,  1956  1,021.25 
1,000.  Pennsylvania  R.  R.,  Deb.  4^s,  1970  922.50 
1,000.    Pennsylvania  Water  &  Power  Co.,    1st 

5s,  1940  1,005.42 

Stocks 
54  shs.  New  York  Central  Railroad  Co $3,766.47 

125  shs.  Pennylsvania  Railroad  Co. 7,638.35 

30  shs.  Lehigh  Valley  Railroad  Co 2,112.50 

7  shs.  Lehigh  Valley  Coal  Sales  Co 23  5.39 

40  shs.  Milwaukee  Elec.  Ry.  6c  Lt.  Co.,  Pfd.      3,900.00 
64  shs.  American  Telephone  &  Telegraph  Co.    5,960.05 

3  50  shs.  Providence  Gas  Co.   5,755.68 

1  5  shs.  Providence  National  Bank  )  j  oqq  qq 

30  shs.  Merchants1  National  Bank  Bldg.\ 

45  shs.  Blackstone  Canal  National  Bank  1,050.00 

52  shs.  Atchison,  Topeka  8c  S.E.  Ry.  Co., Com.   6,247.8  5 

20  shs.  American  Power  &  Light    1,696.50 

3  0  shs.  Standard  Gas  &  Electric,  4s,  Pfd 1,906.50 

35  shs.  Public  Service  of  N.  [.,  5s,  Pfd.  3,327.63 

1  0  shs.  Public  Service  of  N.   [.,  5s,  Cum.  Pfd.        990.00 

1  0  shs.  Electric  Bond  and  Share,  5s,  Pfd 922.00 

84,559.47 


Cash  on  hand    4,164.37 

$113,723.84 


treasurer's  report  63 

Liabilities 
Equipment  Fund  $   25,000.00 

Permanent  Endowment  Fund: 

Samuel  M.  Noyes $  1 2,000.00 

Henry  J.  Steere 1  0,000.00 

James  H.  Bugbee 6,000.00 

Charles  H.  Smith ^ 5,000.00 

William  H.  Potter 3,000.00 

Charles  W.  Parsons 4,000.00 

Esek  A.  Jillson 2,000.00 

John  Wilson  Smith 1,000.00 

William  G.  Weld 1,000.00 

Charles  C.  Hoskins 1 ,000.00 

Charles  H.  Atwood 1,000.00 

Edwin  P.  Anthony 4,000.00 

John  F.  Street 1,000.00 

George  L.  Shepley 5,000.00 

Franklin  Lyceum  Memorial 734.52 

56,734.52 


Publication  Fund: 

Robert  P.  Brown  $    2,000.00 

Ira  P.  Peck 1,000.00 

William  Gammell    1,000.00 

Albert  J.  Jones 1 ,000.00 

William  Ely  1 ,000.00 

Julia  Bullock 500.00 

Charles  H.  Smith 1  00.00 

6,600.00 

Life  Membership  5,600.00 

Book  Fund  3,0 1 2.41 

Reserve  Fund  1,043.12 

Revolving  Publication  Fund  165.24 

Surplus  1  3,900.87 

Surplus  Income  Account  1,667.68 

$113,723.84 


64  RHODE    ISLAND    HISTORICAL    SOCIETY 


PRINCIPAL  ACCOUNT  FOR  THE   YEAR    1933 


Rkckipts 


Reserve  Fund  $       15.15 

Revolving  Publication  Fund  151.30 


$     166.45 
Balance  January  1,  193  3 2,764.97 


$2,931.42 


Payments 

Reserve  Fund  $       70.40 

Revolving  Publication  Fund 364.33 


$    434.73 
Balance  December  31,  1933 : 2,496.69 


$2,931.42 
Providence,  R.  L,  January  9,  1934. 

Respectfully  submitted, 

G.  A.  Harrington, 

Treasurer 


Form  of  Legacy 


"/  give  and  bequeath  to  the  Rhode  Island 
Historical  Society  the  sum  of 
dollars." 


\r        i 


Roger  Williams  Press         ^1^ 


E.  A.  Johnson  Co. 


PROVIDENCE 


/ 


Rhode    Island 

Historical  Society 

Collections 


Vol.  XXVII 


JULY,  1934 


GOVERNOR  JOSEPH  JENCKES 

See  "page  65 


No.  3 


Issued  Quarterly 


68  Waterman  Street,  Providence,  Rhode  Island 


CONTENTS 


Fit 


PAGE 

Governor  Joseph  Jenckes    .  .  .  Cover  and  65 

Providence  in  Civil  War  Days 

by  Theodore  Collier  ....  66 

New  Publications  of  Rhode  Island  Interest   .  .  84 

Notes 84 

Roger  Williams  Letter        .  .  .  .  .  85 

Opening  of  South  County  Museum 

bv  William  Davis  Miller    .  ...  .  93 





RHODE 
HISTORICAL 


ISLAND 

SOCIETY 


COLLECTIONS 


Vol.  XXVII 


JULY,  1934 


No.  3 


H.  Anthony  Dyer,  President         Gilbert  A.  Harrington,  Treasurer 
Howard  W.  Preston,  Secretary  Howard  M.  Chapin,  Librarian 


The  Society  assumes  no  responsibility  for  the  statements  or  the  opinions 
of  contributors. 


Portrait  of  Governor  Jenckes 

The  original  oil  portrait  of  Governor  Joseph  Jenckes, 
which  was  painted  by  Smibert  in  1729,  was  recently  ac- 
quired by  Mr.  Millard  H.  Jencks  of  New  York,  through 
whose  courtesy,  it  is  reproduced  on  the  cover  of  this  issue 
of  the  Collections. 

Mr.  Jencks  writes:  "The  picture  is  signed  at  right,  CJ. 
Smibert,  fecit'  and  dated  1729.  On  the  back  of  the  portrait 
is  a  piece  of  old  tape  on  which  is  written: 

'Joseph  Jenckes,  aetitis  73 — given  by 
him  unto  Governor  Ward.' 

"It  appears  that  the  portrait  was  in  the  collection  of 
Governor  Richard  Ward  of  Rhode  Island  for  a  number  of 
years  and  subsequently  in  the  collection  of  Mary  S.  Ward, 
descendant  of  Governor  Ward.  It  was  subsequently  pur- 
chased for  the  Burlingham  collection  of  early  American 
portraits.  I  do  not  have  the  date  on  which  this  purchase  was 
made.  The  portrait  was  exhibited  at  the  Gallery  of  National 
Portraiture,  Pennsvlvania  Academv  of  Fine  Arts,  Phila- 
delphia 1926." 


66  RHODE    ISLAND    HISTORICAL    SOCIETY 

Providence  in  Civil  War  Days* 

By  Theodore  Collier 

No  son  of  Rhode  Island  should  need  to  be  reminded 
that  to  his  State  belongs  the  distinction  of  having  been  the 
first  of  the  States  to  step  forward  for  the  defense  of  the 
National  Government.  Early  in  1861,  three  months  be- 
fore Ft.  Sumter  was  fired  upon,  Governor  Sprague  offered 
the  services  of  the  militia  for  the  protection  of  the  Capital. 
Although  assured  that  there  was  no  occasion  for  the  employ- 
ment of  troops,  the  Governor  renewed  the  offer,  through 
Major  Goddard,  who  went  to  Washington,  where  he  had 
an  interview  with  General  Scott.  "I  wish  I  had  those  fel- 
lows," said  the  gray  hero  of  the  Mexican  war;  "I  know 
the  stuff  they  are  made  of.  In  the  war  of  1 8  1 2  I  commanded 
all  the  New  England  troops,  and  I  must  say  that  for  brav- 
ery, for  resolute  endurance  of  fatigue  and  privation,  for 
steadiness  under  trials,  for  high  personal  character,  in  fact 
for  all  the  qualities  which  make  a  good  soldier,  the  soldiers 
of  the  regiment  composed  chiefly  of  Rhode  Island  men 
were  the  very  best  troops  I  commanded." 

General  Scott,  however,  was  not  free  to  act  according  to 
his  judgment  of  the  necessities  of  the  situation.  But  when 
the  time  for  action  did  come,  Rhode  Island  gave  ample 
proof  that  the  boys  of  '6 1  were  not  unworthy  of  their  sires 
of  1812. 

The  attack  on  Ft.  Sumter,  April  12,  1861,  had  but  one 
meaning,  War!  "The  issue  is  joined,"  wrote  the  editor  of 
the  Journal;  "there  is  no  longer  any  neutral  ground."  The 
news  brought  Rhode  Island  to  her  feet.  The  Assembly  was 
at  once  convened  in  extra  session;  the  Governor  offered  the 
State's  troops  to  the  Government  again  anticipating  the 
President's  call  for  volunteers.  Col.  Burnside  tendered  his 
services  to  the  State;  the  General  Assembly  voted  $500,000 

*A  paper  read  before  The  Review  Club,  February  9,  1918. 


PROVIDENCE  IN    CIVIL  WAR  DAYS  67 

to  fit  out  the  troops;  the  banks  came  forward  with  loans;  a 
quarter  of  a  million  was  subscribed  in  a  day  j  within  a  month 
the  sum  had  risen  to  half  a  million.  The  various  military 
companies  of  the  city,  the  First  Light  Infantry,  the  National 
Cadets,  the  Providence  Artillery,  the  Marine  Artillery,  the 
Mechanics  Rifles  and  others,  opened  their  lists  for  recruits. 
A  meeting  was  called  at  the  Armory  j  the  crowd  filled  the 
place  and  overflowed  into  the  street  ;  the  Governor  spoke, 
"He  would  go  himself  ,Vith  a  thousand  men,"  tremendous 
enthusiasm;  75  men  volunteered  on  the  spot;  before  next 
sunset,  1 1 5  more.  And  that  was  but  one  company.  The  scene 
was  being  repeated  in  a  score  of  places.  Everywhere  meet- 
ings; everywhere  impassioned  orators  pressing  the  claims  of 
country  and  the  one  duty  of  the  hour.  Drum  and  trumpet 
took  up  the  refrain;  the  chimes  of  Grace  Church  caught  the 
martial  note  and  flung  it  out,  to  be  borne  on  the  wind 
through  all  the  country  side.  And  thus  to  the  call  of  bell  and 
bugle,  with  quick-beating  heart,  but  with  set  face,  Rhode 
Island  fell  into  line. 

Major  Burnside's  offer  of  service  having  been  accepted, 
he  received  command  of  the  First  Rhode  Island  Volunteers. 
Regimental  headquarters  were  established,  in  Broad  Street, 
and  rapidly  the  ranks  were  filled. 

The  1 7th  day  was  a  day  of  patriotic  demonstrations.  The 
city  was  bedecked  with  flags;  volunteering  was  brisk;  many 
out-of-town  military  organizations  came  up;  there  was  a 
parade,  and  a  general  inspection  at  the  armories.  The  war- 
fever  was  running  high;  everyone  was  infected,  but  the 
young  took  it  hardest.  The  High  School  pupils  ran  up  a 
banner  inscribed  "Young  America" ;  the  Brown  Freshmen 
held  a  meeting,  and,  after  the  customary  "whereases" 
formally  resolved  that  they  approved  of  the  policy  of  the 
President  and  that  their  hearts  beat  with  patriotic  sympathy 
toward  those  of  their  classmates  who  had  already  enlisted. 
At  five  o'clock  the  whole  college  gathered  to  unfurl  Old 
Glory  over  University  Hall,  and  to  listen  to  the  stirring 
words  of  President  Sears,  Bishop  Clark,  Dr.  Hall,  Dr. 
Caldwell,  and  Governor  Dyer. 


68  RHODE  ISLAND  HISTORICAL  SOCIETY 

That  was  the  beginning  of  flag-raising.  Thereafter  not 
a  day  passed  without  its  flag-raising,  until,  it  would  seem, 
every  school  and  church  and  place  of  business  had  shown  its 
colors.  A  great  staff,  1 40  feet  high,  was  erected  at  the  junc- 
tion of  Broad  and  High  Streets,  and  a  flag  run  up  by  a  patri- 
arch who  was  a  lad  of  twelve  when  Betsy  Ross  stitched  the 
first  Stars  and  Stripes.  Another  staff  was  set  up  at  the  east 
end  of  India  Bridge,  and  dedicated  by  Bishop  Clark.  But 
high  above  them  all  floated  the  flag  from  the  steeple  of  the 
First  Baptist  Meeting  House,  1  80  feet  from  the  ground. 

Then,  as  now,  prices  went  up  with  the  flags.  From  $5  they 
jumped  to  nearly  $30, — all  the  fault  of  England,  said 
some,  because  she  has  a  corner  on  bunting. 

"Old  men  and  children-  young  men  and  maidens ;"  but 
where  were  the  women:  Sewing,  sisters,  sewing!  For  there 
was  work  to  be  done.  Our  boys  must  be  fitted  out;  not  in 
olive  drab,  called  for  by  the  regulations  and  provided  by 
the  Government;  but  more  gaily  appareled,  in  gray  and 
blue,  gray  for  the  pantaloons,  blue  for  the  tunic;  and  a 
black  felt  hat,  trimmed  with  a  cockade  and  crowned  with  a 
feather.  The  materials  for  the  tunics  were  to  be  found  at 
the  store  of  H.  A.  Prescott,  and  the  ladies  were  asked  to 
call  at  once,  for  "the  work  must  be  done  by  tonight;"  so 
ran  the  notice.  And  as  if  to  challenge  northern  pride  and 
incite  to  more  strenuous  exertion,  this  urgent  appeal  was 
followed  by  a  news  item  to  the  effect  that  the  Rebels  had 
already  made  "two  breaches  in  Ft.  Sumter." 

The  honor  of  the  State  was  in  the  hands  of  its  daughters; 
and  it  was  safe.  A  thousand  tunics  given  out  one  day;  300 
finished  garments  returned  by  noon  of  the  next!  How  the 
needles  must  have  flown!  It  was  an  achievement  worthy  of 
the  city  already  famous  as  the  home  of  the  Wilcox  and 
Gibbs.  Indeed,  there  was  not  work  enough  to  go  around. 
But  the  willingness  of  every  volunteer  was  counted  to  her 
for  patriotism,  and  bandages  and  blankets  soon  found  occu- 
pation for  hands  that  could  not  be  employed  on  tunics.  With 
just  pride  might  the  Journal  exclaim,  "The  patriotic  spirit 
of  our  Grandmothers  had  not  died  out." 


PROVIDENCE  IN   CIVIL  WAR  DAYS  69 

"Old  men  for  counsel j  young  men  for  war,"  runs  the 
proverb  j  which,  translated  into  the  feminine,  means, 
"Matrons  for  tunics,  maidens  for  head-gear".  While  moth- 
ers sewed,  the  nimbler  fingers  of  their  daughters  deftly 
shaped  cockades  and  trimmed  hats.  Did  anyone,  perchance, 
as  she  bestowed  a  finishing  touch  upon  a  gay  feather,  secretly 
set  a  cap  of  her  own  for  some  soldier  boy,  whom  War's 
approach  had  made  for  her  "one  in  a  thousand,"  in  a  sense 
not  strictly  regimental?" I  wonder!  The  girls  of  the  High 
School  and  of  the  Bridgham  Street  School  petitioned  for  a 
holiday,  "in  order  that  they  might  assist  in  the  patriotic 
work."  Alas,  they  were  denied!  Why  is  it  that  School 
Boards  never  understand? 

But  no  one  who  wished  to  work  need  long  be  idle.  When 
the  last  tunic  had  been  made  and  the  last  hat  trimmed,  when 
trousers  and  shoes  and  belts  had  been  sent  down  from 
Boston,  when  blankets  and  extra  shirts  had  been  provided, 
there  remained  one  need,  perpetual,  insatiable,  a  need 
which  cried  continually,  like  the  horse  leech's  daughter, 
"Give,  give!",  a  need  which  yawned  like  the  chasm  in  the 
Forum,  demanding  the  last  full  measure  of  sacrifice, — the 
need  of  socks!  So  the  needles  were  set  up,  and  woman 
enlisted  for  the  period  of  the  war.  No  skirted  creature  was 
exempt.  Nay,  even  the  boys  in  the  Reform  School  were  set 
to  knitting.  Socks  recognized  no  distinction  of  class,  and 
spared  no  age  j  from  the  little  girl  in  pigtails  to  the  grannie 
in  the  chimney  corner,  the  women  of  Rhode  Island  knitted, 
their  clicking  needles  keeping  time  to  the  "Tramp,  tramp, 
tramp"  of  marching  boys.  One  old  lady  of  80,  nameless, 
yet  deserving  fame,  had  turned  out  100  pairs  between 
Bull  Run  and  Atlanta,  when  I  lost  count.  And  though  now 
her  needles  lie  a-rusting  on  the  shelf,  who  doubts  that 
tonight,  reincarnate  in  some  granddaughter,  her  "soul  goes 
marching  on,"  knitting  two  and  purling  two,  turning  out 
sweaters  or  helmets  for  the  "boys  over  there"? 

One  thing  more, — the  regiment  must  have  its  colors  j 
none  but  a  woman's  hand  could  meet  that  need.  And  on  the 
19th,  the  anniversary  of  Lexington,  the  women  of  Provi- 


70  RHODE    ISLAND    HISTORICAL    SOCIETY 

dencc  presented  to  the  1st  Rhode  Island  a  banner  with  the 
words,  "With  this  banner  Rhode  Island  places  her  honor 
in  your  hands."  It  was  trust  well  reposed. 

The  next  day,  the  20th,  they  were  "off  for  the  front," 
not  all  of  them,  but  45  of  each  100,  "the  best-drilled  and 
the  most  experienced."  The  day  was  beautiful,  and  the 
streets  were  thronged  with  eager  spectators.  The  picked 
contingents  were  assembled  in  Exchange  Place.  Col.  Burn- 
side,  every  inch  a  soldier  and  even  then  a  general  in  the 
making,  was  in  command.  Most  of  us  can  see  him  only  with 
the  mind's  eye,  aided  by  what  has  been  handed  down  in 
portrait  or  statue.  But  some  there  are,  and  some  of  them 
with  us  tonight,  upon  whose  memory  his  knightly  figure 
was  indelibly  etched,  and  who  now,  after  the  lapse  of  nearly 
sixty  years,  see,  as  clearly  as  if  it  were  but  yesterday,  that 
superb  horseman  reviewing  his  troops  as  they  filed  past  the 
spot  where  today  horse  and  rider  still  stand  immortalized 
in  imperishable  bronze. 

The  Governor  and  his  staff  were  present.  After  the 
review  came  an  address  by  Bishop  Clark,  and  then  the  order 
"March!"  Out  through  Exchange  Place  they  swung,  up 
North  Main  Street  through  Meeting  to  Benefit,  and  down 
Benefit  Street  to  Fox  Point,  followed  by  a  countless  throng 
and  cheered  at  every  step.  When  they  reached  the  wharf 
enthusiasm  passed  all  bounds.  "The  sweet  notes  of  the  band, 
and  the  glittering  array  of  muskets  were  at  this  moment  the 
signal  for  an  outburst  of  applause  from  the  thousands  who 
had  lined  the  vessels  and  standing  places  in  the  vicinity  of 
the  wharf,  which  indicated  the  depth  and  heartiness  of  the 
controlling  sentiment."  As  the  "Empire  State"  which  bore 
them  drew  away,  "round  upon  round  of  applause,  from  old 
and  young,  greeted  her  and  the  living  freight  on  her  decks. 
The  waving  of  handkerchiefs  and  the  tossing  of  hats  were 
but  the  slightest  evidences  of  the  deep  feeling  that  per- 
vaded the  dense  mass.  Grief  in  its  varied  forms  was  there, 
and  as  the  steamer  gradually  receded  from  view  the  moist- 
ened eyes  of  many  a  one  told  of  the  fondness  of  the  human 
heart."  They  are  going;  we  follow  them  with  eyes  and 


PROVIDENCE  IN    CIVIL  WAR  DAYS  71 

voices  ;  now  they  have  passed  beyond  the  reach  of  the  loud- 
est "Good-bye" ;  still  over  the  water  come  "the  full  rich 
strains  of  Joe  Greene's  bugle";  now  even  those  have  died 
away  in  silence;  the  last  farewell  is  spoken  by  the  old  Flag, 
the  flag  for  whose  honor  the  boys  are  going  forth  to  fight. 
Never,  I  venture  to  think,  had  Old  Glory  seemed  more 
glorious  to  those  who  saw  it  waving  in  the  marvelous  light 
of  that  April  afternoon. 

However  much  doubt  might  assail  the  hearts  of  others, 
there  was  one,  at  least,  aboard  that  boat  who  counted  upon 
a  safe  and  speedy  return,  Joe  Greene,  the  sweet  bugler,  the 
leader  of  the  American  Brass  Band.  Joe  had  not  only  the 
musical  temperament,  he  had  a  soul  of  honor.  His  22nd 
Annual  Band  Concert  had  been  advertised  and  tickets  sold 
therefor.  But  Joe's  word  was  as  good  as  his  note;  the  very 
day  he  sailed  away  he  informed  the  public  through  the 
columns  of  the  Journal  that  if  he  returned  from  the  cam- 
paign the  concert  would  be  given  and  the  tickets  would  be 
good.  Heaven  recorded  the  vow  and  graciously  enabled 
him  to  fulfill  it. 

Doubtless  there  were  many  who  shared  Joe's  hope  and 
belief  that  "the  campaign"  would  soon  be  over.  Even  the 
President's  first  call  had  been  for  volunteers  for  ninety 
days;  but  days  were  to  stretch  into  months,  and  months 
into  years  before  the  last  of  Rhode  Island's  boys  should 
come  back.  No  one  probably  foresaw  the  full  duration  of 
the  war;  but  some,  at  least,  more  skilled  in  reading  the  signs 
of  the  times,  anticipated  a  protracted  and  bitter  struggle, 
and  sounded  a  warning  against  an  easy  and  delusive  opti- 
mism. "This  is  no  boy's  play,"  wrote  the  editor  of  the 
Journal  (April  22,  1861);  "In  the  beginning  we  have 
great  apprehension  of  temporary  reverses;  to  doubt  the 
ultimate  result  would  be  worse  than  to  doubt  the  superior- 
ity of  numbers  and  strength  and  resources ;  it  would  be  to 
doubt  the  justice  of  Heaven"  (April  24,  1861  ).  "But  we 
have  just  begun;  we  must  go  on;  there  is  no  halting  now; 
there  must  be  greater  preparations ;  we  need  two  more  regi- 
ments, also  a  Home  Guard;  let  companies  be  formed;  let 


72  RHODE  ISLAND  HISTORICAL  SOCIETY 

everybody  drill;  don't  wait  for  guns;  drill!  prepare!  Stand 
by  the  President;  stop  grumbling  and  go  to  work!  Enlist! 
And  thank  Heaven  for  being  young  and  having  such  an 
opportunity  of  serving  your  country." 

Such  warnings  and  exhortations  fell  not  upon  deaf  ears. 
Guards  were  formed;  companies  were  organized;  every- 
where men  were  drilling;  the  contagion  spread  to  all  parts 
of  the  city  and  among  all  classes.  The  Old  Guard  of  the 
First  Light  Infantry  and  the  men  of  the  First  Ward  were 
among  the  hrst  to  organize.  But  in  a  moment  every  ward 
had  its  Home  Guard  or  its  company  of  volunteers;  many 
could  boast  of  both.  Besides  there  were  the  National  Cadets, 
the  Mechanics  Guard  (formed  among  the  men  at  the 
Corliss  Engine  Works),  the  Horse  Guards,  the  Irish  Amer- 
ican Guards. 

The  Brown  students  formed  a  Corps,  fifty  strong,  under 
Capt.  C.  F.  Mason;  and  a  brave  show  they  made  in  their 
dark  blue  jackets,  blue  trousers,  and  jaunty  scarlet  caps. 
But  for  brilliancy  of  plumage  there  were  no  birds  as  gay 
as  the  Burnside  Zouaves, — "blue  jacket,  trimmed  with 
orange ;  full  red  pants,  gathered  at  the  ankles ;  drab  gaiters ; 
blue  mixed  undershirt,  faced  with  red;  and  white  forage 
cap  trimmed  with  red!  "  The  example  of  sires  was  followed 
by  their  sons;  the  Union  Guard,  of  lads  from  eight  to 
fourteen,  drilled  and  paraded  under  the  able  leadership  of 
Capt.  Nehemiah  R.  Knight,  of  equal  age.  Was  it  Capt. 
Knight's  company,  I  wonder,  that  provoked  the  protest  of 
one  who  signed  herself,  "Much  annoyed  Mother,"  against 
incessant  drumming  by  half-grown  boys?  "Patriotism  is 
all  right,"  she  allowed;  "but  waking  up  babies  every  five 
minutes  till  ten  o'clock  at  night  is  all  wrong!"  About  the 
same  time  there  appeared  in  the  paper  a  bit  of  gratuitous 
advice  for  prospective  soldiers,  which  the  "Annoyed 
Mother"  must  have  read  with  heartfelt  approvel, — "Let 
your  beard  grow  and  save  your  throat."  Parenthetically 
and  by  way  of  contrast,  one  may  be  permitted  to  allude  to 
the  counsel  which  Dr.  Patten  once  gave  to  some  "soldiers  of 
the  Cross"  about  to  set  forth  from  Princeton  Seminary  for 


PROVIDENCE  IN    CIVIL  WAR  DAYS 


73 


the  mission  field, — "Pray  without  ceasing,  and  shave  every 
day!" 

Meanwhile,  on  the  24th  of  April,  the  second  detachment 
of  the  regiment  had  left  for  the  front,  under  the  command 
of  Lieut.-Col.  Joseph  S.  Pitman.  They,  too,  were  given  an 
enthusiastic  and  hearty  send-off,  and  as  if  to  fan  their 
patriotism  to  whiter  heat,  were  accompanied  on  their  march 
to  the  wharf  by  the  old  flag  carried  by  the  Rhode  Island 
Regiment  of  the  Line  in  the  Revolution,  borne  on  this 
occasion  by  Major  John  B.  Chace. 

By  the  beginning  of  May  the  first  Rhode  Island,  1350 
strong,  had  pitched  their  tents  in  Washington  and  settled 
down  to  a  soldier's  life  at  "Camp  Sprague,"  so-named 
after  the  dashing  young  Governor  who  claimed  the  privi- 
lege of  impetuous  and  generous  youth,  and  followed  the 
flag,  not  only  to  camp  but  into  battle  itself.  Inasmuch  as 
the  Lieutenant-Governor,  Arnold,  had  previously  (April 
8th  )  gone"  off  in  command  of  the  Marine  Artillery,  the 
government  of  Rhode  Island  and  Providence  Plantations 
devolved  upon  the  Hon.  the  Secretary  of  State. 

Though  as  to  size  "Little  Rhody"  might  be  "least  of  all 
among  the  princes  of  Judah,"  her  smallness  was  not  of  the 
heart.  She  was  a  "good  provider,"  and  sent  her  boys  out 
well-clothed  and  well-stocked.  She  knew  what  her  men- 
folks  liked,  and  to  the  twenty  days'  rations  added  "other 
descriptions  of  food  not  ordinarily  served,  but  the  want  of 
which  would  be  felt  by  men  unaccustomed  to  active  mili- 
tary life."  Little  wonder  that,  to  quote  from  a  contempo- 
rary war  correspondent,  the  regiment  was  "much  admired 
for  the  solid  appearance  of  its  members.  They  evidently 
live  after  the  fashion  of  their  forefathers,  who  were  famous 
for  their  good  cheer"  {New  York  Express). 

And  Rhode  Island  had  every  reason  to  feel  proud  of  the 
result  of  good  feeding,  good  tailoring,  and  good  discipline. 
"More  admired  than  any  other  regiment  in  Washington," 
said  the  New  York  Evening  Post,  of  our  First ;  in  their 
uniform  of  dark  blue,  with  a  Kossuth  hat,  turned  up  at  one 
side ;  and  they  have  each  a  light  scarlet  blanket  which  they 


74  RHODE   ISLAND  HISTORICAL  SOCIETY 

wear  with  an  inimitable  grace,  pinning  it  in  the  shape  of  a 
coat,  with  a  skill  unattainable  to  ordinary  mortals."  "A 
model  to  be  carefully  studied  and  faithfully  copied,"  wrote 
the  New  York  Tribune;  "First  in  general  esteem,"  said 
the  Journal  of  Commerce.  Even  Boston  was  impressed,  and 
acknowledged  that  we  made  an  "imposing  appearance" 
( Boston  Journal). 

The  Marine  Artillery,  the  hrst  battery  of  rifled  cannon 
ever  in  the  service  of  the  United  States,  was  also  the  recipi- 
ent of  many  compliments.  Already  the  men  of  the  First 
had  given  proof  of  the  stuff  they  were  made  of,  on  the  long 
march  from  Frederick  to  Williamsport,  thirty-four  miles 
in  seventeen  hours,  a  feat  which  seemed  impossible  even 
for  Regulars.  "We  never  could  have  done  it  but  for 
Burnside;  Burnside  walked  to  encourage  the  men;  we  can 
go  anywhere  with  Burnside,"  wrote  "Canonicus,"  whose 
letters  to  the  Journal  were  a  vital  link  between  the  boys  at 
the  front  and  the  folks  back  home.  Where  shall  we  find 
words,  cries  "Canonicus,"  to  describe  a  "State  which  sends 
a  Governor  who  trudges  through  the  heat  and  dust  like  a 
private,  a  Colonel  who  only  asks  his  men  to  fare  as  he  does 
himself,  and  a  Chaplain  (Woodbury)  who  limits  his  dis- 
courses to  fifteen  minutes!" 

The  swearing-in,  May  4,  took  place  in  the  presence  of 
President  Lincoln;  and  at  the  conclusion  of  the  impressive 
ceremony  the  boys  gave  the  President  "three  cheers  and  a 
Narragansett!"  How  well  Rhode  Island  "kept  the  faith," 
let  the  Government  itself  be  witness:  "When  in  aftertimes," 
wrote  Secretary  Seward  to  Governor  Sprague  (  September 
5,  1  861  ),  "it  shall  be  asked  which  of  the  thirty-four  States 
was  most  loyal  and  most  effective  in  saving  our  country 
from  ruin  in  its  present  peril,  the  State  of  Rhode  Island 
will  have  no  fear  that  her  traditional  fame  will  suffer  in 
the  answer  that  shall  be  given." 

On  the  30th  of  May  the  call  came  for  additional  troops. 
Rhode  Island's  response  was  characteristically  prompt.  A 
second  regiment,  under  the  command  of  Col.  John  S. 
Slocum,    was   quickly    raised,    the    Providence    Artillery, 


I'ROYIDKNCE  IN    CIVIL   WAR  DAYS 


75 


National  Cadets,  City  Guards,  and  Mechanics  Rifles  enlist- 
ing in  a  body.  The  citizens,  as  before,  were  unsparing  in 
their  bounty;  Governor  Sprague's  firm  gave  a  thousand 
rubber  blankets;  everyone  contributed  according  to  his 
means;  the  hands  of  loyal  women  again  worked  the  colors, 
a  silk  flag  and  a  regimental  standard  of  blue,  bearing  the 
arms  of  the  State.  On  the  19th  of  June,  the  Second  left  for 
the  front,  accompanied  by  the  Governor,  the  Secretary  of 
State,  and  Bishop  Clark,  and  followed  by  prayers  from 
countless  hearts  that  beat  fast  with  mingled  pride  and 
apprehension.  For  by  this  time,  a  month  before  Bull  Run, 
it  required  no  prophet  to  tell  Rhode  Island  that  something 
was  impending. 

The  air  was  full  of  rumors,  and  the  strain  was  becoming 
intense.  The  people  hung  upon  the  latest  bulletin,  and 
anxiously  asked  what  might  happen  next.  The  uncertainty 
was  well-nigh  unendurable.  But  they  had  the  blessed  relief 
of  work.  "The  heart  will  be  stronger,  if  the  hands  are 
busy,"  wrote  the  editor  of  the  Journal;  and  every  fearful 
soul  knew  that  he  was  right.  And  how  they  worked,  men 
and  women  alike,  but  especially  the  women!  Morning 
after  morning  they  met  in  their  churches,  Grace,  Beneficent, 
Central,  First,  Westminster,  St.  Stephen's,  the  old  First 
Baptist,  and  all  the  rest  ( or  Dr.  Hall's,  Dr.  Swain's,  Dr. 
Caldwell's,  Dr.  Waterman's,  as  they  affectionately  called 
them,  after  their  Fathers  in  Christ ).  Morning  after  morn- 
ing they  met,  to  cut,  to  sew,  to  wind,  to  pack,  and  then  to 
cut  and  sew  again.  Or  else  they  knitted.  There  was  no  want 
of  materials  for  work;  Providence  kept  back  nothing. 

The  necessity  for  organization  was  seen  from  the  start. 
Within  a  week  after  the  departure  of  the  First  for  the  front, 
the  Rhode  Island  Relief  Corps  was  formed,  to  assist  the 
Hospital  Staff  in  caring  for  the  health  of  the  soldiers  and 
nursing  the  sick.  Soon  followed  a  Committee  of  Relief  for 
the  families  of  volunteers;  and  directly  upon  the  heels  of 
that  the  Ladies'  Voluntary  Relief  Association,  to  provide 
work  for  dependent  women,  and  thus  reduce  suffering  at 
home  while  ministering  to  the  absent  soldier.  The  Florence 


7(  i  RH(  IDE  ISLAND  HISTORICAL  SOCIETY 

Nightingale  Association,  comprising  women  of  many  de- 
nominations, meeting  in  the  Chapel  of  Dr.  Hall's  Church, 
made  their  contribution  in  hospital  supplies,  lint,  bandages, 
little  first-aid  kits,  and  the  like.  The  men,  not  to  be  behind 
in  the  good  work,  provided  an  ambulance,  built  under  the 
direction  of  Surgeon  Wheaton.  The  approach  of  summer 
called  for  "Havelocks,"  for  the  heat  of  Washington  was 
hard  on  the  boys  from  Narragansett.  The  brand  new  uni- 
forms of  April  were  beginning  to  show  the  effects  of  two 
months'  constant  wear,  and  little  fingers,  unequal  to  more 
exacting  tasks,  were  busy  making  pocket  pincushions,  always 
welcome,  wrote  "Canonicus,"  but  thrice  welcome  when 
stocked  with  needles  already  threaded. 

And  there  was  the  regimental  larder,  which  must  be  run- 
ning low.  There  was  nothing  for  it  but  to  replenish  it.  And 
knowing  "our  boys'  "  appetites,  nothing  short  of  a  shipload 
would  suffice.  So  they  loaded  the  "Sea  Gull"  to  the  gun- 
wales, with  things  terrestrial  and  things  celestial  (500 
Bibles,  forsooth),  things  perishable  and  things  imperish- 
able, things  digestible  and,  alas,  things  indigestible:  a 
"mountain  of  cake,"  40  bbls.  of  vegetables,  1000  lbs.  of 
tautog,  140  bu.  of  clams,  3  bbls.  of  cider  (June  cider!  ),  and 
to  show  that  there  were  no  hard  feelins',  a  "quantity  of 
pain-killer,"  amount  not  stated.  The  tautog  arrived,  we  are 
told,  in  a  "fair  state  of  preservation;"  the  clams,  alas,  suc- 
cumbed to  the  heat,  and  were  reluctantly  and,  I  suspect, 
irreverently  consigned  to  the  Chesapeake — shells  to  shells, 
bivalves  to  bivalves! 

But  the  sound  of  merriment  was  soon  to  give  way  to  that 
of  mourning.  Early  in  July,  death  first  claimed  the  redemp- 
tion of  the  pledge  of  patriotism ;  two  privates,  William 
Bourne  and  Nathan  Morse,  were  killed  by  the  explosion  of 
a  shell,  while  at  gun  practice.  Rhode  Island  had  laid  her  first 
dead  upon  the  altar  of  the  country.  It  was  an  earnest  of  the 
heavier  sacrifice  soon  to  be  exacted  of  her  on  the  fields  of 
Virginia. 

Scarce!}"  had  the  city  paid  its  funeral  honors  to  the  brave 


PROVIDENCE  IN    CIVIL   WAR  DAYS  77 

young  dead,  when  there  came  the  news  of  Bull  Run.  It  was 
at  first  announced  as  a  "brilliant  victory  for  the  national 
army."  For  the  space  of  a  day  Providence  was  jubilant ; 
then  the  ugly  truth  got  abroad, — the  Union  had  suffered  its 
first  defeat!  But  Rhode  Island  had  no  reason  to  be  ashamed 
of  her  part  in  the  sorry  affair.  Her  two  regiments,  united  in 
a  brigade  under  the  command  of  Burnside,  and  her  battery, 
had  acquitted  themselves  splendidly.  They  were  as  steady 
as  veterans  j  not  a  man  flinched.  There  could  be  no  flinching 
under  such  a  leader  as  Burnside.  His  was  the  coolest  head 
on  that  distracted  field.  "All  that  we  won  on  that  day,  and 
all  that  we  did  not  lose  we  owe,  under  God,  to  Col.  Burn- 
side," was  the  testimony  of  an  eye-witness. 

Such  was  Burnside,  patient,  firm,  sympathetic,  unremit- 
ting in  the  care  of  his  men,  ever  ready  to  endure  hardship 
as  a  fellow-soldier,  equally  steadfast  in  good  fortune  and 
ill,  wearing  his  laurels  with  unfeigned  modesty,  resolute  in 
adversity,  free  from  taint  of  bitterness  or  envy,  generous, 
magnanimous,  a  knight  without  reproach, — no  wonder  "his 
men  fairly  worshipped  him!"  It  was  true,  as  Governor 
Sprague  upon  a  later  occasion  said,  that  "No  man  in  the 
history  of  the  State  in  so  short  a  time  had  more  firmly  en- 
twined himself  around  the  hearts  of  our  people"  (August 
7,  1861,  at  Newport,  on  presenting  sword  and  thanks  for 
the  State). 

The  honor  of  Rhode  Island's  regiments  had  been  dearly 
bought.  In  killed,  wounded  and  missing  the  losses  num- 
bered 196.  Especially  the  2nd  suffered  heavily,  losing  her 
colonel,  the  gallant  Slocum,  Major  Ballou,  and  Captains 
Tower  and  Smith.  Among  those  who  fell  in  the  First  none 
died  more  regretted  or  left  a  more  fragrant  memory  than 
Lieut.  Prescott,  of  whom  it  was  written,  "No  man  went  to 
the  war  from  loftier  Christian  and  patriotic  motives  than 
he."  On  the  Sunday  following  the  battle,  a  service  com- 
memorative of  the  dead  was  held  in  Grace  Church.  The 
Bishop  spoke  in  healing  words  of  comfort  and  triumphing 
faith,  and  paid  the  tribute  of  honor  to  the  "heroic  Slocum  " 


7S  RHODE  ISLAND  HISTORICAL  SOCIETY 

"the  accomplished  Ballou,"  "Prescott,  the  Christian  sol- 
dier," and  "Comstock,  hardly  out  of  his  boyhood."  "The 
State  will  cherish  them  all  in  her  memory.,  as  heroes  of 
whom  we  shall  ever  be  proud,  and  whose  names  we  will 
teach  our  children  to  venerate  as  sacred."  In  the  following 
spring  the  bodies  of  Col.  Slocum,  Major  Ballou,  and  Cap- 
tain Tower  were  brought  back  home  and  interred  with  full 
military  honors.  And  the  record  of  Prescott,  the  "good  sol- 
dier of  Jesus  Christ"  is  preserved  on  a  memorial  tablet  in 
Grace  Church  Chapel. 

But  tears  of  joy  mingled  with  tears  of  grief  on  that  Sun- 
day after  Bull  Run.  The  First  returned  from  the  front, 
their  term  of  service  having  expired.  Although  it  was  early 
morning  when  they  arrived,  the  wharf  and  the  adjoining 
streets  were  crowded  with  thousands  who  had  come  out  to 
welcome  them  home.  Back  over  the  route  they  had  traversed 
three  months  before,  to  the  exhilarating  music  of  never- 
ending  cheers,  they  marched  to  Exchange  Place.  There  they 
drew  up  in  hollow  square,  their  gallant  Colonel  in  the 
centre.  And  the  display  of  enthusiasm  was  "magnificent," 
says  the  Journal.  But  for  me  the  picture  would  not  be  com- 
plete without  one  touch  added  by  one  who  although  then  a 
little  girl  still  recalls  the  scene  as  if  it  were  but  yesterday. 
"My  Mother,"  said  she,  "took  me  through  all  those  men, — 
and  oh,  but  they  were  travel-stained  and  unkempt!,  and 
lead  me  up  to  where  Col.  Burnside  sat  upon  his  horse,  and 
he  reached  down  and  shook  hands  with  me.  I  shall  never 
forget  it."  No  more  would  I. 

Bull  Run  had  ended  in  defeat.  But  was  Rhode  Island  dis- 
mayed? Not  for  one  moment!  "Defeat  is  only  an  argument 
for  new  effort,"  wrote  the  editor  of  the  Journal;  "Our 
banner  which  has  been  trailing  in  the  dust  must  be  lifted 
up  toward  the  stars  .  .  .  the  ranks  must  be  tilled  up  .  .  .  let 
us  begin  today.  Let  the  Government  say  when  and  whence 
it  wants  men,  and  they  shall  be  forthcoming.  Let  no  man 
lisp  the  word  'discouragement1  .  .  .  the  North  is  in  earnest, 
true  as  steel,  and  tough  as  oak."  To  such  a  clarion  call  the 


PROVIDENCE   IX    CIVIL   WAR  DAYS  79 

whole  city  rose  in  response.  The  great  mass  meeting  in 
Market  Square  was  such  an  exhibition  of  patriotic  feeling 
as  no  man  in  that  generation  had  ever  before  seen.  The 
Mayor  presided;  among  the  Vice  Presidents  were  Lieu- 
tenant-Governor Arnold,  Dr.  Wayland,  Professor  Caswell, 
J.  C.  Brown,  Governor  Hoppin,  A.  C.  Barstow,  R.  H.  Ives, 
James  B.  Angell.  "One  voice,  one  sentiment,  one  impulse 
moved  the  thousands  .gathered  in  council."  First  to  speak 
was  Thomas  A.  Jenckes.  He  was  followed  by  President 
Sears,  Dr.  Wayland,  Dr.  Hall,  Bishop  Clark  and  others. 
The  Right  Reverend  Bishop  was  stirred  to  his  very  depths. 
As  he  strode  into  the  Forum  that  day,  it  was  not  with  the 
"preparation  of  the  Gospel  of  peace"  that  his  feet  were 
shod.  "The  time  for  leniency  has  passed,"  he  shouted,  "the 
dispensation  of  hemp  has  commenced!"  The  vast  assembly 
rose  to  the  challenge  of  the  crisis,  and  with  a  mighty  shout 
pledged  their  fortunes  and  their  lives  to  preserve  the  nation 
and  uphold  its  honor.  And  Rhode  Island  kept  her  word! 
Let  a  neighboring  state  bear  witness:  "If  a  clear  head,  a 
sound  heart,  and  an  open  hand  constitute  greatness,  Rhode 
Island,  small  in  size,  may  be  considered  just  now  the  biggest 
state  in  the  Union  {Boston  Transcript). 

Another  regiment  and  another  battery  were  promptly 
raised;  the  lists  were  opened  for  two  companies  of  Chas- 
seurs and  a  third  battery;  and  a  third  regiment,  the  "Irish 
Regiment,"  so-called,  was  quickly  filled.  The  fever  was 
working  in  Rhode  Island's  blood.  From  far-off  California 
came  a  flag  for  the  Second  Regiment,  the  filial  gift  of  dis- 
tant sons  to  the  Mother  State.  All  through  the  late  summer 
and  the  fall  recruiting  went  steadily  on,  and  by  October 
Rhode  Island  had  four  thousand  men  at  the  front  or  in 
Washington.  And  when  1861  came  to  a  close,  looking  back 
over  her  year's  work,  she  could  pride  herself  on  having 
raised  four  regiments  and  eight  batteries  for  the  service  of 
the  Union.  Simultaneously  with  the  raising  of  regular 
troops,  proceeded  the  formation  of  new  units  of  the  Home 
Guard.  A  movement  was  set  on  foot  to  enrol  the  whole 


80  RHODE    ISLAND    HISTORICAL    SOCIETY 

body  of  male  citizens  into  companies  for  military  drill. 
About  forty  such  companies  were  organized. 

The  women  stood  shoulder  to  shoulder  with  the  men.  The 
work  of  relief  kept  even  pace  with  that  of  recruiting.  A 
branch  of  the  Sanitary  Commission  had  recently  been 
organized  and  was  making  an  effective  appeal  for  support 
and  contributions.  Up  to  the  close  of  1862  only  five  states 
had  made  larger  contributions  to  the  Sanitary  Commission 
than  Rhode  Island.  Early  in  August  the  Women's  Volun- 
teer Relief  Association  opened  headquarters  at  1 7  South 
Main  Street,  and  throughout  the  remainder  of  the  War 
their  offices  served  as  a  sort  of  central  bureau  for  the  col- 
lection and  forwarding  of  supplies  of  every  nature. 

Inevitably,  Bull  Run  had  affected  the  tone  of  community 
life;  it  was  pitched  in  a  lower  key;  it  was  more  intense.  But 
of  downright  pessimism  there  is  little  to  be  discovered. 
August  was  a  trying  month,  with  premature  talk  of  "peace 
with  the  erring  sisters  of  the  South  j"  with  misdirected, 
but  none  the  less  harmful,  criticism  of  the  Government;  with 
an  occasional  outcropping  of  the  evil  spirit  of  mob  violence. 
But  Providence  generally  kept  its  head  and  stood  fast  in 
the  conviction  that  all  would  yet  be  well.  This  was  no  one 
man's  doing;  it  was  the  work  of  a  conjuration  of  all  good 
men,  yea  and  good  women.  But  it  cost  a  mighty  effort! 
The  deeds  wrought  by  the  sword,  immortal  though  they 
be,  were  as  an  easy  triumph,  when  compared  with  the  vic- 
tory of  those  who  "through  faith  subdued  kingdoms  and 
turned  to  flight  armies.11  And  who  were  these:  Time  would 
fail  me  to  tell  of  them  all ;  their  name  is  Legion.  But  some 
there  were  of  higher  stature,  some  whose  clearness  of 
vision  and  whose  power  of  utterance  made  them  the  guides 
and  leaders  of  their  fellow-men,  the  molders  of  opinion, 
the  inspirers  of  great  undertakings.  And  among  these  one 
may,  without,  envy,  name  such  as  Dr.  YVayland,  President 
Sears,  Bishop  Clark,  Dr.  Hall,  Dr.  Caldwell,  Dr.  Swain, 
Governor  Hoppin,  Senator  Anthony,  Mayor  Knight,  C.  A. 


PROVIDENCE  IN   CIVIL  WAR  DAYS  81 

Updike,  A.  C.  Barstow,  T.  A.  Jenckes,  Mayor  Doyle,  Abra- 
ham Payne. 

And  there  is  another,  one  whose  voice  was  less  frequently 
heard  on  public  platforms,  but  who  wrought  with  powerful 
pen,  shaping  the  thoughts  of  thousands,  James  B.  Angell, 
the  editor  of  the  Journal.  As  a  mighty  rock  in  a  weary  land 
were  his  editorials  in  those  early  years  of  the  War,  when 
delay  and  defeat  taxedjpatience  and  faith  to  the  uttermost, 
when  even  the  strong  were  assailed  by  doubt  and  fear.  His 
faith  was  unshakable ;  he  never  despaired  of  the  Republic ; 
however  dark  the  sky,  he  resolutely  set  his  face  toward  the 
light.  No  faint-heart  he,  to  be  cowed  by  disaster ,  nor  yet  a 
shallow  optimist,  trusting  to  lucky  stars.  He  saw,  and  there- 
fore he  believed.  He  saw,  with  the  eye  of  a  prophet,  the 
issues  involved  in  the  struggle ;  and  once  he  had  seen  them, 
he  could  no  more  doubt  the  final  outcome  than  he  could 
question  the  Eternal  Justice.  "Let  us  remember,"  he  wrote 
in  August  1861,  when  sickening  fear  lay  on  the  hearts  of 
thousands  and  men  were  already  talking  of  compromise, 
"Let  us  remember  that  we  are  acting  our  part  in  an  arena  on 
which  a  cloud  of  witnesses  are  looking ;  that  we  are  right- 
ing not  only  for  regulated  liberty  here,  but  for  the  cause  of 
free  institutions  everywhere  ...  let  us  bear  in  mind  that  mil- 
lions of  hearts  across  the  water  are  throbbing  with  anxiety 
in  our  behalf,  and  praying  that  victory  may  rest  upon  our 
standards.  Let  us  rise  to  some  appreciation  of  the  magni- 
tude, the  far-reaching  results,  the  world-wide  significance 
of  the  great  struggle  in  which  we  are  engaged.  The  victory 
is  not  to  be  won  by  men  of  fitful  impulse,  but  by  the  men 
of  steady  and  persistent  courage,  the  men  who  find  in  de- 
feats arguments  and  stimulus  for  new  and  mightier  efforts" 
(August  26,  1861).  Day  after  day  with  untiring  persistence 
he  preached  this  saving  gospel  of  implicit  confidence  in  the 
great  cause,  which  could  not,  must  not,  fail,  and  of  whole- 
hearted support  of  him  to  whom  its  guardianship  had  been 
committed, — "Trust  the  President,  stand  by  the  Govern- 
ment!" His  logic  was  invincible ;  his  words  burnt  them- 


82  RHODE  ISLAND  HISTORICAL  SOCIETY 

selves  into  the  mind.  He  struck  hard,  but  never  with  malice  j 
he  could  wield  the  lash  of  rebuke,  but  never,  not  once,  did 
a  single  scurrilous  word  fall  from  his  pen.  Capable  of  deep 
feeling,  for  he  had  a  poet's  sensitiveness,  he  never  allowed 
passion  to  obscure  his  vision  nor  distort  his  judgment.  His 
every  utterance  was  sane  and  j  udicious. 

The  influence  of  such  an  imperturbable  soul  was  irresist- 
ible. Minds  temporarily  dazed  by  disaster  recovered  their 
poise  j  drooping  spirits  revived,  and  with  the  coming  of 
September  the  town  took  on  a  more  cheerful  air.  Bull  Run 
was  a  sorry  failure,  but  after  all,  they  said,  it  was  not  irre- 
parable j  the  blockade  was  a  success  j  McClellan  was  "organ- 
izing victory"  j  the  boys  at  the  front  were  well  and  in  the 
best  of  spirits  ( as  anyone  might  know  from  the  letters  of 
"Canonicus,"  "Wampanoag,"  "Narragansett,"  and  "What 
Cheer,  Jr."  which  appeared  almost  daily  in  the  Journal). 
Business  was  improving  j  several  firms  had  contracts  for 
army  cloth  j  cotton  was  high,  20c,  but  the  mills  were  still 
supplied  j  the  Providence  Tool  Company  had  a  contract  for 
25,000  muskets  j  Mansfield  and  Lamb  were  making  bayo- 
nets -j  Corliss  and  Nightingale  were  making  breech-loading 
cannon;  a  company  had  been  formed  to  manufacture  the 
Burnside  rifle.  So  there  was  plenty  of  work,  good  prices,  and 
general  contentment. 

If  there  were  any  idle  hands  in  Providence  they  surely 
were  not  those  of  women.  But  two  months  in  existence,  and 
the  Ladies  Volunteer  Relief  Association  had  already  col- 
lected and  forwarded  12,500  garments,  to  say  nothing  of 
towels,  socks,  handkerchiefs  and  minor  accessories;  had 
given  work  to  522  needy  women,  and  had  paid  out  $2,000. 
The  managers  fully  merited  the  Journal's  praise  as  "ladies 
of  large  experience,  excellent  judgment,  and  warm  sympa- 
thies." All  through  the  War,  with  unflagging  energy  these 
devoted  women  carried  on  this  beneficent  work,  and  no 
statistics  can  give  an  adequate  idea  of  the  service  they 
rendered. 

The  Sanitary  Commission  was  not  a  whit  behind  in  rais- 
ing contributions  of  money  and  supplies  for  the  sick  and 


PROVIDENCE  IN    CIVIL   WAR  DAYS  83 

wounded.  The  children,  too,  did  their  bit:  the  pupils  at 
the  Arnold  Street  Grammar  School  sent  in  forty-two  com- 
forts, seven  quilts,  three  blankets,  one  pair  of  mittens,  all 
their  own  work.  From  the  children  of  the  Prospect  Street 
School  came  qui  Its ;  two  little  boys  gave  up  their  feather 
pillows  for  sick  soldiers  and  said  they  "would  make  their 
bolsters  do."  With  truth  might  "Canonicus"  write  back 
home,  "No  State  surpassed,  and  few  equalled,  Rhode 
Island  in  her  care  of  her  troops." 

Incidentally,  those  hospital  boxes  were  not  all  pillows 
and  mittens.  A  list  of  their  contents  reads  like  a  grocer's 
inventory  j  every  conceivable  sort  of  food  was  included. 
And  not  only  food.  Smuggled  away  between  blankets  and 
bandages  was  many  a  bottle  of  good  cheer  j  for  these  sis- 
ters of  mercy  bound  up  wounds,  after  the  manner  of  the 
Good  Samaritan,  "pouring  in  oil  and  wine."  And  for  wine 
they  laid  every  growing  thing  under  contribution, — elder- 
berry wine,  blackberry  wine,  strawberry  wine,  whortleberry 
wine,  currant  wine,  grape  wine,  cherry  wine,  claret  wine, 
Muscat  wine;  and  for  ballast,  cider!  Once  in  my  life  I  saw 
a  wine-card,  but  compared  with  this  list,  it  was  as  a  primer  in 
comparison  with  a  dictionary. 

Toward  the  close  of  October  the  day  of  Prayer  and  Fast- 
ing was  observed  in  all  the  Churches.  The  heart  of  the 
Nation  was  heavy;  for  again,  at  Manassas,  its  arms  had 
suffered  defeat.  Instinctively  it  turned  to  the  God  of  its 
Fathers,  and  in  repentance  and  supplication  found  strength 
and  peace.  But  it  was  hard,  waiting  for  victory.  The  war- 
news  was  far  from  encouraging.  McClellan's  army  wras  in- 
active. Burnside's  Roanoke  expedition,  although  ultimately 
successful,  met  with  many  delays  and  accidents,  and  they 
had  counted  upon  Burnside  and  his  Rhode  Island  reg- 
iments. Christmas  passed,  not  without  its  Christmas  boxes 
to  the  boys  at  the  front,  and  the  New  Year  entered,  and 
still  no  victory.  At  last,  about  the  middle  of  February,  came 
the  cheering  news  of  the  fall  of  Fort  Donelson,  and  the 
heart  of  the  North  revived.  The  Journal  hailed  it  as  "the 
decisive  battle  in  the  West,"  and  the  joy  of  the  city  found 


84  RHODE  ISLAND  HISTORICAL  SOCIETY 

vent  in  salutes,  the  ringing  of  bells  and  illuminations.  The 
chimes  of  Grace  Church  knew  only  patriotic  tunes  that 
night,  "Hail  Columbia,"  "Yankee  Doodle,"  "America," 
the  "Old  Bristol  March,"  and  the  "Marseillaise,"  the 
battle  hymn  of  democracy  the  world  over. 

{To  be  concluded} 


New  Publications  of  Rhode  Island  Interest 

he  Service  de  Sante  Franco-is  Pendant  la  Guerre  d'lnde- 
-pendance  des  Etats  Unis,  by  Maurice  Bouvet,  published 
at  Paris  in  1934,  is  a  monograph  of  1  1  1  pages  containing 
many  references  to  the  French  military  and  naval  hospitals 
in  Rhode  Island. 

History  and  Genealogy  of  the  haphan/.  Wells,  Storle 
(and)  Johnson  Families  by  Olene  Lapham,  1934,  is  a  pri- 
vately printed  pamphlet  of  29  pages,  wrhich  contains  some 
Rhode  Island  genealogy. 

The  Gibbs  Family  of  Rhode  Island  by  George  Gibbs, 
New  York,  1 933,  is  a  beautiful  privately  printed  volume  of 
193  pages  with  twenty  illustrations. 

Reminiscences  of  East  Greenwich  by  Henry  E.  Turner, 
an  address  delivered  in  1891,  has  been  recently  re- 
published by  the  East  Greenwich  Free  Library  as  a  pam- 
phlet of  32  pages. 

Notes 

Miss  Marguerite  Appleton  has  been  elected  to  member- 
ship in  the  Society. 


85 


Important  Roger  Williams'  Letter 

The  letter  of  Roger  Williams,  which  was  recently  pur- 
chased by  Mr.  Frederick  S.  Peck  of  Barrington,  does  not 
appear  to  have  been  printed  in  full  before,  but  extracts  from 
it  were  printed  in  Backus'  "History  of  the  Baptists",  in  the 
Narragansett  Club  Publications,  in  the  Catalogue  of  the 
Terry  sale,  and  elsewhere.  Through  the  kindness  of  Mr. 
Peck  we  are  printing  this  letter  in  full. 

An  Answer  to  a  scandalous  papr  wch  came  to  my  hand  from 
the  Massachusets  clamouring  agst  the  purchase  &  sland- 
ering the  purchases  of  Qunnunnagut  Hand,  &  sub- 
scribed-by  John  Easton. 

The  good  providence  of  the  God  of  Truth  seemes  to  call 
me  to  discover  the  Truth  of  proceedings  touching  this 
Hand:  partly  as  it  hath  pleased  his  Mercy  to  use  me  as 
an  Instrumt,  betweene  the  English  of  Rode  Hand  &  the 
Natives  about  Rode  Hand,  Qunnunnagut  &  from  the 
beginning  partly,  as  I  have  bene  calld  out  by  Letters 
from  the  Massachuset  &  from  Rode  Hand,  as  allso  by 
Importunities  from  the  Natives  to  travell  in  this  busi- 
nes:  partly,  as  it  concernes  me  (in  many  respects)  some 
thing  more  then  every  one,  to  endeavour  the  peace  & 
Libertie  of  the  Colony  within  it  selfe,  &  betweene  this 
Colony  &  the  other  Colonies  &  the  Barbarians  round 
about  us.  And  lastly,  this  Fierbrand  having  bene  sent 
about  the  Countrey,  &  even  to  the  Gover  hand  of  the 
Massachuset,  &  from  his  to  mine,  I  judge  it  my  dutie 
not  to  be  unwilling  to  put  to  this  seasonable  hand  to 
quench  it. 

I  shall  first  premise  a  word  to  the  purchase  of  Rode  Hand 
with  the  Grasse  of  Qunnunnagut  &c  with  wch  this  papr 
begins 


86  RHODE  ISLAND  HISTORICAL  SOCIKTY 

I  have  acknowledged  (&  have  &  shall  Endeavor  to  main- 

taine)  the  Rights  &  proprieties  of  every  Inhabitant  of 
Rode  Hand  in  peace.  Yet  since  there  is  so  much  sound 
&  noyes  of  purchase  &  purchasers;  1  judge  it  not  un- 
seasonable to  declare  the  Rise  &  bottome  of  the  planting 
of  Rode  Hand  in  the  fountaine  of  it.  It  was  not  price  nor 
Money  tht  could  have  purchased  Rode  Hand.  Rode 
Hand  was  obtained  by  Love:  by  tht  Love  &  Favour  wch 
that  honble  Gentleman  Sr  Hen.  Vane  and  my  selfe  had 
with  tht  great  Sachim  Miantunnomu  about  the  Leauge, 
wch  I  procurd  betweene  the  Massachuset  English  &c.  & 
the  Narrigansets  in  the  Pequt  War. 

It  is  true,  I  advised  a  Gratuitie  to  be  presented  to  the  Sachim 
&  the  Natives  And  because  Mr.  Coddington,  &  the  rest 
of  my  Lo:  Countrimen  were  to  inhabite  the  place,  &  to 
be  at  the  charge  of  the  Gratuitie  I  drew  up  a  writing  in 
Mr.  Coddingtons  name,  &  the  names  of  such  of  my  Lo: 
Countrimen  as  came  up  with  him,  &  put  it  into  as  sure  a 
Forme  as  I  could  at  tht  time  (  amongst  the  Indians  )  for 
the  Benehte  &  Assurance  of  the  present  &  future  In- 
habitants of  the  Hand. 

This  I  mention  tht  as  tht  truely  noble  Sr  Flen.  Vane  hath 
bene  so  great  an  Instrumt  in  the  hand  of  God  for  the 
procuring  of  this  Hand  from  the  Barbarians  as  allso  for 
the  procuring  &  confirming  of  the  charter  So  it  may  by 
ail  due  &  thanckfull  acknowledgmt  be  remembred  & 
recorded  of  us  &  ours,  wch  reape  &  enjoy  the  Sweete 
fruits  of  so  great  Benehtes  &  such  unheard  of  Liberties 
amongst  us. 

Againe,  a  word  ( in  generall )  as  to  this  Hand  of  Qunnunna- 
gut,  the  truth  is,  tht  at  my  Earnest  motion,  tht  great 
Sachim  (aforesaid)  gave  us  leave  to  cut  the  grasse  of 
Qunnunnagut,  &  of  other  Hands  (  some  excepted  in  wch 
Mr.  Wintrop  &  my  selfe  had  interest ).  And  it  is  allso 
true,  tht  these  two  present  dissenting  Sachims  (with 
whom  John  Easton  joynes)  &i  their  Father  deceased, 
have  long  &  most  barbarously  abused  the  Inhabiants  of 


ROGER   WILLIAMS   LETTER  S7 

Rode  Hand,  about  the  cutting  of  Grasse  on  Qunnunna- 
gut,  driving  them  (for  their  peace  sake)  to  hire  &  pay 
for  at  extreame  rates,  their  owne  Grasse,  wch  the  former 
Great  Sachim  most  freely  granted  to  us.  In  wch  respect 
( to  end  the  barbarous  Controversie  &  wrong)  as  allso 
to  further  &  advance  tht  great  End  of  planting  &  subdu- 
ing this  barbarous  Countrey  to  English  Industrie  & 
Civilitie.  I  have  longed  for  &  rejoice  in  the  purchase  of 
this  Hand:  And  tl\t  rather  because,  as  it  lyeth  in  the 
bosome  of  the  Colony  &  so  convenient  for  Rode  Hand: 
So  it  pleased  the  right  honble  the  Councell  of  State,  by 
Authoritie  of  Parliamt,  to  nominate  this  Hand  in  one 
of  their  particular  expresses  relating  to  us. 

Now  as  to  the  charges  in  this  false  paper  agst  the  Purchasers 
(who  are  the  greatest  part  of  all  the  chiefe  Inhabitants 
of  Rode  Hand  both  Magistrates  &  others)  this  fowle 
mouth  clamors,  tht  they  are  false  &  prhdious,  &  ( in 
effect)  cheaters,  Drunckards,  Murtherers  &c. 

First,  false  &  prfidious,  because  being  appointed  by  the 
Towne  of  Newport  to  Purchase  it  for  the  Towne,  they 
Purchased  it  for  themselves. 

I  answer:  questionly  if  this  had  bene  the  case,  it  had  bene  a 
prfidious  Act:  but  this  is  not  the  case,  it  is  either  ignor- 
antly  or  enviously  mistaken,  &  so  represented  ugly:  I 
have  observed  &  examined  this  busines  to  the  bottome, 
&  I  find  not,  but  tht  as  to  ( the  substance  of )  the  pro- 
ceedings of  the  purchasers,  they  have  not  only  bene  just 
&  righteous,  but  allso  deliberate  &  prudent,  &  ( in  a 
manner )  unavoidable  &  necessary. 

For  the  truth  is,  this  busines  of  Qunnannagut  was  intangled 
&  clogd  with  many  thornie  Controveries  &  extreame 
difficulties,  the  English  at  Newport  have  bene  at  Long 
&  Constant  Contention  with  these  2  Young  Sachims  & 
their  Father,  about  the  cutting  the  Grasse  on  Qunnun- 
nagut.  And  it  is  the  wonderfull  mercy  of  God  tht  the 
English  &  Pagan  bloud  hath  not  bene  yearely  mixt 
togeather  about  this  matter:  In  So  much  tht  Such  of  the 


OO  RHODE  [SLAND  HISTORICAL  SOCIETY 

Inhabitants  as  had  Interest  in  these  Medowes  were 
forced  to  petition  the  Towne,  of  Newport,  in  their 
Towne  meeting;  either  to  stand  by  them  ( tht  is  by  force 
of  Armes)  in  the  cutting  of  their  Medowes,  or  else  to 
give  them  leave  to  make  a  New  Purchase  themselves. 

The  Towne  of  Newport  wrote  to  me  about  this  matter  & 
allso  to  chose  out  a  Committee  of  Six  men  to  Endeavor  a 

New  Purchase. 

Now  allso,  the  English  were  at  Controversie  amongst  them- 
selves about  a  New  Purchase:  Newport  and  Portsmouth 
could  not  agree  about  it.  Nor  the  Towne  of  Newport 
within  it  selfe:  And  those  very  Commrs  appointed  to 
make  the  Purchase  could  not  agree  in  whose  name  the 
Purchase  should  be  made,  whether  in  the  Towne  of 
Newports  name,  or  in  the  name  of  all  the  Inhabitants  of 
Rode  Hand;  &  there  fore  were  glad  to  pitch  upon  a 
third  tearme  Viz:  tht  they  would  Purchase  it  [  For  com- 
mon good.] 

Lastly  the  very  Acts  &  Orders  of  the  Towne  of  Newport 
were  at  Controversie  &  devided  one  agst  another  about 
this  matter.  By  one  Act  six  men  were  chosen  to  make  a 
purchase.  Endeavors  were  used,  &  moneys  laid  out.  But 
within  a  few  months  a  crosse  Act  was  procurd  by  some 
Viz:  tht  they  should  stand  to  their  former  purchase,  & 
not  proceede  in  any  further  purchase:  By  wch  Act  the 
former  Commrs  were  deserted  &  befoold  &  their  monies 
&  charges  Laid  out  never  accounted.  The  dore  was  still 
left  open  to  Continuall  Contention  &  hazard  of  Bloud- 
shed  (about  the  Medowes)  betweene  the  English  &  the 
Barbarians  And  a  New  dore  of  Temptacion  opened  for 
any  other  (English  or  foreigners)  to  make  a  purchase 
(of  wch  very  thing  there  was  not  a  vaine  report  then 
abroad  extant.)  Now  let  all  impartiall  &  sober  minded 
judge,  what  obligation  Lay  upon  the  6  men  appointed 
(as  the  paper  Simply  Speaks)  to  make  the  purchase; 
what  prndiousnes  appeares  in  any  of  them,  if  after  their 
being   shamefully   turnd   out   of   their    Trust   &    Ap- 


ROGER  WILLIAMS  LETTER  89 

pointmt  wch  they  had  sollemnly  with  subscription 
undertaken  &  (their  time  &  charges  never  accounted  for 
to  them)  faithfully  discharged:  And  after  the  Townes 
declaration  tht  they  would  make  no  purchase:  And  the 
Hand  was  in  hazard  &  like  to  be  bought  by  others:  I  say 
what  prfidiousnes  appeares  in  any  of  them,  if  (about  2 
years  after  all  the  former  Agitations  )  a  Select  &  resolved 
Company  of  Voluntiers  out  of  all  the  Hand,  Ports- 
mouth &  Newport*  breake  through  all  Difficulties  & 
resolve  (for  their  own  &  the  publike  good,  both  of  Hand 
&  Colony)  to  goe  thorough  with  the  Worckr  Yea  I 
querie  whether  if  these  purchasers  ( so  fowlely  repre- 
sented by  the  slanderour  as  prhdious  fellowes  &c)  had 
not  stept  forth  with  so  timely  a  Resolution  &  vigour  for 
their  owne  &  the  publike  good:  whether  they  could  have 
wiped  out  the  Blot  &  Imputation  of  being  false  &  perfi- 
dious to-  themselves  &  the  whole  Hand: 

But  alas,  how  easie  &  common  is  it  for  arrant  whores  to  cry 
whore  first?  For  (if  this  be  John  Eastons  pen  or  sub- 
scribing), how  is  it  tht  in  the  beginning  of  this  papr  he 
playes  the  Attorney  for  the  right  of  all  the  Inhabitants 
of  Rode  Hand,  &  yet  in  his  second  thoughts  &  Lines  of 
the  same  papr  he  once  &  againe  bloteth  out  all  Ports- 
mouth &  snatcheth  all  to  his  owne  Towne  of  Newport, 
for  wch  prfidious  dealing  (  from  his  owne  pen  apparent) 
I  presume  tht  no  honest  man  of  Newport  will  give  him 
thancks: 

Again  this  prfidious  paper  acknowledged  tht  we  live  by 
Lawes,  &  Saith  ( wch  is  a  mistake  )  tht  the  Narrigansets 
have  bound  themselves  to  our  Lawes,  in  Controversies 
between  us  &  them  And,  though  he  knowes  tht  the  very 
principles  &  Consciences  of  ye  Massachusets  &  the  other 
Colonies,  destroy  our  Liberties  &  teare  up  our  very 
Foundacion  &  Constitution.  And  though  he  knowes  tht 
his  Highnes  the  Lo:  Protector  his  Courts  are  open 
amongst  us,  &  tht  neither  himselfe  nor  any  tht  I  know 
of  hath  made  complaint,  or  commenced  any  Suit  agst 


90  RHODE    ISLAND    HISTORICAL    SOCIETY 

any  of  the  purchasers:  yet  hath  he  most  prhdiously 
joyned  with  these  bruitish  pagans  (who  have  dealt  so 
Jong  so  basely  with  Rode  Hand  about  their  Medowes) 
to  hinder  the  bringing  of  this  Hand  from  paganisme  to 
Civilitiej  yea  &  allso  to  bring  in  all  the  other  Colonies 
( c\  especially  the  Massachusetts  on  us,  from  whence  so 
many  are  expressly  or  (in  effect)  expelld  &  banished. 
He  knowes  what  numbers  in  every  Towne  of  the  Colony 
are  obnoxious  &  liable  to  the  prisons  &  whips  &  Halters 
of  the  Massachusets  (for  their  Religion  sake)  even  his 
owne  Father  as  much  as  any:  what  gracious  Spirit  then 
(either  of  Anger,  Envy  or  Revenge)  is  this  child  of, 
who  can  subscribe  &  joyne  with  the  very  Pagans  to  bring- 
in  an  Inundation  of  Calamitie  upon  us,  yea  &  to  hazard 
the  very  hanging  of  his  owne  Father: 

Another  charge  is  tht  they  made  this  purchase  of  Druncken 
Sachims  tht  they  sold  them  Liquors  wch  made  them 
drunck  &c. 

I  answer:  First  his  distinction  of  Druncken  &  Sober  honest 
Sachims,  is  both  Lamentable  &  ridiculous:  Lamentable 
tht  all  the  Pagans  are  So  given  to  Drunckennes.  It  is 
ridiculous  allso  tht  these  two  dissenting  Sachims  should 
be  estemmd  such  Sober  honest  men.  When  (besides  the 
Long  experience  of  their  owne  &  their  Fathers  honestie 
about  the  Meadowes )  it  is  notoriously  knowne  what 
conscience  all  Pagans  make  of  Lying,  Stealing,  Whor- 
ing, Murthering  &c.  And  as  for  Drunckennes  allso,  they 
will  not  Say  themselves  (especially  the  youngest  of  the 
two  )  but  tht  it  is  their  frequent  &  delightful!  practice. 

But  as  to  the  imputation  of  making  them  drunck  ( I  suppose 
he  hath  some  other  meaning  then  tht  childish  Fancie 
tht  the  Liquors  made  the  Indians  drunck  )  I  ans:  I  have 
examined  these  particulars  following  &  I  find  upon 
unquestionable  Testimonie  tht  the  Sachims  when  they 
went  to  the  Hand  to  treat  were  sober:  that  when  they 
treated  they  were  sober  (&  all  meanes  of  their  Distemp 
purposely  kept  from  them)  When  they  contracted  & 


ROGER  WILLIAMS  LETTER  91 

concluded  they  were  Sober:  When  they  receaved  pay- 
mts  they  were  Sober:  they  have  bene  allso  sober  when  in 
their  most  publike  Sollemne  meetings  they  have  sol- 
lemly  declared  to  all  Natives  their  Sale  of  the  Hand  & 
their  Resolution  to  maintaine  their  Act. 

And  if  the  Natives  had  Liquor  &  were  distempered  before 
or  after,  what  is  tht  to  the  invalidating  or  aspersing  of  a 
Businesr  If  so,  what  contracts,  what  purchases  among 
Merchants  or  others  in  this  Countery,  or  any  Countery 
shall  stand  &  be  effectuallr 

Lastly  the  purchasers  are  Said  to  countenance  the  druncken 
Sachims  to  cheating  the  honest  Sachims  &  the  Inhabi- 
tants &  to  kill  them  &c. 

I  answer  as  there  have  bene  many  of  these  Indian  princes  & 
their  Lords  bene  satisfied  (besides  those  two  first 
Sachims- who  sold  &  had  unquestionable  Right  to  Sell:) 
So  have  there  bene  many  large  proffers  tendred  to  these 
two  young  dissenting  Sachims  from  first  to  last.  But  as 
they  inherite  their  Fathers  Basenes  about  ye  Meadowes, 
So  doe  they  inherite  his  Barbarous  Spirit,  as  to  Bargaines 
with  the  English.  He  (&  the  elder  of  these  )  being  rich 
in  peag  have  made  demaunds  like  themselves.  He  for 
some  other  Lands,  &  these  for  this  Hand,  Viz.  That  we 
should  furnish  them  with  poyson  to  dispatch  Onkas: 
that  we  should  constantly  send  the  English  Souldiers 
with  theirs  agst  Onkas  ;  that  we  should  constantly  send 
up  contribucion  to  their  Niccommoes  or  Devilish  Feasts: 
On  these  &  other  such  abominable  Tearmes  they  have 
off  red  to  consent  &  tht  without  any  other  paymt : 

Lastly  it  is  well  knowne  tht  these  two  young  Sachims  would 
not  stirr  (for  the  other  Sachims  maintaine  their  Sale,  by 
their  owne  Constant  practice  &  Customes)  did  not  the 
Subscriber  or  some  other  mould  or  sharpen  them  to  a 
mischiefe. 

But  the  true  God  is  a  Righteous  Judge  &  his  Justice  shines 
in  two  or  three  particulars  about  this  Hand  First  the 


92  RHODE  ISLAND  HISTORICAL  SOCIETY 

obstructors  of  the  former  &  Later  purchasing  of  this 
Hand  are  like  to  have  little  share  in  it. 

2ndly  Such  as  have  peaceably  &  patiently  long  borne  the 
baseness  of  these  two  Sachims  &  their  Father  about  their 
Meadows  are  now  like  to  be  well  supplied. 

3rdly  these  honest  &  Sober  Sachims  who  have  thus  prop- 
agated their  Fathers  wickednes  toward  the  English  are 
like  to  be  cut  shore  of  their  Fair  proffers  wch  hietherto 
Pride  &  Folly  have  refused. 

By  this  time,  I  hope  I  have  (in  some  measure)  stopt  the 
mouth  &  shewd  the  weakenes  &  wickednes,  of  these  Out- 
ragious  clamors:  But  (  as  before  )  I  add  Since  the  Subscriber 
mencions  his  Highnes  the  Lo:  Prot:  tht  if  any  Law  he  broke 
or  wrong  done,  no  man  amongst  us,  but  in  his  Highnes 
Courts  of  Justice  in  the  Colony  is  responsable  &  liable  to  an 
Equall  Triall.  But  if  the  Subscriber  had  in  truth  owned  his 
Highnes  Authoritie  over  us,  or  had  respected  the  Colonies 
peace  &  Liberties:  this  naked  Indian  Bastard  had  never  thus 
bene  sent  to  bawle  over  the  Countrey  ( to  the  shame  of  its 
barbarous  Nakednes)  Nor  had  bene  thus  whipt  &  sent  home 
to  its  owne  Father  by 

Providence  25.6  A  Cordial  friend  to  this  Colony  & 

all  the  English 
1 659  (so  called )  Colonies  R.  W. 


Correction 

In  line  19  of  page  54  of  volume  27  of  the  Collections, 
please  read  Pearce  instead  of  Pierce. 


93 


Address  Delivered  at  the  Opening  of  the 

South  County  Museum  at  Wickford 

on  June  2,  1934 

By  William  Davis  Miller 

Your  Excellency,  Mr.  President,  Officers,  Members  and 
Friends  of  the  South  County  Museum,  truly  can  I  say  that  never 
before  have  I  been  able,  with  such  sincerity,  to  express  the  honor 
and  the  pleasure  which  1  feel  for  having  been  afforded  this 
opportunity.  For  by  the  conception  and  the  execution  of  the  idea 
"to  encourage  the  study  and  better  understanding  of  early  Ameri- 
can life  and  industry  in  the  home,  in  the  shop,  on  the  farm  and 
on  the  sea;  and  especially  to  discover,  identify,  classify,  preserve 
and  exhibit  the  tools,  implements,  utensils,  instruments,  vehicles, 
appliances  and  mechanical  devices  used  .  .  ."  the  founders  of 
this  South  County  Museum  have  filled  in  a  gap  in  the  historical 
record  of  this,  our  State,  that  was  sadly  needed  although  long 
appreciated  by  students  of  the  colonial  and  early  federal  days, 
appreciated  but  never  until  now  remedied.  Therefore,  we  who 
did  not  act  are  the  more  eager  to  applaud  those  who  have. 

It  would  appear  to  be  an  abiding  trait  of  man  that  the  majority 
will  ever  seek  to  preserve  that  which  is  considered  the  finest  and 
richest  evidences  of  the  years  that  have  past.  It  is  a  laudable  trait 
if  not  carried  to  extremes  but  is  very  liable  to  lead  to  a  habit  of 
relegating  the  humble  but  necessary  examples  of  the  labors  of  our 
forefathers  to  those  dark  and  dusty  corners  under  the  eaves 
where  they  remain  in  perennial  jeopardy  of  the  awful  domestic 
rite  .  . .  Spring  Cleaning.  By  the  same  token  when  a  craftsman  is 
considered,  we  are  wont  to  think  first  of  his  finished  work,  then 
if  he  has  achieved  success,  in  a  lesser  degree  of  the  man  himself 
but  practically  not  at  all  of  the  tools  he  used  and  the  method  and 
craft  employed. 

The  museums  and  the  historical  societies  in  general,  because  of 
this  and  also  because  of  the  habitual  penury  which  such  institu- 
tions suffer,  can  not  round  out  their  collections,  despite  the  real- 
izations and  desires  of  an  antiquarian  curator  who  understands 
the  unevenness  of  the  collection  under  his  charge  but  whose  hands 
are  bound  by  lack  of  space  and  funds  .  .  .  and  often  by  the  am- 
bitious and  competitive  impulses  of  his  board  of  trustees. 

Now  you  gentlemen  have  come  forward  and  remedied  this 


94  RHODE  ISLAND  HISTORICAL  SOCIETY 

serious  defect  of  balance,  not  only  in  this  glorious  old  Narragan- 
sett  Country  but  for  and  to  the  benefit  of  the  whole  State,  you 
have  set  up  a  collection  that  is,  and  will  ever  be,  an  invaluable 
supplement  to  the  fine  museums  of  which  Rhode  Island  is  so 
justly  proud.  And  you  have  chosen  well  the  situation  for  your 
work,  for  the  Narragansett  Country,  the  King's  Province,  the 
King's  County,  Washington  County,  the  South  County  ...  to 
give  it  all  its  names  throughout  the  ages  ...  is  the  most  suitable, 
the  most  typical,  the  most  comprehensive  of  all  the  counties  in 
the  State  for  the  location  of  a  museum  of  this  sort,  a  museum  of 
the  home,  the  shop,  the  farm  and  the  sea.  A  county  of  great 
farms  from  the  latter  half  of  the  seventeenth  century  .  .  .  this 
barn  stands  on  land  included  in  the  great  Smith  .  .  .  later  Up- 
dike .  .  .  estate,  estimated  at  one  time  to  contain  over  three  thou- 
sand acres  .  .  .  great  farms  of  rich  lands  and  of  richer  avails  in 
horses,  cattle,  sheep,  dairy  products  and  grains.  So  great  was  the 
potential  value  of  this  district  in  the  eyes  of  the  early  colonists 
that  for  a  long  time  it  was  a  veritable  Tom  Tidler's  Ground,  the 
cause  and  scene  of  a  long  and  bitter  struggle  to  wrest  this  Narra- 
gansett Country  from  the  jurisdiction  of  the  stubborn  little 
Colony  of  Rhode  Island  whose  jealous  protection,  however,  at 
last  overcame  the  covetous  designs  and  hostile  acts  of  her  neigh- 
bors and  resident  advocates. 

On  these  broad  acres  lived  the  families  of  the  Narragansett 
Planters,  who  created  for  themselves  a  frankly  autocratic  com- 
munity, but  being  influenced,  doubtlessly,  by  the  climate  and  the 
beauties  of  this  countryside,  and  certainly  unhampered  by  re- 
strictions enforced  by  a  theocratic  power,  this  autocracy  was 
mellowed  by  a  geniality  and  warmth  unknown  in  the  cold  and 
more  rarified  atmosphere  of  the  nearby  colonies. 

In  those  early  days,  and  until  adverse  economic  restrictions, 
which  led  to  the  Revolution,  broke  up  the  majority  of  their 
rstates,  the  whole  of  the  South  County  benefited  by  the  presence 
of  these  landholders.  Their  prosperity  was  reflected  throughout 
the  country-side  and  as  they  prospered  so  did  the  shop-keeper, 
the  craftsmen,  the  miller  and  the  shipwright.  The  best  evidence 
of  this  is  found  in  the  fact  that  this  community  was  able  to 
support  such  silversmiths  of  merit  as  Samuel  Casey,  John  Waite 
and  Nathaniel  Helme.  whose  craft  was  entirelv  dependent  upon 
proximity  to  wealth  and  was  therefore  one  rarely  found  at  such  a 
distance  from  rich  towns  and  cities.  Again  the  Planters  must 
needs  find  outlets  for  their  produce,  and  as  in  those  days  com- 
merce was  almost  entirely  seaborn,  it  was  natural,  despite  the 
considerable  use  made  by  the  Planters  of  the  port  of  Newport, 
that  not  only  docks  but  also  shipyards  were  numerous  along  the 
bavside.    Therefore  because  of  this  wealth  benefiting  the  farms, 


SOUTH   COUNTY   MUSEUM  95 

the  villages,  in  fact  the  whole  county,  we  can  well  consider  that 
the  old  South  County  had  within  its  confines  all  the  different 
aspects  of  life  and  trade  of  the  Colonial  days  and  upon  an  un- 
usually generous  scale.  This  latter  remark  may  be  further  em- 
phasized by  considering  the  amounts  levied  by  the  Colonial  Gov- 
ernment upon  the  several  townships.  For  a  number  of  years  the 
greatest  amount  is  found  against  Newport,  with  South  Kings- 
town second  and  Providence  third. 

And  if  all  this  leaves  some  Doubting  Thomas  to  be  convinced, 
let  him  examine  the  inventories,  those  documentary  proofs  of  the 
life,  work  and  wealth  of  the  families  of  the  South  County.  All 
their  belongings ;  their  home,  household  goods,  tools  and  imple- 
ments, cattle  and  poultry,  rarely  their  dogs  (and  never  their  cats) , 
are  all  carefully  recorded  and  from  these  lists  we  see  what  man- 
ner of  men  they  were  and  what  their  occupation.  These  inven- 
tories not  only  serve  as  a  veritable  guide  to  the  formation  of  a 
collection  such  as  this,  but  also  provide  a  means  of  identification 
of  unfamiliar  items. 

Of  a  certainty  much  so  listed  has  suffered  through  the  passage 
of  years  and  the  various  forms  of  destruction  caused  by  careless- 
ness, neglect  and  abuse,  but  we  can  still  hope  to  find  a  cheese  vat 
similar  to  those  in  the  cheese  house  of  Robert  Hazard  which  were 
reputed  to  have  a  capacity  of  one  bushel,  and  that  was  Hazard's 
second  size  at  that !  Of  course  if  we  should  come  across  the  "old 
tobacco  knife  and  pair  of  tobacco  tongues"  which  belonged  to 
George  Babcock  they  should  at  once  be  taken  to  the  Gilbert  Stuart 
snuff  mill,  but  we  would  not  part  with  such  a  flax  seed  press  as 
the  one  used  by  Samuel  Wilson,  in  moments  of  abandon,  to  stamp 
out  counterfeit  Spanish  Milled  Dollars  upon  blanks  of  base  metal 
made,  and  willingly  supplied,  by  that  master  craftsman,  albeit 
rogue,  Samuel  Casey.  This  museum  ought  to  have  at  least  one  of 
Rowland  Robinson's  twelve  trenchers  and  for  exhibition  pur- 
poses, save  on  high  days  and  holidays,  all  five  of  George  Hazard's 
punch  bowls.  I  wonder  if  his  canoe  was  a  dugout,  I  believe  that 
it  was,  and  I  would  be  interested  in  some  tools  of  the  shipwrights 
who  built  the  "Sloop  South  Kingstown  .  .  .  Burthen  about  100 
Tons  .  .  .  having  been  out  on  a  trading  Voyage  in  her  return 
home  from  ...  a  French  settlement  in  Hispaniola  .  .  .  was  at- 
tacked, seized  and  taken  on  18th  of  March  1741  ..."  \Ye  know 
she  was  built  in  South  Kingstown  and  possibly  in  Hazard's  yards 
at  Watson's  Pier  on  Boston  Neck. 

Now  there  is  another  important  feature  and  duty  of  the  South 
County  Museum  .  .  .  the  preservation  of  antiquities.  You  have 
certainly  succeeded  in  arousing  the  interest  of  not  only  the  South 
County  but  of  the  whole  State,  and  the  maintenance  of  this 
enthusiasm  by  you  will  be  the  means  of  the  preservation  of  an 


96  RHODE  ISLAND  HISTORICAL  SOCIETY 

untold  number  of  valuable  and  interesting  examples  of  tools. 
implements  and  house-hold  gear.  Ignorance,  which  is  often- 
times simply  interest  not  aroused,  has  been  responsible  for  the 
loss  of  more  evidences  of  the  past  than  fire  and  water.  The  attic, 
woodshed  and  the  barn  loft  have  probably  received  more  antiques 
than  the  museums,  received  them  to  he  the  food  for  animals  and 
vermin  and  then  to  suffer  total  destruction  in  the  rubbish  heap. 
This  is  still  going  on,  and  can  only  he  stopped  by  interesting- 
people  in  the  possible  historical  value  of  even  the  most  seeming 
trifle;  and  by  further  providing  a  place  for  its  reception,  which 
you  have  done. 

Therefore,  maintain  the  interest  and  the  knowledge  which  you 
have  aroused,  so  that  when  that  terrible  aftermath  of  the  sulphur 
and  molasses  season  is  next  upon  the  land,  when  the  broom  is 
dampened  and  everything  is  moved  out,  and  put  hack  again,  all 
scrubbed,  polished  and  tidied  up ;  when  forgotten  things  make 
their  unexpected  appearance,  to  be  either  tucked  away  once  more 
or  ruthlessly  thrown  out ;  the  householder  will  pause  in  the  midst 
of  his  or  her  labor  and  think  "Now  is  this  queer  looking  old  con- 
traption any  good  to  the  South  County  Museum"  and  will  there 
upon  bring  it  here  to  find  out.  And  my  advice  to  you  is  to  take 
it  and  encourage  the  giver ;  and  you  will  find  much  fine  metal  in 
the  occasional  dross. 

So  once  more  I  wish  to  offer  congratulations  to  the  founders, 
especially  to  Mr.  Lownes  whose  modesty  can  not  be  allowed  to 
belittle  the  great  tribute  due  to  him.  Tn  the  establishment  of  this 
museum  you  have  created  for  yourselves,  and  for  those  who  will 
surely  follow  you,  a  responsibility  which  you  must  not  shirk. 
You  owe  to  the  future  fulfilment  of  the  promise  you  have  made. 
You  will  have  loyal  support ;  and  in  the  hard  work  ahead,  as  in 
the  hard  work  which  you  have  completed,  there  will  be  a  just 
sense  of  satisfaction  .  .  .  and  there  will  be  fun. 


Form  of  Legacy 

"/  give  and  bequeath  to  the  Rhode  Island 
Historical  Society  the  sum  of 
dollars." 


Koci-k  Williams  Press 


I  .   A.    Johnson  Co. 


PROVIDENCE 


Rhode    Island 

Historical  Society 

Collections 


Vol.  XXVII 


OCTOBER,   1934 


NEWPORT    LIGHT    INFANTRY    CAP 

(See  page  97) 


Issued  Quarterly 


No.  4 


68  Waterman  Street,  Providence,  Rhode  Island 


CONTENTS 


PAGE 

Newport  Light  Infantry  Insignia 

by  W.  L.  Calver         .          .          .          Cover  and  97 

Providence  in  Civil  War  Days 

by  Theodore  Collier    .... 

98 

Clock  made  by  Caleb  Wheaton    . 

103 

Flag  of  the  Horse  Guards    .... 

114 

Seal  of  Cumberland    ..... 

117 

Privateers  of  1798      . 

118 

Ponaganset  dugout     ..... 

119 

New  Publications  of  Rhode  Island  Interest  . 

123 

Notes 

123 

Colonial  Heraldry  ;  Ballou 

illustrated  by  Harold  Bowditch    . 

124 

Indian  Implements    ..... 

125 

Westconnaug  Purchase       .... 

127 

RHODE 
HISTORICAL 


ISLAND 

SOCIETY 


COLLECTIONS 


Vol.  XXVII 


OCTOBER,  1934 


No.  4 


H.  Anthony  Dyer,  President         Gilbert  A.  Harrington,  Treasurer 
Howard  W.  Preston,  Secretary  Howard  M.  Chapin,  Librarian 


The  Society  assumes  no  responsibility  for  the  statements  or  the  opinions 
of  contributors. 


Newport  Light  Infantry  Company  Insignia 

By  W.  L.  Calver 

I  noticed  recently  in  some  publications*  a  rather  indis- 
tinct illustration  of  the  cap  of  the  Newport  Light  Infantry 
Company,  which  is  now  in  the  Royal  United  Service  Insti- 
tute at  Whitehall,  London.  I  sketched  the  cap  some  years 
ago  while  I  was  in  London.  I  am  wondering  if  the  full 
import  of  the  device  upon  the  front  of  the  cap  has  been 
noted.  America  holds  in  her  left  hand  an  olive  branch  and 
liberty  cap,  while  in  reserve  partly  concealed  in  her  right 
hand  is  a  sword.  I  translate  the  motto  as  "Country  is  dear, 
but  Liberty  is  dearer ;"  the  very  sentiment  that  Webster 
decried:  "Liberty  first  and  union  afterward." 

Doubtless  upon  its  ribbon  above  the  anchor  was  "Hope." 
Several  members  of  the  Newport  Light  Infantry  became 
officers  in  the  Continental  Line.  The  cap  was  probably  car- 
ried away  from  Newport  by  the  British  in  1  780. 

*  Emblems  of  Rhode  Island.  Illustrations  of  the  Seal,  Arms  and  Flags 
of  Rhode  Island,  page  29. 


98  RHODK  ISLAND  HISTORICAL  SOCIETY 

Providence  in  Civil  War  Days 

By  Theodore  Collier 

{Continue//  from  Page  S4) 

The  clouds  had  begun  to  lift.  It  was  not  strange  that 
Washington's  Birthday  that  year,  1  862,  was  observed  with 
more  than  customary  fervor.  The  hundred  guns  that 
saluted  the  day  spoke  in  tones  of  confidence  and  determina- 
tion, tones  which  were  echoed  in  the  pulpit  of  the  Old  First 
Baptist  Meeting  House  by  Dr.  Wayland  and  Bishop  Clark. 
There  was  no  vainglorying  nor  boasting,  no  painting  of 
rainbows.  True  prophets  as  they  were,  they  gave  warning 
of  trials  yet  to  be  endured ;  but  through  all  their  words  there 
breathed  a  sublime  faith  that  would  not  be  denied.  And 
those  who  listened  found  their  own  hope  rekindled  and 
their  own  courage  renewed.  All  over  the  land  that  day 
other  Waylands  and  other  Clarks  were  preaching  the  same 
message.  And  the  North  took  heart  again.  Something  within 
gave  it  assurance  of  final  victory;  through  whatever  dark 
valleys  and  across  whatever  bloody  fields  its  path  might 
lead  it  would  end  in  victory  and  peace.  It  was  the  turning 
of  the  spiritual  tide. 

Yes,  the  North  had  a  vision  of  victory.  Already  it  was 
singing  a  new  song,  the  song  of  her  who  had  seen  the 
"Glory  of  the  Coming  of  the  Lord,"  the  "Glory  Hallelujah 
Song,"  they  called  it  then,  first  sung  in  our  streets  by  the 
boys  of  the  1  Oth  Battery  as  they  marched  out. 

The  winter  of  discontent  was  wearing  to  a  close;  Spring 
was  at  hand,  and  with  Spring  new  successes:  Beaufort, 
Newbern  and  Ft.  Macon  ( these  to  Burnside's  credit ) ; 
Island  No.  10;  and,  greatest  of  all,  the  brilliant  exploit  of 
the  Monitor,  a  battle  which  opened  a  new  era  in  naval  war- 
fare. "How  John  Bull  will  gaze  upon  his  wooden  navy 
and  ask  in  despair  what  it  is  worth!"  cried  the  Journal,  in 
exultation.  John  Bull's  navy,  no  longer  wooden,  serves  a 


PROVIDENCE  IN  CIVIL  WAR  DAYS  99 

different  purpose  just  now,  and  no  one  of  us  is  disposed  to 
question  its  worth.  But  we  have  no  need  to  excuse  our 
fathers  for  their  taunting j  they  had  endured  much  at  the 
hands  of  England,  England  from  whom,  among  all  the 
nations  of  Europe,  they  most  expected  discerning  sympathy. 

Apropos  of  the  Monitor,  its  inventor  John  Ericsson  was 
promptly  claimed  by  Rhode  Island  as  a  descendant  of 
Lief  Ericsson,  "the  first  Rhode  Islander,"  A.  D.  1000  or 
thereabouts.  As  for  the  Monitor  itself,  it  paid  the  penalty 
of  fame — it  had  a  hat  named  after  it,  and,  I  presume,  like- 
wise a  cigar  j  but  I  will  vouch  for  the  hat. 

Burnside's  achievements  in  North  Carolina  received  the 
grateful  recognition  of  the  State  that  was  ever  proud  to  do 
him  honor.  Upon  his  return  in  the  fall  he  was  voted  the 
thanks  of  the  General  Assembly  and  presented  with  a 
beautiful  sword  of  ceremony. 

But  things  were  going  badly  on  the  James.  Banks  had 
suffered  a  reverse ;  McClellan  failed  before  Yorktown  and 
was  compelled  to  retire.  The  cry  was  raised,  "The  Capital 
is  in  danger."  The  call  went  forth  for  new  levies.  Rhode 
Island  answered  with  her  oldtime  promptness.  In  the  words 
of  the  Journal,  "The  men  sprung  to  their  swords,  the 
women  to  their  needles."  Men  hurried  again  from  their 
counting  rooms  and  workshops  j  students  dropped  their 
books  and  fell  into  the  ranks  j  mothers  who  had  already 
sent  sons  to  war  heroically  bade  their  other  sons  God-speed  j 
brides  parted  tearfully  but  bravely  with  their  husbands  j 
the  sorriest  and  saddest  men  were  those  who  could  not  go. 
Fifty  students  of  the  University  volunteered  ;  and  seven- 
teen of  the  High  School  boys.  Within  two  days  a  regiment, 
the  9th,  under  Col.  Robbins,  had  been  sent  off;  in  less  than 
a  week,  another,  under  Col.  Bliss,  had  followed. 

But  even  these  proved  not  enough.  In  July  came  a 
second  and  more  urgent  call  for  300,000  men.  The  situa- 
tion seemed  desperate.  McClellan  was  retreating,  and  rein- 
forcements were  needed  at  once,  or  the  whole  campaign  in 
Virginia  might  collapse.  For  the  first  time  Rhode  Island 


100  RHODE  ISLAND  HISTORICAL  SOCIETY 

lagged.  It  was  past  believing.  Even  bounties  failed  to  move 
her;  she  seemed  indifferent  alike  to  danger  and  to  duty. 
Day  after  day,  with  ever-rising  inflection,  the  Journal 
pleaded  for  the  safety  of  the  Republic  and  the  honor  of  the 
State:  "Rouse  yourselves,  men  of  the  North!  Choose  you, 
where  you  will  fight,  along  the  Potomac,  or  on  the  banks 
of  the  Delaware  or,  mayhap,  of  the  Connecticut!  " 

But  recruits  only  trickled  in.  Something  must  be  done, 
and  without  delay.  A  great  mass  meeting  was  called  in 
Market  Square.  For  an  hour  before  the  time  of  assembling 
the  bells  were  rung  and  the  band  paraded  the  streets.  The 
meeting  was  presided  over  by  the  Mayor,  Jabez  C.  Knight; 
on  the  platform  sat  all  the  Conscript  Fathers.  The  Governor 
spoke;  likewise  the  Lieutenant  Governor,  the  Bishop  and 
many  others,  their  peers  in  eloquence.  For  three  hours  it 
went  on,  the  enthusiasm  mounting  with  the  temperature, — 
it  was  August.  It  was  a  "grand  success" — as  a  meeting;  but 
the  immediate  results  were  meagre,  and  it  was  not  until 
September  that  a  regiment  was  raised,  and  not  until  well 
into  October  that  it  left  for  the  front. 

And  it  is  doubtful  whether  even  this  could  have  been 
accomplished  without  the  spur  of  fear — Lee  had  crossed 
the  Potomac — and  without  the  lure  of  high  bounties.  Lee's 
invasion  of  Maryland  left  no  room  for  argument;  the 
Government  must  have  more  men,  and  must  have  them  at 
once!  Recruiting  was  made  the  order  of  the  day.  Ward 
committees  were  organized;  daily  meetings  were  held; 
every  afternoon  for  a  week  business  was  suspended;  a 
recruiting  tent  was  pitched  on  the  Bridge,  another  at  Hoyle 
Square.  The  advertising  columns  of  the  papers  bristled  with 
appeals  for  volunteers.  Subscription  lists  for  bounties  were 
opened;  Henry  Lippitt  offered  $1,000  to  the  ward  that 
first  raised  its  quota;  A.  C.  Barstow  offered  a  second 
$1,000;  Mayor  Knight,  a  third;  from  a  score  of  wealthy 
citizens  came  equally  large  contributions;  in  ten  days 
$70,000  was  raised;  and  the  city  appropriated  $  1 00,000  for 
the  relief  of  soldiers'  families.  Seeing  that  we  have  de- 


PROVIDENCE   IN   CIVIL   WAR  DAYS  101 

scribed  it,  we  claim  the  privilege  of  naming  it:  it  was 
Providence's  first  "drive" ;  certainly  it  had  all  the  symp- 
toms of  a  "drive."  It  was  a  success ;  but  it  was  the  last  suc- 
cess under  the  bounty  system.  What  played  the  mischief 
with  volunteering?  Bounties!  At  first  prescribed  in  mod- 
erate doses,  as  a  tonic,  they  had  come  to  be  relied  on  as  a 
stimulant,  with  the  inevitable  consequence,  the  oftener 
taken,  the  more  requirecj. 

And  thus  the  good  people  of  Providence  came  to  the 
edge  of  the  second  winter  of  the  War.  And  here  let  us  leave 
off  following  the  red  trail  for  a  bit,  and  make  the  round  of 
their  city,  drop  into  their  homes,  and  "have  a  dish  of 
gossip." 

The  Providence  of  the  '60s  was  far  smaller  and  less 
extended  than  the  Providence  of  today.  On  the  East  Side 
the  built-up  portion  resembled  an  "L,"  of  which  Prospect, 
Benefit  and  Main  Streets  constituted  the  upright,  and 
Wickenden,  the  foot.  Along  Angell  and  Waterman  Streets 
the  houses  ran  fairly  close  together,  almost  if  not  quite  to 
the  Seekonk.  From  Prospect  they  crept  down  over  the  Hill 
toward  Brown  Street;  but  the  section  east  of  Prospect  and 
north  of  Angell  was  for  the  most  part  sparsely  settled; 
while  beyond  the  Asylum  and  the  Friends  School,  it  was 
open  country,  with  here  and  there  a  farmhouse. 

On  the  west  side  of  the  river  the  city  spread  out  from 
Market  Square  fan-wise;  west  and  southwest  along  Wash- 
ington, Westminster,  Weybosset  and  Broad  Streets;  and 
south  along  Dyer  and  Pine.  Elmwood  was  considered  pretty 
well  out;  Olneyville,  or  Johnston,  lay  beyond  the  city 
limits;  Cranston  was  a  neighboring  village. 

Where  now  we  have  the  freight  yards  there  was  then 
a  Cove.  The  "business  section"  of  the  city  comprised  North 
and  South  Main  Streets,  Westminster  Street,  Market 
Square  and  Exchange  Place.  Says  a  contemporary  descrip- 
tion: "Westminster  Street  is  becoming  more  and  more  an 
attractive  place  of  trade  because  of  the  showy  and  beautiful 
stores  that  are  springing  up  along  its  excellent  sidewalks. 


102  RHODE  ISLAND  HISTORICAL  SOCIETY 

One  by  one  the  old  fashioned  shop  fronts  disappear,  and  the 
new  stores  take  on  a  metropolitan  air  just  as  naturally  as 
though  it  was  a  universal  law  of  trade  that  success  is  de- 
pendent upon  using  great  panes." 

To  get  about  the  city  one  walked  or  took  a  hack.  The  war 
was  half  over  before  the  rails  of  the  first  street-car  line 
were  laid,  from  Exchange  Place  to  Broad  Street,  via  Dor- 
rance,  Westminster  and  High.  Other  lines  were  soon  run 
to  Elmwood,  Olneyville  and  Pawtucket,  and  along  Wick- 
enden  and  Washington  Streets.  The  advent  of  the  horse- 
cars  was  an  occasion  for  civic  pride;  "elegant  vehicles!" 
was  the  approving  verdict;  "it  is  a  luxury  to  ride  in  them." 

It  was  a  town  of  wealth  even  then,  the  taxable  prop- 
erty of  its  60,000  inhabitants  being  assessed  at  nearly 
$60,000,000.  Although  on  the  tax  lists  there  was  but  one 
man  rated  as  a  millionaire,  Alexander  Duncan,  there  were 
not  a  few  men  of  what  then  passed  for  large  fortunes.  The 
war  stimulated  business,  and  Providence  grew  richer  year 
by  year.  Many  were  the  evidences  of  prosperity:  a  new 
City  Hall  was  built  in  1865;  the  Rhode  Island  Hospital 
was  chartered  in  1863.  The  real  estate  market  was  un- 
usually active,  and  land  values  steadily  rose.  In  1  864  sales 
amounted  to  nearly  $3,000,000.  Liberal  contributions  were 
made  to  relief  work  and  local  charities;  many  church  mort- 
gages were  paid  off,  the  culminating  proof  of  a  surplus. 

Cotton  was  then,  as  now,  our  great  staple  of  manufac- 
ture. The  immediate  effect  of  Secession  was  naturally  to 
restrict  trade  in  the  raw  material.  Receipts,  which  in  1860 
had  amounted  to  160,000  bales,  were  reduced  in  1861  and 
1862  to  about  57,000  bales.  The  capture  of  New  Orleans 
and  of  Vicksburg  and  the  opening  of  the  Mississippi  re- 
lieved the  stringency  somewhat;  but  even  in  1864  only 
107,000  bales  were  obtained.  Prices  shot  up  at  the  begin- 
ning of  the  war  and  continued  to  rise  every  year.  During 
1861  the  cost  of  raw  cotton  advanced  from  38c  to  68c ;  dur- 
ing the  next  year  from  68c  to  82c;  in  1 864  there  were  times 
when  it  brought  as  high  as  $1.88.  Print  cloth  jumped  from 


Clock  made  by  Caleb  Wheaton  of  Providence 
Bequeathed  to  the  Society  of  C.  Prescott  Knight 


104  RHODE  ISLAND  HISTORICAL  SOCIETY 

-l-^c  in  1860,  to  an  average  of  27c  at  the  beginning  of 
1  865 j  once  it  reached  the  dizzy  height  of  3Sl/2c.  Only 
with  the  return  of  peace  did  the  cotton  market  recover  its 
equilibrium. 

But  business  found  adequate  compensation  in  the  de- 
mand for  war  supplies.  Shops  and  factories  which,  owing 
to  the  "panic"  of  1857,  had  been  all  but  idle  in  I860,  at 
once  became  busy;  there  was  employment  for  everyone. 
By  1863,  partly  as  a  consequence  of  the  drain  of  men  into 
the  army,  there  was  a  scarcity  of  labor  in  some  fields.  There 
were  thousands  of  hands  employed  in  munitions  works. 
The  Burnside  Rifle  Company  was  turning  out  100  rifles  a 
day;  the  Providence  Tool  Company  1 25  Springfields  a  day, 
besides  bayonets  and  ramrods;  the  Providence  Gunlock 
Company,  a  thousand  locks  a  week.  The  Schubarth  Com- 
pany was  assembling  Springfield  rifles  and  sending  them 
off  at  the  rate  of  nearly  two  thousand  a  month;  other  con- 
cerns were  manufacturing  various  parts.  The  Corliss  Com- 
pand  and  the  Providence  Steam  Engine  Company  were 
building  marine  engines  and  boilers  for  the  navy;  the 
Builders  Iron  was  casting  heavy  ordnance,  1  1  inch  and 
13  inch  Dahlgren  guns,  a  gun  every  four  days,  besides  five 
tons  of  shot  and  shell  a  day.  Here  also  were  cast  the 
powerful  guns  for  Ericsson's  second  monitor,  the  "Dic- 
tator." But  the  greatest  feat  of  casting  was  performed  at 
the  Corliss  works — two  100  inch  cylinders  for  a  gunboat; 
34  tons  of  molten  iron,  the  largest  quantity  that  had  ever 
been  poured  in  New  England  from  a  single  reservoir,  was 
run  into  the  mould  in  seventy-five  seconds.  Providence 
was  ingenious  as  well  as  industrious,  and  produced  not  a 
few  inventions  in  the  way  of  guns  or  shells. 

While  certain  staples,  like  cotton  and  iron,  were  high, 
and  most  manufactured  articles  comparatively  costly,  pro- 
visions were,  if  not  cheap,  at  least  reasonable  throughout 
the  greater  part  of  the  war.  Not  until  the  beginning  of  '64 
was  there  any  material  advance  in  prices.  With  all  her 
burdens  and  anxieties  the  housewife  of  the  early  '60s  had 


PROVIDENCE  IN   CIVIL  WAR  DAYS  105 

much  to  be  thankful  for ;  she  was  not  dogged  at  every  step 
by  the  "High  Cost  of  Living";  her  calendar  contained  no 
wheatless,  meatless,  porkless  days.  She  did  not  have  to 
jeopardize  her  salvation  by  practicing  deception  on  her  men 
folks,  palming  off  scorpions  for  eggs;  if  her  son  asked  for 
bread  she  gave  him  pure  wheat.  She  could  afford  to.  Her 
Sunday  roast  cost  but  12-1 7c  a  pound;  steak,  sirloin  or  por- 
terhouse, the  same;  turkey  was  considered  high  at  15c;  a 
pair  of  woodcock  or  a  pavir  of  partridges  could  be  bought 
for  50c;  lobster  sold  for  10c  a  pound;  eggs,  at  1  5c  a  dozen; 
butter,  at  20-30c  a  pound;  lard,  at  10c  a  pound;  potatoes, 
at  60-8 0c  a  bushel;  flour,  at  around  $7  a  barrel.  Sugar  was 
fairly  high,  9- 12c;  coffee  was  cheap,  24c,  but  of  poor 
quality.  These  were  average  prices  for  1861  and  1862. 
From  the  spring  of  J63  onward  there  was  a  steady  but  mod- 
erate increase,  until  the  winter  of  '64-'65  when  everything 
advanced  sharply:  beef  to  30c;  butter  to  60c;  eggs  to  45c ; 
potatoes  to  $1.40;  white  sugar  to  30c  a  pound;  flour  to 
$13.00  a  barrel;  kerosene  to  $1.00  a  gallon. 

But  although  the  housewife  was  not  called  upon  to  enlist 
under  the  standard  of  food  conservation,  it  must  not  be 
supposed  that  she  was  denied  the  opportunity  of  serving  by 
saving.  Cheerfully  she  submitted  to  the  necessity  of  econ- 
omy; nay,  she  claimed  it  as  a  privilege.  Clothes,  in  par- 
ticular, were  costly;  and  the  problem  of  dress  was  no  easy 
one;  but  woman's  wits  were  equal  to  it.  She  "made  over" 
and  retrimmed.  To  save  material,  she  shortened  the 
flounces;  she  used  mousseline  de  laine  in  place  of  silk;  or 
she  brightened  up  her  rusty  silk  with  alcohol  and  "made  it 
do."  Here  and  there  we  meet  a  woman  who  had  gone  daft, 
and  fondly  believed  that  the  war  can  be  won  by  shears.  I 
recall  one  who  rushed  into  print  with  the  announcement  of 
a  grand  discovery — $1,000,000  a  year  could  be  saved  by 
the  women  of  the  North,  by  simply  making  their  dresses  to 
escape  the  ground  by  one  inch,  instead  of  letting  them  trail 
on  the  ground  two  inches.  If  that  woman  had  only  had  our 
present  fashion  plates,  she  would  have  saved  the  whole 
cost  of  the  war  and  extinguished  the  national  debt  besides. 


106  RHODE  ISLAND  HISTORICAL  SOCIETY 

Paris  fashions  decreed  the  disappearance  of  bonnets. 
Birds,  boughs  of  trees,  kitchen  gardens,  all,  all  gone!  — 
"In  April,"  says  a  contemporary,  "every  lady  wore  upon 
her  head  the  foliage,  the  fruits,  the  flying  things  of  an  island 
in  the  Pacific.  In  June,  the  astonished  opera  glass  explores 
the  brilliant  crowd  almost  in  vain  to  find  one  vestige  of  a 
bonnet.  The  bonnet  has  retreated  to  the  extreme  rear;  it 
barely  flanks  the  extreme  right  and  left  wings  of  the  world 
and  voluminous  coiffures  into  which  fashionable  beauty 
twists,  puffs,  expands  and  frizzles  its  own  hair,  and  all  the 
other  hair  upon  which  it  can  lay  its  hands." 

But,  even  in  war-times,  it  was  not  all  work  and  worry, 
buying  and  selling,  fighting  and  praying.  Men  were  not 
always  orating  or  enlisting,  or  hammering  out  great  guns; 
and  women  who  sat  down  with  unvarying  regularity  to  sew, 
occasionally  rose  up  to  play.  How  did  they  amuse  them- 
selves? There  was  the  theatre,  and  it  had  much  to  offer  as 
regards  both  merit  and  variety.  They  might  go  to  see  Char- 
lotte Cushman  in  various  Shakespearean  roles,  or  Laura 
Keene  in  "Our  American  Cousin"  and  "She  Stoops  to  Con- 
quer"; or  Wallack  and  the  two  Davenports  in  "Othello" 
and  "Richard  III";  or  Wilkes  Booth  in  "Hamlet";  or  the 
"charming  Maggie  Mitchell,"  as  "Katie  O'Sheal."  They 
could  feast  their  eyes  on  "Little  Dolly  Dutton,  the  tiniest, 
most  beautiful,  most  fairy-like  and  lovely  specimen  of 
female  humanity  in  the  world";  or  they  could  run  with  the 
hounds  in  "Lmcle  Tom's  Cabin,"  or  replenish  their  stock 
of  jokes  at  "Christie's  Minstrels."  Or,  if  they  delighted  in 
the  spectacular,  they  went  to  see  the  "Polyorama  of  the 
War,"  a  sort  of  Mid-Victorian  "movie,"  except  that  it  was 
the  spectator,  not  the  picture,  that  did  the  moving.  At  other 
times,  Tom  Thumb,  Commodore  Nutt,  Herrmann,  or 
Artemus  Ward  held  the  stage.  "Perfesser"  Somebody-or- 
other  came  with  his  "Laughing  gas,"  producing  "sensations 
delightful  beyond  all  the  power  of  words  to  express."  One 
young  lady  under  the  influence  of  the  gas  recited  "an  orig- 


PROVIDENCE  IN  CIVIL  WAR  DAYS  107 

inal  poem  on  Rhode  Island."  The  place  of  the  circus  was 
taken  by  the  "Hippozoonomodon"  and  the  "Athleclym- 
pimantheum." 

Lovers  of  music  patronized  the  Italian  Opera,  which 
came  every  year;  or  now  and  then  they  chartered  a  special 
train  and  went  up  to  Boston  for  an  evening.  In  '63  a  German 
Company  came  and  sang,  three  successive  evenings,  "Mar- 
tha," "Faust,"  and  "Der  Freischutz."  It  was  Providence's 
first  "operatic  season"  of  its  own,  and  it  was  justly  proud  of 
the  distinction. 

For  the  improvement  of  the  mind  there  were  lectures, 
the  Lyceum  series,  the  Mechanics  Institute  series,  and  many 
others  besides.  Henry  Ward  Beecher,  George  William 
Curtis,  Wendell  Phillips,  Edward  Everett,  Charles  Sum- 
ner, Higginson,  William  Lloyd  Garrison,  —  there  were 
giants  in  those  days — came  repeatedly  to  speak  on  the  causes 
and  issues  of  the  War.  John  Lord's  historical  lectures  and 
Bayard  Taylor's  travel-talks  were  popular.  "Timothy  Tit- 
comb,"  on  literary  subjects,  was  always  heard  with  delight. 
The  "red-hottest"  speaker  who  came  to  Providence  during 
the  War  was,  I  believe,  Parson  Brownlow,  who  delivered  a 
slashing  lecture  on  "Rotten  Monarchies  and  Live  Re- 
publics." 

The  University  reflected  in  every  phase  of  her  life  the 
influence  of  the  War.  From  first  to  last  there  was  never  a 
call  for  volunteers  that  did  not  bring  Brown  boys  hurrying 
to  the  colors.  By  September,  1862  half  the  college  had 
enlisted,  and,  said  President  Sears,  "all  the  rest  of  us,  Pro- 
fessors and  students  alike,  are  ready  to  go  whenever 
needed."  But  what  sort  of  soldiers  were  they?  Were  they 
better  or  worse  for  "college"?  How  did  their  "higher  edu- 
cation" stand  the  acid  test  of  war?  Let  a  contemporary  tes- 
tify: "What  patience  and  fortitude,  what  bravery  and  cool- 
ness, what  power  of  adaptation  to  new  circumstances,  what 
readiness  to  obey,  what  skill  in  command,  have  these  young 
men,  fresh  from  their  studies,  evinced.  How  has  their  char- 
acter shone  forth,  the  ripe  fruit,  the  most  splendid  vindi- 


108  RHODE  ISLAND  HISTORICAL  SOCIETY 

cation  of  severe  academic  training  and  discipline:  During 
this  war,  when  perhaps  it  was  least  expected  by  many,  our 
higher  schools  of  learning  have  shown  themselves,  as  never 
before,  entitled  to  the  gratitude  and  affectionate  support  of 
the  Nation." 

Commencement  had  alwavs  been  a  considerable  event  in 
the  life  of  the  community  as  well  as  of  the  University.  But 
the  commencements  of  '6 1  -'65  were  invested  with  an  extra- 
ordinary interest  and  celebrated  with  a  fervor  heightened 
by  patriotism.  In  1861,  an  honorary  degree  was  conferred 
upon  Col.  Burnside.  In  1862,  the  valedictorian  appeared 
upon  the  stage  in  uniform ;  the  dinner  was  graced  by  the 
presence  of  the  Governors  of  Massachusetts,  New  Hamp- 
shire, Vermont,  and  Rhode  Island;  and  Governor  Andrew 
of  Massachusetts  delivered  an  eloquent  address.  In  1863 
the  principal  orator  was  George  William  Curtis,  who  spoke 
on  "Peace  Through  Victory";  and  the  youthful  John  Hay, 
who  had  returned  for  his  fifth  anniversary  reunion,  read 
a  poem.  It  was  in  y63,  too,  that  the  portrait  of  General 
Burnside,  which  now  hangs  in  Sayles  Hall,  was  presented 
to  the  University.  Shortly  afterward  portraits  of  Col. 
Christopher  Greene  and  Surgeon  Solomon  Drowne,  both 
Revolutionary  heroes,  and  of  General  Rodman,  who  fell  at 
Antietam,  were  added  to  our  hall  of  fame. 

The  never-to-be-forgotten  event  of  1864  was  the  Cen- 
tennial Celebration.  Hundreds  of  Alumni  returned;  the 
array  of  distinguished  guests  was  imposing;  the  procession 
to  the  old  Meeting  House  was  an  impressive  sight.  General 
Burnside  was  everywhere  greeted  with  applause.  Dr.  Sears 
reviewed  the  history  of  the  University ;  George  William 
Curtis,  Governor  Chase  of  Ohio,  and  many  others  delivered 
addresses.  Goldwin  Smith,  who  came  as  the  spokesman  of 
English  Liberalism  to  America,  was  the  recipient  of  an  hon- 
orary degree,  a  grateful  and  fitting  recognition  of  his 
staunch  advocacy  of  the  cause  of  the  Union  at  the  bar  of 
English  public  opinion.  John  Hay  could  not  be  present,  but 
sent  a  poem  which  was  read  by  Dr.  Angell.  The  celebration 


PROVIDENCE   IN   CIVIL   WAR   DAYS  109 

was  in  every  way  worthy  of  the  institution  and  in  keeping 
with  the  heroic  spirit  of  that  stern  and  glorious  time. 

And  now  with  the  revolving  months  we  have  come  to  the 
fall  of  '64.  Two  years  have  passed  since  we  left  the  City 
Fathers  orating  in  the  Market  Place,  two  years  compact 
with  tremendous  events.  But  lack  of  time  forbids  us  to  return 
and  rehearse  the  tale.  Nor  is  there  need ;  for  one  day  was  like 
unto  another,  and  life  rqoved  on,  now  faster,  now  slower, 
in  grooves  already  worn  deep  by  war.  Time  fails,  and  so  we 
must  hurry  past  Antietam,  where  General  Rodman  fell, 
and  the  brave  young  Ives;  past  the  bloody  slopes  of  Fred- 
ericksburg, where  Burnside,  deserving  better  fortune,  met 
repulse,  yet  without  loss  of  honor,  and  where  Curtis  and 
Sayles  found  a  glorious  death;  past  Salem  Heights, 
where  the  Second  Rhode  Island  held  the  right,  and  won 
imperishable  laurels;  past  Gettysburg,  where  our  Batteries, 
under  Hazard,  Arnold,  Jastram  and  Bucklin,  stood  their 
ground  under  the  hottest  fire  and  gave  back  shot  for  shot. 
Nor  can  we  stay  to  listen  to  the  bells  that  rang  out  the 
glorious  news  of  Gettysburg,  Vicksburg  and  Port  Hudson; 
nor  to  the  song  of  deliverance  that  went  up  from  a  people 
from  whose  hearts  a  great  weight  had  been  lifted;  nor  to 
the  prayers  of  thanksgiving,  in  which,  with  their  President, 
they  prayed  to  be  "led  through  paths  of  repentance  and  sub- 
mission to  the  Divine  Will  back  to  the  perfect  enjoyment  of 
Union  and  fraternal  peace." 

Once  more  the  country  was  called  upon  to  choose  a  Pres- 
ident. One  name  rose  spontaneously  to  the  lips  of  loyal 
men.  Only  he  who  had  led  them  thus  far  through  the  wil- 
derness of  war  could  be  trusted  to  lead  them  into  the  prom- 
ised land  of  peace.  "The  proper  person  to  succeed  Abraham 
Lincoln  is  Abraham  Lincoln,"  they  said;  "he  must  be 
re-elected."  And  Rhode  Island  set  about  to  do  her  full 
share  toward  re-electing  him.  The  campaign  culminated  in 
the  great  rally  of  October  29.  Never  before  had  such  a 
gathering  been  held  in  Rhode  Island.  From  far  and  near 
they  came,  15,000  persons,  pouring  into  Market  Square, 


110  RHODE  ISLAND  HISTORICAL  SOCIETY 

filling  every  inch  of  space  from  the  What  Cheer  building 
to  Turk's  Head,  and  overflowing  into  the  side  streets.  The 
Square  was  ablaze  with  lanterns  and  candles.  Mayor  Doyle 
presided,  and  Senator  Sprague  made  the  first  speech. 
Senator  Anthony  followed ;  then  Abraham  Payne,  Amos 
C.  Barstow,  Thomas  A.  Jenckes,  and  C.  A.  Updike.  General 
Burnside  also  spoke,  and  was  greeted  with  tumultuous 
applause. 

Four  days  later,  on  the  Wednesday  preceding  the  elec- 
tion, occurred  the  great  parade.  Let  an  eye-witness  describe 
the  scene:  "Every  part  of  the  State  had  its  representation. 
Men  were  here  from  the  shores  of  the  Pawcatuck  and  the 
Little  Narragansett,  greeting  their  political  brethren  from 
Buck  Hill  and  Chopmist.  The  hardy  fishermen  on  Point 
Judith  Pond  countermarched  by  the  delegations  from 
Branch  River  and  the  Beacon  Pole.  Men  from  Escoheag, 
Racoon  Hill  and  Nooseneck  gave  cheerful  countenance  and 
a  hearty  God-speed  to  their  fellow  patriots  from  Mt.  Hope 
and  Kickamuit.  Seaconnet  rolled  up  its  loyal  columns  until 
they  met  and  mingled  with  our  younger  freemen  from 
beyond  the  Seekonk."  It  was  an  army  with  banners ;  and  on 
their  banners  were  inscribed  such  sentiments  as,  "The  rail 
of  Secession  is  almost  split;  let  Father  Abraham  have  one 
more  blow" ;  "The  States  that  will  go  for  Abe  and  Andy, — 
the  United  States" ;  "New  England's  triple  Bs:  Burnside, 
Butler  and  Banks"; 

"To  save  the  Union 
We  want  no  Quack 
But  trust  again  to  Abe 
And  not  to  Little  Mac." 


PROVIDENCE  IN   CIVIL   WAR  DAYS  HI 

This  last  recalls  one  of  their  campaign  songs, 
"Oh,  can  the  tale  be  true,  boys? 
We  blush  with  shame  to  tell 
Of  the  Chicago  crew,  boys; 

And  do  you  mark  them  well! 
Our  Country's  faith  was  bartered  there 

Bv  the  unholy  tribe; 
But  we  the  guilt  will  never  share, 
Nor  take  the  Southern  bribe. 

For  good  old  Father  Abraham 

We'll  work  through  sun  and  rain; 

For  good  old  Father  Abraham 

We'll  work  with  might  and  main." 

And  after  the  parade  they  went  to  the  mammoth  tent,  which 
had  been  set  up  behind  the  Cove,  and  listened  to  speeches 
until  night  fell.  Little  wonder  that  Rhode  Island  voted 
almost  two  to  one  for  "Abe  and  Andy." 

The  war  was  drawing  to  a  close.  Atlanta  fell  in  Decem- 
ber 1864;  Charleston,  in  the  following  February.  Sher- 
man's March  had  broken  the  back  of  the  South;  the  col- 
lapse of  the  Confederacy  was  but  a  matter  of  time.  Lee, 
consummate  strategist  though  he  was,  could  not  forever 
hold  out  against  Grant's  terrible  pounding.  The  capture  of 
Charleston  was  celebrated  with  a  passionate  fervor,  tinged 
with  bitterness  at  the  recollection  of  Fort  Sumter. 

But  the  rejoicing  over  the  capture  of  Charleston  was 
as  nothing  compared  with  the  outburst  of  rapture  which 
followed  the  announcement  of  the  fall  of  Richmond  and 
the  surrender  of  Lee.  "The  Confederacy  is  dead;  the  Union 
still  lives,"  was  the  exulting  cry;  "The  stars  which  have 
been  obscured  on  the  old  flag  are  bursting  forth  again  in 
all  their  old  radiance  and  glory."  It  was  ten  o'clock  at  night 
when  the  news  was  received;  the  next  moment  it  was 
spreading  like  wildfire.  The  bells  began  to  ring;  Grace 
Church  chimes  struck  up  "Yankee  Doodle";  the  Marine 


112  RHODE  ISLAM)  HISTORICAL  SOCIETY 

Artillery  fired  a  salute.  All  the  city  came  running  into  the 
market  place.  The  crowd  surged  up  to  the  Journal  office. 
General  Burnside  was  already  there,  and  Senator  Anthony, 
Mr.  Updike,  and  Mr.  Angell.  Speeches  and  wild  cheers! 
Providence  was  fairly  beside  itself  with  joy.  "We  never  saw 
anything  like  it  before,"  said  the  Journal;  "It  was  good 
natured  delirium ;  it  was  joyous  frenzy.  Men  hardly  knew 
what  to  do  to  manifest  their  delight.  Think  of  grave,  gray- 
headed,  elderly  citizens  walking  solemnly  along  the  streets, 
pulling  at  doorbells  with  a  nervous  twitch,  as  if  to  say, 
'Why  don't  you  get  up  and  rejoice:'  The  moment  anyone 
shouted,  everybody  within  hearing  responded.  If  one  struck 
up  a  song,  everybody  sang.  If  one  started  'John  Brown,'  all 
were  ready  to  declare  that  'his  soul's  marching  on.'  If  a 
solemn  hymn  of  praise  to  God  was  begun,  instantly,  with 
heads  reverently  uncovered,  all  joined.  .  .  .  Some  one  pro- 
poses a  procession,  and  instantly  Westminster  Street  is 
half  filled  with  the  throng,  singing  and  shouting,  marching, 
they  knew  not  where,  they  cared  not  where.  If  Governor 
Dyer  had  led  the  way  to  Pawtucket  or  Woonsocket,  they 
were  then  in  the  mood  to  follow.  The  moment  a  fire  was 
kindled,  everybody  set  about  rolling  boxes  and  barrels  from 
every  alley  and  lane  within  a  quarter  of  a  mile  of  the 
bridge.  Some  one  shouts  that  the  recruiting  booths  are  no 
longer  needed,  and  they  straightway  are  turned  over  into 
the  fire  to  'recruit'  the  flames  while  police  look  on  with 
amazement,  and  the  steam  fire-engines  whistle  their  ap- 
plause. .  .  .  Such  over-flowing,  irrepressible,  unpremedi- 
tated, spontaneous  humor  and  jollity  we  never  saw  in  a 
crowd  before." 

And  then  —  ashes  for  beauty!  Once  more  the  iron- 
tongued  bells  and  the  deep-throated  guns  summon  the  citi- 
zens to  the  market  place;  this  time  in  solemn,  measured 
tones.  He  is  dead;  the  Nation's  Chief  is  dead;  and  it  is  as  if 
the  heart  of  the  Nation  itself  had  stopped  beating.  Horror 
and  grief  are  written  on  every  face.  Not  much  is  said; 
words  seem  feeble  and  empty;  only  tears  can  fully  express 


PROVIDENCE  IN   CIVIL  WAR  DAYS  113 

such  sorrow.  Silently  the  flags  are  lowered;  the  streets  are 
hung  with  black;  there  is  no  house  so  mean  and  poor  but 
it  has  its  bit  of  crepe.  Rich  and  poor,  high  and  low,  are  all 
one  in  common  bereavement.  It  is  as  if  the  Great  Death  had 
come  nigh  them  all. 

On  the  morrow  they  repair  to  their  churches  for  such 
consolation  as  only  religion  can  give.  As  evening  comes  on 
they  gather  in  front  of  the  home  of  the  beloved  Dr.  Way- 
land,  and  there,  in  the  midst  of  a  pouring  rain,  stand  silent 
and  attentive,  while  the  Venerable  Father  speaks  the  heal- 
ing word  which  brings  light  out  of  darkness  and  fills  them 
with  a  great  peace.  With  trembling  voices  they  sing,  "My 
country,  'tis  of  thee,"  and  "Praise  God  from  whom  all 
blessings  flow";  then  silently  descend  the  hill,  still  sor- 
rowing, but  not  as  those  who  have  no  hope.  It  was  Easter 
Sunday! 

On  Wednesday,  the  19th,  Lexington  Day,  they  joined 
with  their  fellow-countrymen  all  over  the  broad  land  in 
paying  funeral  honors  to  their  beloved  dead.  All  business 
was  suspended;  the  schools  were  closed;  services  were  held 
in  all  the  churches.  And  then,  with  muffled  drums  and 
draped  flags,  soldiers  and  citizens  marched  in  solemn  pro- 
cession, through  the  principal  streets  of  the  city,  and  finally 
into  Exchange  Place,  where  they  had  so  often  gathered; 
and  there  they  gave  a  last  salute  and  furled  their  standards, 
on  the  very  spot  where,  just  four  years  before  to  a  day, 
the  boys  of  the  First  Rhode  Island  had  unfurled  the 
banner  committed  to  their  keeping  by  the  loyal  women 
of  Providence. 


114  RIIODK  ISLAND  HISTORICAL  SOCIETY 


The  Providence  Horse  Guards  Flag  of  1842 

Brigadier  General  John  J.  Richards  recently  placed  in 
the  Society's  museum  the  historic  flag  of  the  Horse  Guards 
of  Providence  which  was  carried  in  1  842  at  the  time  of  the 
Dorr  War.  The  flag  is  of  bright  green  silk  42  inches  by 
32  inches  and  is  illustrated  in  this  issue  of  the  Collections. 
The  design  is  painted  on  two  pieces  of  silk  which  were 
sewed  back  to  back,  thus  making  the  flag. 

One  side  shows  a  man  on  horseback  with  drawn  sword,  a 
motive  drawn  from  a  picture  of  Napoleon  crossing  the  Alps. 
The  figures  are  gold,  shaded  with  the  detail  in  darker  gold 
and  scarlet.  The  letters  which  are  gold,  shaded  with  scarlet, 
are  about  1  j/2  inches  tall.  The  horse  and  horseman  face  the 
fly  of  the  flag.  The  other  side  of  the  flag,  which  was  also  of 
bright  green  silk,  bore  the  inscription  RHODE  ISLAND 
AND  ITS  GOVERNMENT  within  an  orle  of  eight  stars, 
and  with  two  additional  stars  filling  the  vacant  spaces  at  the 
ends  of  the  middle  text  line.  The  letters  of  the  word 
RHODE  ISLAND  are  gold,  edged  with  scarlet,  and 
shaded  with  orange  red,  the  other  letters  are  gold,  edged 
with  scarlet,  and  the  stars  gold,  edged  with  scarlet,  and 
shaded  with  blue.  The  design  on  each  side  of  the  flag  is 
enclosed  within  a  rectangular  border  stripe  of  gold,  edged 
with  scarlet.  The  flag  was  edged  with  gold  fringe. 


HORSE  GUARDS  FLAG 


HORSE  GUARDS  FLAG 

(Reverse) 


CUMBERLAND  SEAL  117 


Cumberland  Seal 


The  ancient  seal  of  the  Town  Council  of  Cumberland 
appears  on  a  number  of  documents  in  the  archives  of  the 
Rhode  Island  Historical  Society.  The  device  is  a  garb  en- 
signed  by  a  dove  with  wings  raised,  between  a  snake  pale- 
wise  undy  contourne  and  a  lion  rampant,  with  around  the 
circumference  of  the  seal  the  motto  Strength  Peace 
Plenty  Wisdom.  The  seal  is  oval  being  11/16  by  3/4 
inches.  It  appears  in  black  wax,  in  red  wax  and  in  paper,  on 
documents  dated  1786  to  1790  in  the  volume  of  Ballou 
Papers. 

One  document  contains  the  following  sentence:  "Given 
at  a  Town  Council  held  in  and  for  the  Town  of  Cumber- 
land aforesaid  the  twenty-first  day  of  June  Anno  Domini 
1788.  .  .  .  Sealed  with  the  Seal  of  the  said  Town  Council," 
thus  definitely  identifying  the  seal  as  that  of  the  Town 
Council  of  Cumberland. 

For  other  Rhode  Island  municipal  seals,  see  emblems 
of  rhode  island,  published  by  the  Rhode  Island  His- 
torical Society  in  1930. 


118  RHODE  ISLAND  HISTORICAL  SOCIETY 


Privateers  of  1798 

"Abstract  of  all  the  Applications  made  to  Jereh.  Olney, 
Collector  of  the  Customs  for  the  District  of  Providence,  for 
Commissions  for  private  armed  Vessels,  which  were  issued 
previous  to  this  1  8th.  Day  of  January  1 799. 

The  Commissions  are  not  Numbered;  nor  were  the  Boys 
distinguished  in  the  Applications,  from  the  Men. 

Ship  Palmyra,  commander  Cornelius  Sowle;  2nd  officer 
Edward  Mark;  3rd  officer  Charles  L.  Hyatt;  227  tons 
49/95ths;  10  three  pounders,  4  eighteen  pound  Cannon- 
ades; 20  men;  owned  by  Jno.  I.  Clark  and  Wm.  F.  Megee 
of  Providence,  R.  Island;  date  of  commission  12th  Oct. 
1798. 

Ship  Dolphin;  commander  John  Dunwell;  2nd  officer 
Geo.  W.  Allen;  no  second  mate;  139  tons;  2  four  pound- 
ers; 12  men;  owned  by  Stephen  Dexter  of  Providence,  R. 
Island;  date  of  commission  16th  Oct.  1798. 

Ship  Independence;  commander  Isaac  Parker;  2nd  offi- 
cer Richard  Hutchins;  3rd  officer  Wm.  Armington;  150 
tons;  20/95ths;  1 2  four  pounders;  20  men;  owned  by  Geo. 
Lane  of  Charleston,  Massachusetts;  date  of  commission  12 
December  1798. 

Ship  Rebecca;  commander  Benja.  Tayer;  2nd  officer 
Richard  Brown;  3rd  officer  John  Benthall;  231  tons; 
62/95ths;  2  six  pounders;  18  men;  owned  by  Stephen 
Dexter  of  Providence,  R.  I.,  date  of  commission  1  5  Decem- 
ber 1798. 

Custom  House,  Providence  18th  Janv.  1799,  Jereh. 
Olney  Coll." 

(  From  original  manuscript  in  the  archives  of  the  Rhode 
Island  Historical  Society,  Olney  Papers  III,  67.) 


THE  PONAGANSET  DUGOUT  119 


The  Ponaganset  Dugout 

A  dugout  recently  found  at  the  bottom  of  Ponaganset 
Pond  in  western  Glocester,  R.  I.,  was,  through  the  thought- 
fulness  and  efforts  of  Mr.  John  C.  Brown  of  Woonsocket, 
placed  in  the  lecture  hall  of  the  Rhode  Island  Historical 
Society  where  it  has  Tjeen  viewed  by  a  large  number  of 
interested  persons. 

Five  illustrations  of  the  dugout  appear  on  the  accom- 
panying pages,  four  showing  the  dugout  floating  on  the 
waters  of  Ponaganset  Pond  and  one  showing  it  in  the  lecture 
hall  of  the  Society.  The  dugout  is  about  13  feet  9  inches 
long,  28  inches  wide  at  one  end  and  22  inches  at  the  other. 
The  bottom  has  been  smoothed  to  make  a  flat  surface.  The 
log,  which'is  chestnut,  was  hollowed  out  to  a  depth  of  about 
14  inches,  leaving  the  bottom  about  4  inches  thick  at  the 
quarter  and  tapering  in  thickness  to  a  couple  of  inches  near 
the  ends.  The  sides  of  the  dugout  have  been  partly  broken 
away  by  time  and  wear. 

Dr.  Harry  Lee  Barnes,  in  the  Rhode  Island  Historical 
Society  Collections  for  July  1922,  page  85,  recorded  that  a 
dugout  was  found  many  years  ago  in  Wallum  Lake,  about 
eight  miles  north  of  Ponaganset  Pond. 

Accounts  of  the  finding  of  the  dugout  were  published  in 
the  Providence  Sunday  Journal  of  July  15,1 934,  and  in  the 
Evening  Bulletins  of  July  17  (country  edition)  and 
July  23. 


120 


THK   PON'ACANSKT   Dl'COUT 


V^                  *!     • 

*"^^B          Ilk w  i?»w  ■ 

P^  Br ': 

&    ^b. 

THE  PONAGANSET  DUGOUT 


121 


122 


THE  PONAGANSET  DUGOUT 


NEW  PUBLICATIONS  123 


New  Publications  of  Rhode  Island  Interest 

An  article  on  the  Gazette  Francoise  of  Newport,  1708- 
81,  by  Allen  J.  Barthold  appeared  in  the  Papers  of  the 
Bibliographical  Society  of  America,  1934,  and  also  was 
reprinted  in  pamphlet  form. 

The  New  England  Quarterly  for  June  1934  contains  an 
article  on  Roger  Williams  and  Massachusetts  by  George 
Albert  Stead. 

Genealogy  of  the  Descendants  of  William  Turpin 
Thayer  of  Bellingham  (Mass.),  by  Luis  Thayer  Ojeda  is  a 
pamphlet  of  43  pages  recently  printed  at  Valparaiso,  Chile. 

The  Narragansett  Planters  by  William  Davis  Miller  is  a 
pamphlet  of  69  pages,  dealing  with  the  early  history  of  the 
South  County,  reprinted  from  the  Proceedings  of  the 
American  Antiquarian  Society. 


Notes 

The  following  persons  have  been  elected  to  membership 
in  the  Society: 

Mrs.  George  A.  Dame 
Mr.  Charles  A.  Keller 


124 


KIIOD!-:   ISLAND  HISTORICAL  SOl'ILTY 


Colonial  Heraldry 


Ballou 

On  a  deed*  from  Joseph  Lapham  to  Abner  Ballou  of 
Cumberland,  R.  I.,  dated  December  24,  1772,  Lapham 
sealed  with  an  armorial  seal  which  bears  the  Ballou  arms. 
The  arms  are  fretty.  The  Bellew  arms  as  given  by  Burke 
are:  Sable  fretty  or.  The  crest  on  this  seal  is  two  flaming 
hearts  which  differs  from  the  crest  as  given  by  Burke. 


♦Ballou  Papers,  p.  1  3,  R.  I.  H.  S. 


INDIAN    IMPLEMENTS   FOUND   IN    RIIODK    ISLAND 


125 


BIRD  STONE,      TWO  AND  A  HALF  INCHES  LONG,  FOUND  ON 
CHAMPLIN     FARM,    CHARLESTOVVN 


^. 


PENDANT,  TWO  AND  A  HALF  INCHES  TALL,   FOUND  ON   GREAT  ISLAND 
IN   POINT  JUDITH   POND 

This  pendant  shows  the  influence  of  European  civilization 

///  the  collection  of  Daniel  P.  Sherman 


126 


INDIAN    IMPLEMENTS   FOUND  IN    RHODK    ISLAND 


V 


JASPER   SPEAR    HEAD,   FIVE   INCHES 

LONG,  FOUND  NEAR  BARBER  POND, 

SOUTH   KINGSTOWN 


KNIFE,    TEN    INCHES   LONG, 
FOUND  AT  ESCOHEAG  HILL,  R.  I. 

///  the  collection  of  Daniel  P.  Sherman 
of  Wake  field,  R.  I. 


THE  WESTCONNAUG   PURCHASE  127 


GORGET,  FOUR  AND  THREE-QUARTERS  INCHES  LONG,  FOUND   ON  SHERMAN 
FARM,   POINT   JUDITH    POND,    NARRAGANSETT 

/;/  the  collection  of  Daniel  P.  Sherman 


The  Minutes  of  the  Westconnaug  Purchase 

Transcribed  by  Theodore  G.  Foster 

{Concluded  from  -page  61) 

At  a  Meeting  of  the  Proprietors  and  Owners  of  the 
Lands  in  Westquanaug  Purchase  held  in  the  House  of 
Fleet  Brown  in  Scituate  in  said  Purchase  on  the  First  of 
May  1 779    ...    By  virtue  of  a  Warrant  at  the  Request 
of  Sundry  of  the  Proprietors  of  said  Purchase  Signed  by 
John  Westcot  Esq  Dated  the  1 2th  Day  of  March  1 779 
George  Taylor  chosen  Moderator 
Fleet  Brown  Chosen  Proprietors  Clerk 
Voted  that  the  Meeting  be  adjourned  to  the  last  Monday 
of  October  next  at  1  °Clock  P  M  at  the  Dwelling  House  of 
Fleet  Brown  in  Scituate 

Fleet  Brown  Proprietors  Clerk 


128  RHODE  ISLAND  HISTORICAL  SOCIETY 

Whereas  Request  hath  been  made  to  Me  one  of  the 
States  Justices  of  Peace  in  the  town  of  Scituate  in  the 
county  of  Providence  &c  by  Seven  of  the  Purchasers  and 
Owners  of  the  Lands  of  Westquanaug  in  Scituate  request- 
ing a  Warrant  may  be  issued  to  warn  said  Owners  to  meet 
together  at  the  House  at  Mr  Fleet  Brown's  in  Scituate  in 
Westquanaug  on  Saturday  the  First  Day  of  May  next  at 
one  °Clock  in  said  Day  in  order  to  choose  a  New  Clerk  to 
the  said  Purchase  in  the  Room  of  Thomas  Brown  Esq 
Deceased 

These  are  therefore  in  the  Name  of  the  State  of 
Rhode  Island  &c 

To  the  Town  Serjeant  or  any  of  the  constables  in  the  Town 
of  Scituate  forthwith  or  Signt  hereof  to  warn  and  give 
timely  Notice  to  the  Owners  of  the  Westquanaug  Lands  to 
meet  at  the  House  of  Mr  Fleet  Brown  in  Scituate  in  said 
Westquanaug  on  Saturday  the  First  Day  of  May  next  at 
one  of  the  Clock  in  the  afternoon  of  said  Day  in  order  to 
Choose  a  new  Clerk  to  said  Purchase  in  the  Room  of 
Thomas  Brown  Esq  Deceased:  also  to  do  any  other  Business 
that  may  concern  the  Safety  and  Well  Ordering  said  Own- 
ers and  Purchasers  Lands  and  Records  Hereof  fail  not 
But  make  Return  of  this  Warrant  with  your  Doings  at  said 
Time  and  Place  above  Given  under  my  Hand  &  Seal  at 
Scituate  the  12th  Day  of  March  A  D  1779 

John  Westcot  Jus  Peace 

Providence  Scituate  April  23d   1779     Then  by 

Virtue  of  this  within  Warrant  I  notified  the  within  men- 
tioned Proprietors  or  Owners  of  Lands  in  said  Purchase  to 
meet  to  gether  at  Time  and  Place  within  mentiond  as  the 
Law  directs  Wm  Tyler  Jun  Const 

The  Two  foregoing  Papers  contain  a  true  Copy  of  the 
Original  Warrant  and  the  Officers  Return 

Fleet  Brown  Proprietors  Clerk 

The  End 


Form  of  Legacy 


"/  give  and  bequeath  to  the  Rhode  Island 


Historical  Society  the  sum  of 

dollars/' 
. «  \ 


Roger  Williams  Press 


m 


E.  A.  Johnson  Co. 


PROVIDENCE 


Rhode    Island 

Historical  Society 

Collections 


Vol.  XXVIII  JANUARY,   1935 


No.   1 


JACKET   WORN    BY   OLIVER   HAZARD    PERRY 
VT  THE   BATTLE  OF  LAKE  ERIE 

//;  the  Society's  Museum. 


Issued  Quarterly 


68  Waterman  Street,  Providence,  Rhode  Island 


CONTENTS 


PAGE 

Commodore  Perry's  Jacket  ....    Cover 

Roger  Williams'  Contribution  to  Modern  Thought 

by  Frederick  Bernays  Wiener       ...  1 

Cheese  Making  in  Old  South  County 

by  Albert  E.  Lownes  .         .         .         .         21 

Cocumcussoc      .         .         .         .         .  .  .  25 

Notes 25 

New  Publications  of  Rhode  Island  Interest    .         .  26 

List  of  Members        ......  27 


• 


,,..=V':T,H'  '"a: 


zPrza&p 


RHODE    M^Wai   ISLAND 
HISTORICAL    ^MAj|/j  SOCIETY 


COLLECTIONS 


Vol.  XXVIII  JANUARY,   1935  No.  1 

H.  Anthony  Dyer,  President         Gilbert  A.  Harrington,  Treasurer 
Howard  W.  Preston,  Secretary  Howard  M.  Chapin,  Librarian 

The  Society  assumes  no  responsibility  for  the  statements  or  the  opinions 
of  contributors. 


Roger  Williams'  Contribution  to 
Modern  Thought 

By  Frederick  Bernays  Wiener 

Read  bejore  the  Society  on  February  5,  1931 

On  the  5th  of  February,  in  the  year  163  1,  the  good  ship 
"Lyon"  dropped  anchor  off  Nantasket ;  and  John  Winthrop 
noted  in  his  Journal  that  among  her  passengers  she  carried 
one  "Mr.  Williams,  a  godly  minister." 

Today  we  celebrate  the  three-hundredth  anniversary  of 
Roger  Williams'  arrival  in  America.  But  I  take  it  it  is  not 
simply  to  mark  the  passage  of  time  that  we  are  met  tonight. 
When  we  celebrate  the  coming  to  the  New  World  of  him 
who  founded  our  State,  necessarily  we  must  commemorate 
the  ideas  and  thoughts  which  he  expounded,  and  the  prin- 
ciples with  which  his  name  is  inseparably  associated.  These 
principles,  those  ideas  and  thoughts,  still  live  today — not 
as  archaic  survivals,  but  as  vital,  time-tested  truths.  We  be- 
lieve in  them  today,  and  I  suppose  that  means  they  are 
modern.  That  is  an  adjective  which  lately  has  been  much 


2  RHODE  ISLAND  HISTORICAL  SOCIETY 

abused.  For  a  time,  every  new  fad,  every  shiny  novelty, 
every  ephemeral  bit  of  superficial  froth,  has  called  itself 
modern  i  and  consequently  the  word  has  been  suspect,  and, 
under  the  circumstances,  doubtless  rightly  so.  But  I  mean 
by  modern,  in  its  best  sense,  that  which  combines  the  utmost 
of  enlightenment  with  the  utmost  respect  for  ancient  truths 
— for  there  are  ancient  truths  as  well  as  ancient  prejudices 
— which  is  to  say,  the  utmost  progressiveness  compatible 
with  progress. 

So  much  has  been  written  about  Roger  Williams — and 
doubtless  much  more  said,  which  was  not  deemed  worth 
preserving — that  one  approaches  the  subject  with  hesita- 
tion, almost  with  reluctance.  But  there  may  still  be  justifica- 
tion for  an  attempt.  For,  like  an  ancient  formula  grown 
meaningless  with  constant  repetition,  so  has  it  been  with  the 
story  of  Roger  Williams:  the  obvious  facts  of  his  life  have 
been  so  often  told  that  their  reiteration  almost  has  deadened 
our  sensibilities,  and  we  are  in  danger,  in  our  preoccupation 
with  the  story,  of  losing  and  forgetting  its  significance.  Too 
often  our  reaction  to  Roger  Williams  is  a  condescending 
shrug:  "Great  man,"  we  murmur,  "far  ahead  of  his  time," 
— quite  oblivious  to  the  fact  that  he  is  still  in  many  aspects 
ahead  of  our  time  as  well,  and  that  for  a  number  of  his  ideas 
we  ourselves  are  not,  for  the  most  part,  wholly  prepared. 

I  shall  not  try,  in  attempting  to  outline  some  of  those 
ideas,  to  "reinterpret"  Roger  Williams.  There  is  something 
false  and  specious  about  that  term,  and  generally  it  is  synon- 
ymous with  "misinterpret."  Just  as  a  biography  inevitably 
shades  into  an  autobiography,  so  a  history  usually  shows 
more  than  traces  of  the  historian ;  and  it  is  matter  of  common 
knowledge  that  historical  writing  has  often  been  more  actu- 
ated by  a  desire  to  prove  a  thesis  already  formulated,  than 
by  the  scientific  urge  to  discover  "Wie  es  elgentlich  gewesen 
war."  I  shall  hope,  therefore,  to  escape  the  charge  of  pre- 
senting the  subject  to  fit  my  own  preconceived  notions ;  and 
equally,  I  hope  to  avoid  that  untruthful  gloss  which,  so  it 
seems,  all  too  often  accompanies  celebrations.   Certainly 


ROGER  WILLIAMS    CONTRIBUTION 


it  is  not  necessary  to  have  to  warn  this  Society  of  the  dangers 
of  the  "filio-pietistic"  approach  to  the  past,  or  to  remind 
you,  as  Charles  Francis  Adams  had  to  remind  his  colleagues 
in  Massachusetts,  that  historical  societies  are  after  all  scien- 
tific bodies.  It  may  be  that  the  ancestor  worship  to  the  north 
and  east  of  us  is  one  of  those  bits  of  Chinese  culture  that  the 
Canton  merchants  brought  back  to  Salem  ;  I  do  not  know. 
But  I  have  observed  that  it  is  easier  to  speak  of  the  founders 
of  Rhode  Island  without  the  gloss  of  reverent  and  euphe- 
mistic apology  than  it  is  to  treat  of  those  of  Massachusetts, 
and  I  conclude,  and  doubtless  you  will  not  quarrel  with  the 
conclusion,  that  the  former  were  a  more  attractive  set  of 
people. 

I  shall  not  undertake  to  tell  you  of  Roger  Williams'  life. 
But  I  do  wish  to  linger  for  a  moment  on  what  for  us  is  per- 
haps the  most  significant  event,  and  the  most  dramatic,  of 
all  his  significant  and  dramatic  life:  I  mean  his  banishment 
from  Massachusetts. 

Williams'  banishment — or  enlargement,  as  it  is  more 
usually  referred  to  in  a  neighboring  Commonwealth — came 
as  the  climax  of  a  storm  that  had  been  brewing  for  some 
time.  No  sooner  had  Williams  returned  to  Salem  from 
Plymouth  in  the  fall  of  1633  than  he  began  that  almost 
constant  dispute  with  the  theocracy  which  did  not  end  until 
he  found  himself  wandering  in  the  snow,  cast  out  into  the 
wilderness.  I  shall  not  treat  in  any  detail  of  his  minor  dis- 
putes— his  discussion  of  whether  women  should  go  veiled, 
his  arguments  that  the  English  churches  were  un-Christian, 
his  contention  that  the  meetings  of  ministers  would  en- 
gender a  "presbytery  or  superintendency  to  the  prejudice 
of  the  church's  liberty."  The  best  that  can  be  said  of  some  of 
these  manifestations  of  an  admittedly  contentious  tempera- 
ment is  that  they  are  incidents  of  Williams'  "Sturm-  und 
Drang"  period.  Not  much  more  can  be  said  for  his  insistence 
(which  stirred  John  Endecott  to  action)  that  the  red  cross  of 
St.  George  must  be  cut  out  of  the  flag.  It  is  with  Williams' 


4  RHODE  ISLAND  HISTORICAL  SOCIETY 

remaining  beliefs,  which  more  directly  caused  his  exile,  that 
we  have  our  concern;  and  these  stand  on  other  ground. 

Roger  Williams  proclaimed  that  the  Massachusetts 
Charter  was  invalid  as  a  grant  of  title,  in  that  it  failed  to 
recognize  the  rights  of  the  Indians;  and  he  announced  cer- 
tain of  its  recitals,  declaring  King  James  to  be  the  first 
Christian  prince  to  have  discovered  this  country,  to  be 
solemn  public  lies.  These  declarations,  in  the  face  of  news 
that  a  governor-general  might  be  appointed,  wrought  con- 
sternation among  the  magistrates.  When  they  then  at- 
tempted to  secure  the  loyalty  of  the  people  through  an  Oath 
of  fidelity,  they  were  met  by  Williams'  contention  that  the 
oath  was  an  act  of  prayer,  and  that  it  should  not  be  tendered 
an  unregenerate  man.  Accordingly,  in  order  to  punish  the 
Salem  church  for  the  conduct  of  its  minister,  the  magistrates 
refused  to  set  off  land  to  it;  Williams  appealed  to  the  other 
churches,  and  roundly  denounced  the  authorities.  And, 
furthermore,  he  had  attacked  the  very  foundations  of  the 
theocracy;  he  had  declared,  in  words  that  Winthrop  has 
preserved  for  us,  "That  the  magistrate  ought  not  to  punish 
the  breach  of  the  first  table,  otherwise  than  in  such  cases  as 
did  disturb  the  civil  peace."  (The  first  table  of  Decalogue, 
of  course,  consists  of  the  first  four  Commandments  which 
define  the  duties  of  man  to  God;  the  second  table  deals  with 
duties  between  man  and  man. ) 

There  was  little  more  for  the  General  Court  to  do.  It 
appointed  disputants  to  argue  with  Williams,  knowing  full 
well  that  these  could  not  possibly  hope  to  convince  him. 
The  solemn  farce  dragged  on  a  while;  the  only  issue,  in  this 
as  in  all  other  state  trials,  everywhere  and  in  all  ages,  was, 
"Is  this  the  kind  of  man  that  we  want  to  get  rid  of?"  And 
as  that  question  had  already  been  answered,  the  judgment 
of  banishment  was  passed,  "all  the  ministers,  save  one,  ap- 
proving the  sentence." 

Was  the  banishment  illegal:  Or  was  it  justified  by  that 
clause  of  the  charter  which  gave  the  Massachusetts  Bay 
power  "to  expulse  all  such  person  and  persons  as  should  at 


ROGER  WILLIAMS    CONTRIBUTION  D 

any  time  attempt  or  enterprise  detriment  or  annoyance  to 
their  plantation  or  its  inhabitants"?  For  myself,  I  incline  to 
think  that  it  was  thus  justified,  that  the  action  taken  was  per- 
fectly proper  from  a  legal  standpoint.  Whether  it  was  a 
wise  thing  to  do  is  quite  another  question,  as  I  shall  hope 
presently  to  show;  but  it  is  worth  noting  that  a  great  many 
of  the  tyrannies  of  this  world  have  proceeded  under  color  of 
law.  It  is  now  abundantly  clear,  for  instance,  that  Parlia- 
ment was  well  within  its  powers  in  taxing  the  Colonies;  and 
lest  that  remark  should  unduly  alarm  you,  I  would  recall 
to  your  attention  that  almost  all  of  the  colonial  lawyers 
were  Tories.  Their  legal  learning  told  them  Parliament  was 
right,  and  they  had  not  the  wit  to  realize  how  wrong  it  was 
none  the  less. 

But  back  to  Roger  Williams.  The  other,  and  perhaps 
most  burning  question  connected  with  his  banishment,  is 
whether  the  cause  of  his  expulsion  was  political  or  religious. 
On  this  point  controversy  has  ranged  long  and  fiercely.  The 
loyal  Rhode  Islander  would  stoutly  maintain  that  the  causes 
were  purely  religious;  the  son  of  Massachusetts  would  as 
vehemently  assert  that  the  operative  reasons  were  entirely 
political.  It  seems  to  me  that  neither  is  wrong,  and  that  each 
is  partially  right.  But  in  truth,  it  is  impossible  thus  to  dissect 
the  matter,  for  in  a  theocracy  the  religious  and  political  are 
inseparably  and  indistinguishably  blended.  That  is  of  the 
essence  of  theocracy.  Political,  religious — those  are  simply 
two  aspects  of  the  same  thing,  and  to  insist  on  one  to  the  total 
exclusion  of  the  other  is  not  of  much  assistance  either  in 
posing  or  in  solving  the  problem. 

It  is  interesting  in  passing  to  observe  that  a  contemporary 
called  the  Massachusetts  practice  of  punishing  religious 
opinions  "as  breaches  of  the  civill  peace  and  disturbances 
to  the  Commonwealth,"  "a  pretty  fine  distinction  to  deceive 
themselves  with."  Those  were  the  words,  not  of  a  follower 
of  Roger  Williams,  but  of  the  Rev.  Thomas  Edwards,  an 
adversary,  who  in  his  time  attacked  Williams  under  the 
resounding  title,  "Casting  down  of  the  last  and  strongest 


6  RHODE  ISLAND  HISTORICAL  SOCIETY 

hold  of  Satan;  or,  A  treatise  against  toleration  and  pre- 
tended liberty  of  conscience." 

I  think  it  may  be  said  with  perfect  truth  that  Williams 
was  expelled  for  spreading  ideas  that  were  unpopular  with 
the  rulers  of  the  colony,  and  for  uttering  those  ideas  pub- 
licly. The  strongest  evidence  in  support  of  this  statement  is 
the  record  of  the  General  Court  itself,  which  surely  would 
not  understate  Williams'  offenses: 

"Whereas  [  it  recites]  Mr  Roger  Williams,  one  of  the  elders 
of  the  church  of  Salem,  hath  broached  &  dyvulged  divers  newe 
dangerous  opinions,  against  the  aucthoritie  of  magistrates,  as  also 
writ  Ires  of  defamacon,  both  of  the  magistrates  &  churches  here, 
&  that  before  any  conviccon  &  yet  mainetaineth  the  same  with- 
out retraccon,  it  is  therefore  ordered  that  the  said  Mr  Williams 
shall  depte  out  of  this  juristiccon  within  sixe  weekes  nexte 
ensueing  *  *  *" 

Now,  what  were  these  "newe  and  dangerous  opinions"? 
It  is  there  that  we  must  seek  the  cause  of  his  banishment, 
and  it  seems  to  me  that  the  evidence  supports  the  classical 
Rhode  Island  view,  that  Williams  was  expelled  for  his 
advocacy  of  Soul  Liberty,  for  his  assertion  that  the  magis- 
trate should  not  punish  for  matters  of  conscience.  Of  late 
years  this  view  has  been  questioned,  and  modern  writers 
have  all  but  demolished  it.  But  let  us  see. 

Let  us  begin  with  the  record.  That  recites  that  Williams 
spoke  "against  the  aucthoritie  of  magistrates."  This  is  en- 
tirely consistent  with  the  notion  that  he  would  have  limited 
"the  aucthoritie  of  magistrates"  to  temporal  matters;  but 
obviously  it  is  ambiguous.  Let  us  then  go  beyond  the  record, 
and  examine  unofficial  testimony. 

Winthrop  in  his  Journal  noted  down  the  "divers  danger- 
ous opinions"  for  which  Williams  was  under  question,  and 
first  among  them  he  put  that  respecting  liberty  of  con- 
science, in  words  which  I  have  already  quoted.  That  would 
seem  to  be  a  strong  indication  of  the  importance  Winthrop 
attached  to  the  matter. 

Then  there  is  John  Cotton,  a  power  in  the  theocracy,  who 
also  catalogued  Williams'  opinions.  One  of  those  was,  in 


ROGER  WILLIAMS    CONTRIBUTION  / 

Cotton's  words,  "that  Civill  Magistrates  power  extends 
only  to  the  Bodies,  and  Goods  and  outward  state  of  man 
&c";  and  Williams  himself  agreed  that  Cotton's  summary 
was  accurate. 

We  have  then  four  sources:  the  record,  Winthrop,  Cot- 
ton, and  Williams  (concurring  with  Cotton).  The  last  three 
are  all  agreed  as  to  Liberty  of  Conscience  being  a  cause  of 
the  banishment,  and  the  record  does  not  dispute  them.  It 
seems  to  me  that  the  cumulative  effect  is  very  weighty,  and 
while  this  analysis  can  hardly  be  the  last  word  in  so  con- 
tested a  matter,  I  find  it  more  convincing  than  the  usual 
inquiry  which  seeks  to  divide  the  problem  into  political  or 
religious. 

And  after  all,  though  Williams'  other  arguments  were 
annoying,  and  might  cause  the  Bay  trouble  at  home,  his  plea 
for  Liberty  of  Conscience  shook  at  the  very  foundation  of 
theocracy.  The  Massachusetts  leaders  saw  that  clearly,  and 
hence  they  banished  him — not  so  much,  perhaps,  by  way  of 
punishment,  but  more  to  protect  their  anomalous  institu- 
tion. They  knew  their  church-state  could  not  weather  the 
storm  of  Roger  Williams'  ideas,  and  so  against  those  they 
never  relaxed  their  strict  quarantine. 

I  shall  not  now  essay  to  trace  the  origins  of  the  idea  or 
religious  liberty,  or  to  seek  the  faint  beginnings  of  the 
thought  that  church  and  state  were  better  separated.  Well 
before  Williams  various  individuals  had  stumbled  upon  the 
idea,  had  published  it  in  fugitive  pamphlets,  or,  perhaps, 
disseminated  it  within  small  circles.  But  Roger  Williams, 
though  not  the  first  to  discover  the  principles  of  religious 
liberty,  was  the  first  to  proclaim  them  in  all  their  plenitude, 
and  to  build  upon  them  a  political  state.  Today  we  regard 
religious  liberty  and  separation  of  church  and  state  as  axio- 
matic— which  is  to  say  modern — and  we  find  it  difficult  to 
conceive  of  living  under  any  other  system.  It  is  such  a  sen- 
sible solution,  and  such  a  simple  one.  Even  so  sharp  a  critic  as 
Professor  Harold  Laski  —  who  would  be  called  modern 


8  RHODE  ISLAND  HISTORICAL  SOCIETY 

under  any  definition — believes  it  to  be  the  only  manageable 
way. 

"I  cannot  avoid  the  conclusion  [he  writes  in  'Liberty  in  the 
Modern  State']  that  in  this  historic  realm  only  the  American 
principle  of  complete  separation  and  non-interference  can 
produce  freedom.  Unless  state  and  church  pursue  an  independ- 
ent path,  liberty  is  sacrificed;  for  either  fusion  or  partnership 
will,  in  fact,  involve  a  conflict  for  supremacy." 

And  this  "American  principle,"  I  need  not  remind  you, 
was  the  principle  formulated  by  Roger  Williams  in  1644, 
in  his  work,  "The  Bloudy  Tenent  of  Persecution  for  the 
Cause  of  Conscience."  Here  are  his  own  words: 

"All  Civill  States  with  their  Officers  of  Justice  in  their  re- 
spective constitutions  and  administrations  are  proved  essentially 
Civill,  and  therefore  not  fudges,  Governours  or  Defendeurs  of 
the  Spirituall  or  Christian  state  or  Worship.  *  *  *  It  is  the  will 
and  command  of  God,  that  (since  the  coming  of  his  Sonne  the 
Lord  Jesus)  a  permission  of  the  most  Paganish,  Jewish, Turkish, 
or  Antichristian  consciences  and  worships,  bee  granted  to  all 
men  in  all  Nations  and  Countries:  and  they  are  onely  to  bee 
fought  against  with  that  Sword  which  is  only  (in  soule  matters 
able  to  conquer,  to  wit,  the  Sword  of  Gods  Spirit,  the  Word  of 
God.  *  *  *  God  requireth  not  an  uniformity  of  Religion  to  be 
inacted  and  inforced  in  any  civill  state;  Which  inforccd  uni- 
formity (sooner  or  later)  is  the  greatest  occasion  of  civill  Warre, 
ravishing  of  consciences,  persecuting  of  Christ  Jesus  in  his  serv- 
ants, and  of  the  hypocrisie  and  destruction  of  millions  of  souls. 
*  *  *  An  inforced  uniformity  of  Religion  throughout  a 
Nation  or  civill  state,  confounds  the  Civill  and  Religious,  denies 
the  principles  of  Christianity  and  civility,  and  Jesus  Christ  is 
come  in  the  Flesh.  *  *  *  True  civility  and  Christianity  may 
both  flourish  in  a  state  or  Kingdom,  notwithstanding  the  per- 
mission of  divers  and  contrary  consciences,  either  of  Jews  or 
Gentiles." 

But  Williams  understood  fully  that  authority  was  nec- 
essary in  civil  things.  You  will  remember,  even  when  he  first 
announced  that  the  jurisdiction  of  the  state  should  not  ex- 
tend to  religious  matters,  that  he  made  the  important  quali- 
fication:"* *  *  otherwise  than  in  such  cases  as  did  disturb 
the  civil  peace."  It  is  a  matter  for  admiring  amazement,  for 
me  at  any  rate,  that  Roger  Williams  should  have  seen  so 


ROGER  WILLIAMS    CONTRIBUTION  9 

clearly,  at  the  very  start,  the  limitations  of  the  new,  aston- 
ishing idea  which  he  proclaimed.  I  marvel  at  the  wisdom  of 
the  man,  that  he  should,  long  before  the  notion  could  pos- 
sibly be  tried  out,  foresee  its  probable  and  proper  extent. 
That  he  should  later  discover  it,  is,  of  course,  not  half  so 
remarkable,  although  his  phrasing  of  the  problem  has  be- 
come classical.  Let  me  read  you  his  "Parable  of  the  Ship  of 
State": 

"There  goes  many  a  snip  to  sea,  with  many  hundred  souls  in 
one  ship,  whose  weal  and  woe  is  common,  and  is  a  true  picture 
of  a  commonwealth,  or  a  human  combination  or  society.  It  hath 
fallen  out  sometimes,  that  both  papists  and  protestants,  Jews  and 
Turks,  may  be  embarked  in  one  ship;  upon  which  proposal  I 
affirm,  that  all  the  liberty  of  conscience,  that  ever  I  pleaded  for, 
turns  upon  these  two  hinges — that  none  of  the  papists,  protes- 
tants, Jews,  or  Turks,  be  forced  to  come  to  the  ship's  prayers 
and  worship,  nor  compelled  from  their  own  particular  prayers 
or  worship,  if  they  practice  any.  I  further  add,  that  I  never 
denied,  that  notwithstanding  this  liberty,  the  commander  of 
this  ship  ought  to  command  the  ship's  course,  yea,  and  also 
command  that  justice,  peace  and  sobriety  be  kept  and  prac- 
ticed, both  among  the  seamen  and  all  the  passengers.  If  any  of 
the  seamen  refuse  to  perform  their  services,  or  passengers  to  pay 
their  freight;  if  any  refuse  to  help,  in  person  or  purse,  toward 
the  common  charges  of  defence;  if  any  refuse  to  obey  the 
common  laws  and  orders  of  the  ship,  concerning  their  common 
peace  and  preservation ;  if  any  shall  mutiny  and  rise  up  against 
their  commanders  and  officers;  if  any  should  preach  or  write 
that  there  ought  to  be  no  commanders  or  officers,  nor  correc- 
tions nor  punishments,  no  laws  nor  orders,  I  never  denied,  but 
in  such  cases,  whatever  is  pretended,  the  commander  or  com- 
manders may  judge,  resist,  compel  and  punish  such  transgres- 
sors, according  to  their  deserts  and  merits." 

Another  passage  is  equally  well  known: 

"The  Church  or  company  of  worshippers  (whether  true  or 
false)  is  like  unto  a  Body  of  Colledge  of  Physitians  in  a  Citie; 
like  unto  a  Corporation,  Society,  or  company  of  East-Indie  or 
Turkie  Merchands,  or  any  other  Societie  or  Company  in  Lon- 
don: which  Companies  may  hold  their  Courts,  keep  their 
Records,  hold  disputations;  and  in  matters  concerning  their 
societie,  may  dissent,  divide,  break  into  Schismes  and  Factions, 


10  RHODE  ISLAND  HISTORICAL  SOCIETY 

sue  and  implead  each  other  at  the  Laws,  yea  wholly  break  up 
and  dissolve  into  pieces  and  nothing,  and  yet  the  peace  of  the 
Citie  not  be  in  the  least  measure  impaired  or  disturbed;  because 
the  essence  or  being  of  the  Citie,  and  so  the  well-being  and 
peace  thereof  is  essentially  distinct  from  those  particular 
Societies;  the  Citie-Courts,  Citie-Lawes,  Citie-punishments 
distinct  from  theirs.  The  Citie  was  before  them,  and  stands 
absolute  and  intire,  when  such  a  Corporation  or  Society  is  taken 
down." 

The  passages  already  quoted  deal  with  the  separation  of 
state  and  church  in  practice.  In  theory,  maintained  Wil- 
liams, the  two  were  also  separate,  and  for  the  good  reason 
that  their  aims  were  different.  The  magistrate  tended  the 
bodies  of  men ;  the  minister  to  their  souls.  And  hence  a  state 
church,  or  a  church-state,  was  a  confusion. 

"For  as  it  would  be  confusion  for  the  church  to  censure  such 
[civil]  matters,  and  so  such  persons  as  belong  to  the  church: 
So  it  is  confusion  for  the  state  to  punish  spirituall  offenders, 
for  they  are  not  within  the  sphear  of  a  civil  jurisdiction.  The 
body  or  Commonweal  is  meerly  civil,  the  Magistrate  or  head 
is  a  civil  head,  and  each  member  is  a  civil  member:  and  so  far 
forth  as  any  of  this  civil  body  are  spiritual,  or  act  spiritually, 
they  and  their  actions  fall  under  a  spiritual  cognizance  and 
judicature." 

I  shall  not  elaborate  further  on  the  theme  j  but  I  only 
want  to  mention  again  that  these  lines  were  written  nearly 
three  centuries  ago,  when  loyalty  to  state  presupposed 
loyalty  to  church,  and  when  it  was  implicitly  believed  by 
almost  every  one  that  civil  government  was  impossible  un- 
less there  be  religious  uniformity.  The  Thirty  Years  War 
was  still  raging  when  the  Bloudy  Tenent  appeared.  Its 
ideas  at  the  time  were  visionary,  fantastic,  incendiary:  the 
English  Parliament  ordered  the  book  burned.  But,  here  in 
Rhode  Island,  in  Providence,  on  Aquidneck,  and  later  at 
Warwick,  Soul  Liberty  was  tried.  It  worked — and  after  all, 
the  only  test  of  any  idea  is  the  pragmatic  one.  As  Mr.  Justice 
Holmes  remarked  upon  a  memorable  occasion,  "The  best 
test  of  truth  is  the  power  of  the  thought  to  get  itself  ac- 
cepted in  the  competition  of  the  market." 


roger  Williams' contribution  11 

In  Rhode  Island,  the  first  instance  of  religious  liberty  in 
action  is  to  be  found  in  Providence  Compact,  by  which  the 
inhabitants  bound  themselves  "Only  in  civill  things."  And, 
on  Aquidneck,  in  1641,  it  was  ordered  "that  none  be 
accounted  a  delinquent  for  Doctrine."  The  first,  or  Provi- 
dence Plantations,  charter,  could  say  nothing  about  con- 
science, as  the  Parliament  that  granted  it  was  hostile  to 
Toleration,  but  the  first  laws  enacted  under  that  charter,  the 
Code  of  1 647,  left  no  doubts  in  the  matter.  The  main  body 
of  laws  concludes  with  words  whose  simple  impressiveness 
even  today  cannot  fail  to  awe. 

"These  are  the  Lawes  that  concern  all  men,  and  these  are  the 
Penalties  for  the  transgression  thereof,  which  by  common  con- 
sent are  Ratified  and  Established  throwout  this  whole  Colonic: 
And  otherwise  than  that  what  is  forbidden,  all  men  may  walk 
as  their  conscience  perswade  them,  every  man  in  the  name  of 
his  God." 

Here,  expressed  in  the  quiet  poetry  of  seventeenth  cen- 
tury prose,  was  the  "Rhode  Island  Idea,"  which  before  long 
was  confirmed  in  the  provisions  of  the  charter  of  1663.  In 
that  instrument  it  was  expressly  declared,  in  words  that 
might  have  been,  and  perhaps  were,  written  by  Roger  Wil- 
liams himself, 

"that  no  person  within  the  said  Colony  *  *  *  shall  be  in  any 
wise  molested,  punished,  disquieted,  or  called  in  question  for 
any  differences  in  opinion  in  matters  of  religion,  that  do  not 
actually  disturbe  the  civil  peace,  but  that  all  and  every  person 
and  persons  may  *  *  *  freely  and  fully  have  and  enjoy  his 
and  their  own  judgments  and  consciences,  in  matters  of  reli- 
gious concernments,  *  *  *  they  behaving  themselves  peace- 
ably and  quietly,  and  not  using  this  liberty  to  licentiousness  and 
profaneness  nor  to  the  civil  injury  or  outward  disturbance  of 
others  *  *  *  " 

And  that  charter  contained  also  those  glorious,  sonorous 
words  which  have  been  carried  into  our  Constitution  and 
now  are  graven  over  the  portico  of  our  State  House,  there  to 
look  down  upon  and  counsel  the  generations  yet  to  come: 

"To  hold  forth  a  lively  experiment,  that  a  most  flourishing 


12  RHODE  ISLAND  HISTORICAL  SOCIETY 

civil  state  may  stand  and  best  be  maintained  with  full  liberty  in 
religious  concernments." 

And  now  we  are  ready  to  consider  Roger  Williams'  polit- 
ical views.  These  have  been  too  long  ignored,  partly  because 
a  certain  school  of  history  saw  in  every  mention  of  Williams' 
political  opinions  the  sly  and  subtle  machinations  of  the 
Massachusetts  j  and  partly  also,  no  doubt,  because  Roger 
Williams  by  and  large  is  heavy  reading,  and  the  thought  of 
digging  through  "The  Bloudy  Tenent",  to  name  no  others, 
was  not  encouraging.  But  of  late  years  we  have  had  testi- 
mony, from  unbiased  and  wholly  disinterested  sources,  con- 
cerning the  political  wisdom  of  Roger  Williams  and  his 
place  among  political  thinkers.  One  Dr.  Jellinek  successful- 
ly maintained  the  thesis  that  it  was  Roger  Williams,  not 
Voltaire  or  the  other  eighteenth  century  philosophers,  who 
was  the  author  of  the  Rights  of  Man,  and  hence  the  spiritual 
father  of  the  French  Revolution.  A  Dr.  Freund,  but  a  few 
years  since,  asserted  most  convincingly  that  Williams  was 
the  foremost  exponent  of  liberty  of  conscience  and  the  rights 
of  man  in  the  English  Revolution.  Even  more  recently,  Dr. 
James  E.  Ernst  published  his  comprehensive  work  on  Wil- 
liams' political  thought ;  and  j  ust  the  other  day,  in  the  latest 
number  of  the  Rhode  Island  Historical  Collections,  Dr. 
Ernst  has  traced  the  tremendous  influence  of  Williams' 
"Bloudy  Tenent"  on  the  pamphleteers  of  the  English 
Revolution,  and  hence  on  that  great  political  movement 
itself. 

I  suppose  that  the  keystone  of  Roger  Williams'  political 
arch  was  the  idea  that  the  state  exists  for  man,  and  not  man 
for  the  state.  As  a  corollary  to  this  fundamental  thought, 
Williams  maintained  that  the  people  were  sovereign.  They 
were  the  state.  In  Williams'  own  words: 

"Whereas  they  say,  that  the  Civill  Power  may  erect  and 
establish  what  forme  of  civill  Government  may  seem  in 
Wisdome  most  meet,  I  acknowledge  the  Proposition  to  be  most 
true.  *  *  *  But  from  this  Grant  I  infer,  (as  before  hath  been 
touched)  that  the  Sovereign,  original,  and  foundation  of  Civill 
power  lies  in  the  People,  (whom  thev  must  needs  mean  bv  the 


ROGER  WILLIAMS'  CONTRIBUTION  13 

civill  power  distinct  from  the  Government  set  up.)  And  if  so, 
that  a  People  may  erect  and  establish  what  forme  of  Govern- 
ment seemes  to  them  most  meete  for  their  civill  condition:  It 
is  evident  that  such  Governments  as  are  by  them  erected  and 
established,  have  no  more  power,  nor  for  no  longer  time,  then 
the  civill  power  or  people  consenting  and  agreeing  shall  betrust 
them  with.  This  is  cleere  not  only  in  Reason,  but  in  the  experi- 
ence of  all  commonweales,  where  the  people  are  not  deprived 
of  their  naturall  freedom  by  the  power  of  the  tyrants." 

These  were  not  idle  speculations ;  they  were  ideas  that 
had  already  been  put  into  practice.  The  General  Court  for 
Portsmouth  and  Newport  in  1641  declared  its  institutions 
"a  Democracie  or  Popular  Government" ;  and  even  earlier, 
in  1637,  the  Providence  settlers  had  signed  a  solemn  com- 
pact "to  subject  ourselves,  in  active  or  passive  obedience,  to 
all  such  orders  or  agreements  as  shall  be  made  for  public 
good  of  the  body,  in  an  orderly  way,  by  the  major  assent  of 
the  present-Inhabitants  *  *  *  and  others  whome  they  shall 
admitt  unto  them." 

It  is  one  of  the  glories  of  Roger  Williams'  political  ideas 
that  they  were  the  product,  not  of  a  cloistered  scholar  mus- 
ing in  his  cell,  but  of  an  intensely  active  man,  who  carried 
out  his  thoughts  in  practice,  and  successfully  subjected  them 
to  the  acid  test  of  actual  experience. 

Williams  was  careful  always  to  point  out  that  the  powers 
of  the  State  extended  only  to  civil  things,  but  those  proper 
functions  he  did  not  limit  in  any  narrow  doctrinaire  fashion. 
His  views  approached  closely  some  which  have  been  formu- 
lated only  in  the  last  decade  or  so,  and  which  conceive  the 
state  to  be  nothing  more  than  a  species  of  public  service  cor- 
poration, simply  more  magnificent  and  larger  in  scope  than 
most.  An  unromantic  thought,  if  you  will,  but  one  which 
flows  naturally  and  easily  from  Roger  Williams'  primary 
conception  that  the  state  is  made  for  man.  This  idea,  as  Dr. 
Ernst  points  out, 

"is  resident  in  such  terms  as:  *  *  *  common  safety,  common 
welfare,  *  *  *  public  good,  preservation  of  peace  and  order, 
common  peace  and  subsistence,  common  peace  and  liberty, 
*   *   *   and  minister  and  servant.  In  his  letter  to  Providence, 


14  RHODE    ISLAND    HISTORICAL    SOCIETY 

in  1651,  [  Roger  Williams]  emphasizes  the  public  service  in 
settlement  of  controversies,  care  of  orphans,  widows,  the  poor 
and  the  insane;  in  a  letter,  in  1667,  he  encourages  the  building 
of  roads  and  bridges.  At  other  times,  he  requests  the  regulation 
of  trade,  commerce,  industry,  the  liquor  traffic  with  the  Indians 
and  the  citizens,  and  the  protection  of  cattle  from  wild  beasts." 

At  a  time  when  some  people  are  urging,  for  various  ends, 
that  the  functions  of  government  be  limited,  arguing  in 
reliance  on  supposed  inherent  principles  which  turn  out  to 
be  imaginary  over-simplifications  of  half-understood  doc- 
trine, it  is  refreshing  to  turn  to  Roger  Williams,  to  note  his 
solutions,  and  to  observe  that  his  theories  were  sufficiently 
broad  to  allow  the  state  to  serve  all  public  needs.  Doubtless 
Williams  would  heartily  concur  with  the  penetrating  ob- 
servations of  a  recent  writer:  "Government  is  itself  an  art, 
one  of  the  subtlest  of  the  arts.  It  is  neither  business,  nor 
technology,  nor  applied  science.  It  is  the  art  of  making  men 
live  together  in  peace  and  with  reasonable  happiness." 

Some  other  ideas  of  Roger  Williams  I  have  but  time  to 
hint  at:  his  views  on  the  distribution  of  local  and  central 
authority,  on  the  necessity  of  fluidity  in  government,  on  the 
relation  of  states  to  each  other,  on  liberty.  It  is  interesting  to 
note  in  passing  that  he  anticipated  James  Otis  by  nearly  a 
century.  In  1680  he  wrote  to  the  citizens  of  Providence: 
"There  is  no  man  that  hath  a  vote  in  town  or  colony,  but 
he  hath  a  hand  in  making  the  rates  by  himself  or  his  depu- 
ties." It  is  even  more  interesting  to  observe  that  in  this  same 
letter,  written  when  he  could  look  upon  the  world  with  the 
placid  wisdom  of  age,  Williams  stressed  the  necessity  of 
government  not  as  an  evil  to  be  tolerated,  but  as  an  institu- 
tion affirmatively  good,  because  it  emanated  from  the 
people. 

"Government  and  order  in  families,  towns,  etc.,  is  the  ordi- 
nance of  the  Most  High,  Rom.  13,  for  the  peace  and  good  of 
mankind.  *  *  *  Mankind  cannot  keep  together  without  some 
government.  *  *  *  That  there  is  no  man  in  the  world,  except 
robbers,  pirates  and  rebels  but  doth  submit  to  government.  Even 
robbers,  pirates  and  rebels  themselves  cannot  hold  together,  but 
by  some  law  among  themselves  and  government.  One  of  these 


ROGER  WILLIAMS'  CONTRIBUTION  15 

two  great  laws  of  the  world  must  prevail,  either  that  of  judges 
and  justices  of  peace  in  courts  of  peace,  or  law  of  arms,  the 
sword  and  blood.  *  *  *  Till  matters  come  to  a  settled  govern- 
ment, no  man  is  ordinarily  sure  of  his  house,  goods,  lands,  cattle, 
wife,  children,  life." 

And  with  a  pardonable  show  of  pride  he  added,  "our 
Charter  excels  all  in  New  England  as  to  the  Souls  of  men." 

Rhode  Island  enjoyed,  he  asserted,  "such  Peace,  such 
Security,  such  Liberties  of  Soule  and  Body  as  were  never 
enjoyed  by  any  English  men,  nor  any  in  the  World  I  have 
heard  of." 

And  yet  his  very  successes  were  charged  against  him  as 
faults j  in  1650  he  wrote,  "I  have  been  charged  with  folly 
for  that  freedom  and  libertie  which  I  have  always  stood 
forj  I  say  liberty  and  equalitie  both  in  land  and  govern- 
ment." Furthermore,  Roger  Williams  has  been  charged 
with  sundry  inconsistencies.  You  remember  the  case  of 
Joshua  Verin,  who  kept  his  wife  from  attending  Williams' 
religious  services.  This  was  a  breach  of  the  rule  guarantee- 
ing liberty  of  conscience,  and  Verin  was  accordingly  dis- 
franchised. But,  maintained  the  miller,  "when  he  consented 
to  that  order  he  never  intended  it  should  extend  to  the 
breach  of  any  ordinance  of  God,  such  as  the  subjection  of 
wives  to  their  husbands";  at  any  rate,  Verin  asserted  he  had 
acted  "out  of  conscience."  Hence  it  was  said  that  Williams 
was  inconsistent.  Further,  Roger  Williams  had  charged 
William  Harris  with  treason  for  writing  against  the  Rhode 
Island  charter  j  yet  Williams  himself  had  written  against 
the  Massachusetts  charter.  And  finally,  despite  his  espousals 
of  religious  liberty,  he  had  inveighed  against  the  Quakers, 
and  had  threatened  them  with  imprisonment  for  their  use 
of  "thee"  and  "thou"  and  for  their  refusal  to  uncover. 

As  to  the  Harris  incident,  it  need  only  be  remarked  that 
there  are  charters  of  all  sorts,  and  that  the  one  granted 
Rhode  Island  had  not  the  faults  which  Williams  earlier 
exposed  in  Massachusetts.  It  did  not  disregard  the  Indians' 
rights.  The  other  two  events,  it  seems  to  me,  do  not  invali- 
date the  principle  at  all,  or  smack  of  inconsistency.  (The 


16  RHODE  ISLAND  HISTORICAL  SOCIETY 

virtue  of  consistency,  I  take  it,  is  the  proof  it  affords  that  a 
man  believes  in  the  worth  of  an  idea,  and  does  not  twist  it 
to  serve  his  changing  ends. )  They  illustrate  simply  a  diffi- 
culty inherent  in  human  affairs,  the  difficulty  of  drawing  a 
line.  "Otherwise  than  in  such  cases  as  did  disturb  the  civil 
pease," — and  obviously  there  can  be  different  opinions 
about  what  cases  are  disturbing.  That  Williams  drew  the 
line  differently  than  we  should  perhaps  draw  it  today,  I 
can  attribute  only  to  the  fact  that  he,  like  all  of  us,  was  only 
human.  And,  to  quote  an  acute  critic,  "If  we  focus  attention 
on  the  human  origin  of  all  government,  we  shall  have  a 
more  scientific  temper  for  dealing  with  its  frailties."  Much 
the  same  is  the  biblical  thought:  "We  have  this  treasure  in 
earthen  vessels." 

So  I  do  not  believe  that  the  incident  of  the  Quakers  is  the 
blot  on  Williams'  name  that  some  have  contended  it  was. 
Quite  to  the  contrary,  I  think  there  is  something  remarkable 
and  admirable  in  Roger  Williams'  conduct:  with  one  breath 
he  bids  the  Quakers  welcome,  sheltering  them  from  the 
persecution  and  death  that  was  their  lot  elsewhere ;  with  the 
next  breath  he  argues  against  their  doctrines  until  he  is 
hoarse.  It  seems  to  me  that  he  personifies  Voltaire's  words 
in  the  following  century:  "I  wholly  disagree  with  what  you 
say,  and  will  defend  to  the  death  your  right  to  say  it! " 

Is  it  any  wonder  that  such  a  man  was  not  understood  by 
his  time,  that  he  represented  something  irrational,  that  he 
was  called  an  incendiary,  one  with  windmills  in  his  head? 
And  after  all,  some  of  his  ideas  have  not  even  yet  met  with 
more  than  partial  approval.  Here  is  a  passage  from  the 
Bloudy  Tenent: 

"It  is  a  truth,  the  mischief  of  a  hlinde  Pharises  blinde 
guidance  is  greater  then  if  he  acted  Treasons,  Murders,  &c.  and 
the  losse  of  one  soule  by  his  seduction  is  a  greater  mischief  then 
if  he  blew  up  Parliaments,  and  cuts  the  throats  of  Kings  or 
Kmperours,  so  pretious  is  that  invaluable  Jewell  of  a  Soul,  above 
all  the  present  lives  and  bodies  of  all  the  men  in  the  world!" 

These  words  were  written  while  Charles  the  First  still  had 


ROGER  WILLIAMS'  CONTRIBUTION  17 

his  head.  I  beg  you  compare  them  with  a  sentence  published 
within  the  year,  from  Harold  Laski's  book: 

"Liberty  [writes  Mr.  Laski]  cannot  help  being  a  courage  to 
resist  the  demands  of  power  at  some  point  that  is  decisive ;  and, 
because  of  this,  liberty,  also,  is  an  inescapable  doctrine  of  con- 
tingent anarchy." 

The  parallelism  is  striking,  and  not  less  striking  is  the  fact 
that  the  latter  writer,  also,  was  in  effect  "enlarged"  out  of 
Massachusetts. 

After  all,  the  case  of  Roger  Williams  is  but  another  illus- 
tration of  the  difficulty  of  adjusting  the  fundamental  rela- 
tion between  man  and  society,  between  the  individual  and 
the  group.  On  the  one  hand  there  is  the  feeling  of  the  herd, 
instinctive  and  hence  deep-rooted,  that  will  not  tolerate 
deviations  from  the  herd  norm.  At  the  other  extreme  is  the 
desire  of  the  individual  to  assert  himself,  to  live  his  own 
life  and  to  think  his  own  thoughts.  Between  these  two  con- 
ceptions of  life  there  is  a  chasm  that  cannot  be  bridged;  the 
difference  is  irreconcilable.  It  is  the  struggle  between  heart 
and  head;  it  is  the  conflict  between  conformity  and  non- 
conformity, between  concurrence  and  dissent.  And  so  long 
as  in  each  human  being  reason  is  blended  with  emotion, 
who  shall  say  which  is  right? 

President  Faunce,  in  the  ripeness  of  his  wisdom,  would 
often  admonish  us  to  "conform  in  little  things."  But  what 
of  large  things,  what  of  ideas  that  move  the  thinkers?  Each 
must  decide  that  for  himself.  It  is  not  enough,  I  fear,  to 
suggest  that  they  be  not  uttered,  to  echo  the  remark  of  the 
medieval  judge,  that  "the  devil  himself  knoweth  not  the 
thought  of  man,"  or  to  urge,  as  did  Walter  Pater,  that  a 
civilized  man  carries  his  ideas  lightly.  For  when  we  come  to 
grips  with  this  insoluble  problem  of  conformity  or  dissent, 
we  deal  with  men  who  do  not  toy  with  ideas,  who  cannot 
equivocate  and  who  will  not  be  silenced,  who  like  Martin 
Luther  before  the  Diet  cry  out,  "Ich  kann  nlcht  anders" — 
I  can  not  do  otherwise — and  who,  like  Roger  Williams,  will 
cheerfully  grapple  with  privation  and  bravely  look  into  the 


18  RHODE    ISLAND    HISTORICAL    SOCIETY 

face  of  death.  And  yet — and  yet — but  few  dissenters  have 
the  stature  of  a  Luther  or  a  Williams. 

Judge  Learned  Hand  has  put  the  matter  very  well: 

"And  so,  poor  wights,  we  cling  to  what  custom  gives,  and 
insist  upon  the  verity  of  what  we  tremble  to  uncover  and  forbid 
others  to  dispute.  The  heretic  who  dares  to  lay  impious  hand 
upon  our  arks  has  always  been  our  enemy,  and  perhaps  will  be 
till  the  last  syllable  of  recorded  time.  Too  often  reckless,  vain, 
and  shallow,  strutting  in  the  glare  of  the  fires  he  kindles;  care- 
less, so  he  throw  large  the  shadow  of  his  puny  self.  Yet  not  always; 
his  kind  are  also  man's  best  friends,  without  whom  life  would 
be  as  dead  as  a  pressed  fiower,  yellow  and  crushed  and  scentless. 
Such,  when  they  are  true  to  the  faith,  put  their  trust  in  life, 
in  man's  assertion  of  his  right  to  be,  in  that  old  Adam  who,  from 
the  first  flicker  of  sentience  and  in  the  midst  of  the  appalling 
tragedy  of  existence,  has  striven  to  endure,  and  in  spite  of  all 
still  goes  on.  Man's  upward  course  from  the  first  amoeba  which 
felt  a  conscious  thrill,  is  no  more  than  the  effort  to  affirm  the 
meanings  of  his  own  strange  self,  to  divine  his  significance  and 
to  make  it  manifest  in  the  little  hour  vouchsafed  him." 

But  it  does  not  follow  that  the  noisy,  shallow  critics  must 
then  be  silenced.  For  who  are  we  to  judge  the  worth  of  what 
is  said,  and  by  what  token  are  we  to  differentiate  the  Norton 
of  Merry  Mount  from  the  Roger  Williams r  Far  better  to 
let  them  be,  to  let  time  judge;  the  first  can  never  harm  us, 
and  the  other,  who  should  not  be  forced  to  seek  elsewhere, 
will  always  redound  to  our  credit.  Even  Massachusetts  later 
had  need  of  Williams,  within  his  lifetime,  and  on  numerous 
occasions  he  served  and  even  saved  the  state  that  had  ex- 
pelled him. 

The  noisy  reveler,  the  carping  and  dyspeptic  critic,  these 
but  condemn  themselves;  well  has  it  been  said  that  "the 
fitting  remedy  for  evil  counsels  is  good  ones."  In  the  words 
of  Thomas  Jefferson,  "We  have  nothing  to  fear  from  the 
demoralizing  reasonings  of  some,  if  others  are  left  free  to 
demonstrate  their  errors  and  especially  when  the  law  stands 
ready  to  punish  the  first  criminal  act  produced  by  false 
reasonings." 


ROGER  WILLIAMS'  CONTRIBUTION  19 

When  the  United  Colonies  in  1656  asked  the  Colony  of 
the  Providence  Plantations  to  cease  admitting  Quakers, 
President  Benedict  Arnold  and  the  magistrates  replied, 
"that  in  those  places  where  these  people  aforesaid  in  this 
Colony,  are  most  of  all  suffered  to  declare  themselves 
freely,  and  are  only  opposed  by  arguments  in  discourse, 
there  they  least  of  all  desire  to  come,  and  we  are  informed 
that  they  begin  to  loathe  this  place,  for  that  they  are  not 
opposed  by  the  civil  authority:  and  we  surely  find  that  they 
delight  to  be  persecuted  by  civil  powers,  and  when  they  are 
so  they  are  like  to  gain  more  adherents  by  the  conceit  of 
their  patient  sufferings." 

As  persecution  glorifies  the  oppressed,  whether  these  be 
good  or  bad,  so  does  it  humble  the  persecutor.  Who  now 
remembers  the  Parliamentarians  who  burned  The  Bloudy 
Tenentt  Who  now  can  name  the  man  who  governed  Massa- 
chusetts when  that  Colony  banished  Roger  Williams?  (It 
was  not  Winthrop. )  His  name  is  as  the  dust,  but  that  of 
Williams  lives.  And  yet  the  sentence  of  banishment  still 
stands  unrepealed,  touched  neither  by  the  judgment  of  the 
world,  nor  by  that  decent  gratitude  which  should  have  been 
the  modest  recompense  for  Williams'  later  services. 

"The  men  whom  I  should  be  tempted  to  commemorate," 
says  Mr.  Justice  Holmes,  "would  be  the  originators  of 
transforming  thought."  Tonight,  as  we  celebrate  Roger 
Williams,  I  trust  it  will  not  seem  unduly  didactic  if  we 
attempt  to  extract  a  lesson  from  his  example.  I  suggest  that 
it  is  the  futility  of  suppressing  those  who  "hath  broached  & 
dyvulged  dyvers  newe  and  dangerous  opinions" ;  and 
though  perhaps  that  is  not  a  popular  notion,  it  will  doubt- 
less have  more  adherents  in  the  next  few  years.  For  I  ven- 
ture to  predict  that  we  are  at  the  threshold  of  a  more  tol- 
erant decade,  that  we  will  respect  more  than  heretofore  the 
right  of  others  to  differ  from  us,  and  that  we  may  perhaps 
even  practice  the  precept  of  the  great  man  whom  tonight 
we  praise.  It  is  true,  conditions  are  different.  Where  once 


20  RHODE  ISLAND  HISTORICAL  SOCIETY 

religious  heresies  were  abhorred,  it  is  now  economic  aberra- 
tions. But  the  principle  is  still  the  same;  and  indeed,  the 
need  of  it  is  greater.  When  Roger  Williams  was  hunted  by 
Archbishop  Laud,  he  could  come  to  America;  when  the 
theocracy  expelled  him,  he  wandered  to  Seekonk;  when 
Governor  Winslow  bade  him  leave,  he  came  to  Providence. 
But  where  can  the  soul  go  that  is  now  troubled  for  con- 
science? There  are  no  more  vacant  lands;  there  is  nowhere 
now  to  go. 

It  is  not  love  of  the  past  alone  that  suggests  we  maintain 
the  tradition  of  Roger  Williams,  nor  is  it  solely  antiquarian- 
ism  that  applauds  the  thoughts  and  doctrines  of  one  so 
essentially  modern,  who  saw  the  need  for  government  and 
order,  and  at  the  same  time  recognized  the  necessity  for 
self-expression.  Here  in  the  State  of  Rhode  Island  and 
Providence  Plantations  we  can  do  much  worse  than  follow 
in  the  footsteps  of  our  Founder;  and  if  we  do  follow  him, 
and  so  long  as  we  do,  we  shall  always,  I  trust,  "hold  forth  a 
lively  experiment." 


CHEESE  MAKING  21 


Cheese  Making  in  Old  South  County 
By  Albert  E.  Lownes 

Two  hundred 'years  ago  South  County  was  an  area  of 
great  plantations.  The  soil,  for  the  most  part,  was  too  rocky 
or  too  sandy  for  efficient  cultivation,  but  the  raising  of  live 
stock  of  all  kinds  flourished. 

The  growing  of  neat  cattle  naturally  produced  a  surplus 
of  milk,  particularly  during  the  summer  months,  and  since 
the  perishable  nature  of  the  product  made  shipment  impos- 
sible under  the  conditions  that  then  prevailed,  it  was  not 
long  before  the  settlers  began  to  convert  it  into  cheese.  By 
the  middle  of  the  eighteenth  century  unbelievable  quan- 
tities were  made  and  exported,  not  only  to  the  neighboring 
colonies,  but  to  all  parts  of  British  America  and  to  Europe, 
as  well. 

James  McSparran,  the  beloved  rector  of  St.  Paul's  in 
Narragansett,  writes  in  his  America  Dissected:  "The  prod- 
uce of  this  colony  (  Rhode  Island)  is  principally  butter  and 
cheese,  fat  cattle,  wool,  and  fine  horses,  that  are  exported  to 
all  parts  of  the  English  America." 

Douglass,  in  1760,  says:  "Rhode  Island  Colony  in  gen- 
eral, is  a  country  pasture,  not  for  grain.  ...  It  is  noted  for 
dairies,  whence  the  best  cheese  made  in  any  part  of  New 
England,  is  called  (abroad)  Rhode  Island  cheese.  The 
most  considerable  farms  are  in  the  Narragansett  country. 
Their  highest  dairy  of  one  farm  .  .  .  milks  about  one  hun- 
dred and  ten  cows,  cuts  two  hundred  loads  of  hay,  makes 
about  thirteen  thousand  pounds  of  cheese,  besides  butter, 
and  sells  off  considerable  in  calves  and  fatted  bullocks.  A 
farmer  from  seventy-three  milch  cows  in  five  months  made 
ten  thousand  pounds  of  cheese." 

These  may  well  have  been  the  greatest  producers,  but 
others  were  not  far  behind.  Updike,  on  the  authority  of 
Isaac  Peace  Hazard,  states  that  "N.  Hazard  kept  42  cows 


22  RHODE  ISLAND  HISTORICAL  SOCIETY 

and  made  9,200  pounds  of  cheese"  and  that  "Joseph  N. 
Austin  .  . .  kept  36  cows  and  made  8,000  pounds  of  cheese." 
Rowland  Robinson  is  also  cited  as  having  "an  immense 
dairy"  and  we  are  told  that  "one  cow  would  average  two 
pounds  of  cheese  a  day." 

In  addition  to  these  great  dairymen,  there  were  many 
others  who  made  cheese  on  a  large,  though  more  modest, 
scale.  "College  Tom"  Hazard,  whose  records  have  been  so 
carefully  preserved  for  us  by  Miss  Caroline  Hazard,  regu- 
larly sold  over  two  thousand  pounds  of  cheese  a  year  and  in 
some  years  almost  doubled  that  figure. 

Naturally,  an  industry  of  this  magnitude  had  its  effect  on 
the  general  trade  of  the  Colony, — especially  since  currency 
seems  to  have  been  one  of  the  least  stable  of  the  commodi- 
ties. We  learn  from  Updike  that  rents  were  paid  in  produce 
and  that  "6000  pounds  of  cheese  was  equivalent  to  $600 
annual  rent  for  years." 

Updike  tells  us  that  "the  wife  of  Richard  Smith  brought 
from  Gloustershire  to  this  country,  the  recipe  for  making 
the  celebrated  Cheshire  cheese,  and  from  this  recipe  the 
Narragansett  was  made  in  imitation  of  the  Cheshire  cheese, 
and  it  early  gained  for  the  table  and  market  an  established 
reputation  for  superior  flavor  and  excellence."  This  must 
have  been  the  wife  of  the  first  settler  in  Narragansett,  who 
came  from  that  county. 

It  seems  hardly  possible  that  cheese-making  was  possible 
at  such  an  early  date,  but  by  the  middle  of  the  following 
century  it  was  certainly  well  established  and  cheese  con- 
tinued to  be  a  principal  product  of  the  Narragansett  Coun- 
try until  after  the  Napoleonic  Wars.  Then  butter  increased 
in  price  while  cheese  declined,  so  that  it  became  more  profi- 
table to  use  the  cream  for  butter.  Attempts  were  made  to 
produce  cheeses  from  skimmed  milk,  but  they  were  of 
inferior  quality  and  the  industry  languished  and  died  early 
in  the  nineteenth  century. 

Cheese-making  is  a  comparatively  simple  process.  It  was 
apparently,  in  the  early  days  at  least,  done  principally  by 


CHEESE  MAKING  23 

the  female  slaves  and  we  learn  that  Robert  Hazard, 
father  of  "College  Tom,"  "had  twelve  negro  women  as 
dairy  women,  each  of  whom  had  a  girl  to  assist  her,  making 
from  twelve  to  twenty-four  cheeses  a  day." 

Directions  and  recipes  for  making  cheese  exist  in  many 
books  of  the  period.  They  differ  greatly  in  minor  particu- 
lars but  the  general  principle  is  the  same. 

The  milk  was  set  in  pans  and  a  little  rennet  was  added  to 
it — "just  enough  to  make  the  curd  come,"  to  quote  an  old 
recipe.  It  was  kept  at  blood  heat  until  the  curd  was  well 
formed — usually  about  half  an  hour.  The  curd  was  stirred 
with  the  hand  until  it  was  well  set.  It  was  then  removed 
from  the  whey  with  a  strainer  and  placed  on  a  draining 
board.  It  was  worked  with  the  hands  to  remove  as  much  of 
the  whey  as  possible.  Sometimes  this  operation  was  per- 
formed in  a  cheesecloth  laid  over  a  cheese-basket,  which 
rested  in  turn  on  a  cheese-ladder,  placed  over  a  pan  or  tub 
to  catch  the  whey.  More  rarely  a  cheese-rack  combined  the 
functions  of  basket  and  ladder.  After  as  much  liquid  as  pos- 
sible was  removed  from  the  curds  by  hand,  they  were  salted 
and  packed  into  a  cheese-ring  or  hoop  and  placed  in  the 
press.  A  wooden  disk,  called  the  foller,  fitted  snugly  on  top 
of  the  curds  to  ensure  even  pressing.  The  hoop  or  ring  had 
no  bottom,  but  a  similar  device,  called  a  vat,  had  a  per- 
forated wooden  bottom.  Isaac  Peace  Hazard  recalled  that 
his  great-grandfather,  Robert  Hazard,  had  "cheese-vats 
of  the  second  size"  that  "held  nearly  one  bushel." 

The  cheese  presses  were  of  many  sizes  and  types,  from 
small  table  presses  to  great  floor  presses  as  tall  as  a  man.  All 
that  I  have  seen  of  undoubted  Rhode  Island  lineage  made 
one  cheese  at  a  time,  but  at  a  later  date  multiple  presses 
were  developed.  South  County  Museum  has  four  presses, 
all  different,  and  two  others  are  in  the  writer's  possession. 
Pressure  was  applied,  in  most  cases,  through  a  combination 
of  pulleys  and  levers.  A  weight  was  attached  to  the  end  of 
the  lever  to  give  a  constant  pressure.  One  press,  a  small 
table  press,  is  operated  with  wooden  screws. 


24  RHODE  ISLAND  HISTORICAL  SOCIETY 

The  cheese  was  pressed  over  night  with  moderate  pres- 
sure. Then  it  was  turned  over  and  pressed  on  the  other  side. 
It  was  removed  from  the  hoop  and  thoroughly  coated  with 
butter  and  salt  and  placed  on  a  cheese-ladder  on  the  cheese- 
house  shelf  to  ripen.  This  took  several  months  and  during 
this  period  the  cheese  had  to  be  turned  over  and  buttered 
daily.  Most  of  the  cheese  was  made  during  July  and 
August,  but  the  turning  and  buttering  continued  until  late 
in  the  fall. 

Most  of  the  cheese  made  in  Rhode  Island  was  "natural 
cheese,"  but  some  fancy  cheeses  were  made  by  adding  herbs 
or  herb-teas  to  the  curds  to  give  color  and  flavor.  Sage  was 
most  popular,  but  teas  made  by  boiling  young  corn-husks  or 
spinach  gave  a  fine  green  color. 

South  County  Museum  has  all  of  the  equipment  for 
making  this  famous  cheese — the  pails  and  pans  and  rings 
and  follers,  the  vats  and  baskets  and  ladders,  as  well  as  the 
presses  themselves.  Unfortunately,  good  Mistress  Smith's 
recipe  is  lost,  but  even  if  it  were  not  it  is  doubtful  if  we 
could  compete  with  the  highly  mechanized  factories  of 
New  York  and  Wisconsin. 


COCUMCUSSOC  25 


Cocumcussoc 

The  following  explanation  of  the  meaning  of  the  Indian 
word  Cocumcussoc  is  contained  in  an  extract  from  a  letter 
from  Mr.  W.  B.  Cabot*  of  Boston  to  Mr.  J.  Earl  Clauson 
of  Wickford,  which  appeared  in  the  Evening  Bulletin  of 
October  3,  1934.  Mr.  Cabot  wrote: 

"Agreeing  with  you,  I  have  never  liked  Trumbull's  con- 
necting Cocumcusset  with  Devil's  Foot.  'A  grass  marsh,' 
meaning  seems  the  one  to  me;  more  exactly,  two  succeed- 
ing marshes,  possibly  more  than  two.  The  form  appears  in 
Cocumpaug,  a  pond  in  Charlestown,  but  applied  to  ponds 
instead  of  marshes. 

"As  a  matter  of  notation  I  think  Trumbull's  accepting 
'cocum'  for  'kikum'  is  unjustified  as  the  sounds  represented 
don't  seem  to  approach  each  other  in  their  dialects." 


Notes 

Mrs.  Herbert  W.  Rice  has  been  elected  to  membership 
in  the  Society. 


*See  R.  I.  H.  S.  Collections  for  April,  1929,  for  Cabot's  explanation 
of  the  meaning  of  other  local  Indian  place  names.. 


26  RHODE    ISLAND    HISTORICAL    SOCIETY 


New  Publications  of  Rhode  Island  Interest 

An  Article  by  Canon  A.  A.  Luce  entitled  Berkeley's 
Bermuda  Project  and  His  Benefactions  to  American  Uni- 
versities, with  Unpublished  Letters  and  Extracts  from  the 
Egmont  Papers  appears  in  the  August,  1934,  issue  of  the 
Proceedings  of  the  Royal  Irish  Academy. 

History  and  Trees  of  the  Jenks  Family  by  Charles  N. 
Jenks  is  a  41  page  pamphlet. 

An  article*  by  Coe  Hayne,  entitled  The  Long  Trail  of 
the  Br  other  towns  traces  the  descent  of  Hannah  Garret,  wife 
of  David  Fowler,  "the  Mercury  of  the  Indian  School"  from 
Momojashuck,  brother  of  Ninigret,  thus  connecting  the 
Narragansett-Niantics  with  the  Brothertown  Indians  of 
Wisconsin. 


*R.  I.  H.  S.  Scrap  Hook  Vol.  31,  p.  69. 


LIST  OF  MEMBERS 


27 


List  of  Active  Members  of  the  Rhode  Island 
Historical  Society. 

December  31,  1934. 


Mr.  David  C  Adelman 

Mr.  Frederick  W.  Aldred 

Mr.  Edward  K.  Aldrich,  Jr.      K 

Miss  Lucy  T.  Aldrich 

Hon.  Richard  S.  Aldrich 

Mr.  Stuart  M.  Aldrich 

Mr.  Philip  Allen 

Miss  Ada  Almy 

Mr.  Walter  F.  Angell 

Mrs.  Everard  Appleton 

Miss  Marguerite  Appleton 

Mr.  Arthur  H.  Armington 

Miss  Maude  E.  Armstrong 

Mrs.  Edward  E.  Arnold 

Mr.  Frederick  W.  Arnold 

Miss  Mittie  Arnold 

Mr.  James  H.  Arthur 

Mr.  Donald  S.  Babcock 

Mr.  J.  Earle  Bacon 

Mr.  Albert  A.  Baker 

Mrs.  Charles  K.  Baker 

Mr.  Harvey  A.  Baker 

Mr.  J.  Willard  Baker 

Miss  Mary  H.  Balch 

Rev.  Clarence  A.  Barbour,  D.D. 

Mrs.  Sarah  Minchin  Barker 

Miss  Sarah  Dyer  Barnes 

Miss  Hattie  B.  Barns 

Mr.  Fred  H.  Barrows 

Mr.  Earl  G.  Batty 

Mrs.  Daniel  Beckwith 

Mrs.  Herbert  G.  Beede 

Mr.  Horace  G.  Belcher 

Mr.  Horatio  E.  Bellows 

Mr.  Bruce  M.  Bigelow 

Mr.  George  E.  Bixby 

Mr.  Zenas  W.  Bliss  ' 


Mrs.  Edward  W.  Blodgett 
G.  Alder  Blumer,  M.D. 
Mr.  J.  J.  Bodell 
Mrs.  Theodore  P.  Bogert 
Mr.  Richard  LeB.  Bowen 
Rev.  Arthur  H.  Bradford 
Mr.  Claude  R.  Branch 
Rabbi  William  G.  Braude 
Miss  Alice  Brayton 
Miss  Elizabeth  H.  Brayton 
Miss  Ida  F.  Bridgham 
Mr.  William  E.  Brigham 
Mrs.  William  E.  Brigham 
Miss  Eva  St.  C.  Brightman 
Mrs.  Clarence  A.  Brouwer 
Mr.  Clarence  Irving  Brown 
Mr.  Cyrus  P.  Brown 
Mr.  Frank  Hail  Brown 
Mrs.  Frank  Hail  Brown 
Miss  Isabel  R.  Brown 
Mr.  John  Nicholas  Brown 
Madelaine  R.  Brown,  M.D. 
Mr.  Wilbur  D.  Brown 
Mr.  Alfred  S.  Brownell 
Capt.  Ernest  H.  Brownell 
Mr.  Harris  H.  Bucklin 
Miss  Clara  BufFum 
Mr.  Edward  J.  C.  Bullock 
Mrs.  Edward  J.  C.  Bullock 
Rev.  Paul  E.  Burhoe 
Mr.  Edwin  A.  Burlingame 
Mr.  Raymond  Buss 
Mr.  Alfred  T.  Butler 
Miss  Irene  B.  Butler 
Mr.  G.  Edward  Buxton 
Mrs.  S.  H.  Cabot 
Mrs.  Edwin  A.  Cady 


28 


RHODE    ISLAND    HISTORICAL    SOCIETY 


Mr.  John  H.  Cady 
Mrs.  Charles  A.  Calder 
Frank  T.  Calcf,  M.D. 
Mr.  Herbert  C.  Calef 
Mrs.  Walter  R.  Callender 
Mrs.  Wallace  Campbell 
Mr.  Emilio  N.  Cappelli 
Mr.  Thomas  B.  Card 
Mrs.  George  W.  Carr 
Mrs.  Marion  P.  Carter 
Miss  Anna  H.  Chace 
Mr.  Malcolm  G.  Chace 
Mr.  Henry  S.  Chafee 
Mrs.  Everitte  S.  Chaffee 
Prof.  Robert  F.  Chambers 
Mr.  Arthur  D.  Champlin 
Mr.  George  B.  Champlin 
Miss  Anna  Chapin 
Charles  V.  Chapin,  M.D. 
Mrs.  Charles  V.  Chapin 
Mr.  Howard  M.  Chapin 
Mrs.  Howard  M.  Chapin 
Mr.  William  P.  Chapin 
Mr.  Frederic  L.  Chase 
Julian  A.  Chase,  M.D. 
Edmund  D.  Chesebro,  M.D. 
Mr.  Albert  W.  Clafiin 
Mrs.  Edward  S.  Clark 
Mr.  Prescott  O.  Clarke 
Mr.  J.  Earl  Clauson 
Mr.  Eugene  A.  Clauss 
Prof.  Theodore  Collier 
Mrs.  Clarkson  A.  Collins,  Jr. 
Mr.  James  C.  Collins 
Mr.  Edward  L.  Coman 
Mr.  Jonathan  F.  Comstock 
Mrs.  Mabel  B.  Comstock 
Mrs.  W.  A.  H.  Comstock 
Mr.  Walter  J.  Comstock 
Mr.  William  P.  Comstock 
Mr.  Charles  D.  Cook 
Mrs.  Charles  D.  Cook 
Mr.  Albert  B.  Coulters 
Prof.  Verner  W.  Crane 
Mr.  Frank  H.  Cranston 


George  H.  Crooker,  M.D. 

Mr.  Harry  Parsons  Cross 

Frank  Anthony  Cummings,  M.D. 

Mrs.  Frank  Anthony  Cummings 

Mr.  Arthur  Cushing 

Mrs.  George  A.  Dame 

Prof.  S.  Foster  Damon 

Murray  S.  Danforth,  M.D. 

Mrs.  Murray  S.  Danforth 

Mr.  William  C.  Dart 

Mr.  Foster  B.  Davis 

Miss  Mary  Elliott  Davis 

Mrs.  R.  C.  Davis 

Mr.  Charles  J.  Davol 

Prof.  Edmund  B.  Delabarre 

Mr.  Paul  C.  DeWolf 

Miss  Alice  S.  Dexter 

Miss  Eunice  W.  Dexter 

Mr.  Henry  C.  Dexter 

Mr.  Walter  Frederick  Dickinson 

Miss  Louise  Diman 

Mrs.  Harriet  M.  F.  Dixon 

John  E.  Donley,  M.D. 

Mr.  Michael  F.  Dooley 

Mr.  Louis  W.  Downes 

Mrs.  Louis  W.  Downes 

Mrs.  George  E.  Downing 

Mr.  Robert  T.  Downs 

Mr.  David  Duncan 

Mr.  Henry  A.  DuVillard 

Miss  Margarethe  L.  Dwight 

Miss  Anna  Jones  Dyer 

Mr.  H.  Anthony  Dyer 

Mr.  William  Allan  Dyer 

Mr.  Charles  G.  Easton 

Mr.  Frederick  W.  Easton 

Mr.  Alfred  U.  Eddy 

Mr.  Cyrus  T.  Eddy 

Miss  Isabel  Eddy 

Mr.  William  Holden  Eddy 

Miss  Harriet  C.  Edmonds 

Miss  Edith  Edwards 

Mrs.  Seeber  Edwards 

Mr.  Walter  Angell  Edwards 

Mr.  James  Elgar 


LIST  OF  MEMBERS 


29 


Mr.  Zenas  H.  Ellis 

Mr.  William  Ely 

Mr.  Frank  W.  Emerson 

Mr.  Robert  S.  Emerson 

Mr.  Ralph  C.  Estes 

Mr.  William  Wood  Estes 

Mrs.  William  Wood  Estes 

Mr.  Charles  Owen  Ethier 

Mr.  Royal  Bailey  Farnum 

Mr.  Walter  F.  Farrell 

Mr.  Augustus  H.  Fiske 

Mrs.  Charles  Fletcher 

Mr.  Elliot  Flint 

Mrs.  Lawrence  B.  Fogarty 

Mr.  Allan  Forbes 

Mrs.  George  H.  Fowler 

Mr.  Hovey  T.  Freeman 

Mrs.  John  R.  Freeman 

Mr.  Joseph  W.  Freeman 

Hon.  G.  Frederick  Frost 

Mr.  Frederick  H."  Fuller 

Mr.  R.  Clinton  Fuller 

Frank  T.  Fulton,  M.D. 

Mme.  Annita  Gaburri 

Hon.  Joseph  H.  Gainer 

Mrs.  Robert  Ives  Gammell 

Mr.  William  Gammell 

Mr.  William  Gammell,  Jr. 

Miss  Abbie  P.  Gardner 

George  W.  Gardner,  M.D. 

Prof.  Henry  B.  Gardner 

Mrs.  John  T.  Gardner 

Mr.  Preston  H.  Gardner 

Mr.  Daniel  F.  George 

Mrs.  Louis  C.  Gerry 

Hon.  Peter  G.  Gerry 

Mrs.  Peter  G.  Gerry 

Mrs.  Alice  C.  Gleeson 

Mr.  Robert  H.  I.  Goddard 

Rabbi  Israel  M.  Goldman 

Mr.  George  T.  Gorton 

Mr.  Harry  Hale  Goss 

Mrs.  Richard  Rathborne  Graham 

Mrs.  A.  L.  Grant 

Mr.  Eugene  S.  Graves 


Mrs.  Eugene  S.  Graves 

Miss  Eleanor  B.  Green 

Gov.  Theodore  Francis  Green 

Mr.  Edward  Aborn  Greene 

Mrs.  Joseph  Warren  Greene,  Jr. 

Mr.  Thomas  C.  Greene 

Mr.  Ralph  M.  Greenlaw 

Mr.  William  B.  Greenough 

Mr.  Russell  Grinnell 

Mr.  E.  Tudor  Gross 

Mrs.  Harold  J.  Gross 

Mr.  R.  F.  Haffenreffer 

Hon.  J.  Jerome  Hahn 

Mr.  John  W.  Haley 

Miss  Annette  Mason  Ham 

Mrs.  Livingston  Ham 

Mrs.  Albert  G.  Harkness 

Mr.  Gilbert  A.  Harrington 

Mr.  Benjamin  P.  Harris 

Miss  Mary  A.  Harris 

Mr.  Stephen  C.  Harris 

Mr.  Everett  S.  Hartwell 

N.  Darrell  Harvey,  M.D. 

Mr.  William  A.  Hathaway 

Miss  Caroline  Hazard 

Mr.  Thomas  G.  Hazard,  Jr. 

Mr.  Charles  F.  Heartman 

Mrs.  W.  E.  Heathcote 

Prof.  James  B.  Hedges 

Mr.  Bernon  E.  Helme 

Mr.  John  Henshaw 

Mr.  Joseph  G.  Henshaw 

Mr.  Robert  W.  Herrick 

Mr.  G.  Burton  Hibbert 

Mr.  William  A.  Hill 

Mr.  Frank  L.  Hinckley 

Mr.  William  L.  Hodgman 

Mrs.  William  H.  Hoffman 

Mrs.  John  S.  Holbrook 

Mr.  George  J.  Holden 

Mrs.  John  W.  Holton 

Mr.  Charles  A.  Horton 

Mr.  M.  A.  DeWolfe  Howe 

Mr.  Wallis  E.  Howe 


30 


RHODE  ISLAND  HISTORICAL  SOCIETY 


Mrs.  Richard  G.  Howland 
Mrs.  William  Erwin  Hoy 
Mrs.  George  H.  Huddy,  Jr. 
Mr.  Sidney  D.  Humphrey 
Mr.  Horatio  A.  Hunt 
Mr.  S.  Foster  Hunt 
Mrs.  Duncan  Hunter 
Mr.  George  Hurley 
Mr.  Richard  A.  Hurley 
Mr.  James  Hazen  Hyde 
Mrs.  C.  Oliver  Iselin 
Mr.  Norman  M.  Isham 
Miss  Mary  A.  Jack 
Mr.  Benjamin  A.  Jackson 
Mrs.  Donald  E.  Jackson 
Mr.  Thomas  A.  Jenckes 
Mrs.  Edward  L.  Johnson 
Mr.  William  C.  Johnson 
Dr.  Lewis  H.  Kalloch 
Mr.  Francis  B.  Keeney 
Mr.  Charles  A.  Keller 
Mrs.  Ellsworth  L.  Kelley 
Mr.  Howard  R.  Kent 
Mr.  Charles  H.  Keyes 
Mr.  H.  Earle  Kimball 
Mrs.  Eugene  P.  King 
Lucius  C.  Kingman,  M.D. 
Mr.  C.  Prescott  Knight,  Jr. 
Mr.  Robert  L.  Knight 
Mrs.  Robert  L.  Knight 
Mr.  Russell  W.  Knight 
Prof.  Harry  L.  Koopman 
Mr.  John  Krawczuk 
Mrs.  Henry  S.  Lanpher 
Mrs.  Dana  Lawrence 
Mr.  George  R.  Lawton 
Charles  H.  Leonard,  M.D. 
Miss  Grace  F.  Leonard 
Mrs.  Austin  T.  Levy 
Mr.  Dexter  L.  Lewis 
Mr.  Joseph  W.  Lewis 
Mr.  Ferdinand  A.  Lincoln 
Mrs.  Charles  Warren  Lippitt 
Mr.  Charles  Warren  Lippitt 
Mrs.  Frances  Pomeroy  Lippitt 


Mr.  Gorton  T.  Lippitt 
Mr.  Arthur  B.  Lisle 
Mrs.  Arthur  B.  Lisle 
Mr.  Alden  L.  Littlefield 
Mrs.  Alden  L.  Littlefield 
Mr.  Charles  W.  Littlefield 
Mr.  Ivory  Littlefield 
Rev.  Augustus  M.  Lord,  D.D. 
Mr.  T.  Robley  Louttit 
Mr.  W.  Easton  Louttit,  Jr. 
Mr.  David  B.  Lovell,  Jr. 
Mr.  Albert  E.  Lownes 
Mr.  Harold  C.  Lyman 
Mr.  Richard  E.  Lyman 
Mr.  William  A.  McAuslan 
Mrs.  William  A.  McAuslan 
Mr.  Kenneth  D.  MacColl 
Mr.  Norman  A.  MacColl 
Mr.  William  B.  MacColl 
Mr.  Arthur  M.  McCrillis 
Miss  Grace  E.  Macdonald 
Mr.  Benjamin  M.  MacDougall 
Mr.  Charles  B.  Mackinney 
Mrs.  Herbert  E.  Maine 
Mrs.  Benjamin  B.  Manchester 
Mrs.  William  L.  Manchester 
Mr.  Charles  C.  Marshall 
Mr.  Edgar  W.  Martin 
Mrs.  John  F.  Marvel 
Mr.  Harold  Mason 
Mr.  John  H.  Mason 
Mrs.  William  B.  Mason 
Mrs.  George  S.  Mathews 
Mr.  Archibald  C.  Matteson 
Mr.  William  L.  Mauran 
Mrs.  William  L.  Mauran 
Mrs.  Frank  Everitt  Maxwell 
Mr.  Harry  V.  Mayo 
Rev.  Charles  A.  Meader 
Mr.  W.  Granville  Meader 
■  Mrs.  Charles  H.  Merriman 
Mrs.  E.  Bruce  Merriman 
Mr.  Harold  T.  Merriman 
Mr.  I.  B.  Merriman 
Mrs.  I.  B.  Merriman 


LIST  OF   MEMBERS 


31 


Mrs.  E.  T.  H.  Metcalf 

Mr.  G.  Pierce  Metcalf 

Mr.  Houghton  P.  Metcalf 

Mrs.  I.  Harris  Metcalf 

Hon.  Jesse  H.  Metcalf 

Mrs.  Jesse  H.  Metcalf 

Mr.  Stephen  O.  Metcalf 

Mr.  William  Davis  Miller 

Mrs.  William  Davis  Miller 

Mr.  George  L.  Miner 

Mr.  G.  A.  Moriarty,  Jr.  ' 

Mrs.  William  Robert  Morrison 

Mrs.  Bentley  W.  Morse 

Prof.  Jarvis  M.  Morse 

Mr.  Edward  S.  Moulton 

Mrs.  Edward  S.  Moulton 

William  M.  Muncy,  M.D. 

Walter  L.  Munro,  M.D. 

Mr.  Addison  P.  Munroe 

Mrs.  Addison  P.  Munroe 

Mr.  Walter  M.  Murdie 

Mrs.  James  A.  Nealey 

Mr.  George  P.  Newell 

Mr.  Louis  C.  Newman 

Mrs.  Louis  C.  Newman 

Miss  Eliza  Taft  Newton 

Mr.  Roger  Hale  Newton 

Mr.  Paul  C.  Nicholson 

Mr.  Samuel  M.  Nicholson 

Mr.  Elmer  D.  Nickerson 

Ira  Hart  Noyes,  M.D. 

Miss  Mary  Olcott 

Mrs.  Frank  F.  Olney 

Mr.  Harald  W.  Ostby 

Mr.  G.  Richmond  Parsons 

Mrs.  G.  Richmond  Parsons 

Miss  Mary  H.  Parsons 

Mr.  Frederick  S.  Peck 

Mrs.  Frederick  S.  Peck 

Mr.  Horace  M.  Peck 

Mr.  Stephen  I.  Peck 

Mr.  William  H.  Peck 

Mr.  William  T.  Peck 

Mrs.  F.  H.  Peckham 

Katherine  F.  Peckham,  M.D. 


Mr.  Augustus  R.  Peirce 

Mr.  Clarence  E.  Peirce 

Mr.  John  P.  B.  Peirce 

Mr.  Charles  M.  Perry 

Mr.  Howard  B.  Perry 

Rt.  Rev.  James  DeWolf  Perry,  D.D. 

Mr.  Marsden  J.  Perry 

John  M.  Peters,  M.D. 

Mr.  Arthur  L.  Philbrick 

Mr.  Charles  H.  Philbrick 

Mr.  Arthur  S.  Phillips 

Mrs.  Frank  N.  Phillips 

Mr.  Emil  G.  Pieper 

Mr.  Byron  A.  Pierce 

Mr.  Thomas  L.  Pierce 

Mr.  Albert  H.  Poland 

Prof.  Albert  K.  Potter 

Dr.  Arthur  M.  Potter 

Mr.  B.  Thomas  Potter 

Mrs.  Dexter  B.  Potter 

Mrs.  T.  I.  Hare  Powel 

Mr.  Howard  W.  Preston 

Mrs.  Howard  W.  Preston 

Mr.  Robert  S.  Preston 

Miss  Evelyn  M.  Purdy 

Helen  C.  Putnam,  M.D. 

Mr.  Patrick  H.  Quinn 

Mrs.  George  R.  Ramsbottom 

Mr.  Walter  E.  Ranger 

Mrs.  C.  K.  Rathbone 

Hon.  Elmer  J.  Rathbun 

Mrs.  Irving  E.  Raymond 

Mr.  Charles  C.  Remington 

Rhode  Island  State  College 

Mr.  Dana  Rice 

Mr.  Herbert  W.  Rice 

Gen.  John  J.  Richards 

Miss  Louise  Richardson 

Mr.  Henry  Isaac  Richmond 

Mrs.  George  W.  H.  Ritchie 

Mr.  Louis  E.  Robinson 

Mr.  Robert  Rodman 

Rev.  Arthur  Rogers 

Mr.  Kenneth  Shaw  Safe 

Mrs.  Harold  P.  Salisbury 


32 


RHODE  ISLAND  HISTORICAL  SOCIETY 


Mr.  Henry  Salomon 
Mrs.  G.  Coburn  Sanctuary 
Mrs.  George  C.  Scott 
Mrs.  David  S.  Seaman 
Mr.  Henry  M.  Sessions 
Miss  Ellen  D.  Sharpe 
Mr.  Henry  D.  Sharpe 
Eliot  A.  Shaw,  M.D. 
Mrs.  Frederick  E.  Shaw- 
Mrs.  George  St.  J.  Sheffield 
Mr.  Charles  Shepard 
Mr.  Clarence  E.  Sherman 
Mr.  Harry  B.  Sherman 
Mrs.  Arthur  F.  Short 
Mrs.  Philip  B.  Simonds 
Mrs.  Charles  Sisson 
Mrs.  Byron  N.  H.  Smith 
Mrs.  Charles  H.  Smith 
Edgar  B.  Smith,  M.D. 
Mrs.  Edwin  C.  Smith 
Joseph  Smith,  M.D. 
Mr.  Nathaniel  W.  Smith 
R.  Morton  Smith,  M.D. 
Mr.  Walter  B.  Smith 
Mr.  Ward  E.  Smith 
Mr.  Sylvester  M.  Snow 
Mr.  William  A.  Spicer 
Hon.  Ernest  L.  Sprague 
Mrs.  James  G.  Staton 
Hon.  Charles  F.  Stearns 
Mr.  Thomas  E.  Steere 
Mr.  Oscar  Frank  Stetson 
Miss  Maud  Lyman  Stevens 
Mr.  Edward  Clinton  Stiness 
Mr.  Henry  Y.  Stites 
Mr.  Charles  C.  Stover 
Mrs.  Charles  C.  Stover 
Mr.  Charles  T.  Straight 
Mr.  H.  Nelson  Street 
Mr.  Henry  A.  Street 
Mr.  Rush  Sturges 
Hon.  Arthur  P.  Sumner 
Mr.  Frank  H.  Swan 
Hon.  John  W.  Sweeney 
Miss  Louisa  A.  Sweetland 


Mr.  Royal  C.  Taft 

Prof.  Will  S.  Taylor 

Benjamin  F.  Tefft,  M.D. 

Mrs.  J.  P.  Thorndike 

Louisa  Paine  Tingley,  M.D. 

Mr.  F.  L.  Titsworth 

Mrs.  William  O.  Todd 

Mrs.  Stacy  Tolman 

Mr.  Frederick  E.  Tripp 

Mr.  William  J.  Tully 

Mrs.  Albert  C.  Tyler 

Mr.  D.  Berkeley  Updike 

Mr.  William  H.  Vanderbilt 

Mr.  William  A.  Viall 

Mrs.  Arthur  M.  Walker 

Mr.  A.  Tingley  Wall 

Mrs.  Maurice  K.  Washburn 

Mrs.  Lewis  A.  Waterman 

Prof.  Arthur  E.  Watson 

Mr.  Byron  S.  Watson 

Mr.  John  J.  Watson 

Mr.  W.  L.  Watson 

Mrs.  William  B.  Weeden 

Mr.  Richard  Ward  Greene  Welling 

Mr.  John  H.  Wells 

Mr.  Edward  H.  West 

Mr.  Thomas  H.  West,  Jr. 

Mrs.  Elizabeth  Nicholson  White 

Mr.  Willis  H.  White 

Mrs.  Henry  A.  Whitmarsh 

Mr.  Frederick  Bernays  Wiener 

Mr.  Frank  J.  Wilder' 

Mrs.  Elizabeth  K.  Wilkinson 

Mr.  Daniel  L.  Willmarth,  Jr. 

Miss  Amey  L.  Wilson 

Mr.  William  A.  Wing 

Mr.  Wilson  G.  Wing 

Mrs.  George  P.  Winship 

Mrs.  C.  Howard  Wood 

Rev.  William  Worthington 

Mr.  Carlos  G.  Wright 

Mr.  Nathan  M.  Wright 

Mr.  Lawrence  C.  Wroth 

Mr.  Frederick  W.  York 


Form  of  Legacy 

"/  give  and  bequeath  to  the  Rhode  Island 
Historical  Society  the  sum  of 
dollars. " 


Rogj  k  Williams  Press  ^1^ 


E.  A.  Johnson  Co. 


providence 


Rhode    Island 

Historical    Society 

Collections 


,*q»rm 


£* 


«3 


Vol.  XXVIII 


APRIL,  1935/       -  ^No.  2 


THE    HOYLE    TAVERN 

From  a  daguerreotype  taken  in  18  57  by  G.  L.  Hurd. 

See  page  33.  Photograph  on  file  in  the  Society's  Library. 


Issued  Quarterly 


68  Waterman  Street,  Providence,  Rhode  Island 


CONTENTS 


PAGE 

The  Old  Hoyle  Tavern 

bv  Horace  G.  Belcher  .  .  .  Cover  and  33 


Alleged  Runic  Inscriptions  in  Rhode  Island 

by  Edmund  B.  Delabarre     ....  49 

New  Publications  of  Rhode  Island  Interest    .  .  57 

Notes 5  8 

Gabriel  Bernon's  House 

drawing  by  Z.  Allen     .....  59 

Treasurer's  Report     ......  60 


RHODE 


HISTORICAL 


ISLAND 


SOCIETY 


COLLECTIONS 


Vol.  XXVIII 


APRIL,  1935 


No.  2 


H.  Anthony  Dyer,  President         Gilbert  A.  Harrington,  Treasurer 
Howard  W.  Preston,  Secretary  Howard  M.  Chapin,  Librarian 


The  Society  assumes  no  responsibility  for  the  statements  or  the  opinions 
of  contributors.  


-  The  Old  Hoyle  Tavern 

By  Horace  G.  Belcher 

Few  localities  in  Rhode  Island  have  been  better  known  to 
greater  numbers  over  a  long  period  of  years  than  the  V- 
shaped  junction  of  Westminster  and  Cranston  streets,  now 
named  Canonicus  square  but  still  termed  Hoyle  square  by 
many.  For  this  was  the  site  during  seven  generations,  of  the 
famous  old  Hoyle  Tavern,  one  of  the  first  taverns  opened 
on  the  West  side  of  Providence  and  for  nearly  a  century  and 
a  half  one  of  the  best  known  places  of  resort  in  or  near  the 
old  town  founded  by  Roger  Williams. 

Located  at  the  junction  of  the  highway  to  Moshantituck 

later  the  Cranston  road  and  now  Cranston  street — and 

that  leading  to  Newtaconsonutt,  long  known  as  High  street 
and  now  called  Westminster,  two  great  tides  of  travel 
passed  its  doors  and  united  in  front  of  it,  to  flow  into  the 
town  by  its  main  highway.  One  came  from  Connecticut 
through  the  Western  farming  and  manufacturing  towns 
of   Rhode    Island — down   the    New   London   Turnpike, 


34  RHODE  ISLAND  HISTORICAL  SOCIETY 

through  Coventry  and  Cranston;  the  other  from  the  Plain- 
held,  Hartford  and  Norwich  Turnpikes,  flowing  through 
Olneyville  from  the  Northern  and  Northwestern  towns — 
Burrillville,  North  Smithheld,  Smithfield,  Glocester,  Sci- 
tuate,  Foster,  Johnston — a  section  of  farms  and  small,  often 
isolated  mills,  much  of  it  far  more  densely  populated  a 
century  ago,  than  now. 

Down  these  roads  came  great  teams  hauling  raw  materi- 
als and  finished  products  from  the  small  mills  whose  stone 
skeletons  may  yet  be  seen  along  many  streams  whose  remote 
situations  did  not  weigh  against  the  water  power  they  fur- 
nished; drovers  with  herds  of  cattle;  farmers  with  loads 
of  produce  for  barter  in  the  town ;  stage  coaches  with  trav- 
ellers eager  to  stretch  their  legs  and  get  something  to  wash 
down  the  dust  in  their  throats  before  the  last  long  stretch  of 
road  into  Providence. 

These  coaches  came  from  Connecticut  towns  and  Rhode 
Island  villages;  from  Hartford,  through  Scituate;  Hart- 
ford, via  Pomfret;  Norwich  via  South  Scituate;  Danielson 
and  North  Scituate;  Cranston;  Clayville  via  Simmonsville; 
Hartford  and  Norwich  via  Scituate  Four  Corners;  Cran- 
ston; Olneyville.  They  passed  at  all  hours  on  every  day 
save  Sunday,  those  to  the  most  remote  points  reaching  the 
Hoyle  outward  bound  in  the  early  morning  of  every  other 
day,  inward  bound  in  late  afternoon  or  early  evening.  The 
Olneyville  stage  ran  daily,  every  hour  from  Providence.1 

It  was  a  never  ending  stream  of  travel,  passing  on  both 
sides  of  the  old  tavern  as  it  stood  inside  the  point  of  the  V 
looking  toward  the  town  at  the  junction  of  the  two  main 
roads,  on  the  very  site  where  stands  today  the  building  of 
the  Citizens  Savings  Bank. 

Year  after  year  the  old  tavern  stood  there,  until  a  century 
passed  and  half  of  another;  until  it  became  the  best  known 
tavern  of  the  town,  a  landmark  and  directing  point.  To  say 
"It's  near  the  Hoyle"  was  to  identify  the  location  of  any 
point  instantly,  to  all  save  the  stranger  here.    Even  today, 

1  Providence  Directory,  1850,  1855-56. 


THE  OLD  HOYLE  TAVERN  35 

years  after  the  name  of  the  open  space  in  front  of  the  bank 
was  officially  changed  by  the  city,  it  is  generally  known  by 
its  old  name  of  Hoyle  Square,  or  to  older  residents  as  "The 
Hoyle." 

Yet  although  the  Hoyle  Tavern  was  carried  on  by  vari- 
ous proprietors  nearly  a  century  and  a  half  before  the  old 
hostelry  was  removed  to  make  way  for  a  business  block 
which  in  turn  was  replaced  by  the  modern  bank  building 
now  standing  on  the  site,  the  tavern  which  to  the  end  bore 
his  name  was  in  charge  of  a  Hoyle  but  1 3  years.  The  name 
remained  on  the  sign  and  the  impress  of  his  identity  on  the 
place,  although  he  served  his  last  flip  there  in  1 796  and  was 
not  even  the  first  to  open  the  tavern.  Nor  was  this  the  first 
Hoyle  Tavern  in  the  town,  although  the  earlier  one  is 
now  almost  forgotten  and  its  name  and  location  is  uncertain. 

The  legend  on  a  picture  of  the  house  which  for  years 
hung  in  the  old  sitting  room  of  the  tavern,  gave  the  date  of 
opening  as  1724."  The  date  most  generally  accepted  for 
many  years  was  1 782  3  and  the  tavern  was  said  to  have  been 
named  after  the  man  who  built  and  opened  it  and  who  also 
had  a  Hoyle  Tavern,  less  well  known,  out  in  Triptown,  the 
present  Manton.4 

But  Col.  Joseph  Hoyle,  whose  name  remained  on  the 
sign  to  the  end,  did  not  become  owner  of  the  house  until 
1783" — and  a  tavern  had  been  carried  on  there  for  many 
years  previous  to  his  purchase  of  the  place.  Moreover,  there 
had  been  a  Hoyle  Tavern  in  Providence  for  years  before 
any  buildings  were  erected  at  the  intersecting  roadways  to 
the  hill  towns  of  Rhode  Island  and  the  Connecticut  hill 
country  beyond. 

The  first  mention  of  a  Hoyle  as  a  tavern  keeper  is  on  the 

2  History  of  Providence  County,  Edited  by  Richard  M.  Bayles,  Prov- 
idence, 1891. 

3  Ibid.,  and  manuscript  account  of  Old  Providence  Taverns,  by  Dr. 
Franklin  C.  Clark,  now  (1933)  in  possession  of  Howard  W.  Preston. 

4  History  of  Providence  County,  Bayles. 

5  Deed  Book  20,  Section  2,  page  723,  Providence  Land  Records. 


36  RHODE  ISLAND  HISTORICAL  SOCIETY 

sixth  of  July,  1  728,  when  in  the  entry  of  the  Town  Council 
meeting  of  that  date  "Doctr  Hoyl"  is  listed  among  the  1 2 
appearing  "to  take  Licence."  He  paid  2  shillings,  1 0  pence." 

Dr.  John  Hoyle,  first  of  several  of  this  name,  is  men- 
tioned by  Staples  in  his  "Annals  of  Providence"  as  "one  of 
the  most  active  and  efficient  of  the  number"  that  composed 
the  society  organizing  what  now  is  the  First  Congregational 
(Unitarian)  Church.  He  must  have  been  a  man  of  firm 
convictions  and  positive  action,  for  in  1721,  during  a  con- 
troversy over  the  proper  location  for  the  new  church  edifice, 
he  visited  neighboring  colonies  to  solicit  financial  aid  and 
after  raising  money  in  Connecticut  and  Massachusetts,  on 
his  return  began  erecting  the  church  near  the  junction  of  the 
present  Broad  and  Westminster  Streets.' 

He  did  this  without  consulting  others,  after  buying  the 
land.  "So  great  was  the  dissatisfaction  at  the  conduct  of 
Dr.  Hoyle",  says  Staples,  "that  the  house  was  torn  down 
after  it  had  been  partially  finished,  and  tradition  says,  in 
the  night  time." 

Dr.  Hoyle  was  born  in  Bury,  in  Lancaster,  England, 
April  4,  1685s  and  was  buried  in  the  graveyard  he  estab- 
lished on  his  own  land,  February  11,  1766.  The  Hoyle 
burial  plot  was  at  what  now  is  the  corner  of  Broad  and 
Moore  Streets,  still  an  empty  lot  growing  up  to  brush.9  This 
plot  was  in  Cranston  until  the  extension  of  the  Providence 
city  line  in  1  868. 

In  his  will  Dr.  Hoyle  left  1  5  pounds  to  the  town  of 
Cranston  for  care  of  this  burial  plot,  but  the  trust  was  not 
executed  and  the  condition  of  the  lot  finally  became  so 
neglected  that  two  of  his  descendants  had  the  bodies  re- 
moved to  Locust  Grove  Cemetery  on  Elmwood  Avenue." 
The  gravestones  with  the  exception  of  two  large  ones  that 

6 Early  Records  of  the  Town  of  Providence,  refrint,  Vol.  12,  page  87, 
Providence,  1897 

7  Annals  of  Providence,  by  William  R.  Staples,  Providence,  18+3. 

8 R.  I.  Historical  Society  Collections,  Vol.  25,  page  112,  October, 
1932. 

"Mrs.  George  W.  Carr,  direct  descendant  of  Dr.  John  Hoyle. 


38  RHODE  ISLAND  HISTORICAL  SOCIETY 

stood  just  beside  the  tomb,  were  replaced  in  the  new  ceme- 
tery. The  two  larger  stones,  one  of  them  headed  with  the 
name  of  Dr.  John  Hoyle,  were  given  to  the  Rhode  Island 
Historical  Society  and  placed  in  the  society's  exhibits. 

The  land  originally  purchased  by  Dr.  Hoyle  for  church 
purposes  was  roughly  centered  by  what  now  is  Fenner 
Street.  Late  in  the  Eighteenth  Century  the  family  home 
was  near  the  corner  of  the  present  Westminster  and  Bridg- 
ham  Streets.1"  The  name  has  been  perpetuated  in  Hoyle 
Street  as  well  as  in  memories  of  the  old  Hoyle  Tavern.  The 
family  is  all  but  extinct,  the  last  survivor  being  Mrs.  George 
W.  Carr,  widow  of  one  of  the  best  known  Providence  phy- 
sicians of  another  generation. 

In  the  records  of  a  Town  Council  meeting  held  July  14, 
1729,  mainly  for  the  granting  of  licenses,  is  this  entry: 
" — it  is  voated  that  those  that  will  haue  Licence  shall  Giue 
after  the  same  Rate  that  they  Gaue  the  last  yeare  and  that 
John  Hoyle  is  accepted  in  the  Roome  of  fiernot  Packard 
and  John  Randall  Jn  in  the  Roome  of  Edward  Potter  & 
accepted  2-x-O-O."  John  Hoyle  paid  that  day  2-10-0.11 

August  3,  1730,  the  Council  granted  14  licenses,  includ- 
ing one  to  John  Hoyle,  the  record  reading:  "Mr.  John 
Hoyle  hath  payd  2-10-0."" 

Again  two  years  later,  he  appears.  The  Council  met 
August  14,  1732  mainly  for  the  granting  of  licenses  and  the 
entry  reads:  "John  Hoyle  is  to  haue  a  Licence  for  the  sum 
of  50  shillings:  in  a  reasonable  time."13  His  tavern  must 
have  been  on  the  "Towne  Row,"  now  North  and  South 
Main  Streets,  one  of  the  most  desirable  locations,  for  he  and 
William  Hopkins  were  the  only  ones  to  pay  2  pounds  10 
shillings  fee.  The  other  six  paid  two  pounds  only. 

Next  year  he  met  opposition.  August  1  8,  1  733,  at  a  meet- 
ing "mainly  to  Grant  Licences  and  Licence  Tavern  keep- 

10  Ibid. 

11  Earl 'v  Records  of  the  Town  of  Providence,  refrint,  Vol.  1  2,  page  88. 
1  -I hid. ,  page  90.' 

13 Ibid.,  page  93. 


THE  OLD  HOYLE  TAVERN  39 

ers,"  the  record  says:  "John  Hoyle  appeared  to  take  Licence 
and  was  Rejected  by  a  voate  of  the  Councill." " 

This  was  six  years  before  the  first  license  was  granted  at 
what  we  know  as  the  Hoyle  Tavern  and  more  than  half  a 
century  before  Col.  Joseph  Hoyle  bought  the  already  sus- 
cessful  inn  to  which  he  gave  his  name. 

This  John  Hoyle  of  Cranston  was  his  grandfather.  The 
interruption  of  the  license  must  have  been  merely  tem- 
porary, for  in  his  will,  rhade  April  16,  1758  and  recorded 
February  6,  1  766,  five  days  before  his  burial,  John  Hoyle 
"of  Cranston"  directs  his  son  James,  father  of  Joseph,  to 
"asist  his  mother  in  her  business,  her  paying  him  for  it." 
He  divided  his  lands  in  Cranston  and  his  house  in  Provi- 
dence among  his  widow  and  three  children,  left  sums  of 
money  to  grand-children  as  well  as  1 5  pounds  to  "the  town 
of  Cranston  treasury"  to  maintain  his  Hoyle  graveyard  and 
continued:     - 

"And  further  my  will  is  that  children  should  be  loving 
each  other  and  to  their  mother  and  she  the  same  to  them 
and  I  would  pray  that  they  would  think  that  their  poor 
Mother  and  Father  had  no  body  to  give  any  thing  to  them 
and  that  I  have  labored  hard  to  get  a  few  pence  for  them 
and  hope  God  will  bless  them  with  the  same." 

The  "few  pence"  proved  a  sizable  fortune  for  the  times. 
His  estate  inventoried  2887  pounds,  10  shillings,  old  tenor 
and  included  a  silver  mounted  sword  and  "cain,"  articles 
proving  him  to  have  been  a  man  of  position  as  well  as  sub- 
stance.1'' 

From  such  sturdy  stock  as  this,  came  the  tavern  keeper 
so  long  remembered  at  the  junction  of  the  two  main  roads 
into  Northern  and  Western  Rhode  Island. 

The  present  site  of  the  Citizens  Savings  Bank  building 
formed  a  part  of  a  small  tract  of  land  laid  out  to  Andrew 
Harris  in  171 2,  comprising  nearly  1 2  acres.16 

14 Ibid.,  page  45. 

x*  Providence  Probate  Records,  Book  W-5,  page  411. 

10  Manuscript  of  Dr.  Franklin  C.  Clark. 


40  RHODE  ISLAND  HISTORICAL  SOCIETY 

John  Angell,  grandson  of  the  first  Thomas,  one  of  the 
original  settlers  of  Providence,  bought  it  from  Harris  in 
1714  and  resold  it  to  his  brother,  Joseph  Angell  in  1722, 
the  deed  being  dated  May  24. ' '  The  Highway  to  Moshanti- 
tuck,  now  Cranston  Street,  was  laid  out  through  one  corner 
of  the  land. 

At  this  time  there  were  no  improvements  on  it,  for  none 
is  mentioned  in  the  deed. 

Joseph  Angell  had  held  possession  of  the  land  for  12 
years  when  on  February  21,  1734-5,  he  sold  a  triangular 
piece  "one  acre  more  or  less,  situated  on  Weybosset  Plain,  a 
little  Southwest  from  the  dwelling  house  of  Ebenezer 
Knight,' '  to  Timothy  Blanchard,  blacksmith.  The  land  con- 
veyed extended  Easterly  and  was  bounded  on  the  West  by 
land  afterward  owned  by  John  Carter.  Its  North  bound  was 
the  highway  to  Newtaconsonutt,  its  South  bound  the  "high- 
way that  leads  to  Moshantituck,"  the  East  bound  being  "in 
the  corner  where  said  two  highways  meet."  This  deed  did 
not  mention  any  buildings  or  improvements  on  the  land. 

The  "highway  leading  toward  Newtaconsonutt"  was  for 
many  years  known  as  High  Street,  the  street  beginning  at 
the  New  Market,  at  the  junction  of  Pawtuxet  Road,  now 
Broad  Street,  and  running  to  the  Johnston  line.  It  is  now 
called  Westminster  Street  which  in  the  days  of  High  Street 
extended  only  from  the  West  side  of  Weybosset  Bridge,  to 
High  Street.  The  "highway  that  leads  to  Moshantituck" 
was  Cranston  Street,  which  formerly  ran  from  164  High 
Street  to  the  West  boundary  line.  This  road  was  laid  out 
in  1717. 

Blanchard  built  a  dwelling  house  on  the  land,  for  when  in 
1739-40  he  conveyed  this  acre  of  land  to  Obadiah  Brown 
another  blacksmith,  for  a  consideration  of  200  pounds,  a 
dwelling  house  thereon  was  mentioned  in  the  deed,  which 
read  "with  my  dwelling  house,  being  my  house  thereon 
standing,  it  being  my  homestead."  The  deed  to  Obadiah 

11  Ibid,  and  Deed  Book  5,  page  210,  Providence  Land  Records. 


THE  OLD  HOYLE  TAVERN  41 

Brown  was  dated  March  3,  1739-40.  This  house  was  later 
the  Hoyle  Tavern. 

Obadiah  Brown  later  became  owner  of  Starve  Goat  Is- 
land in  the  upper  bay,  off  Washington  Park,  now  home 
of  the  Providence  Floating  Hospital  Association.  In  the 
deed  to  the  island,  as  in  one  made  to  him  by  Zachariah 
Mathewson,  dated  January  5,  1 746,  he  is  described  as  "inn- 
holder."18 

Obadiah  Brown  was  Jthe  first  to  open  the  inn  which  in 
later  years  was  so  well  known,  the  first  license  being  granted 
March  14,  1739-40  to  keep  "a  Publick  Ale  House."  He 
paid  1  7  shillings  six  pence  fee,  for  license  to  run  until  the 
following  September,  the  usual  date  for  granting  licenses.10 
He  must  have  been  popular  and  successful  from  the  start, 
for  from  1742  to  1745,  the  Town  Council  met  at  his 
tavern. 

Obadiah  Brown  died  early  in  1753  and  left  his  house  and 
furniture  for  the  use  of  his  widow  during  her  lifetime.  In 
his  will,  dated  April  25  of  that  year,  he  described  himself 
as  "a  yoeman,  alias  innholder."  His  inventory  shows  he 
was  possessed  at  the  time  of  his  death,  of  a  punch  bowl  and 
drinking  glasses,  as  well  as  a  cask  of  rum.  The  term  "yoe- 
man" then  denoted  a  well  to  do  man  lower  in  social  rank 
than  a  gentleman  well  born  and  above  a  "goodman." 

Here,  then,  was  the  beginning  of  the  Hoyle  Tavern  as 
an  inn — March  14,  1739-40 — the  house  itself  being  four 
or  five  years  old  at  that  time.  From  this  period  until  early 
in  1887  when  the  last  license  holder  retired  and  the  rooms 
in  the  old  building  were  used  as  a  lodging  house,  it  was 
one  of  the  best  known  places  in  Rhode  Island. 

In  those  early  days  taverns  were  kept  in  the  houses  of 
the  proprietors  and  the  whole  family  assisted  in  the  duties 
of  entertaining  guests.  The  license  granted  William  Hop- 
kins by  the  Providence  Town  Council  December  13,  1731, 

18  Letter  signed  "S"  in  Providence  Sunday  Journal,   1888,  reprinted 
in  Narragansett  Historical  Register,  Vol.  6,  page  313,  July,  1888. 
111  Dr.  Franklin  C.  Clark  manuscript. 


42  RHODE    ISLAND    HISTORICAL    SOCIETY 

was  "to  keep  a  Publick  aile  house  tipling  and  Victling  house 
in  the  house  where  he  now  Liveth  in  Providence."  The  fee 
was  40  shillings,  although  Jeremiah  Brown  was  that  day 
granted  one  for  26  shillings.2" 

The  fee  paid  for  a  license  depended  on  the  situation  of 
the  inn.  The  Town  Council  ordered,  March  10,  1721,  the 
rate  set  at  20  shillings  for  those  "that  Lieues  adjoyneing 
to  the  Town  street"  that  is,  the  road  between  the  foot  of 
the  hill  and  the  water's  edge,  now  North  and  South  Main 
Streets.  "And  these  others  that  are  Remote  from  said 
Towne  att  the  time  of  there  taking  there  Licence  shall  pay 
downe  the  sum  of  fifteene  shillings  money — at  the  expira- 
tion of  the  year  each  person  shall  pay  enough  to  make  up 
40  shillings'." 

August  18,  1724,  the  Council  "Voated  that  Each  person 
that  is  Licenced  to  Keepe  a  Tauern  in  the  Towne  Row  shall 
pay  the  sum  of  50  shillings  downe ;  takeing  in  Zachariah 
Mathewson  and  William  Allen  also  and  these  that  are 
Licensed  in  the  Woods  shall  pay  the  sum  of  forty  shillings 
downe  Each."  The  woods  were  at  the  very  edge  of  the 
town,  which  then  spread  only  a  short  distance  on  the  West 
side  of  the  river.  As  late  as  1776  it  extended  only  about  a 
mile  along  the  Towne  street  on  the  East  side. 

The  early  inns  were  small,  as  were  all  the  houses  in 
Providence.  Later  they  were  enlarged  as  they  were  built 
to  accommodate  more  custom.  But  always  the  best  among 
them  maintained  a  high  reputation  for  hospitality.  Rev. 
Dr.  Dwight  writing  of  the  New  England  inns  of  the  early 
part  of  the  last  century  said:  "In  a  word,  you  found  in 
these  inns  the  pleasures  of  an  excellent  private  house.  If 
you  were  sick  you  were  nursed  and  befriended  as  in  your 
own  family.  To  rinish  the  story,  your  bills  were  always 
equitable,  calculated  on  what  you  ought  to  pay  and  not 
upon  the  scheme  of  getting  the  most  which  extortion  might 
think  proper  to  demand." J1 

20T/?e  Colonial  Tavern  by  Edward  Field,  Providence,  1897. 
21  Ibid. 


THE  OLD  HOYLE  TAVERN  43 

The  old  Sayles  tavern,  sometimes  called  the  Pidge  Tav- 
ern after  the  successor  of  Sayles,  still  standing  on  North 
Main  Street  nearly  opposite  the  Pawtucket  car  house,  is  one 
of  the  few  remaining  Rhode  Island  examples  of  the  earliest 
type  of  dwelling  house  inn  remaining  unaltered.  Here  the 
liquid  cheer  was  served  from  a  small  closet  opening  from 
the  large  living  room  on  the  ground  floor.  The  bar  itself 
was  a  shelf  set  on  the  lower  half  of  a  Dutch  door  to  this 
closet.  The  Hoyle  Taverri  to  its  very  end  retained  the  old 
kitchen  barroom  almost  unchanged,  although  this  was  suc- 
ceeded in  the  later  days  of  the  establishment  by  a  large  and 
more  modern  barroom  in  an  ell  added  to  the  original 
structure  on  the  High  street  end. 

The  innkeeper  was  one  of  the  leading  citizens  of  the 
town.  In  early  Massachusetts  he  ranked  in  importance 
after  the  minister.  In  Rhode  Island  as  elsewhere  in  New 
England,  he -often  held  office  and  usually  was  a  man  of 
much  influence.  The  first  Town  Clerk  of  Providence  kept 
an  inn  and  the  Town  Council  often  met  there.  Thomas 
Fenner,  who  kept  tavern  at  "his  house  in  the  woods"  near 
Neutaconcit  in  Providence,  was  "Major  for  the  main," 
which  gave  him  command  of  all  the  militia  on  the  main- 
land in  Rhode  Island.  Besides  this  he  was  a  justice  of  the 
peace,  store  keeper  and  a  surveyor  of  no  mean  ability. 

William  Turpin,  licensed  in  Providence  in  1731  and 
other  years,  was  Town  Treasurer.  The  General  Assembly 
sat  in  the  Turpin  house,  located  on  the  West  side  of  the 
present  North  Main  Street.  The  list  of  licenses  granted 
by  the  Providence  Town  Council  July  6,  1717,  numbering 
13,  was  headed  by  Lieut.  William  Harris  and  "Sarjant 
William  Turpen" — the  same  who  became  Town  Treasurer. 
James  Sabin,  who  kept  the  tavern  at  South  Main  and  Power 
Streets  where  the  Gaspee  plot  was  hatched,  was  a  Colonel. 

The  tavern  was  the  resort  of  everyone  in  the  town,  for 
the  use  of  ale  and  liquor  was  universal,  even  by  the  clergy ; 
there  all  the  news  centered ;  there  politics  originated  and 
public  movements  started ;  any  public  meetings  held,  were 


44  RHODE  ISLAND  HISTORICAL  SOCIETY 

at  the  tavern.  It  was  the  centre  of  town  life,  town  politics, 
town  activity — even  of  town  history  in  many  cases. 

Licenses  were  issued  only  to  men  of  good  character.  In 
Providence  as  in  other  towns,  the  Town  Council  usually 
met  at  the  house  of  some  one  of  these  licensed  tavern 
keepers  and  dined  there  at  the  expense  of  the  town  at  these 
meetings. 

"The  constituted  authorities  then  deemed  it  proper  to 
patronize  the  houses  they  licensed  and  there  does  not  appear 
any  great  disproportion  between  the  amounts  charged  for 
dinners  and  for  the  liquor  that  followed  them,"  says 
Staples  in  his  "Annals  of  Providence." 

"for  instance:  a  bill  in  the  City  Clerk's  office  charges, 
April  3,  1757,  six  dinners  at  5  pounds  8  shillings}  punch 
two  pounds  j  May  28,  seven  dinners  at  6  pounds  6  shillings; 
punch  2  pounds."  Luke  Thurston  in  a  bill  similarly  pre- 
served, charges  for  the  Town  Council,  "dinners,  &c;  din- 
ners and  liquor  j  dinners,  punch  and  wine." 

The  number  of  tavern  licenses  in  Providence  varied  in 
several  years,  but  generally  was  between  20  and  30,  the 
highest  fee  paid  being  12  pounds.  In  1749  Providence  had 
31  tavern  keepers.  There  were  then  3177  whites,  225 
negroes  and  50  Indians  in  the  town,  a  total  of  3452,  giving 
an  inn  for  every  1 1 1  persons.  In  1  750  there  were  30  taverns, 
the  highest  fee  being  then  eight  pounds,  paid  by  only  three 
of  the  tavern  keepers."" 

Providence  still  is  one  of  the  smallest  American  cities 
in  area  although  a  leader  in  population,  yet  until  1868 
Parkis  Avenue  marked  its  Southern  boundary  with  Crans- 
ton, on  the  Pawtuxet  Road,  now  Broad  Street.  At  the 
time  the  Hoyle  Tavern  was  first  opened,  the  town  lay  for 
a  mile  along  the  Easterly  side  of  Towne  Street,  the  present 
North  and  South  Main  Streets,  its  later  growth  first  ex- 
tending up  the  hillside  along  which  the  Proprietor's  lots 
lay,  behind  this  main  highway. 

22 Staples'  Annals  of  Providence. 


THE  OLD  HOYLE  TAVERN  45 

Weybosset  Bridge,  crossing  the  river  to  reach  the  sec- 
tion on  the  West  side  which  at  one  time  it  was  proposed  to 
make  a  separate  town  with  the  name  Westminster,  was 
several  times  destroyed  by  tides  and  freshets  and  in  1 746, 
the  year  in  which  Obadiah  Brown  was  first  described  as 
innholder,  was  rebuilt  with  the  proceeds  of  a  lottery  and 
widened  to  1  8  feet. 

The  roads  were  unbelievedly  poor,  both  in  the  town  and 
outside  it  and  progress  over  them  was  slow — one  reason 
why  taverns  were  often  located  every  mile  or  so.  The  earli- 
est travel  was  by  horseback  and  it  was  well  along  in  the  cen- 
tury that  saw  the  opening  of  the  Hoyle  Tavern,  before 
stage  coaches  became  general. 

Describing  the  condition  of  the  roads  at  the  time,  Samuel 
Thurber  wrote:  "May,  1776,  I  went  to  Pomfret,  36  miles, 
in  a  chaise ;  the  road  was  so  stony  and  rough  that  I  could 
not  ride  out  "of  a  slow  walk  but  very  little  of  the  way.  I 
was  near  two  days  in  going.  Such  was  the  general  state  of 
our  roads  at  the  time. 

"About  this  time  there  would  be,  now  and  then,  a  person 
who  wanted  a  passage  to  Boston.  Col.  William  Brown, 
who  lived  quite  at  the  Northeast  corner  of  the  town,  on  a 
farm,  kept  what  was  called  a  curricle,  drawn  by  two  horses ; 
he  would  be  their  carrier.  It  would  take  him  about  three 
days  to  go  and  return."23 

The  main  roads  were  improved  but  little  until  many  of 
them  were  taken  over  as  turnpikes  by  private  corporations 
which  collected  toll  in  return  for  their  improvement.  These 
turnpike  companies  came  much  later — -the  Norwich  Pike, 
which  began  at  the  Hoyle  being  opened  in  1 794  and  con- 
tinuing until  1857.  This  was  a  branch  of  the  Douglas  and 
Providence  Pike,  one  of  the  three  turnpikes  permitted  to 
enter  the  town  while  privately  owned.  It  ran  down  West- 
minster to  the  corner  of  what  is  now  Stokes  Street,  thence 
along  the  line  of  Plainfield  Street  to  Cranston,  South  Sci- 

23  Samuel  Thurber's  letter  in  Staples'  Annals  of  Providence. 


4')  RHODE    ISLAND    HISTORICAL    SOCIETY 

tuate  and  Richmond,  to  the  Connecticut  State  line  near 
Oneco.24 

The  Hartford  Turnpike,  now  a  State  road  still  known  as 
the  Hartford  Pike,  ran  for  part  of  its  way  over  the  Prov- 
idence and  Norwich  Pike.  It  extended  through  Scituate 
and  reached  Connecticut  at  Killingly.  With  such  roads, 
travel  was  necessarily  slow  and  a  day's  journey  was  a  short 
one.  Taverns  at  frequent  intervals  were  a  necessity  of  the 
tunes. 

The  Hoyle  was  first  a  stopping  place  for  farmers  and 
others  using  the  two  main  roads  that  passed  it  on  either  side 
and  later,  as  the  town  grew  and  living  conditions  became 
easier,  was  a  popular  place  of  resort  for  the  young  people 
of  the  town.  It  became  noted  as  a  place  serving  good  cheer 
in  liquids  and  food,  the  objective  of  sleighing  parties  in 
winter  and  of  evening  drives  in  summer. 

"Situated  as  it  was,  far  out  in  the  country,  with  no  bridge 
to  cross  the  river  from  the  East  side,  the  jovial  parties  of 
young  men  and  women  had  to  go  far  out  in  the  country 
in  their  excursions  to  wind  up  in  a  dance  and  a  good  time 
at  the  Hoyle"  says  one  chronicler.  "It  was  the  earliest 
tavern  on  the  West  side.~r' 

It  is  a  bit  difficult  to  understand  this  reference,  for  such 
detours  were  necessary  only  when  Weybosset  bridge,  which 
had  been  built  before  the  tavern  was  first  opened,  was  in 
repair  or  had  been  carried  away.  It  is  possible  that  this  may 
refer  to  the  tavern  opened  by  Dr.  John  Hoyle  at  a  much 
earlier  date  and  situated  in  Triptown,  the  present  Manton. 

This  quotation  probably  refers  to  the  statement  of  Wil- 
liam Woodward,  who  told  Stephen  D.  Olney  "that  in  the 
days  of  his  youth  when  the  young  folks  on  that  side  of  the 
river  wanted  to  get  up  a  dance  or  ball,  they  had  to  go  out 
into  the  country  to  get  at  a  tavern  to  be  accomodated,  which 
he   said  was   the   old   Hoyle   Tavern   and   sometimes   on 

24  Providence  Sunday  Journal,  January  2  5,1  890. 
25 History  of  Providence  Counts,  Bavles. 


THE  OLD  HOYLE  TAVERN  47 

account  of  the  bridge  being  out  of  repair,  they  had  to  go 
around  over  Smith's  Hill  and  Olneyville  to  get  at  the 
tavern.""" 

To  the  end  of  its  career  it  retained  its  popularity  as  a 
resort  for  horsemen  and  farmers  and  when  the  buildings 
were  sold  at  auction  in  1  890  preparatory  to  clearing  the  site, 
these  former  customers  made  up  a  very  considerable  part 
of  the  crowd  attending  the  sale. 

Obadiah  Brown  must  have  been  successful  from  the  start 
of  his  tavern,  for  its  location  between  two  main  roads  was 
excellent  and  its  owner  continued  to  buy  property.  After 
his  death  in  1  753,  his  widow  Martha  carried  on  the  tavern 
for  a  quarter  century  until  her  death  in  1778."'  The  first 
license  found  in  her  name  was  dated  October,  1753.  She  was 
allowed  to  keep  a  victualling  house  and  to  sell  liquors  on 
the  usual  conditions,  to  preserve  order  on  the  premises  and 
to  permit  no  gambling  or  other  unlawful  practices. 

Widow  Martha  died  at  the  close  of  1778.  She  had  only 
a  life  interest  in  the  property  which  she  managed  so  well 
for  a  full  quarter-century,  the  longest  tenancy  of  any 
license  holder  in  the  history  of  the  tavern.  She  left  what 
must  have  been  a  prosperous  and  profitable  inn  but  there 
is  no  record  of  any  other  host  there  until  Col.  Joseph  Hoyle 
took  it  over  in  1783.  He  bought  the  property  from  the 
devisees  of  Obadiah  Brown  for  2000  "good  Spanish  milled 
dollars,"  which  at  the  scale  of  depreciation  adopted  in  June, 
1781  was  equivalent  to  $320,000  Continental  old  emission. 
Col.  Hoyle  already  owned  land  in  that  vicinity  and 
nearer  the  river,  for  he  had  been  buying  at  intervals  since 
1 772,  starting  with  land  adjoining  his  own  on  Union  street, 
adding  a  piece  near  Dock  street  and  in  1777  and  1778  buy- 
ing from  other  children  of  James  Hoyle,  their  shares  in 
the  estate  of  their  father. 

Some  of  this  land,  like  that  of  his  sister  Phebe  whose  one 

~fi  The  Old  Taverns  of  Providence  by  Elisha  Dyer,   in  Narragansett 
Historical  Register,  Vol.  5,  No.  2,  page  145,  October,  1886. 
27  Dr.  Franklin  C.  Clark  manuscript. 


48  RHODE  ISLAND  HISTORICAL  SOCIETY 

and  one-half  acres  was  an  award  in  her  successful  suit  for 
her  legal  share  (1778)  and  that  bought  in  1782  from 
Anthony  and  Lydia  Westcott  for  108  Spanish  milled  dol- 
lars was  described  as  being  "near  Widow  Martha  Brown" 
so  he  apparently  was  reaching  out  to  reunite  the  acres 
scattered  by  his  father's  death.  In  the  earlier  deeds  he  is 
termed  "cooper"  or  "cooper,  alias  yoeman,"  but  from  1777 
on  he  is  described  as  "yoeman."  The  Providence  land 
records  show  17  transfers  of  realty  to  him. 

The  deed  was  dated  April  22,  1783.  That  was  the  day 
on  which  Providence  celebrated  the  cessation  of  arms  pro- 
claimed by  Congress  on  the  1  1th  of  April,  following  the 
signing  of  the  treaty  of  peace  between  the  United  States 
and  Great  Britain  at  Versailles  in  January — the  official  end 
of  the  War  for  Independence. 

The  morning  opened  with  a  discharge  of  cannon  and  the 
ringing  of  bells  in  the  town.  The  Continental  frigate 
Alliance,  then  in  Providence  harbor,  was  decked  with  flags, 
as  was  the  rest  of  the  shipping.  A  civic  procession  escorted 
by  the  Artillery,  marched  from  the  house  of  Deputy  Gov- 
ernor Jabez  Bowen  to  the  Baptist  meeting  house,  where 
Rev.  Enos  Hitchcock,  minister  of  the  First  Congregational 
Society  of  which  Dr.  John  Hoyle  was  one  of  the  founders, 
preached  a  sermon  followed  by  an  oration  by  Asher  Rob- 
bins,  later  of  Newport  but  then  a  tutor  at  the  college  here. 

After  the  services  at  the  meeting  house,  the  procession 
marched  to  the  court  house,  where  the  proclamation  of 
Congress  for  a  cessation  of  arms  was  read  from  the  balcony, 
followed  by  a  discharge  of  cannon  from  the  State  House 
parade,  and  a  battery  on  the  East  hill  near  the  beacon. 
The  proclamation  was  also  read  in  two  other  places,  after 
which  the  procession  returned  to  the  State  House  where  a 
dinner  was  served,  followed  by  1 3  toasts,  each  under  a 
discharge  of  1  3  cannon.  In  the  evening  the  State  House  and 
the  Market  House,  now  the  Chamber  of  Commerce  build- 
ing in  Market  Square,  were  illuminated  and  a  display  of 
fireworks  closed  the  day."s 

28  Annals  of  Providence,  Staples. 

(  To  be  concluded) 


ALLEGED  RUNIC  INSCRIPTIONS  IN  R.  I.  49 

Alleged  Runic  Inscriptions  in  Rhode  Island 

By  Edmund  B.  Delabarre 

The  first  hint  that  the  Vinland  of  the  Northmen  was  in 
the  vicinity  of  Narragansett  Bay  was  given  just  about  a 
hundred  years  ago,  by^ Professor  Rafn  of  Denmark,  in  the 
book  called  Antiquit  cites  Americanae.  The  idea  took  firm 
hold  of  popular  imagination  and  material  evidences  of  the 
Northmen's  presence  were  eagerly  sought  and  ardently 
defended. 

The  evidence  to  be  gathered  from  the  Sagas  themselves 
is  conflicting  and  uncertain.  Attempts  to  interpret  it  in 
terms  of  definite  localities  have  been  numerous  and  vacillat- 
ing. Of  recent  writers,  Edward  F.  Gray  ( "Leif  Eriksson," 
1930)  tries  to  prove  from  the  saga  descriptions  that  the 
Norse  headquarters  were  on  Martha's  Vineyard  and  No- 
mansland;  while  Dr.  Wilfred  Grenfell  ("Romance  of 
Labrador,"  1934)  is  equally  sure  that  they  were  in  Labra- 
dor. Both  of  them  examine  every  item  of  evidence  with 
skill  and  care.  The  reader  who,  like  myself,  pretends  to  no 
expert  knowledge  on  the  subject,  is  inclined  to  agree  with 
each  as  he  reads  him  but  to  decide  in  the  end  that  so  far  the 
question  has  not  been  settled.  The  situation  is  well  expressed 
by  Henry  C.  Kittredge  in  his  book  on  "Cape  Cod,"  where 
he  says:  "Human  nature  too  readily  bends  the  large  phrases 
of  the  sagas  to  fit  the  contours  of  any  desired  landscape.  The 
wisest  men  and  the  best  authorities  unite  in  their  skepticism 
regarding  all  such  alleged  Norse  itineraries." 

With  reference  to  alleged  material  records  and  indica- 
tions of  their  presence,  however,  the  case  is  entirely  differ- 
ent. There  is  nothing  dubious  about  them.  If  any  unques- 
tionable instance  of  the  sort  could  be  discovered  it  would  be 
of  the  utmost  importance.  Time  after  time  candidates  for 
this  dignity  have  been  advanced,  but  one  after  another  they 
have  fallen  in  the  light  of  careful  examination  and  sound 


50  RHODE   ISLAND  HISTORICAL  SOCIETY 

criticism.  They  have  been  defended  with  much  more  of 
emotional  wish  to  believe  than  with  credible  evidence. 
Nevertheless,  the  widespread  popular  desire  to  prove  the 
presence  of  Northmen  in  these  regions  persists  with  remark- 
able but  understandable  fervor.  It  never  yet  has  been  re- 
warded by  calmly  acceptable  verification.  lake  Dighton 
Rock,  the  inscribed  rocks  at  Tiverton,  Portsmouth,  and 
Mark  Rock  in  Rhode  Island  have  been  proved  to  bear  no 
runic  records.  Like  the  famous  "skeleton-in-armor"  in 
nearby  Massachusetts,  the  stone  tower  in  Newport  has  been 
proved  to  have  had  no  commerce  with  the  Northmen;  it  is 
what  remains  of  a  well-authenticated  Colonial  windmill. 

There  is  a  rock  on  the  storm-swept  beach  of  Nomansland 
which  bears  an  indubitable  record  in  runic  letters  and  a  date 
in  Roman  numerals.  1  have  studied  it  carefully,  and  when 
I  report  upon  my  conclusions  I  shall  give  what  1  believe  to 
be  convincing  evidence  that  it  was  carved  certainly  not  more 
than  a  hundred  years  ago  and  probably  at  some  time  within 
the  present  century. 

The  only  other  pertinent  record  in  this  vicinity  is  that  of 
the  rock  lying  on  the  shore  near  the  base  of  Mount  Hope. 
At  the  time  when  I  wrote  about  it  some  years  ago,  it  was 
widely  believed  that  it  was  a  Norse  runic  inscription,  but 
so  far  as  I  knew  no  attempt  had  been  made  to  translate  it 
except  an  absurd  and  unsupported  one  by  Ernest  Fales. 
Very  recently  I  have  learned  of  an  unpublished  translation 
by  a  reputable  scholar.  1  am  glad  to  acknowledge  my  in- 
debtedness to  Mrs.  Dorothy  M.  Barry  of  Portland,  who 
has  made  it  possible  to  add  it  to  the  historical  data  concern- 
ing this  interesting  rock. 

On  January  29,  1899,  John  E.  Mullaly  of  Fall  River, 
and  a  companion  whose  initials  were  BEG,  chalked  the 
characters  on  the  rock  as  they  saw  them,  photographed  them 
(see  illustration  herewith  ),  and  sent  the  photograph  to 
Professor  Adrian  Scott.  Scott  had  been  earlier  connected 
with  Brown  I  niversity  as  a  teacher  of  Germanic  and  Scan- 
dinavian Philology.  He  found  it  possible  to  see  the  charac- 


ALLEGED  RUXIC   INSCRIPTIONS   IN    R.    I. 


51 


THE    MOUNT    HOPE    INSCRIPTION   AS   PHOTOGRAPHED   IN    1899 


ters  as  runic  letters,  and  expressed  complete  confidence  that 
he  had  read  them  correctly.  I  condense  his  exposition  as 
much  as  possible.  Anyone  can  see  what  Scott  believed  that 
he  found  if  he  will  consult  a  Table  of  Runic  Letters;* 
select  the  ones  representing  our  letters  "hallr  vakkzt," 
writing  the  /  and  k  only  once  but  attaching  a  horizontal  line 
underneath  each  as  a  sign  of  its  doubling;  and  then  imagine 
all  these  letters  as  rotated  a  quarter-turn  to  the  right  so  as 
to  lie  sidewise  in  the  line  instead  of  upright.  The  "hallr" 
is  the  nominative  form  of  the  proper  name  "Hall ; "  the  verb 
"vakka"  means  "to  stray,"  and  the  "-zt"  is  the  reflexive 
sign.  Therefore,  according  to  Scott,  the  whole  means:  "Hall 
went  astray  of  himself  and  was  lost  here." 

There  are  plenty  of  good  reasons  for  rejecting  this  read- 
ing of  the  inscription.  The  lines  as  chalked  in  1899  are 
shown  in  poor  perspective,  some  of  them  are  blurred,  and 
my  own  later  studies  prove  that  many  were  mistakenly 
drawn.   Scott  did  not  accept  them  exactly  as  drawn  in  more 


*Runic  letters  were  variable.  The  Table  in  the  Encyclopedia  Ameri- 
cana gives  them  about  as  Scott  wrote  them,  except  that  the  runic  u  is 
to  be  used  for  v,  and  z  is  to  be  taken  as  the  reverse  of  /. 


^J.  RHODE  ISLAND  HISTORICAL  SOCIETY 

than  three  or  four  cases,  but  supplied  much  by  his  own 
imagination.  The  message  that  he  found  would  have  been 
an  unbelievably  trivial  thing  for  the  Northmen  to  have 
taken  pains  to  carve,  when  they  left  no  other  and  more 
significant  record  anywhere  on  the  coast  of  America.  My 
own  Cherokee-Wampanoag  reading,  attributed  to  about 
the  year  1834,  still  remains  the  most  probably  correct  ren- 
dering of  the  inscription. 

In  spite  of  repeated  disappointments  of  the  hope  that 
alleged  Norse  remains  may  prove  to  be  genuine,  new  at- 
tempts to  find  and  defend  them  continually  arise.  Besides 
actual  inscriptions,  another  class  of  marks  upon  rocks  must 
engage  our  attention  in  this  connection,  such  as  glacial  scor- 
ings, weathering  phenomena,  natural  veins  or  intrusions  in 
the  rock,  or  marks  due  to  other  natural  causes ;  or  such  as 
those  produced  accidentally  by  human  agency  in  the  course 
of  grinding  or  ploughing  operations.  These  are  seized  upon 
sometimes  by  the  ardent  advocates  of  runic  inscriptions  as 
examples  of  Norse  writing.  A  recent  case  of  this  sort  de- 
serves examination. 

Two  letters  were  received  by  this  Society  last  August, 
reporting  the  existence  of  a  rock  with  mysterious  markings 
at  Chopmist  Orchards  in  North  Scituate.  The  correspond- 
ents were  very  fair  in  their  attitude  toward  it.  As  one  of 
them  said:  "I  do  not  consider  myself  qualified  to  give  an 
opinion  on  the  characters;  my  judgment  might  be  influ- 
enced by  my  hopes."  Their  hopes,  evidently,  were  that  the 
markings  might  turn  out  to  be  a  runic  record  of  genuine 
antiquity.   No  one  can  dispute  their  right  to  such  a  hope. 

The  problem  having  been  placed  in  my  hands,  I  went 
with  one  of  the  writers  to  examine  the  rock.  It  is  a  flattish 
stone,  whose  appearance  on  its  marked  face  is  shown  in  the 
accompanying  photograph.  It  lies  close  to  the  base  of  a 
stone  wall  and  evidently  has  been  removed  at  some  time  in 
the  past  from  somewhere  within  the  neighboring  orchard. 
The  same  is  true  of  numerous  other  stones  lying  close  to  the 
wall,  whose  presence  there  is  due  clearly  to  no  other  cause 


ALLEGED  RUNIC   INSCRIPTIONS   IN   R.   I. 


53 


A  PLOUGH-SCORED  ROCK    AT  CHOPMIST  ORCHARDS 


than  that  they  had  become  nuisances  in  the  course  of  long- 
ago  ploughing  of  the  field. 

The  right  edge  of  the  stone  as  the  photograph  shows  it 
measures  about  2  feet  7  inches,  the  base  2  feet  4  inches,  the 
left  edge  so  far  as  it  runs  straight  about  1  foot  6  inches.  The 
thickness  is  1  foot  3  inches  at  the  right  side,  tapering  uni- 
formly to  a  thin  edge  at  the  left.  The  weight  is  about  500 
pounds.  The  rock  is  fine-grained  granite.  The  marked  sur- 
face is  almost  flat,  with  the  upper  half  much  pitted  and 
weathered  and  the  lower  half  smooth,  and  with  a  slight 
angle  between  the  two  parts.  It  seems  to  have  been  shaped 
by  glacial  action,  and  not  by  artificial  dressing  as  one  ob- 
server suggested.  The  marks  are  from  6  to  8  inches  long, 
about  Yi  inch  wide,  with  a  smooth  rounded  section. 

It  will  be  noticed  that  all  the  sure  scored  lines  run  almost 
straight  in  one  direction  only,  vertically  in  the  photograph, 


54  RHODE    ISLAND    HISTORICAL    SOCIETY 

with  only  slight  deviations  in  direction  or  curvature.  Addi- 
tional side-lines  attached  to  them,  such  as  would  be  neces- 
sary in  order  to  make  them  resemble  letters  of  any  alphabet, 
runic  or  other,  have  been  surmised.  I  am  very  sure  that  all 
such  supposed  additional  marks  are  matters  of  guess-work 
only,  with  no  support  justifying  one  guess  in  preference  to  a 
dozen  others,  and  are  based  actually  upon  weatherings  of 
the  rock.  Whatever  their  origin,  they  are  of  no  least  value 
as  evidence  of  ancient  Norse  wanderings,  and  one  who  seeks 
signs  of  the  latter  can  not  profitably  appeal  to  any  such  dubi- 
ous scratches  and  pittings  in  support  of  his  belief. 

The  clear  and  indubitable  scratches  on  this  stone  can  be 
understood  most  satisfactorily  as  the  scorings  of  a  plough. 
To  this  opinion  my  correspondents  have  objected  that 
farmers  whom  they  have  talked  with  are  agreed  that  no 
team  of  horses  would  be  powerful  enough  to  make  marks 
of  such  depth  on  granite,  and  that  no  plough  could  with- 
stand the  impact  without  breaking.  The  argument  which  1 
present  below  is  essentially  a  repetition  of  what  1  have  writ- 
ten to  them  in  reply. 

The  earliest  suggestion  that  markings  of  this  kind  could 
be  made  by  plough  was  made  to  me  many  years  ago  at 
Sachuest  Point  by  a  farmer,  by  the  side  of  whose  field  lay 
a  stone  on  which  I  saw  what  at  first  I  suspected  might  possi- 
bly be  Indian  pictographs.  But  he  told  me  that  the  marks 
were  made  by  plough,  or  some  by  crowbar  in  getting  it  out 
of  the  field.  This  was  a  new  idea  to  me;  but  on  looking 
around,  I  found  a  number  of  other  stones  similarly  marked 
lying  on  the  borders  of  the  field  and  all  evidently  taken  out 
from  it.  Since  then,  searching  for  Indian  relics,  I  have  seen 
many  other  examples  of  similar  scorings  on  stones.  There  is 
hardly  any  possibility  that  the  marks  I  have  in  mind  were 
made  in  any  other  manner  than  by  a  plough.  There  is  no 
doubt  that  in  a  stony  held  the  plough  often  scrapes  along  on 
stones  without  damage  to  itself.  A  big  stone  lying  high 
enough  up  to  be  seen  would  be  avoided,  by  going  around  or 
by  lifting  over.  But  one  far  enough  under  the  surface  not  to 


ALLEGED  RUXIC  INSCRIPTIONS  IN   R.   I. 


55 


be  a  very  serious  obstacle— though  it  might  become  such  lat- 
er by  frost-heaving  or  soil-erosion  or  otherwise — would  be 
scratched  by  the  plough  year  after  year  in  different  places 
and  to  different  depths,  and  no  farmer  would  know  or  care 
how  deeply  he  had  scratched  it  if  didn't  annoy  him  much 
The  ice-age  was  lavish  in  its  gifts  of  glacial  boulders  to 
the  fields  of  New  England.  In  relatively  few  of  them,  of 
course,  are  the  boulders  such  flatfish  slabs  as  we  are  con- 
sidering; but  such  cases  exist  in  fair  numbers.  In  any  one  of 
them,  few  of  the  stones  would  be  likely  to  lie  with  the  upper 
surface  nearly  parallel  to  the  surface  of  the  ground  and  at 
just  the  right  depth  to  engage  the  nose  of  a  plough  lightly; 
but  there  might  easily  be  a  number  of  them;  and  some  of 
them  might  become  worse  obstacles  as  time  went  on,  and 
eventually  get  dug  out.  The  Chopmist  stone  may  have  lain 
originally  with  the  now  marked  half  of  its  face  projecting 
just  a  little  into  the  tilled  soil,  where  it  would  become 
gradually  roughened  by  weathering  influences;  and  with 
the  smooth  half  buried  in  the  subsoil  and  so  protected  from 
such  decay.  If  the  ploughing  was  done  repeatedly  in  the 


same  direction,  along  the  gentle  upslope  of  the  stone,  the 
plough  would  slide  across  it  without  much  difficulty.  It 
would  get  hit,  year  after  year,  in  different  places,  rarely  if 
ever  twice  in  exactly  the  same  way.  A  number  of  nearly 
parallel  marks  would  be  made  upon  it,  sometimes  running 
straight,  sometimes  a  little  curved.  If  now  such  natural 
agencies  as  I  have  mentioned  at  last  brought  the  stone 
nearer  to  the  surface  and  made  it  more  of  an  obstacle,  or  if 
the  direction  of  ploughing  was  reversed  so  that  the  stone 


56  RHODE  ISLAND  HISTORICAL  SOCIETY 

was  hit  squarely  against  its  most  projecting  part,  then  con- 
ceivably the  plough  might  break;  but  also  it  might  happen 
that  a  stone  no  heavier  than  this  would  get  dislodged 
slightly.  In  either  case,  the  farmer  might  become  exasper- 
ated enough  to  dig  it  out.  The  abundance  of  flatfish  stones 
now  lying  in  and  alongside  such  a  field  as  that  at  Chopmist, 
and  the  one  at  Sachuest  Point,  and  elsewhere,  shows  that 
farmers  have  often  gone  to  that  trouble.  It  is  very  sure  that 
they  wrould  rarely  take  any  interest  in  the  marks  that  had 
previously  been  made  on  the  stones.  They  might  have 
later  beliefs  that  the  strength  of  horses  and  the  resistance  of 
ploughs  to  breaking  would  be  inadequate  for  the  production 
of  such  grooves  as  we  find  on  the  Chopmist  stone.  But  they 
would  not  have  founded  those  opinions  upon  actual  obser- 
vation. 

I  feel  sure  that  the  only  Chopmist  marks  wrhich  can  be 
accepted  as  due  to  human  agency  are  the  approximately 
vertical  ones.  If  not  made  by  plough,  I  would  have  to  be- 
lieve that  they  were  somehow  made  by  nature,  perhaps  as 
glacial  scratches.  A  few  further  considerations  are  strongly 
in  favor  of  the  plough  theory.  The  Melds  wrhere  I  have 
observed  stones  thus  marked  have  been  under  cultivation 
for  a  very  long  time.  In  old  days  oxen  were  used  for  culti- 
vation much  more  often  than  horses.  Oxen  are  more  power- 
ful and  patient.  Their  slower  motion  and  persistent  pull 
wrould  involve  much  less  strain  upon  the  plough  and  wrould 
produce  these  effects  more  easily.  I  am  assured  by  an 
expert  geologist,  Professor  Charles  \V.  Browrn,  that  fine- 
grained granite  would  take  such  marks  without  difficulty $ 
though  hard,  it  is  not  too  resistant  to  abrasion.  Finally,  a 
pretty  fair  test  of  a  theory  is  its  capacity  to  serve  as  basis  for 
successful  prediction.  After  studying  the  Chopmist  stone,  I 
expressed  the  belief  that  there  must  be  other  stones  within 
the  orchard  or  alongside  it,  with  similar  markings  on  them; 
and  without  giving  much  time  to  the  search,  wre  found  one 
lying  on  the  stone  wall. 

In  the  light  of  these  considerations,  a  stone   found  in 


ALLEGED  RUNIC  INSCRIPTIONS  IN   R.   I.  57 

Hampton,  New  Hampshire,  becomes  a  useful  bit  of  corrob- 
orative evidence.  I  have  spoken  of  it  somewhat  dubiously 
in  earlier  writings.  Since  then  I  have  found  the  original  and 
full  description  of  it,  in  the  Boston  Weekly  Journal  for  July 
1  8,  1902.  The  writer  says  that  the  stone  had  been  discov- 
ered not  more  than  20  years  earlier,  that  it  lies  in  the  earth 
with  its  face  near  the  top  of  the  ground,  and  that  the  field 
has  been  under  tillage  for  over  1 50  years.  This  description, 
and  the  pictures  of  the" markings  (one  version  of  which  I 
published  in  my  book  on  "Dighton  Rock" )  leave  me  con- 
fident that  it  is  another  case  of  plough-marks.  Yet,  along 
with  many  other  impossible  cases,  it  has  been  confidently 
accepted  by  many  persons  as  a  relic  of  the  Northmen. 

There  are  only  two  alleged  runic  records  anywhere  in 
America  about  which  there  is  any  present  controversy:  those 
at  Yarmouth  in  Nova  Scotia  and  at  Kensington  in  Minne- 
sota. I  leave  them  in  the  hands  of  the  disputants.  Within 
the  limits  of  New  England,  nothing  which  has  ever  yet  been 
advocated  as  a  material  relic  or  record  of  the  Vinland  voy- 
ages has  the  least  chance  of  being  accepted  by  competent 
scholars  as  anything  of  the  sort. 


New  Publications  of  Rhode  Island  Interest 

A  History  of  South  Kingstown  by  Charles  Comstock, 
1806,  has  been  privately  reprinted  by  William  Davis 
Miller,  Esq. 

A  Letter  written  by  Maj.  John  Talcott  from  Mr.  Stan- 
ton's at  Quonocontaug,  July  4,  1677  has  been  issued  by 
the  Society  of  Colonial  Wars  in  Rhode  Island  as  a  pam- 
phlet of  15  pages,  including  two  maps  by  Norman  M. 
Isham. 

More  Recollections  of  the  Hop-pin  Family  collected  by 
Eliza  Hoppin  Richmond  Waller,  December,  1934,  is  a 
pamphlet  of  22  pages,  containing  an  account  of  her  family 
written  in  1868  by  Mrs.  Harriet  Dunn  Hoppin  ("Mother 


58  RHODE  ISLAND  HISTORICAL  SOCIETY 

Auton")  and  notes  upon  Claude  Gabriel,  the  colored  man 
who  became  body  servant  to  the  Czar  Alexander. 

A  sermon  on  the  Right  Rev.  George  Berkeley,  D.D., 
Bishop  of  Cloyne,  preached  by  the  Rev.  A.  A.  Luce,  D.D., 
on  Sept.  12,  1934,  and  printed  in  the  Church  of  Ireland 
Gazette  for  Sept.  28,  1934,  has  been  presented  by  Mrs. 
Richard  Rathborne  Graham. 

Three  early  pictures  of  the  French  fleet  at  Newport  are 
reproduced  in  the  February  1935  issue  of  the  United 
States  Naval  Institute  Proceedings ;  D'Estaing  forcing  the 
entrance  into  Newport,  August  8,  1778  (p.  155),  The 
French  fleet  leaving  the  Newport  offing  for  Boston,  August 
21,  1 778 (  page  157),  and  Arrival  of  French  army  and 
escort,  1780  (page  160). 


Notes 

The  following  persons  have  been  elected  to  membership 
in  the  Society: 

Mr.  Henry  L.  P.  Beckwith       Miss  Adelaide  Knight 
Rev.  Arthur  H.  Bradford         Mrs.  Philip C.  Sheldon 
Mr.  Edgar  Brunschwig  Mrs.  Helen  C.  Vose 

The  Rhode  Island  Historical  Society  reminds  its  mem- 
bers and  friends  of  its  very  special  interest  in  the  materials 
of  local  history.  Early  pamphlets  or  books  printed  in  Rhode 
Island,  newspapers  or  periodicals  published  in  Rhode 
Island,  and  printed  or  manuscript  material  bearing  on 
Rhode  Island  history  are  earnestly  solicited  as  gifts.  At  the 
present  time  the  Society  is  particularly  desirous  of  obtaining 
the  following  books: 

Newport  Directory  1934         Providence  Tax  Book  1934 
Pawtucket  Directory  1934      Cranston  Tax  Book  1934 
Providence  Directory  1935     Warwick  Tax  Book  1934 
Woonsocket  Directory  1934   Pawtucket  Tax  Book  1934 
Westerly  Directory  1933-34 


60  RHODE    ISLAND    HISTORICAL    SOCIETY 

Rhode  Island  Historical  Society 
Treasurer's  Report 

INCOME  ACCOUNT   FOR  THE   YEAR   1934 


Receipts 


Annual  Dues  $2,400.00 

Dividends  and    Interest 4,047.5  5 

Rental  of  Rooms 100.00 

State  Appropriation 1,500.00 


$8,047.55 
Expenditures  exceed  income 1  82.87 


$8,230.42 


treasurer's  report  61 

Expenditures 

Binding    $     116.33 

Books   340.67 

Electric  Light  and  Gas 36.40 

Lectures  and  Exhibitions 1  39.84 

Expense   1 16.00 

Grounds  and  Building 3  5  8.33 

Heating   * 700.00 

Newspaper   19.10 

Publication  5  82.36 

Salaries  5,580.00 

Supplies    169.61 

Telephone    63.78 

Water  8.00 


$8,230.42 


PRINCIPAL  ACCOUNT  FOR  THE  YEAR   1934 


Receipts 

Reserve  Fund  $         9.00 

Revolving  Publication  Fund 35.71 

New  York  Central  Railroad  Company,  Rights  Sold 1 1  1.85 


$     156.56 
Balance  January   1,   1934 2,496.69 

$2,653.25 

Payments 

Reserve  Fund  $       77.99 

Balance  December  31,  1934 2,575.26 

$2,653.25 


62  KHODE  ISLAND  HISTORICAL  SOCIETY 

STATEMENT  OF  CONDITION,  DECEMBER   31,   1934 


Assets 
Grounds  and  Building $    2  5,000.00 


Investments: 

Bonds 

$4,000.   Cedars  Rapids  Mfg.  &  Power  Co.   1st 

5s,  1953  $3,228.88 

3,000.  Central  Mfg.  District  4}£s,  1941 3,000.00 

3,000.   Cleveland  Elec.   Illuminating  Co.    5s, 

1939 2,565.42 

4,000.   Dominion  of  Government  of  Canada, 

5s,  1952  4,003.91 

1,000.   Western  Electric  Co.  5s,  1944 998.17 

4,000.   61    Broadwav  Bldg.,   1st  Mtge.    $y2s, 

1950 4,000.00 

4,000.    Minnesota  Power  &  Light  Co.   1st  5s, 

195  5    3,930.00 

4,000.   Monongahela  Valley  Traction  Co.   1st 

5s,  1942  ' 3,685.00 

2,000.   Ohio  Power  Co.  1st  &  Ref.  5s,  1952 1,974.00 

2,000.  Narragansett  Electric  Co.  1st  5s,  1957  1,980.00 
2,000.   Shell  Union  Oil  Corporation  5s,  1947      1,979.00 

2,000.    Koppers  Gas  &  Coke  Co.  5s,  1947 1,962.00 

1,000.    Indianapolis  Power  &  Light  Co.  1st  5s, 

1957 994.50 

1,000.   Texas  Power  &  Light  Co.  1st  Ref.  5s, 

1956    1,021.25 

1,000.   Pennsylvania  Railroad  Co.  Deb.  4J^s, 

1970    922.50 

1,000.   Pennsvlvania  Water  &  Power  Co.    1st 

5s,  1940  1,00  5.42 


treasurer's  report  63 

Stocks 

54shs.  New  York  Central  Railroad  Co $3,654.62 

125  shs.  Pennsylvania   Railroad   Co 7,638.35 

30  shs.  Lehigh  Valley  Railroad  Co. 2,1  12.50 

7  shs.  Lehigh  Valley  Coal  Corp'n.,  Pfd 23  5.39 

40  shs.  Milwaukee  Electric  Railway  &  Light 

Co-   pfd v 3,900.00 

64  shs.  American  Telephone  &  Telegraph  Co.    5,960.05 

350  shs.  Providence  Gas  Co. 5,755.68 

15  shs.  Providence  National  Bank  ) 

30  shs.  Merchants'   National   Bank   Bldg.} 1»800-00 

45  shs.  Blackstone  Canal  National  Bank 1,050.00 

52  shs.  Atchison,  Topeka   &   Santa   Fe   Rwv. 

Co.,  Common "...  6,247.85 

20  shs.  American  Power  &  Light  Co 1,696.50 

30  shs.  Standard  Gas  &  Electric  Co.  4%  Pfd.    1,906.50 
35  shs.  Public  Service  Corp'n.  of  N.    J.   5% 

Pfd 3,327.63 

10  shs.  Public  Service  Corp'n.  of  N.  J.   5% 

Pfd 990.00 

1  0  shs.  Electric  Bond  &  Share  Co.  5%  Pfd.       922.00 

„    .         .       J  84,447.62 

Cash  on  hand — $1,484.81  Inc. 

2,575.26  Princ 4,060.07 

$113,507.69 

Liabilities 

Equipment  Fund $    25,000.00 

Permanent  Endowment  Fund: 

Samuel  M.  Noyes $  1 2,000.00 

Henry  J.  Steere 10,000.00 

James  H.  Bugbee 6,000.00 

Charles  H.  Smith 5  000.00 

William  H.  Potter 3^000.00 

Charles  W.  Parsons 4,000.00 

Esek  A.  Jillson 2,000.00 

John  Wilson  Smith 1,000.00 


64  RHODE    ISLAND    HISTORICAL    SOCIETY 

William  G.  Weld   $1,000.00 

Charles  C.  Hoskins 1,000.00 

Charles  H.  Atwood 1,000.00 

Edwin  P.  Anthony 4,000.00 

John  F.  Street '  1,000.00 

George  L.  Shepley 5,000.00 

Franklin  Lvceum  Memorial  734.52 


Publication  Fund: 

Robert  P.  Brown $  2,000.00 

Ira  P.  Peck 1 ,000.00 

William  Gammell  1,000.00 

Albert  f.  Jones 1 ,000.00 

William  Ely  1 ,000.00 

Julia  Bullock 500.00 

Charles  H.  Smith 1  00.00 


$56,734.52 


6,600.00 

Life  Membership  5,600.00 

Book  Fund 3,012.41 

Reserve  Fund  974.13 

Revolving  Publication  Fund 200.95 

Surplus  13,900.87 

Surplus  Income  Account 1 ,484.8 1 


$1  13,507.69 


Providence,  R.  I.,  January  8th,  193  5. 


Respectfully  submitted, 

G.  A.  Harrington, 

Treasurer 

We  have  examined  the  securities  belonging  to  the  Society   and   find 
them  in  agreement  with  the  list  herewith. 

William  Davis  Miller 
John  H.  Wells 


Form  of  Lkgacy 


"/  give  and  bequeath  to  the  Rhode  Island 
Historical  Society  the  sum  of 
dollars." 


Koger   Williams  Press      r\Jli^ 


A.    Jill  I  X  SUN     C    u. 


im;o\  mi  \<  I 


Rhode    Island 

Historical    Society 

Collections 


Vol.  XXVIII 


JULY,  1935 


No.  3 

'■j         r~- 


Cfns  Ctcket  entitles  tlje  ftof* 

^'"^  feflor  to  fuch  Prize  as  may  be  drawn  againft  its 
J^-rNiitnber,  agreeable  to  an  Act  of  the  Legiflature, 
^ffr^s  paiTed  at  January  Seffion,  1795  ;  fubject  to  a  De- 
i       f£j       jdudion  of  Twelve  and  an  Baij  per  Cent. 

ife  I    D  ,  d^J*tJ^*\    -0    ''■■■£  t*U* 


A   RHODE    ISLAND    LOTTERY   TICKET   OF    1795 


Issued  Quarterly 


68  Waterman  Street,  Providence,  Rhode  Island 


CONTENTS 


PAGE 

A  Rhode  Island  Lottery  Ticket  of  1  795         .  .    Cover 

The  Roger  Williams  Seals  in  the  Egerton  Manuscripts 

by  James  E.  Ernst       .  .  .         .  .  65 

Proposed  Iron  Works  at  Providence 

by  Howard  M.  Chapin         ....  67 

Ships'  Protests,  1645-1696  ....  70 

Plat  of  Stanton  Purchase 80-81 

Notes 82 

The  Old  Hoyle  Tavern  (concluded) 

by  Horace  G.  Belcher  .....  83 


RHODE    ((ijffflk    ISLAND 
HISTORICAL    llOOl/f  SOCIETY 

COLLECTIONS 


Vol.  XXVIII  JULY,  1935  No.  3 

H.  Anthony  Dyer,  President         Gilbert  A.  Harrington,  Treasurer 
Howard  W.  Preston,  Secretary  Howard  M.  Chapin,  Librarian 

The  Society  assumes  no  responsibility  for  the  statements  or  the  opinions 
of  contributors. 


The  Roger  Williams  Seals  in  the 
Egerton  Manuscripts 

By  James  E.  Ernst 

Two  manuscript  letters  written  by  Roger  Williams  to 
Lady  Joan  Barrington,  of  Hatfield  Priory,  Co.  Essex,  are 
now  in  the  British  Museum,  in  the  Egerton  MSS  Coll. 
2643,  ff  3-6.  Each  of  these  two  letters  is  sealed  with  a 
different  seal.  The  seals  used  by  Mr.  Williams  on  these 
letters  differ  from  the  armorial  seal  used  by  him  in  1637- 
1638  on  letters  to  Governor  Winthrop,  of  Massachusetts 
Bay. 

On  the  letter  of  May  2,  1629,  Egerton  MSS  2643, 
ff  304,  Roger  Williams  used  an  armorial  seal,  bearing  a 
fleur-de-lis. 

On  the  undated  letter,  which  was  undoubtedly  written 
before  that  of  May  2,  1629,  Egerton  MSS  2643,  ff  5-6, 
Williams  sealed  with  a  seal  bearing  as  its  device  a  rose. 


66 


RHODE    ISLAND    HISTORICAL    SOCIETY 


The  armorial  seal  used  by  Williams  in  1637-1638,  on 
letters  to  Governor  Winthrop,  has  not  yet  been  satisfac- 
torily deciphered.  The  letters  are  printed  in  the  M.  H.  S.  C. 
4,  VI,  231-3}  242-4}  248-9}  252-3}  254-6}  266-7.  Mr. 
Howard  M.  Chapin  has  fully  discussed  the  difficulties  which 


the  seal  presents  in  a  recent  article  in  the  R.  I.  H.  S.  C, 
Vol.  XXII,  No.  3,  pp.  89  ff.  Rider's  Book  Notes,  No.  11, 
p.  109,  illustrates  the  seal  and  shows  the  lion  rampant  with 
tail  curled  outward.  Mr.  Chapin  gives  the  seal  as  "a  lion 
rampant  within  an  orle  of  nine  partly  obliterated  charges." 
If  as  Dr.  Bowditch  suggests  the  "charges"  are  "pheons," 
a  solution  of  the  ancestry  of  Roger  Williams  may  be  hoped 
for.  I  have  recently  examined  the  seals  in  the  Massachusetts 
Historical  Society  Library  and  find  that,  contrary  to  Mr. 
Rider's  statement,  the  tail  actually  turns  toward  the  body. 


PROPOSED  IRON  WORKS  67 


Proposed  Iron  Works  at  Providence 
in  1655 

The  earliest  reference  to  an  attempt  to  establish  the  metal 
trades  in  Providence  appears  in  a  letter  of  Roger  Williams 
dated  January  22,  1650-51  and  addressed  to  the  Inhabi- 
tants of  the  town  of  Providence,  in  which  he  wrote,  "I  have 
been  sollicited  and  have  promised  my  helpe  about  Iron 
worcks,  when  the  matter  is  ripe,  earnestly  desirous  everie 
way  to  further  the  good  of  the  Towne  of  Providence."1 

It  is  interesting  to  note  that  one  of  Roger  Williams' 
dreams  was  for  Providence  to  develop  into  a  manufacturing 
and  industrial  center,  a  dream  not  destined  to  accomplish- 
ment until  a  century  after  his  death. 

The  chief  promoter  of  the  scheme  for  establishing  iron 
works  in  Providence  was  Mr.  Joshua  Foote,  a  citizen  and 
iron-monger  of  London,  who  according  to  Savage2  had 
extensive  business  dealings  with  New  England  during  the 
years  1644  to  1652.  Savage  says  that  he  came  to  New 
England  in  1653  and  settled  at  Roxbury,  soon  removing  to 
Providence.  . 

He  was,  certainly  living  in  England  in  1644  and  1647 
in  each  of  which  years  he  contributed  £5  for  the  use  of  the 
Society  for  the  Propagation  of  the  Gospel  in  New  England/ 
After  his  arrival  in  New  England  he  became  associated  with 
the  manufacture  of  iron  here  and  appears  in  1653  and  1 654 
as  one  of  the  three  "commissioners  and  attorneys"  for  the 
Company  of  the  Iron  Works  at  Hammersmith4  and  Brain- 
tree  in  New  England  in  the  lengthy  lawsuits  in  the  Essex 
County  courts. 

In  June  1651a  Mr.  Foote  appears  as  surety  for  a  defend- 

^rov.  Rec.  XV,  40,  043. 
2Also  see  AspinwalPs  Notarial  Records. 

3N.  E.  H.  &  G.  R.  36,  p.  68  and  39,  p.  1  79.  E.  C.  Q.  C.  1 ,  p.  40 1 . 
4Hammersmith  is  that  part  of  Lynn  in  which  the  iron  works  were 
located. 


68  RHODE  ISLAND  HISTORICAL  SOCIETY 

ant  in  the  Essex  County  Quarterly  Court'  and  as  it  seems 
probable  this  is  Mr.  Joshua  Foote,  it  follows  that  he  came 
to  New  England  in  or  before  1651. 

In  February  1654-55  Williams  wrote:  "Mr.  Foote  has 
once  and  again  moved  for  Iron  Works  at  Providence.  He 
told  me  that  you  had  speech  with  him  about  his  getting  iron 
men  to  Pequot."  but  he  thought  yourself  would  be  willing 
to  promote  the  work  as  well  here  as  there,  and  therefore 
promised  me  to  write  to  you.  If  I  had  power  in  my  hand 
I  would  venture  to  such  a  public  good,  and  however  would 
gladly  contribute  all  assistance,  especially  if  your  loving 
spirit  and  experience  be  pleased  to  give  encouragement."' 

In  a  postscript  Williams  adds:  "Mr.  Foot  is  said  (at 
present)  to  resolve  for  the  Dutch:  upon  occasion  of  my 
declaring  against  his  man,  Mr.  Fowler's  disorderly  mar- 
riage in  Mr.  Foot's  house,  without  any  publication,  and 
upon  that  occasion  my  refusing  to  promote  the  Iron  Works 
as  yetj  he  is  displeased,  and  speaks  of  departure.  I  truly 
love  and  pity  the  man,  yet  surely  from  him  have  the  Indians 
been  furnished  with  store  of  liquors,  from  his  house  have 
the  incivilities  of  our  own  town  been  much  encouraged,  and 
much  evil  report  he  hath  incurred  about  this  marriage.  He 
saith  he  knew  not  of  it  'till  over  night.  But  (although  the 
pretended  marriage  was  not)  it  may  be  resolved  on  before 
over  night,  yet  I  am  sorry  to  hear  such  talk  in  the  town  of 
what  he  knew  before."8 

Joshua  Foote  describing  himself  as  citizen  and  "ire- 
monger"  of  London  now  resident  in  Providence  in  New 
England  on  October  2,  1655  made  his  will  which  he  signed 
with  his  mark  in  the  presence  of  William  Blackstone.  He 
made  Lieut.  Joshua  Hewes  and  Henry  Fowler  executors 
and  trustees  and  left  all  his  property  to  his  wife  and 


nN.E.  H.&G.  R.  l,p.  229. 

''New  London. 
7N.  C.  VI,  284. 
8N.  C.  VI,  286. 


PROPOSED  IRON  WORKS  69 

children."  Among  his  creditors  were  Joseph  Jenckes,  Senior, 
and  Joseph  Jenckes,  Junior,  both  iron  workers.  The  latter 
was  destined  to  start  iron  works  at  Providence  as  Foote  had 
planned  to  do. 

Foote  died  in  October,  for  on  October  31,  power  of 
administration  was  granted  to  "Lieft  Joshua  Hewes" 
(N.  E.  H.  &  G.  R.  5,  p.  444).  Apparently  Hewes  acted  in 
Massachusetts  Bay  and  Fowler  in  Rhode  Island. 

On  May  7,  1656  William  Barrows  brought  suit  against 
Henry  Fowler  complaining  that  Mr.  Foote  and  Mr.  Fowler 
had  received  sixteen  shillings  more  than  was  due  to  them 
upon  their  account.  Henry  Fowler  asked  for  time  to  have 
the  books,  now  at  Boston,  examined.10  Barrows  brought  two 
suits  against  Fowler  at  this  time,  apparently  one  against 
Fowler  personally  and  one  against  Fowler  as  "adminis- 
trator" of  Mr.  Foote's  estate. 

At  the -same  court  Samuel  Bennet  brought  suit  against 
"Henry  Fowler  as  administrator  unto  Mr.  Foote"  for 
twenty-four  shillings  damage  for  a  calf  that  was  killed  by 
Mr.  Foote's  dogs.11 

Such  are  the  meagre  facts  in  regard  to  Mr.  Foote's  pro- 
ject to  establish  iron  works  at  Providence.  As  there  are  no 
actual  references  to  iron  works  at  Providence  in  1655,  it 
has  been  generally  supposed  that  Foote's  project  did  not 
materialize. 

However,  there  are  certain  indications  which  point  to  the 
possibility  that  Foote  did  establish  iron  works  at  Providence 
between  February  1655,  the  date  of  Williams'  letter,  and 
October  1655,  the  date  of  Foote's  death. 

In  the  first  place  Foote  did  not  remove  from  Providence 
in  February  or  March  1655  to  some  other  place,  but 
remained  in  Providence  for  seven  or  eight  months  until 
his  death. 

In  1682  William  Hudson  is  described  as  "formerly  an 

9N.  E.  H.  &  G.  R.  5,  p.  444. 
10Prov.  Rec.  I,  114  and  XV,  71. 
"P.R.I,  114. 


70  RHODE  ISLAND  HISTORICAL  SOCIETY 

Apprentice  of  Joshua  Foot,"  and  is  given  leave  and  liberty 
to  buy  land  at  Providence.  At  this  same  time  Daniel  Jenckes 
was  also  given  liberty  to  abide  in  Providence  whereby  he 
may  learn  and  perfect  his  trade  of  his  brother  Joseph 
Jenckes.  Doubtless  both  Hudson  and  Daniel  Jenckes 
worked  in  Joseph  Jenckes'  forge. 

Why  should  Hudson,  an  iron  worker,  in  1682,  over 
twenty-five  years  after  Foote's  death,  be  described  before 
the  Providence  Town  Council  as  "formerly  an  apprentice 
of  Toshua  Foote,"  unless  Foote  had  actually  established 
and  operated  for  a  while  his  proposed  iron  works  at 
Providence. 

That  Foote  was  engaged  in  some  sort  of  business  while  in 
Providence  is  shown  by  the  suits  brought  in  May  1656  by 
Barrows.  That  the  suits  related  to  the  operations  of  Foote 
and  Fowler  and  not  to  the  operations  of  the  Company  of 
the  Iron  Works  in  New  England  is  shown  by  the  fact  that 
the  suits  were  against  Foote  and  Fowler  and  not  against  the 
commissioners  and  attorneys  for  the  Iron  Works  Company. 

Ships'  Protests 

For  a  sea-captain  to  appear  before  a  notary  public,  and 
swear  out  a  formal  protest  against  the  sea  and  the  wind  for 
damages  that  his  ship  has  had  the  misfortune  to  suffer, 
sounds  like  a  ridiculous  incident  in  a  musical  comedy,  yet 
such  is  actually  the  proper  legal  procedure  sanctioned  by 
centuries  of  legal  precedent  and  maritime  custom.  Sawyer,1 
writing  in  1  840,  tells  us  that'  "it  is  usual  for  shipmasters 
immediately  after  arriving  in  port  from  a  foreign  voyage, 
to  enter  a  general  protest,  to  be  extended  upon  afterwards. 
Where  practical,  it  should  be  done  before  a  notary  public. 
This  he  does,  whether  he  is  aware  of  having  sustained  any 
damage  from  perils  of  the  sea  or  not.  If,  afterwards,  either 
at  that  port,  or  at  any  other,  he  finds  that  the  ship  or  cargo 

Frederick  W.  Sawyer  in  The  Merchants''  and  Shipmasters'  Guide, 
Boston,  1840. 


ships'  protests  71 

did  sustain  damage  from  such  perils,  while  on  the  passage, 
he  may  then  extend  upon  his  general  protest." 

The  earliest  ship's  protest  on  record  in  Rhode  Island  was 
noted  in  1645  at  a  time  when  there  was  no  Vice  Admiralty 
court  in  the  colony.  John  Dolling  of  "Uncaway,"  merchant, 
and  part  owner  of  the  ship  Virgin,  then  lying  at  anchor  in 
Newport  harbor,  drew  up  a  protest,  or  "protestation"  as  he 
called  it,  on  January  4,  1 645,  in  which  he  noted  his  protest 
against  the  sailing  of  the  Virgin  in  such  an  "unseasonable 
time."  He  noted  this  protest  before  Mr.  Jeremy  Clark,  one 
of  the  magistrates,  who  had  the  sergeant  serve  the  document 
on  Thomas  Newton,  master  of  the  Virgin.  The  copy  of  the 
protest,  with  the  details  connected  with  its  delivery,  was 
entered  on  the  minutes  of  the  Quarter  Court  held  at  New- 
port on  January  6,  1645.  This  protest,  it  will  be  noted, 
preceded  the  damage  that  might  be  expected  to  occur,  and 
so  differs  in  some  respects  from  the  customary  ship's  protest. 

A  temporary  Vice  Admiralty  Court  existed  during  the 
Dutch  War  of  1653  and  1654,  after  which  the  colony  was 
without  such  a  court  for  about  forty  years.  The  next  protest, 
the  earliest  ship's  protest  in  typical  form  recorded  in  Rhode 
Island,  was  noted  during  this  period.  John  Herbert,  com- 
mander of  the  sloop  Swan,  appeared  before  John  Cogge- 
shall,  and  with  two  witnesses,  Israel  Spencer  and  John 
Harcer,  both  mariners  on  the  Swan,  noted  his  protest 
"against  the  sea,  winde  and  bad  wether  for  all  Losses." 

Curiously  enough  this  protest  was  recorded  in  the  first 
volume  of  Land  Evidences,  a  place  where  one  would 
scarcely  look  for  maritime  records.  The  explanation  seems 
to  be  that  the  colony  owned  so  few  record  books  that  the 
clerk  entered  the  protest  there  for  want  of  any  better  place 
to  record  it.  Two  more  protests  were  noted  within  the  next 
two  months,  all  three  being  noted  before  John  Coggeshall, 
General  Recorder  of  the  Colony,  and  an  Assistant.2 

No  more  protests  were  recorded  for  over  a  decade,  and 
then  on  November  30,  1689  John  Christopher,  master  of 

2The  members  of  the  upper  house  were  termed  "Assistants." 


72  RHODE    ISLAND    HISTORICAL    SOCIETY 

the  good  barque  Reserve  of  New  London,  appeared  before 
John  Coggeshall,  who  was  at  this  time  Deputy  Governor, 
and  noted  a  protest. 

These  few  scattered  protests  give  us  an  idea  of  the  hard- 
ships of  the  colonial  mariners  and  of  the  weakness  of  their 
vessels.  They  do  not,  however,  give  us  any  idea  of  the  num- 
ber of  vessels  employed  in  our  early  colonial  commerce,  nor 
any  idea  as  to  the  frequency  of  disasters. 

It  was  not  customary  in  early  colonial  days  to  enter  the 
"general  protests,"  mentioned  as  customary  in  1840,  but 
only  to  enter  protests  when  actual  damage  had  been  done. 
Even  in  that  case,  protests  were  not  always  noted,  a  condi- 
tion that  might  be  expected  from  the  irregularity  in  mari- 
time law  and  usage  that  prevailed  in  those  days. 

Ships'  protests  became  more  numerous  during  the  reign 
of  King  William  and  of  Queen  Anne,  or  at  least  more 
records  of  them  have  come  down  to  our  time.  Abstracts  of 
those  recorded  in  the  second  volume  of  Rhode  Island  Land 
Evidences  are  printed  herewith  together  with  the  four 
already  mentioned. 

Those  of  the  Two  Brothers  (1695),  the  Olive  Branch 
(1695),  and  the  Diamond  (1696),  were  sworn  before 
Samuel  Cranston  as  Assistant ;  that  of  the  Experiment 
(1695)  before  Nicholas  Carr,  Head  Warden  of  James- 
town; those  of  the  William  (1696),  and  the  Providence 
(1697)  before  Walter  Clarke,  the  Governor,  and  the  others 
from  1698  to  1704  before  Samuel  Cranston,  the  Governor. 

The  form  of  the  protest  is  changed  slightly  in  1701, 
thereafter  the  shipmaster  appearing  first  before  the  notary 
public  and  then  acknowledging  the  protest  before  the 
Governor.  *  *  *  * 

Mr  John  dolling  of  vncaway*  merchant  having  part  of,  & 
goods  in  a  shipp  lately  brought  to  Anchor  in  Nuport  Harbor 
&  being  unwilling  that  she  should  dept  in  an  unseonable 
time  drew  up  a  protestacon  And  by  the  Authoritie  of  Mr 
Jeremy  Clark  being  on  of  the  magistrates  sent  the  serjant 

3Fairfield,  Conn. 


SHIPS    PROTESTS  73 

therwth  to  the  master  of  the  sd  shipp,  who  gave  affedavitt 
this  prsent  Court  of  the  ddrie  therof  into  the  hands  of 
Thomas  Newton  Master  of  the  sd  shipp  or  vessell,  wch 
protest  the  said  John  dolling  peticoned  this  Court  to  be 
entered  into  the  Records  thereof  the  better  to  give  Evidence 
therof  to  such  whom  afterwards  it  might  further  Concern 
I  John  Dolling  of  uncaway  Merchant  doe  by  these 
presents  as  Aturney  for  John  Richbell  Merchant,  and  for 
myself,  Protest  against  the  setting  sayle  of  the  shipp  Virgin 
now  at  Anchor  in  the  Road  of  Nuport  and  doe  hereby 
deliver  that  itt  is  by  me  this  present  day  Protested  wittness 
my  hand  this  4  of  Janu:  Ano:  1645 

pr  mee  John  dolling 
Before  me  Jeremy  Clarke  the  day  &  yeare  above  written. 
Supers  To  Thomas  Newton   Master  of  the  said  shipp. 
(R.  I.C.  R.,  p.  33.) 

Newport  on  Rhod-Island  February  26th  1676. 
...  be  it  knowne  .  .  .  That ...  did  Personally  apeare  before 
me  John  Coggeshall  .  .  .  John  Herbert  Commander  of  the 
Sloope  Swan;  and  did  Alleage  ...  by  the  Testimonies  of 
these  Wittnesses  . . .  Israeli  Spencer  and  John  Harcer,  mar- 
riners  aboard  the  -  sloope  ...  on  the  13th  ..  .  being  on 
A  voyage  .  .  .  bound  for  New- York,  they  were  by  Tem- 
pestuous wind  and  seas,  and  .  .  .  Darkness  of  the  Wether 
Concurring,  forced  A  shore  upon  the  Sandy  point  of 
Monnainoy  ...  on  behalfe  of  himselfe  and  Company,  and 
alsoe  for  the  owners  of  the  -  Sloope, . . .  doth  -  Publickly  . . . 
Protest  against  the  sea,  winde,  and  bad  wether,  for  all 

Losses (R.I.  L.E.I,  128.) 

Newport .  .  .  March  28th  1677. 

.  .  .  on  the  .  .  .  Date  hereof  did  .  .  .  appear  before  mee  .  .  . 
John  Coggeshall  .  .  .  John  Goose  Comander  of  the  Ketch 
Society,  with  his  Company  .  .  .  and  doth  .  .  .  enter  their 
Protest  against  the  said  Ketch4  for  her  Insufficienty  to 

"Ketch"  is  the  name  applied  to  a  two  masted  vessel,  the  mainmast  being 
stepped  about  amidships,  and  a  shorter  mast  being  stepped  near  the  stern, 
but  there  is  reason  to  believe  that  in  the  seventeenth  century  the  term 
"ketch"  was  applied  to  small  vessels  carrying  lateen  sails. 


74  RHODE    ISLAND    HISTORICAL    SOCIETY 

indure  the  sea  ...  in  ordinary  wether  her  seames  would 
open  .  .  .  and  when  they  carryed  sayle, .  .  .  she  would  -  take 
in  soe  much  water  to  Lee-ward,  .  .  .  that  we  were  forced  to 
keepe  the  pumps  goeing  .  .  . 

John  Goose  John  Cheritrie 

signed  Passongers 

Thomas  X  Banfield  Ralfe  Blackhall 

Edward  X.  Barton  Frances  Ellis 

his  marke 

(1,136) 
Newport .  .  .  Aprill  1 1th  1677. 

...  on  the  .  .  .  Date  hereof,  did  .  .  .  Samuell  Andrews, 
Comander  of  the  Ketch  Providence,  and  did  .  .  .  Prove  by 
.  .  .  these  Wittnesses  .  .  .  John  Weeden,  John  Coe,  Thomas 
Rapere,  Marriners  aboard  the  sayd  Ketch,  that .  .  .  Samuell 
Andrews  being  on  a  Voyage  with  the  sayd  Ketch, .  .  .  bound 
for  New- York,  they  were  by  Tempestuous  wind  and  Seas, 
. .  .  and  very  firce  Raigne  Concurring,  forced  A  shore  Upon 
A  sandy  Beach,  on  Rhod-Island  .  .  .  being  open  to  the 
Otion/'  and  very  great  Brakers,  ...  on  behalfe  of  himselfe 
and  Company  .  .  .  doth  .  .  .  Protest  .  . 

John  Coggeshall,  Asst 
(1,137) 
.  .  .  We  John  Christophers  Master,  Jeffery  Christophers 
Mate  &c.  belonging  to  the  good  barque6  Reserve  of  New 
London, .  .  .  bound  from  Barbados  to  Newport .  .  .  being  at 
Sea,  On  tuesday  the  Twentie  Ninth  Day  of  October  Last 
past,  In  the  Latitude  of  Thirtie  Nine  Degrees  and  thirtie 
five  Minits  by  dead  reckoning  .  .  .  Mett  with  a  most  violent 
and  Tempestuous  storm,  .  .  .  that  wee  were  forced  to  Lye 
by  or  a  Hull,  wind  being  at  South  East.  On  Wednesday  .  .  . 
the  thirtith  day  we  were  forced  to  Scudd  with  bare  poles  in 
a  most  Violent  and  great  Sea  breaking  over  us  and  .  .  .  bare- 

5Ocean. 

6The  term  "barque"  in  the  seventeenth  century  referred  to  the  size  of 
the  vessel,  rather  than  to  the  rig,  and  usually  was  applied  to  a  small  vessel 
of  from  30  to  1  50  tons,  often  rigged  as  a  sloop. 


ships'  protests  75 

ing  away  ...  all  hogsheads  and  Casque  from  off  our  deck  . . . 
Wee  .  . .  do  . . .  Protest  and  exclaim  against  the  Seas  accord- 
ing to  Custome  . . .  thirtieth  day  of  November  One  thousand 
Six  Hundred  Eighty  and  nine  . . . 
.  .  .  John  Christophers  John  Christophers 

Geffery  Christophers  &  Jeffrey  Christophers 

Benjamin  Waters  .  . .  the  the  marke  and  seall  of 

Last  day  of  Novemb  1689  &  X 

swore  ...  to  the  truth" .  .  .  Benjamin  Waters 

John  Coggeshall  Depty  Govr:  (I,  1395) 

John  Many  of  the  City  of  New  Yorke  in  his  majtty  Prov- 
ince of  New  Yorke  in  America  marriner  Sendeth  Greeting 
...  I  the  Sd  John  Many  Mas  of  the  Sloope  two  Brothers 
belonging  to  Sd  New  York  having  According  to  Order 
navigated  Said  Sloope  from  Said  New  York  to  Surranam7 
And  thare  took  in  Lading  for  the  Sd  Citty  of  New  Yorke 
Wee  Sailled  in  Sd  Sloop  from  Perramaryber8  in  Sd  Surra- 
nam the  Second  of  November  1695  &  was  bound  directly 
for  Sd  New  York  In  the  Lattitude  of  twenty  Seven  degrees 
wee  Meet  with  A  vyolent  Storme  wind  at  west  &  west  south 
west  Shifting  Against  to  A  Every  point  of  the  Compos 
Raysed  A  greatt  sea  which  Roked  us  fore  And  Aft  Shifting 
our  goods  in  the  hold  In  so  much  that  wee  had  Like  to  have 
bene  foundred  And  all  most  without  hope  of  Saving  Sd 
vessell  And  our  Lives  And  doe  feare  that  damage  is  done 
to  the  goods  in  the  hold  the  which  Said  storme  held  us 
Neare  three  weeks  In  fifty  two  days  from  Sd  port  in 
Surranam  wee  Made  the  Land  of  Marthers  Vinard  being 
durty  weather  wee  came  to  Anchor  the  next  Morning  heav- 
ing up  or  Anchor  it  breake  of  in  the  Shank  Near  the  Cross 
wee  Stood  for  the  westward  the  wind  blowing  very  hard  & 
durty  weather  wee  Came  to  Anchor  under  nomans  Land  in 
the  Night  the  wind  Luning  wee  Indevered  to  way  in  So 
doeing  of  which  our  Cable  broke  then  wee  Stood  Away  for 

7Surinam  or  Dutch  Guiana  in  South  America. 
8  Paramaribo. 


76  RHODE    ISLAND    HISTORICAL    SOCIETY 

Rhoad  Island  where  wee  Arrived  the  twenty  forth  Day  of 
this  Instant  without  Any  Anchor  So  that  what  Damage  is 
Done  to  the  sd  vessell  And  goods  was  through  the  voyalance 
of  the  wind  &  sea  tharefore  I  Doe  protest  Against  the  Same 
as  being  the  ocation  thareof  Christopher  phogland  Mate  of 
Sd  vessell  Stephen  vallue  Mark  forentine  Peter  Virgroe 
foremastmen  Doe  Mannifest  And  declare  to  the  truth  of 
All  the  Above  Written  And  Doe  heare  by  protest  with  Said 
master  ...  In  testamony  of  which  with  the  Sd  Master  & 
Mate  have  heare  unto  Subscribed  our  Names 

John  Manny     Mr 

Christopher  phogland     mate 

Stephen  vallau 

Marke  fullintine 
his  X  marke 
The  Above  Sd  John  Many  Mr  Christopher  phogland  mate 
Stephen  vallue  Marke  florintine  Peter  virgoe  foremastmen 
belonging  to  the  Sd  Sloope  two  brothers  on  their  Sollom 
Engagment  Declared  the  truth  of  what  Above  Written 
Dated  Newport  on  Rhoad  Island  Desembr:  25th  1695 

Samll  Cranston  Ast  (11,29) 
. . .  Wee  Benjamin  Brittman  of  Salam  in  the  province  of  the 
Massathusets  Bay  ...  of  New  England  Marriner  &  Master 
of  the  Barque  Ollive  Branch  belonging  to  Sd  Salam  And 
Jeames  Hardy  of  Sd  Salam  Marriner  And  Mate  of  Sd 
vessell  And  John  Tapley  Boatswain  of  Sd  vessell  In  behalfe 
of  our  Selves  And  the  Rest  of  the  Company  doth  . . .  declare 
that  being  at  the  Island  of  barbados  And  bound  with  Said 
vessell  for  Sd  Salam  Saylled  from  thence  the  Seventh  day 
of  november  Last  past  And  Stod  for  or  designed  port  of 
Salem  Afore  Sd  on  the  Second  Day  of  this  Instant  being 
then  in  the  Lattitude  of  34  degrees  50  minnitts  Came  up 
A  violent  Storme  of  winde  at  west  South  west  Shifting  &c 
which  Raised  A  greatt  Sea  &  the  next  morning  betwene  six 
And  Seven  A  clock  on  the  Shift  of  the  wind  to  North  west 
the  Sea  took  our  vessell  on  the  Larbord  Side  filled  our  Mast 
And  Shifted  the  goods  in  the  hold  wee  feare  to  the  greatt 


ships'  protests  77 

Damage  of  the  Same  tharefore  wee  as  Afore  Sd  Doe 
heareby  mannifest  or  protest  Against  the  Sea  as  being  the 
Ocation  thareof  Wittness  our  hands  in  newport  .  .  .  Afore 
Sd  whare  wee  Arived  the  27th  of  Desembr  1695  .. . 

Benja  Bickman9 
Jeames  Hardy 
JohnTapley  (11,30) 
...  be  it  know  .  .  .  that  on  the  sixteen  day  of  desembr  .  .  . 
1695  ..  .  Richard  Willy  And  Danll  Hobart  Comander  & 
Master  of  the  Ship  Experiment  of  Barbados  Burden  one 
hundred  And  Six  tunns  or  thare  Abouts  plantation  Built 
Came  before  mee  Nicholas  Carr  hed  wardding  of  the  town 
of  Jeames  town  on  the  Island  Connott  in  the  Govrment  of 
Rhoad  Island  .  .  .  And  they  Declared  unto  mee  that  on  the 
fifteenth  day  of  this  Instant  they  Sett  Sayle  from  Rhoad 
Island  laden  with  horses10  provitions  And  Lumber  bound 
for  Barbados  And  on  the  Same  day  About  two  or  three  of 
the  Clock  After  none  being  of  of  the  Beaver  Taile  Som- 
thing  to  the  Northward  which  is  A  point  of  dangres  Rocks 
Lying  Southward  from  Sd  Island,  And  being  pritty  nigh  In 
with  Sd  Shore  with  the  wind  at  north  north  west  A  Small 
Gayle  the  Sd  wind  dyed  Away  at  once  And  Emediately 
breaced  up  at  South  East  filled  all  their  Sailes  A  back  whare 
upon  they  Emediately  Braced  their  Sailes  to  the  wind  And 
kept  their  boat  A  head  for  feare  of  mistaying,  Stays  with  the 
helpe  of  which  their  Said  Ship  Stayed  &  their  they  filled 
their  Sailes  with  their  Starboard  Tack  on  bord  Still  keeping 
their  boat  Ahead  Indevouring  to  Stand  Of  Shore  but  the 
wind  being  So  Small  &  the  Swell  of  the  Sea  heaving  Into  the 
Shore  that  notwithstanding  their  boat  being  Ahead  their 
Sd  Ship  Could  not  gitt  Steredgeway  but  drove  into  the 
Shore  then  they  Lett  Run  An  Anchor  &  hailed  up  their 
Sailes  but  the  water  being  Deepe  their  Anchor  Came  home 
Although  they  veried  out  Cable  with  All  dexterity  &  Expe- 
dition possible  but  the  Anchor  Still  Draging  home  their  Sd 

"Bickman  in  acknowledgment. 

10Cf.  note  1,  page  7  of  Sanford  Papers,  published  by  R.  I.  Hist.  Society. 


78  RHODE  ISLAND  HISTORICAL  SOCIETY 

Ship  Cast  in  betwene  two  Rocks  it  being  About  halfe  ebb 
whare  their  Sd  Ship  Emediately  grounded  &  About  five 
O  clock  After  None  their  Sd  Ship  Bildged  on  the  Sd  Rock 
And  filled  their  Sd  Ship  with  water  which  caused  hir  to  fall 
over  on  hir  Starbord  bildge  which  drownded  All  their 
horses  Exsept  Six  which  Swimed  on  Shore  Thare  fore  the 
Sd  Richard  Willy  &  Danll  Hobart  Above  Sd  Requested 
mee  the  fore  Sd  head  warding  of  the  town  of  Jeamestown 
Afore  Said  to  make  this  publique  Instrument  of  protest .  .  . 
Whare  upon  I  the  Said  head  warding  . . .  doe  protest  Against 
the  Shifting  of  the  wind  &  Swelling  of  the  Sea  for  All  Costs 
Losses  And  damages  . . .  Sustained  by  Marchts  And  Owners 
of  the  Sd  Ship  &  goods  on  bord  of  Said  Ship  as  the  Onely  & 
Sole  Cause  And  Ocation  thare  of  And  not  Otherwise  In 
testamony  whare  of  I  have  heare  unto  Sett  my  hand  & 
affixed  my  Seall  .  .  . 

Swarn  before  mee 

Nicholas  Carr  Warden    X 
Johnathan  Pemberton  Mate 

Jacob  Conklyn  botsswaine  Nathanll  Townsend 

Caleb  Wheller  Carpertor  Ambros  Langley 

Thomas  Wiggen  frances  Kittring 

Thomas  Rimington  Samuell  Broston 

Samll  Stevens  Robart  Ashford    (II,  33) 

.  .  .  Wee  under  Written  belonging  to  the  Sloope  Called  the 
dimond  whare  of  Nicholas  Ingolsbey  is  Commander  now 
Riding  In  the  harbor  of  Newport  in  Rhoad  Island  from  the 
Island  of  Barbados  which  Sd  Sloope  was  Laded  in  the  Sd 
Island  of  barbados  .  .  .  about  the  Midded  of  Apriell  Last 
past  &  putt  in  A  porster  Ready  to  Saile  for  the  Owner 
Intrest  and  fraiters  Advantage  but  by  the  Restraint  of 
princes  &  Authority  of  kingly  power  the  Sd  Sloope  was 
Imbarqued  In  the  Road  of  the  Sd  Island  of  barbados  foure 
Munths  or  more  with  hir  lading  on  bord  in  which  time  wee 
Judge  that  thare  may  be  Considerable  Damage  to   the 


ships'  protests  79 

frayters  in  their  good  And  for  our  Security  from  Damage 
that  belong  to  the  Sd  Sloope  And  Cargo  Doe  According  to 
Law  in  Such  Cases  provided  make  .  .  .  this  our  Publick 
protest  Against  the  Restraint  of  Authority  in  the  Sd  Islands 
by  kingly  power  of  Imbargue  into  the  Publicq  Records  of 
the  Collony  of  Rhoad  Island  .  .  .  for  All  Damages  that  wee 
have  Sustained  ...  by  Reason  as  Afore  Sd  Attested  under 
our  hands  before  Authority  this  1 5th  day  of  August 
1696... 

Nich  Ingoldby  Master 

Robart  Lad  Mate 

John  Clarke 

Henry  X  Halbord  his  marke    (11,45) 

These  are  to  Certifie  .  .  .  that  wee  underwritten  Aron  Beale 
Commander  of  the  Ship  the  William  of  Boston  in  New 
England  Burthen  100  tunns  or  thare  Abouts  Richard 
Jeames  Mate  And  Zachariah  Hill  Boatswains  of  Sd  Ship 
doe  heareby  Declare  that  being  on  our  present  voyage  from 
the  Island  of  Jemeco11  in  the  Sd  Ship  William  bound  to  the 
port  of  boston  Afore  Sd  &  being  in  the  Lattitude  of 
1 8  degrees  or  thare  Abouts  wee  Sprung  A  leake  which  Con- 
tinued tollerable  untill  Arriving  in  the  Latitude  of  38  or  39 
Degrees  our  Sd  Leake  so  Increased  by  Reason  of  Stress  of 
weather  that  at  Length  it  proved  in  Supportable  &  perrilous 
&  tharefore  for  preservation  of  Lives  Ship  and  goods  wee 
ware  constrained  to  put  into  this  port  of  Newport  on  the 
Eight  Instant  to  the  truth  whare  of  wee  have  heare  unto 
Sett  or  hands  this  ninth  day  of  August  1 696 

Aron  Beale 
Richard  Jeames 
Zachariah  Hill 
Sollomly  Deposed  before  the  Honerd  Govr  of  Rhoad 
Island12  Walter  Clarke     (II,  55) 


^Jamaica. 

12Danll  Vernon  and  John  Mumford  signed  as  witnesses.  The  witnesses 
were  not  on  the  voyage,  but  were  residents  of  Newport. 


$>J*/»f 


JM). 


4?j 


lc 


j(c 


1  %«*££ 


JK. 


loo  <S\.d>* 


&J£ 


(&Z&J&jU'<* 


3° 


r  *t 


•>*% 


*°?^f 


'*>-" ?lf<> 


to 


3*}  j>fc 


<?ej? 


z£*& 


tim 


& 


ft 


r* 


jCeiJS 


yr 


4*i 


&& 


'    0.* 


I? 


PLAT   OF   ST 

(Reduced 

A  SCALE  BEARING  THE  NAME    [fS ]    EAS 

ON  THE   PLAT  JUST  P.ELO 
Pt 


u 


& 


2.4e-£^lc<t*S 


Z/nS    <<$W 


)***• 


ft 


2ffy 


*L*4»4 


JJL 


'^-4K 


f/>J^ 


alJnft 


te 


♦  .*«; 


J8B; 


f^^-4: 


\Sd<*t&t 


9L 


m*t<f  /Q9-f-.  otfr&i   ^^c<^/  tdz o&is  tJSf.**^ 


[JRCHASE 

ie-half) 

VEYOR,  AND  THE  DATE    173  5    IS  PASTED 
AST  LINE  OF  WRITING 

o  the  Society  by  Miss  M.  Lizzie  Kenyon 


82  RHODE  ISLAND  HISTORICAL  SOCIETY 


Notes 

An  illustrated  article  on  Old  Newport  Houses  by 
William  K.  Covell  appeared  in  Old  Time  New  England 
for  April  1935. 

The  Bulletin  of  the  Rhode  Island  School  of  Design  for 
April  1 93  5  contains  an  illustrated  article  on  Samuel  Vernon, 
Newport  silversmith,  by  Dorothy  N.  Casey. 

The  Harris  Smith  Records,  a  series  of  almanacs  annotated 
with  vital  records,  has  recently  been  presented  to  the  Society 
by  Albert  B.  Coulters.  These  records,  largely  relating 
to  Washington  and  Kent  Counties,  have  been  arranged 
alphabetically  and  typewritten  for  the  convenience  of 
genealogists. 

The  following  persons  have  been  elected  to  member- 
ship in  the  Society: 

Miss  Susan  S.  Brayton  Mr.  Tracy  W.  McGregor 


THE  OLD  HOYLE  TAVERN  83 

The  Old  Hoyle  Tavern 

By  Horace  G.  Belcher 

(Continued  from  April  issue) 

It  was  a  gala  day  for  the  opening  of  the  old  tavern  under 
its  new  owner.  William  Greene  of  Warwick  was  then  Gov- 
ernor; Jabez  Bowen  of  Providence  was  Lieutenant  Gov- 
ernor; Henry  Ward  of  Newport,  Secretary  of  State;  Wil- 
liam Channing  of  Newport,  Attorney  General;  Joseph 
Clarke  of  Newport  was  General  Treasurer.  The  Census  of 
1782  had  shown  a  population  of  4,306  persons  for  Prov- 
idence, including  1913  white  males,  943  of  them  under  the 
age  of  16;  2102  white  females,  903  under  16  years;  6 
Indians,  22  mulattoes,  252  blacks. 

Col.  Joseph  Hoyle  is  described  in  the  deed  as  "yoeman" 
the  common  term  for  one  not  a  man  of  property  and  con- 
clusive proof  that  he  was  not  then  an  innkeeper.  He  came 
to  the  tavern  with  the  tradition  of  two  generations  of  inn- 
keepers behind  him — his  grandfather,  Dr.  John  Hoyle  and 
his  father,  James  who  in  Dr.  Hoyle's  will  had  been  di- 
rected to  "assist  his  mother  in  her  business,  her  paying  him 
for  it,"  after  the  death  of  Dr.  Hoyle.  He  must  have  been 
a  man  of  unusual  parts,  to  have  left  such  an  indelible  im- 
press of  his  personality  and  popularity  on  the  tavern  in  the 
13  years  he  remained  its  landlord,  that  succeeding  land- 
lords retained  his  name  on  its  sign  to  the  end,  nearly  a 
century  later.  They  might  and  many  of  them  did,  put 
their  own  name  on  the  sign,  but  always  it  was  subordinated 
to  the  old  name,  the  Hoyle  Tavern  or  later,  the  Hoyle 
Hotel. 

Col.  Joseph  Hoyle,  son  of  James  and  grandson  of  John, 
was  born  in  Providence  in  1741.  He  married  Sarah  Field 
of  Providence,  October  26,  1774,  the  minister  being  Rev. 
Joseph  Snow  of  the  Beneficent  Congregational  Church,  the 


84  RHODE  ISLAND  HISTORICAL  SOCIETY 

old  "Round  Top."  He  had  been  landlord  of  the  Hoyle 
Tavern  more  than  a  year  when  on  July  8,  1 784,  he  married 
Patience  Rogers,  then  the  widow  Manchester,  the  ceremony 
being  performed  in  North  Providence  by  Hope  Angell, 
justice  of  the  peace. 

This  marriage  was  recorded  1 5  years  later  in  1  799  after 
Col.  Hoyle  had  given  up  the  tavern.  The  marriage  record 
as  made  by  George  Tillinghast,  Town  Clerk,  included  a 
list  of  the  children  of  that  marriage,  with  dates  of  birth 
of  each  one.  The  time  and  manner  of  the  record  makes  it 
appear  a  measure  to  establish  legal  rights  of  the  wife  and 
children  in  his  estate.  Hoyle  retired  at  56  and  was  59  when 
he  died. 

Col.  Hoyle  made  the  Hoyle  Tavern  the  leading  one  on 
the  west  side  of  the  town  where  taverns  were  numerous, 
especially  on  the  road  which  now  is  Westminster  Street, 
and  one  of  the  best  known  and  most  popular  houses  in  the 
colony.  He  retired  in  February,  1796,  after  13  years  as  its 
host,  and  was  succeeded  by  Jeremiah  Fenner. 

Hoyle  died  insolvent,  four  years  later,  in  1800.  His 
widow  sold  her  rights  and  dower  in  the  property  May  22, 
1  80 1 ,  to  Mary  Arnold,  daughter  of  Welcome  Arnold,  who 
later  married  Tristam  Burgess,  a  well  known  lawyer  of 
Providence  and  Representative  in  Congress  from  1825  to 
1835.  The  property  remained  in  the  Burgess  family  until 
the  Citizens  Savings  Bank  bought  it  for  $75,000,  June  30, 
1919. 

Jeremiah  Fenner  rented  the  inn  from  Joseph  Hoyle,  in 
February,  1796  and  left  in  the  latter  part  of  1797.  There 
is  no  record  of  any  other  innholder  here  for  the  next  six 
years  until  Col.  Cyrus  Spaulding  took  it  over  in  April,  1  803 
from  the  new  owners.  He  had  previously  kept  a  tavern 
at  the  head  of  Long  Wharf,  at  the  foot  of  the  present 
Dorrance  Street. 

Col.  Spaulding  stayed  but  a  year  at  the  Hoyle,  removing 
in   1804  to  the  house  of  Joseph  Sabin  at  the  sign  of  the 


THE  OLD  HOYLE  TAVERN  85 

Golden  Ball,  two  doors  West  of  the  Great  Bridge.  The 
Golden  Ball  seems  to  have  been  a  popular  name  for  Prov- 
idence taverns,  for  there  have  been  three  here,  as  well  as 
others  just  outside  the  town. 

From  1  804-  to  1807  the  Hoyle  was  run  by  Joseph  Angell. 
He  left  in  1807  and  the  tavern  was  again  advertised  for 
rent.  It  stood  empty  five  years  this  time,  for  it  was  not 
until  1812  during  our  second  war  with  Great  Britain,  that 
Joseph  Witter  became  *its  landlord.  He  stayed  six  years, 
leaving  in  1  8 1  8  to  open  a  house  over  the  corner  of  Wey- 
bosset  and  High  Streets. 

The  Hoyle  Tavern  was  advertised  a  number  of  times 
between  1816  and  1820,  even  during  Witter 's  tenancy, 
until  Caleb  Allen  became  its  landlord  in  1  820.  He  stayed  a 
year  and  was  followed  in  1821  by  Preston  H.  Hodges,  a 
well  known  innkeeper  who  kept  it  until  1827,  when  he  left 
to  carry  on  the  Franklin  House  on  Market  Square,  1827  to 
1 832,  with  his  son.  Seth  Baker  succeeded  him  at  the  Hoyle 
in  1828  and  kept  it  for  three  years,  removing  April  15, 
1 83 1,  to  a  tavern  on  the  opposite  side  of  High  Street. 

After  that,  landlords  changed  often.  John  Burton  kept 
there  from  1831  to  1834;  William  Capron  1834  and  per- 
haps 1835;  Owen  Burlingame,  who  came  from  Scituate, 
1835  to  1837.  Burlingame's  license  was  dated  April  6, 
1835. 

Somewhere  about  this  time  a  third  story  was  added  to 
the  tavern,  which  originally  was  of  two  stories.  Much  later 
in  the  century  an  ell  was  built  on,  with  a  barroom  on  the 
lower  floor.  This  addition,  made  about  the  Centennial  year, 
1876,  increased  its  capacity  to  45  rooms,  12  of  them  being 
in  the  ell.  This  new  ell  was  in  odd  contrast  to  the  old  house, 
for  the  lines  of  the  original  structure  were  wavy  and  any- 
thing but  straight,  while  the  newer  part  was  angular  and 
square  with  modern  windows  and  doors. 

From  the  front  the  structure  appeared  but  two  stories 
high  to  the  casual  glance,  for  a  long  porch  with  six  white 
pillars   extended   along   the    front   of  the    second   story, 


86  RHODE  ISLAND  HISTORICAL  SOCIETY 

reached  from  the  open  square  in  front  by  two  broad  nights 
of  steps  at  each  end  and  in  the  centre.  A  short  distance 
in  front  of  this  was  a  long  hitching  rail  for  horses.  In  later 
years  a  large  horse  watering  trough  was  located  in  front. 
A  circular  stone  trough  still  stands  there. 

"The  main  stairway  is  quite  as  queer  in  its  formation 
as  the  building  itself,"  says  an  old  description  of  the  Hoyle 
as  it  was  in  1888.*''  "The  balustrade,  or  banisters  as  it  was 
then,  is  of  the  slight,  ugly  style,  the  stairs  narrow  and  of 
low  tread  and  great  care  has  to  be  exercised  in  going  up 
alone,  for  fear  of  hitting  one's  head  on  some  of  the  sup- 
posed artistic  projections  or  ornaments. 

"As  one  looked  at  it,  the  question  naturally  comes  up  as  to 
how  many  thousands  have  climbed  those  stairs,  how  many 
joyous  supper  parties  have  passed  up  and  down,  how  many 
honest  farmers  have  rested  there  after  a  day  of  busy  barter 
and  trade  in  the  city  and  how  many  who,  in  the  barroom 
below  have  drank  not  wisely  but  too  well,  have  been  aided 
up  the  steep  way  by  the  attendants  of  the  house. 

"Looking  from  the  front  of  the  stairway  toward  the  rear 
of  the  building,  the  main  hall  or  corridor  is  an  odd-looking 
passage  with  innumerable  jogs  and  projections,  each  room 
that  opens  on  it  having  a  corner  sticking  out,  handy  to  fall 
against  in  the  night  and  equally  hazardous  for  anyone  to 
pilot  by  in  the  daytime,  unless  in  full  control  of  his  powers. 

"Apparently  this  floor  was  not  planned  at  all,  but  the 
rooms  were  simply  thrown  at  the  building  and  stuck. 

"Ascending  the  main  stairway,  a  narrow  corridor  runs 
back  to  the  annex  and  looking  down  it,  the  utter  impossi- 
bility of  taking  a  big  trunk  through  it  at  once  apparent, 
while  even  a  bridal  couple,  closely  as  they  walk  together, 
would  have  to  proceed  in  single  hie. 

"Leading  from  this  to  the  floor  above,  is  a  curiously 
built  winding  stairway  that  would  make  an  excellent  study 
for  an  artist.  It  is  even  worse  to  climb  than  the  lower  stair- 
way, being  only  half  as  wide  and  twice  as  steep. 

20  Providence  Sunday  Journal,  January  29,  1888. 


THE  OLD  HOYLE  TAVERN  87 

"The  windows  in  the  room  and  halls  are  antique  in  the 
extreme,  the  panes  of  glass  being  small  and  more  or  less 
dirty,  while  they  are  set  in  heavy  wood  and  look  from  the 
outside  almost  like  windows  in  a  prison.  Many  of  them  are 
the  ones  originally  put  in,  but  some  are  of  modern  size  and 
style  and  look  much  out  of  place  among  their  ancient 
fellows." 

The  procession  of  innkeepers  continued,  with  frequent 
changes.  The  old  tavern  had  much  competition  and  its 
days  of  long  tenancy  ended  with  the  death  of  Martha 
Brown,  in  1778.  John  A.  Foster  took  it  over  in  1838  and 
left  it  three  years  later,  in  1841,  to  open  a  grocery  store. 

About  this  time  the  old  Hoyle  began  to  be  known  as  the 
Hoyle  Hotel  instead  of  as  the  Hoyle  Tavern.  Christopher 
Johnson,  who  had  managed  the  Angell  House,  the  Frank- 
lin House  and  later  the  Washington  Hotel,  and  perhaps 
the  old  Baker  Tavern  on  High  Street,  was  its  landlord 
from  1841  to  1843. 

It  was  on  the  last  day  of  December,  1843,  that  Amasa 
Sprague,  of  the  great  cotton  manufacturing  family  whose 
failure  three  decades  later  was  a  world  event  in  that  indus- 
try, was  murdered — a  crime  which  brought  about  the  abol- 
ishment of  capital  punishment  in  Rhode  Island. 

"One  of  the  legends  of  the  Hoyle,"  says  the  old  account 
previously  quoted,30  "is  that  Nick  Gordon,  instigator  of  the 
murder  of  Amasa  Sprague  the  elder,  came  to  the  tavern  on 
the  night  of  the  murder  and  bought  drinks  for  the  crowd 
several  times,  and  kept  talking  about  what  time  it  was  and 
how  long  he  had  been  there,  thus  laying  a  foundation  for 
an  alibi  in  case  he  was  suspected  of  the  murder." 

Charles  Richards  had  the  place  from  1844  to  1847,  fol- 
lowed by  Lynson  Barney,  1847  to  1848.  Barney  came  to 
the  Hoyle  from  the  High  Street  Hotel,  which  he  kept 
from  1844  to  1846.  Later  he  removed  to  Newport  and 
became  proprietor  of  the  United  States  Hotel.  Samuel  B. 

30  Ibid. 


88  RHODE    ISLAND    HISTORICAL    SOCIETY 

Parker  followed,  1848  to  1852;  John  Colwell,  1853  to 
1 855  or  '56;  and  then  came  Sidney  S.  Paul,  one  of  the  most 
colorful  personalities  ever  connected  with  a  Rhode  Island 
hotel. 

Sidney  Paul  prided  himself  on  good  ale  and  always  had 
half  a  dozen  barrels  on  tap  at  the  Hoyle.  He  used  to  say 
he  could  feed  100  persons,  day  or  night,  on  good  roast 
beef  and  other  things,  and  on  occasion  he  maintained  this 
reputation.  He  also  kept  the  Roger  Williams  Hotel,  which 
stood  next  to  the  Providence  Washington  building  where 
North  Main  Street  runs  into  Market  Square,  and  subse- 
quently kept  the  Earle  House  at  the  corner  of  North  Main 
and  Steeple  Streets. 

After  leaving  the  Hoyle  in  1 859,  he  opened  a  road  house 
on  the  Apponaug  road  just  East  of  the  present  Warwick 
Avenue  in  what  now  is  Lakewood,  which  for  many  years 
after  he  passed  on,  was  still  called  the  Sidney  Paul  place. 

John  Boyden,  who  bought  him  out  at  the  Hoyle  in  1 859, 
later  opened  the  first  shore  resort  on  the  East  side  of  the 
Providence  River,  about  where  the  Wilkesbarre  coal  pier 
was  later  located.  His  name  was  given  to  Boyden  Heights, 
a  well  known  clam  dinner  resort  in  East  Providence  near 
Riverside.  Boyden  died  in  1864  and  his  widow,  Jane  Boy- 
den, carried  on  at  the  Hoyle  until  1867 — the  second  woman 
to  take  charge  of  the  old  hostelry. 

The  line  of  landlords  continued  with  Jenckes  Harris, 
1868-1869;  he  was  followed  by  Orren  Harris  (Agent), 
1870.  Harris  was  noted  for  his  hot  whiskey  punches.  Then 
came  Amos  Wells,  1871  to  1874;  Benjamin  S.  Wilbur, 
1875-1876;  Orrin  Harris  again,  1877-1878;  Thomas 
Ladd,  1879-1882;  Thomas  Hartshorn,  1883.  The  line 
of  landlords  ended  with  William  W.  Cameron,  1884-1887. 
Cameron,  whose  name  is  on  the  sign  shown  in  the  last 
photograph  of  the  tavern  doing  business,  removed  from 
the  city  in  1887.  The  Providence  Directory  does  not  list 
any  proprietor  after  1886,  the  year  Providence  celebrated 
the  250th  anniversary  of  the  founding  of  the  city. 


THE  OLD  HOYLE  TAVERN  89 

The  old  house  had  29  landlords  between  1739-40  and 
1886.  Of  these  29  innholders,  two  were  women,  their 
tenancy  being  1 1 1  years  apart.  One  of  these  women,  Martha 
Brown,  widow  of  the  founder  of  the  tavern,  had  the  longest 
tenancy  of  any — a  full  quarter-century. 

The  old  house  had  successively  been  a  stage  coach  and 
farmer's  inn;  a  popular  house  to  which  the  young  bloods 
of  the  town  resorted;  a  farmer's  hotel ;  and  a  neighborhood 
barroom.  Always  it  retained  its  popularity  with  horsemen 
and  back  country  farmers.  It  fell  in  repute  in  its  later 
days  and  it  ended  as  a  lodging  house  for  families,  with 
rooms  let  to  lodgers  who  took  their  meals  elsewhere. 

Some  of  the  best  known  hotel  keepers  of  the  town  and 
city  had  it  for  longer  or  shorter  periods,  with  varying  for- 
tunes. One  of  its  proprietors  hanged  himself  in  the  little 
entry  leading  from  his  private  sitting  room  to  his  bedroom. 
Always  it  remained  the  Hoyle — a  landmark,  the  best 
known  place  on  the  East  side  of  Providence. 

For  many  years  a  pair  of  large  scales  stood  in  front  of 
the  Hoyle,  where  hay  and  other  bulky  commodities  were 
weighed.  These  scales  were  provided  with  big  weights 
which  Ben  Olney,  the  noted  weight  master,  threw  around 
as  if  they  were  specially  made  for  him.  He  would  announce 
the  weight  with  as  much  care  as  if  weighing  diamonds. 

"But  to  see  Ben  in  his  glory,  was  to  see  him  when  a  big 
load  of  wood  was  to  be  measured,"  says  an  old  account.31 
"Then,  indeed,  he  owned  the  place.  All  measuring  was 
done  with  a  yard  stick  and  the  care  that  Ben  took  with  a 
fraction  of  an  inch,  was  a  wonder  to  the  small  boys  and  a 
delight  to  his  friends. 

"For  many  years  the  farmers  used  to  tie  up  in  front  and 
around  the  Hoyle  and  barter  their  produce  for  what  they 
needed  and  this  made  the  junction  a  most  lively  place. 
Inside  the  hotel,  faro  bank  was  often  dealt  and  it  was  an 
easy  matter  to  start  a  poker  game  at  any  time. 

"One  day  a  farmer  drove  up  with  a  load  of  cherries  and 
31  Ibid. 


90  RHODE  ISLAND  HISTORICAL  SOCIETY 

left  them  guarded  by  a  savage  looking  dog.  Alf  Barton, 
one  of  the  characters  of  old  Christian  Hill,  was  there 
and  remonstrated  with  the  farmer  for  leaving  them  with 
only  the  dog  to  guard  them — but  the  farmer  allowed  the 
dog  was  enough  and  said  anyone  who  could  drive  him  away 
could  have  the  cherries. 

"That  was  enough  for  Alf  and  before  the  farmer  had 
gone  any  distance,  by  the  aid  of  a  squirt  gun  and  some  hot 
water,  he  had  routed  the  dog  and  divided  the  cherries 
among  those  near  by." 

For  many  years  a  large  tree  stood  on  the  High  Street 
side  of  the  hotel.  In  this  one  of  the  proprietors  built  a 
platform  20  feet  above  ground,  railed  off  for  security  and 
on  the  platform  placed  tables  and  chairs.  In  summer  this 
made  a  cool  and  airy  place  for  service  from  the  bar. 

"From  its  start  until  within  a  few  years,  it  was  a  hostelry, 
open  24  hours  daily.  Now  it  is  used  as  a  lodging  house  for 
families  and  rooms  are  let  to  boarders  who  take  their  meals 
elsewhere,"  says  an  old  newspaper  description  of  the  place 
in  its  last  days.3" 

"The  famous  old  kitchen  is  deserted  and  silent,  no  juicy 
steaks  are  cooked  there,  no  steaming  coffee  emerges  from 
its  portals  and  the  famous  dishes  of  ham  and  eggs  and  won- 
derful boiled  dinners  that  used  to  be  served  there,  are  no 
more  known. 

"With  the  increase  of  population  and  the  growth  of 
building  on  the  West  Side,  the  functions  ceased  and  grad- 
ually but  surely  it  settled  into  a  relic  of  the  past  and  'The 
Hoyle'  sank  to  the  level  of  an  ordinary  building,  only 
known  by  the  fact  that  it  stood  at  the  junction  of  High 
and  Cranston  Streets. 

"Probably  no  tavern  of  olden  times  or  hotel  of  later 
years  has  so  many  stories  connected  with  it.  The  Hoyle 
was  once  the  leading  road  house  of  the  town.  East  Side 
bloods  used  to  drive  out  to  it,  for  there  were  few  buildings 

32  Ibid. 


THE  HOYLE  TAVERN  ABOUT  1887 

Part  of  the  tavern's  stable  can  be  seen  at  the  left. 
From  fhotografh  owned  by  Horace  G.  Belcher 


92  RHODE  ISLAND  HISTORICAL  SOCIETY 

on  the  hill  and  it  was  considered  quite  a  distance  from  the 
centre  of  the  city.  There  was  no  bridge  across  the  now 
Providence  River  and  to  reach  the  Hoyle  required  quite 
a  drive  out  toward  Pawtucket." 

This  newspaper  account  lists  some  of  the  proprietors  of 
the  old  Hoyle,  including  several  whose  names  do  not 
appear  in  the  list  of  annual  license  holders.  Among  them 
was  Walt  Proctor,  of  whom  the  reporter  said:  "Walt  Proc- 
tor is  best  known  to  this  generation,  for  he  and  his  heirs 
have  owned  it  for  16  or  18  years  and  still  hold  it.  His 
noted  motto  of  'Live  and  Let  Live'  is  known  everywhere. 
He  died  at  the  Hoyle." 

There  is  no  record  of  any  license  issued  for  the  Hoyle 
in  the  name  of  W7alter  Russell  Proctor,  although  he  died 
there  September  29,  1  883,  his  home  being  then  at  42  Wil- 
low Street.  He  certainly  had  the  leasehold  of  the  place  at 
the  time  of  his  death,  for  an  account  in  the  Providence 
Journal  October  1,  1883 — a  few  days  after  his  death — of  a 
row  at  the  Hoyle,  said  the  property  was  in  control  of  Walter 
Proctor.  He  probably  held  license  through  a  dummy  or  his 
bartender,  as  was  often  done  where  a  license  could  not  be 
obtained  direct. 

The  old  tavern  building,  with  its  additions,  its  barn 
and  other  buildings  erected  on  the  original  land,  stood 
until  1  890  when  it  was  sold  at  auction  June  1  8.  The  Hoyle 
Tavern  itself  brought  $16,  a  condition  of  sale  being  its 
removal  within  30  days.  The  addition  to  the  older  struc- 
ture sold  for  $98  and  seven  other  buildings  including 
barns,  on  the  property  brought  the  total  up  to  $1156. 
The  big  stable  was  on  the  Cranston  Street  side,  in  the  rear 
of  the  main  building,  which  faced  the  point  of  the  junction. 

The  old  tavern  was  replaced  by  a  store  and  office  build- 
ing of  two  stories  on  the  Westminster  and  Cranston  Street 
sides,  with  a  front  section  facing  the  square,  of  three 
stories.  This  structure  was  vacated  March  1,  1920  fol- 
lowing purchase  of  the  property  by  the  Citizens  Savings 
Bank  and  was  removed  to  make  way  for  the  present  home 


THE  OLD  HOYLE  TAVERN  93 

of  the  bank,  opened  July  1,  1921,  just  six  months  more 
than  half  a  century  after  the  bank  was  established  as  a 
Christian  Hill  institution. 

The  estate  had  remained  in  possession  of  the  Burgess 
family  and  descendants  from  1  801  until  1  893  when  it  was 
conveyed  to  the  Burges  Land  Company,  Casimir  DeR. 
Moore,  President ;  Alfred  H.  Cumbers,  Treasurer  by  Cas- 
imir DeR.  Moore  and  Harriet  F.  Moore,  his  wife,  both 
of  New  York  City;  Charles  E.  Souther  and  Mary  Burges 
Souther,  his  wife,  both  of  Orange,  New  Jersey,  the  date 
being  February  18.  It  was  described  as  numbers  5-43 
Cranston  and  878-900  Westminster  Street. 

The  Citizens  Savings  Bank  bought  from  the  Burges 
Land  Company,  June  30,  1919,  paying  $75,000  for  the 
property  which  when  sold  at  auction  June  5,  1889  by 
George  H.  Burnham,  Commissioner  in  the  case  of  Casimir 
DeR.  Moore  of  New  York  vs.  Andrew  S.  Thorp  for  parti- 
tion of  estate,  had  been  passed  for  a  bid  of  $41,100  for  "all 
that  certain  lot  of  land  with  the  buildings  thereon  and 
appurtenances  thereto,  situated  at  the  junction  of  High 
and  Cranston  Streets  .  .  .  known  as  the  Hoyle  Tavern 
estate  .  .  .  about  28,137  square  feet  of  land." 


JOSEPH    HOYLE  S   MARRIAGES 

Joseph  Hoyle  was  33  when  he  married  Sarah  Field, 
daughter  of  Joseph  Field,  October  26,  1 774,  in  Providence. 
The  marriage  was  performed  by  Rev.  Joseph  Snow,  who 
recorded  it  in  the  ledger  account  he  kept  of  the  many  mar- 
riages he  performed  as  minister  of  the  Beneficent  Congre- 
gational Church. 

The  record,  as  transcribed  in  Book  5,  page  482,  of  the 
Record  of  Marriage  and  Births,  office  of  the  City  Registrar, 
Providence,  reads:  "Joseph  Hoyle  of  Providence,  son  of 
James,  Sarah  Field  of  Providence,  daughter  of  Joseph, 
October  26,  1774." 


94  RHODE  ISLAND  HISTORICAL  SOCIETY 

There  is  no  record  of  the  death  of  Sarah  Hoyle,  but  on 
page  128,  Book  2,  of  Record  of  Marriages  and  Births  in 
the  City  Registrar's  office,  Providence,  is  a  photostatic 
copy  of  the  page  in  the  original  record  hook,  with  the  entry 
of  his  second  marriage. 

The  date  was  July  8,  1  784,  but  the  record  was  not  made 
until  March  30,  1  799,  when  it  was  entered  with  a  list  of  the 
children  born  to  the  couple  from  that  marriage.  The  bride 
was  Patience  Rogers,  then  the  widow  Manchester.  The 
record  reads: 

"I  hereby  certify  that  Mr.  Joseph  Hoyle,  son  of  Mr. 
James  Hoyle,  deceased,  and  Miss  Patience  Manchester, 
widow  of ( line  drawn  here  in  original  record )  Man- 
chester, deceased,  were  lawfully  joined  together  in  Mar- 
riage in  North  Providence  the  eighth  day  of  July,  anno 
Domine  1784.  By  me,  the  subscriber,  Hope  Angell,  Justice 
of  Peace.  Witness  George  Tillinghast,  Town  Clerk.  March 
30,  1799. 

"Their  children,  born  in  Providence,  are  as  follows,  to 
wit: 

Elizabeth  Stuart  Hoyle,  Born  August  15,1785 
Joseph  Hoyle,  Jr.,  Born  December  7,  1  786 
James  Rogers  Hoyle,  Born  February  27,  1788 
Henry  Ward  Hoyle,  Born  February  5,  1790 
Susannah  Hoyle,  Born  November  20,  1791 
John  Singer  Dexter  Hoyle,  Born  April  3,  1798" 
While  the  record  of  the  marriage  gives  the  name  of  the 

bride  as  Patience  Manchester,  widow  of Manchester, 

deceased,  the  index  to  this  volume  in  the  same  handwriting 
as  the  entries  in  the  volume,  reads: 

"Hoyle,  Joseph  and  Patience  Rogers,  their  Marriage 
and  children's  Births  128." 

Evidently  the  Town  Clerk  had  known  the  bride  before 
her  first  marriage.  Joseph  Hoyle  at  the  time  of  this  mar- 
riage was  43  years  old.  He  was  58  when  his  last  child  was 
born  two  years  after  he  retired  from  the  Hoyle  Tavern 
and  two  years  before  he  died  insolvent. 


THE  OLD  HOYLE  TAVERN  95 


JOHN    HOYLE  S   WILL 

John  Hoyle's  death  was  recorded  in  the  Register  of 
King's  Church,  now  St.  John's  Church,  North  Main  Street, 
in  Providence.  The  record,  transcribed  in  Book  5,  page  164 
of  the  Register  of  Births,  Deaths  and  Marriages,  City 
Registrar's  office,  Providence,  reads:  "John  Hoyle  buried 
February  11,  1766."      * 

In  his  will,  "John  Hoyle  of  Cranston  in  the  County  of 
Providence"  left  all  lands  and  buildings  in  Cranston  to 
his  wife,  Hannah. 

His  son,  James  Hoyle,  father  of  Joseph,  received  all 
lands  in  Cranston  after  decease  of  "his  mother  in  law, 
Hannah  Hoyle,  deceased."  The  will  continues  with  the 
injunction  that  James  "is  to  assist  his  mother  in  her  bus- 
iness, her  paying  him  for  it." 

The  "toomb  yard  at  the  North  corner  of  my  land  fenced 
in  with  a  prim  hedge"  is  excepted,  the  document  continuing 
"and  my  will  is  that  the  aforesaid  burying  place  shall  be 
keepst  for  a  borying  place  for  my  three  children  namely, 
John  Hoyle,  James  Hoyle,  Elisabeth  Mounting  formerly 
Elisabeth  Short  all  to  have  the  privilege  and  liberty  to 
bury  their  dead  if  need  require  and  my  son  Richard's  chil- 
dren the  same  privilege  and  so  to  their  posterity  hereafter." 

He  left  1 5  pounds  to  "the  town  of  Cranston  treasury" 
to  maintain  the  graveyard. 

To  his  son  John  was  left  "the  East  end  of  my  house  in 
Providence  where  he  now  lives,  that  is  to  say  wright  up 
and  down  from  the  yard  to  the  top  of  the  chimne  between 
the  two  ends  of  said  house  and  the  land  under  the  said 
end  of  said  house." 

The  West  end  of  the  house  was  left  to  his  grandson 
Richard  Hoyle,  with  "1-2  the  barn." 

His  silver  mounted  "sword  and  cain"  was  left  to  his  son 
James  "and  my  string  of  gold  beeds  and  locket  to  my 


96  RHODE  ISLAND  HISTORICAL  SOCIETY 

daughter  Elisabeth  and  all  my  wearing  apparel  to  be  di- 
vided between  my  two  sons  John  and  James  Hoyle." 

Following  the  disposal  of  his  clothing  came  this  clause: 

"And  further  my  will  is  that  children  should  be  loving 
each  other  and  to  their  mother  and  she  the  same  to  them  and 
I  would  pray  that  they  would  think  that  their  poor  Mother 
and  Father  had  no  Body  to  give  any  thing  to  them  and 
that  I  have  labored  hard  to  get  a  few  pence  for  them  and 
hope  God  will  bless  them  with  the  same." 

The  inventory,  showing  2887  pounds  10  shillings  old 
tenor,  was  made  by  Richard  Waterman,  Thomas  Westcott, 
Alexander  Frazier. 

In  Book  W-5,  Page  41 1,  Providence  Probate  Records. 

The  inscriptions  on  the  Hoyle  gravestones  were  printed 
in  The  Rhode  Island  Historical  Society  Collections ,  vol. 
XXV,  p.  1 1 2  and  an  illustration  of  the  coat  of  arms  in  vol. 
XXI,  p.  73. 


Form  ok  Legacy 


"/  give  and  bequeath  to  the  Rhode  Island 

Historical  Society  the  sum  of 

dollars. " 


Rogi  r  Williams  Press        ^U^ 


£ 


E.  A.  Johnson  Co. 


IMUIVIDl   N(  1 


Rhode    Island 

Historical    Society 

Collections 


Vol.  XXVIII         OCTOBER,   1935 


No.  4 


THE  SEAT  OF  PORTSMOUTH,  R.  I.  OF    1  807. 

(recently  discovered) 


Issued  Quarterly 


68  Waterman  Street,  Providence,  Rhode  Island 


CONTENTS 


PAGE 

Seal  of  Portsmouth Cover 


Narragansett  Bay  and  Dee  River,  1583 

bv  Fulmer  Mood         .  .  .  .  .  97 


The  Stanton  Purchase 

by  Susan  Stanton  Brayton     .  .  .  .  101 

Ships' Protests,  1697-1700         ....  110 

The  date  of  Roger  Williams'  birth       .  .  .  112 

New  Publications  of  Rhode  Island  Interest  .  .  115 

Notes 116 


Chief  Big  Thunder 

by  Edmund  B.  Delabarre     .  .  .  .        116 


RHODE 
HISTORICAL 


ISLAND 

SOCIETY 


COLLECTIONS 


Vol.  XXVIII  OCTOBER,  1935 


No.  4 


H.  Anthony  Dyer,  President         Gilbert  A.  Harrington,  Treasurer 
Howard  W.  Preston,  Secretary  Howard  M.  Chapin,  Librarian 


The  Society  assumes  no  responsibility  for  the  statements  or  the  opinions 
of  contributors. 


Narragansett  Bay  and  Dee  River,  1583 

By  Fulmer  Mood 

In  a  recent  publication  the  statement  has  been  made  that 
Sir  Humphrey  Gilbert's  projected  colony  of  Norumbega 
was  to  be  established  on  the  shores  of  Narragansett  bay.  An 
official  document  of  1583  is  produced,  evidencing,  it  is 
asserted,  that  the  Elizabethan  designation  for  Narragansett 
bay  was  "Dee  river."  According  to  the  same  source,  there  is 
to  be  found  along  the  coast  to  the  westward  of  Dee  river 
"the  ryver  of  Norumbeage."1  To  test  these  geographical 
assertions  is  the  aim  of  this  note. 

The  technical  adviser  on  whom  Gilbert  was  at  this  time 
leaning  heavily  was  John  Dee,  a  Welsh  polymath  the  pro- 
fundity of  whose  learning  easily  merits  that  doctorate  which 


1William  B.  Goodwin,  "The  Dee  River  of  1583  (Now  called  Narra- 
gansett Bay)  and  Its  Relation  to  Norumbega,"  in  Rhode  Island  His- 
torical Society  Collections  (Providence,  1934),  XXVII  (No.  2), 
pp.  38-50. 


98  RHODE  ISLAM)   HISTORICAL  SOCIETY 

hasty  writers  too  frequently  bestow  upon  one  whom  con- 
temporaries greeted  as  "Master."" 

The  document  of  1583  already  mentioned — it  is  a  deed 
from  Gilbert  to  Sir  George  Peckham — informs  us  that  the 
port  is  called  Dee  river  by  Dee  himself.  That  is  to  say, 
he  was  responsible  for  so  naming  it.  Reading  further  in  the 
document,  we  learn  more  of  this  river  or  harbor  to  which  it 
had  pleased  the  scholar  to  affix  his  name:  "Dee  Ryver  which 
Ryver  by  the  discripcion  of  John  Verarzanus  a  Florentyne 
lyeth  in  Septontrionall  latitude  about  fortye  twoo  degrees 
and  has  his  mouth  lyinge  open  to  the  South  halfe  a  league 
brode  or  there  aboute  and  enteringe  Within  the  saide  Baye 
betweene  the  Easte  and  the  Northe  encreaseth  his  breadith 
and  contynueth  twelve  leagues  or  there  abouts  and  then 
maketh  a  gulfe  of  twentie  leagues  compasse  or  thereabouts 
and  conteyneth  in  it  selfe  five  small  Islandes  newlie  named 
the  Cinque  Isles."3 

This  description  is  sufficiently  detailed  to  give  rise  to  a 
natural  inference  in  the  mind  of  modern  students  that 
Gilbert,  when  he  made  the  grant,  and  when  he  so  described 
a  portion  of  the  territory  he  was  conveying,  based  his  action 
upon  a  map  then  in  his  possession.  Certainly  one  can  hardly 
escape  the  feeling  that  Gilbert  had  ready  at  hand  some  aid 
from  which  he  took  the  particulars  concerning  the  five  isles 
and  the  run  of  the  shore  line,  all  the  descriptions  of  which 
he  incorporated  into  his  legal  instrument.  It  is  a  natural 
inference,  to  repeat,  that  the  hypothetical  source  for  this  is 
a  map.  But  no  time  need  be  lost  searching  for  cartographical 
evidence  bearing  on  the  point,  because  there  is  waiting  to  be 
brought  into  the  discussion  a  document  which  without  ques- 
tion is  Gilbert's  source. 

Speaking  of  an  American  region  on  the  coast  in  about 

-The  role  of  John  Dec,  a  neglected  factor  in  the  history  of  English 
expansion  in  late  Tudor  times,  has  lately  been  clarified  by  E.  G.  R.  Taylor 
in  Tudor  Geografhy,  1485-1  583  (London,  1930).  Prof.  Taylor  devotes 
three  chapters  to  Dee's  work. 

3Goodwin,  of.  cit.y  p.  43. 


NARRAGANSETT  BAY  AND  DEE  RIVER,    1583  99 

41  °  30'  north  latitude  a  chronicler  writes:  "[This  country] 
lyeth  East  and  West,  I  say  that  the  mouth  of  the  hauen 
lyeth  open  to  the  South  halfe  a  league  broade,  and  being 
entred  within  it  between  the  East  and  the  North,  it  stretch- 
eth  twelue  leagues:  where  it  waxeth  broder  and  broder,  and 
maketh  a  gulfe  about  20.  leagues  in  compasse,  wherein  are 
fiue  small  Islandes  very  fruitfull  and  pleasant,  full  of  hie 
and  broade  trees,  among  the  which  Ilandes,  any  great 
Nauie  may  ryde  safe  without  any  feare  of  tempest  or  other 
daunger."4  These  words  were  written  by  the  author  of 
Verrazano's  narrative  (who  may  have  been  Verrazano  him- 
self) and  they  were  in  print  in  English  as  early  as  the 
summer  of  1582.  The  younger  Hakluyt  had  translated 
Verrazano's  narrative  and  published  it  in  his  little  book, 
Divers  Voyages,  a  work  which  was  in  large  part  designed  as 
a  handbook  for  the  Gilbert  venture  in  colonization.  To 
apply  the"  method  of  textual  comparisons  is  to  certify  that 
the  excerpt  just  given  is  the  source  of  the  description  incor- 
porated in  the  grant  to  Peckham. 

The  recognition  of  this  circumstance  alters  the  approach 
to  the  solution  of  the  problem  concerning  the  location  of 
Dee's  river.  If  Gilbert  had  Verrazano's  account  in  his  hand, 
and  incorporated  that  navigator's  description  of  a  bay  on 
the  Atlantic  coast,  then  the  identification  of  that  bay  depends 
upon  a  scrutiny  of  Verrazano's  narrative.  But  the  identifica- 
tion must  be  made  in  accord  with  certain  facts  supplied  by 
the  grant  to  Peckham.  The  most  pertinent  of  these  is  the 
information  that  the  river  of  Norumbega  lies  to  the  west- 
ward of  the  Dee  river  or  port. 

It  is  true  that  Verrazano's  narrative  describes  a  large 
river  which  lies  to  the  west  of  his  harbor  already  mentioned. 
But  this  river  of  Verrazano's — in  which  it  is  easy  to  see  the 

4R.  Hakluyt,  Divers  Voyages  (London,  1582),  sig.  B4  verso — sig.  B5 
recto.  The  general  term  by  which  Hakluyt  describes  this  part  of  the 
coast  is  "Morum  bega."  He  writes  it  as  two  words.  He  informs  the 
reader,  in  a  marginal  note  at  the  top  of  sig.  B,  recto,  of  "The  Country  of 
Sir  H.  G.  voyage."  Verrazano's  letter  is  reprinted  in  Chapin's  Docu- 
mentary History  of  Rhode  Island  (Providence,  1919),  Vol.  2,  Chapter  I. 


100  RHODE   ISLAND   HISTORICAL  SOCIETY 

Hudson — bears  no  name.  Gilbert  obviously  did  not  derive 
the  name  of  the  river  of  Norumbega  from  that  source.  He 
must  have  derived  this  term,  too,  from  some  readily  avail- 
able authority.  Why  not  from  his  technical  adviser? 
Master  John  Dee  at  this  time  had  in  his  possession  a  map 
of  North  America,  and  prominently  displayed  on  this  map 
in  the  central  sector  of  the  Atlantic  coast  is  the  term 
"Norumbega.""  The  country  of  Norumbega,  as  this  map 
plainly  shows,  is  traversed  through  the  middle  by  a  large 
river  which  rises  far  in  the  interior.  This  stream  can  hardly 
be  anything  other  than  the  "river  of  Norumbega."  It  may 
with  confidence  be  taken  to  be  the  Hudson.  Concerning  the 
several  openings  and  indentations  on  the  coast  to  the  east- 
ward of  this  river's  mouth,  no  statement  need  be  hazarded 
except  that  the  shore  line  which  it  is  intended  to  represent 
is  undoubtedly  the  littoral  of  southern  New  England. 

If  then  the  river  of  Norumbega  as  shown  on  Dee's  map 
and  the  large  river  visited  by  Verrazano  just  before  reach- 
ing Narragansett  bay  are  to  be  understood  as  one  and  the 
same  river,  and  if  this  may  be  taken  as  the  Hudson,  a  vital 
condition  for  the  identification  of  Dee's  river  is  satisfied. 
The  legal  instrument  informs  us  that  west  of  the  harbor  of 
Dee  is  the  river  of  Norumbega.  And  Narragansett  Bay  is 
certainly  in  a  proper  relation  to  the  Hudson,  by  this 
construction. 

As  the  present  writer  reads  Verrazano's  narrative,  he  is 
satisfied  that  the  bay  with  the  five  isles  in  it  corresponds  to 
Narragansett  bay,  and  that  the  river  of  Norumbega  which 
lies  to  the  west  of  it  is  the  Hudson. 


"British  Museum,  Manuscript  Room:  Cottonian  MS,  Aug.  I,  i,  art.  1. 
There  is  a  description  of  this  map  in  A  Catalogue  of  the  Manuscripts, 
Maps,  Charts,  and  Plans  ...  in  the  British  Museum  (London,  1844), 
I,  p.  30.  The  map  has  been  reproduced,  with  some  loss  of  its  original 
sharpness  of  definition,  in  Hakluyt,  Principal  Navigations  (Glasgow, 
1904),  VIII,  facing  p.  486. 


THE    STANTON     PURCHASE  101 


The  Stanton  Purchase 

By  Susan  Stanton  Brayton* 

On  August  22,  1662,  the  Indian  Sachem  Wannumachon 
deeded  to  Robert  Stanton  and  George  Gardiner  a  tract  of 
land  five  miles  long  by  one  and  a  half  miles  wide,  between 
the  rivers  Westototucket  and  Ashuniunck,  or  adjoining  the 
Pettaquamscutt  Purchase.  These  rivers  are  now  called 
Usquepaug  and  Beaver  Rivers,  and  the  land  thus  deeded, 
the  Stanton  Purchase. 

In  recording  the  history  of  this,  as  of  any  piece  of  land, 
one  may  resort  to  several  sources  for  information — topo- 
graphical, documentary,  and  traditional — supplementing 
them  by  the  recollections  of  the  oldest  inhabitant. 

The  road  recently  improved,  Route  R.  I.  2,  called  the 
South  County  Trail,  affords  a  convenient  means  of  explor- 
ing this  bit  of  back  country,  hitherto  known  to  few.  The 
trail  enters  the  Purchase  where  it  crosses  the  Usquepaug 
River  into  Richmond  over  a  new  concrete  bridge.  It  then 
traverses  the  Great  Plain  in  a  westerly  direction  j  climbs  a 
low  hill;  swerves  to  the  south;  and,  skirting  Great  Swamp, 
finally  reaches  the  Pawcatuck  River  at  Kenyon. 

The  two  rivers  which  bound  the  Purchase  on  the  east  and 
west  flow  in  a  general  southerly  course.  The  Usquepaug  is 
a  sluggish  stream,  cutting  a  meandering  channel  through 
bogland,  and  beyond  the  bridge  is  lost  in  the  thick  growth 
of  Great  Swamp;  Beaver  River  on  the  west,  no  longer 
frequented  by  the  beaver  builders  which  gave  it  its  name, 
flows  more  swiftly  through  leafy  woodland  and  sunny 


♦Authorities  have  been  named  except  for  statements  about  the  Boss 
Meeting  House  which  were  taken  from  the  minutes  of  the  Sunday  School 
Convention. 

The  author  has  drawn  upon  her  memory  of  the  locality  and  the  story  of 
its  history  as  related  by  her  mother,  also  upon  Miss  Kenyon's  reminis- 
cences, and  Clarke  and  Marchant  papers. 


102  RHODE  ISLAND  HISTORICAL  SOCIETY 

meadows,  luring  fishermen  by  its  promise  of  trout.  It  drains 
the  valley  at  the  foot  of  Shannock  and  School  House  Hills 
and,  like  the  Usquepaug,  empties  into  the  Pawcatuck.  For 
further  exploration  one  should  drive  along  the  old  dirt 
road  branching  from  the  trail  just  beyond  the  bridge,  which 
leads  to  the  village  of  Usquepaug;  also  another  old  road, 
forking  from  the  trail  and  descending  the  hill  into  Beaver 
River  valley  and  the  Shannock  Purchase  beyond. 

As  to  documentary  sources,  one  of  great  importance  has 
recently  come  into  the  possession  of  the  Rhode  Island  His- 
torical Society  through  the  gift  of  Miss  M.  Lizzie  Kenyon 
of  Richmond.  This  is  an  ancient  map,  or  survey  of  the 
Stanton  Purchase,  within  the  boundaries  of  which  Miss 
Kenyon  has  spent  her  life,  upon  land  acquired  by  a  Peterson 
ancestor,  her  great-great-grandfather,  over  two  hundred 
years  ago.  By  her  father's  purchase  of  the  Stanton  farm 
adjoining,  she  is  also  the  owner  of  land  occupied  for  many 
generations  by  descendants  of  Robert  Stanton,  one  of  the 
original  purchasers  from  the  Indian  Wannumachon. 

The  old  map,  drawn  in  ink  upon  thick  parchment,  yellow 
with  age,  measures  fifteen  by  twenty-four  inches.  It  has 
apparently  always  been  tightly  rolled  and  kept  within  the 
iron  ring  encircling  it  when  it  was  presented  to  the  Society. 
It  is  illustrated  in  the  July  1935  issue  of  the  Collections. 
A  description  of  the  map,  written  beneath  it,  reads  as 
follows: 

A  Draught  of  a  Neck  of  Land  between  Bever  River  and 
Awooscopauge  River  Belonging  to  Jno  Stanton  &  Joseph 
Gardner  Containing  4116  Acres  More  or  Less  besides  the 
200  Acres  to  Joseph  Clark  and  the  Undivided  Medow  as 
twas  Surveyed  In  March  1693-4  att  their  Request  with 
others  with  them,  Concerned, 

pre  Me  J^hn  Smith  Surveyor 

Drawn  by  A  Scale  of  80  Rods  to  an  inch  p.  J.  S. 

A  True  Coppey  Taken  of  the  OReginal 

Drawn  by  John  Smith  Surveyor 

By  Me  ye  5th  5mo  Calle  July 


THE    STANTON     PURCHASE  103 

Below  this  description  a  paper  scale  is  attached,  headed: 

S Easton    Surveyor      173-. 

(  Samuel   ?  1735-?  ) 

This  map,  then,  drawn  in  1735  exhibits  the  Purchase  as 
surveyed  in  1693-4  and  shows  that  its  principal  owners 
were,  at  that  time,  Daniel  Stanton,  John  Stanton,  Benjamin 
Green,  Joseph  Gardner,  the  Heir  of  Marthe  Barber,  Daniel 
Long  Bottom  and  Henry  Tippits  (?).  There  were  also 
four  unassigned  lots  north  of  Benjamin  Green's  portion. 

The  Undivided  Meadow  and  Joseph  Clarke's  200  Acres 
lay  at  the  extreme  south-east  and  south,  the  entire  Purchase 
having  the  Pawcatuck  River  as  its  southern  boundary. 

Joseph  Clarke  was  the  son  of  Joseph  Clarke  and  the 
nephew  of  Dr.  John  Clarke,  brothers  who  emigrated  from 
England  and  settled  in  Aquidneck  in  1638.  They  were 
mentioned  in  the  Charter  of  1663  which,  indeed,  Dr.  John 
Clarke  was  largely  instrumental  in  securing  from  His 
Majesty,  Charles  II.  The  second  Joseph  Clarke,  owner  of 
the  200  Acres,  was  the  first  town  clerk  of  Westerly  and  held 
this  position  from  1669  to  1700. 

A  curious  old  book  is  extant  in  which  Joseph  Clarke 
entered  the  town  records,  attested  by  Joseph  Pendleton, 
town  clerk,  on  April  28,  1702,  as  a  "Vera  Coppia"  of  the 
records  in  the  "old  towne  book." 

As  the  town  records  filled  only  a  portion  of  the  thick, 
parchment-covered  folio,  Joseph  Clarke  and  his  descend- 
ants thriftily  used  the  remaining  pages  for  bookkeeping 
and  other  purposes.  Thus  it  became  a  chronicle  not  only  of 
the  town  meetings  of  old  "Westerle"  but  also  of  the  trans- 
actions of  the  Clarke  family.  In  this  book  we  find,  "April  9, 
1 694,  Voated — That  whereas  Joseph  Clark  Sen.  had  2 
hundered  accers  of  land  granted  by  the  towne  and  it  fell 
within  the  purchase  of  Robert  Stanton  and  sd  Clark petioned 
the  towne  that  he  might  have  his  lot  grante  still  according 
to  lot:  it  is  granted." 

Joseph  Clarke  did  not  apparently  find  this  sufficient  to 
establish  his  right  to  the  land  in  question,  for  on  June  21, 


104  RHODE   ISLAND   HISTORICAL  SOCIETY 

1694,  he  secured  by  the  payment  of  "ten  pounds  current 
money  of  New  England"  a  deed  to  the  200  acres.  This 
deed,  still  in  existence,  exhibits  the  stilted  legal  phraseology, 
of  the  period.  It  states  in  part:  "Wee  the  said  John  Stanton 
&  Joseph  Gardiner — Doe  give  grant  Bargaine  Sell  Alien 
Enfeoff  and  Confirme  unto  the  Said  Joseph  Clarke  his  heirs 
and  assigns  forever  the  Southwestward  part  of  a  Neck  of 
land  Scittuate  lying  in  the  Narragansett  Cuntry  between  a 
River  Cald  Awooscopaug  River  and  a  River  Cald  Bever 
River  the  which  said  South  west  part  of  Said  Neck  Contains 
two  hundred  Acres  More  or  Less  as  is  now  laid  out  And 
Diliniated  on  the  Drauft  of  Said  Neck  And  bounded  South- 
wardly on  the  great  River  Comonly  Caled  pawcatuck  River, 
Westwardly  on  said  Bever  River  Northerly  And  Esterly 
on  Lands  belonging  to  Said  John  Stanton  &  being  part  of 
Said  Neck,  j  the  which  Said  Neck  of  land  Was  formerly 
purchased  of  Wanamachin  Sachim  &  owner  thearof  by 
Robert  Stanton  father  of  Said  John  Stanton  And  George 
Gardiner  father  of  Said  Joseph  Gardiner." 

This  deed  was  signed  and  witnessed  in  the  presence  of 
Benedict  Arnold,  and  recorded  June  24,  1694,  in  the 
"towne  book"  by  Joseph  Clarke. 

On  January  4,  1717,  Joseph  Clarke  executed  a  deed 
reading,  "To  my  son  Samuel  Clarke  200  acres  in  Westerly 
bounded  by  the  Pawcatuck,  and  west  by  Beaver  River, 
north  and  east  by  land  formerly  of  John  Stanton  and 
Joseph  Gardiner,  which  tract  has  been  improved  upwards 
of  2 1  years  by  my  son  Samuel,  he  being  in  actual  possession 
of  same  for  term  aforesaid" 

Samuel  Clarke  was  made  justice  of  the  peace.  A  leaf 
attached  by  pins  to  Joseph  Clarke's  book  contains  the  rec- 
ords of  ten  marriages  performed  by  him  between  Novem- 
ber 1724  and  October  1729.  He  is  thought  to  have  built 
the  house  now  standing  on  the  estate  of  Mrs.  Fred  W. 
Marvel  at  the  foot  of  School  House  Hill,  near  Beaver 
River. 


THE    STANTON     PURCHASE  105 

The   family  genealogy  of  this  branch   of  the   Clarke 
family  is  as  follows: 

Joseph  Clarke  1642-3  —  1726-7 

Samuel  Clarke  1672      —  1 769 

Joseph  Clarke  1705      —1783 


I  I 

Samuel  Clarke  Died   1 792    Joshua  Clarke    1  733  —  1 8 1 8 

l 
Samuel  Clarke   1771  —  1851 

Mrs.  Marvel  is  the  great-granddaughter  of  the  last 
named  Samuel  Clarke.  He  inherited  the  estate  of  his  uncle, 
Samuel  Clarke,  who  died  childless,  and  finally  possessed 
over  500  acres  of  land,  the  greater  part  lying  within  the 
Stanton  Purchase.  For  many  years  a  justice  of  the  peace, 
he  was  generally  known  as  Squire  Clarke. 

The  original  200  acres  of  Joseph  Clarke  finally  passed 
into  the  hands  of  strangers.  In  1773  on  September  14, 
Christopher  Champlin  "purchased  of  Joseph  Clarke  of 
Richmond  One  Hundred  and  fifty  acres  of  Land  being  a 
part  of  said  Clarke's  Homestead  Farm  lying  in  said  Rich- 
mond" and  signed  an  agreement  stating  that  the  said  Joseph 
Clarke  and  his  family  should  "forever  have  liberty  to  Bury 
their  Dead  on  said  Farm  at  the  common  Burying  Place, 
without  any  Molestation." 

This  burial  place,  which  defines  the  location  of  the 
Champlin  purchase  as  within  the  200  acres,  may  be  seen  as 
one  approaches  the  village  of  Kenyon  from  the  north,  on 
the  right  hand  side  of  the  South  County  Trail. 

In  an  unfenced  field,  under  a  large  oak  are  several  graves 
in  the  neglected  grass,  indicated  by  rough  blocks  of  field 
stone.    One  is  marked  S.  C.    It  is  probably  the  grave  of 
Samuel  Clarke  who  died  in  1769.    Two  bear  inscriptions, 
which  may  be  deciphered  thus: 
Joshua  Clarke 
Died  December  27,  1818 
85  yr.   7  mos 


106  RHODE  ISLAND   HISTORICAL  SOCIETY 

Dorcas  Clarke  Died 
Sept.  28,  1811 
Age  69,  8  mos. 

The  fact  that  these  two  graves  were  thus  marked  may  be 
due  to  a  clause  in  the  will  of  Joshua  Clarke,  drawn  in  1815. 

"I  order  my  Excutor  to  git  two  tombstones  for  Me  and 
my  wife  with  our  name  and  age  ingraven  on  them." 

The  part  of  the  200  acres  bordering  upon  the  Pawcatuck 
is  now  the  site  of  Kenyon,  which  became  a  prosperous  mill 
village  during  the  nineteenth  century  through  the  success- 
ful management  of  Elijah  Kenyon.  Upon  the  main  street 
stands  a  beautiful  colonial  house,  said  to  have  been  built  by 
members  of  the  Clarke  family  in  1735. 

In  the  late  eighteenth  and  early  nineteenth  centuries  the 
Marchant  family  acquired  over  500  acres  in  the  heart  of  the 
Stanton  Purchase,  on  what  was  known  as  the  Great  Plain. 
Henry  Marchant,  first  district  judge  of  Rhode  Island,  had 
in  1775  bought  a  farm  of  lS]/2  acres  bordering  on  the 
Usquepaug  River  in  South  Kingstown ;  a  year  later,  118 
acres  across  the  river  in  Richmond.  His  son,  Judge  William 
Marchant,  inherited  this  land.  In  1803  Joseph  Durfee  sold 
to  William  Marchant  for  $1,600  land  in  Richmond  pur- 
chased by  Durfee  from  Hopson  Willcox,  bounded  easterly 
by  Uskapaug  River,  southerly  and  westerly  by  land  of 
Ichabod  Peterson  and  Robert  Stanton,  northerly  by  Peter 
Boss  and  William  Marchant,  a  highway  running  through 
said  farm. 

A  map  drawn  of  this  region  previous  to  the  year  1825 
shows  the  holdings  of  William  Marchant,  Ichabod  Peter- 
son, John  Stanton,  Perry  W7atson,  Peter  Boss,  and  the 
Herrington  and  Hoxie  families,  west  of  the  river,  and  the 
farms  of  Marchant,  Tanner,  Clarke,  Willcox,  and  Babcock 
east  of  the  river,  in  South  Kingstown. 

The  house  then  owned  by  Perry  Watson  still  stands  at 
the  top  of  the  hill  beyond  the  home  of  Miss  Kenyon — the 
old  Peterson  farm.  It  later  came  into  the  possession  of 
Peter   Clarke,   son   of   Peter   Clarke    of   Shannock    Hill, 


THE    STANTON     PURCHASE  107 

descendant  of  William  Clarke,  one  of  the  original  settlers 
of  the  Shannock  Purchase. 

Beyond  the  Perry  Watson  house  to  the  south  stood  the 
Boss  Meeting  House.  The  Baptist  society  owning  this 
place  of  worship  was  organized  in  1773  by  nine  men  and 
ten  women,  who  met  in  private  homes  for  several  years. 
Their  communion  set  consisted  of  two  "puter"  platters  and 
two  beaker  glasses.  Elder  Boss  preached  to  the  little  con- 
gregation. In  1787,  on  a  lot  of  land  containing  half  an 
acre,  deeded  by  Perry  Watson  and  his  wife  for  £1 :  10,  a 
modest  edifice  36  by  28  feet,  without  a  steeple,  was  built  for 
$310.  In  1809  there  were  eighty  members,  the  deacons 
being  John  Stanton,  Wait  Clarke,  and  Gardiner  Moore. 

The  organization,  though  often  without  a  pastor,  pros- 
pered, especially  under  the  ministration  of  the  Rev.  John 
H.  Baker,  son-in-law  of  Judge  Marchant,  also  one  of  its 
staunch  supporters.  The  worshippers  usually  came  to 
church  on  horse  back,  if  not  on  foot.  Two  services  were 
held,  necessitating  the  bringing  of  noon  day  lunches,  which 
were  often  taken  to  the  Peterson  home  and  there  enjoyed, 
accompanied  by  neighborhood  gossip. 

In  1855  a  new  church  was  erected  in  Charlestown  near 
Clarke's  Mills,  and  the  old  building  soon  existed  only  in 
memory. 

A  quarter  of  a  century  ago  the  Reverend  Warren  Dawley, 
who  now  owns  the  Perry  Watson  house,  bought  the  meeting 
house  lot  for  $5.  In  cutting  down  oak  trees  which  stood 
upon  it,  he  found  iron  hitching  rings  imbedded  in  the  wood. 
Within  the  lot  are  two  graves,  and  just  outside,  over  the 
wall,  another,  reputed  to  be  that  of  a  suicide  unworthy  of 
burial  in  holy  ground. 

Beyond  the  Meeting  House  at  the  fork  of  the  two  roads, 
near  Stanton's  Corners,  stood  the  community  school  house, 
which  gave  School  House  Hill  its  name.  It  was  built  by 
Samuel  Clarke  in  1812  and  was  used  for  school  purposes 
until  it  was  outgrown.  In  1  844  a  new  school  house  was 
built  in  District  Number  3  across  Beaver  River,  and  the 


108  RHODE  ISLAND   HISTORICAL  SOCIETY 

old  building  was  moved  to  the  farm  of  Samuel  Clarke, 
where  it  is  still  standing  in  a  good  state  of  preservation.  The 
Reverend  James  R.  Irish,  who  was  schoolmaster  here  in 
1828-9,  mentions  among  his  pupils  Abiel  and  Elijah  Ken- 
yon,  Perry  Clarke,  Charles  and  Simeon  P.  Clarke — found- 
ers of  Clarke's  Mills — Mary  Clarke,  daughter  of  Samuel 
Clarke,  Harriet  Stanton,  and  Daniel  Marchant,  a  colored 
lad. 

Opposite  the  Meeting  House  was  the  Stanton  Farm.  The 
dwelling  house,  reached  by  a  wide  and  grassy  lane  bordered 
by  locust  trees,  lingers  in  memory  as  a  quiet  and  pleasant 
retreat  remote  from  the  road,  with  a  charming  view  of  the 
valley  beyond.  Fire  visited  it  many  years  ago,  and  weeds 
and  bushes  now  grow  over  the  stones  of  the  fallen  chimney 
and  cellar  wall. 

Near  the  ruins  of  the  Stanton  House  is  the  Stanton  burial 
lot,  hidden  among  forest  trees  which  have  crept  over  once 
fertile  meadows  and  would  have  encroached  upon  this  spot 
had  it  not  been  kept  open  by  Miss  Kenyon. 

In  the  center  of  a  grassy  space  are  nineteen  graves.  A 
marble  stone  bears  the  inscription: 

John  Stanton 

Died  Jan.  22,  1762 

Aged  89 

His  Father 

John  Stanton 

Died  in  Newport  1 728 

Aged  83 

His  Grandfather 

Robert  Stanton 

Died  at  Newport  1672 

Aged  73 

His  First  Wife 

Elizabeth 

Died  at  Newport  1730 

Aged  50 


THE  STANTON  PURCHASE  109 

His  Last  Wife 
Susannah 

Died  at  Richmond  1807 
Aged  92 

Erected  by  B.  Stanton,  a 
Great-Grandson,  in  1841 

Two  slate  stones  are  inscribed 
In  Memory  of 
Deacon         John  Stanton 
who  died  Dec.  31 

1842 

In  his  8 1  st  year 

In  Memory  of 

Marv  Stanton 

Wife  of 

John  Stanton 

who  died  Sept.  18,  1841 

in  the  75  year  of  her  age. 

The  remaining  stones  are  not  marked. 

The  Stanton  house  in  the  years  of  its  decline  was  occupied 
by  Giffey  Marchant  and  her  son  Daniel.  Giffey,  an  ancient 
dame,  turbaned  and  bent,  was  an  object  of  wonder  and  awe 
among  children ;  but  Daniel  was  beloved  by  all  who  knew 
him,  and  served  faithfully  on  farms  where  he  was  con- 
stantly employed  as  a  spare  hand.  He  was  a  descendant  of 
a  freed  slave,  Abraham,  once  belonging  to  Judge  Marchant, 
and  a  freed  slave  woman  who  had  belonged  to  Samuel 
Clarke.  Abraham  Marchant  lived  on  an  island  in  Great 
Swamp,  called  to  this  day  "Abraham's  Island."  The  ruins 
of  the  bridge  by  which  it  was  reached  are  still  visible.  Daniel 
was  brought  up  in  the  home  of  Samuel  Clarke  and  was  the 
playfellow  and  schoolmate  of  Samuel  Clarke's  grandson. 
For  some  reason  this  humble  workman  is  better  remem- 
bered than  men  of  means  and  position,  and  many  anecdotes 
about  him  are  still  recollected  in  the  places  where  he  was 
once  known. 


110  RHODE  ISLAND  HISTORICAL  SOCIETY 

In  the  cemetery  on  the  estate  of  Mrs.  Marvel,  where  the 
nineteenth  century  Clarkes  are  buried,  are  several  graves, 
probably  of  the  family  slaves.  One  is  marked  by  a  stone  on 
which  is  crudely  cut— G.  M.  Died  Feb.  16,  1884  Ag  91. 
This  stone  was  lettered  by  a  kindly  neighbor  in  the  presence 
of  those  who  had  assembled  to  honor  Giffey  Marchant  and 
her  son  Daniel.  He  was  soon  after  laid  to  rest  in  a  nameless 
grave  at  her  side. 

Ancient  landmarks  are  slowly  but  surely  disappearing 
within  the  Stanton  Purchase.  A  few  old  houses,  some 
tumble-down  walls  and  rotting  fences,  cellar-holes  near 
which  the  lilacs  bloom  in  May,  and  the  last  resting  places 
of  those  long  dead,  alone  remain  to  tell  us  of  the  passage 
of  time  since  YVannumachon  sold  the  birthright  of  his 
people  to  white  men. 


Ships'  Protests,  1697-1700 

(Continued  from  fage  79) 

These  are  to  Certifie  .  .  .  that  this  day  appeared  before  mee 
david  Campanall  of  Newport  in  the  Collony  of  Rhoad 
Island  .  .  .  marrinr  who  together  with  Peter  Raymand  of 
New  York  &  Henry  Johnson  with  Marke  Moss  all  of  the 
City  of  New  yorke  Imbarked  in  the  providence1'1  Sloope  of 
Rhoad  Island  David  Campanill  Above  Sd  Commander 
And  being  bound  for  this  port  of  Newport  &  being  betwene 
New  haven  &  this  place  the  Storme  Arose  And  Sea  Rune  in 
greatt  Stress  of  weather  over  us  our  terpallen  being  Layd  in 
So  much  that  wee  had  14  or  15  Inches  of  water  in  the  hold 
to  the  greatt  damage  of  marchants  goods  is  on  borde. 
Signed  in  presence  of  us 

Peter  Raymand 
Protest  noted  Nov.  16,  1697.      Henry  Johnson 

MarkX  Moss       (11,61) 

13One  of  the  earliest  boats  named  for  the  Town  of  Providence. 


ships'  protests,  1697-1700  111 

Newport  in  Rhoad  Island  octobr  6th  1698 
.  .  .  wee  Daniell  Hempson  master  of  the  good  Sloope  the 
Speedwell  of  new  yorke  david  Campanall  marr  &  Benj. 
Cranston  passanger  waying  Anchor  the  1 7th  day  of  Sep- 
tembr  Last  bound  from  the  Above  Sd  port  of  New  Yorke 
.  .  .  To  the  porte  of  Boston  .  .  .  Laden  with  tobacko  upon 
fraight  being  marchants  goods  &  by  gods  providence  meat- 
ting  with  contrary  winds  &  Stress  of  waves  particulurly  on 
the  26th  day  of  the  7ber:  being  then  in  the  Sound  &  Against 
Bradford14  with  the  Riger  of  the  Storme  &  Seas  wee  Springe 
a  Leake  &  ware  forsed  for  the  Safty  of  our  Lives  &  goods 
to  putt  into  Sd  Bradford  And  Have  Ever  Sence  Continued 
at  the  pumpe  glas  &  glasse13  untill  our  Arrivall  in  this  port  of 
Newport  the  5th  of  octobr  1698  And  may  by  reason  of 
what  is  Afore  premiced  Indge1"  tht  thare  is  damage  done 
to  the  marchants  goods  on  bord  Sd  Sloope  to  the  truth  heare 
of  wee  have  taken  our  Sollom  Engagments1'  &  Sett  to  our 
hands . . . 

Daniell  Hunson 
David  Campanall18 
Benj.  Cranston     (11,79) 

14Branford,  Conn. 

15"glass  and  glass"  means  "watch  after  watch,"  that  is,  continuously. 

16Injury. 

17Ebenezer  Slocum  and  Rebecca  Clark  signed  as  witnesses. 

18Was  David  Campanall  a  relative  of  Abraham  Campanall,  the  Newport 
Jew?  See  R.  I.  Col.  Rec.  Ill,  243;  and  Rider's  Book  Notes,  vol.  XXII, 
p.  98  et  als. 


112  RHODE  ISLAND   HISTORICAL  SOCIETY 


The  Date  of  Roger  Williams'  Birth 

The  date  of  the  birth  of  Roger  Williams  is  not  known. 
In  his  writings  we  find  six  references  to  his  age. 

1.  In  an  undated  letter,1  which  from  its  context  must 
have  been  written  between  July  and  October  1632,  he 
describes  himself  as  "nearer  upwards  of  30  than  25,"  by 
which  he  appears  to  mean  that  he  was  nearer  30  than  25; 
that  is  over  27^,  and  hence  born  not  later  than  the  early 
part  of  1605. 

2.  In  this  letter"  he  also  wrote  of  having  been  "perse- 
cuted even  in  and  out  of  my  father's  house  these  20  years." 
This  is  not  a  very  definite  statement,  but  it  might  well  be 
assumed  that  a  child  would  be  at  least  five  before  he  was 
persecuted  for  his  religious  beliefs  or  his  lack  of  them.  This 
would  seem  to  indicate  that  Roger  Williams  was  born  be- 
fore 1607. 

3.  The  third  reference  chronologically  in  regard  to  his 
age  was  recently  discovered  by  Mr.  G.  Andrews  Moriarty 
in  a  hitherto  unpublished  deposition  on  file  in  the  Town 
Clerk's  office  at  Portsmouth,  R.  I.  It  states  that  Roger 
Williams  was  about  56  in  1 662  which  would  indicate  that  he 
was  born  about  1606,  or  in  fact  any  time  in  1605,  1606  or 
1 607,  for  the  word  about  makes  the  statement  vague. 

The  deposition  is  as  follows: 

[Endorsed]  Mr  Roger  Williams  his  testimony  about 
Hogge  Island 

Providence  the  15th  of  November  1662.  The  Testimony 
of  Mr  Roger  Williams  of  Providence  aged  about  56  yeares 
is  as  follows:  I  testifie  in  the  holy  presence  of  God  that 
whereas  divers  of  our  Neighbours  of  Rhode  Island  treated 
with  the  Governor  of  Plimouth  Mr  Bradford  &  the  Magis- 


'Narra.  Club.  vol.  VI,  p.  2. 
"idem. 


DATE   OF   ROGER    WILLIAMS'    BIRTH  113 

trates  about  a  Plantation  at  Souwams  they  declared  to  us  in 
the  name  of  their  Colloney  in  the  Governors  house  in  Pli- 
mouth  that  they  could  not  part  with  souwames  for  they 
reserved  it  for  &  desighned  it  of  old  for  themselves  but  if 
their  Countrey  men  (aforesayd)  would  please  to  purchase 
Acquednicke  now  called  Rhoade  Island  with  the  litle  Is- 
lands about  it  they  should  lay  no  claime  therunto  but  they 
should  bee  glad  of  their  full  acomodation  &  Neighbour- 
hood, and  they  never*  in  the  least  made  any  exception  of 
the  litle  Island  called  Hogge  Island  and  therefore  or 
friendes  of  Portsmouth  imediately  upon  their  first  plant- 
inge  &  ever  since  possessed  &  enjoyed  it. 

2.  When  I  being  interpreter  treated  with  Miantonomu 
about  acomodatinge  of  my  friendes  with  Rhode  Island  hee 
was  exceedinge  willinge  &  free  that  they  should  have  all 
possible  acomodation  within  his  power  which  was  supreame 
at  that  time  over  Ousamaquin  &  this  whole  Bay,  and  hee 
often  sayd  to  mee  that  they  should  injoy  the  litle  Ilandes 
about  Acquednicke  as  well  as  Acquednicke  it  selfe. 

3.  At  that  time  (as  well  as  before)  Ousamaquin  con- 
fessed to  mee  hee  was  subject  to  the  Narrogansets  and  was 
expresly  sent  to  by  Miantonomu  to  further  all  hee  could  this 
Plantation  at  Acquednicke,  and  Ousamaquin  did  often  in 
my  hearinge  &  to  my  selfe  declare  his  willinge  and  free 
consent  that  Rhode  Islandmen  should  injoy  the  litle  Island 
called  Hogge  Island  [as]  well  as  Rhoade  Island  it  selfe 
Taken  upon  Oath  or  ingadgement  before  mee  the  day  and 
yeare  abovesayd  John  Greene  Ge11  Asistant. 

The  above  written  is  entred  and  Recorded  in  page  (412) 
in  the  Town  Book  belonging  to  the  town  of  Portsmouth  pr 
me  John  Anthony  Town  Clerke. 

4.  In  1676  he  wrote'  "from  my  childhood  (now  above 
three  score  years)",  which  would  make  his  childhood  before 
1616  and  his  birth  presumably  as  early  as  1 606. 

3George  Fox  Digged  out  of  his  Burrows.  N.  C.  vol.  V,  p.  (unnum- 
bered) lxiv.   In  original  page  a3. 


114  RHODE  ISLAND  HISTORICAL  SOCIETY 

5.  In  February  1677/8  he  called  himself  "aged  about 
seventie  five  years,"4  which  would  make  him  born  about 
1 602/3  which  being  in  round  numbers  might  mean  any  time 
from  1601  to  1605. 

6.  In  July  1 679  he  said''  he  was  "now  neare  Foure  score 
years",  by  which  he  would  probably  mean  that  he  was  be- 
tween 70  and  80,  and  indicates  his  birth  as  between  1 60  1  and 
1609. 

The  five  later  statements,  although  only  approximate, 
are  in  harmony  with  the  period  indicated  by  the  first 
statement. 

From  his  own  statements,  then,  it  would  appear  that  he 
was  born  not  later  than  the  early  part  of  1605.  On  the  other 
hand  Roger  Williams  was  elected  a  scholar  of  the  Charter- 
House  school  25  June  1 62 1  and  as,  according  to  the  regula- 
tions, boys  over  14  were  not  admitted,  it  would  seem  to 
follow  that  Roger  Williams  was  born  not  earlier  than  the 
latter  part  of  1 606  in  which  case  he  might  still  be  considered 
as  "fourteen"  until  he  reached  his  fifteenth  birthday 
anniversary. 

Straus,"  taking  the  Charter-House  evidence  as  a  basis, 
argues  that  Williams  must  have  been  under  14  in  June  1621 
and  so  born  in  1607.  He  interprets  "nearer  upwards  of  30 
then  25"  as  "another  way  of  saying  he  was  over  25  and 
under  30,  or  nearer  to  30  than  25  is  to  30  which  would 
agree  with  his  date  of  birth  in  1607;  that  is  to  say,  he  was 
between  25  and  26  years  of  age." 

This  Charter-House  evidence,  which  places  his  birth  as 
not  earlier  than  June  1606,  and  his  own  statement  which 
makes  him  born  not  later  than  July  1605  seem  irrecon- 
cilable. 

It  does  not  seem  likely  that  Williams  could  have  made 
a  mistake  in  his  age  in  1632,  while  it  is  very  possible  that 


4R.  I.H.S.  Pub.  VIII, p.  156. 

■r'R.  l.Col.  Rec.  Ill,  57;  R.  I.  H.  S.  Coll.  Ill,  166. 
''Roger  Williams  by  Oscar  S.  Straus  p.  1  1 . 


DATE   OF   ROGER   WILLIAMS'    BIRTH  115 

through  the  influence  of  Coke,  the  age  rule  of  the  Charter- 
House  was  extended  or  even  waived  in  Williams'  case. 

Mr.  H.  S.  Wright,  Secretary  of  the  Charter-House 
writing  9  Jan.  1916  states  that  the  Governors'  order  of  28 
June  1619  was  that  no  scholar  "be  admitted  or  received  but 
that  he  shalbe  between  tenn  and  fourteene  yeares  of  age," 
but  Mr.  Wright  adds  that  exceptions  were  sometimes  made. 

The  Benoni  Waterman  family  bible'  contains  an  item 
written  by  Benoni  Waterman  many  years  after  Roger 
Williams'  death  which  states  that  "Roger  Williams  was 
born  in  Wales  in  1599".  This  item  is  recorded  too  late  to 
be  considered  as  pertinent  to  this  discussion,  but  it  seems  to 
be  the  first  record  in  writing  of  a  family  tradition,  which 
though  probably  inaccurate,  has  been  often  quoted. 

7In  library  of  Rhode  Island  Historical  Societv. 


New  Publications  of  Rhode  Island  Interest 

"The  Gilbert  Stuart  Birthplace.  A  brief  History  of  the 
Birthplace,  its  Purchase  and  Restoration,  the  forming  of 
the  Corporation  and  Future  Projects,"  by  Caroline  Hazard, 
has  been  published  as  an  illustrated  pamphlet  of  2 1  pages. 

The  New  England  Quarterly  for  June  1935  contains  an 
article  on  "The  Library  of  an  Eighteenth  Century  Gentle- 
man of  Rhode  Island"  (Henry  Marchant ),  by  Susan  Stan- 
ton Brayton. 

A  History  of  the  Blackstone  Canal  by  Zelotes  W.  Coombs 
appears  in  the  April  1935  issue  of  The  Worcester  Historical 
Society  Publications. 

The  Bulletin  of  the  Newport  Historical  Society  for 
January  1935  contains  an  article  on  the  Touro  Family  of 
Newport  by  Morris  A.  Gutstein. 


116  RHODE  ISLAND  HISTORICAL  SOCIETY 

Irish  Builders  of  Colonial  Rhode  Island  is  the  title  of 
a  pamphlet  of  12  pages  by  Richard  J.  Purcell. 

The  American  Genealogist  for  July  1935  contains  an 
article  on  the  early  generations  of  the  Lake  family  in  Rhode 
Island  by  G.  Andrews  Moriarty. 


Notes 

Mr.  Denison  W.  Greene  has  been  elected  to  member- 
ship in  the  Society. 


Chief  Big  Thunder: 

A  Problematic  Figure  in  Rhode  Island  Annals 
By  Edmund  B.  Delabarre 

The  astounding  career  of  P.  T.  Barnum  was  a  striking 
illustration  of  people's  delight  in  harmless  humbug.  Most 
of  us  like  the  seeming  magic  of  sleight-of-hand  perform- 
ances, especially  if,  after  enjoying  the  creepy  thrill  of 
them,  we  can  discover  later  just  how  the  illusion  was  pro- 
duced. It  is  something  of  that  type  which  is  to  engage  our 
present  attention.  A  romantic-sounding  character  made 
brief  contact  with  Rhode  Island  history  some  seventy-five 
years  ago.  He  was  described  in  a  manner  that  left  a  glamour 
of  marvel  and  mystery  about  him.  For  the  sake  of  their 
dramatic  appeal,  his  picturesque  pretensions  almost  ought 
to  have  been  true.  Carefully  conducted  impartial  investiga- 
tion does  not  seem  to  permit  us  to  believe  in  them.  It  will 
be  a  diverting  task  to  follow  the  example  of  a  book  by 


CHIEF  BIG  THUNDER  117 

David  P.  Abbott  called  Behind  the  Scenes  with  Mediums, 
and  set  forth  first  the  first-hand  tricky  appearances,  and 
then  the  facts  which  lie  behind  them. 

General  Guy  M.  Fessenden,  and  later  Miss  Virginia 
Baker,  introduced  us  many  years  ago  to  the  remarkable 
Indian  personality  about  whom  we  are  inquiring.  Their 
tale  left  us  with  an  impression  of  his  wonderful  possessions, 
discoveries  and  abilities.  During  the  course  of  my  own 
researches  about  the  possible  origin  of  the  rock-inscription 
near  Mount  Hope,  some  years  ago,  I  considered  him  for 
a  short  time  as  a  doubtful  candidate  for  the  honor  of  having 
made  the  carving.  Soon  after,  I  decided  positively  against 
this  possibility.  But  even  if  he  could  have  had  nothing  to  do 
with  this  particular  mystery,  as  became  clearly  evident,  still 
he  remained  an  inviting  problem  in  himself.  Accordingly, 
I  made  exhaustive  inquiries  about  him,  and  was  fortunate 
enough  to  secure  much  reliable  information  from  many 
sources.* 

The  larger  knowledge  thus  gained,  I  feel,  ought  not  to 
be  lost  through  being  left  unrecorded.  So  I  have  thought  it 
well  to  assemble  my  notes  about  this  unusual  case,  and  to 
introduce  Francis  Loring,  Chief  Big  Thunder,  anew  to  a 
Rhode  Island  audience.  I  shall  let  Miss  Baker  first  tell 
about  him  and  his  exploits,  and  then  try  to  see  what  truth 
lies  in  the  story.  Although  we  shall  find  our  hero,  as  some 
of  my  correspondents  express  it,  "an  untruthful  and  un- 
trustworthy old  rascal,"  yet  his  big  pretensions  make  at 
least  an  appealing  fairy-tale  which  is  worth  relating.  The 
whole  story  as  it  existed  prior  to  my  own  inquiries  was  given 
in  1904  by  Miss  Baker,  as  follows: 

"After  the  close  of  Philip's  war,  the  remnant  of  the 
Wampanoags  fled  to  Maine,  and  ultimately  became  merged 

*My  gratitude  is  due  especially  to  Miss  Baker,  Mrs.  Fannie  Hardy 
Eckstorm  of  Brewer,  Maine,  and  Dr.  Frank  G.  Speck  of  the  University 
of  Pennsylvania.  All  of  them  were  exceedingly  patient  and  helpful  in 
answering  the  many  queries  which  I  addressed  to  them.  Quotations  from 
them  which  follow  herein  are  from  correspondence  conducted  in  1 920. 


118  RHODE  ISLAND  HISTORICAL  SOCIETY 

in  the  Penobscot  tribe.  Up  to  half  a  century  ago,  parties  of 
Penobscot  Indians  were  in  the  habit  of  making  periodical 
visits  to  Warren,  camping  for  several  days  in  various  parts 
of  the  town.  .  .  .  The  following  article,  contributed  by 
Gen.  Guy  M.  Fessenden,  appeared  in  the  Warren  Tele- 
graph issue  of  June  2,  1860.  .  .  .  'Mr.  Francis  Loring,  an 
intelligent  Indian,  and  a  member  of  the  Penobscot  tribe, 
who  has  been  in  this  vicinity  for  several  weeks,  informed  the 
writer  that  the  tribe  had  in  their  possession,  and  which  they 
carefully  preserved  among  their  national  archives,  an 
ancient  book  made  of  skins,  containing  many  descriptions  of 
important  historical  localities,  some  of  which  are  in  this 
vicinity,  all  of  them  in  the  ancient  Indian  style  of  signs  and 
picture  writing.  One  of  these  pictures  represents  four  men 
rolling  a  heavy  circular  stone,  by  a  stick  placed  through  a 
hole  in  the  centre,  back  and  forth  over  a  quantity  of  corn, 
and  described  as  the  Wampanoag  national  grinding  mill, 
where  corn  was  ground  for  war  parties  or  for  any  large  pub- 
lic gathering  of  the  people.  The  locality  of  the  place  was  so 
plainly  stated  that  Mr.  Loring  had  no  difficulty  in  finding 
it.  It  is  at  the  place  called  King's  Rocks  in  Warren,  near  the 
Swansea  line  about  two  miles  from  the  village.'  " 

Miss  Baker's  account  states  further  that  from  another 
picture  in  the  book  Mr.  Loring  located,  near  Wigwam  Hill, 
a  mile  east  of  the  grinding  place,  an  Indian  cemetery.  She 
continues:  "Mr.  Francis  Loring,  known  also  by  the  name 
'Big  Thunder,'  is  now  living,  at  an  advanced  age,  on  Indian 
Old  Town  Island,  Maine,  and  is  the  custodian  of  the  Penob- 
scot tribe.  The  writer  recently  learned  from  him  that  the 
'ancient  book  made  of  skins'  .  .  .  was,  a  few  years  ago,  acci- 
dentally destroyed  by  fire."* 

From  my  talks  and  correspondence  with  Miss  Baker, 
I  gained  a  very  high  regard  for  her  intelligence  and  good 
judgment.  In  fact,  in  the  above  account  she  merely  related 
a  remarkable  story  as  it  came  to  her.  That  she  did  not  credit 

*Virginia  Baker,  Massasoit's  Town ;  Sowams  in  Pokanokit.  Its  History, 
Legends  and  Traditions.  1904. 


CHIEF  BIG  THUNDER  119 

it  fully  is  evidenced  by  the  fact  that,  as  we  shall  see,  she 
gathered  further  details  about  this  marvelous  person  but 
did  not  publish  them  because  she  was  not  satisfied  about 
their  reliability.  None  of  us  alone  can  arrive  at  the  whole 
truth.  Personally,  like  her,  I  would  have  liked  to  believe 
that  there  was  such  a  pictographic  record  of  Wampanoag 
history  as  Loring  claimed  and  she  described,  if  only  there 
were  good  grounds  for  the  belief;  just  as  I  would  have 
liked  to  believe  that  a  truly  remarkable  stone  tablet  said  to 
have  been  found  near  Taunton  was  a  genuine  record  of 
long-ago  conflicts  of  Indians  with  mammoths  and  a  picto- 
graphic portrayal  of  the  wanderings  of  Algonkian  Indians 
throughout  a  long  series  of  successive  generations.*  I  find 
no  warrant  for  accepting  either  of  them  as  authentic. 

Even  so,  if  in  the  end  we  must  class  most  of  Big  Thun- 
der's pretensions  in  the  category  of  deliberate  inventions, 
still  they  do  not  lose  a  certain  charm  and  attractiveness.  If 
they  lack  historical  veracity,  they  may  nevertheless  prop- 
erly appeal  as  a  pleasing  work  of  fiction.  Only,  to  enjoy 
them  as  such,  we  must  know  that  that  is  what  they  are.  So 
we  pass  from  wish-fulfilling  myth  and  mystery  to  an  exam- 
ination of  what  we  can  discover  about  the  truth. 

The  very  first  statement  which  I  have  quoted  from  Miss 
Baker  is  in  need  of  revision.  Her  impression  that  "the 
remnant  of  the  Wampanoags  merged  with  the  Penobscot 
tribe"  was  derived  from  fallible  local  tradition.  We  know 
on  good  evidence  that  some  members  of  the  tribe  surely  fled 
somewhere,  and  it  may  well  have  been  to  Maine.  While 
granting  this,  persons  who  know  the  Penobscots  well  assure 
me  that  there  is  no  proof  of  any  real  "merging"  of  the  two 
tribes,  and  that  in  any  case  it  cannot  have  been  important 
enough  in  amount  or  consequences  to  have  served  as  a  sound 
basis  for  Loring's  claims.  Though  he  told  people  in  Warren 
that  he  was  of  Wampanoag  descent,  and  was  "custodian  of 
the  national  archives"  of  that  tribe,  we  shall  find  reason  to 
reject  such  statements. 

♦These  Collections,  192  5,  vol.  1  8,  pp.  5  5ff. 


120  RHODE  ISLAM)    HISTORICAL   SOCIETY 

There  is  no  doubt,  however,  that  Penobscots  did  visit 
Warren,  probably  several  times  earlier  and  certainly  in 
1860  j  just  as  they  often  went  to  other  places,  as  far  distant 
sometimes  as  Philadelphia,  in  the  summer-time,  "for  trade 
and  a  good  time."  Loring  was  certainly  a  member  of  their 
party  in  1860.  He  was  described  by  Miss  Baker's  aunt, 
who  saw  him  there,  as  "a  very  handsome  man,  over  six  feet 
tall,  very  dignified  and  modest  in  appearance."  The  only 
further  details  about  him  which  I  have  seen  in  print  are  in 
a  clipping  from  the  Boston  Sunday  Globe,  probably  of  some 
date  in  1904.  It  shows  a  photograph  of  him,  speaks  of  his 
being  six  feet  four  inches  tall,  and  gives  further  information 
which  I  condense  as  follows:  "His  father  died  when  he  was 
an  infant  and  little  is  known  of  his  history.  His  mother  was 
a  doctress  of  the  tribe,  and  practiced  medicine  in  Boston  and 
Portland.  She  died  in  Portland  July  4,  1833.  He  was  then 
a  lad  of  12,  youngest  of  eight  children.  After  she  died,  he 
and  his  sisters  began  making  baskets  for  a  living.  They 
traveled  as  far  as  New  York  and  Philadelphia,  where  they 
met  Barnum,  with  whom  they  remained  for  eight  months. 
He  married  three  times  and  had  eight  children." 

This  would  seem  to  fix  the  year  of  his  birth  as  1821, 
which  agrees  closely  with  his  own  statement  in  1860  that 
he  was  then  forty  years  old.  But  a  dispatch  from  Oldtown, 
Maine,  dated  April  7,  1 906,  published  in  the  Boston  Globe, 
stated  that  Old  Big  Thunder  died  on  that  day,  at  the  age 
of  79.  This  is  more  nearly  in  accord  with  the  results  of 
inquiries  by  Mrs.  Eckstorm.  She  could  not  discover  the 
exact  truth,  and  says  that  Indians  habitually  add  a  few  years 
in  giving  their  age.  Her  best  calculations  fit  fairly  the  impli- 
cation of  this  1906  assertion,  for  she  arrives  at  the  conclu- 
sion that  he  was  born  sometime  about  1824  to  1827.  His 
parentage  as  well  as  his  age  is  not  so  certain  as  was  assumed 
in  the  news-item  cited  above,  which  seems  also  to  have 
understated  his  marital  status.  An  Indian  woman  who  had 
known  him,  in  commenting  upon  this  matter,  remarked 


CHIEF  BIG  THUNDER  121 

that  he  had  had  eight  "wives,"  of  all  nationalities  and  all 
colors  "from  ebony  to  pea-green." 

His  name  is  variously  given ;  in  recent  years  at  least  most 
commonly  as  Francis  Loring,  Chief  Big  Thunder.  Speck 
suggests  that  his  claim  to  Wampanoag  descent  was  untrue, 
and  that  Loring  may  be  an  old  Penobscot  family  name, 
spelled  Loron  in  early  documents,  possibly  derived  from 
the  French  "Laurent,"  a  common  Indian  family  name. 
George  Hunt,  formerly  for  many  years  Indian  agent  at 
Oldtown,  wrote  to  me  in  1920  that  he  had  always  supposed 
Frank  Loring  to  be  a  Penobscot  Indian,  and  that  the  older 
Indians  there  knew  nothing  about  any  Wampanoags  joining 
the  Penobscots  at  any  time.  In  connection  with  what  we  are 
to  discover  shortly  about  his  character,  this  certainly  sug- 
gests that  Loring  made  up  the  story  for  its  picturesque  effect 
at  Warren.  Mrs.  Eckstorm,  who  has  had  a  long  and  intimate 
acquaintance  with  the  Penobscots,  says  that  until  recently  he 
had  always  been  known  at  Oldtown,  not  as  Loring,  but  as 
"Big  Frank  Lola." 

He  never  had  a  bona  fide  Indian  name; — "the  Penob- 
scots have  lost  the  practice  of  native  naming  since  conver- 
sion to  Christianity,"  writes  Dr.  Speck.  There  is  some  un- 
certainty about  the  source  of  the  other  name  by  which  he 
was  familiarly  known,  "Chief  Big  Thunder."  The  "Chief" 
part  seems  to  have  been  his  own  invention.  I  have  reliable 
information  that  he  never  was  a  chief.  It  has  been  suggested 
that  the  "Big  Thunder"  part  was  conferred  upon  him 
because  of  his  preposterous  stories.  But  it  seems  that  it  goes 
back  of  that.  Mrs.  Eckstorm  has  probably  hit  upon  the 
actual  source  of  it.  She  has  an  old  circus  poster  which  leaves 
date  and  place  to  be  filled  in  in  writing,  and  announces  that 
a  troupe  of  actors  and  actresses  of  a  tribe  from  west  of  the 
Rocky  Mountains  is  to  give  an  exhibition  "under  the  direc- 
tion of  the  Famous  Indian  Prophet  Big  Thunder."  The 
particular  one  of  these  posters  which  she  has  announces  a 
performance  in  Brewer,  Maine,  year  not  stated  but  prob- 
ably about  1855.  The  actual  exhibitors  there,  as  she  knows 


122  RHODE  ISLAM)    HISTORICAL  SOCIETY 

from  a  trustworthy  source,  were  Francis  Lola  and  two 
nephews  (or  cousins).  She  surmises  that  Lola  had  traveled 
with  the  original  troupe,  had  swiped  a  lot  of  the  handbills, 
"and  then  had  the  face  to  come  back  to  this  town,  where 
they  were  known  to  everyone,  and  show  these  circulars 
stating  that  they  came  from  'west  of  the  Rocky  Mountains.' 
My  father  ( Manly  Hardy)  used  to  say  that  Big  Thunder 
took  his  name  from  this  circus  program.  As  it  unquestion- 
ably was  printed  for  some  other  'prophet'  than  he,  I  should 
say  he  stole  the  name,  and  the  tribe  let  him  keep  it  as  a 
huge  joke." 

This  was  doubtless  not  his  only  venture  in  the  circus 
business.  There  is  no  reason  to  doubt  the  statement  that  he 
was  with  Barnum  for  a  time  in  his  early  youth.  He  once 
told  George  Hunt  that  he  had  traveled  with  Barnum's 
shows  for  twenty  years,  all  over  the  country.  The  Globe, 
however,  boils  down  this  exaggeration  to  a  mere  eight 
months.  Barnum  makes  no  reference  to  him  in  his  pub- 
lished reminiscences,  although  he  does  speak  of  having 
been  "in  the  habit  of  engaging  parties  of  American  Indians 
from  the  far  West  to  exhibit  at  the  Museum,"  for  many 
years  previous  to  1864.*  In  the  midst  of  his  vast  array  of 
other  "unsurpassed  curiosities,"  our  Big  Thunder  made  too 
little  individual  impression  upon  him  to  be  singled  out  for 
special  mention.  How  long  their  actual  relationship  lasted 
we  have  no  means  of  knowing.  Evidently  it  was  long 
enough  to  give  Loring  some  useful  training  in  preparation 
for  his  later  career. 

About  Loring's  character,  apart  from  the  impression  he 
made  at  Warren,  I  find  absolutely  undeviating  agreement. 
A  few  quotations  from  my  correspondence  will  suffice  to 
make  this  clear.  One  of  the  mildest  of  them  is  this:  "He 
was  quite  a  character,  and  had  many  virtues.  He  had  fail- 
ings, however,  and  one  of  them  was  a  certain  exaggeration 
or  amplification  that  sometimes  shot  wide  of  the  truth." 

*P.  T.  Barnum,  Struggles  and  Triumphs,  1874,  p.  5  73. 


CHIEF  BIG  THUNDER  123 

Others  remark,  practically  unanimously,  that  he  was  a  pic- 
turesque and  unrestrained  liar.  "No  one  who  knew  him 
would  believe  a  word  he  said.  He  must  have  told  some 
truth;  but  it  takes  an  expert  to  sort  out  his  stuff,  and  any 
claims  that  he  ever  made  for  himself  are  so  sure  to  be  false 
that  they  are  not  worth  arguing  over."  "He  would  have 
been  willing  to  claim  that  he  was  Philip  re-incarnated  if  the 
idea  had  struck  him;  and  he  would  have  acted  the  part,  too! 
What  he  said  about  himself  would  not  matter  in  the  least." 
It  was  mostly  "stuff  and  nonsense"  that  he  narrated.  "There 
was  no  odor  of  sanctity  about  old  Big  Thunder.  The  old 
fellow  was  held  in  little  esteem  by  his  tribesmen,  and  it  was 
all  he  deserved."  These  seem  to  be  entirely  impartial  and 
reliable  estimates  of  his  prevailing  characteristics,  and  we 
shall  find  them  further  exemplified  in  what  follows.  He 
was  a  natural  show-man,  a  little  Barnum,  and  he  made  his 
living  out  of  it. 

The  most  intriguing  thing  to  us  Rhode  Islanders  in  the 
story  of  his  adventures  in  Warren  is  that  mysterious  "book 
of  skins"  which  was  said  to  depict  important  features  of 
the  history  of  the  Wampanoags.  It  would  have  been  a  price- 
less possession  for  preservation  among  our  State's  historical 
treasures,  if  authentic  and  procurable.  But  we  are  well  pre- 
pared now  to  estimate  the  value  of  the  assertions  which  he 
made  about  it.  The  most  detailed  description  of  it  extant  is 
in  the  manuscript  note-book  of  Miss  Baker,  from  which  she 
permitted  me  to  make  an  excerpt.  It  must  not  be  inferred 
that  she  trusted  the  story  without  reservation.  Although  it 
appealed  to  her  as  something  that  would  be  important  and 
absorbingly  interesting  if  true,  yet  she  did  not  put  faith 
enough  in  it  to  be  willing  to  publish  it  without  surer  knowl- 
edge. She  gave  me  permission,  however,  to  use  it  if  I  saw 
fit,  and  I  am  certain  that  she  would  have  approved  of  its 
inclusion  in  this  present  setting.  The  pertinent  passage  is 
dated  1903,  and  relates  the  result  of  an  investigation  made 
for  her  by  a  friend  who  had  been  to  Indian  Old  Town 


124  RHODE  ISLAND  HISTORICAL  SOCIETY 

Island  and  had  had  an  interview  with  Big  Thunder.  Her 
account  of  it  follows: 

"He  (Big  Thunder)  told  all  about  the  ancient  'book  of 
skins'  referred  to  by  Gen.  Fessenden.  It  was  burned,  as  the 
Indian  agent  wrote  me  several  years  ago.  The  book,  for 
many  years,  was  believed  to  be  made  of  skins,  but  it  was 
discovered  that  the  so-called  skins  were  really  sheets  of 
birch  bark  cured  in  a  way  that  made  them  look  like  skins. 
Big  Thunder  showed  a  piece  of  bark  prepared  in  the  same 
way,  and  one  could  not  tell  it  from  a  skin.  This  ancient 
book  was  a  sort  of  chart  or  record  of  localities  in  Warren, 
Bristol,  and  part  of  Providence.  By  it  Big  Thunder  located 
King's  Rocks,  King  Philip's  Chair,  the  Indian  Burial  Place 
on  Edward  Mason's  farm  on  the  Big  Swamp  Road,  and 
other  Indian  localities.  Big  Thunder  said  that  in  the  chart 
was  a  picture  of  a  niche  in  the  side  of  a  hill  with  an  Indian 
seated  in  it  shooting  at  a  head-dress  set  up  on  a  rock  at 
some  distance  ahead  of  him.  The  meaning  of  this  picture  is 
that  King  Philip  used  to  practice  marksmanship  by  shooting 
the  feathers  off  the  head-dress.  The  niche  was  King  Philip's 
Chair  at  Mount  Hope.  The  chart  showed  that  near  this 
Chair  there  was  wampum  buried.  Big  Thunder  dug  and 
unearthed  a  collar  of  purple  and  white  beads.  It  was  shaped 
to  fit  the  neck,  the  groundwork  being  of  the  purple  beads 
with  a  sort  of  vine-like  design  of  white.  Big  Thunder  as 
custodian  of  the  tribe  had  the  collar.  He  keeps  it  in  an  old 
cracked  blue  pitcher." 

There  seems  to  be  here  some  evidence  that  Big  Thunder's 
story  about  the  book  had  grown  somewhat  in  the  interval 
since  he  had  told  it  to  Fessenden  43  years  before.  All  my 
informants  are  very  skeptical  about  this  peculiar  book.  For 
one  thing,  no  one  can  be  found  who  ever  saw  it,  whether 
Fessenden  in  1860,  or  anyone  later!  It  may  have  existed, 
or  may  not.  Even  if  it  did,  as  one  person  expresses  it,  "he 
may  have  made  it  himself,  and  burned  part  or  all  of  it. 
Indians  are  apt  to  hoax  nice  people  this  way  when  they 
think  their  victims  are  gullible  and  eager."  The  value  of 


CHIEF  BIG  THUNDER  125 

Loring's  word  for  it  we  have  probed  already.  Another 
correspondent  observes  rightly  that  so  far  as  its  contents 
have  been  described  it  would  be  a  very  queer  sort  of  book 
for  Indians  to  preserve — why  should  they  wish  to  have 
charts  of  ancient  cornmills  and  graveyards?  Loring  was 
wandering  about  in  the  vicinity  of  Warren  "for  several 
weeks,"  and  no  chart  would  have  been  needed  to  help  him 
find  the  places  which  Jie  located.  It  cannot  possibly  have 
revealed  the  burial  place  of  the  collar  described:  "collars 
of  wampum  thirty  years  ago  were  common  on  Oldtown 
Island  and  Big  Thunder  probably  got  his  beads  there ;  no 
collar  woven  of  wampum  could  last  long  in  the  ground." 
Moreover,  "there  is  no  such  thing  as  'keeper  of  the  records 
of  the  tribe.'  "  And  finally,  a  well-informed  local  Indian 
had  never  heard  of  the  existence  of  such  a  book.  It  seems  to 
have  been  invented  by  our  gifted  deceiver  especially  to 
appeal  to  a  Rhode  Island  audience. 

When  I  first  heard  of  it,  I  naturally  was  eager  to  learn 
everything  possible  about  it,  and  to  discover  whether  there 
was  any  chance  at  all  that  it  might  have  been  an  authentic 
pictographic  source -book  of  local  Indian  history.  Such 
things  are  not  unknown.  The  Lenni  Lenape  (Delawares) 
had  a  pictographic  Walam  Olum,  outlining  the  history  of 
their  migrations ;  and  B.  Perley  Poore  found  in  the  French 
archives  an  "Indian  Hieroglyphic  Picture  Book,"  the 
"Livre  des  Sauvages,"  written  about  1680.*  After  such 
reports  as  I  have  now  related,  all  my  hopes  in  this  direction 
were  completely  shattered.  The  outcome,  nevertheless, 
leaves  us  with  a  still  quaint  texture  of  pleasing  inventions  to 
console  us  for  the  lack  of  historical  veridity.  Our  "custodian 
of  the  tribe"  naturally  had  other  treasures  to  show  to  inter- 
ested visitors.  What  can  be  learned  about  these  throws 
further  light  on  the  general  nature  of  his  pretensions  and 
is  worth  placing  on  record.  I  have  two  lists  of  them,  one 
recorded  by  Miss  Baker  in  1903,  the  other  noted  down  by 

*E.  B.  Delabarre,  Dighton  Rock,  1 928,  pp.  1  77,  272,  278. 


126  RHODE   ISLAM)    HISTORICAL  SOCIETY 

Mrs.  Eckstorm  in  1901.  The  latter  says  that  at  the  time  of 
her  visit  he  displayed  a  birch  bark  sign  reading:  "Big  Thun- 
der, Indian  relics  and  Indian  traditions  told."  Both  remark 
that  he  kept  the  articles  in  a  box  or  trunk  under  his  bed. 
There  is  not  a  single  identifiable  article  that  is  the  same  in 
the  two  lists,  unless  those  which  I  have  numbered  1  and  2 
are  the  same  in  both  cases.  Apparently  he  sold  them  when 
he  could,  and  kept  changing  them  and  his  stories  about  them 
to  suit  the  interests  of  his  particular  hearers.  It  was  his  busi- 
ness to  sell  relics  with  interesting  stories  attached  to  them. 
One  list,  together  with  the  tale  of  the  mythical  pictographic 
book,  has  the  appearance  of  having  been  designed  for  Rhode 
Island  consumption  especially.  The  other  and  earlier  one 
has  nothing  in  it  reminiscent  of  that  design.  Miss  Baker's 
list  of  the  treasures  is  as  follows: 

1 .  A  knife  given  by  the  Mohawks  to  the  Penobscots. 

2.  The  collar  of  wampum  described  above,  used  at 
marriage  ceremonies. 

3.  An  iron  hatchet  given  by  King  Philip  to  the  Penob- 
scots, the  first  iron  hatchet  ever  owned  by  the  tribe.  (  But 
see  a  later  story  about  King  Philip's  axe.) 

4.  An  iron  tomahawk  given  to  the  tribe  by  King  Philip. 

5.  A  pestle  which  Big  Thunder  found  at  King's  Rocks. 

6.  A  red  sandstone  peace-pipe  obtained  from  the 
Cherokees. 

7.  The  war-bow  of  the  tribe.  Very  curious.  String  of 
caribou  hide. 

Mrs.  Eckstorm's  list,  of  two  years  earlier,  is  longer: 

1.  Scalping  knife  taken  from  the  Mohawks  when  they 
were  beaten  by  the  Penobscots!  A  very  curious,  long  knife, 
very  long  narrow  blade  inlaid  with  bright  metal,  color  of 
brass,  and  with  an  engraved  brass  handle  riveted  in  pieces 
upon  the  steel  handle.  Apparently  French  make. 

2.  A  piece  beaded  with  purple  wampum  edged  with 
white,  beads  set  on  diagonal  lines,  piece  about  2  by  8  inches, 
buckskin  fringes. 


CHIEF  BIG  THUNDER  127 

3.  Strings  of  purple  wampum. 

4.  Necklace  of  points  of  caribou  hoofs. 

5.  Necklace  of  bear's  claws  with  a  "medal  of  human 
bone." 

6.  Small  silver  brooches  from  2  to  4  inches  in  diameter, 
without  ornament. 

7.  Two  powder  horns,  one  ancient. 

8.  Some  stone  tools",  knife,  axe,  etc.,  in  handles. 

9.  Flint  and  steel. 

10.  Scalping  knife  (after  the  pattern  of  Col.  Bowie!) 
'used  by  the  Spaniards  in  the  massacre  of  Indians  at  Pema- 
quid!'  A  heavy,  rusty  knife  with  wood  handle  covered 
apparently  with  snake  skin  or  shark  skin  scraped  thin. 

11.  Various  tomahawks  of  bloody  history,  and  blud- 
geons of  modern  make. 

12.  Pictures  of  Molly  Molasses  'at  the  age  of  110, 
wearing  her  widow's  cap.'  (  Molly  was  never  married  j  died 
aged  92.) 

13.  The  relics  sent  by  Queen  Isabella  to  Mrs.  Polis, 
mother  of  Joseph  Polis,  wife  of  a  chief! !  (a)  A  silver 
'crown' — otherwise  a  silver  hat-band.  This  was  a  flexible 
belt  of  silver,  thin,  not  very  heavy,  about  3  inches  wide, 
chased  in  lines  like  one  of  our  brooches  and  with  a  line  of 
openwork  holes  near  the  top.  (b)  Several  strings  of  glass 
beads,  blue  and  garnet,  small  size  but  good  color,  (c)  Gold 
ear-rings,  diamond  ring,  and  autograph  letter  (these  last 
not  seen ;  ring  lost ) . 

14.  The  game  of  bowls.  This  was  undoubtedly  very 
ancient.  The  bowl  was  a  shallow  disk  of  wood  about  14 
inches  across,  made,  so  Lola  said,  with  stone  tools  and  200 
years  old.  The  counters  were  bone  buttons  about  1 *4  inches 
across,  plain  one  side  and  marked  with  a  simple  design  of 
curved  lines  on  the  other.  The  game  was,  putting  them  in 
the  bowl,  to  bring  it  down  with  a  thump  that  would  make 
the  counters  jump.  If  all  fell  one  side  up,  it  counted  j  if  they 
fell  heads  and  tails,  it  did  not. 


128  RHODE  ISLAND  HISTORICAL  SOCIETY 

Through  her  intimate  knowledge  of  Indians  both  here 
and  in  the  West,  Mrs.  Eckstorm  was  able  to  catch  old  Lola 
in  a  number  of  untrue  statements  both  about  the  relics  and 
in  general  conversation.  It  is  hardly  necessary  to  relate  them 
here,  as  we  have  instances  enough  to  demonstrate  his  utter 
unreliability  and  unbridled  imagination.  She  quotes  one 
old  Indian  as  saying:  "You  see,  he  never  could  bear  to  have 
anyone  tell  a  bigger  story  than  he  could.  He  always  had  to 
'over  it.'  "  But  there  is  one  more  illustration  of  his  charac- 
teristic inability  to  stick  to  truth  that  is  worth  relating.  Mrs. 
Eckstorm's  brother  had  a  guide,  who  told  him  once :  "There 
was  that  d — d  old  rascal  telling  my  mother  that  that  was 
King  Philip's  axe  that  he  used  to  kill  our  people;  and  it  was 
the  same  old  axe  I  had  just  found  in  Passadumkeag  Rips  at 
low  water  and  given  to  him." 

I  cannot  better  close  this  study  of  a  curious  personality, 
whose  reputed  strange  gifts  and  possessions  turn  out  to  be 
so  tame  and  understandable,  than  by  quoting  again  a  passage 
from  one  of  Dr.  Speck's  letters  which  I  have  published  once 
before:  "He  was  a  'show-man'  in  every  sense  of  the  term. 
He  was  a  most  unreserved  liar  and  no  secret  was  made  of  it 
among  the  Penobscot.  His  business  was  the  deception  of  the 
public.  He  had  a  little  relic  shop  on  Indian  Island  where 
he  sold  'ancient  relics'  which  he  manufactured,  and  I  have 
encountered  many  stories  and  traditions  which  were  his 
own  invention.  Among  them  must  be  included  the  'ancient 
Book'  hoax.  In  short,  Big  Thunder  was  a  joke  among  all 
who  knew  the  Indians." 

Despite  this  unavoidable  conclusion,  Big  Thunder  was  a 
'picturesque  old  rascal,'  who  contributes  to  our  entertain- 
ment if  not  to  historical  knowledge.  It  has  been  well  worth 
while  to  have  sought  out  the  facts  about  him,  as  a  one-time 
visitor  to  Rhode  Island  who  created  a  teasing  mystery  and 
a  flurry  of  interest  and  curiosity  which  the  previously  pub- 
lished accounts  of  him  in  Rhode  Island  literature  have  left 
unclarined. 


Form  of  Legacy 


"/  give  and  bequeath  to  the  Rhode  Island 

Historical  Society  the  sum  of 

dollars." 


•  ,r         I  ,: 


Roger  Williams  Press       M^li*' 


E.  A.  Johnson  Co. 


PROVIDENCE 


/•> 


\L& 


HK225-78 


4  O 


■v. 


.  M 


A  fo"«-         ^, 


<\ 


. .  * s    .e 


^^ 


1* 


*      rV>  ^  5*    „«> 


V    .  ** %L'+     « 


c5>  ^ 


•  ov    t 


^ 


,^q. 


^ 


A 


^ 


JV  i0V 


■ov    t 


**•_ 


I* 


\ 


.0' 


c 


IV 


3°?r 


^ 


^; 


o 


c- 


O 


y"v 


* 


V^1 


>S' 


,4vV       c  o  -   ,  ,      <*  A        .  v  .  .  .       ^Q  i >      c  o  -  «  „      <j>  0^ 


^a 


^ 


o- 


*0  '^ 


v^. 


*0^ 


r*& 


>^ 


'*  /.<&%  /.«•>  /••*%  /*'L 


^A,"«  ^  <^ 


.  <*  A"*         /rA^^V*  ^  .^  ♦* 


LIBRARY  OF  CONGRESS 


0  014  075  428  6